
by Anna Von Reitz
The New Republic v. The Old Republic: 
 An Analogous Story 
You decide to take your wife out for 
her birthday to the finest restaurant in town.  At first everything seems 
normal.  Somewhere between the second and third course, however, the head waiter 
and two of the waitresses strip naked.  They just go on about their jobs, but 
you can tell from your wife's face and the silent glances being passed by other 
patrons that no, you are not losing your mind and imagining things. Some other 
naked waiters roll curtain partititions in, sectioning off a portion of the 
restaurant and soon, behind that flimsey partition, a real live orgy begins.  
You know what is going on.  Everyone in the room knows what is going on.  You 
can hear it--- the thumping and bumping, the sex talk, the moaning and sighing. 
It's obvious, and yet, except for the naked waitresses, everything on your side 
of the restaurant goes on as normal. 
You pass glances with your wife, and 
with the guy at the table next to you. He shrugs and goes on eating. You find 
yourself wondering things like--- are orgies against the law in California?  
Does it matter if its a public or private orgy?  How do you define "public" and 
"private"?  You are in shock, but your salad is served and you pick up your 
fork.  Your wife follows your lead.  Just as you are beginning to taste the 
tomato and wrap your head around this circumstance, two uniformed policemen show 
up.  You think--- "Thank God!"  You assume that they know the law and are going 
to address the situation, but no, to your amazement, they strip naked and 
disappear behind the partition, too. 
The Governor and his wife and a group 
of celebrities arrive, the mayor of your fair city---- and they all do the same 
thing.  They all strip naked in front of your incredulous eyes and disappear 
behind that partititon.  Another naked waitress appears and asks if you would 
like dessert?  From the catatonic look on your wife's face you shake your head 
and ask for the bill.  When the waitress returns with your credit card she leans 
way over in a suggestive manner and puts her naked nipple about three inches 
away from your lips.  Your wife looks like she is about to stand up and smack 
someone--- either the waitress or you, and you aren't sure 
which. 
Driving home your mind is still in a 
welter. The whole thing is so bizarre. You look up the California Statutes and 
yes, it would appear that orgies are illegal, but who would you tell?
The police -- at least some of them -- are obviously participating, and perhaps more important, so is their boss and their bosses' boss. The crime has been committed. You are a witness to it, but what can you do about it? You are just one man and you have no public office or authority---and those you elected and entrusted to enforce the law are the ones breaking it.
The police -- at least some of them -- are obviously participating, and perhaps more important, so is their boss and their bosses' boss. The crime has been committed. You are a witness to it, but what can you do about it? You are just one man and you have no public office or authority---and those you elected and entrusted to enforce the law are the ones breaking it.
That's the situtation we are all in 
with the Fed and the IMF and the members of Congress.  We know they've broken 
the law and also failed to enforce the existing law ten ways to Sunday, but 
nobody knows what to do about it.  Even after you come out of your daze and 
admit to yourself that you saw what you saw and heard what you heard, who is 
going to believe you?  And once you do convince your friends and neighbors that 
you aren't just imagining it, you are still stuck with the question of what can 
you do about it?  
You go back to the restaurant despite 
your better judgment (and your wife's objections) to snoop around.  The 
waitresses are wearing their clothes and business appears normal.  You get one 
of the women to talk to you and to your amazement, she tells you that this 
happens once a month the day after the New Moon. You ask her--- doesn't it 
concern you that this is against the law in the State of California?   She 
blinks and says, yes, but it's not against the law in Anaheim. Anaheim passed a 
Private Law Statute legalizing orgies once a month, so it's perfectly 
legal. 
Again, you mind reels.  And in the 
days to come, you learn that the Governor suggested this to the Mayor and the 
Mayor defined a special population of the people living within Anaheim city 
limits as the voters, and they all happened to be porn shop owners and 
prostitutes and pimps, so of course, the measure passed by a large margin. It 
appears to be perfectly legal and yet it is undeniably against the Public 
Law. 
This is analogous to the whole 
situation we face in this country, where private corporate law is being enforced 
using public funds, but the Public and Organic Law of this country is being 
ignored or enforced only on a "discretionary" basis. 
As your research continues you learn 
that the orgies are all paid for out of public funds.  The restaurant has a 
contract to provide the service once a month. All the restaurant employees who 
choose to participate are hired as special consultants and paid $25,000 a month 
plus a uniform expense allowance of $5000 each for one night of "work" per 
month.  You keep collecting the black and white proof of all this and nobody can 
believe it.  They look at the documents.  They hear the testimony, but it all 
has an air of unreality to it.  
