International Public Announcement: The Answer is Simple

 By Anna Von Reitz

Humanity has been attacked and millions of innocent people worldwide have been killed by Legal Fictions -- corporations that not only have no natural right to exist, but which, it turns out, also have no lawful or legal right to exist.  

In order to charter corporations, a government must occupy the soil jurisdiction of an actual country; to register franchises, a government must occupy the land jurisdiction of an actual country.  

In the present case, corporations should have been chartered by the King or Queen of England, but no such King or Queen has sat on the Throne of England during the past 300 years. Once chartered, international franchises could be registered, but failing the first part -- a properly chartered parent corporation, the franchises all fail the test, too.  

It turns out that the Brits have been secretly creating corporations without the standing to do so and getting away with this lawless and irresponsible behavior for 300 years. 

No wonder that their corporations and the officers responsible for running them have likewise been piratical and unaccountable. 

So it appears that no lawful Sovereign has sat on the Throne of England since somewhere in the reign of Queen Anne (1701-1714).  That means that no valid corporation charters have been issued since then. It also means that no valid registrations of franchises have taken place. 

It inexorably follows that without the authority and standing to create corporations, all the corporations ostensibly chartered or registered throughout the British Empire for the past 300 years are defunct, null and void, as if they never were, and their assets are chattel owed to their Creditors.

This is not quite the overwhelming disaster one might assume.  

The affected organizations can voluntarily undergo lawful conversion, a process sometimes called "nationalization", and continue to operate under the Law of the Land of their native country, assuming that their country still has and retains its sovereignty. 

The abdication of a particular Sovereign or even a group of Sovereigns acting in breach of trust does not necessarily change the sovereignty of a country, so long as the property rights and interests of that country are maintained and not permanently vacated so as to invite claims of abandonment. 

England's throne can stand vacant for 300 years, but so long as the Hereditary Lord High Steward claims the land and soil for the Kingdom of England, it would be difficult for anyone to assert that the Kingdom has ceased to exist or been abandoned. 

Obviously, there is at least one man standing who hasn't abandoned it and is enforcing its treaties and grants and contracts. 

The same can be said for the situation in America, where the Hereditary Head of State rolled out of the mothballs and lodged his claims on behalf of the Several States and The United States of America, preventing any notion that our country has been abandoned and no longer has a government standing on its land and soil. 

It has been suggested that once the English Sovereign evaded the obligations of the Christian and Constitutional Monarchy, the duty of creating corporations "for England" fell upon the foreign government of Westminster, but a foreign government remains a foreign government. 

Westminster may have standing to create corporations for Westminster, but not for England. 

Proponents of this Legal Theory suggest that the "British Crown Corporation" properly chartered by the Government of Westminster would be enabled to enfranchise corporations for "Great Britain", which is itself a Legal Fiction and not a country.  

We are sorry, but inchoate Legal Fictions do not have the land jurisdiction to support franchises -- only countries acting in their own sovereign capacity do. 

As a result, Westminster can charter corporations for Westminster all day long, and can register franchises for those corporations, too, but never be able to incorporate franchises for England or Great Britain, either one. 

Therein lies another part of the overreaching fraud, in that the Public has believed in the existence of English Corporations and Scottish Corporations and so on, and also taken for granted the existence of British Corporations under the auspices of Great Britain the entire time that the English and Scottish Thrones have been vacated--- and instead, what we have is the foreign government of Westminster fronting the British Crown Corporation "as if" it was British, when it's not and never has been.  

Having not occupied the actual Thrones and having not confirmed their actual vows, the purported English  and Scottish Sovereigns have lost general jurisdiction throughout, yet have busied themselves in the international jurisdiction of the sea and the global jurisdiction of the air in a legless capacity. 

Their Territorial and Municipal governments have created corporations operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea and in the global jurisdiction of the air, respectively, with no accountability nor any standing to do this.

These renegade business organizations have then deceptively claimed registration with the British Crown. Obviously, the Crown and the Government of Westminster know that these Territorial and Municipal corporations have been formed without substantive authority and also know that foreign non-entities cannot be registered as franchises.  

