Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Monday, May 21, 2018

As Part of the Ongoing Effort


By Anna Von Reitz

The article re-posted below will help you understand why Rod Class's Administrative Rulings matter.  The short answer is that  the State of North Carolina admitted that the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA is a private subcontractor, and that the State of North Carolina had no direct administrative control over the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and its employees. [Direct administrative control is the responsibility of the parent corporation, dba UNITED STATES and the US Bankruptcy Trustees.]

If you have been following the history, you already know why this is so. 

The Territorial United States franchise doing business as "the State of North Carolina" was bankrupted in 1933.  In 1946, it was still "incompetent" due to bankruptcy and the Bankruptcy Trustees appointed a Municipal United States Corporation, the UNITED STATES, INC., and its franchise doing business as the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, to take over the job of providing "essential government services". 

Joe Average in North Carolina didn't notice or care.  What difference did it make to him who swept the streets and wrote traffic tickets?  It was the same way throughout the country.  People were given no disclosure about any of these arrangements made "for" them. 

But as we shall see, private incorporated subcontractors are not subject to the same rules as public institutions--- and that gives rise to both the situation confirmed by Rod Class's efforts, and the situation described below by one angry attorney: 

DUN & BRADSTREET: 'RATING SERVICE' FOR ALL CORPORATE ENTITIES'

There are a few more things worth noting regarding the DUN & BRADSTREET listing service: D-B is a financial rating service for both ‘public’ and ‘private’ corporations. Utilities and municipal bond ratings would come under D-B preview for certain. It just really never occurred to me years ago when doing litigation discovery, research and analysis, and ‘structured settlements’ that there was seemingly anything incoherent with that fact that municipal and utility bonds are integral to D-B rating services. 

I never ever stopped to think about or scrutinize that fact, let alone allow my deliberation and research skills to ‘wander’ or ‘wonder’ into research that would have disclosed what we recently found. Part of the ease of discovering the complex web of inter-related inter-locking CORPORATIONS had to do with ease of electronic research over the internet. Years ago, if one wanted to search anything within any of the rating services, including “Moody’s”, Standard & Poors, and Dun & Bradstreet, + others, one would have to either have to be a subscriber to the service in order to manually expedite their search-rating results, or, one would have to pay a fee and cause a search to arise. 

D & B ‘ratings’ are affected every time a ‘public hazard bond’, or ‘surety performance bond’, or ‘indemnity bond’ is complained against. An ‘administrative complaint’ is usually all that it takes to cause a ‘tag’ or book entry to be made on any particular bond. Any particular bond, once complained against three or more times, causes a change in underwriting bond ‘risk’. For bonded Bar attorneys, who in many cases may also be appointed, commissioned, or elected to ‘public office’ as ‘Judge’, ‘Clerk of Court’, etc. when/if their bond is complained against for good and reasonable cause, their bond may be ‘pulled’, and due to loss of effective bond or ‘suretyship’, they cannot ‘practice’ or ‘discharge’ the duty of the office held, or occupied. 

In short, the bond maker-issuer is the bonding party for the benefit or on behalf of the ‘bondee’, ie. the purported ‘public officer’, ‘employee’, or ‘official’. This would extend as well to all other ‘public employees’ and ‘agents’-‘agencies’, etc. Every ‘person’ being bonded has a Dun & Bradstreet ‘bond rating’. At least it is reasonable to assume such. 

Once three complaints are filed against any bond, assuming they are with merit and well supported by fact and ‘law’ of the ‘breach’ of fiduciary duty, the bond is most always pulled or revoked. The ‘servant’ at ‘risk’ by assuming the responsibilities of operating in any ‘official capacity’ or by ‘employment’, can no longer be underwritten as a ‘no risk’ or ‘low risk’ contract. 

One incident of ‘breach’ or operating ‘ultra vires’, or ‘without the law’, causes the ‘immunity’ provisions of the written ‘law’ to cease to be effective, because when one violates the law as a ‘public servant’, one’s immunity blanket ceases to apply, thereby leaving the insurer or bondsman or bond issuer exposed to the liability arising from the servant’s acts, which under any ‘breach of law authority’ causes or gives rise to an ‘injury’ which is a civil or criminal commercial liability. 

