The Feudal Monarchy System v. Our Family of Man

 By Anna Von Reitz

The battle actually began when the Israelites demanded that the prophet Samuel appoint a king over them --- a king other than the Lord God.  They had learned about this practice from their Canaanite neighbors who had kings--- and there were some obvious advantages to this system of monarchy.  

There was always a judge on site, ready to render judgements about whatever question was facing the people.  No waiting around for multiple days or months for God to reply through his prophets. 

There was the opportunity to develop a stratified crony-based culture.  Prior to this, one's position was based on seniority.  Elders ruled.  The only ones higher than the elders were the prophets, and of course, the Lord God. 

Suddenly, with a king, all his cronies got social standing because of their proximity to him.  Now you had princes and governors and Grand Poobahs --- and inevitably, a secular government.  

The relationship of religion to monarchy has always been the same.  Religious leaders (Samuel) choose the kings (Saul),  To a greater or lesser extent all monarchies depend on authority garnered from theocracies that preceded them.  

Even today, the British Monarchs are sealed into their office by the Archbishop of Canterbury. 

But what interest should God have in those who usurp his rightful position? 

There have always been those who disagreed with the entire concept of kings-- whether approved by religious leaders or by birthright.  

We have always served the True God, the Unseen, and have stood at odds philosophically with all kings --- even when we have been drafted to serve as kings ourselves.  

In our view, the Creator is the only King.

In our view, it is oddly, singularly, inappropriate that men should choose other men to rule over them.  

God created us all equal, brothers and sisters, all loved, all filled with our unique potential.  Who are we to distort nature into an arbitrary pattern of monarchy, pledges, allegiances, and a caste system of social obligations?   

This argument has raged for centuries.  

I think you can now see why when the opportunity arose to try The Great American Experiment, and found a nation built on the principles of self-governance, we gave our fortunes earned in the Old World to fund a New World --- a world in which individual life was supremely valued, where religious freedom was a birthright, and where no man could stand over another and demand fealty. 

America's real enemies have always been the monarchies and the Popes.  Whether theocracies or monarchies taking their authority from theocracies, both these forms of government are eternally opposed to freeing mankind and teaching men to be responsible for themselves. Both thrive from making men dependent on them, instead. 

So now, you see the two Nanny States on offer:  

Candidate Number One: the war-profiteering British Monarchy, steeped in blood and destruction and oppression of "inferior races", which will tell you what to do and think every moment of your lives, cradle to grave, and tax you severely for the privilege of being a pawn in their games. 

Candidate Number Two: the equally war-profiteering Papal Theocracy, steeped in blood and destruction and oppression of "infidel races", which will tell you what to do and think and shame and threaten you for every heretical thought from cradle to grave, tax you severely for your sinful nature, and withhold "eternal salvation" at a whim.  

Or, you can support what we bravely began here --- a simple secular government in which free men and women accept the responsibility of governing themselves by committee and who hold the natural rights of every individual as something sacred to be protected and preserved and asserted in the face of all would-be kings and potentates. 

The members of the Saint Germain Family and the donors of the Saint Germain Trust came largely from France, Hungary, Prussia, and Southeastern Germany.  They preserved in their hearts and minds a dream in which the Creator was recognized as the only True King, a vision of a world in which men valued each other, not according to race or creed or wealth or social position, but according to the gifts and contributions each one of us brings forward in life.  

That's the dream that founded America and the source of The Saint Germain Family Trust which has underwritten this enterprise since the very beginning.  

Today, British attorneys have attempted to unlawfully convert the Saint Germain Trust into a statutory trust and inept and greedy and ignorant men sitting in as officers of the trust have proposed to go along with this subversion, thinking that nobody was left who would recognize it for what it is --- a British con game seeking a means to overcome the trust indenture and plunder the assets.  

Thus, we have stepped forward as the Donors of the Trust and objected and put an end to this subterfuge, insisted on the law of the indenture, and approved the prosecution of anyone who continues to interfere with the rightful administration of The Saint Germain Family Trust as an American Common Law Trust in perpetuity.  

These funds are meant to underwrite America and the government we founded and the principles we founded it upon.  The assets, the gold and silver and other assets in our family trust didn't come from any unnatural source.  They came largely from wealthy families allied to Saint Germain, who were sick of the enslavement of mankind to the feudal systems of theocracies and monarchies.  

Now, we resist even more vehemently, the specter of Corporate Feudalism, in which faceless, nameless, unaccountable corporations and bureaucrats rule over men of flesh and blood.  

Make no mistake, the same Parties who created the Nanny States of the past are also the chief architects of the present horror.  

Men like Klaus Schwab propose the Ultimate Nanny State, with all that that implies: rigid, self-interested, political and economic "administration" of everyone else's life, dictating what is politically and socially correct at every moment, choosing our occupations "for" us, determining our life spans "for" us, and ruling with an ever-more mechanized grip devoid of connection to nature and as our Forefathers put it -- Nature's God. 

