Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Sunday, May 13, 2018

Final Reply to Larry Becraft


By Anna Von Reitz


I understand that Larry Becraft has been calling me a "Fake" Judge again, and his pal, Bob Hurt, too. 

Here is my Final Reply:

If I am a "fake" Judge, Larry, your butt is on the line for not prosecuting me. 

Put up or shut up, Larry. 

Otherwise, continuing to slander and defame me and accuse me of committing a crime without pursuing prosecution will be ample grounds to charge you both civilly and criminally.  And since you are claiming to be a Territorial United States Citizen, you have no recourse to say you are merely expressing your "opinion" and exercising your First Amendment rights---- because you have none. 

This game can be played from both sides.

38 comments:

  1. Now that he is on notice, wouldn't that be misprision of felony?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dont waste your breath, money or time any more on these fools. Anyone who has two cells can deduce the shaft for what it is not. Leave them to their own peril. For those who wish to stand around, point fingers, slander the truth and attempt to defame, are simply chewing cud without spitting...
    We all know the truth of you over the countless YEARS of your wonderful material, words and efforts, clearly done unconditionally and doing out of saving all our asses. Most, who spout this crap/shit, I have found do not KNOW 'shit' but only think they do. Moving onward, eat our dust. Next.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anna you have nothing to prove to no one, if people are paying attention to what you have to say and have demonstrated over the years, really paying attention. They would know, what I know, your gravitational tone and vibration are cosmic truths, displayed in a unique manner through your humble oratorical skills that have shed light into the dark corner of ignorance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anna
      Back in the 1990s i followed Larry for a several years and I felt Larry was always coming up short, never finished on what he was showing nothing concrete. It was like he was hiding something. I finally left his website as i could not trust him.
      Ray

      Delete
    2. Ralph....are you an English teacher or book writter...thats quite a vivid use of our language used in its proper sense...!!

      Delete
    3. Yes, very elegant Ralph. Kudos.

      Delete
  4. Hey Fake Judge Anna, don't leave me out! I want to see you try to prosecute me, too. Bob and Larry are good friends of mine, and we all know (as does most of the rest of the world) that everything you spew in your idiotic "legal" view is unadulterated bovine scat. I'm sure you will refuse to post my comment, as you have always done. You can't handle a debate on the REAL law, not your made-up garbage. Everyone who has followed this patriot mythology of yours ends up in jail and/or owing lots of money in fines and sanctions. Please, prove all of us wrong, show us the FIRST court victory you have in any way been responsible for. Show us all the people who no longer pay property taxes AND where their land has been removed from the tax rolls, with no balance owing. Show us the FIRST person to have all charges dismissed and who drives with no drivers license in an unregistered automobile. Show us ALL your victories, so we can join in the celebration. Or if you can't show us those victories, then STFU FAKE "Judge" Anna!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is the legal definition of person?
      Are you a real person, a stand up individual,
      do you drive a motor vehicle, keep gas in the tank, live in a democracy, have a cell phone & are an American?

      Delete
    2. Yep, I'm a real human being, a native Texan, live in a representative Republic, travel in an automobile and have not filed or paid a penny in "income" taxes since 1991, all the while running my engineering company, and with clients turning in 1099's on me approaching a million bux. I know the REAL law, and how it works, and what battles to fight and which ones are a waste of time, because nobody wins. How about you big guy, what have you accomplished?

      Delete
    3. So why the venom, klystron? Why not share your experience and knowledge to help others achieve what a you claim to have achieved?

      Delete
    4. Oh but I have. I have helped quite a few people break the chains of taxation, but I don't care to paint a target on my back by going into the "untaxing business" like many have done, and all have gone to jail, whether they broke the law or not... except for the ones Larry has represented. Let's see FAKE "Judge" Anna's track record. Oh, that's right, she doesn't have one.

      Delete
    5. Well you can do that here anonymously so go ahead. Let's see what you're really made of. You can only go to jail if you agree that you are a US citizen. Courts don't have jurisdiction over non US citizens. Larry is no doubt a self professed US citizen and certainly as a BAR card carrying member of a foreign agent registry. You have obviously not seen Anna's track record. If Anna is fake as you claim, then why is she not in jail? Why have the IRS relented pursuing her? Why is is she not being prosecuted for teaching people how to not pay taxes and defeat court cases? I can state that I have personally used her methods to be untaxed and have the IRS zero my out my 6 digit plus tax bill. There are many on this blog who can claim the same thing. If you are using Larry's methods, you may want to consider protecting yourself and exiting US jurisdiction. His methods are based on fighting the system from within as a US citizen still subject to prosecution and jail at their whim.

