An International Appeal for Research Assistance

 By Anna Von Reitz

My appeal is addressed to the people of England, the Union, and the former Commonwealth, though I am inclined to accept help from any quarter and anyone interested in the topic. 

It has come to our weary and heartsore attention that the fabric of traditional government in the western world has been eaten away by commercial interests until we find that "the" President of the United States is not The President of The United States, that both King Charles III and King Charles of Scotland are not acting as Kings, and even the Office of the Pope has been converted, such that there is no obvious ministerial capacity vested in it. 

The urgent question needing our attention this morning is -- exactly how long ago did this canker of deceit and commercialism take root in England? 

We very much suspect that it began during the later reign of Queen Victoria and the Administration of Benjamin DIsraeli as Prime Minister, which resulted in the so-called "enfranchisement" of the British working class as a means to fund the Territorial Raj in India. 

This undisclosed use of the British working people and their small holdings as collateral and their impersonation as things -- franchises of the British Crown Corp -- certainly upended the traditional Social Contract and breached the Public Trust on a vast scale, and all without the British people themselves being aware of it. 

The insidious workings of commercial interests are certainly present at that juncture and have been present ever since, but the question arises -- is this the earliest example we have of this misrepresentation and thwarting of the traditional Government and evasion of its Social Contracts?  

Or did it actually begin much earlier, with the  reparations collected by Queen Anne following The War of the Spanish Succession, which was finally resolved in 1707?  

For many reasons it is advisable that we track the Beast back to its origins and understand those origins thoroughly, but as an American, I feel that both in terms of having access to the source documents and the time to peruse them, it would be best if someone else picks up the trail and does this  research. 

The telltale signs we are looking for are: (1) undisclosed changes in the Social Contract, such that the people are promised one kind of leadership and government, but get another kind of leadership and government, instead; and/or, (2) the exact mechanism by which this change -- this "Bait and Switch" -- was accomplished? 

We know that Queen Victoria absented the English Throne in order to become "Empress of India" so that mechanism is clear.  We know that the late Queen Elizabeth II reneged on her Coronation Vows within three days of taking them and spent the rest of her long career occupying The Chair of the Estates, not the Throne of England --- so that mechanism is clear. 

We also know that Elizabeth II's Son, Charles, has not even bothered to enter on the Throne of England and was directly crowned as "His Imperial Majesty" instead, so the Windsors are no longer even bothering to hide their dereliction and the nature of their administration as a commercial enterprise operating without the obligations of the Throne of England, and therefore without its authorities and Social Contracts as well. 

We therefore have proof of this same double-dealing wherein the people of England expect one kind of leadership and receive another, offer one kind of Social Contract and receive a commercial contract instead --- during Queen Victoria's reign and during Queen Elizabeth II's reign and during the present Administration as well.  

Our research asks not only: did this kind of "Bait and Switch" go on earlier, as a practice of the immediate forbearers of Queen Victoria?  

We also ask if it has been practiced on a continual basis ever since Queen Victoria, such that Elizabeth II and Charles III have simply followed a pattern of malfeasance set down by their predecessors? 

The essence of the Bait and Switch under consideration is to promise the people of England a Christian English King, and a Social Contract expressed as a Constitutional Monarchy --- but then delivering a pagan Roman-style "King" in name only, operating without respect for any Social Contract, not actually sitting on the English Throne nor accepting its obligations, and all of this being administered as a Territorial Raj even in the homeland of England. 

There are many great historians both professional and amateur in England, who, once they are properly alerted to the existence of these issues, should be able to track them down and discern exactly where and when the commercial beast came ashore and began undermining the traditional Kingdom of England and its Social Contracts with the people of England.  

Faced with the enormity of this fraud and its implications for everyone living in the English-speaking world, we ask for the English people themselves to rouse up and notice that the actual Throne of England has been --- to our certain knowledge -- vacant for at least seventy years and perhaps much longer. 

We ask them to seriously and earnestly consider the implications of this dire situation. 