Everything, whether civil or criminal or martial, is a matter of ‘commerce’, and admiralty law is the venue and jurisdiction by which disputes in/of commercial nature are resolved in truth and fact. 

All writings of the United States of America and of the UNITED STATES, or any other ‘government unit’ are forms of making an ‘offer to contract’. There is no written matter of material fact or issue of fact that is ‘law’ which is not bonded. There is no ‘office’ or function of ‘civil service’ or ‘public’ function that is not bonded. If the bond is not in existence, the bondee is ‘exposed’ and without ‘coverage’ by any ‘surety’. 

Therefore, there is no ‘guarantor’ behind the agent, officer, official, or employee having ‘exposure’, by ‘assumption of risk’, of a material breach or injury in fact by the bondee [person being bonded or insured]. This leaves the person under taint or cloud of operating ‘in the public interest’ without the constitutionally and statutorily required bond, and therefore, in tacit violation of the constitutions and statutes under the scheme of ‘law’. 

“Law” applies first and foremost to government, its employees, officers, and agents. In today’s rogue ‘doctrine of necessity’ ‘de facto’ environment, research has proven and documented that no person, performing as an ‘officer of the court’, being an alleged ‘judge’, being a ‘Bar attorney’ of the ABA or the Federal or State Bars, has a bona fide Constitutional Oath. 

The Bond that is supposed to be in existence sits atop the Oath. The Oath is not merely ‘incidental’ to the ‘office’ as has been ruled in some States by their corrupt court “officers”. The Oath is what imparts lawful and legal authority to the man/woman coming into ‘holding’ a ‘public office’ and becoming a ‘public official’. A public servant having no proper Oath cannot have a proper Bond to encompass or include those risks associated with the ‘office’, ‘discharge of fiduciary duty’ of the office, and the various levels or elements of ‘law authority’ underlying the office. 

Hence, one may take an Oath to any office of the incorporated State, or the UNITED STATES, and not take a preceding Oath to the unincorporated de jure state or United States of America, and operate non/un constitutionally, which is all that has been going on for years, but which was not known or Law-Lawyer tells of truth about oaths and bonds.doc Page 2 of 3 11 April 2008 understood as being a material breach to the People of the State/state, causing or giving rise to material injuries in fact as a consequence of operating ‘ultra vires’, ie. outside the corporate charters and ‘trust indentures’ which create the office in the first place. 

In the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, not one judge has taken the necessary Oaths of office, which include the organic ‘state’ de jure republic oath for “North Carolina”, and the subsequent and inferior or ‘lesser’ oath for the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. The latter ‘public entity’ has federal character, a Federal Employer Identification Number, a Federal Tax Identification Number, and is a federal ‘instrumentality’ of the CORPORATE ‘UNITED STATES’, and the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, under definition of 28 U.S.C. §3002(15), AND 26 U.S.C. §§7701 (a)(9) and (10). This documented fact pertains to every judge in every State court, but also applies to most every other ‘public official’ or ‘law enforcement officer’. 

I cannot address what other State public pretenders and ‘District Attorneys’ or “Prosecutors” do when bringing a criminal complaint against any “natural person”, which includes CORPORATIONS [YES, they are both the class of ‘person’ under statute ‘law’ definition], but in the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, when it is the bringer of the action, the People of the State are never brought in as ‘party to the action’. Only the CORPORATION name is found on the Criminal Complaint or Information form. Only the corporate State is present in the courtroom, trying a case before a CORPORATE JUDGE. 

There exists a complete breach and break from the Constitution of North Carolina, because the People of the republic North Carolina and their ‘law’ are not present in the action nor party to it. They are not in the courtroom, nor are they acting through any ‘officer’ of the People, as ‘District Attorney’, which Office alleges to be a ‘servant of the People’. It is NOT. Even the DA does not have the mandatory and proper Constitutional Oath as condition precedent under NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTES, which clearly state at Chapter 11, Section 11, there shall be two Constitutional Oaths taken. 

Absent performance according to that bonded STATUTE regarding bonded Oaths, leaves a clear and certain risk liability issue for the Bond maker-issuer. Some bonding agent has bonded the Statutes and other writings of the law of the State. Some bond issuer has bonded State ‘employees’, ‘officers’, and ‘public officials’. Some bond issuer has, therefore, “underwritten” risk on the basis of having full knowledge that there exist no Constitutional Oaths beneath the CORPORATE OATH. 