      Delete
    6. Your comment is...almost... too dumb to reply to, but I will anyway. Keep believing the whole "US citizen" fantasy, that has been debunked so many times I won't waste my keyboard on it. I'll just challenge you to SHOW ME any REAL "victories" FAKE "Judge" Anna has produced. Identify the court case and show the record. The whole secret behind beating the IRS is showing that there is no tax liability on the earnings of a person who is not incorporated or otherwise operating under some type of government privilege... PERIOD! That's how it worked from Lloyd Long to Tommy Cryer, and many in between. It has absolutely ZERO to do with any "US citizen" crap, as I have never even brought it up in my battles (which have been very few), nor did ANY of the aforementioned. Every one who has used that frivolous argument has lost. Get a clue. But someone dumb enough to believe the whole ridiculous "BAR" bovine excrement is probably too far gone to even recognize the truth. There is no secret government, Britain has no control over us, birth certificates are just state records of someones time, date and circumstances of birth, and aren't part of some bond/trust/account/piggybank/whatever, and every one who has tried to "cash in" on it has also gone to jail. As I said in the beginning, keep following an idiot, it gets more of you crackpots in jail and out of our misery.

      Delete
    7. As is yours but I will reply anyway. You only have one arrow in your quiver and are still a 14th amendment US citizen subject to US jurisdiction and can be railroaded at any time in any US court at the drop of a hat. If all of this is "crap" to use your words, then please explain to me why the IRS sent me a letter stating "Your case is dismissed" and zeroed out my account? Tell me why the SOS/DOS just issued me a non-US citizen state national passport not subject to US jurisdiction? Also please explain to me how I can download a printout of the bond and its value as attached to my alleged SSN and birth certificate directly from TreasuryDirect.gov? And why after years of not paying taxes out of my pocket but accepting them for value, that my SSA annual statement shows each of those years credited as payment in full? Also, please tell me how I was able to help 2 people get out of jail, one with 2 trumped up felonies and 1 misdemeanor and one with an outstanding warrant in another state for a small pot charge, and one individual from being remanded back to jail for tax evasion using this "crap" if it does not work? Finally, please explain how we can get the US tax court to issue an order of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction for all years back the first year of tax filing if all of this "crap" does not work? This 'crap" works so well that all of sudden IRS liens mysteriously vanish off of the county recorder books and people are being told to their face that they never existed even when we show them we have copies of them. If you would read all of Anna's posting and books instead of taking potshots at her, you would see that she has already put everything on the record for all to see. How do you refute this public evidence if you cling to your belief that the US is not a corporation? http://annavonreitz.com/usacorp.pdf
      No, it is you, my friend, who is in the dark and not willing to see what is really going on.

      Delete
    8. From Anna:

      What planet are you living on, Bob? Or "Klystron525"--- or yet another dishonest troll? Another pen name, Larry?


      You guys can't even define "citizenship"--- what makes you think you deserve to address me about anything when you can't even manage that much?


      Larry Becraft has replied to things I never said, and you think that that constitutes proving me wrong? Hello?


      Larry put up a big explanation of the repeal of the Act of 1871 and pretended that this had something to do with me. I never brought the subject up.


      And when I corrected him and gave the complete history of the Act of 1871 and showed how it was repealed and then instituted via a piecemeal process that was completed by 1878, neither you nor he had a word to say. He didn't show me up. I showed him up.


      I not only showed up the fact that he was making a false argument, but I shamed him for telling half the truth.


      You want to interpret that sorry performance and others like it, all having the same result, as Larry putting Anna in her place?


      Just like now. Faced with having to rattle off a few legal definitions, you suddenly have nothing to say.


      Why? Because you are blowing off your mouth. You don't really know what you're talking about. And you are too lazy to find out.


      Shame on you. Shame on the horse that brought you. Shame on your pal, Larry, too, because he knows better.


      And here's a special "reply" to you, Klystron ---- I haven't paid a dime of Federal Income Tax since 1998.


      I haven't paid property tax for almost that long.


