For All The Jural Assemblies - 55 MUNICIPAL COURTS, DEATH and TAXES

By Anna Von Reitz

The Municipal United States Government operates exclusively under Title 50 of the Territorial Federal Code, and has never adopted any other Title of Federal Code; the internal affairs including the financial and political affairs of this creepy war-mongering state-within-a-state perched on our shores and ruled over as a plenary oligarchy by the members of the Territorial Congress, are not open to general public view.  

Last time I looked, you could buy your own copy of the Washington, DC  Municipal Code for about $800.  It includes such nuggets as the statutes they use to claim that we are legally dead and set up offshore corporations in our NAMES,  to sell child labor contracts, to launder money, to create giant slush funds, and for other purposes. 

The Municipal United States Government styles itself as a Roman-style Republic.  This is the source of the Roman Fasces --- a bundle of sticks emblem that you see in the Capitol Rotunda and elsewhere.   Aside from the lies that these monsters have told about us to enrich themselves, they have no jurisdiction related to any living American, yet they contrive to create and enforce the Lion's Share of the false claims in commerce that are brought against our Good Names and Estates. 

These false claims are brought in MUNICIPAL COURTS and it is important for you to realize that everything about MUNICIPAL COURT is the realm of the dead --- literally.  No living men appear in a MUNICIPAL COURT.  Ever.  What appear there are incorporated entities and the officers of incorporated entities, and rarely, a corporate entity which is not incorporated, but nonetheless, also a dead legal fiction entity. 

How can you tell whether you are in a Municipal Court or a Territorial Court?  

The Municipal Courts are the special province of incorporated entities, which are indicated by the use of Dog Latin ---- they use the all capital letters conventions of Latin to write what appears to be English -- and isn't actually, just like the THING bearing what appears to be your NAME isn't you.  

It is all built of deceptions within deceptions, designed to confuse identities and issues, so when you go into one of these COURTS, you must be firmly grounded in exactly who you are, who THEY are, and what your relief and remedy is.    

When you see the NAME of the COURT written in all capital letters, you know it is a MUNICIPAL COURT.   And you know that the only relief to be found in a MUNICIPAL COURT is 50 USC Appendix, Section 7 (c) and (e).  

TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT OF 1917 ACT OCT. 6, 1917, CH. 106, 40 STAT. 411   [Page 19] TITLE 50, APPENDIX—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE

Section 7 (c) -- The sole relief and remedy of any person having any claim to any money or other property heretofore or hereafter conveyed, transferred, ] § 8 assigned, delivered, or paid over to the Alien Property Custodian, [now the US Attorney General]  or required so to be, or seized by him shall be that provided by the terms of this Act [said sections], and in the event of sale or other disposition of such property by the Alien Property Custodian, shall be limited to and enforced against the net proceeds received therefrom and held by the Alien Property Custodian or by the Treasurer of the United States."  

So, when you have to "visit" a Municipal COURT, this, the foregoing, is the "sole relief and remedy" for your Lawful Person.  The Probate of your Estate can never be closed, and all the profit that these monsters seized upon, all the State Trusts they created, all the resources they commandeered, have to be reclaimed and redeemed through the Office of Alien Property Custodian --- which Office was closed and its functions transferred to the US Attorney General. 

Yes, we have more important business to discuss with Mr. Barr than you might suppose.  

When we "visit" one of their Municipal COURTS we do so as Lawful Persons, that is, via our reclaimed and re-conveyed Trade Names, and the only thing we say to them is that we are claiming our sole remedy and relief guaranteed under Title 50 as cited above;  we then proceed to tell them what we want --- our land and homes and perfected titles, our trusts, our gold, our silver, and all our material and immaterial property assets and interests, free and clear of any debt or encumbrance.  

Please also note Section V of the Trading with the Enemy Act, which documents the official end of the Second World War:  

  V. TERMINATION OF STATE OF WAR CESSATION OF HOSTILITIES The cessation of hostilities of World War II was officially proclaimed by the President of the United States, Proclamation No. 2714, Dec. 31, 1946, 12 F.R. 1, 61 Stat. 1048, in the following language: NOW, THEREFORE, I, HARRY S. TRUMAN, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim the cessation of hostilities of World War II, effective twelve o’clock noon, December 31, 1946.  

This is the missing "Sunset Clause" that is applicable to end the "Victory Tax"  by which millions of American State National civilians  were ensnared into paying Federal Income Taxes "voluntarily" to help the "war effort" ---- and then were simply coerced and extorted into paying Federal Income Taxes forever afterward via the false presumption that they were "volunteer" British Merchant Marine Warrant Officers known as "Withholding Agents" and that no specific Sunset Clause ended this arrangement. 

Well, here it is, tucked away in Title 50, for evidence that no actual State of War allowing American State Nationals to pay Federal Income Taxes exists --- very handy for claims against the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service.  

