This is the kind of stuff that will start the next civil war in Amerika

Florida cops kill innocent man at his own home

http://rt.com/usa/news/florida-man-police-kill-325/

http://libertycrier.com/front-page/florida-cops-kill-innocent-man-at-his-own-home/

Hearing a knock on his door at 1:30 am, a perplexed Florida man answered the door to see what kind of unannounced visitors were outside. Holding a gun for security, 26-year old Andrew Scott was instantly shot dead by police after he opened the door.
It took the Lake County Police Department an hour and a half to realize they had killed an innocent man.
“There’s things I would have done differently, but you never know when you wake up out of a sleep and somebody’s knocking on your door,” a neighbor told Fox 35 News. “You don’t know what’s going on.”
The police had been searching for Jonathan Brown and an accomplice, who had attacked a man in the street and attempted to smash a cinder block on his head before being stopped by a passerby. Being pursued by deputies, the attempted murderer escaped, and Florida police began their search.
Seeing Brown’s motorcycle parked outside of Scott’s building, they quietly approached, refraining from announcing themselves outside of the wrongly suspected attacker’s door to avoid scaring him off. Upon seeing the man’s gun, the police opened fire, leaving multiple bullet holes in his door as they killed the innocent man. Neighbors awoke to the sound of gunfire and screams from the victim’s girlfriend.
“I was in bed and heard about seven or eight gunshots. Got up, looked outside the window, by that time you heard a woman screaming,” a neighbor told Fox 35 News.
After realizing their mistake, police found 31-year old Brown in the building next door and arrested him.
Neighbors said Scott was a nice guy, and find the mix-up a sad mistake. The police department says it would not have opened fire if the man had not been holding a gun, but neighbors want to know why the authorities didn’t identify themselves at the door.
But Scott was just one of many victims of police pursuits each year. In the U.S., innocent bystanders account for a third of those killed in police chases, according to USA TODAY. Each year, 360 people are killed in high-speed chases. While Scott was killed in another manner, his death shows the level of carelessness sometimes found in police departments while pursuing a suspect.

Think (unregistered) July 18, 2012, 10:05

Your giving them LEAVE? THEY can't even read the address correctly! FIRE THEM! They Did NOT Follow PROCEDURE! THEY DID NOT Announce Themselves as POLICE, THEY KILLED A INNOCENT MAN! This isn't 'BIZARRE', THEY are INCOMPETENT! TAKE THEIR GUNS! The man had every right to answer his door with a gun. They wear Black and Strapped with GUNS, 1:00 in the morning! Aggressively Moving Toward the INNOCENT man, with guns drawn. There HAS to be a TRIAL! We Have to start testing Cops for COMPETENCE, CHARACTER, PERSONALITY TRAITS! 'Trained' to know? I was AMAZED How MANY COPS Had Killed INNOCENT PEOPLE when I searched 'Police killed innocent Man'!!!! In Cali a 19 yr old was killed when they asked to see his $2 ticket! They shot him in the back and neck and then let him bleed to death! And an 81 yr old man chased some cops off his lawn thinking they were drug dealers and the police Shot Him! Where DID the Counties, State, Federal get these Idiots From? THOSE WHO HIRED THEM ARE ON THE BLOCK TOO. THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE as well and need to PAY for the INSTABILITY of the people THEY have HIRED! Heads need to roll here!

Mike (unregistered) July 18, 2012, 07:34

It's really sad that we as Americans need to protect ourselves from the police. I cringe everytime I hear the saying America the free, how can any American still believe that we are a free nation? We live in a police state and have been for quite a few years now and if we the American people don't do something about it very soon, you all think Nazi Germany was bad? If cops can get away with murdering innocent people now, think about it! Millions of Americans will be slaughted by our government.

Mike (unregistered) July 18, 2012, 07:0

That could have happened to anybodies son or father. What these cops did is unforgiveable! that could have been my 26 year old innocent son, and if it was me I would hunt those cops down like the animals they are! How do you bang on a door unannounced not sure if you have the right apt. and shoot an innocent man who brought his gun to the door for protection never in a million years thinking it was cops? They better be held accountable!!

Fred Kelly Grant to Sheriffs

This article is written by the same Fred Kelly Grant that has endorsed Steve Curtiss for commissioner of Lincoln County Montana here: 

http://www.mtbus.com/curtissforcommissioner.htm

Message to Sheriff’s Meeting in Del Norte County

on July 14, 2012

July 14, 2012----------by Fred Kelly Grant

Many weeks ago I gladly accepted Sheriff Dean Wilson’s invitation to appear today at this event. I have the deepest respect for Sheriff Wilson, and for his wife Mary, both of whom work as hard as humanly possible to protect our God-given rights. Beyond price in dollars is their work in spreading the word about how local officials can step up the pace to regain the traditional American way of life that is eluding our children.

I respect just as deeply the Sheriffs appearing today: Mike Poindexter of Modoc, Dave Hencratt of Tehama, Mike Downey of Humboldt, Tom Allman of Mendocino, Jon Lopey of Siskiyou, and of course Gil Gilbertson of Oregon’s Josephine County. The (sic) have taken a giant step forward to defend the rights of their citizens---they have used the “coordination” authority granted them by federal and state laws to take a meaningful role in preventing usurpation of property rights by bureaucratic government agencies.

They recognize and put into practice the traditional constitutional authority of the office of Sheriff, the primary law enforcement officer with the responsibility of providing for the peace of the community. They take a proactive role in working for the economic stability of their communities and the citizens within: without economic health, there is insufficient revenue base to support necessary public safety and health services. So, they urge re-creation of the logging projects that support schools and other services necessary to care for the public health and safety. They take a proactive role in preventing the close (sic) down of the forests through travel management plans, knowing that public health and safety requires open travel. They take a proactive role in developing policy regarding the dams on the Klamath River because they know the adverse impact on the rural economy of destruction.

These Sheriffs have created a new ray of hope for citizens long oppressed by arbitrary agency actions. The agencies are required to respond and work with the Sheriffs by federal and state laws.

I back them fully, and hope that this meeting is a great success in gaining strength of support for them. I pledge to them that I will help them in every way that I can.

I am terribly upset that I had to break my commitment to Dean Wilson to attend this meeting. There is work that I am involved with to defend the coordination concept from a movement to create new legislation in Congress dealing with coordination and “cooperating agency” status. You all know the problems that “cooperating agency” status can get you into---some of our well meaning friends do not “get it”, and their efforts at legislation could afford the extremist environmentalists the opportunity to limit or extinguish the coordination mandate. The urgency of this issue prevents my being there. But, I am there in spirit, and I offer my most sincere apologies to Sheriff Wilson and to you all.

