Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 5100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Monday, April 27, 2020

To Pope Francis: No Deal.


By Anna Von Reitz

For the past ten years I have listened to no end of freebooters and wannabes making claims based on their ancestors.  I don't entertain such claims because I don't deal with the Kingdom of the Dead.  I am alive, therefore, I belong to the Kingdom of the Living.  

Simple enough, isn't it? 

Don't tell me that the blood of King Poobah La-Dee-Dah runs in your veins and that that makes you "noble" and "royal" and all the rest of it.  

Nobody and nothing makes you "noble" but you and your own thoughts, words, and deeds, right here and right now. 

The current regime has tried to exalt the Kingdom of the Dead over the Kingdom of the Living.  They have tried to impersonate living men as dead THINGS --- estate trusts, public transmitting utilities, public charitable trusts, and only the True God knows what else.  

It's all lies and bunko, pure, unadulterated crime.  False Registrations.  Fraudulent conveyancing of grammar.  Claims based on the blood of King La-Dee-Dah.  

So first there was the "Deal" that was never disclosed to operate the Federal Subcontractors as commercial corporations.  

And then there was the "New Deal" which was never disclosed, either, and which involved the literal enslavement of government employees---and anyone else that you merely claimed was a government employee or dependent --- but never actually were.   

And now, you are trying to rewrite the Uniform Commercial Code and apply it retroactively to save the guilty banks.  

We are calling fraud and damnation on this self-serving rewrite of Article 9 published by Cornell Law day before yesterday, and we are taking exception to its fraudulent aims and assumptions, such as pretending that the banks invested anything whatsoever of value in us or our assets, and we also call "Foul!" on pretending that any incorporation or trustees of such corporations have any representative role or agreements related to us.  

We don't even have a contract with THEM.  Our contract, Francis, is with you and the Queen and you both have cause to know what it says. 

The bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES, INC., cannot be settled absent negotiation with the actual Priority Creditors--- the American States and People, represented in international and global affairs by their unincorporated Federation of States, doing business as The United States of America.   

Period. 

Mr. Trump has no ability granted nor delegated to him to settle any such matters, much less Mr. Fink,  and neither does the Queen and neither do you, Francis.  

The members of the Galactic Council need their information updated and need the truth this time.  No more shimmy-shuffle dances and excuses about your keymasters.  

Here's the only key that matters ---- by Operation of Law, all delegated powers return to the grantors when the grantee is incapacitated.  

It was the Curia's decision, which we did not approve, to operate the Federal Subcontractors as commercial corporations.  

It was their decision to bankrupt both the Municipal and Territorial commercial corporations and to immorally and illegally seek protection of bankruptcy for their criminal profits--- all of which are based on fraud, racketeering, False Registration processes, unconscionable contracts, adhesion contracts, and other white collar crimes your bully boys have pulled here. 

You have been trying to avoid all the uncomfortable and inconvenient facts for the better part of twenty years, but here they are, again, written in gold and underlined: 

The Curia is called to account.  
The military is called to account. 
The politicians are called to account. 
The bankers are called to account. 
The securities agents are called to account. 
The bonding companies are called to account.

We have said it and we mean it before the True God, and so let it be. 

You all chose to operate as corporations. Your free choice.  Nobody was awake at the time to stop you, so you had your way.  

So now you reap the results of that decision and all your decisions to let these corporations run roughshod over the living people of this country, and your decision to allow them to use False Registrations and DOG LATIN against the innocent, and your decision to get in bed with the banks and fornicate, fornicate, fornicate.

Shame on you all.  

 All of this is the fault of the Curia and the Pontiffs and the Popes and the British Monarchs and the Lord Mayors of London and nobody else's.  It is well-past the time for twisting and turning and trying to post some more false claims to save yourselves---retroactively, no less. 

Your self-interested rewrite of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code is not accepted, and even if were, it would not apply to us and the chain of title we established in 1998 and again in 2007 and again now.  

Take Notice --- Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. 

We are grandfathered in and we brought the American States and People with us.   Suck it up and pay up, Francis. 

All our land grants and patents and all titles and trusts collapsed and returned to us.  Our gold, our Special Deposits, our "Legacy Trusts" returned to us.  Our good names and other intellectual property returned to us.  Our Lawful Money, our banking system, our facilities and our public properties returned to us.   All free and clear of debt or encumbrance.

That is the Deal and it is the only Deal on the table. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

17 comments:

  1. .
    Who and what is the Pope

    Where did He-pope and or others get the written permission from The Creator to make a claim on or about 1213 that; A pope has declared that He is "Victor - Jesus Christ on earth" they-He owns the earth and everything in it/ on it.



    I have not seen any evidence - proof that The Creator gave a man that puts his pants on one leg at a time as every other man; no - any divine power.

    Further how do they change the Old Testament words into the New Testament to their advantage - By the Committee of Nicaea of 920 and 1550 ?

    I must be missing something that a man is above The Creator and can not abide by The Creators Laws - Which one; The one that says we the people must have a Jubilee - no pope, a man has declared one - Has He in the past 2000 years?