Here is also the 1934 Amendment to the Trading With the Enemy Act which sets aside any statute of limitations to collect property "lost" prior to 1934, which includes the State Trusts, gold, taxes---all from THEIR perspective, "war profits"  that we, American State Nationals, are heir to and owed: 

  "AN ACT To amend section 24 of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 24 (b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended by the Settlement of War Claims Act of 1928, approved March 10, 1928, is amended by adding at the end thereof the following: "Notwithstanding the expiration of any period of limitation provided by law, credit or refund of any income, war-profits, or excess-profits tax erroneously or illegally assessed or collected may be made or allowed if claim therefore was filed with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue by the Alien Property Custodian on or before February 15, 1933." Approved, June 18, 1934  

And here's the annotation for the above: 

  June 18, 1934. [8. 852.] I Public, No. 374.] Trading with the Enemy Act, amended. Vol. 42, p. 1516; Vol. 4.;, p. 277. Credit or refund of any income, or war profits, erroneously assessed and collected, authorized.  

From the foregoing it is pitifully apparent how grotesquely evil and corrupt the politicians --- heads of political lobbies --- have become, and the urgent need for the people of this country to stir their stumps and put an end to this criminality and usurpation under color of law, war-mongering, racketeering, and extortion.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Paul's Fantastic Search Engine, from one of our readers

This message came by email and I forwarded it to Anna who put her Amen of approval for what was written. Rose Marie is referring to the search box at the top of www.annavonreitz.com between the pictures.

---- Original Message -----

From: Anna von Reitz

To: Rose Marie

Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 8:55 PM

Subject: Re: Paul's Fantastic Search Engine

AMEN!!!!!

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:25 PM ROSE MARIE SPANAGEL  wrote:

This is a sensitive topic as some could be learning how to use devices to connect to the internet at the same time they’re learning what went wrong and how to help get our country back on track.

Through the many years I have observed readers don’t use - or know how to use Paul’s Search Engine.  If they did, they would not post nonsense opinions that fail to contribute to material presented - or would be diverting on many non-relevant topics.   One example is comments posted here:  http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/07/its-very-simple-and-exactly-opposite-of.html

Using only the words “Title 50” in the box on Paul’s Search Engine --- that is located on the same page they were reading would have provided more than sufficient information to resolve confusion and provide answers to their questions.    The fewer words in a query will produce more results, as in this example,  11 writings were presented.
http://www.paulstramer.net/search?q=Title+50 
  
Adding the words “Sole Relief and Remedy” to Title 50 – [Only 4 writings were presented link below] http://www.paulstramer.net/search?q=Title+50%2C+Sole+Relief+and+Remedy.

Perhaps it would be beneficial if a permanent reference is included near the area one goes to post comments - in red or other color -  using a similar example above with words: "How to use Search Engine on this page"
INSTRUCTIONS – RESOLVE YOUR QUESTIONS FIRST - BEFORE POSTING COMMENTS?

Paul’s Search Engine is outstanding and he should be lauded for providing it.  It would be grand if more people knew how to use it instead of using “outside search engines” which have been providing dwindling results from censorship.

A One Page Reduction of the Situation

WAKE UP!  WAKE UP! 

I have spent so many days explaining and explaining and trying to drum this into people's conscious awareness so now,  I have reduced it down to simple graphic form and a single page.

by Anna Von Reitz

These private corporate tribunals are only "giving an appearance of justice" ---- which the courts boldly state in their own published rules---- and you can believe them or not, based on your own experience. 

Governmental Services Corporation             Dates of Operation                 Operational Code

United States of America, Inc.                              1868 - 1999                      Federal Code Titles 1-50

(under bankruptcy administration)                       1933 - 1999

UNITED STATES, INC.                                          1944 - 2015                                 Title 50

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                  2009 -                            United Nations Law

USA INC.                                                                1944 -                                Puerto Rican Law

Your political status determines your "law" and your "persona" so long as that corporation exists and you are "enfranchised" by it. . 

Here's Kicker Number 1 Regarding IRS/BATF

By Anna Von Reitz

Yesterday, I told you why all these IRS Liens and Levies are Hokum.

But it gets even better.

Not only are the only powers of distraint related to the IRS overtly lodged with the BATF, but, the IRS is not allowed to access distraint powers lodged in any other Agency acting under any other Title of Federal Code -- including Title 27---that is, the BATF Title.

What this means is that the IRS doesn't have ANY access to ANY powers of distraint through the BATF, either.

I defer to one of my favorite researchers:

"Related to your recent accurate article on the IRS - about enforcement regulations only connected to Title 27 - ATF activities - TRUE - here's the clincher on this fact. See 1 CFR 21.21(c) below - that basically says: The IRS is not allowed to use Title 27 enforcement regulations. The IRS cannot use any "enforcement" regs from any other U.S.C. Title other than Title 26.

All Title 26 (alleged) code section violations -- HAVE TO HAVE A TITLE 26 "ENFORCEMENT" REGULATION in the Parallel Tables of Authority. There are "NO" enforcement regulations (meaning $ collection regulations) for any Title 26 violations.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/1/21.21

Title 26 "Enforcement" regulations are regs "APPROVED" by Congress, but there are "NO" enforcement regs for any Title 26 violations. Why? Because the whole 1040 tax return scheme is 100% "VOLUNTARY" and when someone doesn't file a 1040 tax return and pay income taxes - they are "effectively" un-volunteering to pay, thus, Congress gave NO "AUTHORITY" or "RIGHT" to the IRS to file a lien or levy or seize anyone's bank acct. or garnish their wages, pensions, or social security payments -- so this is why there are no valid "ENFORCEMENT" (tax collection actions) regulations, in the Parallel Table of Authority promulgated (published) in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in the Federal Register where they have to be published by law - or they are not valid positive law regulations applicable to the living men and women in the states of the union.

