The US Citizen Blues

By Anna Von Reitz

Let's make it clear that while you persist in calling yourself a "US Citizen" and acting "as" a US Citizen, you are laboring under a number of profound disadvantages. 

"US Citizens" have no access to the Constitutions nor to their guarantees and never have had. The political status of a "United States Citizen" (Territorial) and also that of "Citizen of the United States" (Municipal) was created by the Constitutions, and therefore, obviously, people adopting either one or both of these political status obligations are NOT Parties to the Constitutions. By definition. 

The most "US Citizens" have is a promise of "Equal Civil Rights" which gets suspended during "National Emergencies"--- and so far as the corporations in DC are concerned, they are in a near-constant "state of emergency" as a result of their own mismanagement. 

Some specific rights, like the right to Habeas Corpus, have even been suspended by Executive Order of the Commander in Chief since 1863. So there are numerous exceptions where even when there isn't a "national emergency", US Citizens are denied truly Equal Civil Rights.

The point is --- what Congress gives, the Congress --- or the President --- can take away.  Why?  Because "Civil Rights" are privileges conferred by the "Civil Government" --- that is, the Municipal Government of the United States. They have nothing to do with the "Natural and Unalienable Rights" that Americans are heir to.

US Citizens cannot own land in this country, with the result that they are considered tenants not landlords, and in all cases where US Citizens have homes or land in this country, they have only tenant rights. 

If they are Territorial Citizens, the Municipal Government acts as landlord.  If they are Municipal Citizens, the Territorial Government acts as landlord.  And in no case do the US Citizens actually own anything.  They are "presumed" to be "residing" here on a temporary basis, providing governmental services to us, the "missing" Americans.  House-sitters, in other words.

United States Citizens are subject to statutory law and function as Legal Fiction Persons.  They cannot access the Public Law or even The Law of Peace which the military is obligated to give us (AR 27-161-1). 

Municipal Citizens of the United States and their slaves known as "citizens of the United States" are also taxpayers by definition. They, too, are all legal fiction PERSONS.

So there is no advantage to claiming to be a "US Citizen" of either stripe and never has been. 

Except for getting a federal paycheck and other payola, there is no reason that any American in their right mind would ever knowingly or willingly choose to be considered a "US Citizen". 

Since the US Citizens are all Taxpayers by definition, and Federal Corporations in DC have had a mighty motivation to count everyone in sight as "US Citizens" and to make it difficult for the rest of us who are not employed by the "Federal Government" to (1) claim our birthrights and (2) live in a militaristic society dominated by our employees and all their regimentation.

Nonetheless, unless they wish to be declared in open rebellion and guilty of committing treason and violation of international law and risk having their assumed commercial contracts voided, the corporations in DC are obligated to recognize your claim of either American State National status (no obligation to any government, except to keep the peace and cause no harm) or American State Citizen (involved in staffing the actual State Government you are owed). 

The specific Offices responsible for recognizing your correct political status are: The United States Secretary of State, and The United States Attorney General's Office, and right after them, The United States Secretary of the Treasury. 

On the local level, the State of State Governors, the State Secretaries of State, the State Attorney Generals, the Commissioners of the Departments of Natural Resources, and the District Attorneys are all obligated to recognize and provide the protections of your American State National and/or American State Citizen political status. 

And to a man, they religiously fail to do so and get away with this "neglect" because nobody is claiming their rightful political status as Americans and nobody is holding them accountable.

Now, obviously, most Americans are not aware that they have been "presumed upon" and misidentified as US Citizens.  They have gone about their lives thinking, "Well, of course, I am an American!  Any fool can see that!" --- but "Misery Loves Company" and the members of Congress are an odd mix of clueless and criminal and they are greedy for tax dollars and power--- with the result that you have been systematically misidentified as a "volunteer" and as a "US Citizen".

What are you going to do about it?  Well, first of all, you need to know who and what you are and the fact that your nationality is determined by your place of birth on Earth.  You were born within the borders of an American State, on its land and soil, and by definition you are an American, not a "US Citizen".

Your physically defined State is your Nation.  You are a Texan, a Wisconsinite, a New Yorker.... that is your nationality, and more generally, you are an American. 

Anyone who says differently is "mis-characterizing" you and is guilty of crime. This is a crime under the Geneva Conventions.  Anyone who presumes that you are a "US Citizen" is "impersonating" you, because all "US Citizens" are merely "Legal Persons" --- having no ability to function as recognizable physical entities.  Impersonation is a crime, too.  So is kidnapping, inland piracy, and conspiracy against the Constitutions. 

The people making these false claims against you, to the effect that you are a "US Citizen", can literally hang for it.  That's why, when you bring it to their attention, they should all be very cordial and eager to recognize the fact that you are not and, in most cases, never were, any form of "US Citizen". 