The only thing stopping the Creditors of England, the Union, and the Commonwealth from falling upon the land and soil of these countries like so many vultures, are those claims entered in favor of the Kingdom of England's interests by the Hereditary Lord High Steward, Ivan Talbot.  

As the American Fiduciary, and the Preferential Creditor of England, the Union, and the former Commonwealth, I have been obliged to foreclose against the legless "Kings" and investigate these matters for my purposes. 

It is well-past time that the people of England research them for their purposes. 

It is one thing to trust and assume that there is a King of England sitting on the Throne of England, and another to continue to assume this when you have been told point-blank that this is not the case and has not been the case for at least seventy years. 

Anyone looking for proof need look no further than the already admitted High Court case of Regina v JAH (John Anthony Hill) and the recent Coronation of Charles III, wherein it is self-evident that he has taken no vows as a Christian Monarch and therefore does not sit on the land and soil of England. 

Anyone taking me up on the offer to research these matters is asked to kindly advise me regarding the results of your investigations.  

I am left with the British Territorial and Municipal Corporations in receivership until this mess is sorted out.  

By: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

       The United States of America

        In care of: Box 520994

        Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 27th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Let's See....About the RV

 By Anna Von Reitz

When I first heard about the Reno Operation and the line they were trolling,  I played so dumb I felt stupid. I really did. 

I batted my baby-blues and listened and listened and listened and I read more "It's next week, no, it's...." posts by "Judy Byington" --- or was that "Judy Buying-time"?  ----than I care to think about.  

Here's what it comes down to, folks: 

1. You take the risk and bear the cost of making these foreign currency investments with no guarantees. 

 

2. If and when a currency revaluation occurs and if the currencies you invested in post huge gains, then you are told that you have to go to some undisclosed location on an abandoned military base or similar federal installation.

3. Once there, you have to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement promising your left leg if you ever breathe a word to anyone.

4. And you have to disclose your intentions about what you are going to do with your profits.... present a project plan for philanthropic programs you wish to fund --- as if they were the investors instead of you.  

5. And if you don't have any philanthropic projects, you might get a whole 2% of your profit; if you do have a project they approve of, they might give you another 10% to fund that.

6. And if you are lucky, you get to go home in one piece, unlike at least six people I know of who went to these "appointments" and didn't return.

This is gangster stuff and these people are "scalpers".  

They don't scrape your skull with Bowie knives, but they take 88-98% of your money for their profit, and they bully you and protect themselves. 

They are criminals engaged in criminal activities in international jurisdiction. 

That's why they drag you out to God-knows-where federal installations -- so you are on federal turf and operating in international jurisdiction, where you become subject to foreign law and their "discretion". 

That's for their protection, not yours. 

Then they make you sign these Non-Disclosure Agreements so you can't tell anyone about any of this or bring any complaints against them for the fraud they are committing against you. 

That's also for their protection, not yours. 

Then they "generously" keep 98% of your profits....

And they trick you into concentrating on your dream projects that you could do so much good with if only you had the money. 

That's to distract you and keep you from noticing that, hot damn, they are keeping 88% of your investment profits.  

So if they approve of your project, you walk out feeling so grateful that you got a whole 12% of your profit. 

Are you all nuts? 

You take all the risks, submit yourself to their judgment, sign all these contracts giving up your rights and options, and give them 88-98% of the profits ---for what? 

Taking your Dinar to a bank and swapping it for Federal Reserve Notes? 

This may be big news, Americans, but in most of the world, this is a completely routine bank transaction. 

It's only in your endlessly victimized country that people don't have access to normal banks and normal bank services, like currency exchanges. 

There is really only one reason that you can't just go into a bank and plunk your Dinar on the counter and walk out with the published international exchange rate worth of Federal Reserve Notes or Euros or British Pounds or anything else. 

Can you guess what that reason is?  It's because you have virtually no civilian banks left in your country.  

I listened to this "narrative" long enough and ran the numbers. If these goons are allowed to pull it off, it really would be the biggest "wealth transfer" in history, straight from your hands into theirs.  

And who the hell are they?  