One cannot but presume that the bond issuer-maker has full disclosure; after all, ‘they’ have been registered within each State Department of Corporations, do business in all ‘States’ and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and are presumed to know the “LAW”….including the “law of the land”, which under their “UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE” and all secondary ‘Civil’ or ‘Criminal’ Codes, would find itself to be in harmony with their legislative jurisdictional ‘statutes and implementing regulations’ at U.C.C. 1-308, 1-207, and 1- 103, wherein All Rights are Reserved, and the U.C.C. states that it is harmonious with ‘all jurisdictions’, which would include the jurisdiction of the “law of the land”, ‘common law’, and the various common law Constitutions of the underlying several de jure republic ‘states’ of the American union, aka, United States of America. 

Why would any bond underwriter knowingly underwrite these CORPORATE STATES, UNITED STATES, all of their ‘sub-corporations’, agents-agencies, instrumentalities, and their ‘law authority’ found in their various ‘writings’, private ‘laws’ etc., to operate a ‘public’ or ‘municipal’ construct as if it were ‘lawful government’, but knowing that it really is not?  [Answer: they have named us-- our private ESTATES as the sureties of their bonds, so in order to get relief or restitution for their evil deeds, we have to injure ourselves.]

The underwriters of bonds, therefore, could not allege any defense against a massive intake of related claims by private inhabitants of any of the States or UNITED STATES who have been “compelled” under duress, extreme duress, or risk of extreme duress and prejudice of ‘seizure’, ‘confiscation’ ‘impound’, ‘occupation’, ‘detainment’, or injury or termination by any means of potentially lethal force? 

Everyone who has ever been inside a State of North Carolina administrative or judicial ‘law’ proceeding, or been before any ‘clerk’ or ‘judge’ of same, or been prosecuted by any County District Attorney within said State/STATE, has been within a “brutum fulmen”: Black’s Law Dictionary, 4t Edition: “brutum fulmen”: “An empty noise; an empty threat. A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no judgment at all, and by which no rights are are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone. Dollert v. Pratt-Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348. Also, see Corpus Juris Secundum, “Judgments” §§ 499, 512 546, 549. 

The “Office of Sheriff” is a most important link between the People of any de jure republic ‘state’ and the Courts, and Offices of the State. However, it has been discovered that many Sheriffs do not, as Chief Law Enforcement Officer of any local ‘county’ or County, have a bona fide prior or ‘precedent’ Constitutional Oath to their respective republic state. Or, they may have taken a bona fide Constitutional Oath, and then disclaimed or disavowed it immediately henceforth by taking a CORPORATE Constitutional Oath. “A man cannot serve two masters”.

This same “axiomatic” principal applies to ‘officers’ of the United States as well. How can the newly ‘sworn’ Attorney General of the UNITED STATES, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL [a federal corporation] take a Constitutional Oath to the United States, or UNITED STATES, and be held to such an Oath as ‘liable’ for his/her breach of fiduciary duty to the people of the United States of America, or to the franchise corporate trust estate ‘citizens of the UNITED STATES’, when the office ‘holder’ enjoins by contract to the ‘international purposes of Law-Lawyer tells of truth about oaths and bonds.doc Page 3 of 3 11 April 2008 INTERPOL’, under its Constitution [charter-contract] at Article 30 shortly after taking said Oath? Article 30 is quite explicit in meaning and intent. If one understands the “international purposes of INTERPOL” and all other ‘international agencies’ was and is to ‘establish a financial dictatorship within the United States/United States of America’ for the benefit of undisclosed third parties, under jurisdiction and authority of the IMF-U.N, then all of the lower level ‘breach of duty’ by lack of proper Bond and Oath issues would begin to make clear sense. [Jeff Sessions and Steven T. Mnuchin are both Interpol Officers and have renounced all loyalty to this country and its people.]