Every bank account seizure, wage garnishment or pension seizure by the IRS is an illegal "taking" - a theft of one's private property in violation of too many laws to mention here and I'm sure the IRS knows they have no "AUTHORITY" from Congress to seize anyone's bank accounts or other assets as they have never had any authority from Congress to even send anyone an "Amount Due" notice. This applies even to "taxpayers" who haven't revoked their election to be treated "as though" they are "taxpayers."

See attached one page "Enforcement" Regulations" - not one regulation relates to Title 26 like they have to be - and "ALL" tax code "violations" are Title 26 violations (allegedly). BINGO!!!!

Any IRS officer, agent, or employee will be terminated (fired) if found to be using illegal and un-authorized tax collection actions against anyone. Every tax collection letter, notice, or action by the IRS is "unauthorized" by Congress. Stand up people.

1 CFR § 21.21 - General requirements: References.

§ 21.21 General requirements: References.

(a) Each reference to the Code of Federal Regulations shall be in terms of the specific titles, chapters, parts, sections, and paragraphs involved. Ambiguous references such as “herein”, “above”, “below”, and similar expressions may not be used.

(b) Each document that contains a reference to material published in the Code shall include the Code citation as a part of the reference.

(c) Each agency shall publish its own regulations in full text. Cross-references to the regulations of another agency may not be used as a substitute for publication in full text, unless the Office of the Federal Register finds that the regulation meets any of the following exceptions:

(1) The reference is required by court order, statute, Executive order or reorganization plan.

(2) The reference is to regulations promulgated by an agency with the exclusive legal authority to regulate in a subject matter area, but the referencing agency needs to apply those regulations in its own programs.

(3) The reference is informational or improves clarity rather than being regulatory.

(4) The reference is to test methods or consensus standards produced by a Federal agency that have replaced or preempted private or voluntary test methods or consensus standards in a subject matter area.

(5) The reference is to the Department level from a subagency.

[37 FR 23611, Nov. 4, 1972, as amended at 50 FR 12468, Mar. 28, 1985]

1 CFR § 21.40 - General requirements: Authority citations.

§ 21.40 General requirements: Authority citations.

Each section in a document subject to codification must include, or be covered by, a complete citation of the authority under which the section is issued, including -

(a) General or specific authority delegated by statute; and

(b) Executive delegations, if any, necessary to link the statutory authority to the issuing agency.

[50 FR 12468, Mar. 28, 1985]"

_______________

Just wait, Folks. It gets better. And better. And better.

The Territorial United States Congress gave no power to the IRS to inflict any distraint upon anyone by any means at all. Title 26 is a Red Herring. It's all nothing but Smoke and Mirrors.

And you will be pleased to know that the IRS Auditors are all functioning as Officers in the Military and using DD150 "Commissions" --- without, however, any authority to audit 1040 Forms.

What you are looking at is the Biggest Con and Identity Theft and Money Laundering Scheme in the history of the world. You and your country and everyone that you are likely to know, have been the victims of criminal cartels operating as central banks ever since the Council of Nicea and the formation of the "Roman" Catholic Church.

For 1700 years they have been getting away with this crap and using the Christian Church as a storefront to pull it off. They were going to move their operations to the United Nations as their new storefront, and shed their moral obligations entirely, but now that won't be possible.

Hang onto your hats, because the Apocalypse is well underway, and The Great Tribulation (paying of "tribute" to Rome) is ending.

http://annavonreitz.com/rra98sec1203.pdf

http://annavonreitz.com/subtitlefregulations.pdf

----------------------------

See this article and over 2200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

Title 50, Sole Relief and Remedy...

Researched by Anna Von Reitz.

 Title 50 has been reworked and recodified many times and every time it is, the "cheese" is moved again, so I understand much of the frustration.  

I am attaching a complete reference to Title 50 [2012] and the "sole relief and remedy" provided by Section 7 (c) and (e). Please post it where people can see with their own eyes?

http://uscode.house.gov/download/annualhistoricalarchives/pdf/2012/2012usc50a.pdf