It's rumored that they are "our" military, but our military has been operated as a foreign British Territorial Mercenary Service since 1863.... 

So, you are going to give away 88% of your profits to foreign mercenaries and hope for the best? 

Ever think of interviewing them and asking what they are going to spend their lavish cut of your money on?  

The more I thought about it, the madder I got. 

So the Federation of States chartered new civilian banks to operate on the land jurisdiction of this country and has given you, Americans, the opportunity to live like normal people again. 

Yes, if you are an American, you can have an account in a civilian bank, and you can exchange your Dinar for whatever other currency you want and do it for 100% of the posted international exchange rate. 

You don't have to go to any isolated, scary Federal installation.  You don't have to keep anything secret, sign any NDAs, none of that. 

 

And you don't have to "voluntarily" give foreign Mercs 88-98% of your profit, either. 

Or wind up in a ditch if you decide not to. 

If there is an RV or if there isn't, show some good common sense and don't endanger yourself. 

You now have banks where you can exchange currencies for the full published international exchange rate, no scary "appointments", no questions asked, no NDAs required. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Rule of Law or the rule of law....

 By Anna Von Reitz

The children of Satan are Masters of Deceit, and so they endeavor to fool everyone, every day, every way. 

Thus we have "Presidents" who aren't our Presidents  and Popes who aren't ministers and Kings without countries.  

Once you see it, it can't be unseen again. 

The past few years you have heard all sorts of speeches and whispers about "the rule of law" -- by which the rats mean all the little rules of law that they promulgate to benefit themselves and their secret agenda, which is illegal confiscation of American assets, credit, and labor. 

The way they invoke "the rule of law" and the context in which it is often stated leaves you thinking that they are talking about the "Rule of Law" --- as in a civilian society guided by lawful Sovereigns who rule according to the Law.

One is petty, foreign, didactic, and though potent as a tool for unjust enrichment, fraud, and other mischief, is merely an administrative tool. We have the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as an example of that kind of "rule of law". 

The Rule of Law is a whole different kind of thing and at a whole different level --and it's what we automatically think of and assume when we hear the words "Rule of Law".  We all want to live in a lawful culture, where there is justice and peace.  

Sounds good, doesn't it?  

This is yet another example where the same words mean vastly different things.  And another example where their promotion of their "rule of law" is deceptive.  

People would vote for the "rule of law" by mistake, thinking that they were voting for the "Rule of Law" instead. 

 

And that is just part of the point and reason I am drawing this to your attention.  It's the same words, with vastly different meanings. 

Just as they have defined "American State National" to mean someone born in American Samoa, we have defined "American State National" as anyone born in and being native to one of the Several States of the Union. 

You see this whole practice of deceptive wordplay throughout their practices and organizations and institutions.  The truth is not in them, and often it is easy to see what they gain by lies and omissions and confusion spawned by this kind of duplicity. 

Innocent people would use their Federal Code citations and claim to be "American State Nationals" in their system instead of making the same claim in our system, and they would then be accused of perjury if they made the claim in court.  

The judges would ask, reasonably enough, "Were you born in American Samoa?" 

And you, confused would say, "Of course, not. I was born in New Jersey." 

And the judges would say, "Then why are you claiming under oath that you are an American State National defined under Title 18?  That very clearly pertains to people born in American Samoa. You have perjured yourself in this court!" 

If you protested that no, no, that wasn't your intention, etc., the same judges would charge you with contempt of court on top of it. 

It's a deliberate trap using deceptively similar words, even the same words, to mean radically different things. 

It is the same thing with "the rule of law".  They know that people would vote for the "Rule of Law" and mistake the topic under discussion.  A different kind of trap, but a trap nonetheless. 