Pope Francis refuses to sit on the Papal Throne, and instead chooses to rule as the dethroned Roman Pontiff, just as Queen Elizabeth II abdicated the Christian Monarchy of St. Edward within three days of her Coronation and has occupied The Chair of the Estates and adopted the Imperial Crown instead.  

These are the actions of men and women in the thrall of Mammon, motivated by nothing more than convenience and avoidance of accountability to the people who trusted them --- wrongly --- to protect and preserve their lives, their rights and their property interests.  

Come, all you who are yearning for a better life and a better government.  Return to Nature and to Nature's God, and take up the burden of self-governance in exchange for your true and eternal freedom.  Do not entrust your lives to bureaucrats.  Get busy.  Participate.  Learn.  Join us, the Donors of your actual National Trust,  the Indemnifiers of your business operations, the Guarantors of your freedom ---- and devote yourselves to the hard work and sacrifice --- but also the joy and security ----  of being the authors of your own fate.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Now, the mules in Arizona have been outed - and arrests are finally happening!

 

Friend,   For a year and a half, I've been waiting to see perp walks for the steal of the 2020 election.  Finally, we got some! We can't let up now- now we have to press for justice for the stolen election! I'm Arizona Senator Wendy Rogers, and I have fought relentlessly for election integrity and auditing every election. We found the fraud; now time to punish the guilty! The film "2000 Mules" showed how a conspiracy to throw the election was executed.  Now, the mules in Arizona have been outed - and arrests are finally happening!

Gateway Pundit has the story of the arrests and investigation by Yuma law enforcement! Law enforcement has conducted a raid on Yuma County nonprofit organizations connected to the ballot trafficking scheme discovered by Yuma County citizens and revealed in the “2000 Mules” documentary. True The Vote and Dinesh D’Souza’s groundbreaking new film revealed that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen through illegal ballot trafficking and featured the undercover investigative work of David Lara and Arizona State Senate candidate Gary Snyder. David Lara tells us, “San Luis is Ground Zero for election fraud in Arizona.” As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, The Yuma County Sheriff and Yuma County Recorder opened a new investigation into cases of impersonation fraud, false registrations, duplicate voting, and fraudulent use of absentee ballots. Additionally, this investigation was announced just over one week after the nationwide premiere of the “2000 Mules.” The Gateway Pundit previously reported that David Lara and Gary Snyder busted a local ballot trafficking operation in Yuma County using undercover cameras long before the 2020 Presidential Election. This information was delivered to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who failed to act before it was too late. This is why our work is not done. Still getting pushback by the powers that be.  The fact that there has not been one comment from the RNC on the "2000 Mules" movie is striking. But the people are watching- we know.  We see the conspiracy every day.  A media that doesn't believe in the First Amendment, and is actively and viciously partisan. One party that feels so entitled to power that it is willing to throw elections to achieve it.  Now they are scared- we finally caught them and arrests were made.  But that was just one county. We need more - and I'll never stop working to bring to justice those who saddled us with Biden. The Deep State wants me gone. Will you help me beat them? Help me work to finish the job for election integrity in the Arizona Senate! Thank you so much, Wendy Rogers, Lt Col USAF (ret) Arizona State Senator Arizona's 6th Legislative District P.S. George Soros and the leftwing billionaires are going to target my district again with millions of dollars in attack ads like they did last time. Will you help me fend off the attacks by contributing before the end of this month?

Feast of Corpus Christi (Body of Christ)

 Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's

The Church's Year

Why is this day called Corpus Christi?

Because on this Thursday the Catholic Church celebrates the institution of the most Blessed Sacrament of the Altar. The Latin term Corpus Christi signifies in English, Body of Christ.

Who instituted this festival?

Pope Urban IV, who, in the decree concerning it, gives the following explanation of the institution and grandeur of this festival: "Although we daily, in the holy Sacrifice of the Mass; renew the memory of this holy Sacrament, we believe that we must, besides, solemnly commemorate it every year, to put the unbelievers to shame; and because vie have been informed that God has revealed to some pious persons that this festival should be celebrated in the whole Church, we direct that on the first Thursday after the octave of Pentecost the faithful shall assemble in church, join with the priests in singing the word of God," &c. Hence this festival was instituted on account of the greatness of the divine mystery; the unbelief of those who denied the truth of this mystery; and the revelation made to some pious persons. This revelation was made to a nun at Liege, named Juliana, and to her devout friends Eve and Isabella. Juliana, when praying, had frequently a vision in which she saw the bright moon, with one part of it somewhat dark; at her request she received instructions from God that one of the grandest festivals was yet to be instituted the festival of the most Blessed Sacrament of the Altar. In 1246, she related this vision to Robert, Bishop of Liege, who after having investigated the matter with the aid . of several men of learning and devotion, among whom was Jacob Pantaleon, Archdeacon of Liege, afterwards Pope Urban IV. made arrangements to introduce this festival m his diocese, but death prevented his intention being put into effect. After the bishop's death the Cardinal Legate Hugh undertook to carry out his directions, and celebrated the festival for the first time in the year 1247, in the Church of St. Martin at Liege. Several bishops followed this example, and the festival was observed in many dioceses, before Pope Urban IV. in 1264 finally ordered its celebration by the whole Church. This order was confirmed by ClementV, at the Council of Vienna in 1311, and the Thursday after the octave of Pentecost appointed for its celebration. In 13 17, Pope John XXII. instituted the solemn procession.

