Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 10,360 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. WHAT THEY WRITE IS THEIR OWN OPINION, just as what I write is my own.


Saturday, December 22, 2012

The gun grabbers invented the term "assault rifle" to further their own agenda.


Send this out till your fingers are sore!
The gun grabbers invented the term "assault rifle" to further their own agenda.
Note the picture of the WW Two soldier or Korean War soldier proudly holding his M-1 rifle in the article at the link below.  This was the military style assault and main battle rifle until the early to mid sixties when the M-16 came on line.  The M-16 began that "look" that is so upsetting to the gun grabbers.  But in reality, It did nothing that the wooden stocked M-1 could do.  And the M-16 started the use of the small .223 caliber which the military uses today.  The M-1 was a 30-06, much, much more lethal.
I can remember when you could order an M-1 for under $100 from the back pages of many magazines.  I have trained with the M-1 Garand and it was capable of fully automatic or semi-auto.
What's called an assault rifle today is just a copy of the current military rifle.  It is a style but civilians cannot buy one that is fully automatic.  Those on the civilian market are not capable of fully automatic mode.  The term assault is better suited to the way the police use them busting into the wrong house...now that's an assault.
The right to keep and bear arms was put into the 2nd amendment not so the people could have guns to hunt with, but to fight any out of control tyrant.  The military at that time fought with muskets, those were the military rifles of that time and muskets were the guns of the people.
What's termed today as an assault rifle is just today's version of today's military rifle.  The word assault is a military term for close in combat with firearms.  The M1903 Springfield bolt action rifle was used in World War One as an assault rifle.  It was neither automatic nor semi-auto.  It required a lot of skill to rapidly fire.  If you've ever seen the movie, Sergeant York starring Gary Cooper, then you have seen the M1903 Springfield.  York was more than an expert with that gun.
The Springfield 1903 was also a 30-06 like the M-1 that mostly took over in WW-2.  The 30-06 became the premier high power hunting cartridge of the 20th century.  The modern military assault rifle shoots the puny, by comparison, 223 which in some states is outlawed for hunting deer, because too many times the deer is only wounded and runs away to die a prolonged death.
I hope I have made it plain that for hundreds of years the people have used the same style rifle as the military.  I have shown that the WW-1 assault rifle was not an automatic or semi-automatic but rather a bolt action rifle.  Please note in the accompanying article the writer says that at some point the gun grabbers in the government will try to ban the bolt action by calling it a sniper rifle.
Kent

Friday, December 21, 2012

Armed Citizen Saves Cop’s Life

Sgt. Steven Means of the Early Police Department in Texas, is one law enforcement officer that is thankful for the Second Amendment right for citizens to bear arms.

Read more: 

http://godfatherpolitics.com/8635/armed-citizen-saves-cops-life/#ixzz2Fl6lOOCa


Gun Owner Saves Cop's Life by Shooting Deranged Gunman!

All "gun control" so called laws are Null and Void

There are NO valid gun control laws in the USA. They want you to believe those "laws" are valid and law for you and I to follow but they are NOT valid, NOT lawful and NOT in force.

How do I know that?   Just keep reading.

1.  Go to any search engine, like www.ixquick.com or www.google.com   and type in  dick act repealed.
You will see a whole page of articles on the Dick Act of 1902.  I am NOT talking about any act passed in 1903. This was the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654 
The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

I have found page after page on the internet that all essentially say the same thing.

Here are some links.

http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3949

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread483246/pg1

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/108957/DICK_ACT_of_1902_CANT_BE_REPEALED_GUN_CONTROL_FORBIDDEN/

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=151233

http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642

2. Then there is the principle that unconstitutional "laws" are null and void from their inception.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
The higher laws always prevail when there is a conflict between them. There never will be a conflict between positive divine law, and natural law.  They are.
1. Positive Divine Law
2. Natural Law
3. Human law   notice it is on the bottom and the least of all law. This includes all civil and criminal "laws" and even cannon law.
Whenever there is a conflict between any of these,  the higher laws are always to prevail in God's eyes and they do. 
3. The current government wants all jury trials to go away. They want their corrupt judges to try all cases without a jury. They have been working for years to discredit Juries.
YOU HAVE THE POWER TO NULLIFY (refuse to apply) any bad so called "laws" as an individual juror.  Yes, you have that power; it is real; it is now; and all you need to use it is the knowledge that you have that power.
Your jury rights are your most powerful rights. Instead of trying to avoid jury duty, you should be trying to get on every jury you can. That will give you ample opportunity to educate your fellow jurors about their right to nullify bad "laws". It will also get you into a position where you can (all by yourself without another person) nullify bad law by hanging the jury (refusing to apply the so called "law" to the case you are on).
If you don't believe me take a look at this.

http://www.juryrights.info

4. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy. 
The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.