I have now retired from active daily coordination work; I have left in the capable hands of Trademark America the daily work that can help move along the efforts at regaining the rightful power of local governments. I will still be helping the Sheriffs in developing their concepts and implementing them. And, I will be looking for one BIG PROJECT THAT CAN CAUSE DC TO SHAKE. Nominations are open for that Project!

I want to tell you what I predict is going to happen over the next few months, and into the new year after the November elections.

We are in for an overwhelming onslaught of new and more severe regulations. Right now, and until November, you can expect to see concession after concession to extremist environmental groups and causes. The Secretary of Interior withdrew lands from uranium mining exploration in northern Arizona. He did this as concession to Bruce Babbitt and his environmental friends at the Grand Canyon Conservancy, as a long promised blow to uranium mining. The lands withdrawn contain the source for 40 percent of all the domestic uranium we use to support nuclear energy plants in the nation. The action will cause BILLIONS OF DOLLARS in economic losses to eight counties in northern Arizona and southern Utah. This action was take EVEN THOUGH PROOF PROVIDED BY THE SECRETARY’S OWN PERSONNEL SHOW THAT THERE IS (sic) AND NEVER HAS BEEN CONTAMINATION OF THE WATER BY THE URANIUM MINING.

I am convinced that had it not been for the coordination efforts by Siskiyou County, the Secretary would have made his decision to move ahead with destruction of the dams on the Klamath River.

The Forest Service has engaged in close-downs of roads and trails in every forest in the country. Only the actions of sheriffs and county officials through the coordination process have prevented complete shut-downs.

The BLM and Forest Service have combined to begin planning for the protection of the Sage Grouse on a regional basis, to prevent particular counties from using their coordination authority to protect against an end or limitation to livestock grazing.

The owl habitat plans for northern California and the northwest will do away with what logging is left.

The Environmental Protection Agency and the Corps of Engineers is simply waiting for the appropriate time to release and enforce their “Clean Water” regulation that will implement the failed Clean Water Act Restoration. The regulation will extend federal control to every body of water in the United States, including “dry desert potholes”, and every piece of land that adjoins, is near, or is affected by any body of water----do you get that? The federal government will control every parcel of land in the United States and subject it to Corps of Engineers permitting.

The Environmental Protection Agency is waiting to release its dust control regulation----that will make it impossible for every dry land farmer in the nation to continue in operation. Agricultural experts tell us that there is no possible way to comply with the regulation throughout the great middle western and high plains farming states.

The Environmental Protection Agency is waiting to release its boiler control regulations---that will make it impossible for any steam boiler manufacturer to warrant that its product will meet the regulation. The regulation will kill the manufacturing and production companies that are left. The regulation was slated for release earlier, but President Obama ordered it retracted “for the time being”. Don’t you imagine that the day after the November results are final will end “the time being”, and the regulation will be issued?

Down through the lines we could go-----with each regulatory agency that can harm our western, rural economies-----no, not “harm”, “destroy”.

If President Obama wins the election, the regulations can roll out, free from the worry by the administration of political fall-out (sic); if he loses, the regulations will roll out quickly over the next two months before the new administration takes office.

I believe that the two months between early November and mid-January may be the most crucial two months in our history; personal liberty and private property rights are in dire jeopardy.

Congress can’t stop it, even if there was a will to do so. Congress is broken!!! The grid-lock is pathetic. And some congressmen are even suggesting that the Founders intended for gridlock to occur. How ridiculous to believe that those brave Americans risked their lives and freedom for gridlock!!! I still maintain that every person elected to Congress should have to pass a test showing that they understood every provision of the Constitution, and the history of the Constitutional convention that led to the final document. I believe if that test were given today, we would see a massive exodus from the Capital.

Fortunately for you folks, you have the prospect of a new Congressman in Doug LaMalpha (sic) who does understand, who “gets it”. And you have the incumbent Congressman Tom McClintock who stands firm with your local officials in their efforts to intervene for your property rights.

The real problem with America today is the massive overgrowth of the bureaucracy. Just as an overgrown forest is unhealthy, an overgrowth of bureaucratic regulatory restrictions renders liberty unhealthy. Our Founders did not provide a government to be run by bureaucrats. I have a tee shirt that says “The current government is what our founding fathers tried to prevent”. When I wear it, I get favorable comments no matter where I am. America is hungry for relief from bureaucracy.

Now, you all have heard the problems---you have heard the sad news of ever creeping nationalism. What is the solution? You know what it is. It is to have your local governments stand up to the federal and state bureaucrats, take their rightful place in the development of policy and management of their natural resources, and make the Tenth Amendment’s provisions LIVE AGAIN.

My 76 years, my fifty years in the practice of law----working for, with and against the federal government---have convinced me of several premises: there is no longer any hope that Congress will change course, no matter which party controls---Congress is broken;

                There is no longer any hope that the executive administration agencies will change course, no matter which party controls the White House----the change from Clinton to Bush didn’t help, because the bureaucrats protected by civil service are entrenched and their livelihoods depend on continued dominance;

                There is no longer any hope that the Supreme Court will change course, no matter whether conservatives have the 5-4 edge----too much precedence has been set for the Court to completely enforce Tenth Amendment authority;

                There is no longer any hope that state governments will change course, no matter who controls the statehouses----they have become too dependent on federal money with entangling strings, and they have become too dominated by metropolitan urban areas (an example being the redistricting program in California controlled by southern California cities).

But there is hope at the local government level. There is hope as long as local Sheriffs and Supervisors and small towns and service districts and even non-governmental organizations support agricultural and natural resource economies will step forward and exercise the authority granted them by the Tenth Amendment and by federal and state statutes which provide the “coordination” power.

I urge all of you to follow the words of Sir Winston Churchill to Englanders in the darkest hours of the blitzkrieg in 1941:

                “Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never – in nothing, great or small, large or petty – never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense”.

Support your Sheriffs and supervisors and all local officials who are willing to follow these words----who are willing to stand tall against overwhelming force of a huge federal and state regulatory onslaught.

The only way we can lose our God-given, constitution re-enforced, rights is by giving in, by giving up!! The Sheriffs who are here today have not given in, they have no intention of giving in. Stand with them. Support them. Your children and grandchildren depend on you to preserve for them the American way of life that you knew as children. Don’t let them down.

