Katherine Watt "Library" and Believe It or Not....

 By Anna Von Reitz

There are certain of those among us whose work I follow, and Katherine Watt is one of them.  She has been working tirelessly on issues that run a wide gamut of inter-related interest: church and state relations, the history and nature of the bioweapons recently deployed, and the legal matrix surrounding both. 

For those of you who want a deep, incisive, and timely dive, go here: 

 https://substack.com/@bailiwicknews and start browsing.  This is the free version link.  There is also a paid version to help support her work. 

Katherine describes herself as a "Gen-X Catholic" and so when she focuses on the history of religion, politics, etc., she comes at it from a Catholic background.  Don't let that stop you.  That is actually helpful, because so much of what we take for granted, both good and bad, has its genesis either in the Church or as a result of Church interactions with government or the Church acting as a government. 

Katherine's writing won't be everyone's cup of tea.  She's academic by nature and to the bone, so her approach is rigorous, her subject matter is daunting, and she is often at pains to provide what she called "orientation for new readers" --- trying to bring people up to speed. 

Still, like a slice of mental cheesecake, you will be rewarded for making the effort to read Katherine's material.  She never takes you on a wild goose chase and doesn't belabor her presentation.   

I do not recommend John Curren Chapman's "work" overall, mainly because he so often gets lost in suppositions and arcana, but, at the same time, he occasionally digs up bones that are truly worthwhile. 

Here's some meat from his fork, extracted: 

Question: Do self-assembling nano-particles in the form of graphene exist? 

Answer:   Yes, self-assembling nanoparticles in the form of graphene do exist. For example, scientists have shown that colloidally synthesized zero-dimensional gold nanoparticles of various sizes can be deterministically self-assembled in highly-ordered, anisotropic, non-close-packed, multi-scale morphologies with templates designed from instability-driven, deformed 2D nanomaterials1. Another example is the ultra-fast self-assembly and stabilization of reactive nanoparticles in reduced graphene oxide films. 

Question: Is it possible for nano particles to enter the body of an animal and affect/effect the RNA/DNA relationships of the animal?

Answer: Yes, it is possible for nanoparticles to enter the body of an animal and affect its RNA/DNA relationships. When nanoparticles come into the vicinity of the cellular system, chances of uptake become high due to their small size. This cellular uptake of nanoparticles enhances its interaction with DNA, leading to structural and functional modification into the DNA1. For example, nanomaterials for nucleic acid delivery offer an unprecedented opportunity to overcome drawbacks; owing to their tunability with diverse physico-chemical properties, they can readily be functionalized with any type of biomolecules/moieties for selective targeting. 

Question:  Is it possible for nanoparticles to be managed or manipulated through the use of 5G radio frequencies?

Answer: No information found.

Question: What outside energy can control the self assembly process of graphene nanoparticles?

Answer: One way to control the self-assembly process of graphene nanoparticles is through the use of an electric field. For example, an alternating-current electric field can be used to align stacks of graphene nanoparticles and identify the control parameters of chain-formation in an epoxy polymer1. Another way is through electrostatic interactions between nanoparticles, which can reinforce the superstructure and regulate the assembly in the form of attractive or repulsive force. The rational design and control of interparticle electrostatic forces can help achieve effective self-assembly. 

[So, although there is no information available in the scientific literature databases he consulted on the effect of 5G on the self-assembly process of graphene nano-particles per se, there is plenty of information about more generalized electro-magnetic effects.] 

Question: Is it scientifically possible for anyone to inject nano particles into a human bloodstream?

Answer: Yes, it is scientifically possible to inject nanoparticles into the human bloodstream. In fact, some vaccines rely on a nanoparticle delivery system 1. Injected nanoparticles usually end up in the organs that filter blood—liver, spleen, bone marrow and kidney 1. Nanoparticles can also be used for drug delivery and other medical applications. 

Question: Does 5G technology generate an electric field?

Answer: Yes, 5G technology produces a type of energy called electromagnetic radiation which creates an area called an electromagnetic field (EMF)1. Electromagnetic field measurements in 5G networks are necessary to prove that the maximum radiation is below a certain country-specific threshold.