In dealing with this sort of deception and those practicing and promoting this behavior, we must be severe and not excuse it. They think it is cute and smart and profitable; we know it is dishonest, deceptive, and potentially criminal. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Receivership Claim Announcement

 By Anna Von Reitz

To All to Whom These Presents Come: 

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents 

As detailed in our correspondence with H.E. Cardinal Dominique Mamberti of the Vatican Chancery Court and the respective Justices of the International Court of Justice and the various church, corporation, and administrative officials and officers, we have discovered that: 

1. The "President" of the United States is not occupying the intended and rightful Presidential Office, nor is he representing our "United States" but is instead operating as the CEO of a foreign incorporated Municipal Corporation located in the District of Columbia; 

2. The purported Kings of both England and Scotland have never actually taken the required Coronation vows to occupy the Sovereign Office on the land and soil of either country, and are instead attempting to operate in the air jurisdiction without standing in the case of Charles III and in the sea jurisdiction without standing in the case of King Charles of Scotland; 

3. The Office of the Pope has also been recently and radically changed and redefined in a way that appears to permanently vacate the ministerial office owed to the Roman Catholic Church as a whole, and which leaves Pope Francis operating in an uncontrolled and unstated secular capacity. 

Each of these manipulative deceitful and ultimately fraudulent misrepresentations of these High Offices of Public and Private Trust appear to be engaged to promote unjust enrichment, power-mongering, and evasion of contractual obligations. 

All three circumstances must be addressed and corrected by the respective communities and institutions.

Last week, we placed all British Territorial and Municipal Corporations in immediate foreclosure. Without a Sovereign holding the General Jurisdiction on the land and soil there is no standing in Law for the charters and registrations of these corporations, and no protective State Immunity. 

These corporations owe our American Government and the people of this country a great deal of money, assets, and interest due.  We have thus acted to protect our Fiduciary Interest as well as to protect everyone from lawless corporate interests. 

We allow that there are some British Corporations created in the earlier history of the British Union and Commonwealth that were properly chartered or registered; however, the lack of a qualified Sovereign standing on the land and soil of England for at least the last seventy and perhaps more years, (See Regina v. JAH) together with the failure of King Charles III to take the appropriate Coronation Vows, leaves no standing for any British Corporation and renders them all, effectively, stateless. 

Whereupon we have exercised our position as Preferential Creditors and secured the personnel and assets of all British Territorial and Municipal corporations in general receivership.  

We recognize the claims of the Hereditary Lord High Steward, Ivan Talbot, retaining the land and soil of England for the Kingdom of England, and will allow for the restoration of its lawful government, and the reinstatement of its corporate functions under the Christian and Constitutional Monarchy. 

Pending that outcome we claim full right of disposition and right to discipline all British Territorial and Municipal corporate citizenry on our shores and we require them to abide by the Law of the Land as established by our treaties and contracts on our soil, and to abide by all customary and historical agreements of our lawful governments on the sea and in the air, guaranteeing our peaceful co-existence. 

All other nations impacted by these claims are advised to proceed peaceably to restructure their present government into a lawful form of government and to reclaim their own land and soil jurisdiction without further delay. 

As a first step, individual nationals need to declare and record (not register) their lawful claims to their own Good Names, DNA, and other property interests, including their inherited birthright political status on the land and soil of their native country.

 

This can be done via publication in local newspapers, via our State Assemblies in The United States, or via the Global Family International Land Recording Service. 

Having re-established and declared their own national origin and identity, individuals are then empowered to restore their lawful governments on the land and soil jurisdiction.  

Research into each country's history and customs will be necessary. 

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                 In care of: Box 520994

                 Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 26th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice -- APB Fraud Alert

 By Anna Von Reitz

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents

It has come to our attention that a group of international criminals is staging a major confidence racket out of Reno, Nevada, and using old, mostly abandoned military bases to expedite their activities throughout the country. 

The use of military bases entices unwary Americans into foreign international jurisdiction where they unwittingly become subject to foreign law. 

These Americans have invested privately in foreign currencies including the Iraqi Dinar, Vietnamese Dong, and Zimbabwean Zim, in the expectation that these currencies will accrue very significant value on the world market following a general currency revaluation. 

While currency speculation is often frowned upon as an unsavory activity, it isn't illegal and neither is the ownership or trading of foreign currencies. 

