Public International Alert for State Assemblies

 By Anna Von Reitz

The unpleasant truth is that the Civil War was never ended by any peace process, so the Northern Army simply settled in and occupied our country. 

You can look all day for many days on end, and all you will find are the documents surrendering Lee's Army, and three public proclamations (establishing a contract) by President Andrew Johnson declaring "peace on the land".  

You can see that the Army of Occupation and later Presidents didn't honor that contract. 

What then transpired was a roll call of evils, most of which required the Army of Occupation to impersonate us -- that is, to pretend to be us, in order to control us.  

They substituted British Territorial State-of-State organizations for our American State-of-State businesses.  

They substituted their military districts for our counties and held "District Assemblies" from then until now.  

They substituted their corporation elections for our public elections. 

The British Government took full advantage of this situation and has worked under a Cloak of Secrecy about this ever since. 

So how did the British Camel get its nose into our tent again?  

They were never far away.  After the Revolution, as part of the peace process, they obtained certain concessions.  Brits were allowed to stay in this country and keep their private property under the terms of The Residence Act.  

The British Territorial Government got juicy contracts to provide governmental services, especially military services. 

The British King remained our Trustee on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. 

This same British Territorial Government headquartered in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (look it up if you don't believe me) fought with the Northern States-of-States in the Civil War, and took over owing to the bankruptcy of those organizations in 1863. 

So now, instead of an American controlled Army of Occupation, we've had to contend with a British Territorial Army of Occupation. 

It has been this way ever since.  

This is how "President" George Herbert Walker Bush and Henry Kissinger and General Colin Powell could all accept an office and titles and emoluments from a foreign government and serve as Knights of Her Royal Highness Elizabeth II.  

We do have the possibility of up-ending all this by restoring and Reconstructing our American Government, but only if we hold tight, know what is going on, and remember who we are and how things are supposed to work. 

As the only lawful Civilian Government of this country, the U.S. Army is supposed to answer to us, not to the British Monarch and not to their own whim.  

They are supposed to protect us and not interfere in our government--- but the fact is that they don't want to give up control and they are interfering. 

They want to continue their illegal and immoral occupation of our country and they want to continue to treat us, their Employers, as a "conquered people".  

If so, we are only conquered by our own ignorance.

Right now, we have the British Territorial Army personnel known as U.S. Citizens hard at work trying to commandeer our fledgling American State Assemblies, coming through our doors, pretending to be us, with the express object of taking control of our Assemblies.  

All of a sudden, we have these guys from their "National Assembly" organization,  horning in and spreading vicious rumors about me personally and pretending to join our Assemblies in good faith.  

It's another British Substitution Scheme.  

The same process they employed to substitute their States-of-States for ours and to set up and run their District Assemblies as if they were our State Assemblies is being employed to try to take over our State Assemblies.  

So now, I am instructing all the State Assemblies to close their doors to non-member participation and to watch their membership roles carefully. Non-members can observe, but not take part in floor discussions or votes of any kind.  

There is little doubt that these embedded enemies of our country have already infiltrated our organizations to some extent, in order to observe our operations. 

In addition to British Sleeper Cells trying to commandeer what we've built, we have British Territorial organizations in open competition in a few States.  

In Oregon, we have Ron Vrooman's group, calling itself the Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly, and pretending to be an American Jural Assembly.  

We know that isn't true, because American Jural Assemblies are drawn from the General Assembly membership of our State Assemblies.  They don't exist as "independent" vigilante groups like Ron's. 

In Missouri, we've had an unfortunate incident in which the Coordinator was seduced into this same idea that The Missouri Assembly was functioning as a Jural Assembly and not a General Assembly.  Only a handful of The Missouri Assembly members were properly papered up, and when the Recording Secretaries discovered this, they were castigated for demanding correction.  

What is absolutely crucial at this juncture is for Americans to have a firm sense of who they are and know the warning signs. 

The Impersonators will seem very similar to us. They will use deceptively similar terms.  

For example, they will talk about "the Common Law" by which they will mean Military Common Law, not American Common Law. 

In the same spirit, they will talk about "Grand Juries" but they will be talking about Grand Juries of U.S. Citizens convened as Military Tribunals of the District Government, not Grand Juries convened by the people of this country. 

They will talk a great deal about "the Constitution" by which they will mean The Constitution of the United States of America --- their own Territorial Constitution which is their meal ticket.  

They will play upon the common indoctrination and embrace and express the idea that Americans live under "the" Constitution, but in fact, only Public Employees live under any Constitution.  

It's their job to obey the limits of the Federal Constitutions and it's our job to enforce the limits of the Constitutions --- there's a difference involved. 