-------

End of quoted materials --- this last Answer (above) relates directly to my prior inserted comment.  If electric fields in general can have effects on the self-assembly of graphene nano-particles, it is given that the electromagnetic field from 5G radiation could have an effect.  

So, connect the dots, folks. 

 

He gave the following links as resources: 

nature.com
nature.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
pubs.rsc.org

frontiersin.org
nature.com
nihrecord.nih.gov
pubs.acs.org
sciencedaily.com

arxiv.org
theverge.com
nature.com

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

Nomenclature and Ownership, Again

 By Anna Von Reitz

Some people are confused by the fact that both the foreign corporations residing in the District of Columbia are "Municipal Corporations".  

A Municipal Corporation is a kind of corporation just like a "Red Delicious" is a kind of apple.  

A Municipal Corporation structure can be used to organize and administer military services just as well as it can be used to organize and administer civil services, so that is what we have going on here. 

The District of Columbia as a whole is operated by a Municipal Corporation dba "the United States of America, Incorporated" while a separate enclave within the District of Columbia is carved out and operated as another Municipal Corporation dba "the United States, Incorporated".   

One, the District Government, is devoted to military operations and military personnel populations, and the other, the Municipal Government within the Municipality of Washington, DC, is devoted to civil service operations and non-military populations providing government services. 

So you have two Municipal Corporations organized for two different purposes and two different classes of "citizens" that are attached to the two different Municipal Corporations. Additionally, each of these Municipal Corporations are operated as franchises by different foreign governments.

The British Territorial United States Government and its U.S. Citizens attached to the United States of America, Incorporated, are engaged in military concerns and operations as a "community" within the District of Columbia. 

The Municipal Government of Washington, DC, was originally chartered by the Continental Congress as the City of Washington, DC, and functioned under the direction of the American Federal Congress until 1860; it has since been run as a for-profit Municipal Corporation operated by the City of Rome, and its "citizens of the United States" are all the Federal Civil Service and Agency personnel, plus their dependents.

So while the District Government and the Municipal Government are separate and are run by separate parent corporations and have fundamentally different purposes and personnel, both are organized as Municipal Corporations. 

The word "Municipal" is an adjective describing what kind of "Corporation" we are referring to.  

This is the best, simplest definition of "municipality" that I have run across: 

"The definition of a municipality is a community with a local government and specified boundaries. This includes towns, cities, or villages. These areas are formally organized by the larger state where they are located. They are given the authority to have their own laws and standards, as long as they are in line with the state's laws as well."

The definition demonstrates that we could call any organized local government a municipality, but in practice, the State of State organizations which have been busily defining "municipalities" always incorporate them as franchises of their own business organization and it is this enfranchisement that enforces loyalty to the parent corporation. 

Thus, a municipality owes fealty to the corporation that creates it or the sovereign that charters it, even though it is technically organized and operated by the local people. 

Now step back a moment and look at the world around you.  Do you have any reason to suppose that a Municipal Corporation in Japan is different in character or purpose than a Municipal Corporation in Venezuela? 

How about a C-Corp that sells shares and trades on stock exchanges -- is Mitsubishi, Inc. fundamentally different in structure or purpose than Ford Motor Company, Inc.? 

The answer in both cases is, no, they are the same....all over the world, wherever you look, the various kinds of corporations that people use to organize their businesses and even their philanthropic activities are standardized.  

A trust is a trust in China, just as it is a trust in Belgium. A foundation in Germany has the same characteristics as a foundation in South Africa. 

This is because all of these business models have been defined and developed under the care and guidance of the Roman Curia. They are the same on a global basis because the Jurisdiction of the Air to which these Legal Fictions belong is global in nature.  

At the end of the day, all these various entities belong to the Pope and are administered under Ecclesiastical Law. 

The fact that this vast plethora of corporations ultimately belong to the Pope and that he has the sovereign right and responsibility to oversee their operations always comes as a shock, but there it is. 

Who rules the Jurisdiction of the Air?  The Pope. 