5. The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
6. Then there is the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, which was passed and signed into law by Governor Schweitzer. 
http://www.wnd.com/2010/05/159485/

And this from Chuck Baldwin:
Pertaining specifically to the Second Amendment, the State of Montana, in particular, seems to have it all together. In anticipation of the recent Heller Supreme Court decision, a host of Montana's senators and representatives—along with its Secretary of State— proposed a resolution stating "that any 'collective rights' holding in D.C. v. Heller will violate Montana's compact with the United States, the contract by which Montana entered the Union in 1889."
The Montana resolution recalls, "When Montana entered into statehood and adopted the Compact as a part of the Montana Constitution in 1889, included was a provision guaranteeing the right to bear arms to 'any person.'"
The resolution continues, "To be clear, the wording of the right to bear arms reservation in the Montana constitution is exactly the same today as it was in 1884."
Furthermore, the Montana resolution says, "There is no question that the contract into which Montana entered for statehood was predicated upon an understanding that the people of Montana would benefit from an individual and personal right to bear arms, protected from governmental interference by both the federal and Montana constitutions. That was the clear intent of the parties to the contract."
The resolution ended by stating sternly, "A collective rights holding in Heller would not only open the Pandora's box of unilaterally morphing contracts, it would also poise Montana to claim appropriate and historically entrenched remedies for contract violation."
In other words, representatives and senators in the State of Montana unequivocally put Washington, D.C., on notice that it would not tolerate the infringement of its citizens' right to keep and bear arms. I don't think I'm reading anything into the resolution by assuming that they were implying that they would secede before they let the federal government trample their Second Amendment liberties. (Plus, I've just been told that New Hampshire may also be preparing to propose such a resolution.)
7. Then there is the original compact that Montana entered with the federal government when we became a state. No less than 2 Attorneys General and one Governor have warned the Feds that any abrogation of firearms freedom in Montana by the feds will result in the breaking of that compact, which in it's logical conclusion would (in my opinion) result in Montana no longer being a State of that federal union.
8. Then there is the ABSOLUTE natural law right to self defense. Your inalienable and individual right was always contained in the US Constitution, but was clarified in 2008 by the US Supreme Court.

How about this "what if" gun seizure scenrio?

And finally "The Coming Gun Grab"  received this morning from a Montana patriot  who will remain anonymous.
" I'm not worried about a successful gun confiscation program in America. I just don't know if enough Americans will have the guts to shoot the government thugs. That is the only relevant question regarding future gun control. On this point, I quote from a speech by the latte novelist Taylor Caldwell:
"I'm going to castigate all you men here for what you have done to America  - every mother's son of you.
How did we arrive at this disastrous hour in time? I will tell you. You men.... abdicated your manhood!
You deserted the Republic. Aristotle said two thousand and five hunred years ago: "Masculine republics decline into feminine democracies and democracies into despotism."  That is what has happened to America now. We call ourselves a free country. We are not free! Tomorrow the tyranny will be overt instead of covert as it is now.
Is there any hope? Well, only a little, and I;m afraid that few men will take advantage of it.  One: Challenge your government and, if you suffer for it, to hell with sweet peace.
TWO: FIGHT GUN CONTROL! It is your right to bear arms under the Constitution (THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND FOR GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW) but the tyrants want to take away your arms so you won't be able to offer any resistance to bayonets!
Gentlemen, you can restore your dead Republic. But be again the masters of your government and be again the masters of your women or will you meekly say: "Hail, Caeser, we who are about to die salute you."
(End quote from Tayler Caldwell)

Don't worry that they'll get your guns. Worry that you might NOT have the guts to use them. Will you let federal barbarians storm your neighborhood, breaking down doors - or will everybody on your block rain a torrent of copper-jacketed lead on these thugs? It's about to hit the fan - will you be courageous?

If you can't imagine -gasp!- defending your rights and your property and your family against the Government, then SELL YOUR GUNS TO A REAL MAN. Who are you fooling? You don't deserve a Zeiss-scoped Sako any more than a .22 Jennings.

Give up your guns now and spare yourself the embarrassment later. 
The 2nd Amendment is for men - not hobbyists.

