A Thought For All the Would-Be Whistleblowers

By Anna Von Reitz

It has become fashionable for Whistleblowers, especially would-be Whistleblowers who want to blow the whistle ( but not really do it), to claim that they have things like "the" Epstein videos, or "the" Bill Clinton talks with Putin, or "the......" ----well, you name it.  

They appear to want the notoriety, but they don't have the guts to actually blow any whistles.  They just talk about having whistles to blow.  

The fact is that if our Public Justice system were actually working, all the crooks doing all these unspeakable crimes would be in jail, Bill and Hillary would be in jail, probably thirty percent of all the "posers" and impostors substituting themselves for and pretending to be legitimate Public Officials and Public Officers, would be in jail.  Already. 

We've estimated that approximately two million Americans (and that's just Americans--- doesn't count all the other impostors in other countries) are engaged in criminal and knowing fraud and are deliberately operating under color of law as government officials, when they aren't even properly public employees.  

Okay, so that's the reality.  And that is going to be the reality until the vast bulk of Americans wake up and reclaim their birthright political status and assemble their States of the Union and enforce the Public Law. 

If you have information that needs to be known by the rest of the world, just blow the fricking whistle.  

Don't TALK about blowing the whistle.  Either do it or be damned.  

You get no points for "almost" blowing the whistle or for depending on your friends to be braver and more responsible than you, and blow it for you after your death.  

This whole idiocy of the "deadman's switch" still means that you are dead, and the people you left the information with nine-times-out-of-ten are: (1) just as scared of it as you were, and (2) have even less idea of how to expose it or who to pass it on to. 

Seth Rich is dead because he didn't get the garbage out.  Don't make the same mistakes.  NYPD is still sucking hind tits to the FBI because they didn't have guts enough to actually blow any whistles.  Don't falter in the chase. 

If you've got "the" Epstein Tapes, publish them on the internet.  Publish them direct to the White House.  Send the crap to Buckingham Palace.  Send it to the International Criminal Court.  Light up the rear end of their Office of the Prosecutor.  Give it to Anonymous.  

So, you took a powder and are living in Russia now?  

That means you have even less excuse for being feckless and failing to do the job set before you.  Russia has great access to the internet.  Blast it all out, 24/7.   

Let's see that film of Hillary and Huma skinning a little girl alive.  Maybe then the clueless people in this country will get a clue about who the real enemies are.  Let's see Epstein holding a gun to Mike Pence's head.  Let's see GHWB in the act with some cute little Call Boys.  Let's see Prince Andrew groping ten year-old girls. 

Don't get me wrong.  It's not that we want to see this sordid, vicious, nasty, criminal material for the sake of seeing it.  But if it exists, we need to see it to wake us up, to funnel the public outrage needed to sweep through this country like a wet mop and put an end to it. 

Sometimes it takes gut-wrenching "makes me want to throw up" stuff to get people truly motivated. So if that's what is going on, and you've got proof of it, let's see it.  Let's see it all.  Now. 

At the end of the day, there is no better way to diffuse "explosive" information than to let it explode.  Just stand back and let 'er rip.  The Vermin will be so busy worrying about how to save their own butts, they won't have time or money to go after you---- once you've actually blown the whistle.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Weeding Through Similar Names: People v. Persons

By Anna Von Reitz

People in this country are simply called "people".  Only "persons" are classed as either "residents" or "inhabitants".  

This goes back to the settlement of The War of Independence and the Treaty of Peace (1783).  Americans are the "free, sovereign, and independent people" referenced---- and the "inhabitants" are the British sailors and customs agents and others left here after the war to provide "essential government services" under the terms of the peace treaty.  

Both "inhabitants" and "residents" are here as foreigners on our soil and both are understood to have a temporary domicile on our soil while delivering essential government services. 

In the "fine points" of the law, the British Territorials are called "inhabitants" and Municipal citizens of the United States are called "residents", though both are Federal Citizens and in actual common practice, everyone but the higher courts and better educated lawyers use the terms interchangeably. 

Their State of State --- the Territorial State of State --- has always been called "the" State of New York and "the" State of Connecticut, just as their Territorial entity doing business in our name and exercising some of our delegated powers has always been called "the" United States of America, while the actual country has always been called The United States of America.  