Unfortunately, some of them are intent upon securing tax revenue and claims of oppressive power over the American People --- like "Draft Boards" --- and they will try to bluff and bully you into "accepting" the status of "US Citizen" even though you are not getting a paycheck from their corporations.  They will even try to enforce citizenship obligations upon you as a "contractual obligation". 

And this is where you must have your own ducks in order, because they have been plotting against you since your own babyhood and have been collecting "evidence" that you are a "US Citizen", beginning with a Birth Certificate issued by the local British Territorial Government franchise operating as a "State of State". 

Ironically, this document, the BC, is also the primary evidence against them. 

Once you prove via affirmed Witness Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit (two Witnesses needed) that you are the man or woman whose birth occurred on your birth day and at that place and of that parentage, it is also apparent that you were a baby at the time they snatched you away from your natural and native jurisdiction on the land and human trafficked you into their foreign jurisdiction on the sea.

The Birth Certificate is evidence of crime, the least of which is "unconscionable" contracting practices by the Territorial Government -- which is why when you bring it forward to the District Attorneys and the State Secretary of State and say the Magic Words, the doors welcoming you home should swing open wide and any troubles that you have with THEM should disappear like morning fog. 

And if not, you go straight to the US Secretary of State and demand recognition as an American State National and/or American State Citizen.

Be aware, you cannot enjoy your birthright as an American and also claim that you are any kind of "US Citizen".  This would allow the employees of foreign corporations to take over our land and soil and destroy our country --- and not just on paper.  This is why our States do not allow Dual Citizenship. 

So as the saying goes, "Use it or Lose it".  Claim it, or color it gone.

Write that letter to the State-of-State Secretary of State and fully inform him or her that you are claiming your birthright political status and that you are acting as a Lawful Person and that you expect to be recognized as an American, not a US Citizen of either kind. 

Send a copy to the State-of-State Attorney General, the Governor, the DNR Commissioner, and the US Secretary of State.  For good measure, send a copy to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

Explain your political status and the dirty trick that has been played on you and millions of other innocent Americans by their own employees.  Demand recognition of your true political status and release from all presumptions of "US Citizen" status. 

Tell them forthrightly that you are a peaceable Texan (or Minnesotan or....) owed the Law of Peace from the military and the full force of the Constitutions and that you do not "voluntarily" accept any presumptions otherwise.

If you are angry, you have a right to be angry.  This entire country and its people have been outrageously imposed upon and abused by both the British Monarchs and the Popes, and all the while they have been prattling on about the importance of "Law" while they have been breaking it.  And also seeking to weasel out of their treaties and commercial contracts. 

Hold them feet first to the fire by all means making them accountable --- morally, commercially, and internationally for the harm they have done to you and to your country. 

But it all begins with realizing that you are NOT a "US Citizen", establishing your claim to your birthright status on the public record, learning to use the evidence effectively against them, and using both lawful and legal process against them should they offer any resistance to your claims.

In short order --- what must you do to establish your identity and enforce your birthrights as an American?

1. Secure multiple certified copies of the Birth Certificate that was issued in your name.

2. Secure at least two competent affirmed Witness Testimonies in the Form of an Affidavit identifying you (your photo) at your current address as "the" man or woman whose birthday, birth place and parentage are recorded on the BC.

3. Do the Paperwork to formally give Notice of the return your Lawful Name to the land and soil of your birth state, etc.

4. Learn the Spiel and learn who to give it to--- the DA's, the State of State Secretaries of State, the US Attorneys, the District Attorneys, and anyone having anything to do with the court system. 

5. "There has been a mistake..... "

6. Present the "Mandatory Notice" required by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

7. Present (if the situation warrants it) a Notice of Liability, making it clear that each Office-Holder is personally responsible and accountable.

8. Acknowledgement and Acceptance: "I know you are operating under the 1934 Amendment to the Trading with the Enemy Act and I accept that you can't speak about it thanks to 18 USC 472 and I duly accept your Oath of Office-- but I can speak about it.  I am not any form of US Citizen and not an "Enemy" within the jurisdiction, meaning, or intent of that Act, and I am serving Notice to you in both your official and personal capacity that I am an American and that I claim and hold my birthright political status on the land and soil of this country as a Lawful Person and I have returned from any presumption that I am "over the sea".

9. Action: "I wish for my true political status as an American State National to be recognized now and forever afterward by my loyal employees and I wish you to take whatever action is necessary to sort out the paperwork and spread the news of my return so that: (1) my name is placed on a do not detain list, (2) a proper ID not related to any "Driver License" is issued', (3) any property listed under my NAME is removed from the Tax Rolls, (4) all pending Territorial or Municipal Court actions related to my name are expunged and eliminated; (5) any "federal" liens or garnishments premised on the idea that I ever was a federal employee, volunteer, or citizen issued against my name are removed." 