      And if other people haven't done the same and more by following my lead, then its their misfortune.

      Delete
    9. Ok "1freeman", send scans of your alleged passport and your make-believe "bond" and the web address where it can be found on the Treasury.gov site. My email is Klystron525@gmail.com, so let's see your great evidence. Feel free to redact whatever you want, but leave something there so I can at least see that it is an official DOS document. BTW, the name is Mike and I'm not pretending to be Bob or Larry. I don't have to, they have already taken your mythology apart just fine. I'm not going to get baited into your dumb arguments, show hard evidence of anything you claim to have done; court case, docket number and address. I won't hold my breath.

      Delete
    10. Now why would I want to do that, Mike? So you can forward them on to your friend Larry and he can forward them on to his buddies to try to throw a monkey wrench into our processes and what is working? No thank you. I have nothing to gain by proving anything to you and you have everything to lose. You have not exactly been gracious from the start, you know. If you want to find out how it works so well for us, you will have to dig for it yourself. FYI, as a American non-citizen national, I am not even allowed to share state secrets with federal US citizens who are foreign to our Republic. I already sent you proof that the US is a corporation and you are ignoring it. Don't you realize that Larry and his buddies are part of the US corporate system and profiteering handsomely by it? There is no incentive for them to want to correct any of it because it is their bread & butter. Quite the opposite. They do not care that it is crooked or corrupt as long as it is making them money. Pirates on the high seas plunder, that is what they do. Their day will come that they wished they had because they will be outside looking in. BTW: mythology is so overused and unfounded. Try something different like actual history and Constitutional supreme law of the land. At least that would be accurate.
      PS: care to explain the 29,000 sealed indictments on the public record since Oct 30th of 2017 headed their way?

      Delete
    11. OF COURSE YOU WON'T!!! Because it doesn't exist, just like FAKE "Judge" Anna's record of victories! I have a perfectly good passport that I travel the world with, and it does NOT bind me to anything, it just let's me get back into my home country. And no, you have NOT sent me "proof" that the US is a corporation, but I am thoroughly familiar with the court case that you quote (Penhallow) which has no such text, the deliberate misinterpretation of the Act of 1871, 28 USC 3002, the list goes on ad nauseum of all the things you deliberately misrepresent. And now, when I ask to see your "proof", you prevaricate, obfuscate, or just plain lie. You have made your imaginary little world of non-US citizens, we are Brits, the Vatican owns everything and our birth certificate is worth a billion dollars in a secret account. You can't lawfully prove a damn bit of it, yet anyone who challenges you is an enemy government agent, or something else too ridiculous for even a James Bond movie. This is why the rest of the patriot movement, and even the overwhelming majority of the legal community, are laughing our asses off at you, and you are too egotistical/sociopathic/ignorant/brainwashed/stupid to be able to see it. This is why when the government decides to stop ignoring you, and you have become too big a criminal to ignore, you go to jail. There has yet to be the FIRST court case where ANY of your gibberish has even marginally prevailed. And it is why I have had so much fun trolling you. Come on, throw some more of your brilliance at me, this is great sport knocking it out of the park!!! Oh, yeah, about those "29,000 indictments". Wanna explain where the f*** they are, since the record shows that there haven't been that many indictments, COMBINED, in several years time. Oh, that's right, it's all part of that secret government that not even any of the Representatives or Senators even knows exist. Shhhhh... I'll be quiet, I won't blow your cover... You might want to check that tinfoil hat, I think it might be slipping.

      Delete
    12. Mike, I am glad that you at least admit that you are nothing more than a troll and a blowhard at that. Just to prove you up, here is a link to just one article out of hundreds that prove there are now 29,015 sealed indictments outstanding since Oct 30 2018 and more are in the way.
      https://squawker.org/politics/doj-releases-list-of-24500-sealed-indictments/
      Of course you could go ahead and confirm that on Pacer but that might just be a bit too unnerving for you since it would prove that I am right and you are wrong. But such is life.