This similarity of names has been the source of endless confusion and deceits, but it is actually pretty easy to sort out.  People live in States.  Persons live in States of States.   Whenever you see reference to "the" United States of America, you know that you are seeing a discussion about the British Territorial United States Government and whenever you see "the" State of New York or records referencing such an entity, you know that you are looking at the Territorial version, too.  The naming conventions may initially be confusing, but they are, as you note, consistent throughout.  

The Federation State called "New York" gives rise to the Confederation State of State that is supposed to be doing business as The State of New York.  As always, the definite article is part of the Proper Name.   Just as we live in The United States of America, people living in New York are supposed to be served by their own State of State business entity and that entity is The State of New York.   

The is also affirmed by the rules of English Grammar.  When you have "the" State of New York, you are describing by definition "a" State of New York, but when you say, "The State of New York" you are describing a unique entity having an unincorporated and sovereign character.  

Perhaps this would be easier to see if you consider this same proposition with a common name like "John Brown".   We all know that there may be many men named "John Brown" so we factor that in and easily accept the fact that there may be a John Brown who lives on Clarkson Avenue and another John Brown who lives in Mount Pleasant, thus though the name appears identical, we may be speaking about "a" John Brown but not The John Brown, a ship in the navy.  

I hope this helps and that henceforward, you will be more readily enabled to identify the apples (American) from the oranges (British) organizations which took root at nearly the same time and which share such disconcertingly similar names.  

If you are looking for American records they are much harder to find because the British have largely purged all American references from their records to promote their secretive take-over attempt, however, if you are diligent, you will find an abundance of records that refer to both the Federation and the Confederation belonging to the States of the Union and you will also find reference to the American States of States, as The State of New York and The State of Ohio, etc.  

Finally, please note --- again --- that our States are not States of States.  

The State is New York.  The State is California.  The State is Ohio.   See that? 

People live in New York.  

Territorial Persons "inhabit" the State of New York, and still other Municipal PERSONS "reside" in the STATE OF NEW YORK.  

See the difference?  

All "States of States" are "doing business as" entities and they are by definition not States of the Union.  Period.   

Take a look at the Definitions Section of the Uniform Commercial Code and look up the definition of "state of state".  Get this nailed down in your heads: States are not States of States.  

The members of the American Confederation of States of States [formed under The Articles of Confederation, March 1, 1781] which is supposed to be running our Federal Government is composed of entities doing business as: The State of New York, The State of Florida.... and so on.  

The members of the British Territorial States of States operate as "the" State of New York, "the" State of Florida.... and so on.  

And the members of the Municipal STATES OF STATES operate as "the" STATE OF NEW YORK, "the" STATE OF FLORIDA" and so on.  

Please note that no Municipal STATES OF STATES should exist, and that the Territorial States of States are continuing to usurp against the actual States by obfuscating the status of and need for completion of the Reconstruction of the American States of States. 

Only the actual States and People of this country can reconstruct the American States of States.  Only we can do the work of the Reconstruction.  And we have studiously been kept misinformed about the need to do so, by those benefiting themselves from our ignorance.  

But cheer up.  The wheels are finally beginning to roll and the dawn is coming as more and more Americans wake up, reclaim their birthright political status, and assemble their actual States.  Once the States are all assembled, we will be ready to move forward and restore the actual Federal Government we are owed.  

Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

From Tom Tancredo and Team America: Re-Posting:

By Anna Von Reitz

*****Note from Grandma***** I am re-posting this article to make sure everyone sees it and gets the message: we are, as a country, dealing with an entrenched, incestuous crime syndicate infesting the center of the Federal Government. It's not just a swamp. It is The Swamp. And nobody can clean this mess up but the American People, standing together and organizing their lawful government and enforcing the Public Law. The Clintons stand at the epicenter of all this criminal activity. I am sorry to tell many good and loyal people who are Democrats that the voting records of their heroes don't match their words, and the enslavement scheme we have all suffered has Democrat fingerprints all over it. That isn't to say that Republicans haven't been dirty, too, but the principal evils have all been promoted by Democratic Administrations, from Wilson, to FDR, to LBJ, to the Clintons, the story of Democrats criminally undermining and selling out America and Americans is the same. And it is not a coincidence. *****

_______________________________

Everyone should take the time to read this. Slowly, and patiently, because it’s very important.

From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation. A Grand Jury had been impaneled. Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”.

Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared. Now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

Look who took over this investigation in 2005, none other than James Comey. Coincidence? Guess who was transferred into the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS? None other than, Lois Lerner. Isn’t that interesting?

But this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right? Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Justice from 2001 to 2005? None other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame? Another coincidence (just an anomaly in statistics and chances), but it was Robert Mueller.

What do all four casting characters have in common? They all were briefed and/or were front-line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation. Another coincidence, right?

Fast forward to 2009. James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin. Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, official government business, on her own personal email server. The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of Hillary. Like all good public servants do, supposedly looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians. Now, you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t.

America got absolutely nothing out of it.

However, prior to the sales approval, none other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid $500,000 for a one hour speech; then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours. Ok, no big deal right? Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during this time frame. He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009. Who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland? None other than, Rod Rosenstein.

And what happened to the informant? The Department of Justice placed a gag order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

Very soon after; the sale was approved. $145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal. Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division? None other than, Lois Lerner.

Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right? Let’s fast forward to 2015. Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server. He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law. He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this, they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

.

Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013? None other than James Comey, who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a $6 million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer?

Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at the State Department.

Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and he exonerates her. Nope, couldn’t find any crimes there.

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury! Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Comey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July 5th of 2016, and exonerates Hillary from any wrongdoing.

Do you see the pattern?

It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Assistant Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA abuse, political espionage pick a crime, any crime, chances are this group and a few others did it:

All the same players.

All compromised and conflicted.

All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

All connected in one way or another to the Clinton's.

They are like battery acid; they corrode and corrupt everything they touch. How many lives have these two destroyed?

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service. Let us not forget that Comey's brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation's taxes.

The person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies? Yes, that would be Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Let’s learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian’s background. Lisa H. Barsoomian, an Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a protégé of James Comey and Robert Mueller. Barsoomian, with her boss R. Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998.

Lawrence also represented;

Robert Mueller three times,

James Comey five times,

Barack Obama 45 times,

Kathleen Sebelius 56 times,

Bill Clinton 40 times,

and Hillary Clinton 17 times.

Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times.

You may be saying to yourself, who cares about the work history of this Barsoomian woman? Apparently, someone does, because someone out there cares so much that they’ve “purged” all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals Court dockets. Someone out there cares so much that even the internet has been “purged” of all information pertaining to Barsoomian.

Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative.

Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community. Although, Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney, her email address is LisaBarsoomian@NIH.gov.

The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health. This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities. It’s a cover, so big deal right? What does one more attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter?

It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of California, the Uni-party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper leaks, the Comey leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal and subsequent 14 month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization mix and last but not least Mueller’s never-ending investigation into collusion between the Trump team and the Russians.

Why does Barsoomian, CIA operative, merit any mention? Because she is Assistant Attorney General Rod

Rosenstein’s wife."

- Tom Tancredo/Team America

Liars, Liars, Pants on Fire.... 31 October 2019

By Anna Von Reitz

Richard S. and Phil Hudok continue their efforts to justify their own mistakes and Bad Faith.   They would have you sign up and volunteer to give up your share of America in exchange for more debt.   If that makes sense to you, go right ahead. 

Remember this, my Readers--- the Federal Code exists to hold Federal Citizens accountable to us and to publish for the whole world to see, what their obligations are.  When you "remind them" of what their obligations are, you are not offering to stand under any Federal Code yourself.  

So when you tell the United States Secretary of State that you are an American claiming your birthright political status as an American State National, and you remind him that this political status is recognized under his Federal Code at 8 USC 1101 (a) 21, you are not placing yourself under Federal Code.  You are placing him under his obligation to you.  

There are those devious and dishonest individuals trying to misrepresent both what is, and what isn't.  There are also a lot of clueless but otherwise good people following along like sheep, thinking that they are getting something of value, when in fact, they are simply buying themselves more debt and further devaluing the currency.  

Good luck with that.  A negative seven plus a negative seven still equals a negative fourteen.  

So long as you are neither active duty US Military, nor a Federal Civil Service employee, nor a dependent thereof, and not seeking welfare nor political asylum, you are not under the obligations of any Federal Code, and you deny that you are under any obligation of Federal Code, simply by reclaiming your birthright political status as an American State National.  

Why?  Because although the Federales allow Dual Citizenship, the actual States of the Union do not.  