And here is one of the best pledges I have ever read from a man that I know personally and who I absolutely believe will do exactly as he says:

My Personal Pledge of Resistance Against Any Attemp to Disarm Us by Means of an "Assault Weapons Ban"

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2012/12/19/my-personal-pledge-of-resistance-against-any-attemp-to-disarm-us-by-means-of-an-assault-weapons-ban/

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Gun Controller in Chief's home town Chicago kills more kids

Chicago: 446 school age children shot so far this year with strongest gun laws in country – media silent The cesspool known as Chicago probably has the toughest gun laws in the country, yet despite all the shootings, murders, and bloodshed, you never hear a peep about this from the corrupt state run media. In Chicago, there have been ... READ MORE

This is the REAL OBAMA !

----- Original Message -----
From: Basil Fishbone
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:27 PM
Subject: Obama Justifies FEMA Imprisonment Of Civilians!

Commentary by Rachel Maddow.

Maddow was very nice to Ron Paul... and she's right on again with this.   Rachel is on the "civil libertarian left", and I think she illustrates the need to be open to communication and cooperation against which certainly appears to be an impending tyranny right here at home.   The Powers that Be want us to be fighting each other, not them.   ~Basil

Obama Justifies FEMA Imprisonment Of Civilians!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr9NCZP_fbU&feature=player_embedded

-----------------------------------------

Get your guns, then put you in jail. That is what he wants.

How long will it be until he says something like, well, we just can't afford to keep all these people in jail, so we have to get rid of them.

They know that juries can stop their lawlessness! So they want to eliminate the whole messy thing of a trial, and a jury, and just be able to put you away at their whim.

The founders would have been done by now!

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Living Under Drones. Coming to Amerika

How would you like to live in Pakistan under this terror from the US Government?



Read the comments on this page then tell me this doesn't cause BLOWBACK!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6yMOzvmgVhc#!

Monday, December 17, 2012

Crazy Shootings? Don't believe the media

Here are some stories that the mainstream media is avoiding completely about the latest shootings around the country. The media wouldn't know the truth if it slapped them upside the head.

Don't have any loaded guns around when you read these stories, because it's going to make you very, very angry that the truth is not being told.


MEDIA BLACKOUT: OREGON MALL SHOOTER WAS STOPPED BY AN ARMED CITIZEN !


GUN CONTROL: A DIVIERSION FROM REALITY


BREAKING NEWS: CT SCHOOL SHOOTER KILLER LINK TO LIBOR SCANDAL

Watch the videos in this one. Very revealing.


WHO REALLY KILLED THE CONNECTICUT CHILDREN?


GUN EXPERT LOTT: LET TEACHERS CARRY ARMS, BAN GUN-FREE ZONES TO HALT MASS SHOOTINGS






The News Media won't tell you this about the Oregon Shooter


Media blackout: Oregon mall shooter was stopped by an armed citizen!

The shooter, Jacob Tyler Roberts, was confronted with an armed citizen, at which time he ran away and shot himself. By the time police arrived on the scene, Roberts was already dead.

Read the entire story here:

Sunday, December 16, 2012

The Solution to our Nation’s ‘Gun Problem’

We need some public executions to send a message.

Thieves don’t care about laws against theft, and rapists don’t care about laws against rape. The same is true about drinking and driving.

Schools should immediately develop a program where every teacher is trained in how to handle a firearm. 
Read more: 


http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/12/the-solution-to-our-nations-gun-problem/#ixzz2FHDav7fj

Take Your Precious Children Out of Government Schools


Take Your Precious Children Out of Government Schools
Have parents lost their minds? What will it take before they get their kids out of the government hell-hole? How about Christian parents for God’s sake!! How could a Christian ever put his/her child in a secular-training center? The media wants to blame guns, but no one wants to blame the schools. Let me paint a picture......
http://www.newswithviews.com/Daubenmire/dave304.htm
by Coach Dave Daubenmire

Friday, December 14, 2012

Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols


I have been following the international currency wars for 2 years now, and this email needs your attention. If the Deutsche Bank, which some say is the primary bank the Nazi machine is still using, although covertly, is now frozen, then there is about to be a huge upheaval in the European banking cabal, and the effects will be without precedent in all of history.
These banks are all interconnected with all the banksters in Amerika and this might be the first domino.
Pay attention to this and read the entire article about Leo Wanta. He is another  person that has been lied about on a  global basis for years. Even on the internet there are many articles that try to smear this guy. I am just saying that this needs to be watched continuously for the next while.

Paul

Here are some important links on this subject.