A network of treaties makes this possible in a practical sense with the Treaties of Ghent and the Treaties of Utrecht being the principal agreements involved. 

No chartered thing is sovereign.  No incorporated thing is sovereign. 

And when incorporated entities -- Municipal Corporations, for example -- function as governments, those governments are not sovereign, either. 

So it boils down to which sovereign power (Principal) are these Municipal Corporations standing under?  Ultimately, they are all standing under the Pope, by definition. 

Our nation-states are unincorporated and sovereign entities.  Their States, by which they carry on international and global business, are also sovereign and unincorporated entities in those venues.  

The States' unincorporated  Federation of States, doing business as The United States of America since 1776, is not itself a sovereign entity, but acts as an agent or instrumentality of the sovereign States to conduct mutually beneficial business in international and global jurisdictions. 

Our nation-states are the sovereign powers that our American Government stands under, and their States operating individually or severally as the case may be, are the sovereign powers that we, Americans, stand under in international and global jurisdictions. 

Thus, when it comes to the ultimate administration and ownership of Municipal Corporations run amok, we, acting on behalf of the American Principals, that is, our States --- bypass the operators, the British Crown and the City of Rome, respectively, and go directly to the Pope. 

People who are used to thinking of the Office of the Pope in terms of his sacred offices and administration of the Roman Catholic Church miss the point. He is also by far the wealthiest man on Earth and the busiest business executive. All incorporated entities belong to him and are subject to him, whether he takes an interest in their day-to-day administration or not. 

His right and his responsibility to liquidate corporations that engage in unlawful activities is ironclad, fully and clearly stated in Ecclesiastical Law, and implemented by contracts and treaties.  

Thus, when we have exhausted our remedies and grow tired of bad behavior on the part of incorporated entities, especially entities created as franchises of foreign Municipal Corporations,  it's time to take it up with the Pope and with the Vatican Chancery Court, which decides issues of ownership.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

In the Public Interest -- Establishing a Bridgehead

 By Anna Von Reitz

We all begin life taking baby steps and eventually grow from there. 

Why should we expect to be able to instantly navigate the considerable complexity of our traditional government, and command all the power inherent in it?  

That's not possible, and our Assemblies need to be patient as members learn and as the organizational pieces come together.  

We are organized now to come together peacefully and lawfully to press our claims internationally and globally, and to enforce our Law of the Land and our local law, too.  

It's a big job, but self-governance demands it.  

So, let's choose something with universal benefit that is relatively easy to win and enforce: removal of fluoride and other dangerous chemicals from public water supplies. 

These are, after all, bureaucrats who are adding these poisons to the water and paying for this, mostly under the misapprehension that they are doing something good. 

Getting them to not do something is easier than getting them to do something. Always. 

Thanks to the fact that the addition of fluoride to drinking water has been outlawed in Europe for decades and that literally tons of information about the ill-effects of this practice are readily available online and in libraries, it is easy to draw up a list of maybe twenty facts to prove that any benefit of fluoridation is overwhelmed by the health risks and harms associated with it. 

Lately, many Municipalities have been adding Chlorine to public drinking water supplies, too.  Time to research that, also.  

Fluorine and Chlorine are closely related and are commonly used to kill germs and algae in swimming pools and other environments, but other materials, like Biotin, have been proven just as effective or more effective at killing germs and removing all sorts of pollutants without side effects. 

Water is fundamentally important to health, for people and for birds and animals, too.  

So if  you want to get your "land legs" under your Assemblies in terms of taking appropriate political action without transgression, consider researching the issues and pressing hard for clean safe water in your State of the Union.  

The steps are: 

(1) Investigate the issues, the pros and cons of Fluoridation.

(2) Prepare a simple one-page presentation of facts everyone needs to know. Spread it around.  Garner support.

(3) Find out who or what agency is responsible for putting Fluoride in your water. 

(4) Get on the agenda and prepare to speak to them. Give them your one-pager. 

(5) Make your presentation "on and for" the record, using your own videotaping and recording resources. 

