Could Democrats Decertify a Trump Victory in 2024?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/could-democrats-decertify-a-trump-victory-in-2024-post-5594722
Border Deception: How the US and UN Are Quietly Running the Border Crisis
Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 10,360 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. WHAT THEY WRITE IS THEIR OWN OPINION, just as what I write is my own.
Tuesday, February 27, 2024
Monday, February 26, 2024
Political Realism
By Anna Von Reitz
Of all the pernicious ideas and assumptions that Americans have unquestioningly imbibed, two bits of programming stand out above all the others.
The first indoctrinated idea-assumption that has to be weeded out like dandelions is the idea that our government is a democracy and that we run by majority rule.
No, thank you, that's the Other Guys.
If Mob Rule is what you want, toddle on down the street to the nearest District Assembly. They are the ones that rely on majority opinion. Not us.
Our Forefathers looked at democracy, its form, and its history, and they chose a republican form of government instead. What does that mean?
It means that we choose to protect the individual's rights and assets even against the group-think of the masses. It means that we don't care what 51% or 97% of the group-think is.
Instead, there is one supreme consideration -- preserving the sanctity of each one of us and protecting each one's property. And why is that?
Because we know that if we maintain that one standard, the rights and property of everyone in the group will be preserved.
Put bluntly, if we never allowed slavery to exist, there would be no danger of anyone being enslaved.
If we don't allow the existence of a Caste System, there's no danger of anyone being denigrated.
If we don't care what the majority of British Territorial U.S. Citizens think, we will never be suborned by another Officer of the King.
If we don't allow Political Lobbying Groups to choose our candidates for our public offices, we will never suffer fools in office.
There is a lot more I could say in the same vein.
For now, I just want you to chew on the basic concept of "right" versus "wrong", and what tolerating wrong brings upon everyone concerned, no matter how popular being wrong is.
The Southern Plantation owners probably thought that slavery was the greatest institution ever -- until they found themselves on the other end of the knotted rope.
It's the same thing with "democracy". It's wonderful as long as you are in the majority. Otherwise, not so much.
We've grown up in a country in the thrall of its own public employees, hearing almost daily about "our democracy" and "preserving our democracy" and "danger to our democracy" and for the most part, we just accepted this without another thought.
It wasn't until we grew up and studied our own American history that we realized that it isn't "our" democracy they are talking about. It's their democracy. A foreign British Territorial Government espoused by our British Territorial Public Employees.
The second truly pesky indoctrination stems from the first; not only are we not a democracy based on majority rule, we don't use political lobbies to pre-screen candidates for our public elections.
There is no "Democrat" or "Republican" or "Two Party System" in the actual American Government.
We have our natural predilections and people do take sides on various issues, but we don't institutionalize this divisive self-centered behavior and give it billions of dollars to push and shove our government and determine our political leadership.
The American Government takes each candidate one by one, evaluates their thinking, their track record, their demonstrated skills. And then we make a choice free of labels, unimpeded by how much money the candidate raised.
Again, put bluntly, there are no Debbie Wasserman-Schultz's in America. That's the U.S. with all the ticker-tape fanfare and billions of dollars spent on every political campaign as they try to get a majority of voters to support Joe instead of Donald and vice versa.
If we accept the fact that our mission as a government is to protect the individual and their property and align ourselves with that ever uppermost in mind, we won't get sidetracked into "democracy", a form of government that subordinates the individual to the will of a group.
We won't be caught micro-managing the lives of others. We won't be unthinking minions of blind authority. We won't be victims of such a system ourselves.
And we won't care if their democracy goes down in flames, because we rejected democracy as a desirable form of government a long time ago.
What we want are honest men and women who are not involved in politics. We want people who care about the country and who share actual American values -- which does not include majority rule, BTW.
We hold ourselves to a higher standard and we hold our officials to a higher standard.