As you proceed along your path as one 
of the Tin Hat Brigade, the shock begins to wear off and the certainty that you 
have been grossly disserved and defrauded grows. A sense of outrage takes root.  
You find out that the Governor has committed gross crimes and so has the 
President of the corporation he works for.  You find out that the people you 
elected in good faith to serve in public office are serving in private corporate 
offices instead, and the courts and judges and police all work for this same 
corporation ---so they aren't going to stick their necks out and enforce the 
Public Law, either. 
There's nobody left to do it but you, 
Jaimie. Even though you go on paying the salaries of all these scum bags, you 
have to do to the job you hired them to do. 
If you want the Public Law enforced, 
you have to organize your friends and neighbors and form a Jural Assembly and 
operate your county government on the land jurisdiction of California.  Why?  
Because back in the 1950's and 60's the crooks operating the then-State of 
California organization agreed to incorporate that organization as a franchise 
of the UNITED STATES, (INC.)  They did this so they could receive kick-backs 
called "Federal Revenue Sharing" and "Block Grants".  In doing this, they merged 
their version of state and county government into the federal government 
structure and destroyed the Checks and Balances required by our system of 
government and did an end-run around our Constitution----- and nobody said a 
word. 
They all just considered it a private 
business management decision. The rest of us call it 
treason. 
Your mind is still reeling when you 
learn that in addition to all this, the parent corporation colluded with its new 
franchises calling themselves the "State of...." and the "STATE OF....." and the 
"COUNTY of...."    to "register" you as property belonging to them---- literally 
claimed you as chattel backing their debts. They seized control of your name 
using a bogus undisclosed private adhesion contract forced upon your unknowing 
Mother at the hospital when you were born and they charged your credit to the 
limit when you were still just a babe in your cradle. When they had exhausted 
your credit, they started extrapolating their debts onto the backs of your 
unborn children.  They enslaved you under a private corporate system of "law" 
despite the actual Public Law against slavery, just like the "private law" 
allowing orgies in Anaheim. 
In this case, the insolvent UNITED 
STATES and its parent corporation, the French-chartered IMF, are utterly 
responsible for these outrages, and so is the French Government that chartered 
the IMF and allowed it to commit all these crimes on American soil and 
throughout the world. 
So all this has been done by a 
private, mostly foreign-owned corporation merely under contract to provide your 
state of the Union with stipulated governmental services, and while they have 
been doing that, they have also been pillaging your wealth and mischaracterizing 
your political status and corrupting your courts and operating in complete 
disrespect of the Public and Organic Law of this country.  
No wonder then, that when the IMF 
sponsored UNITED STATES went insolvent, those of us who were awake and proudly 
wearing our Tin Hats wasted no time in declining the French Government's offers 
to create a "NEW REPUBLIC" for us, and instead announced to the world that we 
have made other arrangements and are restoring our rightful government--- the 
Old Republic, thank you very much--- on the land of these United States. 
 
We are no longer going to pay taxes, 
tithes or fees for services that we are not receiving.  And we aren't going to 
patronize organizations that fail to operate in good faith and in accord with 
our Public and Organic Laws. 
If this is all just "business" and 
"business management decisions" then consider that the actual beneficaries of 
the Public Trusts have put their feet down and said in very clear terms that the 
Public and Organic Law of this country is to be enforced against all private 
corporate "law" that isn't in full compliance with it and that all the whores in 
Anaheim are officially off the public payroll.  And although we have paid off 
the "National Debt" of the United States with our equal "National Credit"----- 
there's going to be a helluva charge back for all the unauthorized charges to 
our accounts.  
Our contract with the world is The 
Declaration of Independence.  Our union of states is The Articles of 
Confederation 1781.  Our Public Trust is the United States Trust 1779.  We are 
the people of the fifty sovereign nation-states: Alaskans, Ohioans, Virginians, 
Nevadans---- not some Euro-Trash "inhabitants" merely "residing" in our states 
under treaties that they are ignoring and commercial contracts that they have 
abused and dishonored. 
Every "law enforcement" agent and 
every "judge" in every administrative "court" and Admiralty court in America 
needs to be informed of these facts via Judicial Notice.  Every politician, too. 
If they are too stupid or too corrupt to grasp the facts any other way, perhaps 
this little anecdotal story of a birthday dinner gone astray will wake them up 
and convince them that their actual bosses are home to stay and the party is 
definitely over. 