And from the Idaho Observer


The first 10 chapters of the new book are available under the Lee Wanta Biography here:

http://theglobalnewsandviews.com/lee-wanta-bio/

This is from one of the people that I know who have bought Iraqi Dinars in anticipation of a currency revaluation world wide. 12-12-12


It can now be reported that on the direct orders of the IMF (International Monetary Fund), the U.S. Provost Marshal, European INTERPOL and the German Police, all Deutsche Bank derivative-riddled proprietary accounts were frozen today on 12-12-12.
Item: The crooked U.S. Federal Reserve has now been totally neutralized by what took place in Europe today.
The announcement by Fed Chairman Bernard Bernanke of his program QE Infinity is not a stimulus but the continuation of a ponzi scheme to buy back toxic assets aka worthless mortgage-backed securities tied to major U.S. financial giants (gangster banks) and none other than their underwriter, the Nazi "Skull and Bones" Deutsche Bank.
P.S. Now that the Deutsche Bank has had their derivative accounts frozen there are really no derivatives outstanding for the crooked Fed to prop up.
Translation: QE4 is now Titanic5.
P.P.S. At this hour we can also divulge that gangster U.S. banks like Goldman Sachs and U.S. Bank are now totally exposed in new illegally cross-collateralized derivative positions aka written call options in crude oil and unleaded gasoline futures markets, which were designed to protect their already undermargined naked long positions in natural gas.
P.P.P.S. So, at this hour, the IMF and the U.S. Provost Marshal continue to order massive asset redemption and repatriation of collateralized assets aka precious and industrial metals.
Introduction
In closing, we can now directly report that after the freezing of the Deutsche Bank proprietary accounts that took place today, 12-12-12, the IMF is now prepared to fully implement the Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols with the Obama Administration absent.
Finally, it is time to buy the black gold and sell the yellow gold.
Deutsche Bank is down. OMG OMG Bye bye Bushes and shrubs
This is huge news people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The biggest bank that is in with the Fed scum bags has just been neutered. The Reagan Wanta Protocols are done. WOW WEE Public RV is around the corner.

And if you don't know what a Provost Marshall is this is from Wikipedia:


In the United States Army and United States Marine Corps, the senior military police officer is the Provost Marshal General (PMG) (Army) or Provost Marshal (USMC). The PMG was a post that was reinstated in 2003, having been abolished for 29 years. The PMG is in charge the United States Army Military Police CorpsU.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) and United States Army Corrections Command (ACC) policy and procedures from an office in The Pentagon.
The senior MP officer at the theater, corps, division, and brigade level and for each garrison is known as a provost marshal. In many US Army garrisons, a provost marshal is at times also responsible for the provision of fire and physical security as well as law enforcement services and thus is also referred to as the Director of Emergency Services.



Thursday, December 13, 2012

2ND BITE TO CHALLENGE OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY?

A longstanding eligibility case challenging Barack Obama’s presence in the White House soon could be headed to the state Supreme Court in Alabama, where one justice already in a court filing has questioned the authenticity of Obama’s documentation, and the incoming chief justice is a dyed-in-the-wool Constitution supporter with little tolerance for those who want to bypass the document.
The move is pending in an eligibility challenge brought by Hugh McInnish and others against the Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman.

Read more at 

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

The Blind Lead the Blind and both fall into the pit!

Sex charges rock Purpose Driven 'healthy church'.

For there shall be a time when they will not endure sound doctrine but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables.  2 Timothy 4


Read more a
t

 http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/sex-charges-rock-purpose-driven-healthy-church/#Jrdvw0AjKSP60m4u.99 

Monday, December 10, 2012

The Real Terrorists are in GOVERNMENT



THIS CRAP WILL STOP when the American people have the guts to stop it, and not until then.

Ask yourself this question. WHAT WAS THE SECOND AMENDMENT ALL ABOUT?

War on terror????   What about the terrorists in the federal government?

With the corruption in the judicial system and NO justice being available to the little guy the only hope to stop this short of blood is for the people to understand their rights as a juror and nullify (refuse to apply) these bad laws supposedly justifying these raids.

During prohibition the courts no longer could get convictions because jurors refused to convict.
They were forced to take those bad laws off the books.

Try these links.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/11/what-is-really-law-and-what-is-not-law.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/10/major-victory-for-jury-nullification.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/12/juries-can-stop-runaway-government-you.html

http://juryrights.info/

Thursday, December 6, 2012

Rand Paul blows it again!