(6) Bring as many people to the meeting in support as possible. Numbers amount to a show of force in bureaucratic terms, so get revved up and make sure everyone understands what you are doing and is committed to show up and sound off.

(7) Engage all your networks, family, friends, churches, schools, everyone who will benefit from knowing the truth about Fluoride and getting it out of their water supply. 

(8) Offer alternatives.  Not only are people more likely to not do something, that is, stop doing something rather than get motivated to do it, but they like it when you give them viable alternatives. If not Fluoride, is there something truly beneficial, like biotin, that can be added to the water purification process in your State?  

(9) Prepare yourselves to go back a second or even third time. 

And remember that this is how all these Special Interests like "Black Lives Matter"and the LGBTYQ-ites and other groups have gotten so much attention for their special little agendas. 

By choosing an issue that impacts everyone, you can galvanize the General Public -- the so-called Silent Majority, and make friends.

This is public service and great practice for the Assemblies. You gain familiarity and credibility by taking such action as a group.  And you dispel fear of the unknown the more positive community action and outreach you sponsor. 

The only actual and proper job of government is to protect people and their property.  So choose your turf wisely and start doing the job. 

Remember that most of the bureaucrats and elected officials you encounter who are acting as British Territorial U.S. Citizens or Municipal citizens of the United States, are clueless. 

It's up to you all to take the lead and educate them.  Don't talk them to death or bury them under reams of paper.  Just gently soundbite-at-a-time educate them and show them the job that they should be doing. 

The key to self-governance is to govern. Governing in our system means protecting yourself and others, and, secondarily, protecting your property and the property of others. 

Your public water supplies are among your most precious property assets.  

If your assembly accomplished nothing more as a group than continuing to organize yourselves this year, that's fine, but the payoff comes when you start acting as a group and educating and motivating others to take action in the Public Interest. 

That is, your interest.  

We become by doing.  We learn by teaching.  We learn to protect ourselves through study and effort, and when we teach others to protect themselves, we become empowered to protect each other. 

This is just as important for our public employees as it is for us. They, too, are benefited by doing the right thing.  

After all, nobody likes drinking water that smells bad.  Nobody enjoys walking out of a shower that makes your hair dry and brittle.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg so far as fluoridation is concerned. 

Cooperative self-governance can be achieved, one step at a time. One project at a time.  One issue at a time.  

For our assemblies, it's time to look around at the world and pick a place to start. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

The Treaty and Contract Fraud

 By Anna Von Reitz

Information provided to H.E. Cardinal Mamberti and the Vatican Chancery Court regarding our Claim March 6 2005, January 19 2023 in seq: 

The proliferation of incorporated entities has been allowed under treaty, most specifically the Ghent and Utrecht Treaty Series, which our government signed in good faith.  

At no time did we agree to be ruled over by paper entities created by our own hands or anyone else's; any supposition otherwise requires overturning the Maxims of Law and the Order of Creation, which strictly and absolutely requires that no creation is greater than its creator.  

Failure to observe and honor this truth, that the creator is always greater than the creation,  is blasphemy of the highest order,  and conforms within the hierarchy of Original Sin as Cause for Action under Ecclesiastical Law. 

This foundational principle of law, that the creator is always greater than the creation,  and both the aforementioned Treaty Series governing the creation and ownership and administration of corporations, have been undermined by foreign Territorial and Municipal Corporations merely tasked to provide enumerated government services exercised under our delegated powers.  

The context and nature of our Constitutional Agreements are not in question.  As the international and lawful government representing the State Citizens who are Parties to these venerable Constitutions, we are calling upon the other Principals to bring their Agents and Subcontractors into compliance with both their trust obligations and their contractual service obligations. 

The British Territorial Subcontractor has not been in honor since 1860. 

The direct Municipal Subcontractor has not been in honor since 1878. 

In the absence of honor, good faith is not in evidence, either. 

This has led to our Military Services being unlawfully converted into private mercenary services under the control of a foreign government, being paid for with our money by a foreign Paymaster.  