A man in possession of genuine foreign currency is  owed the full face value of that currency on the international exchange market, according to the posted international exchange rate. 

It is commonplace throughout the world for people to go to their bank or a currency exchange facility and exchange foreign currencies for local currencies. 

People in America have long been prevented from doing this, simply as a result of the general absence of civilian banks. 

Knowing this, the Perpetrators have told gullible Americans that they have to go to secret locations on mostly vacant military bases, sign Non-Disclosure Agreements, and also sign contracts stipulating what they will use their funds for, in order to exchange their foreign currency holdings and receive any benefit at all. 

The victims are told that they will receive back 2% of their investment's value, or, if the Perps like the proposed projects the people want to fund, up to 10% of the face value of their foreign currency investments. 

Both the location of this activity and the Non-Disclosure Agreement are calculated to control the victims, guarantee their compliance, and prevent them from bringing criminal complaints against the fraud later on.  

That is, the criminals propose to keep 90% of the victim's investment value for themselves, by (1) preventing the victim's access to civilian banks where they could freely exchange their currency at 100% value, and (2) by subjecting the victims to foreign law; and (3) by constructively forcing the victims to sign crippling Non-Disclosure Agreements designed to protect the Perpetrators.

These are international crimes and all peacekeeping and law enforcement offices, civilian and military, are hereby made aware of this ongoing international fraud scheme and confidence racket aiming to defraud peaceful, law-abiding Americans out of 90% of their investment value by means of the above manipulations. 

Everyone who has invested in these foreign currency products now has the option to declare their lawful birthright political status and to have access to our own American-chartered civilian banks, where they can obtain routine exchange of any foreign currency at whatever the current exchange rate may be. 

As the American Fiduciary it is my duty and responsibility to provide the civilian population with customary bank services, track and if possible, prevent international bank and currency fraud, and to protect the American people and their assets.  

This confidence racket, if successful, would potentially defraud American investors out of trillions of dollars and transfer the bulk of the investment value -- 90 to 98% -- into the hands of unknown criminals, quite possibly British Territorial Mercenaries, to be used for unknown purposes.  

If allowed, and if the future exchange rates are anywhere near the rates some people calculate, this would create the largest money laundering fraud scheme in world history.  

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                  In care of: Box 520994

                  Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 26th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Reply to "Fearless Floyd" -- Alert to Law Enforcement

 By Anna Von Reitz

My first suggestion is to change his media name to "Clueless Floyd".  

For reasons unknown, except for a suspected attachment to the thoroughly discredited Reign of the Heavens Society, "Floyd" -- if that is his real name -- has been attacking me like any good troll-for-hire and "exposing" all sorts things I "exposed" about myself and my family and activities a long time ago. 

Go here: www.annavonreitz.com and read all about my purportedly dark past and my husband's purportedly dark past and all the gossipy nasty personal attacks that Floyd produces at someone's behest each week--- only do it with the complete story in your hand.  

Not a one-sided, half-baked, only partially disclosed Clueless Floyd version ginned up to get ratings for Floyd at the expense of leaving you all as clueless as birds on a branch.

If you want the truth you are going to have to read and make your own decisions. 

Begin with my book, Disclosure 101, which fully explains the early history of how I, a Great-Grandma from a tiny hamlet in Alaska, spent seven years of my life (and at my own expense) serving Notice on all the Pope's Municipal Corporation Employees. 

Then, read all about my work preventing the Reign of the Heavens Society from incorporating an offshore corporation calling itself "The United States of America, Incorporated" and using it to access the credit and assets owed to this country. 

Then also read my comments about the "Scalpers" set up in Reno, who are demanding that you come onto (mostly vacated) military bases and sign Non-Disclosure Agreements related to foreign currency exchanges.  

Ask yourselves why you would have to go on a military base and sign Non-Disclosure Agreements to exchange one currency for another?  

These men are crooks, obstructing trade and using both force and ignorance as tools to rook you out of the value of your speculative investments in foreign currencies. 