Mr. Pompeo cannot "misunderstand" you when you say you are a Wisconsinite or a New Yorker, because when you claim that status, that's the only such status you can hold. 

It's one way or the other so far as the States are concerned.  Remember that. 

Federales hold Dual Citizenship.   Any Dual Citizenship will do.  Many members of their treasonous Municipal Congress hold "US Citizenship" and citizenship in foreign countries like Luxembourg or Israel or Thailand. 

Both varieties of "US" citizenship --- United States [Territorial] Citizenship and Municipal citizens of the United States --- are foreign with respect to our States of the Union.  So if you claim to be a "US" citizen, you are -- believe it or not -- claiming to act as a foreigner in your own country.  

Americans hold American State Nationality --- and may freely choose to serve their States of the Union as State Citizens--- or not.  

You can start your life as an American State National or even serve as an American State Citizen, and subsequently choose to accept Federal Employment, and adopt either Territorial United States Citizenship (military employees) or Municipal United States citizenship (Federal Civil Service) --- which changes your political status.  

You remain in the foreign status of a "US" Citizen or citizen as long as you work for the Federal Government, and you may remain in that status for the rest of your life and may be presumed to have "abandoned" your share of America, if you don't serve Notice and tell Mike Pompeo and/or the heads of your branch of service otherwise. 

As I have said from the beginning of this discussion, it really is up to you --- you can subject yourself to the Queen, you can volunteer to enslave yourself to the Pope.  You can do any self-destructive, stupid thing you like.  You have the inviolable right to contract.  

My only point in all of this is that people deserve to know what they are losing and what they are gaining in any transaction --- including the results of giving away their birthright as Americans.  So I have told you.  

If you are an American, it's time to stand up and say so, and claim your part of the pie.  The actual, factual America.  Not any "representation" thereof. 

If not, enjoy being in debt far, far, far over your heads and having everything you think you own subject to collection, including your physical bodies. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

Dear Mr. Trump.... 31 October 2019

By Anna Von Reitz

You aren't a stupid man, so I can only assume that you are getting bad "legal" advice.  

Please bear in mind that the actual government of this country deals in what is lawful, not in what is legal --- and that all the Bar Attorneys in the world are incompetent to advise you about actual Law.  Strange, but true. 

The Power-Holder Office --- the actual Presidency --- is: "President of The United States of America" ---- not President of "the" United States of America, and not President of the United States.  

You need to declare your political status as a native New Yorker and enter into the Power-Holder Office, retain your Territorial Office as Commander-in-Chief, and retain your Municipal Office as President of the United States. 

Once you enter upon the actual Office of President of The United States of America, you will be functioning as the Employer of both the Territorial and the Municipal Government entities, a position that will allow you to sever their contracts and bring them --- howling, yes, but --- back into line.  

Please also inform Pope Francis and the United Nations  that the Municipal ("Civil" as in Federal Civil Service) United States Government has never had any authority or ability to transfer our states, our state offices, or our state laws to United Nations control per their International Organizations Immunity Act (1976). It was and it is, null and void, from inception. 

Read that: the Pope can't sponsor a civil war on our shores between the Territorial and Municipal Governments, because he owns both, and he can't propose a civil war on our shores using the UN, either, because he owns all those franchise "governments", too, and also because the Municipal Government has no authority beyond the limited powers granted to it. 

They were self-evidently and fraudulently offering to trade on what was never theirs. 

All this chicanery revolves around the fact that he, Francis, and the Roman Curia, are trying to avoid their obligation to liquidate their corporations for criminal activity.  Their corporations are allowed to exist "for any lawful purpose" ---- not "for any legal purpose".   

This again underlines why it is important for you to learn the difference between what is "lawful" and what is "legal".  

We now have 39 States properly constituted and are closing fast.  We know where the bodies are buried and we know how to play crack the whip on Congress.  We also have the only proper and fully documented claim to all American assets that have been unlawfully, illegally, and immorally put at risk. 

Don't put up with the sideshow in DC.  Reclaim your proper political status as a New Yorker, enter the Power-Holder Office, retain the Office of Commander-in-Chief, retain the Office of President of the United States, and tell them all how high to jump.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Public Employee Union Problem - 31 October 2019

By Anna Von Reitz

I have, admittedly, mixed feelings about Labor Unions.  On one hand, they have been instrumental in improving the lives of workers worldwide, and they have been the means to establish reasonable wage parity, and they have stood in the way of the Robber Barons --- venal corporate predators.  They have also led the way forward on benefits for working people --- medical care, pensions, and other measures that decency and social stability reasonably require. 