 ---------------------------------------
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 
See this article and over 200 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
 

 
In 2012, a group of 9-11 activists collaborated to determine the best course for getting justice for the 9-11 crimes. It is our sense that the truth of 9-11 is the Achilles heel of the cabal now running roughshod over the world.
ReplyDeleteOrganizing grand juries in counties to hear evidence and bring indictments seems a good test of the 'rule of law' structures set up by the founding fathers.
If angels become as well organized as the devils, we angels can solve this.
Is there a collaboration possibility between the makers of 911JusticeCampaign.org and Anna's seminal works to restore our Republic?
I believe our case C16-626JCC against four defendants, filed in U.S. District in Seattle, Robert Finbar Brown v. PeaceHealth St. Joseph's Hospital, Pope Francis, Governor Inslee and Whatcom County will take down "Death with Dignity" and shock people's senses, U.S. Supreme Court caselaw has upheld historical references in Glucksberg to the standard of doctors preserving life, not assisting in self death, suicide, yet here it's alleged facts with prima facie evidence that prove church and state are working against the sanctity of life, knowingly condoning outright murder by doctors and hospital risk management.
ReplyDeleteI hope you fail. I want the choice of when and how I die once I know that I face a black and pointless future that will end in a painful death. You have no right to try to take that from me because of your hard-assed, self-righteous beliefs.
DeleteI'm with you!
DeleteIt's not that I want to take away painless death, but you have been deceived by the fuzzy word "choice" that has murdered millions of innocent babies, these death mongers want you to think your going to die in excruciating pain unless you vote for DWD, nothing is farthest from the truth, if they revoked those statutes today, you still wouldn't die in excruciationg pain, the only difference is you would die when someone else wanted or needed to have you die, even if you wanted to live. Regardless of your choice, if they made a mistake and they're going to be liable civilly or criminally, you will die. Do you want someone else to have their chose, sounds like you don't. That is what they did to my wife with a DNR she was forced to sign according to an eyewitness, it was a criminal act. Responders finished the job by puncturing her neck over her internal jugular vein when she didn't die. Something they don't tell you, if you didn't die on their schedule, there are other choices, you can starve to death or die faster by them putting a tent and pumping in helium, which can be horrifying for both the victim and witnesses. As the son of an undertaker, I would not want to see a person die like that, facial expressions reveal whether they died peacefully or not. I will stop here, if you don't want to die those barbaric ways you want to forget DWD, they, not you, will have to choice, not you, and it's not pretty. If they allow my blog, read what they did to my wife in the right column. I only want to prevent others from dying from these lies. God Bless. Talk Platelets
DeleteBut isn't the alternative that they plug you into some machine?
DeleteOkay this is just a repeat of the same stuff over and over again. This woman, or at this point I'm starting to believe this is a group using the Anna Judge thing as a front...is claiming they have been doing research for forty years. Listen... I'm not being a troll, a shill, a naysayer, hater or whatever, but WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? WHERE IS THE SMOKING GUN? You can not expect average, hard working people...some with small children... to put their necks on the line with no proof. I mean that is insanity. This Judge Anna woman's friend, this Judge Steve Curry is in jail, or was. I don't know the status of that. In any event...this was someone who processed to know "the truth" and they are locked up. Someone who did all the changing their "political status" stuff. WELL?!!! How's that working out? You can't ask people to go to jail for this crap unless you have a remedy to get them out, and you have THE ABSOLUTE DOCUMENTED PROOF to back up your claims. No one will ever follow this except a small fringe. I mean for all people know you could be a shill put in place to try and get people put in jail. Maybe you're getting a commission. Who knows! You talk an awful lot of smack, but you ain't providing no documentation to back it up. Just weird sex analogies. The more I delve into all this...it sounds like a mishmash of Eustace Mullins and G Edward Griffin with some other well known "conspiracy" theorists. I am not trying to stir up...well, you know. I want to know the truth! If I'm to go to bat, however, and put my a## on the line, I want documents, or one document I can hold up and say... You see this mother fu##er? You are done! You provide me REAL, FACTUAL EVIDENCE, and I will fight harder than anyone you have ever seen. Otherwise this is just silly hearsay nonsense to me.
ReplyDeleteI understand. This is the most confusing time in the history of man because there is so much conflicting information. I know that it's a possibility that when one fills out all the forms, or hell, even when one writes one's congressman, that person could be identifying themselves for a game of Illuminati whack-a-mole and buying a future ticket to a FEMA camp. I also know that selling freedom for security results in neither, but few people will jump without being quite sure that their course is even the path to freedom.
Delete