    Greatude - keep moving forward

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. .
      Has the pope:

      walked on water

      cured the blind

      Etc., etc.

      Why did they remove the statement- passages of Reincarnation on or about 550 AD? Among a great many other items.

      Why do they hide / have miles of caverns in Italy with documentation of the distant past and not bring forth the proof of anything they claim or disclaim ?

      Why do they have 3 very expensive telescopes looking for God?

      Why indeed?


      Gratitude - keep moving forward

      Delete
    2. Well Max. the only thing i see that you missed, He don't put on pants! He wears a dress!!

      Delete
    3. OMG... so funny. That's a good one Victor.

      Delete
    4. (at least one of) the bible jesuses claims he was before the god(s) of abraham and moses.

      old frescoes/paintings/artwork/bibles roman and orthodox and perhaps others -- showed christ creating the world and adam and eve, etc. for this reason.

      it is in order to set up a false "2nd coming" that this has been changed in more recent centuries -- so that "the lord" can send his "2nd coming" "root and stock of david" son.

      "a tremendous satire" -- albert pike, morals and dogma, re: john's apocalypse

      so yes, bible jesus makes the claim he did basically create the world and preceded "the lord" of e.g. genesis.

      so it is perfectly plausible IMO that any "pope" or any other "christ"-related group claims to have higher authority than old test. "the lord" and those worshippers.

      nothing "popish" about this -- any other "christian" group would do the same. "real god" outranks "fake god"

      "noone goes to the father except through me" -- bible jesus.

      it doesn't concern me if people deny jesus (any version) etc. -- but i hope you are not claiming everyone is supposed to be under jewish old test. "the lord" -- that is amazingly hypocritical, and the entire reason christ supposedly had to rescue people -- because "the lord" has no heart, amongst other things.

      moses put people to death too -- idol worship -- supposedly he couldn't get into heaven because of this.

      i believe muslims (related/spin-off, or vice versa, e.g. according to ucadia docs, or at least person-pretending-to-be-ucadia who-used-to-post-here -- i dont know if frank o collins has anything to do with all ucadia docs or "authorizes" it)

      it does concern me because this is pretty basic stuff everyone should have some idea of the competing "religions" whatever your beliefs, you can confirm even e.g. with wikipedia pictures/links to old paintings/frescoes/bibles/etc. -- they show a christ-like character not "our father who art in heaven (jewish guy with a beard)" creating adam and eve and the garden and the world.

      the fact you haven't done even basic research and are lashing out at strawmen is concerning. and promoting the masonic luciferian god while doing so.

      "to the mason, god is our father in heaven ; he is our father , and we are all brethren" -- albert pike, morals and dogma.

      iota alpha omega is the "lost word of gnosticism" (the book of the words) -- this explains "2nd coming" son of "the lord" as well.

      so, as luciferian as vatican II is, the masonic luciferian old test. "god" is not much of an improvement IMO.

      in fact, it is the same entity that the vatican II promotes -- they just promote the son of the devil instead of the devil.

      "a lying, deceiving, jealous god"
      "the day of the lord is darkness and not light"
      etc.

      Delete
    5. only orthodox torah-following "jews" should be doing "old test." stuff. noone else. no "jewish homeland" until their messiah arrives -- not before. noone is supposed to try and "speed up" this process.

      illuminist-created "reform" and "conservative" judaism also were apparently created to try and trigger the apocalypse.

      and one can easily see how hitler was created to try to justify a jewish homeland -- basically "trigger the apocalypse" again.

      so, the "kingdom of the lord" is a thing all right -- when everyone denies christ, or gets deceived, then that 2nd coming "messiah" is supposed to appear.

      (this is noted e.g. in the talmud -- a messiah either comes when everything and every body is wrong, to save people from sin, or everything is right, to deceive people)

      hence, by deceiving everyone into worship of "the lord" then christ gets denied, and the hope is that this will cause the son of the morning star "messiah" to show himself. -------- again, orthodox torah-following jews prohibit anyone from trying to "trigger" this

      so it is quite amazing the illuminist and masons have ran around convincing people that old test. "the lord" is "the creator" -- when actual orthodox torah-following jews SHOULD NOT PROMOTE THIS TO OTHERS -- AND IT IS IMPLIED TO BE FORBIDDEN -- BECAUSE IT EFFECTIVELY AMOUNTS TO MAN TRYING TO "FORCE" A MESSIAH TO APPEAR by making everyone be "damned"

      i think the "jewish encyclopedia" is correct that kaballists have also infected many "jewish" things.

      so, congratulations on playing right into the luciferian masons hands. please do better research in the future.

      Delete
    6. it should also be pointed out there are a few bible lines about the synagogue of satan, those who say they are jews and are not.

      people (pharisees?) sitting in moses' seat. -- etc.

      which is basically what your post amounts to. please try harder in the future.

      if you are a freemason, that is your "right" to promote luciferianism i suppose, but i'm not sure you have any idea what you are saying.