They are acting as Employees and viewing their Constitution as their employment contract; we are acting as Employers, and demanding that they obey the terms of their service contract. 

They will also talk about "democracy" and promote democratic ideas, like "majority rule", even to the point of allowing majorities to infringe on the most basic rights of individuals.  

They don't understand that our American Government is not and never has been a democracy.  

These interlopers can appear to be very patriotic and pro-American, but in fact, they are confused about what American is.  They were never taught. 

And they don't want to learn. 

They just want to continue bulling their way through life with the assumptions they were given in Public School.  

They have a mentality of willful ignorance. 

Somehow, somewhere, I must hope that I have gotten my message through to enough thinking Americans so that you can sort things out for yourselves.  

1. We are being occupied by a British Territorial-controlled U.S. Army staffed by U.S. Citizens. 

2. These U.S. Citizens think that they are acting as Americans when they are not. 

3. So our country is under occupation by what merely appears to be our own military and is in fact a British Territorial Expeditionary Force. 

4. These U.S. Citizens are coming into our State Assemblies with malice aforethought to commandeer them. 

5. This is part of a command and control strategy using substitution schemes that has been in place ever since the Civil War. 

6. They have substituted their States-of-States for ours, their incorporated "Counties of"  for our Counties, their District Assemblies for our State Assemblies, and now they are trying to commandeer our operations again by substituting their U.S. Citizens as members of our State Assemblies.  

7. All State Assemblies are hereby alerted and advised to close their doors to this kind of interference and infiltration.  

U.S. Citizens must be allowed to record their birthright political status, but as long as they work for or identify with the Federal Government (military or civil service) they cannot be allowed to disrupt our State Assemblies. 

This is because they have a built-in conflict of interest and allegiance to a foreign government. 

Licensed professionals have a similar built-in conflict of interest and are subject to coercion from the King's Government. 

A word to the wise should be sufficient. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Derek Johnson - Did Trump & The Military Put Together A 7 Year Plan?, Is The Plan Operational?

https://rumble.com/v33587k-derek-johnson-trump-and-the-military-put-together-a-7-year-plan-the-plan-is.html

Tenth Sunday After Pentecost

Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's

The Church's Year

 At the Introit of the Mass pray with the Church for God's help to guard us against our enemies:

INTROIT When I cried to the Lord, he heard my voice, from them that draw near to me, and he humbled them, who is before all ages, and remains forever. Cast thy care upon the Lord, and he shall sustain thee. (Ps. LIV.) Hear, O God, my prayer, and despise not my supplication; be attentive to me, and hear me. Glory be to the Father and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.

COLLECT O God, who dost manifest Thine almighty. power above all in showing pardon and pity: multiply upon us Thy mercy, that we running forward to the attainment of Thy promises, may be made partakers of Thy heavenly treasures. Through our Lord Jesus Christ Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee, in the Unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end, Amen.

EPISTLE (I Cor. XII. 2-11 .) Brethren, You know that when you were heathens; you went to dumb idols according as, you were led. Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man, speaking by the Spirit of God, saith. Anathema to Jesus. And no man can say: the Lord Jesus, but by the Holy Ghost. Now there are diversities of graces, but the same Spirit; and there are diversities of ministries, but the same Lord. And there are diversities of operations, but the same God, who worketh all in all. And the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man unto profit. To one, indeed, by the Spirit, is given the word of wisdom: and to another, the word of knowledge, according to the same Spirit: to another, faith in one Spirit: to another, the working of miracles: to another, prophecy: to another, the discerning, of spirits: to another, divers kinds of tongues: to another, of speeches. But all these things one and the same Spirit worketh, dividing to every one according as he will.

EXPLANATION The apostle here reminds the Corinthians of the great grace they received from God in their conversion, and urges them to be grateful for it; for while heathens, they cursed Jesus, but being now brought to the knowledge of the Spirit of God, they possess Christ as their Lord and Redeemer who can be known and professed only by the enlightenment of the Holy , Ghost. The holy Spirit works in different ways, conferring His graces on whom He wills; to one He gives wisdom to understand the great truths of Christianity; to another the gift of healing the sick; to another the gift of miracles and of prophecy; to another the gift of discerning spirits, to know if one is governed by the Spirit of God, or of the world, Satan and the flesh; to another the gift of tongues. The extraordinary gifts, namely, those of working miracles, and of prophesying &c. became rarer as the faith spread, whereas the gifts which sanctify man will always remain the same.,

[See Instruction on the gifts of the Holy Ghosts Pentecost.]