Rand Paul is supporting this amendment to NDAA that falls far short of fixing the problem.
In fact it might make things worse by muddying the water legally.

http://app.streamsend.com/private/urb99fh41u/U7V/MLwjYWL/browse/17560639

From Devvy.com


There is a new effort and PAC underway to run Sen. Rand Paul for president in 2016. No thank you. He continues to blunder on too many things.
This Week In News For Senator Rand Paul - November 30, 2012
"Please allow me to update you on this week's events here in our nation's capital and on a very important issue back home in Kentucky.
"A Victory for Americans' Right to Trial by Jury
"This week I took to the Senate floor to voice my support for an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) sponsored by Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah).
"The amendment would invoke the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution with regard to indefinite detention of American citizens. I indicated my intention to push for a vote on this amendment and has threatened to filibuster the NDAA bill until a vote is granted. Click HERE or below to watch my speech in support of the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution and the Feinstein-Lee NDAA Amendment.
"Finally that evening, the Senate voted on the Feinstein-Lee Amendment to the NDAA that I co-sponsored. It would protect the rights prescribed to all Americans in the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution with regard to indefinite detention and the right to a trial by jury. Moments before the vote, I spoke on the Senate floor to again voice my support for the amendment and inspire my Senate colleagues to do the same."
Wrong, again, Dr. Paul.

http://app.streamsend.com/private/urb99fh41u/U7V/MLwjYWL/browse/17526595

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/13789-feinstein-lee-ndaa-amendment-passes-but-is-it-enough

Bombshell case, CA Supreme Court to rule on Obama Eligibility


Press release from the Law Offices of Dr. Orly Taitz

Breaking news! Supreme Court of CA to rule whether Obama should be declared illegitimate for the U.S. Presidency due to his use of forged IDs and a fraudulently obtained CT Social Security number. Loss of 55 CA electoral votes will certainly mean new elections in the U.S.
After originally refusing to hear the case under the original jurisdiction, Supreme Court of California was persuaded by Attorney and Candidate for the U.S. Senate Dr. Orly Taitz to take on a case Noonan, Judd, MacLaren, Taitz v Bowen under the provisions of the California Constitution, which allow Supreme Court of California to hear special cases under the Original Jurisdiction. Docket excerpt is below. Case number is S 207078 Noonan v Bowen. Attorney Orly Taitz.

This case is brought on behalf of four plaintiffs, all of whom have perfect standing. Edward Noonan won the American Independent Party Presidential Primary   in CA and certificate of his win was submitted to the court. Keith Judd is a Democratic Party candidate for the U.s. Presidency, registered with the FEC, he was a runner up to Barack Obama in West Virginia Democratic Party Primary with 40% of the vote, Thomas Gregory Macleran was a Republican candidate for President, registered with the FEC. Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz was a candidate for the U.S. Senate in CA.

This case has two premises.  


First.  Plaintiffs provided the court with evidence of nearly One and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California. Such a large number of invalid votes justifies STAY of certification of the results.

Second.  Plaintiffs provided evidence of Candidate Barack Obama committing massive elections fraud by using  forged IDs and a fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to Obama and using a name, which is not legally his, as he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in his mother’s U.S. Passport and there is no evidence of him ever legally changing his name from Barack Obama Soebarkah to Barack Obama. Additionally, in his school records in Indonesia his citizenship is listed as Indonesian, not American. There is no record of him relinquishing his Indonesian citizenship and gaining the U.S. citizenship. Even if one were to believe that he arguendo changed his citizenship from Indonesian to American later in life, he would be a naturalized citizen and not natural born. Additionally, plaintiffs provided the courts with a  sworn affidavits of Maricopa county, AZ investigator Mike Zullo, who is currently conducting a criminal investigation of forgeries in Obama’s IDs, and who attested that Obama’s birth certificate, Selective Service certificate and Social Security card represent forgeries.  Similarly, Plaintiffs provided affidavits of   Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, Senior Deportation Officer John Sampson, experts Paul Irey, Douglas Vogt and Felicito Papa and investigator Susan Daniels, all of whom are attesting that Obama’s IDs are forgeries. Affidavit of Assistant Clerk for the City of Honolulu Timothy Adams attests to the fact that there is no birth certificate for Barack Obama in any hospital in Hawaii.  Statement of the Minister of Health of Kenya, James Orenga attesting to Obama’s birth in Kenya and Obama’s own biography submitted by him to his literally agent in 1991, stating that he was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia.    Plaintiffs are stating that if this court does not STAY the certification of the election results, this court will commit treason against the United States of America by allowing a foreign national, a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still citizen of Kenya to get in the position of the U.S. President and Commander n Chief by virtue of fraud and use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number.


Read more here:

http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2012/12/ca-supreme-court-to-rule-on-obama-eligibility-2450604.html

Who is the real Santa Claus

Yes he is real. I can tell you where he lived and where he lives now.

His name is Saint Nicholas, and he was the Bishop of Myra in Asia Minor, and today we celebrate his heavenly birthday. Yes he now lives in heaven, and from there he is really watching not only the children, but everyone of good heart that really believes in his life and teachings

He is NOT magic (there is no such thing), but he does work miracles. In fact he has worked so many miracles that nobody can count them.

