By Anna Von Reitz
I have, admittedly, mixed feelings about Labor
Unions. On one hand, they have been instrumental in improving the lives of
workers worldwide, and they have been the means to establish reasonable wage
parity, and they have stood in the way of the Robber Barons --- venal corporate
predators. They have also led the way forward on benefits for working
people --- medical care, pensions, and other measures that decency and social
stability reasonably require.
I am speaking here more of the historical and
ongoing role of Blue Collar Labor Unions.
A lesser known though larger sector of the labor
union movement is represented by the White Collar Labor Unions --- and in this
country, largely, to AFSCME, the American Federation of State, County, and
Municipal Employees and the National Teacher's Union. There are, of
course, many other varieties of Public Employee Unions--- for example, the Air
Traffic Controller's Union that Reagan busted.
I used to work for AFSCME many years ago, during my
misguided youth. It was bad then. It's far worse now. The
problems involved are not simple to resolve, but as a consumer, I have bones to
pick with public employee unions on various issues that are becoming more
and more critical as time goes by.
Unions tend to consolidate power and then play the
Bully Boy position, just as their Robber Baron counterparts in heavy industry
used to do against the workers. When the pendulum swings too far in the
direction of worker pay and benefits, the economy suffers and in the end, the
workers lose jobs because they help put their employers out of business. It's a
fine line to walk, and if you lose your perspective or botch your national trade
policies (our primary problem) you wind up with a horror story like
Detroit.
I am not suggesting that trying to compete with
slave labor in other countries is a viable answer --- rather, the answer is to
help workers in other countries and other governments to raise the living
standards of their own workers via more adept trade practices and negotiations
designed to wipe out the problem of child and slave labor
worldwide.
For us, its a problem of unfair competition.
For them, it's a problem of entrenched misery and
poverty.
We could, with more enlightened labor and trade
policies wipe out both problems ---- but the Democrats in Congress --- who are
supposed (at least verbally) to be the friends of working people, have neglected
these opportunities for decades and are now more concerned about trying to cover
up their own dirty dealing, including Hillary's Uranium One deal and Benghazi
debacle, and Joe Biden's influence peddling to the tune of over a billion
dollars----ironically enough, by accusing Donald Trump of doing what they have
already done themselves.
Meanwhile, as our Blue Collar Unions--- and more to
the point, American Blue Collar Workers and the companies that employ
them--- have struggled to walk that Unfair Competition line with no help
from Washington, DC, the White Collar Labor Unions, especially AFSCME, which has
grown to be the largest labor union in the world and to have its fingers in many
other countries besides the USA, and the National Teacher's Union, refuse to
honor common sense.
What is an American Public Employee's Labor Union
--- AFSCME --- doing organizing public employees in Singapore? Or
Portugal? And what kind of conflicts of interests and improper power-base
building does that imply for our government organizations---- whether corporate
or incorporated?
Quite beyond the question of whether public
employee unions should be legal at all --- which is a question that should be
asked, and the pros and cons in terms of the Public Good assessed --- should it
be legal for public employee unions to form foreign franchises and act as
transnational corporations in control of government functions on a worldwide
basis?
I think the answer to the first question -- should
public employee unions be allowed -- is a guarded "yes". And the answer to
the second question -- should public employee unions be allowed to spread
offshore from country to country -- is a definite
"no".
The reasoning in favor of allowing public employee
unions is simple. The corporations that are presently operating "as" our
government are rapacious, largely criminal enterprises that have illegally
commandeered our lawful government and there is no plausible excuse for leaving
our public employees at their mercy. That would only reduce public
employment to the level of slave labor and guarantee that nobody with an IQ
above 50 would be employed in public jobs.
The reasoning behind prohibiting transnational
labor unions is equally stark: the situation is bad enough with transnational
for-profit "governmental services corporations" operating illegally as national
governments, and colluding together in umbrella organizations like "the"
UN to create and enforce de facto worldwide government structures "for"
us. We don't need transnational public employee labor unions adding
another dimension to that problem.
We already need to bust the government services
corporations situation, without also having to bust transnational public
employee unions.
You see how this
works?
1. The private for-profit corporations in the
business of providing governmental services hire public employees "for"
us.
2. The corporations expand under Color of Law and
via improper exercise of government powers, they become
corrupt.
3. The labor unions follow in their footsteps and
organize the public employees (who are, nonetheless, privately employed as
subcontractors) --- and the result is that the entire world becomes subservient
to both the "governmental services corporations" and the public employee
unions.
By allowing public employee unions to function as
transnational corporations, the national governments of every country are
creating a double problem for themselves --- not only the subcontracting service
corporations that all have their paws in our pockets illegally --- but the labor
unions, too, get into position to tell their actual employers how high to
jump.
The purported Friends of Labor in Congress, have
been far too busy to consider any aspects of the Public Good for many years, but
it is clear that someone has to
start.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Aviation has been globalized and protects its own hint tossing a few token people to the dogs without ever talking to them. Some distant foreign bureaucrat denies a medical based on drug sales scares and your job and income is gone. They claimed coming to help and now 80 percent of America’s small airports are ghost towns. Only the biz jets seem to be able to enjoy the flying machines.💫
ReplyDelete