It has also led to our military service personnel being duped into serving as cheap mercenaries while earnestly believing -- and being misled to believe -- that they are defending our country and fighting for freedom. 

This misuse and abuse of our military has led in turn to endless war-for-profit schemes and incursions by -- what appears to be our military, but which is in fact a foreign mercenary service --  into other countries and interference in their internal affairs.  

This unlawful war profiteering by the Municipal Corporation Subcontractors inhabiting the District of Columbia has led people around the world to hate "the Americans" when in fact the Americans and their resources are being commandeered and misdirected to perform illegal and unlawful acts at the behest of foreign commercial and political interests--- most especially the banks and the political organizations responsible for funding and misdirecting -- respectively, what is supposed to be our dedicated military service, not a foreign mercenary service. 

This breach of trust and contract has also led to the personage schemes which have been used to unlawfully convert American persons via undisclosed and non-consensual registrations, all serving to redefine Americans as foreign citizenry, so as to promote illegal and unlawful taxation and illegal and unlawful confiscation of American public and private property----and all without disclosure. 

All "secret" and all "national security" issues, but whose "nation" would be endangered if the General Public of this country knew the truth about all this fraud and violence and skullduggery?  Not ours. 

These same breaches of trust have also led to the existence of foreign and unauthorized courts operating on our shores.  There is, for example, no provision anywhere allowing for the existence of a probate court in this country, no provision establishing Military District Courts---especially in the absence of an actual military, and no provision for a Municipal Tax Court to operate within the States of the Union.  

These aforementioned breaches of trust and service contract have been purposeful, self-interested, and long-term.  These breaches of trust have been misaddressed against our lawful civilian government and our people under the False Pretenses provided by an undeclared and illegal Mercenary Conflict, and these False Pretenses of "war" have then resulted in False Claims in Commerce and other venues ever since the 1860's. 

The failure of the other Principals and their Subcontractors to recognize and credit the contributions of our people has led to the appearance of a huge "National Debt" on the part of the Perpetrators, which has not been offset by the value of the actual goods and services received -- and that has allowed the collection of unowed interest on this mammoth non-existent debt.  This accounting sleight of hand and cyclic bankruptcy fraud have been combined to fraudulently off-load vast amounts of foreign debt on the American People. 

We have been charged for the cost of all the operational expenses of these foreign Municipal Corporation Subcontractors plus their franchises acting as governmental service providers in other countries--- which is clearly not contemplated nor allowed by any of the Federal Constitutions. 

Recent narratives spun by various so-called "intelligence" organizations, including DHS, the CIA, and the FBI, which are all owned and operated as private government subcontractors and/or franchises of the same run amok Municipal Corporation Subcontractors, would have us believe that we are in the grip of some ancient evil and in a sense, we are under seige by the Father of All Lies. 

These aforementioned phony accounting and banking practices are also breaches of trust -- fiduciary trust -- and they are also obviously self-interested acts of fraud leading to unjust enrichment for the Perpetrators and enslavement of the Victims.  

Substituting "Federal Reserve Notes" --- that is, I.O.U.s / Promissory Notes issued by private banks --- for United States Silver Dollars and silver bullion, forcing people to use private bank scrip as legal tender under color of law, confiscating 20,000 tons of privately held American gold and investing it in the World Bank and Federal Reserve Banks and IBRD, crediting the seigniorage we had to underwrite to foreign trustees, the ubiquitous use of Bar Association Members to act as Executors de Son Tort administering foreign shelf corporations named after us--- an entire litany of unlawful and illegal acts perpetrated against us by foreign Principals that owe us good faith and service under contract, must now be reversed.  

We wish for the return of our physical property assets unencumbered and unharmed. 

We wish for the return of our credit assets unencumbered and unharmed. 

We wish for the return of our military service to lawful status. 

We wish for the return of all our land records, land grants, cadastral surveys, patents, township records, all foreign titles, roads, road and utility easements, utility corridors, railroad right-of-ways, public infrastructure, free trade zones, government buildings and facilities, and custodial service records, as well as personnel and personnel records needed to provide continuance of service. 