In short, all alleged ‘public servants’ are serving ‘public policy’ and ‘public administration’ of the ‘laws’ and enforcing those laws to protect the CORPORATION, to the disinterest and detriment of the People, whom have been ‘captured’, ‘searched’, ‘seized’, ‘boarded’ as with a ‘vessel’, and which People have been placed into ‘warehouse storage’ as ‘human capital’ and ‘property’ of the de facto King or “Sovereign”, which/who has conquered and occupied the Office of the People, and subverted and subordinated it into an Office of Inquisition for YOU KNOW WHO!!  [This is an example of the corruption fostered by Satanists within the Roman Catholic Church, of which many Catholics are completely unaware.]  

Lacking mandatory Oath, creates liability against the bond of the STATE, and every officer-agent-employee who has come to be ‘employed’ thereby. Breach of any underlying writing of the STATE, or State, or state, as an offer to contract in admiralty venue, is a certain “injury in fact” giving rise to a “material injustice” and resultant ‘liability’. There is no longer any question about ‘risk analysis’ or ‘damage assessment’. 

The only real issue is “HOW MUCH IS THE INJURY WORTH”? WHAT PENALTIES should be compelled above the mere “pecuniary” or monetary ‘relief’ to be sought? Treble damages? Punitive damages? Civil or Criminal or BOTH? If Oaths and Bonds have not yet been ascertained for all relevant federal and State officers, agents, and employees, they should be compelled by FOIA request or subpoena duces tecum1 immediately so that the elements of contract and breach of duty by these ‘public servants’ under mandate of relevant Constitutions, statutes, regulations, etc., including the U.C.C. in Admiralty venue can be comprehensively determined; then, a resultant ‘cause of action’ constructed accordingly. 

It is further axiomatic that: “Where a liability in equity arises due to injury by any party, and that party does not also provide a “remedy” for said liability, the injured party has the right and standing to create his own remedy” 

Persons without proper Oaths do not and cannot have proper Bonds OR satisfy the necessary requirements to “hold” a bona fide “Office”, by ‘commission’, “election”, or “appointment”. In short, an ‘Officer’ or “Office Holder” cannot but ‘occupy’ the office under false and misleading pretense, misrepresentation, and FRAUD, which strips the ‘individual’ of ‘law authority’ and ‘immunity’ under well-seasoned law of the land and sea. Brutum fulmen!! 

Bonds that are attached to such juristic ‘persons’ are subject to claim and lien, after “adequate assurance of due performance” has been found lacking pursuant to U.C.C. 2-619. A proper Oath and Bond are but two of the three primary “poles” of “Office” [Oath, Bond, Commission]. One cannot act upon being ‘duly appointed’ or ‘duly elected’ or ‘duly commissioned’ simply by INCORPORATION and CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS lacking bona fide Constitutional nexus is without “law authority”, and therefore has no nexus to the Constitutionally protected ‘Right’ of “due process”. Hence, any act or action taken against any one by any alleged ‘official’, ‘officer’, agent’ or ‘employee’ lacking such nexus is subject to CLAIM and/or COUNTER-CLAIM in Admiralty venue and proceeding. The claim, once perfected after ‘exhausting administrative remedy’ is brought against the Bond and the DUN & BRADSTREET rating of that CORPORATE PERSON will be affected as a consequence. The idea is not to seek an illegitimate claim for merely punitive or monetary purposes, but to seek claim on the basis of protest, dispute, redress, relief, and ‘remedy’!!! S 
__________________________

I need only add that since this article and other information like it has come to the surface and Rod Class has definitively proven that the relationship between the State of North Carolina and the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA is what it is, the STATE franchises have been forced to enter bankruptcy, too, as the claims against them for the injustices perpetrated by their employees quickly became overwhelming. 

This is entirely the fault of those organizations for failure to operate according to the Public Law of this country, and under no circumstance should the people of this country be "presumed" to be sureties liable for the appointments made by foreign bankruptcy trustees and the acts of foreign municipal employees who were never qualified to be bonded or to serve in any public capacity related to us. 

The corporations responsible are trying to shuffle off the liabilities created by their often criminally mis-directed employees as well as their own profligate unauthorized spending back onto the victims of this debacle, and we are saying no and saying it in no uncertain terms. 