Why are there such grand processions on this day?

For a public profession of our holy faith that Christ is really, truly and substantially present in this Blessed Sacrament; for a public reparation of all the injuries, irreverence, and offences, which have been and are committed by impious men against Christ in this Blessed Sacrament; for the solemn veneration and adoration due to the Son of God in this Sacrament; in thanksgiving for its institution; and for all the graces and advantages received therefrom; and finally, to draw down the divine blessing upon the people and the country.

Had this procession a prototype in the Old Law?

The procession in which was carried the Ark of the Covenant containing the manna, was a figure of this procession.

The Church sings at the Introit the words of David:

INTROIT He fed them with the fat of wheat, alleluia: and filled them with honey out of the rock. Allel. allel. allel. Rejoice to God our helper; sing aloud to the God of Jacob. (Ps. LXXX.) Glory be to the Father and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.

COLLECT O God, who under a wonderful sacrament hast left us a memorial of Thy Passion; grant us, we beseech Thee, so to venerate the sacred mysteries of Thy body and blood, that we may ever feel within us the fruit of thy redemtion. Who liveth and reigneth with Thee, in the Unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end, Amen.

EPISTLE (I Cor. XI. 23-29.) Brethren, I have received of the Lord, that which also I delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus, the same night in which he was betrayed, took bread, and giving thanks, broke, and said: Take ye, and eat; this is my body which shall be delivered for you: this do for the commemoration of me. In like manner also the chalice, after he had supped, saying: This Chalice is the New Testament in my blood: this do' ye; as often as you shall drink., for the commemoration of me. For as often as you shall eat this bread, and drink this chalice, you shall show the death of the Lord until he come. Therefore, whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink of the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord. But let a man prove himself: and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of the chalice. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself, not discerning the body of the Lord.

GOSPEL (John VI. 56?59.) At that time, Jesus laid to the multitude of the Jews: My flesh is meat indeed arid my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, abideth in me, and I in him. As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, the same also shall live by me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Not as your fathers did eat manna and are dead. He that eateth this bread shall live forever.

 

[The explanation of the epistle and gospel is contained in the following instruction.]

The Jews, liberated by the powerful hand of God from Egyptian captivity, went on dry ground through the midst of the Red Sea, whose waters became the grave of their pursuer, King Pharao, and, his whole army. Having arrived in the desert called Sin they began to murmur against Moses and Aaron, their leaders; on account of the want of bread, and demanded to be led back to Egypt where there was plenty. The Lord God took pity on His people. In the evening He sent into their, camp great flocks of quails, which the Jews caught and ate, and on the morning of the next day the ground was covered with white dew, and in the desert something fine, as if pounded in a mortar, looking like frost on the earth, which as soon as the Jews beheld, they exclaimed in surprise: "Man hu?" "What is that?" But Moses said to them: "This is bread which the Lord has given you." And they at once began to collect the food which was white, small as Coriander seed, and tasted like wheat bread and honey, and was henceforth called man or manna. God gave them this manna every morning, for forty years, Sabbaths excepted, and the Jews lived upon it in the desert, until they came to the Promised Land. This manna is a figure of the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar which contains all sweetness, and nourishes the soul of him who receives it with proper preparation, so that whoever eats it worthily, dies not, though his body sleeps in the grave, for Christ will raise him to eternal life.

INSTRUCTION ON THE MOST HOLY SACRAMENT OF THE ALTAR

What is the Sacrament of the Altar?

It is that Sacrament in which under the appearance of bread and wine the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ are really, truly and substantially present.

When and to what manner did Christ promise this Sacrament?

About one year before its institution He promised it in the synagogue at Capharnaum, according to St. John the Evangelist: (VI, 24-65.) When Jesus, near the Tiberian Sea, had fed five thousand men in a miraculous manner with a few small loaves, these men would not leave Him, because they marvelled at the miracle, were anxious for this bread, and desired to make Him their king. But Jesus fled to a high mountain, and in the night went with His disciples to Capharnaum which was a town on the opposite side of the sea; but a multitude of Jews followed Him, and He made use of the occasion to speak of the mysterious, bread which He would one day give them and all men. He first exhorted them not to go so eagerly after the perishable. bread of the body, but to seek the bread of the soul which lasts forever, and which the Heavenly Father would give them, through Him, in abundance. This imperishable bread is the divine word, His holy doctrine, especially the doctrine that He had come from heaven to guide us to eternal life. (Vers. 25-38.) The Jews murmured because He said that He had come from heaven, but the Saviour quieted them by showing that no one could believe without a special grace from His Heavenly Father (V. 43, 44.) that He was the Messiah, and had come from heaven. After this introduction setting forth that the duty of faith in Him and in His divine doctrine was a spiritual nourishment, Christ very clearly unfolded the mystery of another bread for the soul which was to be given only at some future time, and this the Saviour did not ascribe to the Heavenly Father, as He did the bread of the divine word, but to Himself by plainly telling what this bread was: I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If any man eat of this bread, he shall live forever, and the bread that I will give, is my flesh for the life of the world. (V. 51, 52.)