Say to the bureaucrats, again, what President Kennedy said just three years prior to assassination:

                “We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans—born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage—and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.”

As you move forward with the Sheriffs, through your tea party organizations, your central committee activities, your service clubs, your school and church organizations, and as individuals keep in mind the admonition to us all by John Fitzgerald Kennedy:  “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”

Do this for your country:  Step up as Americans with your Sheriffs to say to the bureaucratic powers:  “We will not be intimidated, we will take back the America that we knew and loved.”

God Bless all of you. God Bless these proactive Sheriffs. God Bess America.

Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns

"Complete disarmament" of the American people
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, July 16, 2012
The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee "complete disarmament" of the American people under the ruse of preventing war. The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target "all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons," according to Forbes' Larry Bell.
Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement "is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control."
A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the "fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms". The letter adds that "...the U.N.'s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights."
Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and "international crime syndicates," the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.
This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a "Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World."
Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a "United Nations Peace Force" that would "enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds."
While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, "for the purpose of maintaining internal order," and the UN "peacekeeping" force itself, which would require "agreed manpower."
"The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes," states the document. While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet's supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.
As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish -- taking a huge bite out of the second amendment -- is by no means far fetched.
After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.

What price would YOU pay for freedom?

FOR GREATER GLORY is a new movie with Andy Garcia that shows what happens when governments trample on basic God given rights, especially when those persecuted are put to death precisely because they are Christians.
Watch the movie trailer here: 
http://www.fandango.com/movie-trailer/forgreaterglory-trailer/152952/2213421435

And here are interviews of the real Cristeros fighters much later when they are old and remember their days in the service of God.
 http://es.gloria.tv/?media=8121%3Fstoryid%3D14796


Their battle cry was "Viva Cristo Rey",    Long Live Christ the King


Here is the story by wikipedia     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cristero_War


Here is the battle hymn of the Cristeros

The Virgin Mary is protector and defender against that we fear

She will vanquish demons with a cry of "Long live Christ King!" (x2)

Soldiers of Christ, let us follow this flag, for its cross points to the army of God

Let us follow the flag and declare, "Long live Christ King!"

Collapse Within Weeks, Ron Paul Presidency? - Bix Weir - Video




http://beforeitsnews.com/story/2396/045/COLLAPSE_Within_WEEKS,_RON_PAUL_PRESIDENCY_-_Bix_Weir_-_Video.html

Melt the witch. Buy physical silver. Keep it in your posession.

http://www.teapartysilver.com

Get Out - Patriot Super PAC

Backscatter radiation vans destroy privacy

Here is the real story on vans containing backscatter radar surveillance of your home, car, family or anything else they want to know. If you see one of these cruising by what are you going to do about it?





EPA Using Drones to Spy on Cattle Ranchers in Nebraska and Iowa

http://www.infowars.com/epa-using-drones-to-spy-on-cattle-ranchers-in-nebraska-and-iowa/


Here is the link to 14 different technologies being used to violate your privacy.
 
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/14-incredibly-creepy-surveillance-technologies-that-big-brother-will-soon-be-using-to-spy-on-you?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=14-incredibly-creepy-surveillance-technologies-that-big-brother-will-soon-be-using-to-spy-on-you


And here is the video that exposes the NSA by a former NSA official!

Here is a REAL SHERIFF doing his duty!

This is what a real constitutional sheriff and true Peace Officer looks like.

Ben Stormes had the opportunity hear Sheriff Jon Lorey speak recently at the national Sheriffs’ Conference in Las Vegas.  He personally relates to the following message pertaining the federally mandated “coordination process”  in dealing with our ever increasing water issues as well as ongoing problems with U.S. Forest Service mismanagement of forests.  We, here in Montana need to pay heed to the experiences of Northern California and the manner in which citizens and their elected officials have taken a strong stand, fighting for the rights and livelihoods of citizens who are being undermined by rampantly intrusive government policies, propagandized news media and misinformed, agenda driven environmental organizations. 

Thank you, Fred Grant, for this very informative article.  I hope it gets wide distribution, readership and application, especially as we here in Montana become increasingly in need of it.  Montanans will be depending upon on our County Commissioners and Sheriffs to utilize “coordination” in dealing with federal agencies to provide policies essential to a healthy economy and way of life.

Clarice

JON LOPEY, SHERIFF OF SISKIYOU COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, KNOWS WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A SHERIFF.  HE REPRESENTS THE OLD SCHOOL OF SHERIFFS----THOSE WHO SERVED AS LEADER OF THE PEOPLE’S INTERESTS AND RIGHTS.

July 13, 2012-------------by Fred Kelly Grant

On July 2, Glen Martin wrote and published a post in the Huffington Post viciously attacking Sheriff Jon Lopey of Siskiyou County, in northern California.  Martin accused Lopey of misrepresentation, using “incendiary rhetoric”, overstepping his authority “to an alarming degree”, and apparently coveting the title of “Emperor of Northern California”.

Martin, an environmentalist writer called his assault “Above the Law”.   He is probably protected from the laws of slander and libel because the good Sheriff would now be considered a “public personality”.  Otherwise, Martin would be at the precipice of having gone overboard as to the truth.  Ironically, the post was published on the 2^nd of July----because the independence that emanated from the Resolution signed on that day allows and protects freedom of speech.  As well as I know Sheriff Lopey, I know that he would not object to Palmer’s right to speak freely, even if inaccurately, and neither do I.  What I object to is that such a formidable site as Huffington Post would publish such a story, with no chance for rebuttal being offered to the elected official attacked.

That fact demonstrates the danger of the internet, e.g., it allows publication of articles that have no semblance of truth, that have been written without any effort to learn the truth or written inaccurately with full knowledge of the truth.  But, the Martin article also points out the awesome power of the internet, because it offers the medium for responding with the truth.

During the past two decades of work in helping local governments and elected officials use the “coordination” authority granted to them in federal laws passed by Congress, I  have many times been counseled to ignore attacks like Martin’s.   My friends, often wiser than I am in matters of political niceties, have contended that responses only prolong the impact of the attacks.  But, in my old age, as I settle into retirement, I have decided to ignore that sage advice.  I believe it is important to tell the public about the authority their local officials have to protect them against federal and state agency over-reach.  The knowledge of “coordination” has helped wherever the process is used.  If more people knew about it, understood it, and worked through organizations like Trademark America, the power of DC based agencies would diminish.

So, I choose to respond to Mr. Martin, and I hope that local officials and citizens who have benefited from local government exercise of “coordination” will also respond---with factual articles that help the general public understand that there is a way to diminish the awesome power that has been built up by the agencies themselves.