§ 7 TITLE 50, APPENDIX—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE Page 18 ……of, or for the benefit of an enemy or ally of enemy have any right or remedy against the debtor, obligor, or other person liable to pay, fulfill, or perform the same unless said assignment, indorsement, or delivery was made prior to the beginning of the war or shall be made under license as herein provided, or unless, if made after the beginning of the war and prior to the date of passage of this Act [Oct. 6, 1917], the person to whom the same was made shall prove lack of knowledge and of reasonable cause to believe on his part that the same was made by, from or on behalf of, or on account of, or for the benefit of an enemy or ally of enemy; and any person who knowingly pays, discharges, or satisfies any such debt, note, bill, or other obligation or chose in action shall, on conviction thereof, be deemed to violate section three hereof [section 3 of this Appendix]: Provided, That nothing in this Act [said sections] contained shall prevent the carrying out, completion, or performance of any contract, agreement, or obligation originally made with or entered into by an enemy or ally of enemy where, prior to the beginning of the war and not in contemplation thereof, the interest of such enemy or ally of enemy devolved by assignment or otherwise upon a person not an enemy or ally of enemy, and no enemy or ally of enemy will be benefited by such carrying out, completion, or performance otherwise than by release from obligation thereunder. Nothing in this Act [said sections] shall be deemed to prevent payment of money belonging or owing to an enemy or ally of enemy to a person within the United States not an enemy or ally of enemy, for the benefit of such person or of any other person within the United States, not an enemy or ally of enemy, if the funds so paid shall have been received prior to the beginning of the war and such payments arise out of transactions entered into prior to the beginning of the war, and not in contemplation thereof: Provided, That such payment shall not be made without the license of the President, general or special, as provided in this Act [said sections]. Nothing in this Act [said sections] shall be deemed to authorize the prosecution of any suit or action at law or in equity in any court within the United States by an enemy or ally of enemy prior to the end of the war, except as provided in section ten hereof [section 10 of this Appendix]: Provided, however, That an enemy or ally of enemy licensed to do business under this Act [said sections] may prosecute and maintain any such suit or action so far as the same arises solely out of the business transacted within the United States under such license and so long as such license remains in full force and effect: And provided further, That an enemy or ally of enemy may defend by counsel any suit in equity or action at law which may be brought against him. Receipt of notice from the President to the effect that he has reasonable ground to believe that any person is an enemy or ally of enemy shall be prima facie defense to any one receiving the same, in any suit or action at law or in equity brought or maintained, or to any right or set-off or recoupment asserted by, such person and based on failure to complete or perform since the beginning of the war any contract or other obligation. In any prosecution under section sixteen hereof [section 16 of this Appendix] proof of receipt of notice from the President to the effect that he has reasonable cause to believe that any person is an enemy or ally of enemy shall be prima facie evidence that the person receiving such notice has reasonable cause to believe such other person to be an enemy or ally of enemy within the meaning of section three hereof [section 3 of this Appendix]. (c) If the President shall so require any money or other property including (but not thereby limiting the generality of the above) patents, copyrights, applications therefor, and rights to apply for the same, trade marks, choses in action, and rights and claims of every character and description owing or belonging to or held for, by, on account of, or on behalf of, or for the benefit of, an enemy or ally of enemy not holding a license granted by the President hereunder, which the President after investigation shall determine is so owning or so belongs or is so held, shall be conveyed, transferred, assigned, delivered, or paid over to the Alien Property Custodian, or the same may be seized by the Alien Property Custodian; and all property thus acquired shall be held, administered and disposed of as elsewhere provided in this Act [sections 1 to 6, 7 to 39, and 41 to 44 of this Appendix]. Any requirement made pursuant to this Act [said sections], or a duly certified copy thereof, may be filed, registered, or recorded in any office for the filing, registering, or recording of conveyances, transfers, or assignments of any such property or rights as may be covered by such requirement (including the proper office for filing, registering, or recording conveyances, transfers, or assignments of patents, copyrights, trade-marks, or any rights therein or any other rights); and if so filed, registered, or recorded shall impart the same notice and have the same force and effect as a duly executed conveyance, transfer, or assignment to the Alien Property Custodian so filed, registered, or recorded. Whenever any such property shall consist of shares of stock or other beneficial interest in any corporation, association, or company or trust, it shall be the duty of the corporation, association, or company or trustee or trustees issuing such shares or any certificates or other instruments representing the same or any other beneficial interest to cancel upon its, his, or their books all shares of stock or other beneficial interest standing upon its, his, or their books in the name of any person or persons, or held for, on account of, or on behalf of, or for the benefit of any person or persons who shall have been determined by the President, after investigation, to be an enemy or ally of enemy, and which shall have been required to be conveyed, transferred, assigned, or delivered to the Alien Property Custodian or seized by him, and in lieu thereof to issue certificates or other instruments for such shares or other beneficial interest to the Alien Property Custodian or otherwise, as the Alien Property Custodian shall require. The sole relief and remedy of any person having any claim to any money or other property heretofore or hereafter conveyed, transferred, Page 19 TITLE 50, APPENDIX—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE § 8 assigned, delivered, or paid over to the Alien Property Custodian, or required so to be, or seized by him shall be that provided by the terms of this Act [said sections], and in the event of sale or other disposition of such property by the Alien Property Custodian, shall be limited to and enforced against the net proceeds received therefrom and held by the Alien Property Custodian or by the Treasurer of the United States. (d) If not required to pay, convey, transfer, assign, or deliver under the provisions of subsection (c) of this section, any person not an enemy or ally of enemy who owes to, or holds for, or on account of, or on behalf of, or for the benefit of an enemy or of an ally of enemy not holding a license granted by the President hereunder, any money or other property, or to whom any obligation or form of liability to such enemy or ally of enemy is presented for payment, may, at his option, with the consent of the President, pay, convey, transfer, assign, or deliver to the alien property custodian said money or other property under such rules and regulations as the President shall prescribe. (e) No person shall be held liable in any court for or in respect to anything done or omitted in pursuance of any order, rule, or regulation made by the President under the authority of this Act [sections 1 to 6, 7 to 39, and 41 to 44 of this Appendix]. Any payment, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or delivery of money or property made to the alien property custodian hereunder shall be a full acquittance and discharge for all purposes of the obligation of the person making the same to the extent of same. The alien property custodian and such other persons as the President may appoint shall have power to execute, acknowledge, and deliver any such instrument or instruments as may be necessary or proper to evidence upon the record or otherwise such acquittance and discharge, and shall, in case of payment to the alien property custodian of any debt or obligation owed to an enemy or ally of enemy, deliver up any notes, bonds, or other evidences of indebtedness or obligation, or any security therefor in which such enemy or ally of enemy had any right or interest that may have come into the possession of the alien property custodian, with like effect as if he or they, respectively, were duly appointed by the enemy or ally of enemy, creditor, or obligee. The President shall issue to every person so appointed a certificate of the appointment and authority of such person, and such certificate shall be received in evidence in all courts within the United States. Whenever any such certificate of authority shall be offered to any registrar, clerk, or other recording officer, Federal or otherwise, within the United States, such officer shall record the same in like manner as a power of attorney, and such record or a duly certified copy thereof shall be received in evidence in all courts of the United States or other courts within the United States. (Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, §7, 40 Stat. 416; Nov. 4, 1918, ch. 201, §1, 40 Stat. 1020.) AMENDMENTS 1918—Subsec. (c). Act Nov. 4, 1918, amended subsec. (c) generally, inserting provisions on recording of property transfers, cancellation of enemy owned stock by corporations, and restriction of claims to relief provided