GOSPEL (Luke XDII. 9-14.) At that time, Jesus spoke this parable to some who trusted in themselves as just, and despised others. Two men went up into the Temple to pray: the one a Pharisee, and the other a Publican. The Pharisee standing, prayed thus with himself: O God, I give thee thanks that I am not as the rest of men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, as also is this Publican. I fast twice in the week; I give tithes of all that I possess. And the Publican standing afar off, would not so much as lift up his eyes towards heaven, but struck his breast, saying: O God, be merciful to me a sinner. I say to you: this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: because every one that exalteth himself shall be humbled, and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.

Why did Christ make use of' this parable of the Pharisee and the Publican?

To teach us never proudly to condemn or despise a man, even though he should appear impious, for we may be deceived like the Pharisee who despised the Publican, whom he considered a great sinner, while, in reality, the man was justified before God on account of his repentant spirit.

What should we do before entering a Church?

We should reflect that we are going into the house of God, should therefore think what we are about to say to Him, and what we wish to ask of Him. That we may make ourselves less unworthy to be heard, we should humble ourselves as did Abraham, (Gen. XVIII. 27.) remembering that we are dust and ashes, and on account of our sins unworthy o appear before the eyes of God, much less to address Him , for He listens to the prayers of the humble only, (Ps. CI, 18.) and gives them His grace, while He resists the proud. (James IV. 6.)

Was the Pharisee's prayer acceptable to God?

No, for it was no prayer, but boasting and ostentation; he praised himself, and enumerated his apparent good works. But in despising others and judging them rashly he sinned grievously instead of meriting God's grace.

Was the Publican's prayer acceptable to God?

Yes, for though short, it was humble and contrite. He stood afar off, as if to acknowledge himself unworthy of the presence of God and intercourse with men. He stood with downcast eyes, thus showing that he considered himself because of his sins unworthy to look towards heaven, even confessed himself a sinner, and struck his breast to punish, as St. Augustine says, the sins which he had committed in his heart: This is why we strike our breast at certain times during Mass, for by this we acknowledge ourselves miserable sinners, and that we are sorry for our sins.

ON PRIDE AND VAIN GLORY

We should learn from this gospel that God looks upon the humble and exalts them, but is far from the proud. (Ps. CXXXVII. 6.) The Pharisee went to the temple entirely wrapt up in himself, and the good works which he thought he had performed, but returned empty and hated by God; the Publican, on the contrary, appearing before God as a public but penitent sinner, returned justified. Truly,. an humble sinner is better in the sight of God than a proud just man!

He who glories in his own good works, or performs them to please men, or to win their praise, loses his merit in the eyes of the most High, for Christ says: Take heed that you do not your justice before men, to be seen by them: otherwise you shall not have a reward of your Father who is in heaven. (Matt. VI. 1.)

In order that we may learn to despise vain glory, these doctrines should be well borne in mind. We should consider that it will happen to those who seek after vain glory, as to the man who, made many toilsome journeys on land and sea in order to accumulate wealth, and had no sooner acquired it than he was shipwrecked, and lost all. Thus the ambitious man avariciously seeking glory and honor will find, when dying, that the merit which he might have had for his good works, is now lost to him, because he did not labor for the honor of God. To prevent such an evil, strive at the commencement of every good work which you undertake, to turn your heart to God by a good intention.

But that you may plainly recognize this vice, which generally keeps itself concealed, and that you may avoid it, know that pride is an inordinate love of ostentation, and an immoderate desire to surpass others in honor and praise. The proud man goes beyond himself, so to speak, makes far more of himself than he really is, and, like the Pharisee, despises others; the humble man, on the contrary, has a low estimate of himself, looks upon himself as nothing and, like the Publican, despises no one but himself, and thus is pleasing in the sight of God.

ASPIRATION O God, who hearest the prayers of the humble, but dost resist the proud, I earnestly beseech Thee to give me an humble heart, that I may imitate, the humility of Thy only begotten Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, and thereby merit to be exalted with Him in heaven.

INSTRUCTION ON GRACE

In the epistle of this day the Apostle St. Paul speaks of the different gifts of the Holy Ghost which He distributes as He pleases. These extraordinary graces which the apostle mentions, are not necessary for salvation. But the Church teaches, that the grace of the Holy Ghost is
necessary for salvation, because without it we could neither properly believe, nor faithfully observe the commandments of God. For the holy religion of Jesus teaches, and experience confirms, that since the fall of our first parents we are weak and miserable, and of ourselves, and by our own strength, we cannot know or perform the good necessary for our salvation. We need a higher aid, a higher, assistance, and this assistance is called grace.

What, then, is grace?

Grace is an inward, supernatural gift which God through finite goodness, and in consideration of Christ's merits, ants us to enable us to work out our salvation.