Sheriff Jon Lopey knows and understands the United States and California Constitutions.  He understands the position of a sworn County Sheriff in California as the chief law enforcement officer for his jurisdiction.  He knows that the primary duty of the Sheriff is to keep the peace, a peace that can be threatened when federal and state agencies take or infringe on private property rights, particularly when the exercise of those rights control whether or not a person can provide for himself or his family.

He knows also that the revenue base of the County has to remain strong if he is to have the funds needed to keep the peace and perform all other duties assigned him by law.   The plans and management actions of the environmental and natural resource agencies greatly affect the County’s revenue base and economic stability.  So, it is certainly within the Sheriff’s duties to help the County’s citizens protect their property rights, the exercise of which keeps them economically capable of paying their ad valorem taxes that produce revenue needed to provide vital County services.

Congress has recognized the importance of the Sheriff’s duties, and has directed federal agencies to “coordinate” with them.   Congress defined the term “coordinate” in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, 43 USC 1712, by directing the Secretary of Interior to “coordinate” with local elected officials to resolve inconsistencies between federal and county operations.   The National Forest Management Act requires coordination by Forest Service with the Sheriff; the National Environmental Policy Act requires the same during all NEPA planning and studying.

The legislative history of FLPMA shows clearly that Congress recognized the adverse impact on a County’s revenue base that would result from the monstrous number of federally non-taxed acres in western counties, and from management actions of the federal agencies that manage those federal acres.  Congress thus mandated that federal agencies and personnel work closely with local officials to insure consistency of policy and management.   The method through which this close work is to be performed is “coordination”.

Moreover,  the agencies themselves understand the burden placed on them by Congress.  The Bureau of Land Management, the Forest Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Corps of Engineers, the Highway Administration, the Department of Transportation and the Department of Justice all have issued regulations or planning rules setting forth how their personnel must coordinate with Sheriffs throughout the nation.

FLPMA has been interpreted and applied by the federal court in Utah where the Court set aside a Bureau of Land Management plan that was not consistent with the County plan.  The National Forest Management Act has been interpreted and applied in the federal district court for the Northern District of California where the court set aside a Forest Service plan that was not consistent with a state policy as to providing roadless areas in the national forests.   A California state appellate court has ruled that the “coordination” process means and demands far more than mere cooperation and working together.  It means, according to the court, that local officials have a meaningful role in the planning and management process and that federal officials must attempt to reach a mutually acceptable result.

Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama have issued Executive Orders directing all federal agencies to coordinate with local officials in the spirit of federalism that is required by the United States Constitution, particularly the Tenth Amendment.   I have not read any other of Mr. Martin’s writings which, according to his bio, have appeared in Audubon, National Wildlife, The Nature Conservancy Magazine, Sierra, Outside, Trout, Discover, Wired, and Men’s Journal.  But, based on my experiences of the last fifty years, my bet would be that he is not a fan of either federalism or the Tenth Amendment which Sheriff Lopey understands fully.

California’s legislature has also passed over twenty statutes that require California agencies such as the Fish and Game Department to “coordinate” with the Sheriff.  I have not seen the letter from the Fish and Game Director to which Martin refers, but if it says what Martin attributes to it, the Director really needs to bone up on California law, as well as federal laws that apply to him

Martin obviously understands none of the above.   He wrote without even researching the laws forming the base for Sheriff Lopey’s actions and words.  Or, he intentionally ignored the truth.   Had Martin even  one iota of concern for the truth, he would have talked with Sheriff Lopey before accusing him of mis-using his position to gain personal esteem.

Martin attacks the Sheriff because of his opposition to the Klamath Agreement, knowing that most of his readers will not know the mischief that is inherent in that Agreement that calls for destruction of dams on the Klamath River, at least one of which is generating useful electricity that serves most of Siskiyou County.    Putting aside the illegality of the Agreement (It was negotiated and settled in violation of California’s open meeting law), I move to Martin’s suggestion that destruction of the dams will restore to the Klamath “its once-mighty salmon runs.”  What Martin does not tell his readers is that dam destruction will not save the salmon.  It makes no provision for neutralizing the silt behind the dams, silt that contains heavy metal materials that are toxic to fish. 

When dams were destroyed on the Rogue River in Oregon, the heavy metals from the silt killed all the fish in the river, salmon included.  A year ago, Sheriff Gil Gilbertson took me to the River in Grants Pass where a mining expert demonstrated the black, sticky “glunk” of heavy metals that he could pick out of the water with a magnet----analysis showed that it contained more than the amount of some toxins than would be permitted by federal agencies if a private company deposited them.  The environmental study for the Klamath destruction ignored these facts in the agency’s analysis of impacts from destruction of dams.

The federal government’s own “independent” study and analysis acknowledged that it is only speculative that destruction of the dams will help salmon recovery. When the dams are destroyed, that silt will be moved so far through the countryside that it will almost assuredly affect coastal ports.  It will move so slowly that it will take years and years to settle out, destroying valuable land, wet lands and waterways as it does.   

Even with that environmental destruction assured, environmental organizations support destruction.  The groups for which Martin writes stand ready to cash in on $93 MILLION a year authorized by the Agreement in grants to environmental organizations for salmon projects FOR YEARS FOLLOWING DESTRUCTION.    Amazing that the Administration cannot determine how to stabilize social security and medicare, but can consider such massive expenditures. 

Sheriff Lopey has the obligation to question the Agreement and its implementation.  The economic loss to ranchers who will lose at least one harvest if irrigation storage is lost will have a huge effect on  the economy of the County, and that will have a huge effect on the funds available to the Sheriff to fund keeping of the peace.  Moreover, if the destruction results in economic loss from water loss, the Sheriff will have the duty to keep the peace among people desperate for water.

The Siskiyou County Supervisors, sharing Sheriff Lopey’s concerns about the County’s citizens,  used their “coordination” authority to advise the Secretary of Interior that he had not complied with the law requiring him to “coordinate” with them and take into proper consideration the economic and environmental effects of the dam destruction.  They and the County Attorney were prepared to file a lawsuit to prevent destruction on the grounds, among others, that Congress had never authorized such action on the Klamath River.  At the very time that Supervisors were in Washington DC with representatives of Trademark America Foundation to discuss the Secretary’s action, he backed away, announcing that he would await Congressional authority.  Had it not been for Siskiyou’s elected officials engaging the Secretary’s department through the “coordination” authority, the Secretary’s order would no doubt already have been issued.