We actually have to decide what is right and good, and how best to defend the rights and property of individuals, for ourselves.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
More Confirmation
By Anna Von Reitz
Yes, we haven't been the only ones that told the truth and pointed the observant fingers in the right direction.
See here: Why Did Russia REALLY Invade Ukraine?
Of course, so far as Britain is concerned, it took no rocket scientists or people with IQs over 250 to guess, correctly, that Britain was at the bottom of the dogpile.
It is such a monotonous conclusion that predicting sun and windstorms in the Sahara Desert would be more challenging and less statistically correct.
Still, it is comforting when in addition to seeing and correctly reading the writing on the wall, someone else sees it and reads it out, too.
Here we are. Proxy war in Ukraine. Britain and its Mercs at the bottom of it. Oh, and NATO, their faithful cohorts in crime. All determined, as the writer above noted, to fight to the last Ukrainian.
Why not? It doesn't cost them anything but more pieces of paper, and they have a printing press, so no lack of supplies.
When they can't sell the world FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES because they have counterfeited them into oblivion, they will try to sell UNITED STATES NOTES, instead.
And just keep on punting.
As long as anyone here will allow it.
All those who oppose genocide and war, all those who have a better vision for humanity, all those who care -- gather here.
Gather to the lawful governments of the countries and nations. Get ready to kick lawless corporations where it hurts.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: Commentary on Furled and Blackened Union Jack
By Anna Von Reitz
Many people have contacted me about this "historic" small video showing three members of the British Honor Guard riding in public with the Union Jack flag furled and "blackened", meaning in a black sheath: https://twitter.com/KillAuDeepState/status/1761703871939056096
Everyone wants to know what it means, but if you have been following along, it's just more proof of what I have already told you.
"King Charles III" is not functioning as a King of anything -- not England, not Great Britain. He was crowned and is functioning solely as an Emperor in the air jurisdiction.
Thus, two horses are black (England and Great Britain) and one horse is white (the UK).
This is just more confirmation that these yahoos are trying to excuse their actions by all converting to Satanism (hoping to escape justice by pleading religious freedom and the fact that Satanism is not under Ecclesiastical Law).
The Ecclesiastical Law demands that any corporation that acts "unlawfully" must be liquidated. The Pope is obligated as a Christian to honor the Ecclesiastical Law and liquidate all these corporations that have participated in genocide, robbed, plundered, pillaged, maimed, defrauded, human trafficked, kidnapped, murdered, etc.
The only way he gets out of that obligation is by converting to Satanism or some other religion that stands outside the Ecclesiastical Law -- and Satanism makes sense, because that would serve to justify all their criminality and destructive actions.
Bergoglio and "King" Emperor Charles III and obviously, some other British Crown scum, are apparently seeking a means to maintain their freedom and excuse their actions on a legal technicality that would allow them to maintain a position in the jurisdiction of the air by claiming that, well, after all, they were Satanists doing what Satanists do: lying, cheating, murdering, stealing; and--- (this is the real point of their schtick) as Satanists operate outside the Ecclesiastical Law, they are not under any obligation to liquidate the offending corporations.
We brought all this to a head by holding Francis accountable under Ecclesiastical Law. Now he and his minion, Charles, are trying to dodge their obligations and find a way of saving their necks.
We take a very dim view of this artifice and don't allow it; they want to play by the rules of Ancient Rome?
Fine.
Fictio cedit veritati; fiction juris non est, ubi veritas.
Fiction yields to truth. Where the truth is, fiction of law does not exist.
We are where truth is.
The further truth is that under Roman Civil Law, the Maxim is: Let him who will be deceived, be deceived.
We are not deceived. We are calling them out for it.
The additional Maxim of Roman Law is: Possession by pirates does not change ownership.
We declare that these corporations are all dissolved before us, that we are not deceived, and that we are in possession of All That Is.
No delegated power is superior to that power which we hold in our hearts and in our hands.