10. Guarantee: "It is my intent to live my life at peace as a Lawful Person, to uphold the Constitutions and the Public Law, and I do not propose to judge, blame, or harm anyone. I am here to claim what is mine, no more, no less, and to enforce the treaties, commercial contracts, and guarantees I am owed."

Is this situation clear enough, even for the boneheads among us? 

When you actually work for the Federal Government, you are obligated to act as a "US Citizen", when you are an "immigrant" in process of becoming naturalized, when you are a "dependent" of a Federal Employee, when you are claiming political asylum in the United States from another country, when you are knowingly and willingly occupying a federal political office, when you are knowingly and willingly acting as an officer of a federally chartered corporation--- in all those situations, you are obligated to act as a "US Citizen", but otherwise, you are under no such obligation and under no such political status--- unless you continue to claim such political status out of ignorance.

And absent a paycheck, etc., what other reason could there ever be for an American to adopt "US Citizenship"?  Why would you give up your Natural and Unalienable Rights for here-again-there-again "Civil Rights"?  Why would you agree to tax yourself (voluntarily) for up to 60% of your earnings?  Why would you subject yourself to more than 80,000 million statutory laws?  Why would you give up your property rights and assets?  And live as a "tenant" on your own land?  Why would you ever knowingly agree to any of this?

You wouldn't.

This has been a totally unconscionable contracting process imposed upon you from Day One.  Now that you are an adult, it's time to wake up and take action in your own behalf and the sooner the better. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

State Citizens v. US Citizens Status

By Anna Von Reitz

It has come as a great shock to some people to learn that there are two completely separate political statuses in this country that are the result of service obligations of public employees known as either “United States Citizens” or “Citizens of the United States” and those being served, the People of the States.

This fundamental fact should be taught to every schoolchild in America, but as a result of lapses and the self-interest of our employees, has not been.

The unincorporated States of the Union acting by and through their unincorporated Holding Company, The United States of America, are the actual Landlords and Employers of the Federal Government, both Territorial and Municipal.

The People of the States are the owners and operators of the States of the Union. We are owed the Good Faith Service of all Federal Employees and Agencies and the prompt and correct consideration of our proper political status, once we claim it and properly, explicitly enunciate our Will to be recognized as American State Nationals or American State Citizens.

A brief citational history was recently forwarded to me by a reader and as I like the way this is organized, I am publishing it as an education “short course” in the subject and as proof, if any is needed, that Americans are naturally Lawful Persons and occupy a political status separate from US Citizens:

1. State Citizens v. US Citizens

2. “There are two classes of citizens, citizens of the United States and of the State. And one may be a citizen of the former without being a citizen of the latter” — Gardina v. Board of Registers 48 So. 788, 169 Ala. 155 (1909)

3. Federal citizenship is a municipal franchise domiciled in the District of Columbia, and the political rights of federal citizens are franchises which they hold as privileges at the legislative discretion of Congress.” —(Murphy v. Ramsey , 114 U.S. 15 (1885)).

4. “The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States.” — US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957

5. “Therefore, the U.S. citizens [citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity.” — Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.

6. “A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” — Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)

7. “There is in our Political System, a government of each of the several states and a government of the United States Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own.” — US vs. Cruikshank, 92 US 542,

8. …the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States do not necessarily include all the rights protected by the first eight amendments to the Federal constitution against the powers of the Federal government.” — Maxwell v Dow, 20 S.C.R. 448, at pg 455;

9. “The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the “citizenship” to the agencies of government.” — City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

10. “…it might be correctly said that there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States. … A citizen of any one of the States of the Union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing.” — Ex Parte Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. Rep. 300

11. This can also be confirmed in the definitions section of Title 5 USC, Title 26 USC, and Title 1 USC.

12. Therefore a US citizen is a piece of property. If you read any of those old court cases prior to the civil war where slavery was the issue, the debate was ALWAYS over property rights, therefore a US citizen, is a SLAVE.

13. The Fourteenth Amendment defines what a US citizen is;
“Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.…”

14. The so-called Fourteenth Amendment criminally converts US citizenship completely upside down from what the founding fathers intended.

15. A US citizen is a corporation:

16. Summary of 6 pages of Congressional Record , June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.

17. “…it is evident that they [US citizens] have not the political ‘[ rights]’ which are vested in citizens of the States. They are not constituents of any community in which is vested any sovereign power of government. Their position partakes more of the character of subjects than of citizens. They are subject to the laws of the United States, but have no voice in its management. If they are allowed to make laws, the validity of these laws is derived from the sanction of a Government in which they are not represented. Mere citizenship they may have, but the political ‘[rights]’ of citizens they cannot enjoy…” — People v. De La Guerra,40 Cal. 311, 342 (A.D. 1870)

18. Del Sharp United States Code that uses “American national” while maintaining no such status as 14th Amendment “naturalized citizen of the United States”.