Grace is a gift, that is, a present, a favor, a benefit. t is an inward and supernatural gift; an inward gift, Because it is bestowed upon man's soul to distinguish it tom external gifts and benefits of God, such as: food, clothing, health; grace is a supernatural gift, because it is above nature. In creating our souls God gives us a certain degree of light which enables us to think, reflect, judge, to acquire more or less knowledge: this is called natural light. In the same way He gives our souls the power in some measure to overcome sensual, vicious inclinations; this power is called natural power (virtue). To this natural light and power must be added a higher light and a higher power, if 'man would be sanctified and saved. This higher light and higher power is grace. It is, therefore, called a supernatural gift, because it surpasses the natural power of man, and produces in his understanding and in his will wholesome effects, which he could not produce without it. For example, divine faith, divine love is a supernatural gift or grace of God, because man of his own power could never receive as certain God's revelations and His incomprehensible mysteries with so great a joy and so firm a conviction, and could never love God above all things and for His own sake, unless God assisted him by His grace.

God grants us grace also through pure benevolence without our assistance, without our having any right to it; He grants it without cost, and to whom He pleases; but He gives it in consideration of the infinite merits of Christ Jesus, in consideration of Christ's death on the cross, and of the infinite price of our redemption. Finally, grace is a gift of God, by which to work out our salvation, ,that is, it is only by the grace of God that we can perform meritorious works which aid us in reaching heaven. Without grace it is impossible for us to perform any good action, even to have a good thought by which to gain heaven.

From this it follows that with the grace of God we can accomplish all things necessary for our salvation, fulfil all the commandments of God, but without it we can do nothing meritorious. God gives His grace to all, and if the wicked perish, it is because they do not cooperate with its divine promptings.

How is grace divided?

Into two kinds, actual and sanctifying grace.

Actual grace is God's assistance which we always need to accomplish a good work, to avoid sin which we are in danger of committing, or that grace which urges us on to good, and assists us in accomplishing it; for it is God, says the Apostle Paul, (Phil. II. 13.) who worketh in you both to will and to accomplish. If a good work is to be performed by us, God must enlighten our mind that we may properly know the good and distinguish it from evil; He must rouse our will and urge it on to do the known good and to avoid the evil; He must also uphold our will and increase our strength that what we wish to do, we may really accomplish.

This actual grace is, therefore, necessary for the just, that they may always remain in sanctifying grace, and accomplish good works; it is necessary for the shiner that he may reach the state of sanctifying grace.

What is sanctifying grace?

It is the great benefit which God bestows upon us, when He sanctifies and justifies us; in other words: sanctifying grace is the love of God, given to us by the Holy Ghost, which love dwells in us and whose temple we become, or it is the advent and abiding of God in our hearts, as promised in the words of Jesus: If any one love me he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him, and will make our abode with him. (John XVI. 23.)

He who possesses sanctifying grace, possesses the greatest treasure that a man can have on earth. For what can be more precious than to be beautiful in the sight of God, acceptable to Him, and united with Him! He who possesses this grace, carries within himself the supernatural image of God, he is a child of God, and has a right to the inheritance of heaven.

How is this sanctifying grace lost?

It is lost by every mortal sin, and can only be regained by a complete return to God, by true repentance and amendment. The loss of sanctifying grace is a far greater injury than the loss of all earthly possessions. How, terrible, then, is mortal sin which deprives us of this treasure!

Dear Jack, About the Confederation

 By Anna Von Reitz

How many times do I have to tell you that I don't accept any foreign titles, like "Mrs." or "Mrs. Riezinger" etc.?   My only Proper Person is a Lawful Person, not a Legal Person, and I want no further confusion about that fact. 

A "Confederate State" by definition is a "State of State" and always has been.  A State of State is a business organization that is either (1) owned and operated by a State, or, (2) contracted to provide the services of a State-of-State organization.  

At no time is a "Confederate State"  defined as a true State with physical borders and a living population. 

All "Confederate States" are "inchoate" or "incomplete" States due to their nature as business organizations set apart from the physical State. 

This is why they follow the nomenclature as "State of North Carolina" for example, which literally means "State belonging to or set apart from North Carolina".  

Even those Insular States like Puerto Rico that have land and soil, have not entered Statehood via the Northwest Ordinance, so their "Confederate States" -- for example, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico -- exist only on paper remain a "Possession of the United States". 

If you don't believe me, you are welcome to check the "Definitions" section of the Uniform Commercial Code, older Legal Dictionaries, Banking Dictionaries that cover Commercial jargon, American Jurisprudence (Second Edition), Benedict's Admiralty Law, and even the autobiography of Jefferson Davis and the numerous quotes of Abraham Lincoln concerning the Confederation, all of which serve to clarify exactly what "a" Confederation and a "Confederate State" is, and what the Confederation created by The Articles of Confederation ---- was. 