A Public Official, or, Merely Pretending to Be?

 By Anna Von Reitz

One of the problems I have with believing any of the reports of people being arrested and tried at Gitmo and elsewhere is that certain fundamental premises don't make sense.  

Here is a case in point, following fast upon the heels of our analysis of King John I's private ability to contract versus public ability to contract. 

https://realrawnews.com/2024/01/military-arrests-biden-regimes-chief-science-advisor/

According to the Narrative, United States Navy personnel, particularly the JAG (Judge Advocate General) Command, have been rounding up various members of the former and present political Administrations and subjecting them to various charges and sentences, up to and including capital punishment for treason.  

The stated rationale for this is that these people are "public officials" but a closer inspection reveals that this is not true; they may have occupied vacant Public Offices, but that does not make them legitimate Public Officials -- especially not without their contractual acceptances. 

As impersonators, does the charge of "treason" even apply?  

People engaged in parody and theater productions and even con games seldom rise to the level of capital crimes, and though I appreciate the spirit of the thing, it does rather reek of killing the scapegoats that have been hired to promote the fictional narrative -- many of whom may actually believe that they are public officials and have no idea otherwise. 

The distinction between being elected in a political election sponsored by a municipal or commercial corporation and being elected in an actual Public Election may be lost on Joe Average or Joe Biden, for that matter, but not on us, the actual Americans who are Foreign Sovereigns, not Sovereign Citizens.  

LOL.

It's been over 160 years since we had actual Public Elections in this country, 160 years since we sent delegations of Fiduciary Deputies from all the States to our capitol in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  

It's also been that long since our American Federal Subcontractors sent delegations of properly informed Representatives to the Federal Capitol in Washington, DC. 

How are these poor vermin supposed to know that they lack any authority?  That they are just pawns in a play? That they are occupying foreign corporate offices and foisting them off as Public Offices? 

True, they have evinced neither good sense nor conscience in their roles.  True, they have created  gross public endangerment in the name of their profit seeking.  True, they have betrayed the best interests of this country and our people.  True, they are scum overall and their performances stink.... but.... are they "Public Officials" or merely imposters playing the role of Public Officials? 

Does this play-acting amount to Treason? Where do they incur the liability of Public Office, as they are occupying similarly-named private corporate offices instead? 

And as imposters or skilled actors, either one, do they have the liability commensurate with capital punishment?  

If JAG is actually arresting and imprisoning and executing all these politicians and bureaucrats, as a Justice, I have to ask --- on what grounds are these phonies being tried?  

They aren't "Public Officials" according to any definition of the words I am familiar with. 

They don't have a Public Bond or a Public Oath. 

And what "Enemy" are they aiding and abetting or colluding with for profit? 

Sure, corporations have "enemies" in the sense of rival corporations, selling different services and products, etc., but is it proper to style such commercial and political rivals as "Enemies" in the sense invoked throughout the War Powers Act, Title 50, of the Federal Code? 

It's more like gunning down a house cat and pretending it's a tiger. 

Slaughtering numerous nobodies and leaving the actual criminals intact doesn't serve anyone's best interests. And doesn't fulfill the duty owed to our government.  

Without an actual and properly declared war in evidence, it's difficult to see how anyone invokes Title 50 with a straight face.  

"Wars" against poverty, drugs, and general clueless ignorance are equally absurd, and "treason" based on such "wars" is even more ridiculous. 

Come to that, upon what basis in Law or Fact does Title 50 and its claim of "War Powers" rest?  No such war powers were ever granted to our Federal Subcontractors by the people of our States, so we naturally wonder upon what basis these undelegated "powers" can be presumed to exist? 