19. 8 U.S.C. § 1502 : Certificate of nationality issued by Secretary of State for person not a naturalized citizen of United States for use in proceedings of a foreign state.

20. The Secretary of State is authorized to issue, in his discretion and in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by him, a certificate of nationality for any person not a naturalized citizen of the United States who presents satisfactory evidence that he is an AMERICAN NATIONAL and that such certificate is needed for use in judicial or administrative proceedings in a foreign state. Such certificate shall be solely for use in the case for which it was issued and shall be transmitted by the Secretary of State through appropriate official channels to the judicial or administrative officers of the FOREIGN STATE in which it is to be used.

21. Corpus Juris Secundum § 883, [t]he United States government is a FOREIGN CORPORATION with respect to a state.

22. 8 USC § 1101(a)(21), [t]he term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.”

23. 8 USC § 1101(a)(22), [t]he term “national of the United States” means
(A) a citizen of the United States, or
(B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent
allegiance to the United States.

24. American national ≠ national/citizen of the United States

25. These are TWO distinct status’ within the American system. The former is a freeman, the latter is a voluntary slave subject to the jurisdiction thereof created by section 1 of the 14th Amendment. It is a FEDERALLY CREATED capacity/title that owes allegiance to it.

I trust that this is the “end” of any debate about the issue.

If you wish to be considered a “US Citizen” of any kind, you may adopt that status and act as a Legal Person. If you wish to retain your natural born capacity and wish to act as a Lawful Person and act exclusively as an “American State National” or “American State Citizen”, you may declare your intent and claim/reclaim and record your natural political status as an American — which is what I recommend and what our paperwork process is designed to accomplish.

At no time before or since the so-called American Civil War have any of our States been engaged in any form of warfare since 1814; we are owed the Law of Peace, AR 27-161-1 from the Territorial Government and agreed upon Service from the Municipal Government, which, with respect to us, is limited to perform its operations within the ten miles square of the District of Columbia.

Those of us who declare ourselves and record our political status as peaceful American State Citizens are owed all protections and guarantees of both The Constitution of the United States of America (Territorial Government) and The Constitution of the United States (Municipal Government) without any presumption of the existence of US Citizenship obligations of any kind.

In the same token, we are obligated by those same venerable agreements to not interfere in the functions of the Federal Government and to “stay in our lane” in the day to day operation of our own affairs. If we claim our State National or State Citizen status, we accept it as our singular political status and/or obligation of citizenship, and we do not claim any other political status in conflict of interest.

So, if you are a “US Citizen” you cannot at the same time be considered an “American State National” or “American State Citizen” by any State of the Union, even though your Federal Employer may allow you to claim Dual Citizenship during your period of service employment and may recognize your actual nationality as that of an American.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Why they say you have "No Standing" in the courts.

Why you have no rights as the courts in the whole country see it now!

As I understand the law and what has been done in this country, there is a pretty clear reason why the American people have "no standing" in the courts and why Obama's eligibility and other issues people have attempted to bring into suit have been rejected by the courts.

First, there are two nationalities in this country that you might call political "status". One is the U.S. citizen and one is what I will refer to as the American national, which formerly was a Citizen on one of the Sovereign States of the union. Since the states have become agencies of the federal corporation in D.C. the sovereign state is currently non-existent. Hence we are of the nationality of our previously sovereign state but can no longer claim to be a citizen of the STATE OF. Hence the term American National.

The U.S. citizen has NO RIGHTS. They now have only privileges granted by the corporation which are called civil rights ( a deceptive term indeed) instead of natural rights or God given rights. The U.S. corporation and its agencies are the creator of this fictional entity called a U.S. citizen. They created that fictional status to act upon and they also have lawful control of it (as its creator). They can grant a privilege or they can take it away. The maxim in law is that "he who partakes of the benefit must endure the penalty". The Supreme Court has held the same thing several times.

Because the system has been set up in such a way that virtually everything is considered a "benefit" of being in their system most people have unwittingly volunteered into the status of being a U.S. citizen and indeed claim the title quite proudly! In truth they are proud to be Americans, but they do not know the difference and cannot distinguish between the two. U.S. citizens were proclaimed to be "enemies of the state" back in 1934 during the Roosevelt administration. What we see today from Washington makes it obvious and in your face that such is the case.

The current Constitution of THE UNITED STATES is the corporate charter for the municipal government of Washington D.C. The truth is that it is a bankrupt entity that currently exists in name only and is merely a vehicle being used to fleece Americans and build an empire for the creditors using our military. As a bankrupt entity it has no lawful authority to function whatsoever. Those claiming to be the status of a U.S. citizen are claiming a political status created by the 14th amendment and they waive their God given rights in exchange for civil rights....ie privileges. Unfortunately most people do not realize that the U.S. citizen cannot complain of being damaged personally by the corporation because they must endure the penalties of participation in the benefits of the corporate system. Hence the U.S. citizen has no standing to claim damage or violation of any rights; they do not have any.