Right is right and wrong is wrong; what the Unrighteous have stored up for themselves is given to the Righteous instead.
Within Law and Without Law, the end result is the same.
They are equally condemned as Christians and as Satanists.
If they don't liquidate these offending corporations, they will be liquidated and all their corporations, too.
The people of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales should not despair because of the appearance of the White Horse of the Apocalypse, nor fear any aspect of power projected by these Evil Men.
Everyone is reminded now and at all times that this is a "war" in the air jurisdiction, a war of beliefs and morals, a war of ideas and energies, claims and counterclaims, truth versus falsehood.
The White Horse of the Apocalypse signals "death" meaning death of the nations -- in this case, England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, and the rise of a faceless THING, a Corporation, that will attempt to kill the nations and subjugate the living people.
This is represented by the UK, aka, UNITED KINGDOM, a franchise of the UN CORPORATION.
All these corporations are steeped in blood, lies, misery, war for profit, and theft. All of them have conspired against the countries that gave birth to them. All are unnatural and have no natural right to exist. All are guilty of treason and conspiracy against the lawful governments.
All these corporations are, essentially, lies called "Legal Fictions". The operant word is "Fiction" -- these things don't actually exist. They are divorced from reality by at least one full click.
Thus, you can see why they are the creations of the Father of All Lies, and also why the men seduced by these THINGS, are, knowingly or unknowingly, Idolaters and Satanists.
The nature of the government you are subscribing to is shown by the law and the money you use.
We have shown everyone that the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE is not money and that it has no actual value. It's a graven image in the language of the Bible -- an idol merely representing value, the same way that stone statues and icons "represent" gods and saints.
The same is true of the EURO and any other fiat currency.
The voluntary use of a fiat currency condemns the people using it to a fantasy-land, the proverbial Land of Oz, in which people are converted into PERSONS, and the only crimes are commercial ones.
It's all just lies and hoaxes, complete with Wicked Witches that "dissolve", that is, are "liquidated" by a simple bucket of cold water.
That is what "King" Charles III and every member of the Privy Council needs poured over their heads right about now. And every member of Parliament.
Ditto Jorge Bergoglio and the members of the Roman Curia.
All the Officers of the EU. All the Officers of the UN.
They all have to be more than half-mad to think that they can get away with what they have proposed -- that we bow down and worship Satan instead of kicking their fantasmagorical asses and holding these corporations to account.
These madmen appear to believe that the way to Heaven on Earth is through Falsehood of every kind; they are inured to think that Lies are holy, poverty and ignorance are a blessing, and every other kind of self-serving excuse for abusing and mistreating others is Divine Order.
All that is really needed, is a single well-placed international realization of what these white-collar (literally) criminals have done.
And a bucket of water.
Failing that, you know what else they have planned next for everyone -- the black horse of starvation.
We can just cut to the chase, folks. We know the narrative by heart.
No need to go through the death of nations, the starvation, the war, or the conquest of glory. We've all been here, done that, and now, enough is bloody well enough.
Every Officer of the Church, every Officer of the American Military, every Officer of the Allied Forces, it's your duty to return the government to the people of each country that has been impacted by this gigantic fraud scheme.
Admit it and return the purloined assets. Do it now, before these Sociopaths cause broad spectrum worldwide disruption of food supplies and supply chains.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
February 25th 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Sunday, February 25, 2024
For Declared Americans Only
By Anna Von Reitz
Read every word of this carefully and especially notice all the bits and pieces that are enclosed by parenthesis, as these annotations show you where you need to add your own name or information, and provide further explanation.
As our research has fully revealed, we have been the victims of a national-level identity theft scheme.
The scheme has resulted in American babies being misidentified and registered as British Territorial U.S. Citizens. That has further resulted in the creation of Municipal Corporation franchises operated as "slaves" in our NAMES.