Sheriff Lopey is rightfully concerned about his citizens’ losing their water rights because that loss constitutes a deprival of a private property interest.  It is deprivation of a civil right which the United States Supreme Court has held to be one of the most critical to our ordered society.  Martin cautions that the water rights of the Yurok and Karuk Indians “likely supersede those of the ranchers” along the Klamath.    The active word is “likely” because Martin does not know the status of any such rights.   Moreover, Martin ignores the fact that even if their rights “supersede”, the term “supersede” does not equate to “destroy all secondary” water rights.   The Agreement will ultimately deprive ranchers, farmers and municipal populations of water rights----and without the compensation that is required by both the California and United States Constitutions.

Martin also attacks the Sheriff for his efforts to see that logging resumes in Siskiyou County.  Martin says, inaccurately, that there is no viable logging left because the forests were clear cut long ago.  He uses his work in the Forest Service and information from the “70s” as his source.  If Martin is as active with environmental groups as his writing would suggest, he knows this is a completely false statement.   This is 2012, the forests are in sick and dying condition today, not from over-logging, but because of lawsuits and disruptions of logging caused by some of  those for whom Martin writes.  The Forest Service for which he worked even acknowledges that logging is critical today to return forest health.   But obstructionist environmental organizations still work to prevent logging at the risk of seeing the forests die.  Siskiyou County, as others throughout the northwest know that if they had the management decisions for even a portion of the Forests, they could let contracts that would put people back to work, and reduce federal expenditures that are being made in lieu of former logging receipts.  Sheriff Lopey knows this, and it is his duty as the elected law enforcement representative of the County’s citizens to push the agencies toward getting past the environmentalist obstructionism.

Jon Lopey stands tall along with several other California sheriffs who have determined that they will exercise the authority granted them by federal and California law.  Those grants of authority are consistent with the Tenth Amendment’s reservations of sovereign authority of states and local governments in matters related to the “police powers”, that is, those powers necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare.    I am proud to have worked with him.  He serves his citizens well, and is the kind of Sheriff every county deserves.

Obamacare: Nullification, equal protection and important court cases

There's all kinds of political posturing going on from career GOP politicians in the Outlaw Congress. There will be a ceremonial vote this week by the House. Unfortunately, the unlawfully seated Senate is not going to vote to repeal it and even if they did, the impostor in the White House will never sign it. All just another circus. Since Soetoro/Obama was ineligible to run for president in 2008, he never had the legal authority to sign the 2700 page bill into law in the first place......
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd542.htm
by Devvy Kidd

LIBOR scandal and silver will end the bankster cabal

Biggest bankster scandal in history!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oV2mI0IYp8

What is LIBOR?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CI2M1olG2Oo&feature=player_embedded
Watch this video to understand the largest banking corruption scandal in history. These large banks have stolen money from every single human on the planet. Not one person was left out. Not even YOU! Now that it is exposed there is no going back. We will ALL support the "NO MORE BAILOUT" mantra...


This one will not go away. It was not planned to go away like other "banking scandals". This one will build and build and build until it is known by every man, woman and child on the planet. This is the exposure that will END the bad guys reign.

I've said it over and over: Timing, timing, timing.

The evil vampire banksters have been stabbed in the heart with various stakes in the past few months but this one is by far the largest. (note: the last one will be made of SILVER so be ready for it!)
http://www.roadtoroota.com/public/570.cfm?awt_l=Hj.JM&awt_m=3aquxoPW7V4C85B

Know this: All is going as planned for the Good Guys.

May the Road you choose be the Right Road.

Bix Weir

http://www.roadtoroota.com/

Get your silver here:  http://www.teapartysilver.com

Is someone inside Montana's GOP secretly working for the Democrats?

I will add my own comments below this well written article by Gary Marbut. I was there as a delegate also, and I can say with no reservation that he is telling it exactly like it is.
Paul

Another attempt to clarify the outcome of the Montana GOP Nomination Convention


Probably for reasons of pride and control, the establishment Republicans, without thinking through the consequences, may have thrown the major Montana GOP candidates under the political bus.

Dear Friends,

I have encountered a number of friends and acquaintances who just don't grasp the reasons for and consequences of the 2012 Montana Republican National Delegate Nominating Convention in Missoula.

This is another attempt to explain the convention and its consequences. As I explain below, my intent is to promote the very best election chances for Denny Rehberg, Steve Daines, Rick Hill, Tim Fox, Brad Johnson, Sandy Welch and Derek Skees. So they will understand this too, I encourage you to forward this email to those candidates.

This is now posted as an addition to the bottom of the page at:

http://www.marbut.com/GOPReport

First, it is essential to understand the psychology and attitude of the Ron Paul supporters attending the convention. These people, who comprised about 47% of the voting strength of the convention have been, up until the convention, the most energized Republicans in Montana. They have been energized by Congressman Ron Paul's message.

THIS IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND. These people known by the label of "Ron Paul supporters" are less energized by the man than they are by his message of individual liberty and constitutional government. Most of these delegates to the convention had pretty much given up hope that Ron Paul could or would become the Republican nominee for President. Yet they continued to pursue the dream and ideals of individual liberty and constitutional (limited) government.

So, to focus this explanation, let's re-name these delegates from "Ron Paul delegates" to "liberty-minded delegates (or "liberty delegates" for short)." This will help the reader to understand the outcome of the convention. The liberty delegates had a common dream of taking their message of liberty to the national level, including to the Platform Convention in Tampa.

No honest person will deny that the process and ballot of the Montana GOP convention was engineered to elect ALL Romney delegates to Tampa, to entirely shut out the liberty delegates. The process was not fair or inclusive (see Website).

For want of a better term to identify those who engineered, allowed or supported this unfair process, I will refer to them as "establishment Republicans."

Some will argue that everything done at the convention was done by the rules, and that the liberty delegates had the democratic (bad word) opportunity to make and support motions to correct the process, and simply failed. That argument is both correct and wrong. It is wrong because it is an attempt to divert the discussion from an important point that must be recognized to actually understand the impact of the convention outcome.

In politics it is admitted that "perception is reality." Anyone who truly wishes to understand the convention impact must be open to hear how the power play by the Republican establishment struck the liberty delegates. What the liberty delegates PERCEIVED from the engineered shutout was that the Montana Republican establishment opposes the liberty delegates' ideals individual liberty and constitutional government.

This is important, so please tolerate my reiteration of this point. What the liberty delegates PERCEIVED from the engineered shutout was that the Montana Republican establishment opposes the liberty delegates' ideals individual liberty and constitutional government.