Your assertion that States of States precede States, and that States derive from states is, as usual, provably and logically wrong. 

The use of the styles: "states", "States", and "STATES" is a Latin style convention.  

Again, I remind you that our official language is English.  But for the sake of the discussion, in Latin, the use of all small letters denotes the superior party, Upper Lower case denotes indentured servitude or public office, and the use of all capitals indicates a slave, a corporation, or a dead man's estate.

With that generalized explanation in place, you are prepared to learn why a "state" in Latin is superior to a "State" and a "State" is superior to a "STATE". 

In the Latin system, the "state" refers to the national soil jurisdiction formed by the contiguous counties in each physically-defined State all joined together, while "State" refers to the international jurisdiction defined by the land underlying the soil and is defined by the physical borders of each State land mass.  

Please note that because it underlies the soil, the land must be present and must be claimed prior to the soil, or the soil has nothing to rest upon.  

So the national jurisdiction of the soil depends on the international jurisdiction of the land, and both are inseparably joined. 

The realm of the States-of-States lies outside physicality in the jurisdiction of the air.  In the Latin system, the STATE is a Confederate State.  

Using English conventions, we just call it the State of North Carolina, Incorporated. 

Even in the days before the so-called Civil War, the unincorporated Confederate State-of-State was called, "The State of North Carolina".  

So when you say, "Confederation" you are talking about a consortium of businesses that are allied together.   

And when you refer to each Confederate State, you are referring to an inchoate, non-physical business that may simply be "corporate" or which may be "incorporated" --- but in any case, is a separate business entity quite apart from any State of the Union. 

So now that we finally know what we are talking about and know that "Confederate States" are not the same as "States" in nature or jurisdiction, we are ready to consider -- who or what was responsible for organizing, running, and overseeing these "Confederate States", that is, businesses providing government services for the States of the Union? 

The Federal Constitution issued in 1787 to the States of America answers that question. 

The original Union States (or in the Latin system, Union states) had been using the business name "States of America" since the 1770's.  The 1787 Federal Constitution refers to this "States of America" as the Subcontractor receiving the service contract. 

So, the original Union (not the Northern faction in the Civil War) operating as the States of America was the recipient of "The Constitution for the united States of America" and was the operator of the Federal Republic and the Union states (Latin nomenclature system) were the owners of the individual Confederate States (State of State businesses). 

Contrary to the idea most people have been given, the "more perfect union" referred to in The Articles of Confederation was obviously the States of America and the original Union of the Union states (Latin nomenclature system). 

The Articles of Confederation were the Articles of Incorporation for the State-of-State (Confederate) businesses belonging to the Union States, so that they, similar to the State Members of the Federation of States, could act together in their mutual self-interest: that is, their "more perfect union". 

When the Confederation broke down for lack of quorum, that entire system broke down. It's been defunct for160 years. 

It can be restored via the Reconstruction but that can only be accomplished by the actual States, not the States of States. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

As Things Stand on August 5th 2023

 By Anna Von Reitz

I talk to people every day who are having a tough time wrapping their heads around the world they are living in.  I sympathize. 

The only lawful government in The United States is represented by the living people standing in their State Assemblies in each State of the Union. 

Neither the British Territorial United States Government operated as a District of Columbia Municipal Corporation nor the City of Rome Municipal Corporation operating the Municipal United States Government have the nature and structure required to function as a lawful government of our nation-states nor our country as a whole. 

All the Principals involved have known this for more than 160 years, so it's not any new news for the Pope or the King or the Lord Mayor. 

25 years ago, my husband and I realized that the IRS was a privateering scam and everything else has unravelled from there. 

We realized that certain bankers and politicians and captains of industry were intent on declaring our entire country to be "vacated" and abandoned property --- ripe for the taking.  

We also realized that the corporations posing as the "government" were foreign subcontractors in the business of providing governmental services. 

It took time to organize a response and prosecute it, but we did the work. In the course of doing all the research and making the efforts involved, we learned that our country wasn't the only victim of this False Claim on Abandonment scheme. 

So we expanded our efforts to safeguard our own country to the other victims of the same con artists. 

As things stand, I set up my Proper Name Trust and recorded it.  I claimed all the major corporations and their debts, worldwide, in favor of the living people. 

So, for example, when I claimed the UNITED STATES, INC., I also claimed their subsidiary franchises, like CHINA, INC. and the UNITED KINGSDOM, INC. and AUSTRALIA, INC. 