Should I stand up and start stamping my feet and claim that a mouse scampering across the toe of my shoe is an "emergency"?  And then, should I claim that I have "war powers" against this rodent, when it's not my rodent, not my house, and not even my shoe (it turns out it was borrowed)?  

And then, should I start screaming "Treason!" at the property manager I hired to maintain this vacant property? 

A rodent it may be.  Scum it may be.  A vaudeville comedian escaped from the silver screen maybe, or even an Agent of Darkness, but wherein do any of these characters owe the liability of treason?  

I suppose an actor, like John Wilkes Booth, could be charged with Treason if he killed an actual American President; but, what if he killed a man pretending to be our President, a man who was actually committing treason against our country and who was actually working for a foreign power -- in this case, British Territorial interests?  

Then, it is a Twisted Tale, and murder it may be, but not treason.  

History and logic provides that Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Attorney prohibited from holding our Presidential Office, usurped upon it and seemed to occupy our Public Office without actually doing so. 

Was he committing Treason? 

In what sense could our own British Territorial United States Government contractor be considered a foreign Enemy as contemplated under the War Powers Act? And if so, with whom were they colluding, as in aiding and abetting? 

Let's go back to Benedict Arnold.  He was a General in the Continental Army.  He betrayed his commission and oath.  He held the office and rank and wore the uniform. He betrayed his command and his commander in favor of England, a declared and recognized Enemy that he conspired with in exchange for payola. 

That is treason.  

But what in the murky swamp of the current day compares with that?  We have municipal and commercial corporations and their shareholder elections resulting in their corporation "Presidents" substituting themselves for our actual Public Elections and Public Officials --- so how can corporations pretend that their fisticuffs rise to the level of --or even address-- the issue of treason? 

If there is any treason to be had, it appears that it lies in the pretense that these private corporate elections are Public Elections and that these corporations are our government and that these elected corporation officers are "Public Officials". 

If so, which "public" do they serve?  And to whom and to which "public" do the JAG Officers owe their allegiance and service?  

Ours or theirs?  

They appear to be working on the HMS AMERICA and aiding and abetting incorporated entities that are bent on usurping against our actual government, while whacking and hanging all these petty civil servants who are working for other run amok corporations and accusing them of "treason".  

Treason implies betrayal of a lawful government, in this case, our lawful government, which presumes the existence of Public Officials capable of committing treason. 

Not that I am defending or weeping over the end of such "luminaries" as those reported among the dead at Gitmo, it's more a matter of plain old jurisprudence rearing its head. 

Treason requires: (1) Public Election of Public Officials or appointment of Commissioned Officers by duly elected Public Officials; (2) liability for the elected Public Offices and Commissions held under oath, bond, and/or public affirmation; (3) betrayal of that elected Public Office or Commission especially in collusion with Foreign Governments for monetary reward or emoluments. 

Henry Kissinger, George H.W. Bush, Colin Powell, and Norman Schwarzkopf being knighted by the late Queen--- knighthood from a foreign government is an emolument and payment from that foreign government for their service is monetary reward.

That is treason -- if these men ever occupied an American Government Office at all, but the facts indicate that they didn't; they only pretended to.

There are no Public Offices left in America, except in our State Assemblies and in a few stubborn Counties scattered across the landscape, holding on from days of yore, preventing any claim of exclusive legislative jurisdiction.  

God bless them forever.  They've held on, without even knowing why it was important. 

When we examine the Law and the Facts, there are no bonded Public Offices left and no Public Oaths of Office, either, related to our lawful government.   

All these jokers, first to last, working for either one or both of the Municipal Corporations located in the District of Columbia, or the various franchises thereof, are operating as Free Agents and the only sort of election they have endured is a private shareholder election sponsored by private political parties. 

And that's the logical limit of their liability, too. 

So I hate to throw cold water on those who are hot to trot and convict all these vermin of treason, but it is not possible to convict people of treason when they hold no liability for the crime. 

Unlawful conversion is the crime that they are guilty of, and that is a capital crime similar to cattle rustling; however, both the British Territorial United States and the Municipal United States Government are guilty of unlawful conversion against their loyal Employers, the clueless Americans. 

And both need forgiveness-- amnesty-- to survive this. 

Otherwise, we will be stuck with the nasty duty of arresting millions of people for pulling a giant Confidence Racket -- a Sting that most of them are unaware of-- and which in itself is not a capital crime and not treason. 

We will also be stuck prosecuting -- to the death -- a few thousand wiseguy masterminds, mainly old CIA and DIA spooks, like [Opium] Poppy Bush, crooked Generals, and worse Admirals, who thought they were really cute for sucking up to the Order of the Garter. 

These people aren't worth the effort and the blood and the karma; they aren't worth spitting on. 

It's far more important to nail their organizations to the barn door and foreclose their assets.  

Defund them and cut their access to all their money laundering bank partners and subsidiary corporation partners, like the United States Government, Inc. umbrella and all its brand-holder franchises--- the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Bureau of Land Management, et alia, for starters.

Come on, America. Come on home, Mamas.  You got some real house cleaning to do. 