      Delete
    13. Oh, I'm so glad you brought that up. I actually DID check into that on PACER around the end of March for the ED of Virginia, which would likely contain a large portion of them, and I believe the latest case filed was #18cr137, or very close to it. Not 18cr24379. So those indictments are SO sealed and secret that they are even hidden from PACER. Right! So here we show that you are again spreading fake information, but why would I expect anything less. I'll even be nice and not point out that you state the indictments are from the future, since Oct 30 2018. You want to believe all the black helicopter crap, and adamantly refuse to check the facts yourself through credible sources. In fact, this was such a big fake story it even made the MSM.
      http://www.newsweek.com/how-storm-biggest-fake-news-story-796725
      You guys are hilarious, keep it up, I'm having a blast.

      And I almost forgot this gem. If FAKE "Judge" Anna is so great and legally omniscient, then why did her house get foreclosed (case # 3AN-12-06858CI) and she also lose big in Tax Court (docket # 1984-12, USTC). Looks like her vast legal acumen ain't all that great. Looks like its just half-vast.

      Delete
    14. Wow, splitting hairs now, Mike? A simple typo and you go ballistic. I already stated 2017 in my prior post but I guess you were too busy attacking to remember that. Boy, you sure are going all out to try to prove us wrong and yourself right.
      So you look up one case and claim that it's not there? Well, big guy, try these for a complete up to date breakdown: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KPh2ASFggwF1XVnVpDB3mtwvwlH71om6
      And what's with the Newsweek story link? Says nothing about the sealed indictments. So, pray tell, what's your agenda and why are you here in the first place if all of this is just "crap" to you? What's this bug up your rear if you claim not to care about anything we are accomplishing? Or are you secretly concerned that you may just possibly be wrong and want to reaffirm your own beliefs and quash your own fears? If you don't believe any of this 'crap', then why are you wasting your precious time and ours on it? Go troll somewhere else where you will be appreciated, like CNN. Anna already explained her IRS case in detail but of course you have not bothered to read about it. She published it for all to see and it is still right there on her site if you are willing to go look for it. So tell me, if this order is supposedly valid, then why didn't they pursue it? After all, this order was issued 5 years ago in 2013. Why didn't this all powerful agency take her to USDC to pursue criminal charges for tax evasion and willful failure to file? Why did they not levy her to collect on their order or foreclose on her house? Maybe they tried but were unsuccessful? Why did they drop the whole thing? Why is Anna not in jail? Because they have no jurisdiction over a live man or woman, that's why. That's the part that you are simply not getting. You are so willing to believe that everyone is a US citizen it sounds like you have skin in the game (maybe you are ghostwriting and shilling for Larry?). Tell me, how can anyone be a citizen of a corporation? You can't. First of all you have to be participating in government to be a citizen. Second, the US is a corporation as I already sent you proof of which you claim I did not but you simply ignored the first link I sent you and which is still on the record if you will simply scroll up. You can be a stockholder or employee of a corporation, yes, but not citizen. As such even the term US citizen is an oxymoron. And that is what they presume you to be, a federal employee and a withholding agent. If Anna has not paid taxes on her property since 1998 then of course they would try to foreclose on her. So please explain to me how is it that she is still living in her house all this time if she is foreclosed on? Because they cannot foreclosure on a live man or woman standing upon the land, that's why. They only have jurisdiction over US citizens and not over non-US, non-14th amendment, non-federal citizen, American state nationals. The truth is you simply cannot understand nor explain how all of this could be possible and you are too close minded to even want to understand. So please go somewhere else where they will appreciate your troll talents and stop banging our head against a wall that is not going to crumble for you no matter how hard you shill and do.

      Delete
    15. Yes, more obfuscation and lies, or is it just plain ignorance. As government wheels turn slowly, you can fool (some) people into believing that FAKE "Judge" Anna has won, because she was supposedly still living in the house. That was partially true, at least until November 10, 2017. That was when title to the property was transferred to the Matanuska - Susitna Borough by judicial order, Case # 3PA-15-0153 CI, document # 2017-028117-0 and was officially foreclosed (would you like a copy of the court order?). So that is a confirmed loss. Whether she has already been evicted or not, I didn't bother to check. But it now belongs to the state, not her.

      On the "25000 indictments", more obfuscation. If you want to count ALL proceedings (that is what is listed, NOT indictments) from every judicial district, then you are showing that nothing sinister is happening at all. That total is less than the year before, and shows no significant spikes in any indictments anywhere in the country. This is what the whole QAnon/Storm/Pizzagate/whatever conspiracy theory is about, and is supposedly where most of these mystery indictments come from. Another nothingburger.
      https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/sealed-indictments-qanon-conspiracy/

      So don't you ever get tired of losing? I'm having a great time winning!