I am speaking here more of the historical and ongoing role of Blue Collar Labor Unions.  

A lesser known though larger sector of the labor union movement is represented by the White Collar Labor Unions --- and in this country, largely, to AFSCME, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees and the National Teacher's Union.  There are, of course, many other varieties of Public Employee Unions--- for example, the Air Traffic Controller's Union that Reagan busted. 

I used to work for AFSCME many years ago, during my misguided youth.  It was bad then.  It's far worse now.  The problems involved are not simple to resolve, but as a consumer, I have bones to pick with public employee unions on various issues that are becoming more and more critical as time goes by.

Unions tend to consolidate power and then play the Bully Boy position, just as their Robber Baron counterparts in heavy industry used to do against the workers.  When the pendulum swings too far in the direction of worker pay and benefits, the economy suffers and in the end, the workers lose jobs because they help put their employers out of business. It's a fine line to walk, and if you lose your perspective or botch your national trade policies (our primary problem) you wind up with a horror story like Detroit.    

I am not suggesting that trying to compete with slave labor in other countries is a viable answer --- rather, the answer is to help workers in other countries and other governments to raise the living standards of their own workers via more adept trade practices and negotiations designed to wipe out the problem of child and slave labor worldwide. 

For us, its a problem of unfair competition.  For them, it's a problem of entrenched misery and poverty.  

We could, with more enlightened labor and trade policies wipe out both problems ---- but the Democrats in Congress --- who are supposed (at least verbally) to be the friends of working people, have neglected these opportunities for decades and are now more concerned about trying to cover up their own dirty dealing, including Hillary's Uranium One deal and Benghazi debacle, and Joe Biden's influence peddling to the tune of over a billion dollars----ironically enough, by accusing Donald Trump of doing what they have already done themselves.  

Meanwhile, as our Blue Collar Unions--- and more to the point, American Blue Collar Workers and the companies that employ them---  have struggled to walk that Unfair Competition line with no help from Washington, DC, the White Collar Labor Unions, especially AFSCME, which has grown to be the largest labor union in the world and to have its fingers in many other countries besides the USA, and the National Teacher's Union, refuse to honor common sense. 

What is an American Public Employee's Labor Union --- AFSCME --- doing organizing public employees in Singapore?  Or Portugal?  And what kind of conflicts of interests and improper power-base building does that imply for our government organizations---- whether corporate or incorporated?  

Quite beyond the question of whether public employee unions should be legal at all --- which is a question that should be asked, and the pros and cons in terms of the Public Good assessed --- should it be legal for public employee unions to form foreign franchises and act as transnational corporations in control of government functions on a worldwide basis?  

I think the answer to the first question -- should public employee unions be allowed -- is a guarded "yes".  And the answer to the second question -- should public employee unions be allowed to spread offshore from country to country -- is a definite "no". 

The reasoning in favor of allowing public employee unions is simple.  The corporations that are presently operating "as" our government are rapacious, largely criminal enterprises that have illegally commandeered our lawful government and there is no plausible excuse for leaving our public employees at their mercy.  That would only reduce public employment to the level of slave labor and guarantee that nobody with an IQ above 50 would be employed in public jobs. 

The reasoning behind prohibiting transnational labor unions is equally stark: the situation is bad enough with transnational for-profit "governmental services corporations" operating illegally as national governments, and colluding together in umbrella organizations like "the" UN  to create and enforce de facto worldwide government structures "for" us.  We don't need transnational public employee labor unions adding another dimension to that problem. 

We already need to bust the government services corporations situation, without also having to bust transnational public employee unions.

You see how this works? 

1. The private for-profit corporations in the business of providing governmental services hire public employees "for" us.  

2. The corporations expand under Color of Law and via improper exercise of government powers, they become corrupt. 

3. The labor unions follow in their footsteps and organize the public employees (who are, nonetheless, privately employed as subcontractors) --- and the result is that the entire world becomes subservient to both the "governmental services corporations" and the public employee unions. 

By allowing public employee unions to function as transnational corporations, the national governments of every country are creating a double problem for themselves --- not only the subcontracting service corporations that all have their paws in our pockets illegally --- but the labor unions, too, get into position to tell their actual employers how high to jump. 