But the Jews would not believe these words, so clearly expressed, for they thought their fulfillment impossible, and said: How can this man give us his flesh to eat? (V. 53.) But Jesus recalled not His words, answered not the Jews' objections, but confirmed that which He had said, declaring with marked emphasis: Amen, amen, I say unto you, except you eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you., (V. 54.) He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, hath everlasting life, and I will raise him up in the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed; he that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, abideth in me, and I in him. As the living Father bath sent me; and I live ,by the Father; so he that eateth me, the same also shall live by me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead. He that eateth this bread; shall live forever: (V. 55-59.) Jesus, therefore, said distinctly and plainly, that at a future time He would give His own Body and Blood as the true nourishment of the soul; besides, the Jews and the disciples alike received these words in their true, literal sense, and knew that Jesus did not here mention His Body and Blood in
figurative sense, but meant to give them His own real Flesh and Blood for food; and it was because they believed it impossible for Jesus to do this, and because they supposed He would give them His dead flesh in a coarse, sensual manner, that the Jews murmured, and even several of His disciples said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it? But Jesus persisted in His words: My flesh is meat indeed, &c., and calls the attention of His disciples to another miracle: to His future ascension, which would be still more incredible, but would come to pass; and by the words: It is the spirit which quickeneth, the flesh profiteth nothing, the words that I have spoken to you, are spirit and life, (V. 64) He showed them that this mystery could be believed only by the light and grace of the Holy Spirit, and the partaking of His Bodes and Blood would not be in a coarse, sensual manner, but in a mysterious way. Notwithstanding this, many of His disciples still found the saying hard, and left Him, and went no longer with Him. (V. 67.) They found the saying hard, because, as our Saviour expressly said, they were lacking in faith. He let them go, and said to His apostles: Will you also go away? thereby showing that those who left Him, understood Him clearly enough, and that His words did contain something hard for the mind to believe. The apostles did not leave Him, they were too well assured of His divinity, and that to Him all was possible, as St. Peter clearly expresses: Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of eternal life. And we have believed and have known that thou art Christ, the Son of God.

From the account given by St. John, it is plainly seen that Christ really promised to give us for our food His most precious Body and Blood, really and substantially, in a Wonderful, mysterious manner, and that He did not speak figuratively of faith in Him, as those assert who contemn this most holy Sacrament. If Jesus had so meant it, He would have explained it thus to the Jews and to His disciples who took His words literally, and therefore could not comprehend, how Jesus could give His Flesh and Blood to them for their food. But Jesus persisted in His words, that His Flesh was truly food, and His Blood really drink. He even made it the strictest duty for man to eat His Flesh and drink His Blood; (V. 54) He shows the benefits arising from this nourishment of the soul, (V. 55) and the reason why this food is so necessary and useful. (V. 56.) When His disciples left Him, because it was a hard saying, He allowed them to go, for they would not believe His words, and could not believe them on account of their carnal manner of thinking. This holy mystery must be believed, and cannot be comprehended. Jesus has then promised, as the Catholic Church has always maintained and taught, that His Body and Blood. would be present under the appearance of bread and wine in the Blessed Sacrament, a true nourishment for the soul, and that which He promised, He has really given.

When and in what manner did Christ institute the most holy Sacrament of the Altar?

At the Last Supper, on the day before His passion, after He had eaten with His apostles the paschal lamb, which was a prototype of this mystery. Three Evangelists, Matthew, (XXVI: 26?29.) Mark, (XIV. 22-25.) and Luke (XXII. 19-20.) relate in few, but plain words, that on this evening Jesus took into His hand bread and the chalice, blessed and gave both to His disciples, saying: This is my body, that will be given for you; this is my blood, which will be shed for you and for many. Here took place in a miraculous manner, by the all powerful word of Christ, the mysterious transformation; here Jesus gave Himself to His apostles for food, and instituted that most holy meal of love which the Church says contains all sweetness. That which three Evangelists. plainly relate, St. Paul confirms in his first epistle to the Corinthians, (XI. 23-29. ,See this day's epistle) in which to his account of the institution of the Blessed Sacrament he adds: Whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, (that is, in a state of sin) shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord . . . .eateth and drinketh judgment to himself. (V. 27-29.)