We wish for the return of all for-hire police forces to lawful status as peacekeepers acting under our direction. 

We wish for the return of all American Legacy Trust and Historical Trust Assets to our lawful American Government and the people that these assets belong to.  

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                  The United States of America

                   In care of: Box 520994

                   Big Lake, Alaska 99652

June 9th 2023

We wish for the forfeiture of these corporations that have acted under color of law and benefited themselves from these criminal acts of fraud and breach of trust and contract.

We wish for the return of all personnel and equipment and facilities to our control and direction. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

The Biowarfare Fraud

 By Anna Von Reitz

Information provided to H.E. Cardinal Mamberti and the Vatican Chancery Court regarding our Claim March 6 2005, January 19 2023 in seq: 

Our research has confirmed, as has the research of Dr. David Martin recently delivered to the European Parliament, that the so-called Covid 19 Bioweapon was developed and based on research and patents that began in Great Britain, migrated to the United States, and was then further migrated to China.  

The progenitor in Great Britain was the Pirbright Institute, the legacy of Rothschild scion Henry de Worms, Lord Pirbright, the very same source of: (1) for-profit corporations substituting themselves for governments; (2) concentration camps; (3) non-consensual and undisclosed medical experimentation, especially vaccine experimentation.  

All of these evils were first made manifest in Africa during the Boer Wars. 

This one man, "Lord Pirbright", and the institution he funded, has been the primary source of all this evil for the past 140 years.  We have blamed the Nazis, but in fact, these evils had their genesis in England and continue to spread from this potent source. 

Despite being outlawed and suppressed, it turns out that the United States (British Territorial) Government has been dabbling in biowarfare, as has the British Government and its Agencies and Affiliates, on a continuous basis ever since the experiments that Lord Pirbright and his friends Cecil Rhodes and the American Mengele, Henry Wellcome (Wellcome Trust), conducted on Dutch prisoners held in concentration camps during the Boer Wars approximately seventy years before Hitler took power.  

We note that at about the same time that these genocides were occurring in Africa, American Indians entrapped on so-called "Reservations" --- open air internment camps --- were being given gifts of warm blankets laced with Smallpox by the U.S. Government, that is, the British Territorial United States Government.  

Beyond our present plight, here's an example of it in continuum: 

  "And there was the matter of germ warfare. The Chinese devoted a great deal of effort to publicizing their claim that the United States, particularly during January to March 1952, had dropped quantities of bacteria and bacteria-laden insects over Korea and northeast China.      It presented testimony of about 38 captured American airmen who had purportedly flown the planes with the deadly cargo. Many of the men went into voluminous detail about the entire operation: the kinds of bombs and other containers dropped, the types of insects, the diseases they carried, etc. At the same time, photographs of the alleged germ bombs and insects were published. 

     Then, in August, an "International Scientific Committee" was appointed, composed of scientists from Sweden, France, Great Britain, Italy, Brazil and the Soviet Union. After an investigation in China of more than two months, the committee produced a report of some 600 pages, many photos, and the conclusion that: The peoples of Korea and China have indeed been the objectives of bacteriological weapons. 

     These have been employed by units of the U.S.A. armed forces, using a great variety of different methods for the purpose, some of which seem to be developments of those applied by the Japanese during the second world war.  

     The last reference has to do with the bacteriological warfare experiments the Japanese had carried out against China between 1940 and 1942. The Japanese scientists responsible for this program were captured by the United States in 1945 and given immunity from prosecution in return for providing technical information about the experiments to American scientists from the Army biological research center at Fort Detrick, Maryland.     

      

    The Chinese were aware of this at the time of the International Scientific Committee's investigation. 

      It should be noted that some of the American airmen's statements contained so much technical biological information and were so full of communist rhetoric— "imperialist, capitalist Wall Street warmonger" and the like—that their personal authorship of the statements must be seriously questioned. Moreover, it was later learned that most of the airmen had confessed only after being subjected to physical abuse.