Whether this was intended or unintended, correct or incorrect, right or wrong, it is a crystal clear summary of how the liberty delegates PERCEIVED the engineered shutout of themselves and their ideals. It is the reality.

Some say, hey, "They should just get over it." Saying that simply won't make it so. They won't.

Others say, "We don't need them anyway. Good riddance."

This gets me to an explanation of why the engineered shutout was such a colossal tactical blunder.

First, understand that if five, ten, or all twenty elected Montana delegates had been liberty delegates, it would make ZERO difference in the outcome in Tampa. That is, the engineered shutout was done for no tactical benefit.

Second, it is helpful for the reader to understand the perception by the liberty delegates of the difference between "At-large" delegate slots and "Alternate" delegate slots. Almost universally, the liberty delegates are not wealthy. Faced with the $3,500 cost of attending the Tampa convention, they would have begged, borrowed and broken open every piggy bank to afford the trip as an at-large delegate. They would NOT have made that sacrifice to be an alternate - to just go to Tampa to party, watch, and sit powerless on the sidelines. Whether the reader agrees or not, and whether the reader likes it or not, the liberty delegates had no desire to be elected as Alternates. None.

Third, don't forget that the liberty delegates were so energized that they worked hard enough, and long enough, to deliver 47% of the voting strength of the convention. That is, they are (or were) clearly the most energized subset of Montana's GOP.

Having been back-handed in the face (how they perceived it) by the Republican establishment in rejection of their ideals of individual liberty and constitutional government (how they perceived it), these people are now VERY demoralized. Their enthusiasm for the GOP is gone.

That is the important point, NOT whether they will show up at the polls this November. They will go to the polls, although about 1/4 of them I believe will vote for third-party candidates. Hey, don't blame me. These people were rejected by the Republican establishment, not me. The remaining 3/4 of them will cast ballots, and for Republican candidates, although many will hold their noses when they do.

Whether or not or how they vote is not important. They are numerically a small group.

The elephant in the room is this. Having been so thoroughly demoralized and rejected by the establishment Republicans, they will fail to volunteer their unique and considerable energies to aiding the seven major Montana GOP candidates, Denny Rehberg, Steve Daines, Rick Hill, Tim Fox, Brad Johnson, Sandy Welch, and Derek Skees. And, their many circles of influence will encompass a LOT of Montana voters.

The absence of the enthusiastic support of the energized liberty delegates and the ripple effect through all of their friends and associates will cost these major candidates some percentage of the General Election vote. Given the likely close races all of these major candidates face, they simply cannot afford to have had the thoughtless establishment Republicans flush percentages of vote down the drain, especially for no tactical benefit.

So, the liberty delegates and their ideals were rejected by establishment Republicans, for no benefit, and at considerable downstream expense to Montana's major GOP candidates. Probably for reasons of pride and control, the establishment Republicans, without thinking through the consequences, may have thrown the major GOP candidates under the political bus.

THAT, is the final result of the Montana Republican Nomination Convention.

A mistake was made, a serious tactical mistake.

Is there any possibility of recovering from this mistake? Yes, but the practical doability of a recovery recedes each day that the establishment Republicans continue to circle their wagons in response to this fiasco.

In historic classical terms, when one person injures another, there are three steps to fixing that mistake. Those injured are primarily the liberty delegates to the convention, and their friends and associates, and secondarily the seven major Montana GOP candidates. These recovery steps are much the same in all major religions, and other moral structures. A person or persons injuring another must:

1) Admit clearly that the person made a mistake;
2) Apologize for the injury delivered (a serious apology, not some whiny 10% apology, delivered to the injured party or parties); and
3) Make an absolute best effort at restitution.

To do this will require the Montana Republican establishment to swallow some pride. It remains to be seen whether pride is more important to the establishment Republicans than the success of the seven major candidates this November.

I predict that the establishment Republicans will choose to tighten the circle of their wagons, make excuses, or at very best, attempt some half-hearted atonement for their poor and tactically-unsound behavior.

However, and for the record, I would dearly love to be proven wrong. I would FAR prefer those who made the mistake to fix their mistake. I would FAR prefer to see the establishment genuinely reach out to the liberty-minded Republicans of Montana - to actually BE inclusive and walk the walk of the "Big Tent." I would FAR prefer to see the seven major candidates sail to victory this November with the energized and enthusiastic help of the liberty-minded Republicans of Montana.

I dread the alternative, but I'm not holding my breath expecting any serious effort of establishment Republicans to correct the huge error made at the convention.

I hope this helps clarify this picture for some who have not understood.

Sincerely,

Gary Marbut
Republican Convention Delegate
Republican Candidate, House District 99

P.S., If I were any of the seven major candidates, I'd rally the others to take the establishment Republicans to the woodshed over correcting this dreadful mistake.

Also see the Massachusetts GOP experience:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzyGtc61Ph8

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

All of this begs the question - Has the Republican GOP been secretly taken over by Democrats calling themselves Republicans. Hey, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck..................
We see this at the national level in the GOP big time. This is exactly the reason so many people are supporting Ron Paul. He is not a politician, but a statesman. He does exactly what he says. Over and over he has voted ALONE for freedom and liberty, while the others around him sold us out.
The Republican old establishment could not have picked a better way to alienate the only people in the state who actually get it, and have some solutions for restoring America.  They prefer the status quo, the big money, the power, the fame. They are drunk with power and will take down the ship rather than give it up.
After this kind of insulting behavior I really don't see any way they can redeem themselves in the eyes of the people who gave their best efforts and were willing to promote the whole Republican slate if they would have been given just  a few delelgates.  Come on old guard "Republicans"  Surprise us with some incredible acts of humility now. Here is your opportunity to build "unity" in your party.

Here is some additional evidence from others at the convention.

http://jeffwhiteside.com/2012/06/17/montana-state-republican-convention-the-fracturing-of-the-mtgop/

http://dougwead.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/montana-madness-gop-establishment-shuts-out-ron-paul-supporters/

Paul Stramer
Lincoln County Republican State Committeeman (twice elected unanimously by the Lincoln County Republican central committee)
Member of the Montana State Republican Central Committee
Montana Republican Platform Committee
Montana Delegate to the State presidential convention from Lincoln County

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Mitt Romney is a criminal says lawsuit

Romney CAUGHT CHEATING - Campaign Over - Paul vs. Obama



Lawyers for Ron Paul: Our Legal Position is Well Founded. Romney Camp Has Organized Criminal Acts

http://libertycrier.com/politics/lawyers-for-ron-paul-our-legal-position-is-well-founded-romney-camp-has-organized-criminal-acts/

Ron Paul Campaign has $3.3 Million on Hand: What is in Store for the Convention

http://www.examiner.com/article/ron-paul-campaign-has-3-3-million-on-hand-whats-store-for-the-convention?cid=db_articles

Solutions for Out of Control Government

Hero general: Obama following Castro's plan


http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/hero-general-obama-following-castros-plan/

The problem with most who know the real situation is that they usually don't offer any real workable solutions.