From these words and those of the three holy Evangelists already mentioned, it is clear that Jesus really fulfilled His promise, really instituted the most holy Sacrament, and gave His most sacred Body and Blood to the apostles for their food. None of the Evangelists, nor St. Paul, informs us that Christ said: this will become my body, or, this signifies my body. All agree that our Saviour said this is my body, this is my blood, and they therefore decidedly mean us to understand that Christ's body and blood are really, truly, and substantially present under the appearance of bread and wine, as soon as the mysterious change has taken place. And this is confirmed by the words: that is given for you; which shall be shed for you and for many; because Christ gave neither bread nor wine, nor a figure of His Body and Blood, for our redemption, but His real Body, and His real Blood, and St. Paul could not assert that we could eat the Body and Blood of the Lord unworthily, if under the appearance of bread and wine were present not the real Body and Blood of Christ, but only a figure of them, or if they were only bread and wine. This is also proved by the universal faith of the Catholic Church, which in accordance with Scripture and the oldest, uninterrupted Apostolic traditions¹ has always believed and taught, that under the appearance of bread and wine the real Body and Blood of Christ are present, as the Ecumenical Council of Trent expressly declares: (Sess. XIII. C. I. Can. I. de sacros. Euchdr.) "All our ancestors who were of the Church of Christ, and have spoken of this most Blessed Sacrament, have in the plainest manner professed that our Redeemer instituted this wonderful Sacrament at the Last Supper, when, having blessed the bread and wine, He assured the apostles in the plainest and most exact words, that He was giving them His Body and Blood itself; and if any one denies that the holy Eucharist truly, really, and substantially contains the Body and Blood, the Soul and Divinity of, our Lord Jesus Christ, therefore the whole Christ, and asserts that it is only a sign or figure without virtue, let him be anathema."

Did Christ institute this Sacrament for all time?

Yes; for when He had promised that the bread which He would give, was His flesh for the life of the world, (john. vi. ga.) and had said expressly that whosoever did not eat His Flesh and drink His Blood would not have life in Him, He, at the Last Supper, by the words: Do this for a commemoration of me, (Luke XXII. 19.) gave to the apostles and their successors, the priests, the power in His name to change bread and wine into His Body and Blood, also to receive It and administer It as a food of the soul, which power the apostles and their successors, the priests, have always exercised, (I Coy. X. 16.) and will exercise to the end of the world.

How long after the change does Christ remain present under the appearance of bread and wine?

As long as the appearances remain; this was always the faith of the Church; therefore in the primitive ages when the persecutions were raging, after the sacrifice the sacred body of our Lord was taken home by the Christians to save the mystery from the pagans; at home they preserved It, and received It from their own hands, as affirmed by the holy Fathers of the Church Justin, Cyprian, Basil, and others. But when persecution had ceased, and the Church was permitted to profess the faith openly, and without hinderance, the Blessed Sacrament was preserved in the churches, enclosed in precious vessels, (ciborium, monstrance, or ostensorium) made for the purpose. In later times it was also exposed, on solemn occasions, for public adoration.

Do we Catholics adore bread when we pay adoration to the Blessed Sacrament?

No; we do not adore bread, for no bread is there, but the most sacred Body and Blood of Christ, and wherever Christ is adoration is due Him by man and angels. St. Augustine says: "No one partakes of this Body until he has first adored, and we not only do not sin when we adore It, but would sin if we did not adore It." The Council of Trent excommunicates those who assert that it is not allowable to adore Christ, the only begotten Son of God, in the Blessed Sacrament. How unjust are those unbelievers who sneer at this adoration, when it has never entered into the mind of any Catholic to adore the external appearances of this Sacrament, but the Saviour hidden under the appearances; and how grievously do those indifferent Catholics sin who show Christ so little veneration in this Sacrament, and seldom adore Him if at all!

Which are the external signs of this Sacrament?

The form and appearance, or that which appears to our senses, as the figure, the color, and the taste, but the substance of the bread and wine is by consecration changed into the real Body and Blood of Christ, and only the appearance of bread and wine remains, and is observable to the senses.

Where and by whom is this consecration effected?

This consecration is effected on the altar during the holy Sacrifice of the Mass (therefore the name Sacrament of the Altar), when the priest in the name and by the power of Christ pronounces over the bread and wine the words which Christ Himself pronounced when He instituted this holy Sacrament. St. Ambrose writes: "At the moment that the Sacrament is to be accomplished, the priest no longer uses his own words, but Christ's words therefore. Christ's words complete the Sacrament."

Is Christ present under each form?

Christ is really and truly present under both forms, in Divinity and Humanity, Body and Soul, Flesh and Blood. That Jesus is thus present is clear from the words of St. Paul: Knowing that Christ rising again from the dead, dieth now no more. (Rom. VI. 9.) Because Christ dies no more, it naturally follows that He is wholly and entirely present under each' form. Hence the council of Trent says: "Whoever denies that in the venerable Sacrament, of the Eucharist the whole Christ is present in each of the forms and in each part of each form, where a separation has taken place, let him be anathema."