Furthermore, the U.S. citizen is a fictional entity which is corporate in nature. It is a legal fiction created legislatively by congress. A fiction cannot actually be damaged. How can you damage the tooth fairy or Santa Claus? In the real world of substance they do not exist so they cannot actually be damaged. Again, the claim of damage has "no standing" for a U.S. citizen.

So, if the U.S. citizen has no standing to claim personal damage in the courts for constitutional violations, what about the American National who does not claim to be a U.S. citizen and does not partake of the benefits of the system? Well, basically all the courts have become legislative courts. They deal only with fictional corporate entities and the contracts between the fictions. An American national finds that neither the corporate system, their rules, or their courts have anything to do with them. An American is not "subject to" nor within the jurisdiction of these administrative courts which are administering corporate affairs; in this case the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES.

American nationals cannot claim personal damage by the corporate government because they are outside the corporate rules administered by the legislature. If the rules do not apply to you then you cannot be damaged by them. Hence the sovereign American has no standing in their courts either. Fictions (tooth fairy) cannot really damage a living man.

So, what is the purpose of the courts as they exist at present? It is simple. The U.S. government and all its agencies, which include all the state governments, counties, cities, and courts are now under the control of the creditor to the UNITED STATES INC., which went into bankruptcy in 1933. The congress serves as the trustee and the president is the chief administrator of the bankruptcy acting on behalf of the creditor, the FEDERAL RESERVE and/or it owners.

The courts and the police are revenue collectors extracting monies from the population of U.S. citizens as the penalty or charge for the participation in the limited liability scheme of plunder. The corporate scheme was merely a way to apply the national debt to the people of the country and a device to plunder our nation using operations of law. Some fees and charges go to building and supporting the collection mechanism itself and some go to the creditors as profits. It is about like the tables in Vegas. The house will always win in the end. You may enjoy a few winnings along the way in the form of perceived benefits, but in the end the house will clean you, and our nation, out. Any small winnings you might enjoy in the interim will be extracted from you in the end. How many end up broke in Vegas? How many of our elderly die broke? How broke have we become as a nation? 

If U.S. citizens have no standing in the courts to protect rights and the American national is outside the system and its courts, then their is no avenue available to protect God given rights or our natural rights within their existing system. You cannot argue Constitutional rights because, as the courts have said, the Constitution was a contract but the people were not a party to it. Our rights come from God not the Constitution. The Bill of Rights did not grant us those rights; it was restrictive in nature and was to restrict the government. The only protector of our God given rights is man, who inherited them, and God. There is no entity between man and the creator in the chain of command.

neo

Regardless of how this was done we still have a constitution and the Supreme court has backed that up in the Mack/Printz decision.  It's up to us to defend that and enforce that.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1478.ZO.html

Do Juries have the absolute power to nullify bad laws?

This (jury nullification) is one of the few peaceful ways that remain to attempt some justice and resolution of the many problems in the system. However, most of what I have seen on the subject seems to imply something less than a complete understanding of the system these clever BAR members have set up.

It is absolutely true that under the common law and in a court of "law" the people make the law and the decision of the jury of the people cannot be appealed or overruled. Their decision is final as the people are the highest authority. It is with that vote that usurpation of power by over zealous legislatures and prosecutors are held in check. It is/was perhaps the most important power/vote of the people.

That said, the above is not what actually exists in this country at present. That is not to say that a juror cannot act to nullify or hang a jury over a bad law, for most assuredly they can attempt to do so even in today's courts. It is not legal by the corporate definition of procedure, but they aren't likely to challenge it openly because it would run the risk of exposing their fraud.

I do think, however, that it might be good to also understand the reality of the system and what they are doing. 

First, these are no longer courts of law. They are administrative courts conducting administrative hearings dealing with corporate business. Call them private courts dealing with private, closed society, corporate internal affairs. Inside that private closed society they have jurisdiction only over the members of their closed society or corporate employees/affiliates/ franchisees. They are dealing in their commercial corporate policies and not LAW.

They are holding administrative hearings regarding corporate business....corporate policies. They often refer to it as "public policy" but they are using and administering private copyrighted rules they called by various names such as "code", "statutes", "Acts", and public policy, but all are "color of law" used to administer corporate affairs.

The court administrator is no longer a judge but merely an administrator of corporate business and conflicts between corporate entities....internal affairs, if you will. They do not argue the law or discuss the law, they only consider the "facts". The administrator often tells the jury that he/she will "tell the jury what the law is" and that is because they are determining corporate policy and the "law" or policy is whatever they say it is. 

But what of the jury?

Well, if you look at a jury summons I believe you will find that somewhere on there it "qualifies" a potential juror as a "U.S. citizen". That means little to most people and, if anything, most people consider themselves special or privileged because they believe themselves to be a U.S. citizen. Without question they mark the summons accordingly claiming that "status". It IS special, but nothing like people think it is.