What makes my claims unique besides the Due Process I gave them, is that unlike all other claimants, I claimed the debts of these corporations. 

Everyone else was busily trying to avoid claiming these awesome debts, but I claimed them, because I realized that for me and all the other living people, their debts are our credits. 

Claiming their debts puts me -- automatically -- in the absolute Preferential Creditor driver's seat.  All my claims are cured and they are all secured and they are all sitting in my private express trusts and my public Fiduciary Trusts, where they have been automatically cashiered during the entire process. 

So, through me and my Proper Name Trust, which on the statutory side is good for fifty years from the date of origin, all these corporations and all the assets they were holding at the time of my claim, are preserved for the living people of this planet. 

So, for example, whether it's AUSTRALIA, INC. or Australia, Inc., the assets are claimed and held in trust for the living people of Australia. All living people in Australia, aborigine or European, African, or.... whatever. Red blood and hands and feet, blood that flows and flesh that lives.  So are the debts (credits) held in trust.  Both the assets and the credit created from the assets belong to the living people of that country and nobody else.  

Now, it's true that everyone has to shake a leg and get organized and operate their own country's lawful government again, and it's true that may take some doing, but there is no "drop dead" date and no excuse for rumors telling people to meet a 60 day deadline to pull a lawful government out of their hat, or else join a native tribal government. 

We have our lawful government and every other nation impacted by this immense and brutal fraud has a traditional government.  

All the property that was claimed by the British Territorial pirates has come home to me, and as my Irrevocable Will says, all that property must be returned to the living people it belongs to -- not to corporations "representing" them, nor to the administration of tribal councils cohabiting the land with them and certainly no kind of Congress presently in situ.  

Each country has to organize their own lawful national government to inherit the public interest, and they have to get their own political status in order to inherit their private assets. 

They have to overcome their own ignorance and bickering in order to self-govern.   

The public assets get released from my trust(s)  when the living people of each country get organized to operate their own lawful government again, and the private assets go back to each one of the living people as they correct their political status with no predatory public interest claim attached to their private assets. 

Is that clear enough for everyone, everywhere? 

I own your corporations chartered since the 1600's. I own their debts, their franchises, their trusts, their names, their stock, their contracts, bonds, bills, indentures, treaties, and everything else that they have held "for" the living people --- and misused to profit themselves.  

We are irrevocably determined that it all goes back to the living people, not some "representation" of them, but literally given back to them. This is their inheritance and they are responsible for caring for it and passing it on to the next generation. 

We will do whatever is necessary and expend whatever a Prudent Man might reasonably expend to educate and assist and organize the lawful governments, clean up the damage, and support and educate the people to help them through this transition back to sanity.  

It is our intention to retire as soon as possible, to enjoy our well-earned peace, and whatever days are left to us. 

We do not enjoy managing other people's property and firmly believe that everyone needs to learn how to manage themselves and their own affairs. 

This argument about self-governance has gone on for over a thousand years, and as of last night, we won. 

Let us all redouble our efforts and carry through straight to the goal --- which is nothing less than freedom and prosperity and peace for all. 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

New Thread for Oregon Discussion - Part 2 - Banks

 By Anna Von Reitz

Over two years ago I announced the plan for a new banking system, specifically, a "bilateral" banking system that would allow our States of the Union to conduct both trade and commerce independent of the BRICS or SWIFT or QFS. 

This news, and also the news that we would be launching a new asset-backed currency, a gold-backed dollar, was greeted with joy --- in most quarters.  

In due time, everything necessary has been created and synchronized and paid for.  The Assemblies have authorized the creation of a new American currency, the gold-backed American Federation Dollar, the AFD.

Since then, trillions of dollars worth of credit and assets have been recouped that are owed back to the American People, bilateral banks have been chartered and Bank Treaties have been signed, a whole architecture of satellites and computers has been purchased, new programs have been written, and so much more --- to bring us to this day, when our online banks are fully functional, ready to launch.

Bricks and mortar are still to come. The cash form of AFD embedded with threads of gold is still to come, but the vast bulk of the work and the diplomatic efforts and everything else that has gone into this effort has been accomplished. 

We now have our own independent banking system.

We have our own international land recording system. 

We have recouped some of our assets and credit, though there is still a lot more to retrieve. 

We have overcome all legal challenges and diplomatic obstacles and we have done this not only for ourselves, but for living people worldwide who have been robbed and oppressed for generations.

All this has been taking place on a truly global and international scale. 

The principle function of our banks is to create and spread the benefits of prosperity.  We don't even think of them as banks in the common sense, because we will not be enslaving anyone with debt and interest on debt. 