Then no matter how many receive this Sacrament, does each receive Christ?

Yes, for each of the apostles received Christ entirely, and if God by His omnipotence can cause each individual to rejoice at the same instant in the sun's light, and enjoy its entireness, and if He can make one and the same voice resound in the ears of all the listeners, is He not able to give the body of Christ, whole and entire, to as many as wish to receive It?

Is it necessary that this Sacrament should be received in both forms?

No, for as it has already been said, Christ is wholly present, Flesh and Blood, Humanity and Divinity, Body and Soul, in each of the forms. Christ promises eternal life to the recipient also of one form when He says,: I f any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever, and the bread that I will give, is my flesh for the life of the world. (John. VI. 52.) The first Christians, in times of persecution, received this Sacrament only in the form of bread in their houses. Though in earlier times the faithful, like the priests, partook of the chalice, it was not strictly required, and the Church for important reasons has since ordered the reception of Communion under but one form, because there was danger that the blood of our Lord might be spilled, and thus dishonored; because as the Blessed Sacrament must always be ready for the sick, it was feared that the form of wine might be injured by long preservation; because many cannot endure the taste of wine; because in some countries there is scarcity of wine, and it can be obtained only at great cost and with much difficulty, and finally, in order to refute the error of those who denied that Christ is entirely present under each form.

Which area the effects of holy Communion?

The graces of this most holy Sacrament are, as the Roman Catechism says, innumerable; it is the fountain of all grace, for it ,contains the Author of all the Sacraments, Christ our Lord, all goodness and perfection. According to the doctrine of the? Church , there are six special effects of grace produced by, this Sacrament in those who worthily receive it. It unites the recipient with Christ, which Christ plainly shows when He says: He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood, abideth in me and I in him; (John VI. 57.) hence the name Communion, of which St. Leo writes: "The participation of the Body and Blood of Christ transforms ' us into that which we receive," and from this union with Christ, our Head, arises also a closer union with our brethren in Christ, into one body. (I Cor. X. 17.) It preserves and increases sanctifying grace, which is the spiritual life of the soul, for our Saviour says: He that eateth me, the, same also shall live by me. (John VI, 58.) It diminishes in us concupiscence and strengthens us against the temptations of the devil. St. Bernard says: "This holy Sacrament produces two effects in us, it diminishes gratification in venial sins, it removes the full consent in grievous sins; if any of you do not feel so often now the harsh emotion of anger, of envy, or impurity, you owe it to the Body and Blood of the Lord:" and St. Chrystostom: "When we communicate worthily we return from the table like fiery lions, terrible to the devils." It causes us to perform good works with strength and courage; for be who abides in Christ, and Christ in him, bears much fruit. (John XV.) It effaces venial sin, and preserves from mortal sin, as St. Ambrose says: "This daily bread is used as a help against daily weakness: and as by the enjoyment of this holy Sacrament, we are made in a special manner the property, the lams of Christ, which He Himself nourishes with His own heart's blood, He does not permit us to be taken out of His hands, so long as we cooperate with His grace, by prayer, vigilance and contest. It brings us to a glorious resurrection and to eternal happiness; for he who communicates worthily, possesses Him who is the resurrection and the life, (John XI. 25.) who said: He that eatheth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in the last day. (John VI, 55.) He has, therefore, in Christ a pledge, that he will rise in glory and live for ever. If the receiving of this Sacrament produces such great results, how frequently and with what sincere desire should we hasten ~ to enjoy this heavenly banquet, this fountain of all grace! The first Christians received it daily, and St. Augustine says: "Daily receive what daily benefits!" and St. Cyril: The baptized may know that they remove themselves far from eternal life, when they remain a long time from Communion." Ah, whence comes in our days, the indifference, the weakness, the impiety of so many Christians but from the neglect and unworthy reception of Communion! Christian soul, close not your ears to the voice of Jesus who invites you so tenderly to His banquet: Come to me all you who are heavily laden and I will refresh you. Go often, very often to Him; but when you go to Him, do not neglect to prepare for His worthy reception, and you will soon feel its effects in your soul.

In what does the worthy preparation for this holy Sacrament consist?

The worthy preparation of the soul consists in purifying ourselves by a sincere confession from all grievous sins, and in approaching the holy table with profound humility, sincere love, and with fervent desire. He who receives holy Communion in the state of mortal sin draws down upon himself, as the, apostle says, judgment and condemnation. The worthy preparation of the body consists in fasting from midnight before receiving Communion, and in coming properly dressed to the Lord's banquet.

