By Anna Von Reitz
Throughout our history a device meant to prevent confusion has been used to promote it, instead.
This confusion is based on a simple difference in language conventions.
In English, Proper Nouns, including our names, are capitalized, and they appear overall in Upper and Lower Case: John Paul Engstrom, or Ann Margaret Clark, follow the same convention as Saint Paul, Minnesota. This "style convention" assigns no particular social or political or caste system implication, except that when the definite article "the" is included in the Proper Name, as in "The United States", it does imply singularity, that is, we are the one and only United States.
In Latin, at least since the days of Emperor Justinian, the naming convention is dual purpose, with different style conventions implying the political status or seniority of the person or thing being named.
The patrician class of Romans was named using all small letters: thus, josephus flavius gaius was a patrician class Roman; while Josephus Flavius Gaius was an indentured servant (or military officer or political official), and JOSEPHUS FLAVIUS GAIUS was a slave, because of debt, or crime, or being subject to conquest.
Thus, in English, The United States is simply a Proper Name standing for our country as a whole, while "the United States" might mean anything, but has traditionally meant a business or incorporated entity called the United States.
However, please notice --- in Latin, "the United States" indicates superior authority or power, while in English, "the United States" indicates a lesser or less defined entity of lesser authority.
Romans seeing "the United States" assume that they are talking to the superior power, while Americans and Englishmen assume the opposite.
As English is our official language, the Americans and Englishmen would be right in their interpretation of the situation.
The United States is the proper name of our country and The United States of America is the proper name of our Federation of States.
Any business or corporation or incorporated entity operating as any form of "the United States" or "the United States of America" is decidedly inferior. In English. Not in Latin.
So, Latin-language speakers see "the" and think this means the entity is superior in nature and authority; English speakers think the exact opposite.
The English interpretation wins, because our official language is English.
When it came time to name our Federal Subcontractors, all three (3) adopted "the" as a result of the English language conventions and the fact that as Subcontractors exercising delegated powers assigned to them by higher authorities, they were subordinate.
Thus the three Federal Subcontractors did business as the United States operated by the States of America, the United States of America operated by the Territorial Government(s), and the United States Municipal (or Civil) Government.
The delegating authorities did business as The United States (Union) and The United States of America (Federation). Both of these are unincorporated instrumentalities of the sovereign nation-states.
Everyone knows that the Federal Government here exercises 18 enumerated "Powers" that are delegated to them.
Ever wonder who or what made the delegation?
That is, who or what the "Delegators" were/are?
The State Citizens of each State of the Union (State Assembly) individually and severally voted to delegate these certain, enumerated "powers" (and duties) to be performed by the Federal Subcontractors.
Prior to this assignment created by the various Federal Constitutions of 1787, 1789, and 1790, respectively, the "mutually held powers" were defined and consolidated and held by the Federation of States acting as an unincorporated holding company and trust.
Each State conveyed the "powers" to be delegated, these were combined as mutual powers held in trust by the Federation, and then delegated to the respective Federal Subcontractors.
So which came first, the chicken (land jurisdiction) or the egg (nation-state soil jurisdiction)? Each can be said to be a delegator of these delegated powers, in a sense, but in actual order of jurisdiction, each State was only able to commit its own enumerated powers to the pot, and the actual delegation was made of their mutual powers collected and held by the Federation of States.
Thus, the Federation of the States of the Union is the actual delegator of the "delegated powers" --- and that's who we are.
We are the delegators of all those "delegated powers" everyone likes to talk about.
Finally, we wish to give everyone notice that we are also the delegators of all powers possessed by the original States of America Confederation and the so-called Federal Republic.
The Federation of States and the Union States underlying their efforts are American Government instrumentalities and once properly restored to full function themselves, they will be able to "restore" the Federal Republic.
However, notice to agents is notice to principals and Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents--- it is impossible for anyone registered as a British Territorial U.S. Citizen to "restore" any Federal Republic associated with us.
This is true because they never had a Federal Republic of their own to begin with and therefore can't "restore" one that never existed prior to this, and secondarily, they can't restore our Federal Republic (1787-1861) "for" us, because we never authorized them to act on our behalf regarding this action (never delegated that power to contract), and because while they individually retain British Territorial U.S. Citizenship they are literally acting as foreigners and adopting the same political status as someone born in the Commonwealth nation of Puerto Rico.
Acting in this capacity and pretending to represent us in this matter, they could create their own version of "a" Federal Republic but they can never restore ours, the only Federal Republic that ever existed in this country prior to this.
Thus, all this talk about the "restored Federal Republic" being undertaken by Donald Trump and the U.S. Mercenary-Military, isn't a restoration. It's another substitution fraud being created either in ignorance or with malice aforethought.
Our efforts to restore our original American Government structure are indeed honest and we do have the lawful standing and character to literally restore both our vanished American Confederation and our American Federal Republic, which have been dormant since 1861.
Our British Territorial Subcontractors do not have the granted authority, jurisdiction, standing, or capacity to do this restoration work "for" us. And as we are the only ones who ever had a Federal Republic in the past, it stands to reason that they, while working for a foreign (British Territorial) government, are not able to "restore" anything related to our Federal Republic.
At most, they could voluntarily return the purloined assets of our Federal Republic to us, unharmed, which is what the international and global law actually requires of them --- instead of jerking around, pretending to be us, pretending to have a Federal Republic of their own to "restore", and otherwise clouding issues that are crystal clear.
Their actions seizing upon our States and our Businesses and Corporations via their False Claims on Abandonment and claiming to own "the United States" (the doing business name of the unincorporated American Federal Republic) and its assets as of February 2nd 1871, were based on deliberate non-disclosure and constructive fraud against the actual owners -- our States and people. They have been the beneficiaries of an illegal and immoral "latching" activity that has been ongoing since then.
In effect, they already stole the assets of our Federal Republic once, and now, they are trying to avoid returning those assets to us by pretending to be us and pretending to restore our Federal Republic--- when they are acting in a foreign political status entirely.
It's a double-crossed double-cross, by public employees trying to hold onto control of our assets and find a way to exercise the powers we delegated to our own American Federal Subcontractor, without actually being American and without any contract to operate in lieu of our American Federal Subcontractor --- which is what they have been doing, based on contrived and unsupportable presumptions since 1861.
These same British Territorial Subcontractors have a history of Substitution Fraud and substituting their foreign British Commonwealth democracy for our American Government and our republican form of government.
It's a literal identity theft based on deceptively similar names, impersonation, and non-disclosure.
Most recently, they have tried to get us to "take the bait" and accept their British Territorial Estate Trust ($150 Trillion) -- leaving them to "inherit" our own gargantuan dodeca trillion estates, by substituting themselves for us-- literally pretending to be us-- and slipping into our place by mirroring us.
Thank God we know exactly who we are and who they are, and we are not falling for the old sleights of hand and substitutions worthy of any carnival sideshow -- substituting their British Territorial democracy for our American republican States, substituting their "states of states" for ours, they'd love to pass off their $150 T trust fund as ours -- which would leave them free to claim all the assets and credit that are legitimately ours and worth unimaginably more.
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents: these attempted substitution frauds must be brought to an end and all historical, heritage, and so-called legacy trusts must be dissolved in favor of the actual owners -- the actual living people and their States of the Union.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
May 16th 2025
-----------------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