These non-entities disguised as Territorial and Municipal corporations and documented as British Crown franchises have then continued their rampages of predatory lawlessness on one hand, while liberally claiming bankruptcy protection from their victims on the other. 

We are determined that this evasion and deceit must come to an end, both for the people of the countries directly impacted by this undermining of their government and their Social Contracts, and those who have suffered collateral damage along with The United States. 

Thus we are openly and in public declaring our foreclosure of the assets and franchises of the British Territorial and Municipal Government Corporations worldwide and we are exercising our position as the Preferential Creditors of these organizations in both international and global jurisdictions. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 29th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

No Debt Expansion Equals Collapse

 By Anna Von Reitz

Sounds counter-intuitive, doesn't it?  

The Bretton Woods conference and all the solutions coming out of it depended on an "ever expanding economy" and unfortunately, also depended on fiat currency and central banks and.... ever expanding debt.

If you think about it, it's obvious.  If the economy is good, people invest, which means they go into debt and the new debt creates what?  New debt notes. This inflates the currency and devalues it, but, if the economy continues to expand, it doesn't matter. 

What do you need for a "continuously expanding economy"?  

You need a continuously expanding population demanding goods and services, which is what you would expect overall absent a great plague or nuclear war, etc., especially in the post-war Baby Boom Era. 

Plus, you need a continuously spending and investing population creating more debt for itself. You have to have a good consumer base of people eager to go into debt to buy things like jet skis and yoghurt makers. 

Those two things-- expanding population and expanding debt--  are what are needed to fuel the kind of ever-expanding economy that Bretton Woods depended upon ---and in the post-war 1940's, those were both sure bets.  

Where are we now? 

The Baby Boomers have topped off; most of them have quit borrowing and are instead paying off loans, finishing mortgages, and going into reduced-spending retirement mode.

The potent economic driver provided by the Baby Boom is winding down. 

At the same time, thanks to nut cases in DC, Rome, London, and elsewhere, we are in a deepening population collapse -- which will not only kill our economy, but the entire world economy using the debt-note currency model. 

As we pay off debts with debt notes, which causes inflation, the vicious cycle deepens. 

Getting people to invest at all requires artificially plunking up places to spend investment money, such as doing what the Fed just did by self-investing billions back into the stock market. 

This self-induced bull market generates hyperinflation like its own little storm bottle, and prompts people to invest in stocks in hopes of quick painless profits, but anyone investing in this particular bull market needs to realize that at a certain moment agreed upon by insiders, it's going to crash like a deflated balloon and the same thing is going to happen to the currency supply-- it's going to dry up, and has been quietly drying up since 2017. 

This is when Grandma's Investment Strategy comes in handy.  You take what you can afford to lose and invest it in the phony baloney stock market. As soon as you start making money, you start reaping it back until you have recouped your original investment amount.  You keep doing this so that all you ever risk is that initial amount, and keep the profit safely invested in cash assets. 

Then, when the market goes Ka bluey, all you ever have at risk is that initial amount you could afford to lose, and that has been replaced five, ten or however many times over by the run up of the stock market. 

If you are disciplined and keep investing this way, you can make substantial gains on a phony bull market and never risk losing your shirt--- but most people get greedy and start investing back their profits instead of rat-holing those in cash investments. 

And that is where people become "over-exposed" and lose the whole shooting match, or worse, get tempted into leveraging and betting on the market and end up deep in debt for all their efforts. 

The big banks in charge of the printing presses are going to run up the stock market, hyperinflate the economy doing so, and then the whole thing is going to go bust --- if they have anything to say about it. 

The Federal Reserve Note will be greatly deflated, which is the opposite of inflated; you will be able to buy more with each FRN but any new money supply will be virtually non-existent, and as the population collapses, both demand for dollars and the size of the world economy will shrink. 

Central banks are all in the business of rigging commodities, but the most important commodity they manipulate is the money supply -- or, what passes for money -- the fiat currency. 

