demonstrating why We the People can never trust BANKS (or fiat)
All governments eventually resort to terrorism against their own citizens when they don’t get the compliance they want. It is a universal rule repeated thousands of times throughout history. And now, as the freedom convoy participants in Canada are achieving real traction against the tyranny of Justin “Castro” Trudeau’s regime, that same regime has decided to engage in blatant acts of financial terrorism against Canadian citizens in order to try to destroy them.
Under Trudeau, Finance Minister and WEF governor Chrystia Freeland has announced that Canada will direct banks to steal all the money out of the accounts of protest participants and make their lives a kind of financial hell, all without any due process or the rule of law. No warrants are required, and no proof of any wrongdoing, either. It is full-blown financial terrorism carried out by the government itself.
Her exact announcement was:
“[we will be] broadening the scope of Canada’s anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules so that they cover crowdfunding platforms and the payment service providers they use. These changes cover all forms of transactions, including digital assets such as crypto currencies…”
In other words, the Canadian government just declared they will seize all donations to any group they don’t like. And they’re even going to attempt to go after cryptocurrencies as well. Thankfully, the decentralized nature of crypto will make that effort extremely difficult — if not impossible — for the criminal government of Canada to successfully carry out.
Watch the video from Twitter on this page.
TD Bank has already seized around $1.4 million in funds that were donated to the Freedom Convoy, proving that financial institutions will gladly go along with government-sponsored terrorism, theft and fraud whenever they feel like it. As The New American reports:
The Toronto-based financial institution has said it is acting on a Thursday order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice banning the disbursement of funds connected to the Freedom Convoy to its rightful recipients.
Meanwhile, a second crowdfunding source, the Christian company GiveSendGo, has already confirmed that it has no problem flouting what it considers an unjust Canadian court order, tweeting on February 10: “Know this! Canada has absolutely ZERO jurisdiction over how we manage our funds here at GiveSendGo. All funds for EVERY campaign on GiveSendGo flow directly to the recipients of those campaigns, not least of which is The Freedom Convoy campaign.”
As I’ve pointed out in a short podcast posted below, this entire fiasco reveals the perfect use case for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies — evading the financial terrorism and criminal theft of governments. The decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies makes it extremely difficult for criminal governments to steal peoples’ money… and that’s precisely the point.
What Canada, Trudeau and TD Bank are demonstrating here for the entire world to see is that we can’t trust the financial institutions anymore, since they will collude with criminal governments to steal money from innocent people.
In other words, the entire covid “plandemic” caused people to lose all faith in Big Pharma, government regulators, science journals and the media. Now, through these acts of financial terrorism, Canada and TD Bank are giving people 1.4 million new reasons to abandon any remaining faith in mainstream financial institutions.
It couldn’t happen at a better time, of course, since Canada, the USA and other nations are printing their own fiat currencies into financial oblivion. Anyone clueless enough to keep their money in mainstream banks should expect to experience a total wipeout of all their fiat assets before long. The only true safe havens from all this are gold, silver, land and other hard assets that can’t vanish. Crypto has a role due to its portability and transaction speed, but it’s also subject to digital money printing which is inflating values across the crypto landscape. But that’s another story for another day.
Despite crypto’s risks and problems, it is the perfect solution to funding peaceful protesters and avoiding government financial terrorism.
somewhat similarly, someone is starting a "Campaign" to get the Canadian people to go lock themselves in their homes for a week in "Support of the Canadian Truckers".
ReplyDeletewould that be time enough to ah rest everyone?
"annainc" is still not accepting questions or taking comments on "its" Articles, so i will continue posting my questions here, in the comment sections of other Articles paul puts up, in good faith.
Deleteit is noteworthy that:
1. "annainc"/others criticize Justin Trudeau for running away from questions, and hiding, but 98% of the time refuses to answer questions too, and also seems to "hide" "themselves" behind and in the anonomity of a COMPUTER SCREEN!
why?? why not answer a logical question from readers and commenters when the Articles seem to make a point where no apparent point exists/ other abnormality? what is the reason for that?
comment after reading "annavoncommerce"'s Article:
Delete02-12-2022: What to Do About Obstruction of Trade:
*****************************
it be-ing true that:
the U. S. Constitutions:
a. have NO "FIDUCIARY SIGNATORIES
b. all SIGNATORIES ARE WITNESSES ONLY, to the EVENT/ EXISTENCE of a piece of paper and these SIGNATORY WITNESSES HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACTUAL CONTRACT OR WHAT IS IN IT AT ALL.
c. HAS NO ENABLE-MENT CLAUSE
d. HAS NO ENACT-MENT CLAUSE
e. WAS NOT RATIFIED by the American people or their lawfully elected, people-consented unincorporated State Delegates:
then, to start the questions:
1. EXACTLY WHO DOES "ANNAVONFICTION" CLAIM/OTHER ARE THE "PARTIES" TO IT, agreeing it is AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT and was AGREED TO?
definitions along with with complete and true American common law meanings required*.
