Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

"Neu Republique" v. Old Republic--- Another Birthday Party Disaster by Judge Anna

by Anna Von Reitz

The New Republic v. The Old Republic:  An Analogous Story 

You decide to take your wife out for her birthday to the finest restaurant in town.  At first everything seems normal.  Somewhere between the second and third course, however, the head waiter and two of the waitresses strip naked.  They just go on about their jobs, but you can tell from your wife's face and the silent glances being passed by other patrons that no, you are not losing your mind and imagining things. Some other naked waiters roll curtain partititions in, sectioning off a portion of the restaurant and soon, behind that flimsey partition, a real live orgy begins.  You know what is going on.  Everyone in the room knows what is going on.  You can hear it--- the thumping and bumping, the sex talk, the moaning and sighing. It's obvious, and yet, except for the naked waitresses, everything on your side of the restaurant goes on as normal. 

You pass glances with your wife, and with the guy at the table next to you. He shrugs and goes on eating. You find yourself wondering things like--- are orgies against the law in California?  Does it matter if its a public or private orgy?  How do you define "public" and "private"?  You are in shock, but your salad is served and you pick up your fork.  Your wife follows your lead.  Just as you are beginning to taste the tomato and wrap your head around this circumstance, two uniformed policemen show up.  You think--- "Thank God!"  You assume that they know the law and are going to address the situation, but no, to your amazement, they strip naked and disappear behind the partition, too. 

The Governor and his wife and a group of celebrities arrive, the mayor of your fair city---- and they all do the same thing.  They all strip naked in front of your incredulous eyes and disappear behind that partititon.  Another naked waitress appears and asks if you would like dessert?  From the catatonic look on your wife's face you shake your head and ask for the bill.  When the waitress returns with your credit card she leans way over in a suggestive manner and puts her naked nipple about three inches away from your lips.  Your wife looks like she is about to stand up and smack someone--- either the waitress or you, and you aren't sure which. 

Driving home your mind is still in a welter. The whole thing is so bizarre. You look up the California Statutes and yes, it would appear that orgies are illegal, but who would you tell?

 The police -- at least some of them -- are obviously participating, and perhaps more important, so is their boss and their bosses' boss. The crime has been committed.  You are a witness to it, but what can you do about it?  You are just one man and you have no public office or authority---and those you elected and entrusted to enforce the law are the ones breaking it. 

That's the situtation we are all in with the Fed and the IMF and the members of Congress.  We know they've broken the law and also failed to enforce the existing law ten ways to Sunday, but nobody knows what to do about it.  Even after you come out of your daze and admit to yourself that you saw what you saw and heard what you heard, who is going to believe you?  And once you do convince your friends and neighbors that you aren't just imagining it, you are still stuck with the question of what can you do about it?  

You go back to the restaurant despite your better judgment (and your wife's objections) to snoop around.  The waitresses are wearing their clothes and business appears normal.  You get one of the women to talk to you and to your amazement, she tells you that this happens once a month the day after the New Moon. You ask her--- doesn't it concern you that this is against the law in the State of California?   She blinks and says, yes, but it's not against the law in Anaheim. Anaheim passed a Private Law Statute legalizing orgies once a month, so it's perfectly legal. 

Again, you mind reels.  And in the days to come, you learn that the Governor suggested this to the Mayor and the Mayor defined a special population of the people living within Anaheim city limits as the voters, and they all happened to be porn shop owners and prostitutes and pimps, so of course, the measure passed by a large margin. It appears to be perfectly legal and yet it is undeniably against the Public Law. 

This is analogous to the whole situation we face in this country, where private corporate law is being enforced using public funds, but the Public and Organic Law of this country is being ignored or enforced only on a "discretionary" basis. 

As your research continues you learn that the orgies are all paid for out of public funds.  The restaurant has a contract to provide the service once a month. All the restaurant employees who choose to participate are hired as special consultants and paid $25,000 a month plus a uniform expense allowance of $5000 each for one night of "work" per month.  You keep collecting the black and white proof of all this and nobody can believe it.  They look at the documents.  They hear the testimony, but it all has an air of unreality to it.  