Debt notes which depend on ever-expanding debt and increasing population willing to invest, are not viable in the current economic environment. 

To put it in Goon-ease, "the currency model does not fit current economic and market conditions". 

Our population is getting drastically smaller, not larger. 

We are paying off debts and not ordering up new loans. 

The fiat currency is devaluing rapidly due to inflation caused by the guys with the printing presses self-investing billions in companies and commodities they already own and causing a phony bull market. 

Cash supplies are not being replenished and we are in the most draconian cut back on cash supplies in living memory, so, there is far less cash in the marketplace and it is still rapidly losing ground to inflation. 

This grotesque cut back in the cash supply will continue during and after the stock market collapse, resulting in a situation where every deflated Federal Reserve Note will be able to buy far more than at present.

Without an ever-expanding population and ever-expanding investment market causing ever-expanding debt, the economy based on the debt-note model collapses. 

The Federal Reserve is doing this -- again -- just as they did in the 1920's because in a sense, they don't know what else to do.  The politicians are demanding "good news" to prop up their candidates through the campaign season, so the Fed is providing at least the appearance of a booming stock and investment market. 

This is the last bonfire before the smoke and ashes. 

This is because there is no actual investment expansion, therefore no debt expansion, and no expanding population to drive any of the drivers that the fiat currency model depends upon. 

The Fed is busily extracting the last vapors out of the Federal Reserve Note. 

And the fiat currency model is all the Fed has to work with, because only the actual States of the Union can issue gold and silver asset-backed money. 

If only we had gold and silver asset-backed currency back again, we could trade it against the Federal Reserve Notes and inject value back into the fiat currency as well as pay off debt and kill inflation....

But wait, didn't I say that the actual States of the Union have been in Session for three years?  With all their people properly declared, recorded, and published?  Provenance and standing established? 

And the Federation of States is still here, still able to issue gold and silver currency? 

Oh, wait, didn't the States just take a roll call vote and issue a new gold-backed currency, the American Federation Dollar?  

So there is no need for any crash after all, no "inevitable" boom and bust, because we now have a different currency model in play, one that uses actual money and pays actual debts and has actual substance. 

Lions and tigers and bears! 

Oh, my! 

Instead of relying on the expansion of debt, we can rely on pre-paid credit, instead. And instead of being limited to commercial debt swapping, we can use real money at our discretion to actually pay debts. 

How? Why? 

Because we, the living people, and our lawful States of the Union,  are the actual owners of both the assets and the credit generated from the assets. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Public Service Announcement: Black Swan My Rump

 By Anna Von Reitz

We have been asked to comment on a report received today from Mike Adams, which observes the following:

"The mainstream media is now pushing a "Black Swan event" to take place in 2024, saying it will be a "national security event" with "high impact." They're already blaming China, Iran and North Korea, setting up the narrative in advance of the event.

The most likely form of such an event would be a cyber attack that takes down the US financial sector or power grid. The results would, of course, be devastating and could lead to widespread chaos and financial collapse."

No, No, No, children.  

The Vermin pushing this garbage are intent on pre-programming you to think that Russia and Iran and North Korea are responsible for atrocities that they intend to commit themselves to cover up their horrendous thefts and financial embezzlement and political malfeasance over the past 160 years. 

They needn't bother trying it, because we already have the records and those records are already distributed worldwide--- in hard copy, so.... no point in taking down the American financial grid or messing with the internet, etc. and causing a big brou-ha-ha. 

Your belief in their Big Lies would then leave you vulnerable to supporting their use of conventional forces --- your sons and daughters --- to attack these three remaining bastions of the human race that have not succumbed to the Raj. 

And so, they would manipulate you into fighting with and destroying people who you should be leaving alone, while you face the common and actual British Raj enemy that is occupying your own country and substituting itself as "your" government and stealing you blind and enslaving you in the process. 

Black swan? Hardly. More like a black crow that needs to be given a whack with a household broom and sent squawking down the road. 