We are not the "sureties" for these interlopers.  We are their Priority Creditors and the Priority Creditors of their parent corporations and affiliates as well. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

13 comments:

  1. So, when I lived in North Carolina and went through my divorce and subsequent child custody case for almost 3 years beginning in 1995, can any of this help me now?
    I was removed from my two-year-old home by a county sheriff escort. My court costs for the child custody were enormous. Her attorney would somehow plan it out and got to continue the case every time we went back to court because he intentionally set himself up to be in court in another location. They just hoped that after 18 months I would give up and give her full custody of my two young daughters. Even though we had expert witnesses on her infidelity, DNA evidence that had been processed by a laboratory, DNA material was handled within proper chain of custody compliance rules, multiple pictures of her and the other subject at the motel, almost $10,000 spent on my attorney, I lost custody anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +Fruit Inspector -I am sorry to hear that.
      The courts hate men/father's. Punching bags and ATM's is their view.

      Delete
    2. Yep, I hear that a lot from divorecees that the courts don't even care if the woman is a prostitute, they almost always win custody....Family court is worse than criminal court...it doesnt get any more corrupt and one sided..!! But I have been telling everyone now for ages how important BONDING is for public servants...!! But because of what you said about all the fraud by the legal system, dealing in only "color of law", the city's and counties have opted for the least amount of liability they can get and still function at all....the "pooling of insurance co." which only covers every employee of govt, a minimal amount of liability insurance and everything above that amount, the city of the servant himself is liable for....thats why they always say they are self -insured....Bull...!! They don't even understand what that means..!! They are just taught to say it...and the corrupt DA's dept. and "Risk Mgt." covers or runs interference for the targeted employee...!! That's why I said we should bring a class action suit against the insurance comp. themselves, after giving them NOTICE that they cannot insurinsure fraud under "color of law" without taking FULL UNLIMITED LIABILITY...Not limited liability..!! It's there damn insurance underwriters how are committing the main crime..!!

      Delete
    3. IIRC there is no statute of limitations for Fraud.

      Delete
    4. Fruit, if its any solace to you....Years ago I had a lady friend whose marriage fell apart, for reasons unknown to me, except she is poison to anyone who comes in contact with her.

      So she came to me with a plan she had 'to take him for all he was worth, going to make him pay her mortgage, big child support, and when she got through with him he was only going to be left with $25 a week''. And she wanted me to be a witness for her in court for the divorce.

      Well, from what I could tell, the guy was a pretty decent guy, not at all what she tried to make him out to be; I saw him as a meek guy.

      So I decided to call him and tell him what she planned to do and that I thought she was trying to hand him a dirty deal and I just didn't think she was right at all. I decided to testify instead on his behalf and left her eating crow. He came out with a very fair deal, she got nothing more than what was just fair, she got the house and all the mortgage that went with it. If looks could kill I would have been dead, lol. But I did the right thing, and glad that I did.

      Guys, I tell you, you cannot trust most women.....and yes I am a woman. But I am NOT one of those! I've even had the 'privilege' of seeing some of my son's girlfriends over the years, and how they think. I've heard too many women tell how they married the one who had the most to offer. I've seen it all, heard it all. Even Ms. Markle has an Agenda, believe it. She got herself a sweet guy, but the main prize was she established her 'guaranteed lifetime pension plan' at the age of just 36. She is not as innocent as she appears, lol.

      Delete
    5. FOIA On all parties , use the Rod Class case as precedent , and sue them into abject poverty and demand their deportation

      Delete
  2. I may have posted this before but I recently bought a book from the usa and the author claims that every time you go to court, the court creates a bond on the person assuming you admit to the verbal name (thus contracting) and this bond has a value of 160 grand and the money comes from your cestui que trust of which you are beneficiary unknowingly. There is a legal holder (the Vatican ) and a cestui que trust or beneficiary. Some say they are the beneficiary as they created the trust but not so. The trust owner MUST pass over the trust to the trustee aka legal holder. Not done as you were an infant and a contract with an infant is void ab initio. (from the beginning ). Plus if you are found guilty, there is either monetary consequences or jail or both to you the man/woman directly affecting your wallet or life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +bluecollar- I wish you had some links to share. Would like to read more about it. There is similar and great info here:
      CRIS – Court Registry Investment System
      In matters of pure common sense, it would be a very bad idea to appoint a fox to guard your hen-house. For this reason, it has been a maxim of law for hundreds of years that one cannot settle a matter as an impartial 3rd party when one has any special financial interest in the outcome (other than for due wage compensation). To handle a matter with no special financial interest in the matter means that one has “clean hands”.