      Delete
    7. should also be noted:
      ---------------
      (this is noted e.g. in the talmud -- a messiah either comes when everything and every body is wrong, to save people from sin, or everything is right, to deceive people)
      ----------------
      so that was why christ had to come -- because "everyone was wrong" -- because old test. "the lord" is the devil and has no heart, doesn't actually love his children, was probably just a group of egyptian magicians/alchemists, amongst other issues.

      (this is e.g. what montauk website implies -- that christ was necessary, real or imagined, because some prior magicians had screwed up with "the lord" and they basically had to get people off of this destructive entity trying to take over everything and overthrow all the other religions, etc.)

      so even the modern-day "gnostics" agree with "the lord" being the devil and "christ" having been necessary -- at least at the time, real or imagined -- to save people from this demonic "corrupted demiurge"

      i suppose christ would not be necessary if it wasn't for "the lord" trying to own everyone and everything and conquer all the world and every other religion -- but since you are apparently making that claim now, 2000 years later -- i guess christ is still needed for the time being.

      Delete
    8. modern day vatican II is all about "the lord's prayer" so i really don't get what you are complaining about.

      so are mormons. so are other masons. it has an occult versicle -- as above, so below. make earth as it is in heaven.

      ergo, if the devil sneaks into the trinity, then he can get people praying to him, and the world and everyone in it eventually belongs to him.

      vatican II is promoting the same masonic/illuminist "the creator" you speak of. and trying to give the world over to the devil.

      so i'm not sure what you are whining about -- that an anti-pope wears a dress while he attempts to give the world to the devil?

      its like someone gives you 2 million dollar notes, redeemable for gold or silver on demand, no strings attached, but you notice one of the $1,000 bills has a mustache drawn on it with sharpie, so you refuse to accept it, even after every merchant in the world says that is not a big deal and they would still accept it.

      Delete
    9. if you worship "the creator" then the vatican II guy wearing a dress who does "the lords prayer" and "the lord" etc. -- THATS YOUR POPE. the 2nd coming "tremendous satire" one.

      geez, the masonic dupes are DENSE and A LITTLE SLOW sometimes.

      you are complaining that your own masonic illluminist representative is wearing a dress while leading people to hell? masons are weird.

      Delete
    10. 1 Corinthians 1 17 to 25

      [17] For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not in wisdom of speech, lest the cross of Christ should be made void. [18] For the word of the cross, to them indeed that perish, is foolishness; but to them that are saved, that is, to us, it is the power of God. [19] For it is written: I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the prudence of the prudent I will reject. [20] Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this world? Hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

      [21] For seeing that in the wisdom of God the world, by wisdom, knew not God, it pleased God, by the foolishness of our preaching, to save them that believe. [22] For both the Jews require signs, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: [23] But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews indeed a stumbling block, and unto the Gentiles foolishness: [24] But unto them that are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. [25] For the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
      ----------
      [25] "The foolishness": That is to say, what appears foolish to the world in the ways of God, is indeed most wise; and what appears weak is indeed above all the strength and comprehension of man.

      Delete
  2. UCC is created by Attorneys the NLA has assembled a Common law Grand Jury and sent both houses of Congress Trump Supreme Court and Attorney general Barr Notice of crimes s by what authority did treasury secretary creat IRS ?by what authority does congress creat statutes and codes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NLA is bogus.. I helped start it. When it went off the tracks and John Viduerek aka John Darash became Emporer we bugged out and started studying and researching . I have spent the better part of 18 years on this .

      Delete
  3. I know pretty much he train record the NLA but right on a lot of things they supposed to have 50 states with grand juries do you think they are that big?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. last i checked their web site urged people to fill out "voter registrations" as part of their civic duty -- which, all i have seen, and supremelaw.org webmaster also alluded to, are only for "us citizens" (and variants) and then they "reside" in a "state [of state?]" i.e. 14th amendment stuff.

      bouvier's 1856 also notes that the "national gov." is the feds. so "national assembly" of federal citizens -- perhaps they are fine.

      but i don't think they have any authority to run common law courts, whatever "grand juries" or "states" are not the actual several states of the american union, etc.

      just more federal citizens run amok. *maybe* they have some authority -- but not for actual states or as any actual "we the people"

      this was recent too when i saw their website -- so if they have changed any of this as one poster on this site implied re: paperwork needed to expatriate from presumed "federal citizenship" -- they haven't updated their website(s) apparently.

      Delete
    2. and, i believe anna is correct in prior posts re: "your "nation" is your "state" " -- i believe that is correct, for state citizens and/or state nationals.

      so even if NLA was correct in "national assembly" being "federal" -- amongst other things, "there is no general federal common law" -- properly, there is no "federal common law" at all, of any kind, because the feds only have delegated authority, have no land, have no natives people (properly) -- and hence have no unwritten, local traditions and values and law, etc.

      so even if they are doing some "federal citizens national assembly" "CORRECTLY" -- i don't see how any of it could possibly be proper american common law, or actual states and "we the people" or the several states of the american union, etc.

      in short, they at best seem to represent themselves only -- same as the current "feds"

      Delete
  4. Life has returned. Animus Corpus is ended.

    ReplyDelete