Another issue is UNCONSTITUTIONAL gun laws like the stupid Montana prohibited places laws.
The Montana shooting sports association is trying to get that stupid law repealed or modified.
The permit holder broke concealment. It's one thing to suspect that somebody is carrying a gun. It's another thing to actually see the gun.
In Montana the person carrying could lawfully have carried the gun openly. What would this ignorant person who tackled him have done then?
The prohibited places laws are INFRINGEMENT and make no sense whatsoever.
The reasoning is completely faulty. They want to disarm law abiding people in these places, to make who safer?
The criminals who carry guns unlawfully anyway! It certainly doesn't make the law abiding person safer!
Unconstitutional so called "laws" are NOT laws at all. They are null and void.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442