In order to overcome all this skullduggery and breach of trust by our own public employees, we have taken action and self-declared our interest in our own estates and Good Names and have recorded and published this in public, to overcome any mere Legal Presumption that we ever waived our birthright via any Third Party donation made by our Mothers acting without full disclosure, nor any unconscionable contract obligating us to act as U.S. Citizens or later as US CITIZENS at all.
So now you have "declared" your correct political status as an American and have recorded and published this change.
This forthcoming information is information that only you can make use of, so it is specifically directed to members of our State Assemblies and American State Nationals who may or may not be active in their State Assembly, but who have nonetheless done the paperwork to recoup their birthright political status.
*****CAUTION!!!***** If anyone tries to use this information who has not gone through the Declaration, Recording, and Publishing process, they will land in jail, and probably for a very long time!
*****CAUTION!!!*****you may have to remind the court that the Estate you are claiming is bonded against loss by the Bond Number disguised as a File Number on your State of State Birth Certificate and is additionally indemnified against claims brought by the Municipal CORPORATION and their franchises by The United States of America AMRI 00001 RA 393 427 640 US Indemnity Bond lodged with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY.
There are two foreign court systems gunning for you, a fact that you are probably very much aware of, because you and your parents going back several generations have been mercilessly hounded by your own public employees and dragged into their courts and been coerced and fined and jailed under the presumption that you are a public employee, too, or the dependent of a public employee.
We are now going to teach you how to defend yourself against these obnoxious "impositions" and False Legal Presumptions.
The moment you are misaddressed by one of their officers or courts you must set the ground rules by issuing a competent denial of their offer to contract and provide you with their "services".
It is always preferable to do this in writing, but can also be done in court if you have been arrested and dragged into a situation you didn't allow or ask for.
First, note that as a living man or woman, you are not acting as a "person" and therefore cannot issue an Affidavit by definition. You can't make any kind of pleading before their courts at all. So, give that, what can you do?
You can give "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit". You can also "fully inform" them (that is, report a crime).
This is, in fact, what all the "United States" and State-of-State franchise Courts require as part of the Rules of Civil Procedure; if you don't observe this fine point, and issue an "Affidavit" instead, they can go ahead and presume that you are not acting as a living man or woman and are acting as a "Person" instead.
(Please note that I and my husband have both acted as Persons in the past and have issued Affidavits, but that doesn't mean that you should! We knew what we were doing when we did it and were properly papered up and prepared to take that action. Most Americans are not similarly enabled and don't have to be, so don't make Affidavits.)
The yielding to their jurisdiction happens when you: (1) voluntarily appear in their Court/COURT; or (2) make any Motion or Pleading whatsoever.
You may not know it, but you are appearing to grant them jurisdiction over you and your property when you enter pleas or go to their courts.
So how do you reply to their summons and warrants and citations and other nonsense, without granting them any jurisdiction?
If you receive a written summons or similar correspondence either by process server or via the mail (which they are using less often because they got in trouble with the postal authorities) you write back to them and right up front, in the first gasp, you issue a series of "denials" and counter-offers, like this:
Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit
Please receive my compliments in response to the process summons attached and returned to the Court, without, however, mistaking any aspect of this communication as an offer of contract, acceptance of contract, representation, commercial correspondence, any acceptance of legal representation, or action in rem. The Court may, of course, appoint their Attorney to represent their fictitious Defendant, but in no case shall any such Attorney represent me, nor shall any claim against any such fictitious Defendant/DEFENDANT attach to me, my Estate, my assets, my credit, or any beneficial derivative belonging to me.
This blanket denial and refusal to contract sets the playing field and begins to define the rules of engagement for them. Similar verbal replies will work for you in any situation where you are arrested.
Then you will want to begin laying down specific denials according to the circumstance. Most of the time the first COURT you will encounter will be a Municipal COURT of some kind, which is limited to dealing with Municipal franchise CORPORATIONS engaged in some form of Maritime Commerce.