Interestingly, you will find that you can neither sit upon one of their juries nor vote if you select the option that you are not a U.S. citizen. That is proof positive that you are dealing with an exclusive society in which only members may participate. If you are a "member" of the closed private society you are also "subject" to it as per the 14th amendment. That means you have exchanged rights for "privileges and immunities". 

The point is that, if you claim to be a U.S. citizen, you have forfeited your right to nullify and become "subject to" their rule by fiat corporate policy as you are a participating member of the commercial corporate scheme and claiming to be a member or citizen is evidence of your participation by your own claim. 

If you make the claim and sit on one of "their" juries you are no longer a common law juror but serving only in an "advisory" capacity for the administrator. The administrator can, and often does, punish jurors and most certainly makes attempts to control them in many ways. You "subject" to it yourself by claiming to be subject to him/her in claiming the status of U.S. citizen and the privilege to sit in their jury box. Such behavior by a judge is not possible in a true court of law.

On the other hand, if you select that you are NOT a U.S. citizen on their forms then you are not "qualified" to serve on their juries. In a very real sense, this prevents a sovereign American, seeking justice according to the common law, from being able to seat a truly impartial jury, actually argue the law, or to obtain justice and a fair hearing. 

Frankly, with very few exceptions, it must be acknowledged that most U.S. citizens are completely unfamiliar with the law, are likely to let an administrator TELL them what their law is, and their opinions are seriously tainted with their own brainwashed views of what should be law. 

Those are basically the underlying circumstances which exist. With that said, can a juror select that they are a U.S. citizen on the summons and then act to nullify bad laws by hanging the jury or blocking a conviction? Yes. Why, because, in the vast majority of cases the court, prosecutor, and the system as a whole prefer NOT to expose the truth about what is going on or why.

My personal suspicions are that if the nullification becomes to big a thorn in their side that they will do more plea bargains, avoid using juries more than they already do, start cracking down on jurors, and various other devices to counter the problem short of exposing the truth.

I do not discourage the practice of nullification. As I stated previously, it is perhaps one of the few remaining methods of peaceful change. 

The really diabolical aspect to their system and to our miseducation is the many repercussions one faces as a result of providing them with prima facie evidence of one's political status by claiming to be a U.S. citizen subject. Most people think the claim merely differentiates them from illegal aliens, but that is far from the truth.

Americans are not illegal aliens, nor is "U.S. citizen" synonymous with American. The status of U.S. citizen is a political status and a title, or term, given to a member of the closed commercial corporate society created in the 1800's. It does allow corporate privileges and the commercial system does exclude people who refuse claim of membership or of the status.  

Most know about "voter registration" and may now be aware of the jury summons question, but a careful check of most every document one completes in the system asks the question or questions...are you a U.S. citizen and/or do you "reside WITHIN THE UNITED STATES? One would do well to learn the meaning of those "terms" because, as they are being used, they mean something entirely different that the average man would ever suspect.

The IRS is but one of many agencies which use such things as a completed jury summons to establish prima facie evidence of your U.S. citizenship which makes you "subject to" their jurisdiction. 

My point is that serving on the jury is a catch 22. Be FULLY INFORMED above all else.

neo

Straight Talk to David Straight

 
By Anna Von Reitz

This is part of what you are not grasping, so let me ask you --- is it possible to be "at home" and "away from home" at the same time?  

Can you be on a ship at sea and ploughing a field back home at the same time?  

No, you cannot --- and it is the same way with the different apples and oranges we are discussing. 

You can be born in California and declare that you are a Californian by birthright and you can be recognized as an American State National ---- that is your nationality. 

But when you adopt a foreign political status, we are no longer talking about nationality.  We are talking about citizenship or non-citizenship.  

Citizenship is a vocation --- a job in which you serve the government.   

Just as you can choose to be a bartender or not, Americans have the right to choose whether they are "citizens" or not.  

They also have the right to choose whatever citizenship status they adopt, if they adopt any at all. 

This is not true worldwide.   

Many countries, including England, maintain that citizenship accrues to you at birth and you have no choice but to serve the government all your days. 

As an American you can: (1) choose not to be a citizen and just live your life as a Free Man;  (2) adopt State Citizenship and serve your State of the Union; (3) adopt U.S. Citizenship and "serve abroad" in the international jurisdiction of the sea as a British resident;  (4) adopt Municipal citizenship of the United States and "serve abroad" in the jurisdiction of the air as a resident of the District of Columbia; (5) potentially, once the American Federal Republic is restored, you could adopt United States Citizenship (different than U.S. Citizenship) --- there is a lengthy process to do this described in the old Naturalization Acts --- and "serve abroad" as a Resident of the Municipality of Washington, DC.  

