By Anna Von Reitz
This came in yesterday thanks to "Carpenter".
Most people reading this won't know what to think of the raw data and what
it means, so I will interpret it for you. Give a copy to all the judges,
lawyers, and bankers you know. Shove their noses in it and rub
hard.
The Rats That Be are trying to rewrite their
contractual obligations to all of us by making up new legal terms and changing
the Uniform Commercial Code after the fact.
They are trying to claim that the banks invested in
us and our assets when in fact they solicited our investments in them under
false advertisement and cheated us out of any equitable consideration. And now
that they have willfully defaulted they want to seize our assets to pay off
their debts.
Remember when you first saw a sign advertising
"Home Loans"? Did you ever once think that the banks were advertising for
you to loan your home to them? Well, that is in fact what they have been doing
since 1933. The meaning of the sign changed and so did "the normal course
of business" --- they just didn't bother to tell
you.
During most of your lifetimes, what that "Home
Loans" sign meant was -- come here and loan us your house, so that we can loan
credit back to you and all the other poor schmucks who don't know any
better.
Normally, if you loan someone your assets as
collateral for them to loan credit back to you or anyone else, you get a hundred
percent of the value of the assets paid back to you off of the top.of the
transaction, plus another 30% at least as pure
profit.
But in the Great American Bank Scam, the banks got
a 100% value off of you and your assets, and then they loaned an amount 7 to 10
times the total out to other people just as defrauded and clueless as you were
when you walked through the door.
Instead of you getting 100% off the top, the State
of Whatever got its mortgage on your land and house paid off. Instead of
you getting 30-40% of the profit from this little swindle, you got to pay off 5
times the value of the total loan, so you got to pay the bank back to cover any
default by the other loans from the other marks that got credit as a result of
you loaning your house to these fiends.
Okay? Oh, and, you were given the privilege
of handing them over an unearned security interest in your assets,
too.
Now they are trying to pretend that they invested
in you, instead of you investing in them. And what in fact, if anything,
did they invest? Paper I.O.U.s that they never paid
off.
They are trying to pull this giant fraud off and
make it stick ----right in front of our faces--- using another “legal”
sleight of hand, when we have been owed lawful contracting processes
throughout.
Prior to 2015 when we brought our first
international claims and Notices they were operating under one version of
Article 9 and after 2015 they changed Article 9 to try to benefit themselves
again and now this—- third strike.
Please publish this far and wide together with the
fact that we do not accept their offer and are grandfathered in and do not
accept any new interpretation of Article 9 recognizing the banks as investors in
our assets nor do we agree to any representation of us or our
interests.
We do not "agree" to any of the changes in Article
9 and we do not "agree" to any security interest being claimed by the banks in
us or our assets --- any of our assets, including our labor, our children, our
land or anything else.
Everyone got that? The banks and the
securities corporations are all dirty. They are all culpable. And they are
trying to skin out of it, again, using more legalese and pure BS to grease their
wheels.
Those who have eyes --- here's Carpenter's
report:
The vermin just changed the Law/legal Definition
AGAIN, now on UCC § 9-607 - 9-610 to a NEW term "Investment control". The Banks
did not investment anything in people, they only extract -ed all people assets,
HJR192 credits, $IOU's, Trust, Bond, Gold, Slavery fund,
etc:
Cornell.edu just changed the legal definition of
the UCc 9-607... to Investment Control. Below is the old or current
definitions:
§ 9-607. COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT BY SECURED
...
APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS OF COLLECTION OR
ENFORCEMENT; LIABILITY FOR DEFICIENCY AND RIGHT TO SURPLUS. › Uniform Commercial
Code ...
U.C.C. - ARTICLE 9 - SECURED TRANSACTIONS (2010
...
9-607. COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT BY SECURED PARTY.
§ 9-608. APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS OF COLLECTION OR ENFORCEMENT; LIABILITY
...
1309.607. (UCC 9-607) Collection and enforcement by
...
(UCC 9-607) Collection and enforcement by secured
party. (A) If so agreed, and in any event after default, a secured party:
(1)
Uniform Commercial Code § 9-607. Collection and
...
Uniform Commercial Code § 9-607. Collection and
Enforcement by Secured Party, NY CLS UCC § 9-607. Summary. (a) Collection and
enforcement generally.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
.
ReplyDeleteThe Law of Necessity enacted in 1871 along with the war powers act and title 12 USC 319
created by a corporate democracy on or about 1860 Coup d'état when we went form a republic to the corporate democracy; went from Law to CODES. Definition of CODE = deceit
In a fiction (illusion) created by a fiction, known as corporation there is no fraud; as the fiction within itself say there is no fraud - can you say BAR Guild /Ass.