Instead, we will be delivering back prepaid credit that the living people are already owed and allowing customers and vendors to seamlessly conduct business on a global scale. 

Unlike the common corporate structures, we are not limited to a single-minded focus on "profit at any cost".  We are, instead, enabled to use our hearts as well as our heads to embrace all that is truly good for mankind, and are free to count our "profits" by a different standard. 

We are literally opening up the whole world economy and making money and banking services available to everyone, regardless of race, creed, age, sex, religion, nationality, or any other difference.  We are focused on the unity of mankind instead. 

Just stop a moment and take in the mind-boggling immensity of the endeavor and realize that it has nothing whatsoever to do with an ordinary State of California Credit Union. 

Our bilateral bank system is a totally different thing in a totally different jurisdiction and on a totally different scale. 

How there has ever been any "mistaken identity" confusing a Credit Union belonging to a Private Membership Association (PMA) in California for what I am doing with the bilateral banks, is beyond me.  

Even the promoters of the PMA Credit Union knew it had nothing to do with me, which is clearly revealed by their own comments on the Global Family International Trade Bank channel on Mattermost. 

The only discussions I ever had with these PMA members were in the context of preparing to migrate their Credit Union accounts over to the Bilateral Banking System, which is a Lawful Conversion process any credit union can undertake. 

So they knew that I wasn't a PMA member, that I had nothing to do with the PMA Credit Union, and that the PMA Credit Union wasn't linked to the Bilateral Banking System. 

But they told Assembly members that they had to be PMA Members in order to get an account in "my" international trade bank.  

They misrepresented accounts in their own PMA Credit Union as accounts in the Bilateral Banking System -- which they knew wasn't true.

Then, on cue and in sync with the attack on our international Land Recording System (LRS), they started a panic and started a bank run on their own Credit Union. 

And have attempted to blame me for it ever since.

In concert with all this, they were also telling people to go all over the country and start new bank accounts with Federal Reserve banks.  For no apparent reason.  

Well, there was a reason -- the reason was to pump billions of dollars worth of new credit access into those banks.  

So these people are Liars, pure and simple, and Instigators, too, seeking to undermine me and undermine our banks and even undermine the credit union and PMA they were pushing -- all to profit the Federal Reserve. 

That identifies these people as Undeclared Foreign Agents working for the British Territorial Government and the Rothschild Banking Empire headed by the Bank of England. 

They are competitors out to besmirch our efforts and blame me for something they did. 

And curiously, while loudly blaming me, and knowing that they had passed off accounts in the  State of California Credit Union as accounts in "my" bank, they never suggested that their victims could get satisfaction by reporting the circumstance to the State of California Banking Commission.  Why not? 

Because the State of California, Inc., is a Rothschild enterprise and they wouldn't want to hurt their own business. 

Think back to the tactics these people used, how they asked you to do things (join a PMA, take out multiple new accounts in other banks) that made no sense, how they made you feel afraid in an already scary economic environment and pushed the idea that I was involved in what they were selling. 

The bad news is that we suffered an attack. The good news is that we survived it. 

I speak to Hunter several times a week.  He hasn't gone anywhere. He's had to knuckle down to build a replacement International Land Recording System on top of building our global bank system.  

He has done it all as a heart transplant patient. 

These vicious people didn't even have respect for that, for his health, and for his friendship.  

So mark them well. Know what they are and never trust another word they say.   

The actual Oregon Assembly will be resuming meetings. Those who want to follow the peaceful and lawful path, join Tricia.  

Those who want to be traitors to their own country and act as shills for foreign business interests, go cuddle up to King Charles III ---  join your District Assembly. 

The rest of us won't miss you at all.

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Puppet Masters of the Pandemic. Part 1: What Did The CIA Do in Wuhan?"

 https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/puppet-masters-of-the-pandemic-part?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#media-d9cac490-3e92-474f-aae8-89ea5f0cdffd

Asset Pumping

 By Anna Von Reitz

My position on Private Membership Associations (PMAs) has been dealt with on several occasions.  In articles. In webinars. In interviews. 

Go to www.annavonreitz.com and use the Search Engine. 

I consider PMAs to be private clubs at the best of times, and at the worst of times, they act as secret societies. 

I don't belong to any PMAs myself. 

So why would I tell my Readers to join a PMA in order to get an account in "my" bank?  

I wouldn't.  And I didn't.  

Those promoting the Global Family PMA and its credit union were doing that on their own as PMA members. 

The most that was ever said to me or by me concerning that, was that they could migrate their credit union accounts over to the Blue Dot Bilateral Bank System when it opened up --- in the future.

