By Anna Von Reitz
What? The US Navy is in conflict of interest? Say what? Believe me, you are not the only ones in a state of shock over this bombshell, but it is nonetheless true.
The US Navy is in conflict of interest. It always has been. It's not the Navy's fault. It's the result of deals that were cut between the Brits and the Americans in the distant past.
After the Revolution and during the peace process, both the British and the Americans were left in a bind.
The Americans had a giant commercial fleet but no navy to protect it. We had raw materials to sell. The British had need for those raw materials for their industrial era factories. Our commercial shipping was being cut to ribbons by privateers, which was a stumbling block for both countries.
So we made a deal with the devil, George III, and the British Monarch became our Trustee "on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways".
When the Navy is at home port, say Fort LeJeune, for the Marine Corps, which is attached to the Navy and under Navy Command, the Navy is free to be American as apple pie, but when it hits the High Seas or ventures up the Mississippi, they come under the jurisdiction of the Queen.
And it has always been that way ---- a residual leftover from the 1700's that has never been addressed again, thanks to the Pope's sleight of hand using the "civil government" to replace the civilian government, and the Queen's cupidity acting in collusion with the Roman Pontiff.
Knowing this key fact about the US Navy helps explain why the Lusitania was sunk in international waters, why the Carrier Fleet left port in Hawaii, but the rest of the Fleet took it in the shorts at Pearl Harbor, and why the Navy has been armed with the latest and greatest scalar people-and-animal killing technology --- and the ground forces have been left to be ---- well, part of the people-and-animal contingent.
This is also why, strangely enough, we can thank God and our lucky stars for our supposed enemies, the Russians and the Chinese, who have developed counter-measures of their own, and who won't stand by helpless should the US Navy deploy their killing technology. Thank God, too, that at least some of us woke up and poked the United Nations where it hurts.
Under numerous United Nations treaties that Britain signed, including treaties involving Environmental Modification and Resonance Weapons and the use of Nanotech and Biologic Vectors in warfare, the US Navy is limited to testing these weapons on the "domestic" population. They were going along testing at will and using our country and our people as Guinea Pigs with a free hand, but then, some of us raised our hands and observed the obvious --- hey, we aren't domestic with respect to them!
So their activities have been curtailed and limited to the narrow zone of land along the sea coast and navigable inland waterways. When you see the vermin in Congress trying to declare a "200 mile inland Constitution-free zone" you now know why.
The Queen has been playing us, and the Lord Mayor of London and the Pope have been playing her.
It so happens that we, The United States of America --- the unincorporated version, have a mutual protection treaty with Russia, which Russia remembers. So as long as these idiots are attacking the actual American People, officials at the UN are forwarding the information to their home governments, and the Russian Government is honoring its obligation.
So, in a nutshell, that is why the US Navy has, through no fault of its own, a built in conflict of interest-- and also the reason why it has so often been abused as the tool to create murder and mayhem in conflict with the actual best interests of America and Americans.
This is also why Mr. Putin keeps a very sharp and jaundiced eye on all US naval operations, including the recent submarine incident; and now that he is fully clued-in, it is also the reason that Donald Trump is better off with Army body guards. No offense to the Marines, no offense to the Navy --- but both are compromised by this conflict of interest.
All the officers throughout the military might as well know it and everyone involved needs to do their best to deal with it, both politically and practically, and also needs to remember that it is the Russians and the Chinese that are holding our backs and preventing the Queen and the Pope from unleashing truly devastating technology against us.
Friendly governments around the world are also protecting us through their diplomatic agencies and recognizing the fact that we are not a domestic population of the United States ----- we belong to The United States of America, instead.
Please note that the Pope and his organization does not allow for any other unincorporated government to remain standing --- including the British Monarchy. So colluding with the Pope on all these various activities is also a game which the British stand to lose.
Finally, everyone from the Pope to the Queen to the US Navy Admirals and everyone else on the planet, needs to understand that the legitimate and actual government of this country is vested in the living people, who as Lawful Persons known as the People of this country, operate the States of the Union --- The United States of America, which is also unincorporated.