      Delete
    16. Mike, you have just exposed yourself and Larry. Great job. You just tipped us your hand. Only an attorney would go through such extremes to try to prove something and have their finger on the dial to access all these court case citings at their whim. Admit it. Larry is feeding you. The gig is up. However Larry didn't finish the job though and did not check the eviction record. Why not while you're both at it since he has unlimited attorney access to every case in every court in the country? Anna did say she did not pay income or property taxes since 1998, didn't she? So then why is she not in jail? You still have not answered that question. Since I can only share with you what I have read, I will let her speak for herself. The debunko article you linked states: "do have one very real piece of evidence at their disposal: the existence of sealed indictments is public." and "the number #QAnon is using is factually correct". But then it goes off the current topic and on to try to debunk the whole thing by only analyzing the 1077 sealed case from 2009 and claiming that most sealed cases are not criminal again only looking at the 2009 data and completely ignoring the present number. And no, the total is NOT less than the year before. if there were only 1077 sealed cases in 2009 and there are 29,000 in the last 6 months, that is not less but a major increase. What part about sealed do you not get? No one knows what these cases are until they are unsealed and certainly not the fakestream media. A few of these have already been unsealed and yes, they were criminal indictments. Tada! You cannot deny that the average 1000/yr is now trumped, pardon the pun, by 29,000 in the last 6 months. Something is up and in a big way no matter how much you wish to deny it. Is Larry running scared yet? He should be. His BAR card carrying days will soon be over and if he doesn't watch himself, he may soon be one of these sealed cases himself. Many honest lawyers who have been willing to admit it when confronted with the facts and evidence, have further researched for themselves and have made the right choice and turned in their BAR cards and resigned form this whole mess. Even judges. They see the writing on the wall. MENE MENE TEKEL UPHARSIN. You may want to look that one up. BTW: Larry's track record is not that hot you know:
      http://tpgurus.wikidot.com/larry-becraft
      I wouldn't want to count on him defending me.

      Delete
    17. You are absolutely hilarious, you just keep me laughing. This is great, let's keep it going. First, I'm not now nor have I ever been an attorney, I'm an engineer, I just know the law inside and out. And I haven't spoken with Larry in weeks, so he's not "feeding" me anything. Whether she has been evicted yet or not is irrelevant, that is no longer her house, whether she is in it or not. At some point she will be forcefully removed. I thought she was the greatest legal mind in the country, why couldn't she beat the court case and not lose her house? And she isn't in jail because not paying taxes, property or IRS, is a CIVIL matter, nobody goes to jail for that. If you don't know that, you really are uneducated. But you are obfuscating again, and not even doing a good job at it.

      Now, to the QAnon fake indictments. Obviously you need some remedial reading lessons, as you were unable to comprehend what was written in the article in plain English (or maybe you just decided to lie about it to try to justify your disinformation). First, the article states; "A random sampling of these files showed 83 percent of sealed magistrate cases to be warrant applications or tracking devices. They are NOT indictments, but #QAnon’s number includes them anyway. We know this from their own methodology." All the numbers in the charts you are flogging as "proof" are actions and proceedings. Some are indictments, but most are not. That is the lie you are propagating. The article concludes; "But we do know, at the very least, that the massive numbers of “sealed indictments” being thrown around by #QAnon believers is inaccurate, and isn’t being compared to previous years correctly. Meanwhile, sealed indictment mania is a conspiracy theory that feeds itself, and will continue to, by adding more numbers to an essentially meaningless tally, and pretending it’s a portend of things to come." So as I said before, correctly, all the numbers that add up to 25,000 or whatever today's tally is, are completely meaningless relating to the actual number of indictments. But as it relates to all actions and proceedings, the number is lower than last year's total, and proves little or nothing. If there really is such a biblical flood of indictments, more than ever seen before, then where are all the arrests? They would already have had to be arresting them by the hundreds... oh, unless that's all secret and hidden, too. Yeah, it's secret.. yeah, that's the ticket... secret...they're at the FEMA camps... LMAO!

      Yes, the handwriting is on the wall about you, too, and it says MESHUGGENEH NUDNIK SCHLIMAZEL.