This article shows how at least one military man gets it, but what about all the others, both civilian and military who don't have a clue how to turn this around, even though they might have a pretty good idea about what is wrong?

Asking congressmen to fix this is like asking the fox who is guarding the hen house if you can have one of "his" hens for dinner. What do you think the answer will be? I am so sick and tired of begging the people who are causing the problem to correct their own flaws. It simply doesn't work. It never has throughout history. The only thing that works is force. It's the only thing government understands. Force does not necessarily mean violence.

In the case of the out of control corporation called THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA all caps, force would be the States nullifying the so called laws that are outside the Constitution for the United States of America, (not all caps).

If you are wondering what difference capital letters makes, watch this:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/06/united-states.html

In the case of out of control government agencies raiding private sector businesses and individuals in the various states force would be the local county commissions and sheriffs putting their foot down and upholding their oath of office to obey, defend, and uphold the Constitution for the United States of America (not all caps).

http://www.sheriffmack.com/ and http://www.cspoa.org/

In the case of Obama Care force would be the state attorney general making a ruling that no provisions of Obama Care will be enforced in his state, or it could be the state legislature passing a bill specifically nullifying the provisions as in North Dakota, who's governor recently signed a bill to that effect.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl/nullification-obama-care.html
http://www.infowars.com/north-dakota-governor-signs-obamacare-nullification-bill/

Force could also be the States telling the Supreme Court to go take a hike, and that they are NOT the final authority on what the Constitution means, which seems to be what is happening right now. Since the states created the federal government, the states can and do have the power to change it. The process is spelled out right in the document.

Then there are the compacts under which some of the states became states in the first place. An example is Montana and the gun rights provisions in our contract at the beginning of our statehood.

Read the Mack/Printz decision for more information on the equal and separate jurisdiction, or sphere of the states.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1478.ZO.html

THERE ARE MANY REAL SOLUTIONS. The problem really is not a lack of solutions. The problem is the lack of understanding by the people who are in local and state offices. The last Republican convention in Missoula made that stand out like a sore thumb.

"MY PEOPLE PERISH FOR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE"

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/06/holding-republican-feet-to-fire.html

As a part of my business model I am a vendor at around 20 gun shows in Montana every year. I see many people from all walks of life buying guns and loads of ammo, some of whom never owned a gun before. When I ask them why, they invariably cite the situation in our country, and that they want to be prepared. When I ask them for what, some will tell me precisely what they think will happen, but most won't be able to put their finger on a specific situation, and will say something like "for self defense".

What seems to really bother people the most are out of control federal agencies raiding individuals and businesses with jack booted, black suited thugs with white letters on their backs, for some trumped up charges or violations of perfectly lawful activity which was supposedly outlawed by the stroke of some government agent's pen. In other words lots of people realize that government bureaucrats are deliberately trying to make criminals out of law abiding people as an excuse to get them out of their way, and to solidify their own jobs and paychecks. See this example.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/07/unlawful-raid-by-jack-booted-thugs.html

What can be done about these unlawful raids which violate several of the Bill of Rights in the organic Constitution including the 4th Amendment?

Your sheriff of your county has the power to stop these raids cold in their tracks. If he doesn't know how and wants the learn his true power send him to this website, and urge him to attend the upcoming convention of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association in Las Vegas in September.

http://www.cspoa.org/

If he doesn't want to learn to keep his oath and earn his paycheck, then find a candidate to run against him, and fire him. This is very doable on the local county level. The least you will accomplish is to wake up lots of local people, and get them familiar with these issues. That could come in real handy when it's your turn to be raided. MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THIS. If you love freedom and the America we were given by the founders, THEY JUST HAVEN'T GOT AROUND TO YOU YET! They will keep signing "regulations" and publishing them in the federal register (supposedly law for us to follow, but not law at all) until they have something that applies to you, and will use that as an excuse to send their thugs to your door.

If you think you can escape them by not standing up, or by hiding in the woods, you are kidding yourself. So if that is what you intend, then you really only have the force of violence left. Do you think you can actually WIN THAT WAY? I don't. There are really only two choices you can make personally that make any sense. One is to hide and hope to win when they come, the other is to get as high profile as you can and tell the truth to as many as possible ahead of time so like with Ron Paul, they don't really want to make a martyr out of you. If enough people do that we can still win this.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/09/when-is-it-time-to-fight.html

It takes real and deep faith in God and His Divine Providence to stand up, but that is the only thing that will save this country. The solutions are in the links above, but not enough people know about them. Will you help to spread this article all around the country, and really do something for your freedom and liberty? Will you depend on God's providence, and let the chips fall where they may? Beg God for mercy for our country every day, and do penance for your sins, and maybe God will do as he did when Jonah preached in Nineveh and they listened and God spared their city.

http://www.paulstramer.net/2010/11/out-of-hands-of-nations-deliver-us-o.html

Paul Stramer

Lincoln County Republican State Committeeman (twice elected unanimously by the Lincoln County Republican central committee)
Member of the Montana State Republican Central Committee
Montana Republican Platform Committee
Montana Delegate to the State presidential convention from Lincoln County
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Unlawful raid by jack booted thugs?

FDA Targets Family Man In Attempt to Stop MMS

On June 29, 2011, armed agents of the Food and Drug Administration raided Smith’s home in Spokane Washington, as well as two Spokane companies that bottled and shipped products for Smith’s association. According to Smith, “They completely wiped us out in a single day. They took everything… computers, phones, records, product, equipment, and seized every penny from every bank account - it was a calculated operation.” Smith had seen enough to know he was fighting a well organized......
http://www.newswithviews.com/Snook/edward104.htm
 
by Ed Snook

This is what really should scare hell out of you. These raids happen all over this country over 50,000 times per year.
This has to stop. The only way to stop this criminal activity by jack booted, black suited thugs with white letters on their back is to get your local sheriff to grow a backbone or throw him out and get a sheriff that will protect you. The county commission should sit the sheriff down and have a little talk about his budget, and then invite him formally to go learn how to keep his oath.
http://www.sheriffmack.com/
http://www.cspoa.org/

If you don't get active about your local county commission and your local sheriff keeping their oath of office then you deserve what you get.