So there are five (5) possibilities: 

1. American Free Man, Non-citizen (no government job obligations at all) 

2. American State Citizen (State of the Union job)

3. U.S. Citizen (foreign British Territorial Admiralty job)

4. Municipal citizen of the United States (foreign District Maritime citizen job) 

5. United States Citizen (American foreign service job requiring Municipal residency)

Notice that --- U.S. Citizen, Municipal citizen of the United States, and United States Citizen are all foreign citizenships from the perspective of the American Free Man and the American State Citizens.  

That is, U.S. Citizen, Municipal citizen of the United States, and United States Citizen all work for foreign governments and operate in foreign jurisdictions of law. 

Many Americans find this hard to comprehend. 

They think of that thing in Washington, DC, as "their" government because it is supposed to do work for them under contracts called "constitutions", and because many District Employees were born in this country, they additionally believe that these governments are American --- but they are not. 

The only quasi-American Government that is supposed to be in Washington, DC, is the American Foreign Service which we intended to administer through the original Federal Republic --- but that hasn't been possible since 1860, so the work got reshuffled and the Pope's Municipal Government simply usurped those roles intended for United States Citizens. 

Thus, our country has been commandeered by foreign powers since 1860, and all the while, Americans have thought that everything was hunky-dory. 

When Americans join the military services they unknowingly adopt the U.S. Citizenship political status, and unless they inform their Branch Commander otherwise once they are discharged from the military, they are presumed to voluntarily retain that status forevermore. 

U.S. Citizenship is a British Territorial job and as a condition of your continued volunteer job you are considered a Subject of the British Monarch, a Territorial Foreign Situs Trust, collateral (together with all your property assets) for the debts of the United States of America, Incorporated, and an Indentured Servant for the duration of your service. 

You also lose all Constitutional Guarantees owed to Americans, can not actually own land in this country (only a British Trust "title" to land, which the Queen holds "for" you), and as a tenant on (what used to be) your own land, you have to pay property taxes, easement assessments, etc., etc., etc.  You also become subject to the Queen's law in your country. 

So, here you are, going around, teaching everyone that it's okay to be a U.S. Citizen --- and it is, but..... there are downsides.  More recently, you have even been suggesting by reference to 8 USC 12 that it's even possible for them to be "United States Citizens", apparently because the British Territorials are preparing to front a British Territorial version of our Federal Republic and confuse everyone some more--- though we won't allow that.   

The problem, David, is that you aren't telling people what U.S. Citizenship actually means and what they give up in the course of adopting U.S. Citizenship.  And as far as all this talk about a "new" Federal Republic, you aren't telling people that this could only be a British-affiliated entity calling itself "a" Federal Republic --- if it comes to pass, it won't be American. 

The American Government is run by Americans adopting their own citizenship --- which is American State Citizenship.  And it's only the American State Citizens who actually have the authority to reconstruct both the Confederation of States and the American Federal Republic.  

In the meantime, our venerable Federation of States is the only American Government operating in international and global jurisdiction, just as it did from 1776-1781.  

If you and all the other U.S. Citizen volunteers really want to do something to help America and your fellow-Americans, and actually want to help restore the American Government and do the right thing, then the first thing you need to do is come home.  Resign your job as a foreign citizen working in a foreign jurisdiction of the law, and if you want to serve, serve your own State Government instead.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Writ of Error and Notice of Liability

 By Anna Von Reitz

As we have adequately explained to the world in two earlier International Public Notices sent to all the appropriate Principals and Agents, the British Territorial United States. and its personnel known as U.S. Citizens, do not represent us in any substantive capacities related to our physical and material assets apart from serving as: (1) our Trustees on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways when we actually put to sea; (2) those responsible for the Territorial duties outlined under the Northwest Ordinance; (3) those designated to regulate the interstate manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol, tobacco, and firearms.  

It follows that they do not represent us as the Receivers or Beneficiaries of the UNITED STATES bankruptcy, either.  

As usual, they went behind our backs, misrepresented themselves as our "representatives" in these matters, did not provide notice of the bankruptcy or otherwise "fully inform" their employers, and continued to operate as rogue entities.  

Everyone in receipt of this International Public Notice has cause to know that we are Americans and are State Nationals --- not U.S. Citizens --- and that our Government is in Session.  

Everyone in receipt of this Writ of Error and Notice of Liability has cause to know that  their proposed settlement of the UNITED STATES bankruptcy in their own favor is a constructive fraud attempting to defraud the actual Parties of Interest and the Lawful Inheritors/Beneficiaries of both (1) the British Territorial "Persons" --- corporate franchises of the United States of America, Inc., created under the False Registration scheme that misidentifies American babies as U.S. Citizens, and, (2) subsequently,  the "US PERSONS" that were derived from the purported Estates of these British Territorial "Persons" who never actually existed. 

What begins as fraud, ends as fraud. 

The Perpetrators have again outsmarted themselves. 