The United States of America is the actual name of this country and we are doing nothing wrong, nothing insurrectionist, nothing against any treaty or constitution, by assembling our States and reclaiming our land and other assets from the military Protectorate established by the Pope and the Queen under false pretenses.
We are simply restoring our lawful government and encouraging everyone else worldwide to do the same. Ours is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people ---- not a government of the corporations (persons) by the corporations (Persons) or for the corporations (PERSONS). We are not members of any reptilian religious cult masquerading as "Christianity" and we are not volunteering to serve any such "holy cause" nor donating our assets to the Roman Catholic Church as Paupers in need of any salvation.
Now that we have all of that settled and on the public record, we are prepared to move on ---- and clean up this Mess.
The Jokers in Washington, DC, running the Pope's franchise operations on our soil, need to be held feet first to the fire and told to observe the parameters of their ten miles square kingdom, to get back into their box and stop making false claims in commerce. They owe us a tremendous amount of credit and they owe us the return of all our actual assets, too. Ditto the Queen.
If the American Military doesn't understand anything else, they need to understand that fact and back our lawful and legal claims.
See this article and over 1900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
So when the flag is no longer an American Flag why would anyone believe, when they walk into a room with a fake flag that has decorations on it, why would believe that you are in good clean hands. The first and foremost is responsibility, for those who are getting paid from the hardworking people!So why are they lying straight up? For me the flag has never really been correctly designed, with thirteen strips there should only be 37 states (new states after the original 13), the way it is know thirteen plus 50 will always be 63! So Do Not forget why they have those strips, hint British Colonies HMMM!ReplyDelete
Anyway deny deny deny or If I understand what you just asked then xxxxx!No win no gain, If I understand the written law then just maybe! For me to accept any allegation, would mean I am not paying attention to what I already know.If I am a driver then all my expenses need to be deducted from my earnings from that profession so I make less than I really believe I made, and I smoke and I buy the cigarette taxes with sales tax, and I drink so I need to subtract those sin taxes that I just bought! Look some or all of this probably makes no sense to some but not all. Taxes are just to control the masses, so even the churhes tax you with a donation basket!
"-- we belong to The United States of America, instead."Delete
"So when the flag is no longer an American Flag why would anyone believe, when they walk into a room with a fake flag that has decorations on it, why would believe that you are in good clean hands."
Exactly the point.
All of the claims that have been made have been made with unclean hands, and then plopping down their desecration-of-the-flag, scattering it all over the place!...
...As if staking their false claims with a little cloth on a pole covers their crimes.
No. It just further emphasizes that they have made atrocious claims of owning *people*, and shows them, everywhere we go, to be the criminals they are.
We do not belong to them and
*CORRECTION*/CLARIFICATION AGAIN ANNAMARIA:
WE DO NOT BELONG TO THE USOFA EITHER.
WE CREATED IT.
WE CANNOT *BELONG* TO IT.
IT BELONGS TO *US*.
WE ARE THE SOVEREIGNS.
THE USOFA IS JUST AN AGREEMENT.
I REALIZE YOU HAVE SAID YOU
HAVE OBTAINED SOVEREIGN LETTERS PATENT, BUT
IF YOU DID THAT THEN YOU WOULD HAVE FORMED A DIFFERENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND IT IS NOT THE ONE ESTABLISHED AND STILL STANDING FROM THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. THE ACTUAL USOFA WAS NEVER A COUNTRY, IT WAS A UNION, similar to the EU.
PERHAPS THAT IS WHY YOU DO NOT OFTEN USE THE DECLOFINDEP, BUT KEEP EVERYTHING IN COMMERCE USING LAWFUL PERSONS AND THE CONSTITUTION FOR YOUR VERSION OF THE USA??
I invite comments.
Reply from Anna:Delete
If you ever see a place where I have two documents like two POA cancellations --use the most recent version. Like everything else, we learn and improve as we go. It is also possible that you are looking at POA's designed for two separate purposes. You have to look sharp and consider the context of what you are reading and what I was doing / talking about at the time.