      Delete
    18. Correction, Mike, you claim to know statutes and codes, which are not positive law. None of these are bonded and therefore not enforceable unless agreed to. Statutes and codes and an administrative court order from an admirably court operating in equity do not change a property's ownership that has been firmly established upon the land by accepting and correcting the deed. BTW: courts will absolutely refuse to return a subpoena when requested to do so to prove on the record that the statute is constitutional. That is the remedy right there for dismissal. Regarding Anna's alleged foreclosure as you cite from this case: https://www.legalnotice.org/details1.aspx?id=6779569
      it shows the property address to be 2390 South Park Road, Big Lake, Alaska which is also still her current address where she lives and has not been evicted. Since you claim to know it all better than anyone else, please explain to all of us how can she be foreclosed upon with final judgement with a court order and not be evicted 5 years later when this court order is from 2013? And not having paid income or property taxes since 1998? She must be doing something right which flies right in the face of all of your legal assumptions, now doesn't it? A woman with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with a theory. The facts are that you and Larry live in a fictional world established upon the jurisdiction of the sea and Anna lives in the real world jurisdiction upon the land. She is not subject to US corporate jurisdiction and neither am I and anyone else who corrects their public record. This is why they cannot get to her with their US corporate fiction BS because she supersedes them with her authority as a real live American state national woman upon the land of the Republic. You cannot argue with that although I know you will try and again you will fail. Reality beats fiction every time. The reality is that the US corporation was superimposed over the uSofA Republic. Believe it or not but they did this under the Constitution under "the right to contract shall not be impaired" clause to not be hung for treason. It is nevertheless still a fraud though for non-disclosure and as such void nunc pro tunc ab initio. That is why you must agree with and volunteer for all of your benefit privileges such as paying taxes, accepting their traffic tickets, utilizing their courts and even the benefit privilege of jail. That is why you must state your NAME in court to agree to be the surety for the case and proceedings as being the trustee by joinder of your NAME with your name and your body as collateral to pay for their bonds. If you refuse to give them your name, they cannot proceed. This is how I helped a complete novice defeat 2 trumped up felonies and a misdemeanor and got his case dismissed, simply because he would got state his name in court and they had no choice but to dismiss his case, release him from jail and drop all charges and seal the record. Now what do you say to that? This is impossible in your world of fiction but it is the absolute truth in our world of reality. As an engineer you must agree that everything has a foundation to be able to build on. The US corporation was built on the foundation of the uSofA Republic and not the other way around. They are now usurping the 19 delegated services they were hired to perform. The servant US corp is trying to displace the master uSofA Republic and destroy the foundation upon which it stands and which will ultimately cause it to implode upon itself which is what is currently happening right now. They are bankrupt and desperately trying to float a new corp called THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, another all caps usurper corporate fiction to charge all their debts back to the people. That is what Macron came here for to file the docs but was prevented and went home with his tail tucked between his legs.

      Delete
    19. You just refuse to acknowledge reality, no matter how overwhelming the evidence. You do know that this is a sign of mental illness, don't you? You believe her lies, and you are probably even lying for her, that is how brainwashed you are. And since you never question anything your great legal mistress proclaims, you probably don't even know how to look things up. So I'll help you out, maybe we can save you yet, there may be hope. Here is the court record. Yes, judgement was entered in 2013, but actual foreclosure and assignment of the deed occurred on November 10, 2017 (after the statutory redemption period expired and was filed with the court on November 3, 2017) and recorded on December 1, 2017.
      https://records.courts.alaska.gov/eaccess/search.page.6?x=Fj8IEXqNh55QvnwuGugnh2*EnS6Drwn-FOweYi30LS4i6clo1tYizgnZ4BdQ-m5mxPje0A48OwD-RqH7vQq8Gg
      If you want to give me your email address I will send you copies of the court order transferring property to the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH. Here is the current property record.
      https://www.matsugov.us/myproperty/mydetail.aspx?pID=8318
      So you see that the Borough now owns the property. In fact, FAKE "Judge" Anna even admits that the property has been seized and no longer belongs to her. annavonreitz.com/publicnoticebuyerbeware.pdf
      Unfortunately the Alaska courts website is having problems, or I would already know if there has been an eviction order granted yet, but even if not it is coming soon.