The members of any credit union will be able to migrate accounts to our new bank system.  The rain can fall on the ocean, too. 

There was never any lack of clarity about the following issues in any of my discussions with anyone: 

(1) The Blue Dot Bilateral Bank System, aka, "my" bank, is a completely separate endeavor from the Global Family Private Membership Association. 

(2) I never required anyone to join a PMA in order to get an account in "my" bank.  

(3) I also never suggested that anyone go around opening multiple new accounts in Federal Reserve Banks all over the country. 

It looks to me like the people promoting the PMA and its credit union were involved in an Asset Pumping Scheme. 

Remember the bank scandal a few years ago, where the banks were creating multiple new accounts for depositors without telling them?  

Those "extra" accounts were used to make illicit escrow deals, money laundering, and, what the public wouldn't realize --- asset pumping. 

The more accounts a bank has, the more asset credit they can leverage from the public trusts.  

And while it is illegal for banks to purposefully create extra accounts for themselves, it's not illegal if individual people do it for them.   

Our people were being used to pump billions of dollars of credit assets into the Federal Reserve Bank System,  including Wells Fargo, which, last time I looked, is owned by the Department of Justice.  

It wasn't any pyramid scheme benefiting me or Hunter Aki, but it was an asset pumping scheme benefiting the Federal Reserve. 

So now we know why Darla, Anita, Yvonne, Xavier, and Eddie were pushing people to set up all these extra accounts.

Let's ask all the people who followed their lead--- didn't any of this hit you as strange?  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

"Special" Admiralty Courts

 By Anna Von Reitz

We have been the victims of many, many deceptions, and none greater than the misrepresentation of Military District Courts as the courts of the people. 

The military districts and the courts attached to them were instituted in May of 1865 by the British Territorial United States Government ---an institution that is only approved to exist under the terms and conditions of the actual Constitution of the United States of America (1789), and the Treaty of Paris (1783), which lacked the specific implementation provided by the Constitution referenced.  

There is no other basis to assume a contract.  

There are two kinds of actual courts on offer -- Maritime (British Commercial) and Admiralty Courts that have usurped upon the land jurisdiction courts of this country--- plus the so-called "Administrative Courts" which aren't actual courts at all, but are instead internal corporation tribunals.  

1. If you voluntarily enter the premises of these courts (inside the railing separating the court from the gallery) you are presumed to be granting them jurisdiction. 

2. If you argue about anything, you are presumed to be granting them jurisdiction. 

3. If you obey their judge about anything, even as simple as telling you to sit down, they assume jurisdiction.  

4.  If you accept being called "Mister" or "Missus" or "Miss" or "Doctor" or "Sir", etc. you are accepting titles, and presumed to be a British Territorial Subject--- granting jurisdiction to their court. 

5. You are considered guilty until proven innocent in these courts -- the exact opposite of our courts. 

6. If dragged into one of these courts under arrest or warrant, they give you a choice between "guilty" and "not guilty", but this is a False Choice which precludes the possibility that you are "innocent".  So you must know enough about their system to plead "Innocent" or, again, they will assume jurisdiction and railroad you. 

So, how else do these courts work and what are their weaknesses?  

1. They must have a contract to examine and rule upon.  If there is no contract for service, no contract in dispute, and no contract in evidence, they have no case and no reason to address you.  So ask, politely, where's the contract?  

They may bring up the State-of-State Constitution, or even the Federal Constitutions, but you are not a party subject to them, so, you ask,  "When was I informed and given full disclosure for my consent?" 

They won't have any answers, because in fact none of the Constitutions apply to normal folk --- only to those who work for the government and those who contract at a high level for the government services, and that isn't you. 

If you press them and keep on point, asking pointed questions, they will have no reply, because they don't have a contract with you. 

2. They have no defense against questions and questions do not allow them to seize jurisdiction, so you bedevil them with questions.  You turn everything they claim into a countering question. 

Example: 

The Prosecutor claims, "The DEFENDANT owes income taxes for the years 2003 to 2019." 

You ask, politely, "Where's the contract obligating me to pay taxes owed by the US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE?"

3. These courts live and die by Negative Averment -- that is, according to what should be-- and isn't-- present. 

So, asking for the contract which should be there, -------and isn't, is key. 

Asking for the source of purported "federal income" is key. 

Whatever should reasonably be present and isn't, is what you ask about.  

May I see the Prosecutor's Bid Bond?  

If he can't produce his Bid Bond on the case, there is no case, and you can innocently ask, "If there's no Bid Bond, then, how can there be a case?" 

And there can't be, so Mr. Prosecutor has to pay the court, and the charges against YOU get dismissed. 

And isn't that a good turn around? 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.