As you proceed along your path as one of the Tin Hat Brigade, the shock begins to wear off and the certainty that you have been grossly disserved and defrauded grows. A sense of outrage takes root.  You find out that the Governor has committed gross crimes and so has the President of the corporation he works for.  You find out that the people you elected in good faith to serve in public office are serving in private corporate offices instead, and the courts and judges and police all work for this same corporation ---so they aren't going to stick their necks out and enforce the Public Law, either. 

There's nobody left to do it but you, Jaimie. Even though you go on paying the salaries of all these scum bags, you have to do to the job you hired them to do. 

If you want the Public Law enforced, you have to organize your friends and neighbors and form a Jural Assembly and operate your county government on the land jurisdiction of California.  Why?  Because back in the 1950's and 60's the crooks operating the then-State of California organization agreed to incorporate that organization as a franchise of the UNITED STATES, (INC.)  They did this so they could receive kick-backs called "Federal Revenue Sharing" and "Block Grants".  In doing this, they merged their version of state and county government into the federal government structure and destroyed the Checks and Balances required by our system of government and did an end-run around our Constitution----- and nobody said a word. 

They all just considered it a private business management decision. The rest of us call it treason. 

Your mind is still reeling when you learn that in addition to all this, the parent corporation colluded with its new franchises calling themselves the "State of...." and the "STATE OF....." and the "COUNTY of...."    to "register" you as property belonging to them---- literally claimed you as chattel backing their debts. They seized control of your name using a bogus undisclosed private adhesion contract forced upon your unknowing Mother at the hospital when you were born and they charged your credit to the limit when you were still just a babe in your cradle. When they had exhausted your credit, they started extrapolating their debts onto the backs of your unborn children.  They enslaved you under a private corporate system of "law" despite the actual Public Law against slavery, just like the "private law" allowing orgies in Anaheim. 

In this case, the insolvent UNITED STATES and its parent corporation, the French-chartered IMF, are utterly responsible for these outrages, and so is the French Government that chartered the IMF and allowed it to commit all these crimes on American soil and throughout the world. 

So all this has been done by a private, mostly foreign-owned corporation merely under contract to provide your state of the Union with stipulated governmental services, and while they have been doing that, they have also been pillaging your wealth and mischaracterizing your political status and corrupting your courts and operating in complete disrespect of the Public and Organic Law of this country.  

No wonder then, that when the IMF sponsored UNITED STATES went insolvent, those of us who were awake and proudly wearing our Tin Hats wasted no time in declining the French Government's offers to create a "NEW REPUBLIC" for us, and instead announced to the world that we have made other arrangements and are restoring our rightful government--- the Old Republic, thank you very much--- on the land of these United States.  

We are no longer going to pay taxes, tithes or fees for services that we are not receiving.  And we aren't going to patronize organizations that fail to operate in good faith and in accord with our Public and Organic Laws. 

If this is all just "business" and "business management decisions" then consider that the actual beneficaries of the Public Trusts have put their feet down and said in very clear terms that the Public and Organic Law of this country is to be enforced against all private corporate "law" that isn't in full compliance with it and that all the whores in Anaheim are officially off the public payroll.  And although we have paid off the "National Debt" of the United States with our equal "National Credit"----- there's going to be a helluva charge back for all the unauthorized charges to our accounts.  

Our contract with the world is The Declaration of Independence.  Our union of states is The Articles of Confederation 1781.  Our Public Trust is the United States Trust 1779.  We are the people of the fifty sovereign nation-states: Alaskans, Ohioans, Virginians, Nevadans---- not some Euro-Trash "inhabitants" merely "residing" in our states under treaties that they are ignoring and commercial contracts that they have abused and dishonored. 

Every "law enforcement" agent and every "judge" in every administrative "court" and Admiralty court in America needs to be informed of these facts via Judicial Notice.  Every politician, too. If they are too stupid or too corrupt to grasp the facts any other way, perhaps this little anecdotal story of a birthday dinner gone astray will wake them up and convince them that their actual bosses are home to stay and the party is definitely over. 
See this article and over 200 others on Anna's website
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 


  1. In 2012, a group of 9-11 activists collaborated to determine the best course for getting justice for the 9-11 crimes. It is our sense that the truth of 9-11 is the Achilles heel of the cabal now running roughshod over the world.