For General Purposes, no matter what kind of court they present, you will want to present a list of objections and denials like this:
Part 1: Denials: What I am not and what I object to:
1. I am not a Bar Attorney, Lawyer, or any Human Person engaged in any titled profession and I owe no licensed or dependent obligation, no pledge, title, performance or allegiance to any foreign incorporated entity, government, or organization, not limited to the Bar Association, the Roman Catholic Church, the British Territorial United States, the Municipal United States Government, or any franchise, incorporation, agency or Agent thereof;
2. I am neither a U.S. Citizen nor a Municipal citizen of the United States; I adopt and hold no citizenship obligation or franchise agreement with respect to the District of Columbia, the District Government, or the Municipal United States or its Government;
3. I am not a dependent of any District or Agency Personnel, United States Persons or Municipal PERSONS presumed to exist in the realm of Legal Fiction as foreign corporations operating under some form or permutation or variation of my Given Name or some foreign sign language known variously as Dog Latin or American Sign language appearing to represent my name;
4. I am not a corporation nor am I representing any corporation;
5. I am not a public trust nor am I representing any public trust;
6. I hold the only survivorship interest in the (Your Name in Upper and Lower Case) Estate and I did not authorize the construction of any District or Municipal Corporation operating under the sign (the name of the DEFENDANT)in any form or under any section of Municipal Code; nor did I authorize the registration of any Territorial Person that may be using my Good Name under presumption of a Public Usufruct;
7. I do not use the name (DEFENDANT or Defendant's name) or any ordering or permutation thereof in commerce or as a Legal Fiction under Admiralty Law;
8. I do not need and have never needed any conferred citizenship and am not stateless and have never been stateless;
9. I am not a colored person of any kind; not a slave, not a criminal, not a pauper, not a dependent or employee or citizen of any Federal Corporation, not a DEBTOR, not a Debtor, not an indentured servant, and not a bankrupt person of any kind; I don't accept or adopt any denigrated political status;
10. I am not a Felon against my Public Law;
11. I am not waiving my birthright estate/Estate;
12. I am not the subject of any foreign infant decedent Estate;
13. I am not the cargo aboard any foreign Vessel;
14. I am not the subject of and not subject to the 14th Amendment known as a citizen of the United States under any authority thought to still exist under the so-called Corporate Constitution of the United States of America, Incorporated, first published in 1868, which was never ratified by my States of the Union;
15. I am not an Enemy of the British Territorial United States nor of the United States of America, Incorporated;
16. I am not a “Sovereign Citizen” and I object to any inference or insinuation that I am ignorant or that I avow an oxymoron as a political status;
17. I am not a “Human”, not an indentured servant, nor a “Slave” nor any Volunteer, nor any kind of Tort Feasor against the Federal Constitutions and I do not voluntarily act as a Tort Feasor against Article I, Section 10 thereof;
18. I object to the use of Federal Reserve Notes; I do not voluntarily use Federal Reserve Notes; I have no Federal Income according to the U.S. Supreme Court as I am not a “Federally connected” TAXPAYER operating as a voluntary franchisee of any foreign Municipal Corporation and have no corporate profit separated from capital that could stand as “Federal Income”; no evidence of debt presented as an I.O.U. or other form of Promissory Note, such as a FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE can be considered actual payment or profit in hand; additionally, I am not a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marine known as a “Taxpayer” (to the King) and am not lost at sea; I am not a Driver or other Person employed in any commercial avocation related to the Admiralty nor am I voluntarily operating in any form of Maritime Commerce;
19. I do not accept the American Civil War or any “War” since then as anything but Mercenary Conflicts that are not owed the dignity of the Law of War or the Law of Peace as there was no official and required Declaration of War by the Several States in Congress Assembled related to their onset, and I do not recognize the existence of or need for any British Territorial Military Protectorate related to me on the land and soil of my own country when our own State Assemblies are in Session;
20. I do not accept any claim that I am rendered an Enemy while at the same time my Estate is being charged for services as an Employer and when my States have never participated in these conflicts;
21. I do not accept any foreign public trust interest in the (Your Name in Upper and Lower Case) Estate based on an undisclosed unconscionable birth registration contract nor any private trust interest created by any foreign baptism nor other undisclosed contract with any incorporated Church nor any derivative contracts based on these presumptions of contract, pledge, or allegiance.