2. EXACTLY WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR
"ANNAVON'S" CONTINUED CLAIM/OTHER THAT ITS FUNCTION *IS* AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT;
*definitions required.
3. EXACTLY WHAT IS THE:
• LAWFUL, NOT "LEGAL/OTHER FICTION",
• PROOF, NOT "EVIDENCEFICTION"
THAT "ANNAFICTION" OR ANY "FICTION/OTHER" have showing that the U.S. Constitution/ other "name" EVEN *IS* an Employment Contract that:
has "Fiduciaries"
was "Enabled"
was "Enacted"
was lawfully accepted and lawfully ratified by the American people?
so far, i know of no proof and/or proof recorded on the record before the American people showing we ever intended to *hire* (common law word)/"Employ" (Commerce TERM) either the BRIT-ish "Queen/King" FICTIONS/ Affiliates or the BRIT-ish "Crown" FICTIONS/Affiliates: our hired men: to take care of us, protect us, feed us, or for any other reason whatsoever at all.
*definitions required.
i require these proofs be provided right here in this comment section of pauls blog.
more proofs may be required.
i do say that if no such proofs are so-presented then the claimers/ other "ACQUIESE"/silently agree that what i have written here before the people is true.
woman:janmarie
at present, there seems to be only proofs that all compliance was generated by use of THREAT, FORCE, HARM, DURESS, COERCION, LYING, DECEIT, CONFISCATIONS, MIS AND DIS INFORMATION, IMPRISONMENTS, PENALTIES, FINES, FEES, CLAIMS NOT RECORDED, USE OF FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS/ AUTHORITY AND OTHER HARMS AND TRESPASSES TO AND UPON man, not from intent.
DeleteOur American War for Independence, July 2(TWO), 1776, NOT "Revolutionary War", THAT WAS LAWFULLY AND DILIGENTLY DECLARED BEFORE THE people OF THE WORLD AGAINST these same/similarly- constructed FICTIONS; their Principals/ Agents/Affiliates: does proves that what i:woman do say: true: that the American people are not "under" authority of any Democracy, Republic, Oligarchy, Theocracy, Monarchy, Crown, Chair, Head, Ship, Order, Military, Corporation, Religion, or OTHER FICTIONAL CONSTRUCT or their Agents, Affiliates, or other.
Deleteinstead:
we are free man under authority of our creator; and are a free and independent people; and our government that we created for the one purpose of securing our God-given rights is lawfully and peacefully carried out for our good, without harming other man, by the Delegates and Deputies we lawfully elect to carry out what we decide, using our Free and Independent State-creations;
AND THEY ARE ALL UNDER **US**, the people who created them; for good to man-kind AND EXIST ONLY FROM OUR INTENT AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF GOOD ONLY.
AND ANYTHING THAT HARMS US OR OTHER man, VIOLATES OUR CONSCIENCE, COERCES US, HARMS OR THREATENS US; OR TAKES AWAY THE FRUITS OF OUR BODY OR THE FRUITS OUR LABOR OR ANY OTHER man:
IS *****NOT***** OUR GOVERNMENT AND WE HAVE RIGHT AND DUTY FOR PEACE AND FROM LAW, HOLD SAME TO COUNT (not AC-count) FOR HARM DONE TO man.
AND IT IS SO, in accord with (cord-ed to:connect-ed to) our Country's intent, declaration, and recorded law/s.
woman:janmarie: naturalborn daughter and descendant from man:father:simon: commonly known by calling "kenton"; virginia-land, around 1755: Captain, American War for Independence, Scout and POW, Shawnee Nation; and Brigadier General: Ohio Militiamen, War of 1812: ended in Peace Treaty, Ghent, Belgium: effective 1815: STILL STANDING.
and it is so.
for any new readers, i said:
Deletecomment #3:
There is no proof that the U.S. CONSTITUTIONS
• are a valid and enforceable Contract and/or Employment Contract.
• and calling for all proof of same to be entered onto the record before the American people: the inherent authority holders, for us to judge.
comment #4:
the American people have often times not "voluntarily agreed"; instead, we have been forced, under threat/other, up to and including potential loss of our lives: to OBEY men and women potentially Acting upon us unlawfully under Color of Law, Office, and /or Authority.
comment #5:
writing about the foundational freedom Declaration from our fathers and mothers: left for us: our life, freedom, peace, safety, happiness, pursuit of our hopes and dreams, well-being, and more: and for all freedom-loving man who are our friends and neighbors at all places and in all times and seasons/"in perpetuity".
and it is so.
and finally for now:
DeleteCORRECTION to comment #3:
"There is no proof that the U.S. CONSTITUTIONS
• are a valid and enforceable Contract and/or Employment Contract.
• and calling for all proof of same to be entered onto the record before the American people: the inherent authority holders, for us to judge."
**********
the actual comment i:woman posted only called for such said proof/s to be posted on this blog [for NOW], but: from our right, records furnished, if any, will be right-ful-ly required to be right-ly recorded before the people, the inherent authority holders, for us to judge.
and it is so.