Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Friday, January 8, 2016

Questions for Judge Anna - Was common law shut down years ago in America?

Here is the email thread with the question.

Just curious. 
I very much appreciated this article. This comment appeared under the article by Judge Anna Von Reitz but it was never addressed.

awesome but wasnt common law effectively taken out around 33/38 erie pennsylvania case etc also with the trading with the enemy/emergency banking acts and are we not under military rule and governments

I am not an attorney but think it is vitally important to explain because the whole of the Judge's article revolves around this point regarding Common Law which it seems was taken out years ago. This would be very basic for a judge to know and would ultimately make her argument null and void. 

All of the flags with gold rim, now show we are under Maritime law but this too was not noted nor was the comment answered. 

Could you please elucidate as to how this fact -- which contradicts what Judge Anna Von Reitz is writing -- could have gone unnoticed?
I appreciate your attention to this as it is not making sense.
Regards,
Leslie

awesome but wasnt common law effectively taken out around 33/38 erie pennsylvania case etc also with the trading with the enemy/emergency banking acts and are we not under military rule and governments
And here is Judge Anna's Answer:

Answer for Leslie-- you are recalling a 1938 case known as Thompkins v. Erie Railroad in which the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that the Federal Government has no such thing as General Common Law and is therefore incompetent to fulfill Article VII. 

As the rats continued their efforts to take over our courts and our country they adopted the one form of euphemistically named "common law" they had in their bag of tricks, which is known variously as "Special Admiralty" and "Executive Admiralty" and most tellingly as "martial common law"--- that is the form of the law being practiced under the gold fringed flag. 

To bring you under this jurisdiction they have to pretend that you are a "rebel" and "enemy combatant" instead of admitting who you really are. 

This form of law was adopted in the wake of the Civil War. Normal courts had been shut down in eleven Southern States. Congress told the military commanders of these "districts" to appoint whatever civilians they trusted to run local "tribunals" to deal with "rebels". 

This created the infamous Carpetbagger Era. 

Federal United States Citizens came from the North and ran these courts in a profoundly criminal fashion-- arbitrarily stealing the property of the Southerners under color of law. 

The same thing has been done here and now. 

As the county and state courts made the mistake of incorporating, they became franchises of the federal government corporation. As a result, we no longer had real state or county courts. Since about 1965 virtually all the courts in America pretending to be "state" or "county" courts are franchises run by the U.S. District Courts and they are ALL Federal Courts--- Federal State Courts, Federal County Courts--- all operating as federal corporation franchises, all operating in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea. 

So-- what do you do when the Constitution requires that the people have access to Common Law and there is no Federal General Common Law and almost all the state and county courts in the country have either stupidly or treasonously been incorporated and thereby removed to federal jurisdiction? 

You dig up "martial common law" and you make up the euphemistic names for it-- "Special Admiralty" and "Executive Admiralty" and you foist this known evil off on the trusting innocent American People and use it as a means to defraud and railroad them and plunder their estates and private and public resources. 

Luckily for us, there was a U.S. Supreme Court case--Milligan Ex Parte in 1866, which addressed this situation and that decision still stands.  

When American Common Law Courts are operating in an area, the Supreme Court found, there is no excuse for the operation of martial law courts. 

So all we have to do is either dissolve the incorporation of the existing "state" and "county" courts and run them as unincorporated American Common Law Courts, or, what is more expedient, declare our own political status as one of the "free sovereign and independent people of the United States", hold elections to fill our natural unincorporated public offices including Common Law Judges, Sheriffs, Clerks, Recorders, etc. and notify the rats that American Common Law Courts are operating again and use Milligan Ex Parte to shut the rats down. 

All you have to do is get your ducks in order, declare your proper political status, hold your elections, fill your court offices, and show them the door. 

The Bar Attorneys will either have to tear up their BAR Cards and come to work for the people's court, or restrict themselves to working in their proper capacity in purely administrative and maritime/Admiralty Courts of the Federal Government. 

The Bar has been barred from holding any public office including judge in behalf of the people's government since 1819. 

Now you have received a very useful and valuable history lesson and insight into the situation with the courts, what we are dealing with, how this situation, and what we have to do to put a stop to it. 

Please share this information Far and Wide.
---------------------------------------
See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

7 comments:

  1. makes sense but until the "persons" are "people" and deny their U.S. Citizenship and do a variety of other things that the CORPORATION recognizes, they have big guns and many jails with nimrods that are clueless and at their beckon call. That will not help us immediately in their grasp.

    What can you say that will help "persons" in their immediate grasp?

    ReplyDelete
  2. also to leslie, i believe the regular flag you think is normal without the gold fringe is a military flag and i believe the one gold fringed means at war. (infringing on your rights since you do not have any as a incorporated person) if everyone hasnt noticed we have been at war for quite a while since the war powers act, (lincoln?) hasnt stopped, and under martial rule/government hence we are considered prisoners of war, enemy belligerents and open to summary judgement via courts martial etc etc

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you are incorrect, without the gold fringe is the military flag, with the gold fringe is admiralty law of the sea. Neither represent the Republic, which is the civil flag and one day soon will be flying every where you look!!!!!!!!

      Delete
  3. makes sense but until the "persons" are "people" and deny their U.S. Citizenship and do a variety of other things that the CORPORATION recognizes, they have big guns and many jails with nimrods that are clueless and at their beckon call. That will not help us immediately in their grasp.

    What can you say that will help "persons" in their immediate grasp?

    ReplyDelete
  4. What about the original people of the land? Where and how do they fit in here? It is their land the white people from Europe took. They were killed and herded into reserves. How will we correct this once we claim back our power from the Federal government?

    ReplyDelete
  5. What about the original people of the land? Where and how do they fit in here? It is their land the white people from Europe took. They were killed and herded into reserves. How will we correct this once we claim back our power from the Federal government?

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.