22. I Notice that all the so-called Western Territorial States have been enrolled as actual States of the Union since October 1st 2020, and this was made retroactive to the date these States entered Territorial Statehood, so there is no longer any presumption against any of the people born in these States of the Union.
The important points to get across right up front are these:
1. You are not an attorney and don't accept being represented by an attorney; if the Court/COURT wants to hire an attorney to defend or prosecute their own phony foreign franchise DEFENDANT that's their business, but no attorney will represent you or your estate.
2. You are the one that has the survivorship interest in the (Your Name) Estate;
3. You are not a corporation of any kind and aren't representing or acting for any corporation of any kind;
4. You object to the use of FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES or any other kind of promissory note "as" money and don't consider the receipt of these I.O.Us to be any kind or payment or profit.
5. If you live in any of the States that entered any "statehood" after the Civil War, your State has been officially enrolled as a State of the Union and you no longer labor under any Territorial Statehood claims.
If there is a money claim being asserted by any of these commercial banks -- property taxes, franchise taxes, mortgages, income taxes, etc., you will additionally remind them that:
1. "Money" does not include treasury notes". Foquet v. Headley, 3 Conn. 534, 536;
2. …."In legal acceptation, "money" means current metallic coins; therefore, an indictment for embezzling "money" is not sustainable by proof of embezzling greenbacks or national currency notes." Block v. State, 41 Tex. 620, 622.
3. …."The term "money" does not include bank notes. They pass as cash, and constitute a part of the circulating medium, and for many purposes are to be considered as money; but, in the strict sense of the term, they are not included therein." Dowdle v. Corpening, 32 N.C. 58,60.”
4. …. "Money," as used in the Crimes Act, section 13, providing that any person stealing any money, the property of another, shall be guilty of larceny, cannot be construed to include bank bills, for strictly bank bills are not money, though for many purposes they are treated as such." Johnson v. State, 11 Ohio St. 324,325.
5. …. "The term "money," in the statute defining robbery as taking from the person of another any money or personal property of any value whatsoever, with force and violence, and with intent to steal or rob, does not include bank notes." Turner v. State, 1 Ohio St. 422,426.
6. …."Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars." U.S. Treasury, General Counsel, Munk.
7. "Both notes and checks are acknowledgments of indebtedness and promise of payment." Hegeman v. Moon, 131 N.Y. 462, 30 N.E. 487. Smith v. Treuhart et al, 223 N.Y.S. 481;
8. It follows that all the (Your Name in Upper and Lower Case) Estate ever received as “payment” for any goods or services from Federal Corporations or their Employees are promises to pay, otherwise known as I.O.U’s or Promissory Notes, in this case, FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES;
9. It also follows that as the Inheritor of the assets and credit owed to (Your Name) you do not allow any private bill collectors to sue for the involuntary extension of more credit to Municipal Corporation franchises appearing to be named after the foreign Estate;
10. It stands as public knowledge that the so-called Federal National Debt owed is now in excess of $35 Trillion Dollars;
11. Add to this that Federal U.S. Citizens and citizens of the United States have no ability to redeem fiat notes for United States Silver Dollars and are prohibited from doing so by Title 31 USC Section 408 which prohibits the redemption of any currency (that is, “Money of Account”) into gold, and Title 31 USC Section 405(a)-3 which prohibits the redemption of any United States currency dollar- for- dollar for gold /or/ silver, so that such foreign Persons/PERSONS are precluded from receiving actual payment and equally precluded from alleging any actual debt on the basis of commerce or trade using FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES;