You can't believe what the Media tells you, because the media is now owned and controlled by the Raj.  Their business is to sell you stuff, and if they have to lie to do so, well, guess what? 

Whether it is selling you on another World War, or selling you on the latest brand of chocolates or winter snow tires, it's all the same to them. They are gutless, soulless, self-interested, greedy, cowardly whores. So don't listen to a word they say about anything at all, or you will soon be "programmed" like Pavlov's dog and earnestly believe in pure drivel.

Do what we did in 1989 to our eternal satisfaction -- start thinking for yourselves, and turn the knob.

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                  In care of: Box 520994

                  Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 28th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: What About Germany?

 By Anna Von Reitz

We knew this question was coming, after so much attention being focused on the British Monarchy shell game and its faux pas and the results to date. 

Many people now living don't realize that the British Monarchy has been controlled by Germans since the death of Queen Anne in 1714. Queen Anne the last Stuart Queen, who also figures largely in the Throne of England being vacant and all the fraud that has taken place ever since. 

After Anne, the Hanoverian German Kings took over until 1837, and after that, Britain has been ruled by the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha German Kings who changed their name to "Windsor" in 1917 (under George V) in an effort to appear more British. 

This would be like me changing my name to MacTavish in an effort to appear more Scottish. 

Adopting the name "Windsor" amounts to a disguise or a nom de guerre; it's a deceit to fool the public into thinking that their "English" Kings and Queens are English, much as they have been fooled into thinking that the Throne of England was occupied all this while.  

The Windsors are not English. They are all Germans.

When Queen Victoria married Prince Albert it was a merger of Hanoverians and Thuringians -- Germans all.   

So both World War I and World War II were wars fought by Germans on both sides.  Is it any surprise that the great Chief of General Staff here in America was named Eisenhower? 

The whole situation, both times, can be viewed as a German pissing match, into which other innocent people were drawn, hoodwinked, and made to pay the price.

Because the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family was allied with Rome, because they were secretly operating unlawfully using the Monarchy shell game we have described, substituting the "Queen" of Great Britain for the Queen of England -- leaving the land and soil jurisdiction thrones vacated, while they served as "Kings' of corporate legal fictions, because they had the vast manpower and resources of America and the Commonwealth to draw upon, and most of all, because they were operating as Mercenaries, they could draw in vast amounts of investment money from war profiteers -- Germany itself, their ancestral homeland, was doomed. 

Those loyal to their German homeland or at least to their own word and duties as German Kings, most notably Kaiser Wilhelm II, himself a Saxe-Coburg-Gotha scion, were also doomed--- and snookered, but not completely. 

You will notice that Wilhelm II also pulled his own Monarchy shell game, and left the Throne of the Kingdom of Prussia vacant while he operated in the Roman Imperial Office as Emperor.  

It must be asked --- did Kaiser Wilhelm II purposefully betray the ancestral homeland into the grasp of George V -- so the family safely ensconced in Britain could laugh all the way to the bank?  

They and their French Rothschild Bank certainly did so after the Armistice, and also the Bank of England, which was left guarding billions of metric tons (with a "b") of Russian and Prussian gold on deposit.  

We assume that the "Peace Treaties" and in particular the Treaty of Versailles supposedly ending the First World War, was actually an extended Armistice similar to what they pulled at the end of the so-called American Civil War --- leaving themselves easy "legal" means to continue warring against the disarmed German and Slavic populations.

The WWI Peace Process could hardly be anything else but another Big Lie, because remember, they vacated the Throne of England circa 1709 and the Throne of the Kingdom of Prussia during Wilhelm II's tenure, so there were no competent land jurisdiction Sovereigns present to sign an actual land jurisdiction Peace Treaty in 1919. 

More Funky Monkey BS. 

So, what does this portend for Germany today?  It has spent most of the last century being an "occupied Territory" under the thumbs and boot heels of the British Raj and their clueless American mercenary forces, administered by foreign, for-profit corporations owned by the same crooks. 