If you read the Treaty of Versailles and the Treaty of Paris (1783) that ended the Revolutionary War, you will see the underlying agreements that ultimately resulted in the Constitutions.
You will learn about the status of the "US" Navy, the role of Westminster, the King's continuing presence as Prince of "the" United States, his role as Arch-Treasurer thereof, and much, much more they never taught us in school.
You have been encouraging the people to hurry up and record their papers, and you generously provided them with the free basic editable forms package which, when completed, would allow them to Assemble with the other American state nationals in order to re-construct The United States of America, unincorporated.
All of my questions, and I think the other peoples' questions, presently, pertain to those same forms.
I am concerned because in the set of forms I printed out, there are TWO *different* Cancellations of POA... in that very same packet.
There are other major concerns too, but that was the thing I noticed first and seems the most obviously "irregular" to me.
In the set of forms I have, the first Cancellation of POA appears in the second paragraph of your Deed of Reconveyance form. That Cancellation appears AFTER the people have already "reconveyed" the property, rather than before "reconveying" it.
Then the second Cancellation of POA is a 'stand-alone' Cancellation form, cancelling all *PRIOR* POAs.
It is placed in sequential order in the packet after the Expatriations form and before your Mandatory Notice of FSIA and NOL form.
Do you see the problems (plural) that I am asking about, regarding just this one specific issue?
I'm not going to enumerate all of the questions since they will be obvious to you from reading this comment; and I want to allow you to say whatever you feel is appropriate before I (and others) begin with the specific, focused questions.
But, just in general:
• why does your free basic packet of editable forms contain a Cancellation of POA *AFTER* the people reconvey property?
• come along right behind it and have a form that Cancels all *PRIOR* Powers of Attorney?
I've already voiced my concerns over the effective day issue.
Thank you. Looking forward to your complete and substantive answer.
This comment has been removed by the author.ReplyDelete
And lets never forget on many products is inserted another racketeering expense we're forced to pay into: RABBINICAL KOSHER TAX EXTORTION RACKET, exclusively paying the jew.Delete
re: the unincorporated version, have a mutual protection treaty with Russia, which Russia remembersReplyDelete
apples and oranges anna. how many "russian" governments have existed between now and then?
where is the evidence of this still in effect?
per international treaty law, when a change of government or similar major event occurs ("voluntary" or otherwise)
-- noone is bound to original treaty (unless spelled out such) but MAY choose to continue. e.g. if 5 nations have a treaty and 3 no longer exist, the remaining 2 may not see any point; conditions have changed, they are no longer bound.
-- when such an event(s) happen, all nations are SUPPOSED TO (but not obligated) to declare and/or "renew" their intentions publically, to avoid such confusion.
how many "change of russia" governments have their been since this agreement was made? off the top of my head:
supposed post-soviet union "perestroika"
so how far back does this treaty go? where has it been renewed (preferably each step of the way, but i suppose a successor could renege and a successor to them could decide to revive such a thing)
such "renewing" is optional, but i see no such declarations on "american" or "russian" side.
in absence of such "renewing" noone is bound -- thats why the recommendation is:
1) specifically indicate in the treaty itself what happens if conditions change/one party no longer exists due to war/etc.
2) after something happens, and dust has settled (e.g. war is over) declare your intentions, even if you don't "have to", else the treaty sits in a state of uncertainness
i very much doubt kerensky and/or bolsheviks and/or putin ever stated anywhere they are bound by dictates of the a tsar.
if they did such, please point where.
during a "war" same thing applies, even if parties are still standing. the bolsheviks were at "war" with "capitalists" which trump claims "america" is.
is that your "america" or his fake "federal citizens only" one?
when did the "communists" or "socialists" ever declare peace? perestroika is a leninist tactic. "cold war" implies even in absence of declared "war" "war" may yet still continue.
your story doesn't add up anna. trump implies the non "capitalists" are still at "war"
gorbachev has said perestroika is merely a show, there is no real abandonment of aims.
