Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 5100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Saturday, October 3, 2020

We Don't Use Affidavits --- Ever.

 By Anna Von Reitz

Using an affidavit identifies you as a Legal Person, occupying an "office of personhood" and automatically subjects you to the foreign law and codes of the British Territorial Government.

You have to be part of their government or part of ours, and there is no iffy-andsy-orsie to it.

Most people are desperately trying to get back to being Americans and standing on the land and soil jurisdiction where they belong, but they are also so ignorant and confused that they are constantly "going back into the maze" that we just got them out of, by doing idiot things like issuing "affidavits" when they have been repeatedly, relentlessly and pointedly told that we, Americans, never, ever use "affidavits".

We are not subject to foreign law. We do not occupy offices of personhood in foreign governments. And we do not ever quote Federal Code for any purpose other than reminding our Employees what their published law says about them and their obligations ---- not our obligations--- their obligations.

We, as Americans and as living people, cannot and do not EVER use or issue "affidavits" of any kind. Period.

We use Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit, which simply means that we number the points of our testimony 1, 2, 3, 4.... but we NEVER, EVER submit or create Affidavits of ANY KIND.

Because when we do, we lose everything we have gained in the process of declaring our proper political status, and are "presumed" to be "voluntarily" adopting the status of a British Territorial U.S. Citizen and also voluntarily subjecting ourselves to that foreign law --- instead of standing apart from it and exercising our exemption from it. Which is the whole point!

I am so disgusted, so appalled, when I have told everyone these facts for years on end. Wake to hell up, all of you. Your lives and your country depend on it.

Those who want to play in the Federal Code Sandbox need to go join a District Assembly right now and get to hell out of our State Assemblies. Permanently.

There are two mighty efforts going on --- Employees trying to correct their operation of the District and Municipal Governments, and the Employers putting their government into Session. Never the twain shall meet.

So all you guys who want to correct the District Government -- hop to it. Be my guest. But get out of our assemblies and go join your own. Stop causing confusion. If you want to live under Federal Code, fine. Again, hop to it. You don't belong in any State Assembly. Leave. Don't let the screen door hit you on your way out.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

18 comments:

  1. Thank you again Anna for the reminder, certainly a very important point to remain in the corrected status.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is there anything like the affidavit in our world? One must admit making a statement and it staying as truth until someone refutes it point by point is pretty compelling. Anna any feedback?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Suppose a man had filed affidavits in the public record prior to declaring his American status. Those records are still in the public record. If he reminds someone of those affidavits is he automatically going back into their arena?? Does he have to somehow have to expunge decades of filed affidavits??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Witness Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit. Can only a Living one give witness Testimony?! In deed, Yes. Dead corp(se) cannot give cognizable Testimony. Correct previous affidavits by inserting additional Witness Testimony... phrase. Winners make corrections. Learn & Do Right. Blessings and Love to all. FreeMom7

      Delete
  4. So, Do we NOT use the MAXIM OF LAW? CLAIMS ARE BACKED BY AFFIDAVITS, SWORN UNDER PENALTY OF PAINS AND PERJURY PURSUANT TO THE MAXIMS OF LAW: a) FOR THE TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AFFIDAVIT; b) FOR THE UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS THE TRUTH IN COMMERCE; c) FOR AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT BECOMES THE JUDGEMENT IN COMMERCE; and THEREFORE d) FOR A LIEN OR CLAIM CAN BE SATISFIED ONLY THROUGH REBUTTABLE BY AFFIDAVIT POINT BY POINT, RESOLUTION BY JURY, MANDATORY BINDING ARBITRATION, OR PAYMENT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies



    1. Maxims as a double edge sword if you read and compare them their are ok but; The BAR and courts will not [to often] recognize them or anything in the 3 dimensional world.

      see other below

      Delete
  5. Recently i have read that anything , even if its right, were told to ignore any and all patriot language at all..
    How do you get around that...??
    Most of this system is beyond helping...that is why Trump is going to stop this system completely and shut it down..That corona virus that he and melania supposedly has is a complete hoex..he is planning on completely restureing our system so people never have to guess again.. He will be working from Air Force one and and will shut down the economy starting this sunday or mon.
    This is the latest post by Q...!! Were we go we go TO GET HER...HILLARY.!!

    ReplyDelete

  6. Ha Ha Ha ........this is theres

    AFFIDAVITS - AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE
    SECTIONS 1 - 20

    3 Am. Jur. 2d Affidavits § 1

    American Jurisprudence, Second Edition

    Database updated February 2012
    Affidavits

    Rosemary Gregor, J.D.


    Graduate --- TSFMOG

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. People just dont understand

      This is the illusion, the fictional world crated by PTB and unless you can Prove you are alive everything will fail

      System see everyone as the decedent, debtor, slave, enemy of the state.

      Do your home work and seek the cure.

      No I do not teach there are plenty of the pa[y]triots out there


      Graduate Keep moving Forward

      Delete
  7. Declaration, I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct made with first hand knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You. Annoy be charged in one Jurisdiction and defend in another, I don’t think you’ve been to court enough, I use an Amicus Curia “friend of the Court” affidavit And it has worked 100% of the time, YOU’RE NOT IN AN ARICLE III COURT, it is an ARTICLE II COURT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you mean "you cannot"?

      Delete
    2. I am trying to figure this out - what are practical differences between an Article III court and an Article II court ? Would the Fed. Rules Civil Proc. govern in an Article III court, for example ?

      Delete
    3. I am trying to figure this out - what are practical differences between an Article III court and an Article II court ? Would the Fed. Rules Civil Proc. govern in an Article III court, for example ?

      Delete
    4. I am trying to figure this out - what are practical differences between an Article III court and an Article II court ? Would the Fed. Rules Civil Proc. govern in an Article III court, for example ?

      Delete
  9. Testimonies are related to a will. Affidavits are specific to a performance without emotion. You are clearly wrong. If you were a Judge you would know this.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.