12. Also, Notice that the Tax Lien Act of 1966 placed all such actions under the Uniform Commercial Code, and for a check to be a negotiable instrument, it must contain an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in money and be payable on demand or at a definite time (UCC 3-103 (b) (c)), a condition which no check issued in the current system can meet, which means that U.S. Citizens and Municipal citizens of the United States, like the Territorial Internal Revenue Service and Municipal IRS (can be any phony Creditor or set of Creditors like the First National Bank of BS or the SOUTH BRANCH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION) can only act as my Agents if I grant them permission to do so, and also means that no such Legal Fiction/FICTION entities, such as the Internal Revenue Service/IRS, (or First National Bank of Texas or HSBC) can act as Moving Parties alleging the existence of any actual debt based on Federal Reserve Notes, which are not “money” and checks which are not negotiable instruments;
13. Take Notice that fictional money results in fictional debts and fictional profits and fictional income, too; as FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES are debt notes by definition, the use of FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES or their transfer can never result in profit or income, either one; thus, any allegation that I or my Estate are in receipt of “Federal Income”, is fraudulent, null and void, and provides no basis for any court decision;
(Notice that you can use the same information to torpedo a mortgage claim -- you and your Estate didn't receive anything of value and so don't owe anything of value. Just substitute the name of the bank or other foreign Creditor: "Any allegation that I or my Estate received anything of value from First National Mortgage Bank and Trust in the form of a check transferring FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES or other Money of Account is fraudulent, null and void.")
14. The allegation of any debt owed by me or my Estate and based on Federal Reserve Notes, their transfer via non-negotiable checks, or additional accrual of debt by their collection, results in a fraudulent and constructive debt claim that the Moving Parties are incompetent to demand or receive; I and my Estate are not the Debtors; we are the ultimate Creditors, and must be held harmless by the Corporations and Principals acting as Usufructs;
15. Both the assets and the credit based upon the assets of the (Your Name in Upper and Lower Case) Estate are owed to me; I cannot possibly owe a debt to myself for the unauthorized abuse of my own credit or the involuntary extension of my credit in the form of a FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE; and I have not approved the Moving Parties nor their attorneys to collect any such debt on my behalf;
16. The Gold Bullion Act of 1985 makes it clear that Americans, such as myself, are not obligors or grantors with respect to the Federal Reserve Banks and their Notes--- Public Law 99-185, December 17, 1985, 99 Statutes 1177.
17. In Witness of all the foregoing, I am acting to prevent crime and to fully inform the Court, so that justice may be served and fact be honored and I affirm the foregoing account to be true and complete and not misleading, honorable and peacefully intended; and so, I have placed my hand seal and signature upon this paper for purpose of Witness only on this _____ day of __________in the year of __________.
You can now see the logic of all this.
You owe nothing to these banks; they owe you.
They make up a Legal Fiction named after you.
They use these "things" for their benefit.
They act as Usufructs.
They are obligated not to harm you.
But they do.
They can't even allege a debt.
They can't receive actual payment.
The whole thing is a British Corporate hoax.
It's a con game to defraud you.
They exchange their notes for your substance.
Then they go bankrupt.
And claim that their debts are your debts.
So that on top of everything else....
You get stuck paying their debts to you.
That is how they grossly enrich themselves.
--at your expense, and double dip on the way.
This is why we foreclosed on them.
This is why their banks are insolvent.
This is why you should resist the crooks.
Under International Law....
Under Nuremberg Code....
Under the Geneva Conventions....
Under the Hague Conventions....
It is illegal and unlawful to pay taxes
To any organization involved in genocide.
Feel free to tell any of these courts.
In addition to all the foregoing....
These corporations have funded genocide
And war for profit for generations.
You just became aware of this.
You don't want to be an accomplice.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)