The holy Sacrament of the Altar is preserved in the tabernacle, in front of which a light is burning day and night, to show that Christ, the light of the world, is here present, that we may bear in mind that every Christian congregation should contain in itself the light of faith, the flame of hope, the warmth of divine love, and the fire of true devotion, by a pious life manifesting and consuming itself, like a light, in. the service of God. As a Christian you must believe that under the appearance of bread Christ is really present in the tabernacle, and that He is your Redeemer, your Saviour, your Lord and King, the best Friend and Lover of your soul, whose pleasure it is to dwell among the children of men; then it is your duty often to visit Him in this most holy Sacrament, and offer Him your homage and adoration, "It is certain," says: St. Alphonsus Ligouri, that next to the enjoyment of this holy Sacrament in Communion, the adoration of Jesus in this Sacrament is the best and most pleasing of all devotional exercises, and of the greatest advantage to us." Hesitate not, therefore, to practice this devotion. From this day renounce at least a quarter of an hour's intercourse with others, and go to church to entertain yourself there with Christ. Know that the time which you spend in this way will be of the greatest consolation to, you in the hour of death and through all eternity. Visit Jesus not only in the church, but also accompany and adore Him when carried in processions, or to sick persons. You will thus show your Lord the homage due to Him, gather great merits for yourself, and have the sure hope that Christ will one day repay you a hundredfold.

1. Thus St. Ignatius, the Martyr, who was instructed by the apostles themselves, rebukes in these words those who even at that time would not believe in the change of the bread and wine into the body and blood of the. Lord: "They do not believe that the real body of Jesus Christ our Redeemer who suffered for us and has risen from death is contained in the Sacrament of the Altar." (Ep. ad Smyr.) Thus St. Irenaeus who was a disciple of St. Polycarp, a pupil of St. John the Evangelist, writes: "Of the bread is made the body of Christ" (Lib. IV adv. haer.) In the same manner St. Cyril: "Since Christ our Lord said of this bread, This is my body, who dares doubt it? Since He said, This is my blood, who dares to say, it is not His blood?" (Lib. IV. regul. Cat.) and in another place: "Bread and wine which before the invocation of the most Holy Trinity were only bread and wine, become after this invocation the body and blood of Christ." (Cat. myrt. I.)

What can the unbelievers say to this testimony? Do they know the truth better than those apostles who themselves saw and heard Jesus at the Last Supper, and who taught their disciples that which they had seen and heard? All Christian antiquity proves the error of these heretics.

Juan O’ Savin: Makes His Most Explosive Speech Ever!!

 

Another Food Processing Plant Erupts In Flames, The 97th Suspicious Event Since Start of 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiHIBVHJ69o

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/news-am3gdtgynh2135 

06/13/22

Our nation is SUFFERING. Our economy is in the gutter. Inflation is rampant. Gas prices have reached an all-time high. Ships are unable to unload cargo. Families cannot get needed baby formula. We are an embarrassment around the world. Our withdrawal from Afghanistan was a disaster that cost us precious American blood, and gave $85 billion worth of the best military equipment on earth to our enemy.

Millions and millions of illegals are marching to the border and invading our country. We have a White House in shambles, with Democrats, just this week, declaring that Biden is unfit to run for reelection. And what is the Democrat Congress focused on? A Kangaroo Court, hoping to distract the American people from the great pain they are experiencing. 

Seventeen months after the events of January 6th, Democrats are unable to offer solutions. They are desperate to change the narrative of a failing nation, without even making mention of the havoc and death caused by the Radical Left just months earlier. Make no mistake, they control the government. They own this disaster. They are hoping that these hearings will somehow alter their failing prospects.

A certain Democrat once said, “It's the economy, stupid.” Well, Democrats now seem to think that Americans are “stupid.” They are not. America is crumbling, and Democrats have no solutions. Our nation has no hope of change for the better under Democrat leadership. People are desperate. Rather than solving problems, Democrats are rehashing history in hopes of changing the narrative. During my time in office, our nation was thriving, our economy was strong, and the price of gas was very low. Above all else, we were respected, perhaps like never before.  America prospered under the Trump Administration.  

Continue reading here.  

https://cdn.nucleusfiles.com/e7/e746fae9-7a5f-462d-a0dd-dd9a11895451/statement-by-president-donald-j.-trump.pdf

Game Over, They’re Pulling the Plug – Bill Holter

 https://usawatchdog.com/game-over-theyre-pulling-the-plug-bill-holter/

By Greg Hunter On June 14, 2022 In Market Analysis 48 Comments

How to Make a Judge Understand You

 By Anna Von Reitz

You have been summoned to a hearing and charges have been brought against your estate or some derivative corporation thereof.  They will call your name. 

You answer:  John Michael is my Given Name.  McShay is a Family Name. 

The Prosecutor or Prosecuting Attorney gives their spiel.  Then it's your turn. 

You say: "The Prosecutor has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted."   -- This is the equivalent of a demurrer in their system.  It challenges their jurisdiction and any presumptions they are making. 

You say, "I am a man (or woman) in the common sense of the word, speaking to you as a man."  --- This denies any fanciful interpretation of what a "man" is and takes the judge out of office and makes him liable for what he does. 

You say, "I am an American requiring pass through service."  This makes it clear who you are and makes it more obvious what your business with the court is. 