    Organizing grand juries in counties to hear evidence and bring indictments seems a good test of the 'rule of law' structures set up by the founding fathers.

    If angels become as well organized as the devils, we angels can solve this.

    Is there a collaboration possibility between the makers of and Anna's seminal works to restore our Republic?

  2. I believe our case C16-626JCC against four defendants, filed in U.S. District in Seattle, Robert Finbar Brown v. PeaceHealth St. Joseph's Hospital, Pope Francis, Governor Inslee and Whatcom County will take down "Death with Dignity" and shock people's senses, U.S. Supreme Court caselaw has upheld historical references in Glucksberg to the standard of doctors preserving life, not assisting in self death, suicide, yet here it's alleged facts with prima facie evidence that prove church and state are working against the sanctity of life, knowingly condoning outright murder by doctors and hospital risk management.

    1. I hope you fail. I want the choice of when and how I die once I know that I face a black and pointless future that will end in a painful death. You have no right to try to take that from me because of your hard-assed, self-righteous beliefs.

    2. It's not that I want to take away painless death, but you have been deceived by the fuzzy word "choice" that has murdered millions of innocent babies, these death mongers want you to think your going to die in excruciating pain unless you vote for DWD, nothing is farthest from the truth, if they revoked those statutes today, you still wouldn't die in excruciationg pain, the only difference is you would die when someone else wanted or needed to have you die, even if you wanted to live. Regardless of your choice, if they made a mistake and they're going to be liable civilly or criminally, you will die. Do you want someone else to have their chose, sounds like you don't. That is what they did to my wife with a DNR she was forced to sign according to an eyewitness, it was a criminal act. Responders finished the job by puncturing her neck over her internal jugular vein when she didn't die. Something they don't tell you, if you didn't die on their schedule, there are other choices, you can starve to death or die faster by them putting a tent and pumping in helium, which can be horrifying for both the victim and witnesses. As the son of an undertaker, I would not want to see a person die like that, facial expressions reveal whether they died peacefully or not. I will stop here, if you don't want to die those barbaric ways you want to forget DWD, they, not you, will have to choice, not you, and it's not pretty. If they allow my blog, read what they did to my wife in the right column. I only want to prevent others from dying from these lies. God Bless. Talk Platelets

    3. But isn't the alternative that they plug you into some machine?

  3. Okay this is just a repeat of the same stuff over and over again. This woman, or at this point I'm starting to believe this is a group using the Anna Judge thing as a claiming they have been doing research for forty years. Listen... I'm not being a troll, a shill, a naysayer, hater or whatever, but WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? WHERE IS THE SMOKING GUN? You can not expect average, hard working people...some with small children... to put their necks on the line with no proof. I mean that is insanity. This Judge Anna woman's friend, this Judge Steve Curry is in jail, or was. I don't know the status of that. In any event...this was someone who processed to know "the truth" and they are locked up. Someone who did all the changing their "political status" stuff. WELL?!!! How's that working out? You can't ask people to go to jail for this crap unless you have a remedy to get them out, and you have THE ABSOLUTE DOCUMENTED PROOF to back up your claims. No one will ever follow this except a small fringe. I mean for all people know you could be a shill put in place to try and get people put in jail. Maybe you're getting a commission. Who knows! You talk an awful lot of smack, but you ain't providing no documentation to back it up. Just weird sex analogies. The more I delve into all sounds like a mishmash of Eustace Mullins and G Edward Griffin with some other well known "conspiracy" theorists. I am not trying to stir up...well, you know. I want to know the truth! If I'm to go to bat, however, and put my a## on the line, I want documents, or one document I can hold up and say... You see this mother fu##er? You are done! You provide me REAL, FACTUAL EVIDENCE, and I will fight harder than anyone you have ever seen. Otherwise this is just silly hearsay nonsense to me.

    1. I understand. This is the most confusing time in the history of man because there is so much conflicting information. I know that it's a possibility that when one fills out all the forms, or hell, even when one writes one's congressman, that person could be identifying themselves for a game of Illuminati whack-a-mole and buying a future ticket to a FEMA camp. I also know that selling freedom for security results in neither, but few people will jump without being quite sure that their course is even the path to freedom.


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.