Paul Stramer
If you don't get active about your local county commission and your local sheriff keeping their oath of office then you deserve what you get.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice. ©

Nullification the answer to Obama Care?

Reply to Gary Marbut  on his take on the ObamaCare decision. See his article below.

Not a bad outcome?   Maybe if you want to play political games for the rest of your natural life.

I for one will not be satisfied until the Federal Corporation shadow government is disbanded by the states and replaced with the organic constitutional government we had at the beginning of our country.

ENOUGH of this deception. It's time to tell the whole truth about how we have been lied to our entire lives about the structure of our country.

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/06/united-states.html

Not a bad outcome you say?  How long do you want to be in this position of always playing second fiddle to an unlawful corporate "Supreme Court" that passes itself off as some kind of final authority on the constitution? NOT ME. Not by a long shot.

The STATES have final authority, and can NULLIFY the decision. The states can throw out the entire Obama Care fiasco by one simple act of declaring state sovereignty and simply refusing to allow any of it's provisions to apply to the living inhabitants within that state's borders.

NULLIFICATION is the answer. The governors of each State need to grow a backbone, or get the hell out of the way so the sheriff's of each county can arrest the IRS agents who come to collect the "tax".

Just like always the Supreme Court passes the buck. So the big lie continues. That lie is "if you don't like it vote them out".

Gee Gary, I would have thought that with what happened in Missoula you would have had enough of the big lie.

The supremes passed that buck back to US, so what are we going to do about it?

THE FOUNDERS WOULD HAVE BEEN DONE BY NOW!

Paul Stramer
SLC Distributing
PO Box 116
Eureka MT 59917
800 889 2839pstramer@eurekadsl.net 

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced  The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice. ©

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Marbut-MSSA" <mssa@mtssa.org>
To: <mssa@mtssa.org>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 10:09 AM
Subject: My take on the USSC's Obamacare ruling


> Dear MSSA Friends,
>
> There's been a lot of electronic chatter about the USSC's Obamacare
> decision, including many comments about what an evil guy Chief
> Justice Roberts is.  Here is my take on the decision, for what it's worth.
>
> I believe Chief Justice Roberts is more wise than many are giving him
> credit for.  I suspect there was a deal understood among the five
> conservative justices to throw a political hand grenade into the
> upcoming November elections.
>
> To accomplish that, it would be necessary for one of the five
> conservatives to vote with the four liberals to "uphold" (but not
> exactly) Obamacare.  Roberts was the volunteer, but he cut a strong
> deal with the liberals in the process.  The deal was that he would
> write the decision, that the decision would slam the door on creating
> yet another expansion of Congress's Interstate Commerce Clause Power
> to regulate Americans, and that Obamacare would be clearly defined as
> a tax (not a regulatory effort).
>
> In construing Obamacare as a tax, Roberts availed himself of a great
> opportunity to educate the voters of America.  He warned voters that
> it is not the job of the Supreme Court to protect voters from the
> folly of electing bad people to Congress or the Oval Office.  What
> Roberts didn't say overtly, but is within the message of the
> decision, it:  "You voters really screwed up when you voted to elect
> a bunch of power mongers to Congress and the White House.  You have
> the chance to do better this coming November."
>
> So now the largest tax increase in American history is the dead
> Albatross hanging around the neck of a lot of incumbent politicians
> who pushed Obamacare through Congress.  That will be a huge liability
> for them in November, an especially good campaign tool for those
> opposed to this huge tax and running against the incumbents, if the
> challengers exploit the issue well.  Further, a wooden stake is
> driven through the heart of the theory that Congress may force people
> to buy stuff they don't want under the guise of regulating commerce
> among the states.
>
> Finally, because Obamacare is now clearly defined as a tax, it makes
> yet again a grand liar out of Obama, it raises the pressure for
> Congress to repeal the entire package, AND it practically limits the
> penalties for those who don't go along.
>
> Not a bad outcome.
>
> Gary Marbut, president
> Montana Shooting Sports Association
> http://www.mtssa.org/
> author, Gun Laws of Montana
> http://www.mtpublish.com/

The UNITED STATES CORPORATION

The Act of 1871- The American Scam Revealed

Stephen Sindoni puts the spotlight on social injustice in the video entitled "The Act of 1871." This broadcast should make you mad as hell. It's time to Wake Up America!

THIS IS TREASON

The shadow government corporation disallowed all rights of sovereignty. Courts uphold the fiction.

This is how the Supreme Court gets away with declaring Obamacare constitutional.

In any really fair and impartial court of common law these acts would be deemed to be unilateral.
That is, it would have been declared to be null and void because it was done by fraud, deceit, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, and therefore before God and the Supreme Law it would be thrown out and without force and effect. The contract would be deemed null and void precisely because it was done to the people without full knowledge and because the true meaning of the act was deliberately hidden from us who were supposed to be part of the contract. BEFORE GOD ALMIGHTY these acts are null and void. They should be null and void before the people also.

And don't give me the argument that we volunteered. Those signatures were done without knowledge or full consent, which in God's eyes invalidates the act of compliance. In other words WE WERE LIED TO. We were told all the while we were in school and are still told by those who are supposed to be in office that we are FREE and can still effect change by VOTING. That is the Big Lie that keeps people from taking back their Sovereignty.  Contracts where one of the parties lies to the other about provisions of the contract are NULL AND VOID. Any fair and impartial court would so rule. The fact that the congress did this without our consent is the Treason where they sold out our original organic United States Constitution.

All of us, were not even alive when these traitors sold us down the river. How can we be held to a non-existent contract which was signed in a treasonous congress by people who were supposed to be representing our rights before God, and had sold out. THESE WERE TRAITORS we are talking about here. They had NO authority to abrogate the organic United States Constitution, in favor of a UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, the corporation. Because they had no authority to do this before God, the act was a scam and null and void. We should treat it as such.

So what is left for us to do? Educate everyone you know about this fraud. Send this post to everyone in the country. Our society is about to melt down into anarchy. It is important that we don't end up with something worse because the people don't understand who they are supposed to be. The founding documents and ideas of this country are what needs to be preserved, and the humility to realize that we are here to serve ONE LORD, and not many little tin gods.

It is impossible to stop an idea who's time has come.

The Founders would have been DONE by now!


Paul
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.