so "russia" is still at "war" with all "capitalists", notwithstanding KGB putin's acting.
during a "war" even if such treaty was still passed forward through all the various changes of governments/wars between, where has it been "renewed" ever?
you are expecting putin, who is at "war" with "capitalism" to come to aid of trump and his version of "america"
seems to me more like the "communists" are seeking to use the useful idiot "americans" (of trump's definition, or anna's) and temporarily will "protect" you so long as they get the long-term "win"
china plays the same game it seems. north korea too.Delete
publically proclaiming they are becoming "more capitalist" but they simultaneously still call themselves "communist"
so the "communist" world is still at "war" with so-called "capitalist" america.
ask a modern-say "socialist" and they will say the federal reserve is not "socialist". edward mandell house implies it was the realization of "socialism as dreamed by karl marx". they also funded/aided bolshevism (and others).
lenin said a central bank is 90% of "socializing" a country.
where is the non-"communist"-controlled "russia" who is not at "war" with america?
This is an issue we are trying to deal with right now... Having Annamaria substantiate her information.Delete
If it is merely her opinion, then for pity sake just say so.
The fact that Annamaria put TWO different Cancellations of POA in her freebasicpacket of records she is generously allowing people to use, needs to be fully explained since unlike just merely giving our opinions on here, like we all do, recording potentially faulty andor documents with "muddy" wordings could be disastrous!!
*****THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FORMED UNDER THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE IS NOT A COUNTRY AND HAS NEVER, EVER BEEN A *COUNTRY******ReplyDelete
It is a union; a uniting of the several States that are all free and independent nations called States.
THE OLDER PEOPLE KNOW THIS.
EVERYONE USED TO KNOW THAT THE STATE ARE, NOT WERE, *ARE* SEVER-AL, SEVERED, SEPARATE NATIONS.
The EU is another such union of individual nations.
The United Arab Emirates is yet another.
All of these unions are made up of SEPERATE states or nations, generally having:
1. a common border
2. engaging in trade and travel together.
THIS IS SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPER IMPORTANT:
THIS IS THE KEY.
THIS IS "THE BRAKES" ON THE CAR CAREENING OVER THE CLIFF:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT AND NEVER HAS BEEN A COUNTRY.
YOUR NATIONALITY IS YOUR STATE!!!
YOUR COUNTRY IS YOUR STATE!!!
DON'T FORGET IT.
EVER. EVER. EVER.:
• THE UNITED STATED OF AMERICA FORMED UNDER THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, IS NOT A COUNTRY OR NATION.
• IT IS A UNION.
• YOUR STATE IS YOUR COUNTRY/NATION.
Neither the English Monarchy nor Rome have ever, ever, ever, ever, ever been a/the *Military Protectorate* for the people of the several States of the true United States of America.
"The Military" deals with being on the land and soil only.
Navy is completely different.
We are wrongly indoctrinated to call everything "the Military", but it's not all "the Military".
Only the ARMY is "the Military" and the State (national) and county militias are also the "military";
The people themselves ARE also "the MILITARY".
The Navy is not the military, its the Navy.
It is not even allowed to be on the land and soil, except to replenish.
It has absolutely no authority whatsoever of any kind at all *on* the land and soil or to operate on the land and soil.
Maritime is strictly limited to the shores, NOT: 1, 100, 200, or more miles inland... And even then is.limited to that which pertains to navigation and COMMERCE.
WHEN "the Navy" is on our land and soil, it is:
2. Subject to American traditional militia andor non-militia common law authority.
They are only here as the peoples' "guest": for "r&r", replenishment or maintenance.
The State and county militias and our own ARMY, plus the people themselves: from home to home, neighbor to neighbor, berg to berg, village to village, town to town, county to county, State to State: are the sole and exclusive lawful and authorized protective forces on the land and soil!!
We, the living American state nationals and the State Citizens, Annamaria, ARE the lawful Military Protectorate.
The ONLY lawful Military Protectorate.
Not anyone else.
That duty/power was never, ever, ever GIVEN over to anyone!! Ever.