      So all your gibberish aside, the proof is still undeniable that she didn't pay property taxes on her house and it has been foreclosed and transferred to the Borough, she don't own it no more! An eviction will be forthcoming, she will be thrown out on her crazy ass and it will be sold on the courthouse steps, and she can't do a damn thing about it. She will probably try to file some frivolous suits, which will be thrown out, if they are even accepted in the first place. So admit it, she's a fake, phony, fraud and idiot. Nothing in her repertoire of stupidity has ever prevailed in any court, and she is delusional if she imagines herself as any type of "judge" over anything extending past the limits of her sandbox.
      Damn, I just love taking you clowns apart (my apologies to any real clowns for any perceived insult).

      Delete
    20. No, Mike, it is you who are refusing to see reality and your mind is clouded by fiction. And no you are not mentally ill, it is just how you were indoctrinated and you apparently have accepted your lot in life by sticking your head in the sand and refusing to renew your mind to the actual reality based on sound Constitutional law and factual history. Your fictional perception has become your reality. Everything you cite is a fictional incorporated record by a fictional incorporated court in a fictional incorporated jurisdiction. Here is proof that this is all fiction and that they are just doing what they want to do unlawfully chasing their own tail. There is no such thing as a 4 year statutory redemption period. Alaska state statutes only allows a 12 month redemption period after confirmation of the sale which was on 11/06/2014 on the record. So how do you explain that, my friend? Title does not equal possession. Did you read the corrective deed Anna filed on 09/7/2017? Anna as a live woman is in possession of the real property while the borough only claims to be in possession of the title as a fiction which is a worthless piece of paper. They needed to transfer the paper and falsify the records for their own internal tax accounting. So please explain how come the record shows that no tax has been billed yet for 2017 when it is already deep into 2018? Could it be that they just don't want to pay the tax themselves yet claim to own the title? Figures. You also need to read what you are claiming is a so called admission that her property was taken because it does not say that at all. This Buyer Beware document was dated in 2015 to ward off bidders on the title to her property to make them aware that the title of the property has baggage and the illegalities involved with buying such a property with a clouded title. That’s all. And please explain this one if you can. That was 6 months ago. How come she has still not been evicted then? Doesn't eviction follow FJ and end of the redemption period pretty quickly? Then why have they not evicted her by now? Cat got your tongue? Well, let me help you out here. Because they simply cannot evict nor do anything where they have no jurisdiction. O sure, they can shuffle papers around all they want but that does not change the reality. Were you aware that no sheriff is authorized to evict a non US citizen and there is no court in the US that has J over a live man or woman standing upon the land. If you are such a legal eagle, then show us all where it states that any court in the US has J over non-US citizens. Let me help you out here before you exhaust yourself, you will not find it. Quite the opposite because they are all courts of limited J which simply means that the government they function under is not sovereign or otherwise their courts would have unlimited J over all matters. This is where their power structure crumbles and falls down. They only have J over fictional, corporate, 14th amendment, US citizens and non-citizen nationals of the U.S., period. They have no J whatsoever over American non-citizen state nationals (not of the U.S.) unless conferred upon them by the individual. The people are sovereign, not this fictional so called U.S. government. Besides, you still have not answered any of my questions and I assume you are ignoring them all because you simply cannot. Like how come the evidence is clear on the public record that the US is not just one but many incorporated fictions as proven here:
      http://annavonreitz.com/usacorp.pdf