The purported Friends of Labor in Congress, have been far too busy to consider any aspects of the Public Good for many years, but it is clear that someone has to start.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Get Sharp, Stay Sharp, and Be Honest

By Anna Von Reitz

As my Readers have learned: 

The United States of America is not the same as "the" United States of America, nor is it the same as "the united" States of America.  

The Rule of Law is not Law.  

The State of Wisconsin is not "the" State of Wisconsin, nor "the" STATE OF WISCONSIN, either.  

There is exactly one (1) actual State called Wisconsin --- no "State of" descriptor is attached to that name.  Wisconsin is Wisconsin.  Period.  

There are three original Constitutions in which powers were delegated and shared among subcontractors, including two (2) foreign governments, in the business of providing governmental services.  

The two foreign subcontractors were the British Monarch and the Pope.  

The American subcontractor was the original Confederation of States of States formed under the Articles of Confederation, but the Confederation split apart in 1860 and has never been reconstructed by the States of our Federation of States --- The United States of America.  

This created a vacuum of power, and first the British, and then later the Popes, usurped into this vacancy, substituting their own "state of state" franchises for the actual American organizations we are owed.  

Thus, by guile, omission, and sleight of hand, these foreign subcontractors that are supposed to be here operating in "good faith" to provide a few enumerated services have endeavored to commandeer our federal government.  

They have largely succeeded for 150 years, until now. 

The "Civil Government" provided by the Popes and the Municipal United States Government, is not the same as our civilian government.  

The military is obligated to take its orders from the civilian government, but instead, the civil government (think Federal Civil Service) has been substituting itself as the civilian authority.  This is a foreign civilian populace at best, and has no authority granted to it to substitute itself for our civilian government. 

These similar name deceits have been used throughout --- "The" versus "the", State of State versus State, and even STATE OF STATE versus State, "Rule of Law" versus actual "Law", "civil government" substituted for "civilian government" and so on.  

To beat these monsters at their game requires us to be sharp enough to recognize the subtle differences in language and to question these differences instead of "assuming" anything.  It requires us to learn what has aptly been described as "code" as in code words and Federal Code, and also to recognize it when we are dealing with the Territorial Government and when we are dealing with the Municipal Government.  

Most of all, it requires us to know who we are, what our actual country and nationality is, and what we are owed from these bilkers, as well as a practical grasp of their court system and why it has no jurisdiction related to us. 

Their courts deal in contract law, exclusively.  

They assume that they have contracts with you, in part because of falsified public records, in part because of adhesion contracts you are coerced into, and in part they just plain bluff it until they can stuff it.  

It is your job to defeat them in their purposes and to expose their corruption and to demand reform.  

Never identify yourself by your full name.  Just first and middle.  Ask the court if they are dealing in contract law.  They will have to admit, yes.  Then ask to see the contract subjecting YOUR NAME to their jurisdiction.  

They will either dismiss on the spot or bring a variety of records or reference a State of State Constitution.  

You must reply that you live in a State, not a State of State, and are not a signatory on any State of State Constitution.  

And for the rest, you must be prepared to make appropriate reply.  

Birth Certificates are all Unconscionable and Coerced contracts established by Third Parties when you were only days old. 

Licenses of all kinds and mortgages, have all been obtained and enforced under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure, so that you made a mistake under duress, and wish to correct that mistake.  

Better still, do your paperwork and be able to bring along the public record evidence that you already did make the effort to self-correct the "mistake". 

Aside from these sorts of things, these courts ---generally speaking --- have no contracts and no jurisdiction related to Joe Average American. 

Their only actual justification for being here is to provide you with good faith service, a fact that they need to have repeated and repeated in their ears, until they finally wake up and go --- "OMG!  Just look at what I've been doing!"  

But you can only provide that cathartic experience for your public servants once you have a firm hand on who you are, where you stand, who they are, where they stand, and learn to navigate the space between.  

It is important to stay scrupulously honest.  They are --- knowingly or unknowingly --- engaged in criminal activity.  So you must give them no excuse to complain against you, like the filthy guilty Democrats are now attempting to claim their own sins against President Trump.  

You must stand above them as the cliffs stand above the sea. And when the day comes, let them dash themselves like useless waves against eternity.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.