If you are good little girl, you might possibly get up to 10% of the value, subject to them and their judgement. 

But what if they have no right to mess with you at all?  

What if that piece of foreign currency belongs to you and whatever its face value may be--- that also belongs to you?   And come to it, you belong to you. 

Unless you are presently working for the military under an employment contract, you are a civilian and can exchange your currency directly at one of our civilian banks and not have to go through any of this turkey-trot designed to unjustly enrich these buggers with 90% or more of your investment value. 

No Non-Disclosure Agreements.  No dangerous international places to go with armed guards and check points.  No lengthy contracts.  Nobody sitting in judgement of you and your philanthropic projects. 

You get none of that with me --- and all of that with Floyd and his host of flying monkeys. Yet, Floyd says I am out to "steal" the value of your foreign currency investments. 

Pray tell, how? 

The exchange rates for foreign currencies are published worldwide every day on the internet, and posted for anyone including Homer's Pet Pig to read for themselves?  

So how am I or any honest banker going to cheat you out of anything you are owed?  The exchange rate on any given day is what it is.  

And in any normal country, you can walk into any bank and plunk down any currency you like and exchange it for Federal Reserve Notes, or Euros, or whatever else.  

The problem in this country is that the same Pikers proposing to make you sign Non-Disclosure Agreements have shut down the civilian banks so that you don't have access to normal banks. 

They did this against the law, to pad their own pockets. They are the crooks, pure and simple. 

They and people like "Floyd" are the ones proposing to charge you a fat 90% of your investment value and also proposing to limit what you can do with your paltry remaining 10%. 

Not me. 

I've opened up civilian banks for the first time in over a hundred years and said, have at it, people.  Take charge of your own country and your own lives. Come exchange your money for exactly what it is worth on the world market.  

No "secrecy".  No NDAs. No foreign territory. 

They offer to put you through all this cloak and dagger rigmarole for a reason -- and that reason is to protect themselves from being arrested. 

They do it on old military bases so that they have control of you in a foreign international jurisdiction. 

They make you sign Non-Disclosure Agreements so you can't complain afterward or tell law enforcement authorities.  

They charge you 90% for the "service" of exchanging your Dinar, Zim of whatever --- something you can do for yourselves, thank you, and you could retain 100% of your investment with no strings attached, if you knew how to find a civilian bank. 

Well, guess, what --- I have opened a civilian bank and made completely normal ho-hum bank services available to you, and they are mad because well, that gives you 100% of your investment and leaves those gluttonous rats with zip. 

They can spew lies about me and my husband and everyone associated with me until the cows come home and it will never change the fact that they are the ones aiming to cheat you. 

And as of this moment, I am dropping the dime on them.  

Hello? Military law enforcement?  We have people set up in a headquarters in Reno, Nevada,  pretending to be associated with the American military.  

This appears to be an organized confidence racket designed to take place on old military bases all over this country, fully intending to defraud the people of this country out of private investments they made in foreign currency.  

Exchanging foreign currency is a routine legal activity and we have civilian banks ready and able to exchange foreign currencies according to world market exchange rates. 

Our people are being coerced and lied to and told to go to "secret" locations and sign Non-Disclosure contracts in order to receive back a whole 10% of their investment value. 

In essence, they are being told that their speculative investments in foreign currency are worth so much that they can't have the full face world market exchange value paid to them without restrictions --- which is nonsense. 

This is self-evidently an organized confidence racket  pretending to be sponsored by "our" military.

Better clean your skirts, boys, and shut 'em down.  You, too, Floyd. You are dirtying up the airwaves for no good purpose. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Onward, Christian Soldiers! by Fr. Francis Fenton

Father Francis E Fenton was a Catholic Priest, and a pioneer of the Traditional Catholic Movement.

He was co-founder of the ORCM (Orthodox Roman Catholic Movement) an organization of 11 priests at it's peak in 1979, who worked out of 27 chapels around the USA.

This was his address at the Vexilla Regis conference in the late 70s or early 80s. This could have been written yesterday and given for our times. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX-p3lUlgNY