The people of Germany have been the subject of endless ridicule, blame, and outrageous claims of genocide, mass murder, and organized Concentration Camps -- that were developed in Britain and deployed in Africa during the Boer Wars.  

Go figure. 

The Kingdom of Prussia is still holding the land and soil tenure of the German Empire parts and principalities, and it still has an actual King, but how savory are these characters?  

Were they in on the schemes that left over a hundred million people dead?  And part of the con game that substituted corporation CEOs for Christian Monarchs?  And undermined and defaulted on solemn Social Contracts behind a "cloak of secrecy"? Did they steal from the people they were supposed to protect?  Do they have any right to sit on the Throne of the Kingdom of Prussia?  Have they taken the correct solemn vows? 

What kind of people are they? 

We honestly don't know. 

The people of Germany certainly have cause to find out, if only to collect approximately 8 billion metric tons of gold left on deposit with the Bank of England. 

They also have cause to stand up, reclaim their birthright political status as people native to the German Principalities, and operate their traditional land and soil jurisdiction governments without a nod to the noxious mercenary forces and foreign commercial corporations that have been "occupying" their country illegally and for far too long. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                  The United States of America

                  In care of: Box 520994

                  Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 28th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

American Public Announcement: What Applies to You? ---And Doesn't?

 By Anna Von Reitz

As always, it is a matter of discerning which "law" applies to you -- or doesn't apply to you.  People have been contacting me, alarmed by new regulations being imposed by the "Corporate Transparency Act" (CTA) as of next Monday, January 1, 2023. 

This Act, like all legislative Acts, pertains only to federal business entities, corporate officials, and corporate employees. 

Are you a "federal" corporate business entity, corporate official, or corporate employee?  

Let's look at the actual list of who is liable for these new business reporting requirements: 

The CTA impacts federal reporting entities, corporations, limited liability companies, limited business partnerships, business trusts, and similar entities that are created or registered by filing documentation with a State of State Secretary of State or Indian Tribal Office.  (Indian Tribal Offices are also under the British-connected Federal Municipal System.) 

CTA does not include unincorporated, unregistered, unlicensed, and exempted businesses that have not sought public bankruptcy protection or similar limited liability benefits, and therefore are not public entities. 

It does include non-profits and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that have filed paperwork with any State of State Secretary of State or registered their organizations as franchise corporations with any State of State Division of Banking and Commerce, etc. 

Bottom line, if you have been unwise enough to incorporate your business enterprises and sought "benefits" for your business from the Public, and then used layers of interlocking trusts and other mechanisms to hide your business relationships, launder money, collude in illegal asset protection schemes, and dodge taxes --- you are in a heap of trouble, boy.  

As of January 1, 2024, you have to report on your business relationships, ownership interests, etc., to FinCen, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, of the U.S. Department of Treasury (note, this is not the same as the U.S. Department of the Treasury, LOL). 

As of this past week, you were in a heap of trouble, anyway, as your corporations are basically dissolved if they were in any way attached to the British Empire --and most of the corporations in America were, because since the Civil War when the Corporation Craze started in America, the State of State organizations have all been British Territorial Government operations. 

Read that -- unknown to you, your post-Civil War Corporations created in America have all been registered or otherwise documented and created by a British Territorial Secretary of State's Office, not an American Secretary of State's Office. 

This goes back to the great Substitution Fraud that occurred right after the Civil War, when the British Territorial Government (which was one of our three Federal Subcontractors) declared a "state of emergency" and shoe-horned -- under force and color of law -- the people of each State to create new "State of State Constitutions" providing a service contract for British Territorial State of State organizations to come in and substitute for the American State of State organizations that existed prior to the Civil War.   

Prior to the Civil War, our State services were provided by American purveyors operated as, for example, The State of Florida.  After the above described maneuver, the same services were provided by British Territorial purveyors operated as, for example, the State of Florida.  

The only difference that a person on the street could observe would be a change from "The" to "the", new signage, and some new personnel.  

