House Joint Resolution 192 and Congressional "Intent"

By Anna Von Reitz

I have been asked to comment on HJR 192 and the whole subject of Congressional Intent.

A "Joint Resolution" is like a New Year's Resolution. It has no force of law, but it does clearly express the intent of a Congressional Body.

Which "Congressional Body" is expressing their intent in HJR 192?

It's the Territorial United States Congress acting in the wake of FDR declaring "the" United States of America, Inc. insolvent.
And they are attempting to meet their obligations owed under the Hague Conventions by saying, oh, yes, if anyone wants to, they can reclaim their "reversionary trust interest" in the actual United States as remedy for us taking title to their assets and using their assets as collateral backing our debts.

What they are doing is -- to put it bluntly -- expressing their intention to provide remedy and thereby legalize their crime. The rats had to provide remedy in the form of an escape clause or go to jail and have no ability to enforce their false claims.

This is how they claimed (and continue to claim) that we are all paying federal income taxes voluntarily, and paying off their mortgages taken against our property voluntarily, and licensing our right to travel voluntarily, and subjecting ourselves to their statutory codes and rules voluntarily ---- when we all know that none of this has ever been fully disclosed to the American People, is unconscionable, non-consensual, and enforced under color of law.

But it was, and it still is, and it is only now --- twenty years after the 1933 Bankruptcy settled --- that people are waking up and beginning to realize that: (1) HJR 192 exists and (2) why it exists and (3) what to do in response to the circumstance.

What is perhaps more important is that people are beginning to wonder--- WTH? Why is the Territorial Government in charge here, as if we were all a bunch of Puerto Ricans?