You say, "I am a claimant, not a complainant."  That is telling the judge that you are not acting as the "Defendant" or "DEFENDANT" in any controversy, and removes the substance of the case out of the jurisdiction of the Municipal COURT. 

You say, "I am claiming my property and my credit, both, here and now."  This leaves them no wiggle room.  Especially in mortgage cases, this tells them that you are claiming all the credit generated by your signature --- usually ten times the entire amount of the purported "loan", plus the house you already paid for.  

You say, "I am making you and the Clerk my Assigns to negotiate the through-traffic, settle all liens and charges, and return the remainder to me via Cashier's Check."

If they ask for a mailing address (another trick), you reply: "Send it in care of my Mailbox ---- Number 97899, in Salem, Oregon, 96756." 

This just made the Judge and the Clerk responsible for doing for you, what they've been doing for themselves and the banks.  They have to pay off the mortgage, deduct their fees, and return the remainder to you.  

And if they don't and the action goes to appeal, they will lose their jobs. 

Now, doesn't that just give you a warm fuzzy feeling all over?  No need to write anything.  No need to suffer over making motions or writing briefs or any of the rest of it.  Just take control of the situation, establish your position, tell them who you are (and aren't) and what your business with the court is, give them their task to do and authorize them to do it for you according to your instructions.

It works just as well for civil cases as criminal cases.  The only difference is that you are facing a "Prosecutor" in a criminal case and a "Prosecuting Attorney" in a civil case, so in your opening Demurrer you would say, "The Prosecutor has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted" for a criminal charge, or "The Prosecuting Attorney failed to.... "  

Depending on when "your" mortgage was generated, you will walk out with several times the total mortgage amount worth of credit --- that your signature generated, minus reasonable and customary fees.  

The bank and/or servicing company goes home with a blue nose and black eye -- for once.  

The Judge sits there with an odd look on his face, staring at the Prosecuting Attorney who now has to pay the court the bid bond and performance bond on the case out of his or her own pocket.  Or, have the whole action tossed out, with prejudice, so that they can never go after you again regarding that mortgage or whatever other issue. 

There is always a silver lining.  This is it. Learn who you are.  Learn who they are.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

About Public and International Notice -- and Obama's Activities

 By Anna Von Reitz

When a President travels abroad there are public meetings and private meetings.  During Obama's trip to Belgium featured in my recent release, the content of the private meeting was secretly recorded.  These are two different audiences.  One private meeting with predominantly Bar Association Members took place before the public meeting with the politicians and bureaucrats predominating. 

Mr. Obama was put in power by the Queen's men.  His mission was and is to destroy the fiat currency.  His further mission is to promote monarchy as the only form of government and her son as the king of the world.  

Although I allow lots of room for speculation as to the "king's" identity, and personally believe that it may prove to be the Lord Mayor or some other character besides Prince Charles, there is no doubt that pushing a system of oppressive monarchy has been the agenda of these cretins all along. 

See the Secret Treaty of Verona as an example.  The cronies that benefit from the feudal system of monarchy always want a king --- and demand it, just as they demanded it of the prophet Samuel.   In this way, they succeed in substituting a man that they control in place of the True God. 

Mr. Obama, despite all the efforts to paper over the facts, is a Kenyan.  And there is no real reason that a Kenyan can't serve as the "President" of a commercial corporation anywhere on Earth ---- the necessity of creating a Hawaiian birth record for him was only for public appearances.  

So what they are doing is technically "legal" just as describing Abraham Lincoln as "President" of the United States of America, ----Incorporated, was technically legal.  They have made a lot of advances on such puerile deceptions, but it is time they were stopped. 

Having a private meeting at the same location and not filming it, and then holding a public meeting and filming it, is just more of the same. 

It's time we all woke up.  

It's time to realize that with them, the cure is always the killer.  And nothing is as it appears. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 3700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Special Silver Sale available for immediate Shipment

This order is all spoken for but call back in a day or three to see if we got all the funds. 

We have an order of 500 ounces of our Prospector divisible rounds in stock and available for immediate shipment.  These are brand new, minted in the last week, and shipped to us on consignment from our mint in Utah.  They have never done that before, which gives you an idea of our reputation with that mint.  We have them in our possession and they will be shipped from Montana. 

They are a divisible round so you can make change when silver goes to it's true value shortly.

.999 fine, one troy ounce, 31.1 grams per round.

We will be shipping these via UPS Ground and fully insured. You can buy all 500 ounces or any part of these in 100 ounce increments at the price of $29.80 per ounce plus shipping.

The shipping will be calculated once you call us and varies depending on your location.  We only ship to USA States. No out of country orders please.

These won't last long, since the wait time from the mint we use is now 4 to 6 months on new orders.

The last time we sold these the order was taken within 11 minutes.

Payment by cashiers check or wire transfer only. No credit cards accepted on this special sale.

To inquire or order call us at  406 889 3183

They will ship once we have your funds.

Paul Stramer

pstramer@gmail.com  406 889 3183