      Delete
    21. Like how was I able to free 2 people from jail and one from being recommitted back to jail, all on the fact that no court has J over a live man upon the land once affirmed? Like how was I able to zero out my tax account by AFV, a so called patriot myth? Like why is Anna still in her home and not in jail if she is a "fake" judge and committing the crime of impersonating a "real" judge, a felony? And for tax evasion and willful failure to file a 1040? And unlike your legal assumption, willful failure to file does get turned into criminal by the legal fiction courts. There are plenty of people in jail for this today. Like how come the DOS will issue a non US citizen state national passport when demanded when they only show 2 US options on their DS-11? If you are truly an engineer then you must prove all possibilities before coming to a conclusion, correct? Then I challenge you to go to this site where I got mine, to confirm and even go through their process and prove it to yourself: destinationfreedom.org
      And how come the US tax court will issue dismissal for LOJ for all years for failure to provide a Notice of Determination and Notice of Deficiency for all years back to the first year you ever paid taxes when petitioned and which are public documents available for download on the ustaxcourt.gov website? And how come we are able to get the IRS to literally remove all liens from the county recorder and have them claim that we never ever even had any liens even when we rub their nose in the certified copies of them? Mike, no doubt you are a smart guy but in the wrong direction. Do you really believe that this so called government is true and honest with the people? Do you really believe that they have your best interest at heart (which they really don't even have)? Are you really such an advocate for your own enslavement by the same people who would not hesitate to beat you up by the road side and throw you in jail w/o cause or remedy at the drop of a hat? There are plenty of examples of this hitting the lame stream media every day. Whose side are you really on? We the people or them the oligarchs who run this country under presumed authority they do not lawfully have? You yourself claim that you fight the IRS yourself using Larry's methods. Why, if you are on their side? Do you not feel for all the people who are being tricked and coerced into paying taxes they do not owe and thrown in jail for it if they dare challenge the system? Is this the kind of government you endorse? Do you not agree that something is terribly wrong in this country and that something needs to be done about it? Why such animosity towards a woman who is devoting her life to helping others to rectify the problems in this country with no monetary incentive or ambition whatsoever? That is more than anyone can say of your motives and intentions towards helping humanity I am sorry to say.

      Delete
    22. As I said, government wheels turn slowly. It typically takes years to complete actions which have a deadline of a year or less. But see, all the rest of the real world operates on the real law, not her BS. The real world law records the MatSu Borough as the real owner of the property now. No make-believe documents she files have any relevance in the real world, and are powerless. So a real person will purchase her property at auction, she will be lawfully evicted, and they will then own and possess it for as long as they wish, and she can't do a thing about it. And I really loved her deed/lien filing with the Pope! That is the craziest thing she has done yet, I'm sure the Holy See will be jumping in Alaska's chili in a heartbeat. Oops!, there's just a minor problem. She filed it in the wrong jurisdiction! Uh-Oh, how could she possibly do that? She knows well, from page 15 of her book that the Pope controls the Air Jurisdiction; "Living and dead souls, angels, spirits, demons and ideas global in nature, are controlled by the Pope and his appointees". The jurisdiction over the land falls to Spain. "All resources of the land, including people, animals, plants and minerals are National in nature, and are controlled by the Spanish King (if there is one)". So looks like she filed in the wrong jurisdiction, how in the world could she NOT know that, she wrote the book???

      You know, it has really been a hoot. I have had some great laughs from you people trying every way in the world to explain away her craziness, and even to justify your own. I have had a few days off from my highly paid consulting business, but now it's time to go back to work. I know you really believe you got me on every point, but you are just deluding yourself. She no longer owns her house, she has a huge judgement against her by Treasury, who probably aren't pursuing it because there isn't anything to seize, the county got first dibs. But everything she has ever attempted has gone down to utter failure. The fact that you refuse to believe it changes not a damn thing.

      Oh, and as far as my methods with the IRS, I've been practicing that since long before I met Larry. And here is a complete list of all the actions IRS has taken against me, including all liens, levies, Tax Court cases, hearing, audits, you name it.
      1.
      .
      .
      .

      Looks like I'm doing it a lot better than she is. So thanks for the fun, I've had a blast, and I thoroughly proved my points. I may be back again to play with you guys, when I have some more time off, but that may be a while, I have projects going from the Caribbean to Canada, so I'll be busy.
      Buh-Bye!!

      Delete
    23. Well, Mike, she appears to be blocking them successfully at every turn and is till in her home. Nevertheless, have a great trip and maybe you can think about my questions in the meantime and finally answer them when you return. Ciao.

      Delete
  5. It has been my opinion for years that Larry is a 'fake attorney' in that when he was in control of a particular Yahoo group [ AMOJ ] and I started to discuss the 14th and its unconstitutional application, he got really upset and made it impossible for me to post. Facts, including clear case citations which expose the fraud were forbidden to be discussed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "My mind is made up! Don't confuse me with the facts!"

      Delete
  6. Right, and how many landmark tax cases have you won, tough guy??? If your facts are patriot myth, then they ain't facts, bucko.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Freeman, You are Right On!!!
    Could you tell me how i can get...SOS/DOS just issued me a non-US citizen state national passport not subject to US jurisdiction?
    I shall surely appreciate it. My e-mail: humblecenter@gmail.com
    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, Joshua. Just sent you an email. For others interested, I got mine here: destinationfreedom.org

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.