All these organizations and all the organizations created by or registered by these and similar British-connected corporations (this probably means you, if you are an American corporation, limited liability company, yada-yada formed in this country after 1860) have been dissolved and their assets entered into receivership as of last week. 

So while reporting under the requirements of the CTA may have posed yet another reporting expense ---and if you were colluding, evading, or entangling in improper ways --- possible fines and other regulatory unpleasantness, there are bigger fish to fry. 

Don't worry about CTA or even the U.S. Department of Treasury. Worry about hauling your rumps and assets out of the flaming dogpile. 

The only way you can do this is by lawfully converting your corporate business operations -- that is, voluntarily "nationalizing" your corporations to stand under the Law of the Land and the auspices of your American Government still standing on the land and soil of your country. 

Otherwise, your companies are unincorporated chattel assets, unprotected and liable for all the "public debts" run up against private assets for the past three centuries. 

This is because, ever since Queen Anne, the Brits have been operating their Monarchy as a shell game.  The Throne of England has stood vacant for three centuries, and that is a real problem, because in order to charter or register corporations -- a government must hold its sovereignty on the Land and Soil. 

And yes, the Poo rolls downhill.  Because their Majesties haven't been operating in the proper Office and capacity and under the correct form of Law, they haven't had the power to create or register corporations this entire time.  

As a result, all the corporations formed under the auspices of Great Britain and the UK and most American Corporations, too, (because of the Substitution Scheme described above) stand dissolved and their assets are claimed by our unincorporated Federation of States, as the Preferential Creditor still standing. 

Under such a circumstance, former British Corporations, like their unwitting "American affiliates", may choose to lawfully convert their operations as American Corporations standing on the land jurisdiction of The United States of America.  

Intent to function lawfully from now on may be established by a vote of the Board of Directors, Board of Governors, or other duly seated corporation officers. So long as they honor this expressed intent they will be given a reasonable amount of time to restructure and lawfully convert their operations. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                 In care of Box 520994

                 Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 28th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

This Just About Says it All

 

International Public Notice: One Good Fact v A Lot of Bad Law

 By Anna Von Reitz

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals

We paraphrase the title of this Notice from a reader-researcher-correspondent who responded to our recent appeal for research assistance:

"The last actual monarch of England was Queen Anne, who reigned from 1702 until 1714. She was the last monarch of the House of Stuart and the last English monarch to date who was not also monarch of Scotland."

However, the continued practice of the Coronation seems to say otherwise; Kings and Queens of England have continued to be crowned "as" Kings and Queens of England --- haven't they?  

Queen Elizabeth II certainly seemed to be taking the Coronation Vows of the Queen of England during her televised 1953 Coronation, but as Regina v JAH (John Anthony Hill) proved, within three days she severed that Social Contract, breaking it and leaving the English Throne vacant throughout the rest of her long career.  

She didn't sit on the Throne of England for seventy years; she sat on The Chair of the Estates, instead. 

So, knowing this we've been poking at the belly of the Beast and have confirmed among other things that neither the present King Charles III nor King Charles of Scotland ever took the Coronation Vows to be Kings of the land and soil of their respective countries. 

That is, they never entered General Jurisdiction and somehow magically just popped up to reign on the sea and in the air with no legs on dry land at all.  

People have assumed that it is possible to be both King of England and Scotland, but "no man can serve two masters". 

Instead, what appears to have happened, is an aberration of Nature and a gross violation of the public's trust in both England and Scotland, as well as Ireland and Wales later on. 

The people living in these countries have gone on believing in the existence of a King of England sitting on the Throne of England, and as we have seen, there has been considerable investment --- Elizabeth II's entire "for show" Coronation, for example --- in continuing this charade for public consumption, but.... sometime during the reign of Queen Anne, she became a "Corporate Queen" operating in the jurisdiction of the sea and owing her service to a Legal Fiction, not a living Kingdom populated by men and women. 

This counts as one of the longest-running fraud schemes in history, and stands as a stunning example of corporate guile employed against the living people who have relied upon what they reasonably believed to be their Christian King or Queen, to protect them and uphold their law.  