And it all comes down to you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwgg1Pu6cNg&list=RDMM&index=22

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Mechanics Fraud

 By Anna Von Reitz

Information provided to H.E. Cardinal Mamberti and the Vatican Chancery Court regarding our Claim March 6 2005, January 19 2023 in seq: 

In this matter, the situation being described is specific to The United States and may not be systematically applied in the same way in all the various venues and countries that are similarly impacted by the euphemistically described "privatization" of government functions and the promotion of Corporate Feudalism as a replacement for Colonialism. 

That said, we have no reason to suspect that the same or similar means are not being applied in other countries; we simply haven't investigated this part of the overall fraud on an international basis. 

So then, in The United States, we have been able to determine that the Municipal Corporations providing the Federal Government functions have very little granted enforcement power within the States of the Union, and this remains true despite their substitution of their own franchise operations as "State of State" businesses.  

Federal regulatory powers are limited to the interstate manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol, tobacco and firearms  and to the interstate commerce clause found in each of the Federal Constitutions. 

We will note that the "firearms" being referenced are not rifles, shotguns or pistols --- the firearms under Federal regulatory authority are larger than 50 mm artillery, mortars, and similar weapons more often thought of today as military grade weapons. 

We shall also find that "interstate" requires crossing physical borders and that "commerce" means business conducted between two incorporated entities, and that the intent of the interstate commerce clause itself is to prevent obstruction of commerce between the States and is not intended to provide restrictions on commerce. 

That leaves the Federal Government very little in terms of applicable enforcement power in the States of the Union, but over the years various and nefarious means have been employed to evade these lawful limitations. 

We have already described the process by which Americans are mischaracterized as British Territorial Persons, and how those Persons are "lost at sea", declared "legally dead" --  and how their estates are then processed into Municipal Corporation franchises operated under the victim's names, expressed in all capital letters. 

A somewhat similar process of misrepresentation and mischaracterization via impersonation is employed to provide illicit enforcement powers.  

Let us also note that as part of the unlawful conversion process, American Common Law has been replaced sequentially with Military/Admiralty Law (addressing the British Territorial U.S. Citizens) and then with Municipal Maritime-- that is, Commercial Law, addressing the Municipal citizens of the United States. 

Also before we begin to discuss the mechanics, let's observe that there are two kinds of foreign citizenry employed by the two Municipal Corporations operating from their home base in the District of Columbia --- British Territorial U.S. Citizens, and Municipal citizens of the United States, and please note that the Municipal citizens of the United States may be alive (Postal Clerks, for example) or dead -- as in the case of Municipal Corporation franchises, corporations, estates, and even public transmitting utilities named after living people.  

The existence of these different kinds of citizenry operating in different capacities requires two different avenues for prosecution and two different forms of law. 

In our direct observation for over twenty years, when a Municipal citizen of the United States is named as a defendant in either a civil or criminal case, the name of the defendant appears in all capital letters, like this:  ROBERT ALBERT MURRAY, and they are tried under commercial law. 

When a British Territorial U.S. Citizen is addressed as a defendant in a civil or criminal case, their name appears in Upper and Lower Case like this: "John Thomas Anderson", and they are tried under military law. 

The Municipal citizens of the United States continue to be prosecuted generally under the presumptions provided by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Corporate Constitution foisted on us by the Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business as "The United States of America" ---Incorporated, in 1868. 

These Municipal DEFENDANTS are deemed to be guilty until proven innocent and thus are pre-judged to be criminals awaiting sentencing at the discretion of the judge.  The indictments against THEM may derive from any Federal Code or Title, but the enforcement always comes under Title 27 of the British Territorial Federal Code, which additionally declares in 27 CFR 72.11, that all crimes are commercial crimes. 

Title 27 gives armed enforcement power to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, in pursuit of its regulatory power over the interstate manufacture, transportation or sale of alcohol, tobacco, and firearms. 

All Municipal DEFENDANTS may be indicted under any Title, but the enforcement is always under Title 27.  

Thus, famously, DONALD J. TRUMP is indicted under Title 18, but the enforcement for this action comes under Title 27--- specifically under 27 CFR 72.11, because this is a criminal indictment. 

Enforcement will be under the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.

Similarly, British Territorial U.S. Citizen Defendants may be indicted under any Title, but the enforcement comes under Title 50.  If the Defendant named was "Donald J. Trump" we would be looking at enforcement under the Trading With the Enemy Act (civil indictments) or under the Military Code of Justice -- Admiralty Law (criminal indictments).  

So indictments may come from any Title, but enforcement in the States is extremely limited and available under only two Titles of Federal Code.

It may have occurred to someone to ask --- how are all these crimes and civil issues attached to and enforced under just two extremely limited federal regulatory powers?  

They lie.  

The Internal Revenue Service/IRS keeps a coded Masterfile dossier on every American from birth to death.  They develop a constant and false narrative about each and every American, which involves that American in some activity that is regulated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.  

Thus, a man who is actually a professional car mechanic living in Michigan may be mischaracterized as an international arms dealer selling guns in Malaysia.  

A housewife who has lived all her life in a small town in Minnesota may be mischaracterized as a manager of a wine export business in Tangiers. 