What he wants is for all of us, children and everyone TO BE GOOD, AND NOT DO EVIL.

Here is the real story of his life from the "New Roman Missal by the Reverend Fr. F. X. Lasance 1937. 
December 6th. 
St. Nicholas Archbishop of Myra in  Asia Minor, from the childlike innocence of his own life, and his devout care for the young, is looked upon as the patron of children. He died in the middle of the Fourth Century, and seven hundred years later his holy relics were translated to Bari in Italy. Because of the power he exercised over flames, we pray that through his intercession we may be preserved from the flames of hell. He is remembered for the money which he threw in a window that three young girls might have a dowry for their marriage. Because of this gift his name has become associated with giving and children thank Santa Claus (or St. Nicholas) for their presents at Christmastime.

And from the Lives of the Saints, by Omer Englebert, 1951

Few saints enjoy such great popularity and few are credited with so many miracles. Sts. John Chrysostom, Peter Damian, and Bonaventure have vied in eloquence with one another in telling of the merits and the goodness of Saint Nicholas. Born at Patara in Lycia, he visited the Thebaid, ruled the great monastery, was imprisoned for a time for his faith, and ended his life as archbishop of Myra.
It is doubtless the story of his restoring life to the children put in the salting tub which caused him to become the patron and the annual benefactor of school children. St. Bonaventure tells the story in a sermon. St. Nicholas was, it seems, on his way to the Council of Nicaea, when he entered an inn whose owner, not content with having killed two young boys for the sake of their meagre purse, had cut them up and was about to sell them piecemeal to his clients. The bishop restored them to life and then converted this murderer.
Another famous tale is that of the three marriageable girls who did not succeed in getting married. Poor and not knowing what to do with them, their father was about to put them into a house of ill fame. Nicholas took advantage of the fact that this odious man slept with his window open, to go one night and throw a purse filled with gold into his room. A few days later, the eldest daughter was married. In the same way, Nicholas delivered to the second the dowry she needed. Soon she, too, found a husband. The saint was discovered at the moment when he was throwing up from the street the purse destined for the third. The father, who had been hiding in the shadow, recognized him; he fell at his feet, weeping in penitence and gratitude, and from then on did not cease to sing his praises everywhere.
____________________________________

So the tradition is based on real events about a real person who set an example of generosity, morality, and giving for all of us to follow. Pray to him and ask him to obtain for you what you really need both in temporal and especially spiritual gifts.


So today is the yearly feast of Saint Nicholas, Bishop and Confessor, and Cannonized Saint of the Catholic Church.

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Sales through the roof at the gun shows


This article was written by my Silver associate in Denver and is what you should be watching in the coming few weeks and months.
The Gobal financial system is failing RIGHT NOW and there is no way mathematically possible to save it EVEN IF WE WANTED TO.
We need to start over with currency with intrinsic value like precious metals - gold, silver, lead, brass, copper etc.
Silver is flat flying out the door right now. Time is short. Everything I sell at the gun shows is moving really well and setting records for sales.
Solar Equipment, fuel preservative, radios, silver, and the new little stove that charges your batteries while it cooks your meals in camp are
generating a lot of interest and sales.
 
I will be in Bozeman this weekend for the final 3 day show of the year, then I am done with shows until February in Butte.
 
We just had a barn burner of a show in Kalispell. It was the best show of the year there for many of the vendors including me.
I don't know how much longer we will be able to do the gun shows, but I will be riding that ship when it goes down.
If you want some silver before it's too late look here and then call for the best price.
 
Paul Stramer  KC7MEZ
SLC Distributing
PO Box 116
Eureka MT 59917
800 889 2839pstramer@eurekadsl.net
 
 
Info I’m getting to pay attention to:

Info coming out that the US has defaulted on payments to China and that China has demanded the US pay up in full. O is stalling and blocking global currency revaluation(RV) that would completely pay this debt off as he wants a 40% tax on the RV. China has said pay or we are coming to basically repossess and has launched its Navy. O has said "bring it". China is said to possess EMP weaponry that will if used, throw the US back to the dark ages.

Now, none of what I am saying is exaggerated. If O does not go with the demands of China and Mr. WU, who now basically owns the Fed Res, then we will most likely be looking at WW III with China in the coming weeks. There have been countless high level meetings in the last several weeks on all of this and is what I have been posting about including the stock market crash on Fri after Thanksgiving. Mr. Wu accepted O's word that the RV would get done and didn't crash the stock market. Now at this time, O is flirting with a nuclear bomb since he hasn't lived up to his promise and Wu and the Dragons are just about done talking and negotiating. I know there is a high level meeting scheduled for tomorrow afternoon which may be the final tipping point based on what I hear is to be discussed.