King Charles III and King Charles of Scotland are both "legless" having either vacated or never occupied the actual thrones of England or Scotland, either one --- and it appears that this has been the practice of their Predecessors for the past 300 years.  

They kept up appearances without actually being Kings of England or Scotland --- which means they have all been nothing more or less than glorified CEOs, operating apart from the land and soil of their respective countries. 

It also means that everything they have "signed into law" for the past 300 years is either void for fraud (most likely) or legislation that applies only to public employees.  

It means that all the "wars" they have engaged in from the time of Queen Anne forward have been Mercenary Conflicts only euphemistically called "wars". 

And that means that all the "war reparations" they have collected since The War of the Spanish Succession have been collected under False Pretenses and conditions of illegal confiscation.  

This also explains their ability to amass vast fortunes for the conduct of these wars, as they have been able to engage the backing of private banks and industrialist cronies acting as war profiteers in wars for profit, instead of relying on the public purse --- at least, that has been the case during the "wars".  

In each case an umbrella corporation was formed to act as a sort of clearinghouse for war-related purchases and disbursements.  In the Second World War, this umbrella corporation in America was the U.S. Corp.  Immediately after the "war" ended, this umbrella was folded up and bankrupted as a result of its surplus investments, and the cost of this was transferred to the unwitting American Public. 

This is just one example of how letting the supposed monarchs operate in this manner has promoted corruption and harm to the public they are supposed to serve, encouraged wars-for-profit, cronyism, elitism, unjust enrichment, and has ultimately given rise to their effort to establish a form of Corporate Feudalism, in which their corporations would literally own living people like farmyard animals and dispose of them accordingly. 

It should now be apparent to everyone reading this why a King must be held accountable to the people of his country and must sit on the Throne of his country and be responsible under the Law of the Land and Soil, before he has the right to charter or register any form of business entity.  

This, then, also explains how and why all the Municipal and Territorial Corporations -- and their franchises -- created and administered by "King" Charles III and "King" Charles of Scotland and all of their Predecessors back to Queen Anne, have been foreclosed upon by their Preferential Creditor, The United States of America --- our unincorporated Federation of States. 

None of these corporations except those that can prove that they were formed properly and lawfully prior to Queen Anne or under the auspices of Queen Anne prior to her quiet abdication of the Throne of England, have any right to exist.  

The authority that a country has to charter and register corporations derives from the Land and Soil Jurisdiction, and without a Sovereign on the Land and Soil, no such authority exists.  

As a result, all these later corporations from HSBC in Hong Kong to JB's Fish 'N Chips, Inc., are undone; the venerable Bank of England, formed in 1694 to fund the Government, most likely still holds water-- but beginning sometime during Queen Anne's Administration, there is no valid authority in place to create corporations. 

Everything that has gone on since then has been unlawful by definition, and a merely legal existence is not sufficient. 

Put another way, "Great Britain" is a Legal Fiction, but the Kingdom of England is a Lawful Person; it follows that the "King of Great Britain" is a Legal Person, whereas the "King of England" is a Lawful Person.  

Legal Persons do not have the power to self-generate. 

Thus all these corporations that have been formed for the last 300 years in England and in the Union and the Commonwealth, and all their franchises formed in other countries, including most of the members of the World Economic Forum -- are void.

"Lost at sea." 

They now represent a vast pile of unincorporated chattel assets claimed by the Preferential Creditor, our unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America.

The only option to unravel this Mess is for all these corporations to undergo lawful conversion, that is, "nationalization" and come back under the Law of the Land in their respective countries. 

The only way for England to proceed is through the authority and claims of the Hereditary Lord High Steward, Ivan Talbot, and the only way for him to form a lawful government is to call a meeting of the Heirs of the Norman Settlement --- something that hasn't been done on a voluntary basis since they signed The Magna Carta. 

This may seem extreme, but when you are dealing with corporate mischief and malfeasance going back 300 years at the Highest Levels of Government in the western world, extreme measures are called for. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                 In care of: Box 520994

                 Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 28th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.