They thought that by  secretly seizing upon American babies and changing their political status to that of British Territorial "U.S. Citizens" and by later listing our names as "lost at sea, presumed dead" ----and having these fictional entities declared legally dead, they could separate us from our lawful and legal interest in our own names and assets, and prevent us from claiming back our "reversionary trust interest" and dissolving these fictitious British Territorial "Persons" named after us.  

But we've done so, just the same. 

They also colluded with the Holy Roman Empire service providers to establish third party Municipal franchises in our NAMES, which purportedly held the Estates of these fictional British Territorial U.S. Citizens--- which would, in theory, allow them to claim all the assets held in these federal municipal ESTATE trusts, if any such British Territorial U.S. Citizen ever existed, or was ever "lost at sea". 

But having failed the First Cause, they have also failed the Second Cause. 

There never was any actual British Territorial U.S. Citizen named Anna Maria Riezinger, and my Mother lived long enough to record her Testimony in the form of an Unrebutted Affidavit that stands on the Public Records of Jackson County, Wisconsin, repudiating any claim or supposition that I was ever a US Person or U.S. Citizen, either one.  

Like millions of other Americans, I have been the victim of a complex clandestine identity theft scheme resulting in human trafficking on paper --- both known crimes.  

Both fictional entities, the civilly dead U.S. Citizen named after Anna Maria Riezinger, and the federal municipal trust, ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER purportedly containing "her" assets, have to be dissolved as if they never were.  

I am owed back all right, title, interest, and substance attached to my Good Name and national sovereignty, including any and all beneficial interest in the federal Cestui Que Vie Trust established under my name, and likewise, any and all right, title, interest, and substance thought to be vested in any prior fictional British Territorial Person, a U.S. Citizen "franchise" merely named after me.  

As I am alive and have proven that I am both alive and am the adult woman, Anna Maria Riezinger, who was born on June 6th 1956, in Neillsville, Wisconsin, and have a Medical Doctor's Affidavit to prove it, there can be no contest over any aspect of my claim.  My Mother's Witness seeming to agree that I was ever a U.S. Citizen is firmly rebutted and the similar Witness of Dr. Robert Krohn is also contraindicated by the signed Testimony/Affidavit of Dr. Ilona Farr.  A similar roster of evidences applies to my husband, James Clinton Belcher. 

So there you have it, two lies do not make a single truth.  

Two fictional identities attached to a single baby in an attempt to latch onto her and her lawful estate, remain two big fat fraudulent self-interested lies that have been handed back to the Perpetrators responsible for the existence of these fictional foreign "persons" named after me, together with a claim against their Usufructuary Duty to hold me and my estate harmless from any charge or ill-effect resulting from the existence of either one of these foreign franchise corporations. 

The entire enchilada is owed back to me, unharmed, made good, and intact ---- and in my proper ownership, too, under my proper sovereignty. 

I was the "presumed donor" at the head of the line, first in time, that was misrepresented as a British Territorial U.S. Citizen franchise, dba "Anna Maria Riezinger, Inc."

This British Territorial franchise corporation was named after me and created while I was a baby in my cradle.  The citizenship contract allowing this was totally undisclosed to my Mother and unconscionable to me, and so, was invalid from the start. 

When this fictional British Territorial "Person" named after me was declared bankrupt and civilly dead,  I was already the  inheritor and beneficiary of the municipal Cestui Que Vie ESTATE trust identified as ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER that resulted from "her" death, as well as my purportedly "waived" estate as a Wisconsinite.  

I didn't voluntarily waive my birthright as a Wisconsinite and neither did my Mother on my behalf.  We did not create an infant decedent estate for the benefit of the Queen.  We did not knowingly or voluntarily participate in any of this and we claimed back my reversionary trust interest(s) via Unrebutted Affidavit that has been standing on the Public Record for over twenty years. 

Any Pretense or self-interested Presumption notwithstanding, I am the Naked Owner of my estate(s) and nobody and nothing comes between me and the Living God.  

And the same is true of 320 million other Americans.  

  

Our States of the Union have always been Third Parties with respect to the combatants in the so-called American Civil War, which was in fact an illegal and immoral Mercenary Conflict staged by States-of-States business organizations that were service providers and subcontractors of States.  

There isn't an excuse in this world or the next, for any Pretense that "I" fought on either side of this purported "war" or that any combatant therein has any material interest in my Estate/ESTATE, is owed any war reparations, or is my custodian. 

The persons making these absurd claims are my Employees and I have not given them any authorization to represent me in these matters.  

The Officers of the Joint Chiefs and the Officers of the International Courts and the Bank for International Settlements and all other responsible Parties in receipt of this communication are fully liable and informed and must take immediate action to correct this situation on my behalf and on behalf of 320 million other Americans who have been attacked and defrauded by these British Bunko Artists.

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

August 22nd 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.