Show proof, please; and if you refuse to respond to my polite request, then I place you under lawful DEMAND: that if you disagree with what i have said herein, annamaria, to immediately show on Paul's blog herein, where that duty and power was ever lawfully assigned to anyone else.
I'm waiting for your answer.
Something tells me that you are silently, without direct, clear and therefore, full, disclosure, making the claim that you are acting in your tenth amendment to the Corporate Constitution's judicial capacity to make these claims for ALL of the states of the union and for the people.
I hope that is incorrect.
I'm not making a judgment, even if it might sound like I am.
I am asking for the correct information together with the correct intent of your publications.
You presently appear, to me, to be claiming to be acting lawfully under the Corporate Constitution in your claimed "10th Amendment" judicial role, making declarations that are outside of, and are also out of accord with, what our founding papers, the Declaration of Independence says;
...And then, since there is presently no other land and soil State-elected sitting judge (i believe you have said something similar), to oppose you, you are, what??...using Alaska State's rather unique government system that is similar to Louisiana's, to make broad, sweeping changes to the foundational principles of our intended governmental system for all of the States??
If that is true, let me assure you that our, the living peoples', rights precede, and do also supercede, the 10th or any other Article of the Bill of Rights or any other man-made construct!
The people retained those rights, properties and "statuses" for themselves PRIOR to/*before* any Constitutions or Bills of Rights:
It is right there in paragraph two, right along with the rest of our natural, God/creator-given, UNalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence, where it says that we will set up the kind of government system we believe to be most likely to secure our *SAFETY* and happiness.
Every thing on earth has an inborn and natural right to protect their family, their home, their work, and themselves: beavers, bees, ants, bears, nearly everything protects its own, takes care of its own.
So while the fact may be true that the American commercial fleets in the 1700's needed protection on the High Seas and Nav.InlandWaterway, (I presently believe that to be true) there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, AB•SO•LUTE•LY NO•THING ANYWHERE, EVER, WHERE THERE WAS EVER TO BE A MILITARY PROTECTORATE ON OUR LAND AND SOIL....
as a matter of fact, such thing was specifically
ABSOLUTELY SPECIFICALLY FORBIDDEN:
the Union and the States actually
FORBADE "STANDING ARMIES".
Because it is so very very important, I'm going to repeat it and strongly suggest for your own safety and well-being that you stick this in your brain--right there along with your knowledge that
1. The United States of America is NOT a "country" and
2. Your nationality is your State, that:
3. The United States of America and the States FORBADE STANDING ARMIES.
The longest an army could be raised on the land and soil was for two years.
What we did and still do have is a what is so-called a "Ready Militia", but really, it's even simpler than that:
All men and their sons over the age of 15? were to have protection, know how to use it and be ready at all times to walk out the front door with it. A lot of men kept them AT the door or over the fireplace. It's called "At-the-ready".
I do affectionately, and not out of necessity or compulsion, but for love and honor and respect for our young people, testify that: being a daughter, growing up in the nineteen-fifties and on into the early sixties, that the daughters i knew and was friends with, were routinely all taught how to handle protection.ReplyDelete
We were, just as a matter of course-of-life-learning, taught by our dads and grampas, brothers, boyfriends, husbands, how to handle protection: be confident, be safe, be cool-headed and in control with it.
From just going along with dad on the men's Saturday morning hunting trip at eight years old or so, to getting to the point of deciding, "I'd like to try that" and starting to do target practice with dad and gramps using a green bean can on a stick stuck in the ground for the target... The daughters as well as the sons were taught how to STAND, if ever necessary...
[And how to get a squirrel for dinner if the men stayed at the pool hall too long!! (Kidding... But it coulda happened :).)]
The point being that less than about 50 years ago learning protection of self, family and property was just a part of growing up for nearly all American sons and daughters.
Knowing how to responsibly and safely defend oneself and ones family and property was very simply: just part of growing up in America.
We are so nice.
We have to start the push-back.
In honor and peacefulness.
And make quick work of it.
They've mistaken our kindness for weakness.
And they are too stupid to accept correction.