China is not Japan of WW II....War with China will bring in Russia as an ally, India, Iran, many of the Asian countries and more. Now the US Corp is bankrupt and if there is a war, there will be no money to pay for it as the US's lender, China, will be on the opposite side. … China, already owns significant land in the US, their troops already stationed in Mexico, the sub off of Calif that fired a missile 6-9 months ago, the other subs patrolling in the Gulf of Mexico …. To think we are the big boy on the block any more, well you are sadly mistaken. Now The other side of this is the financial war China has already waged on the US which the US is losing to the ability for China to completely and totally crash the stock market to a value of DOW < 3000 from its current level. I have many, many more examples that will support the fact that China is and has control of this and if it comes to a war, it will be a war the US will most certainly lose.

Some of this hinted at in today’s post on Dinar Recaps:  http://www.dinarrecaps.com/1/post/2012/12/terryk-get-team-member-chat6.html

I have been following all of this for a few years now… China told us back in 2008 that if we failed on our debt payment to them, they would consider it an act of war.
Then, they formed the BRICS treaty/alliance with Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS  which basically said they would no longer conduct trade with the US Dollar as the world reserve currency…and have since been trading amongst themselves in a gold-backed currency.  Since then, other countries have joined them; this effectively wiped out the US Dollar as the world reserve currency, and has brought down the fiat central banking system. The entire story goes back centuries… http://newtomorrow.us/main.html

We are about to see this come to fruition… in January 2013 Basel III standards will be implemented world-wide, which will require the central banks to have assets of gold, silver, oil, gas, precious gems etc. to back the value of their currency.  They will no longer be able to just print money at will.   Gold and silver prices have been manipulated to keep up the appearance that fiat currency has retained value; we will be seeing that manipulation soon come to an end, and physical metal prices will separate from the manufactured derivative pricing. 

We have seen shifts in trade and jobs and real estate etc. over the last few years – everything going to China… now you know why… pacification because the US has been in default on our debt to China… there’s also a huge story about US theft of gold from China that dates back to WWII and Chiang Kai-Shek era… much of that has been stashed away in caves in the Philippines… but also used illegally (stolen) by the Central Bankers (Rothchilds, Rockerfeller-Bush Cabal).

If you’ve been following the implementation of the Wanta-Reagan-Mitterand protocols… http://www.myspace.com/tom_heneghan_intel/blog/546523783 this is also in the works… along with the global currency re-set, the change of the world-reserve currency from US Dollar to Chinese yuan/ remnimbi…

All of this ties in with what’s been happening with gold and silver, and the dinar RV….which is how I came to be researching all of this stuff to begin with…


Mary Beth Maidment
Silver & Gold Shop

Monday, December 3, 2012

Montana Courtroom Incident Proves Wild Fire Can Burn Twice


This story should make national headlines since Joel Boniek was the legislator that sponsored the Montana Firearms Freedom Act that has gone viral around many states.  Pour on the truth Joel, and let us know how to help spread this story.
This remarkable story begins with a wild fire in Paradise Valley, Montana, south of the small City of Livingston. The valley is aptly named, as it runs from Yellowstone National Park northward all the way to Livingston, Montana. The valley uses steep mountains to showcase the Yellowstone River in scenic beauty renewed and refreshed with every bend as the river winds its way through the silent majesty of Rocky Mountain ranges between Gardiner and Livingston.
Months after a wild fire was quenched, its flames have resurrected to envelop a courtroom in Livingston, Montana with a fiery exchange which has sparked fear and defensive psycho-babble in the hearts of a vociferous huddle of collectivists who are trying to forge a new culture in Montana. At their service is a newspaper cadre which serves up the Progressive perception for readers far and wide.
The culture clash between recently arrived statists and old-fashioned Montanans ignited in a spontaneous combustion in a small courtroom in mid-November, 2012, when a man wearing a three-cornered hat, like that of our forefathers of the American Revolution, stood up and bellowed to the judge in a loud, rich, baritone voice, “Bull Sh*t!”.
What happened next has been wildly misinterpreted in headlines around Montana as the state-worshipping collectivists and socialists of the press were quick in their attempt to douse such a flame, the flame of freedom, the fiery individualist rejection which dared challenge governmental authority. In their misrepresentation and mockery, the press has maligned a former State Representative’s character.
To help readers understand, here are a few of the headlines going about the Internet and some Montana newspapers. We will rebut these headlines and expose the shameful intent of the press further down in this article.
See the whole story and the evidence here:

Thursday, November 29, 2012

What is really law, and what is NOT law?