"It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows." - Epictetus
Appearances are of four kinds:
Things either are as they appear to be;
or they neither are nor appear to be;
or they are, but do not appear to be;
or they are not, and yet, appear to be. ~ Epictetus (55 – 135 AD) ~
“Intellect and Emotion are partners who do not speak the same language. The intellect finds logic to justify what the emotions have already decided” ~ Roy H. Williams
“Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance.” - W. Clement Stone
“True wisdom comes to each of us when we realize how little we understand about life, ourselves, and the world around us.” - Socrates
Gratitude - keep moving forward
I recall in the early 80's working for a "direct mail marketing" service bureau (we massaged and output data)
ReplyDeleteAnd the newest HOT product which advert agencies were jumping into was the selling a new "direct mail Product" to the "banks," whereby they solicited the Presidents, etc. of the "banks" so as to have them offer (push) "Home Equity Loan" to various marketable populations.
I had lunch with these guys, both with the creative guy and his somewhat smarmy cuff-linked lead Marketing Campaign Corporate Level presenter. I recall they said it was somewhat a tough sell, because the banks would consider it "risky," but so lucrative that their greed would win out over their fear.
The marketing slug-line on one of their marketing envelops, read "Money from Home!" and was further adorned with warm art work depicting gentle flames emanating from a hearth.
Now that art-work akes be think of a "fire sale." Not sure that art made it past the bank's legal department.
The chat was this "HELOC" Product had a limited shelf life, they thought maybe five (5) years?
Back then I was preparing to buy a townhouse with an 11% interest rate loan.
The HELOCs (Home Equity Lines of Credit) turned out to have a much longer shelf life.
No, the "Banks" were not making any investment in the home owner. They were exhibiting Greed wining-out.
The Average Joe is too dumbed down by Fluoride to understand this and too programmed by the “system” to trust you on this since your work is not mainstream.
ReplyDeleteIf you want Pitchforks, show them the videotaped confessions regarding child-sex torture, murder, ritualistic abuse and cannibalism. Otherwise, you’re just whistling in the wind.
...and some may be just whistling past the graveyard. Would you not prefer to whistle into the wind?
DeleteBlah Blah Blah - Information without action = more procrastination. No one will take any action without seeing proof. This rabbit hole is so deep with no sign of a way out. You beat the IRS and prove its fraud and help others do the same then people might wake up to what the deceptive BAR flys are doing to rob US all blind . Till then everyone will remain asleep. We are easily dismissed as weird until a major fraud by the government is exposed for all to see. If income tax isnt the biggest scam then IDK what is?
ReplyDeleteThe biggest scam to me is the one where the banks pretend to "LEND" you money when in fact they owe you that money. INHO, the signed promissory note by you is the "NEW" money in the monetary system created by you, the so-called borrower. I learned this by going down the rabbit hole of "following the money".
DeleteMay Day
DeleteOperation Disable 4G
Make it so
Anna - Finally - you gave credit to the person that it is do "Carpenter" and you acknowledged it - that was one very "Transparent/Honest/Honorable" accomplishment! It was/is GREAT!
ReplyDeleteAND you actually posted the Links so we can "review/scrutinize/Prepare ourselves" for debate with Others!!
I have been waiting for this kind of "Detailed" Information from you for a LONG TIME.
So I am now being more vigilante in reading your Articles/Posts (again) - I have NOT been in the past year or so because of what I consider your "trespass" on the information that you "Glee" from other sources and "Presume" to have acquired the information all by yourself (and the Law Firm).
Now (if this trend keeps up) I will be waiting and eagerly reading/absorbing the information that you give out to all of us.
Your hard work and dedication has ALWAYS BEEN APPRECIATED - BUT when WE see articles/posts by others and then within 1 -3 days see that you post the same info (without the links to the SOURCE(s)), it is VERY Disturbing to US.
Those simple links are a Godsend! They allow us to "inform others" based on - NOT JUST ONE INDIVIDUALS WORD (who we do have faith in) - BUT we can point to the "Foundation(s)" of the words'posts/etc. and use that information to "Educate" others.
I Thank You!
Mr Charles S. What do you mean, The source is very disturbing to US? You got a mouse in your pocket?? The info is very well absorbed no mucking matter who it comes from as long as it is a fact/truth, no matter if it is 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or even 4th hand! as long its not watered down!
DeleteYeah, Chucky Schulte, speak for yourself or tose inept others who permitted you to speak for them.
DeleteYou do NOT speak for Victor nor myself.
Hope we are clear on this...
May Day
DeleteOperation Disable 4G
Make it so #1
These guys really are a set of 'one string banjos',...
ReplyDeleteFree to a good home,
A complete, and vintage, set of one string banjos...
#BCCRSS
ReplyDeleteAnd let's not forget the (to me) sine qua non of the UCC -- 9-402, which says, "secured party not obligated on contract of the debtor or in tort". When you file a UCC-1 financing statement and security agreement and make yourself, the living man or woman, the secured party and your STRAWMAN the debtor, you get into first lien position and all bets are off. UCC-9-402 then means "no bank or government agent can touch the living man or woman, but can send all the black and white paper they want to the mailbox of the DEBTOR" and the secured party can decide to contract, counteroffer, or use it for kindling. Or, if harassed and harmed sufficiently, file a liability suit with commercial lien power in the millions or billions (keep it payable and equitable to the damage done). G'night, Grandpa!
ReplyDelete