      The United States Supreme Court functions actually as a “business”…. We know that the same is true for almost every other court in the world. Therefore, what we are dealing with is a false judicial system. And this leads to the “CRIS” accounts. The acronym CRIS (Court Registry Investment System) account is what connects a false judicial system to the bank; it is the mechanism through which they access funds that were created in your name without your knowledge.

      And how exactly were these funds created? By treating your birth certificate as a financial instrument. For more info on the Birth Certificate, click here.

      In the USA, the legal system is not what lawyers – and the media – tell us it is.

      by AL Whitney (C) copyright 2013
      Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and the AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged.

      Legal researchers Jeanette Triplett and Rod Class located the documents that prove our courts are a branch of the Federal Reserve banking cartel.

      Listen to this 7-minute conversation:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxCIJZI74Oo (7:20)
      More:https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-itnj/cris-court-registry-investment-system/

      Delete
  3. Rundle v Delaware 1852 clearly said that Corporations cannot PLEAD or be IMPLEADED into a court action.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Google Uniform Bonding Code part 3 and download it, and read it. You should be able to make a claim against almost every action they take if the law they are applying is not bonded, and most are not because they cause a tort and violate the Constitution. Every city, county, town has a charter as mentioned in the article. Every public servant must abide by that city charter, which says the city must abide by the constitution. For example the charter for the city and county of Denver mentions the constitution 263 times. Every violation is a claim.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I remember 5 years ago of Robb Ryder speaking in depth on this subject. He stated that nearly all oaths of office were invalid, and the 'official' guidelines that must be followed to make a valid oath.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tK0wiHZxjEo
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shTYHxP6cCw

    This is a stand alone remedy for the travesty done to us all.
    Publicly expose, and remove many of the top 'actors' in a concerted effort, and watch as the house of cards collapse.
    Old age, and my tin foil hat has addled my brain somewhat, but I would love to help with a group of dedicated people to start these actions. I do know from personal experience that when done in triplicate, it becomes truth.
    Let me be clear, My wish is to cause these actions to remove bond protections against all persons in Congress, Supreme Court, and possibly even the Executive office. Then work our way down the list of ALL Federal Judges and Prosecutors. All orders, and judgements must be vacated, and set for re-hearing in the proper venue. Of course it would be easier to nullify the bonding company itself for fraudulent operations, and declaring all oaths null and void.
    Note; I rarely re-visit my comments, so if someone wishes to belittle my comments, or slur me in some fashion, don't waste your time. Deeds not words matter.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just watched this video and made the following comment. ROD GOT IT WRONG about the guns and my comment told him why. EVERYONE CONTINUES TO GET IT WRONG AND THAT IS WHY WE ARE IN THE TROUBLE WE ARE IN! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW4JIJ-SJ1c

    "ROD errs in believing his rights exist in DC. They do not!WHEN WE ARE IN DC (THE UNITED STATES) WE HAVE NO RIGHTS! That 10 sq mile of land was given to the UNITED STATES, via Constitution for them to conduct business. That 10sq miles is OUTSIDE of America. It is its own city state. Wholely separate from the country known as America. It is no different than VATICAN CITY OR LONDON CITY being completely separate from Rome and Italy or London and England. The laws of those CITY STATES are their own. They are under NO LAWS of the country, because their land is not part of the country. Those city states are countries unto themselves! This is crucial to understand, in law and freedom. ROD absolutely had no gun rights WITHIN DC. Americans are foreigners to DC. That LAND, is the UNITED STATES and it is not part of the country known as the LAND OF AMERICA." When we are in France, we are under the JURISDICTION of France. It's the same thing. When you are in DC (THE UNITED STATES), Vatican City or London City...you are not in America, Italy or England. You are in the countries DC, Vatican City and London City.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is true, but I believe Rod may have been working under the assumption most people don’t know DC is a foreign country.
      They don’t exactly announce this, so for the unaware DC should be America ground zero. How ironic nothing could be further from the truth. And one would think you have rights... so how do they keep their secrets if Rod exposes the truth? Or do they care if people find out? They’ve become exceedingly arrogant in their evil ways.
      Or maybe just keep your guns out of DC and call it a day. We have bigger issues to deal with...
      Blessings!!

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.