There is a big contention today about what is really law for you and I to follow. Here is an article and my comment that might clear some of this up.

A teaser from the article:
For if you have a right to something, then by definition you do not require permission to exercise that right. And more – the state (organized force) has no standing – under natural law – to use force to limit the exercise of that right in any way whatsoever. But the reverse is just as true. By having conceded that you need to beg permission, you become party to a binding legal contract – whether you see it that way or not is immaterial.

And my comment is as follows:

Maybe, but here is the caveat.  
The "binding legal contract" is null and void because it was unilateral, and done by fraud and deception, threat, duress, intimidation and coercion. In other words there is no contract and the right stands. In other words, they threaten you if you don't opt to buy into the contract, and in the eyes of the creator of those rights, nobody has the right to threaten anyone into a contract, and the fact that they are applying force and threat NULLIFIES THE CONTRACT ITSELF ON THE FACE OF IT.  THERE IS NO CONTRACT when it is unilateral.  A person so threatened is allowed under natural law to feign compliance to avoid the threat, and then exercise the right as if there is NO contract.  So one can get a concealed carry permit, even though in the eyes of God you have the absolute right to defend yourself without it. You can exercise the right to carry regardless of their Non Laws, as if they didn't exist, even though you have feigned compliance, knowing all along that before God you are NOT complying with their so called "law" because it is not law at all.
Then there is the principle that unconstitutional "laws" are null and void from their inception.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
The higher laws always prevail when there is a conflict between them. There never will be a conflict between positive divine law, and natural law.  They are.
1. Positive Divine Law
2. Natural Law
3. Human law   notice it is on the bottom and the least of all law. This includes all civil and criminal "laws" and even cannon law.
Whenever there is a conflict between any of these,  the higher laws are always to prevail in God's eyes and they do.  

I remind you of Patrick Henry's famous quote:
"It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings. ... Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things, which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it. Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. ... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"

There are many ways to exercise liberty, and some want to be at liberty from God's laws also.
That is nothing but slavery, for if we want to free ourselves from God's laws, we then place ourselves into slavery to Satan.

The only question is the risk factor of disobeying what corrupt judges regard as law. Many of the so called laws are there for nothing more than to create crimes without victims to raise money for the system, fleecing the public because they won't study or take a stand. But there are some issues that are not worth the effort, time and money to fight. One I can think of is the "drivers license".  If you hold that you should go about without one because it would be an abrogation of principle and entering into a contract, then you open yourself up to a fight you can't win and it stops you from fighting something far more important. The same applies to concealed carry and a whole host of other issues. It does me no harm to feign to comply with their non law about concealed carry, not here in the civil law situation, or in the moral law before God almighty.
It's a non law. I know that, God knows that, but the stupid judges who are corrupt and want the money insist that "IT'S THE LAW" so I choose to feign compliance without conceding that it's the law.
I have done this many times on my income tax returns.  I have stamped them over the signature.
" Explicitly Reserving all Rights Without Prejudice"  and UCC 1-207 or 1-308 or both.  Look them up. In effect you have nullified the so called "contract" without effecting any right coming from God, or effecting any other issues in human law. Regarding the instant right you are dealing with, there is no issue because in their eyes you have complied.

Live to fight another day, and to fight the really important issues, WHEN YOU CHOOSE and on your terms rather than their terms and in their corrupt courts.

You will get your chance to prove your metal soon enough, and it will be your life at stake instead of some trumped up charge for some victim less so called "crime".

For further information read my article on "When is it time to fight?" here:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/09/when-is-it-time-to-fight.html

One more thing that is of the utmost importance.

Your jury rights are your most powerful rights. Instead of trying to avoid jury duty, you should be trying to get on every jury you can. That will give you ample opportunity to educate your fellow jurors about their right to nullify bad "laws". It will also get you into a position where you can (all by yourself without another person) nullify bad law by hanging the jury (refusing to apply the so called "law" to the case you are on).
If you don't believe me take a look at this.
http://www.juryrights.info

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post on this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced ©

CHRISTIANS HAVE LOST THEIR SAVOR


Christians Have Lost Their Savor
Ultimately, the cultural war is a moral war. It is morality that defines a culture. Changing the morality changes the cultural. Multi-culturalism has done to America what AIDS does to the human body. There is no American culture anymore. Christian morality is the only protection against cultural AIDS. Humanism is to Christianity what kryptonite was to Superman. Have you noticed they are sandblasting the 10 Commandments.....
http://www.newswithviews.com/Daubenmire/dave301.htm
by Coach Dave Daubenmire