The Internal Revenue Service/IRS creates these false dossiers for two reasons --- (1) so that they can borrow the armed enforcement powers of their sister agency, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, and (2) so that they can use these foreign offshore identities for money laundering receipts from so-called Black Ops --- arms sales, drug production, human trafficking, etc., -- and Municipal Corporation tax evasion purposes.  

When the Internal Revenue Service (Territorial) or IRS (Municipal) wants to "bust" someone for tax evasion, they take their False Narrative dossiers to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the BATF takes over enforcement, marshals the equipment, provides pocket commissions and deputizes the IRS employees --- and shares their armed enforcement powers with the IRS based on the IRS's own false narrative connecting the targeted  "taxpayer" to activities regulated by BATF. 

It's simple, effective, in-house and everyone's back is covered, except, of course, for the hapless victim of all this institutionalized  fraud and deceit, who stands in the docket entirely confused and unable to defend themselves from the onslaught of venom they receive.  

How could they defend themselves, when they have no clue that they are being accused of selling arms in Venezuela and not paying the Federal Income Taxes on their earnings from that regulated activity? 

Molly from Minnesota is going to stand there like a deer in the headlights and the Judge is going to read the dossier from the IRS just like the BATF reads it, and he is going to conclude that Molly is guilty as charged, and he is going to confiscate her home and send her to federal prison for tax evasion -- even though Molly hasn't stepped foot in Tangiers and doesn't have any Federal income to tax. 

Totally innocent people are suffering these outrages every single day in this country and it is all the fault of the privately owned for-profit Municipal Corporations and their personnel operating these criminal fraud schemes based on impersonation of the victims as foreign PERSONS, false dossiers provided by the Internal Revenue Service/IRS, improper enforcement provided by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms/BATF, and corrupt court officers.

The same basic scheme is practiced against the purported British Territorial Warrant Officers in the British Merchant Marine Service acting as Taxpayers for the King and being charged under TItle 50.  This is more rare and more serious as it is tried under more draconian law allowing enforcement under military auspices, so that enforcement is more violent and severe.  If possible, this second option-- which is what comes after the first option, the Municipal COURT, has failed --- is even more phony.

In this secondary scenario, the American victim is mischaracterized as a non-commissioned Warrant Officer in the British Territorial Merchant Marine Service accused of failing to report taxes collected for the the King in civil cases, or, alternatively, as a foreign officer at war with the British Territorial Government and engaged in piracy or privateering against the British Monarch in criminal cases.  These cases are tried before a court sitting as a military tribunal and the punishments meted out for even minor infractions are very severe.  

These prosecutions more commonly involve men who are business owners or ranch owners who have successfully rebuffed the attempts of the Municipal IRS to entrap them, and who are unprepared to further rebut the second wave of false charges and impersonations misaddressed to them. 

This basic fraud at the heart of the administration and finances of the Municipal Corporations and their operations in this country has resulted in the proliferation of criminality throughout the government services sector of the economy and at every level of administration. 

There are now an estimated 25 million government employees working for the Municipal Corporations housed in the District of Columbia and their franchise operations at the State-of-State and County levels and over 50,000 such purported "government" agencies and franchises overall (there should be less than 5,000 such entities) --- and they are all engaged in some form of racketeering, extortion, or other form of financial or behavioral coercion against the General Public and against the Public Interest. 

The first Big Lies told against American babies in their cradle are followed up with more Big Lies compiled by the Internal Revenue Service/IRS as phony dossiers, and soon, we have fake dossiers being used to discredit Presidential candidates, too.  We have Michael Hayden, former CIA Director, bragging about how everything is a lie and how lying is an essential skill and part of government function, etc., and this is trickling down to training programs teaching recruits "How to Lie" provided in State Trooper Academies nationwide. 

We wish for all this fraudulent nonsense to stop and be unwound with alacrity and determination by those responsible for it. 

We wish for the collapse and liquidation of  approximately 40,000 unnecessary and contractually non-consensual corporate "government entities" and the forfeiture of at least 6200-plus County "government" franchises, 100 State-of-State franchises, and approximately 100 Territorial and Municipal Corporations that are essential for our military defense.  

We wish for government and government services at all levels to be drastically and permanently reduced and pared down to provide those "essential government services" we contractually agreed to receive, in the way we agreed to receive them, and very little else.  

We wish for the bulk of government employees to be sent home and for them to be re-employed in actual productive jobs. 

We wish for the members of the Territorial and Municipal Congresses to observe the limitations of their positions and spending authorities, and otherwise seek to maintain stability in the midst of change and prepare to stand down from extra assumed duties once the Public Office elections are held for the Continental Congress and the American Federal Republic Congress.

We wish for honesty, simplicity, and accountability from any government that serves us.  

This part of our presentation discusses the mechanics of one central source of criminality and institutionalized fraud embedded within the administration of the Municipal Corporations that are supposed to be here providing "essential government services".  This discussion does not suggest that this is the only source of corruption. 

Stopping these improper activities and overreaching of enforcement authorities and overall closing down the mindless proliferation of "government" franchises, agencies, and NGO contractors, will be a giant step toward compliance with our treaties and service contracts, reducing government expenditures, and re-introducing truth as a concept that all government services subcontractors need to honor. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                  In care of: Box 520994

                  Big Lake, Alaska 99652

Issued June 13th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.