     But in view of what we have since learned about American involvement with chemical and biological weapons, the Chinese claims cannot be dismissed out of hand. In 1970, for example, the New York Times reported that during the Korean War, when US forces were overwhelmed by "human waves of Chinese, "the Army dug into captured Nazi chemical warfare documents describing Sarin, a nerve gas so lethal that a few pounds could kill thousands of people in minutes.

     By the mid-nineteen-fifties, the Army was manufacturing thousands of gallons of Sarin."  And during the 1950s and 1960s, the Army and the CIA conducted numerous experiments with biological agents within the United States. To cite just two examples: In 1955, there is compelling evidence that the CIA released whooping-cough bacteria into the open air in Florida, followed by an extremely sharp increase in the incidence of the disease in the state that year. The following year, another toxic substance was disseminated in the streets and tunnels of New York City. We will also see in the chapter on Cuba how the CIA conducted chemical and biological warfare against Fidel Castro's rule."

https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/13/130AEF1531746AAD6AC03EF59F91E1A1_Killing_Hope_Blum_William.pdf

It is apparent in all these examples that, both by deceitful means attempting to make people volunteer their own deaths or the deaths of others (legalized abortions, the One Child Rule in China, mandated experimental "vaccines") or by force, taking advantage of prisoners and inmates and detainees in "reservation" facilities, bacteriological and other forms of bioweaponry have been promoted and repeatedly applied by the same monsters: Britain and its puppet government Raj in America, the USA, Inc.  

From our presentation and discussion and timeline provided within our claims process set before the Vatican Chancery Court and prosecuted under Ecclesiastical Law, it is apparent that: (1) the Sars-2 based Covid 19 bioweapon has been under development in Britain and The United States since 1965; (2) the Covid 19 bioweapon derives from patents owned by the Pirbright Institute which has its genesis with the Rothschild heir, Henry de Worms, who pioneered and funded these same evils in Africa more than a hundred years ago; (3) all the evils promoted by Henry de Worms, aka, Lord Pirbright, have continued unabated and have had their most recent

expression as the pre-planned experiment on the General Population known as the Covid 19 Pandemic. 

There is a simple and expedient means to bring an end to all of it. 

Liquidate the Pirbright Institute, the Wellcome Trust, the US, Inc. in all its current forms, the USA, Inc. in all its current forms, the UN, Inc., in all its current forms, the NIH, Inc. (National Institutes of Health), the CDC, Inc. (Centers for Disease Control), the FDA, Inc. (Food and Drug Administration), Microsoft, Inc. (inventor of the Microdot technology used to program the weapon), the CIA, Inc., Pfizer, Bayer, Monsanto, Moderna, Astrazeneca, and Johnson and Johnson, Inc., for production and deployment of biological and environmental poisons and other  unlawful activities that have resulted in millions of injuries and deaths.  

These guilty corporations have continued their activities despite multiple public and international laws prohibiting the use of biological weapons and despite moratoriums on biological weapons research. They have evaded the actual law and lied about it and promoted fraud, murder, maiming, and mayhem against the Public Interest throughout these activities. 

During the recent and ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, it has become apparent that NATO Corporation affiliates representing the US and multiple European countries that are still occupied since World War II, have evaded International Law and the Moratoriums, to carry on biological weapons research and production in Ukraine. 

This was expedited by the murder of the elected Ukrainian Government in 2014 and its replacement by a Territorial Corporation which has endangered the lives and ruined the peace of the Ukrainian people and threatened billions of lives.  We therefore call for the immediate liquidation of UKRAINE, Inc. 

We recommend that the assets of these offending organizations be forfeited to us, the actual government of The United States of America, to be managed for the benefit and health of humanity. We regard protection of people and their assets as the only rightful job of government and that is why we are here today.   

Under Ecclesiastical Law, it is the Pope's right and responsibility to liquidate corporations engaged in unlawful activities and it is the Vatican Chancery Court's business to dispose of the assets.  

We urge the Pope and the Vatican Chancery Court to exercise these rights and responsibilities in favor of the living people of this planet and in favor of their lawful governments. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                  In care of: Box 520994

                  Big Lake, Alaska 99652

June 9th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.