By Jack and Margy Flynn
http://www.citizensoftheamericanconstitution.org/
C/o P.O. Box 292
Bingham, Maine
THANKSGIVING NEWSLETTER – NOVEMBER 24, 2009
This year has gone very quickly for us, as well as for the many people who contact us, and, incredibly, Thanksgiving is now just a few days away. Margy and I wish you and yours a very happy Thanksgiving, and despite all the vast problems that “We, the People”, face, both personally and collectively, there are still things for which we are and should be thankful. We have many things on our “Thank You” list and we hope that is true for each of you. It has been some time since we did a newsletter, because the demands upon our time over the past several months have prevented us from even putting together a few hours to do so. To make up for our inability to compose more frequent newsletters, there is a lot of information in this one.
At long last, we moved to Maine, the first of October, during the beauty and brilliance of a New England Fall. For the past 15 years, as most of you know, we lived in New Mexico, which was a “mixed bag” for us. While we very much enjoyed and appreciated its natural beauty, we also experienced many different political situations, both positive and negative. Among the positive, we assembled some good people in that extremely corrupt state who took lawful actions against government and corporate abuses and won hundreds of cases in the New Mexico courts. The negative is that the vast corruption and suppression of our Rights, guaranteed in both Constitutions, is still present in that state, carried out by “public servants” who have sold out the People in exchange for financial and political power, and, sadly, the injustice they oversee will continue, until a large segment of the People, and not just a few, take Constitutional actions to stop these hypocritical government traitors in our midst.
It should be obvious by now to the vast majority of people in America that all of our governments, federal, state, county and local, do NOT represent the People, and, with rare exceptions, never did. These corporations, without Constitutional authority to exist, masquerading as governments, are devious, sinister, vastly corrupt and protect the interests of their true masters, at the severe expense of the Citizens for whom they are supposed to work. Just as in New Mexico, a few committed people can make a serious dent in corrupt government, but it takes large numbers of concerned Citizens using proven Constitutional methods to make lasting changes. Until that happens in every state in this Nation, the present governments will continue their tyrannical oppression and horrendous abuse of the People.
The serious problem of foreclosure is growing to massive proportions and has already hurt millions of Americans. Your government has not done one thing to benefit any victim of foreclosure, but has definitely benefited the perpetrators of foreclosures, with massive financial wealth, ALL at the Peoples’ expense. This is YOUR government and your system at work. Well over a year ago, we predicted on Pastor Massad’s radio program, Higher Ground Live, broadcast on www.truthradio.com, that there would be a catastrophic financial disaster in the banking and investment communities and that the “fed” would bail out these whores in the amount of 8 trillion dollars, initially, but the eventual amount would be three times that figure. Unfortunately for America, that prediction came true, and now the total bailout is nearly 25 trillion dollars – for those who caused the problems! Your government handed over unfathomable wealth to evil, shameless criminals; yet, did not give the People anything to relieve their tragic situations nor even approve a paltry cost of living increase for social security. Everything for the bankers and ruling elite, but NOTHING for the People. That is how much your government thinks of its people. But why should it think otherwise, because the People, as a society, do absolutely nothing, even when they have ample reasons to do SOMETHING. A few people cannot do it, but the society could, if masses of people so chose.
If this government had any true concern for the People, then, it could have done several things, which would have helped alleviate the foreclosure problem. Of course, this government is not really interested in solving problems; its only interest is creating them and then applying their “bankster” buddies’ fraudulent “solutions” to further benefit enormous wealth and power, at further expense to the People! Doesn’t this sound like the ruthless kings of old and third-world dictatorial regimes – only ten times worse - because the American government is supposed to be “the good guys”, and America is supposed to be “the land of the free” and full of economic opportunity for everyone? Disturbingly, the reality the average people are living does not match the propaganda the government and its media lackeys are spewing! The government, by and through the private “fed”, could have spent about 2 percent of that 25 trillion and retired those mortgages which were delinquent, saved countless homes, prevented millions of people from losing their piece of the “American Dream” and averted untold emotional trauma and human suffering. Just think what that would have done for a troubled economy! The government could also have done what we have suggested, forever, which is to nationalize the banking system, including the “fed”, and nationalize the oil industry. The money system Constitutionally is decreed to the People, by and through congress, and not through private corporations, and the oil resources and wealth of this Nation rightfully belong to the People, and not to private interests, who have manipulated oil to unbelievable extremes, again, at the great expense of the general public. Some would disagree with this, but some would also disagree with the fact that Hitler, Stalin, Tojo, Roosevelt and Churchill were evil, hypocritical, murderous bastards responsible for the death and suffering of untold numbers of human beings.
Anyone in foreclosure or about to go into foreclosure, obviously, has a very serious problem, not only on the face of the financial implications, but also deep within our so-called “justice” system because of the corporate nature of governments and the courts, which will find for the bank, in virtually all cases, unless given valid, compelling reasons to do otherwise. The only way the homeowner can fight this is to hold the judge to his oath, then demonstrate to the court that the bank has no standing in this matter and cannot produce the original note and contract documents. There are numerous foreclosure methods all over the Internet, and many people teaching foreclosure methods all over the country. Some of them have value, and could possibly produce beneficial results for the homeowner. However, many of these methods are initially very costly, very complex and convoluted, and if successful, additional heavy costs can be incurred by the homeowner. A lot of these methods present “boilerplate” paper work, theoretically designed to resolve the situation, but most of these cases go to court where the Citizen cannot stand on paperwork he does not fully understand and which he cannot articulate convincingly before the court, because he is not well versed enough to present logical, valid arguments to a corporate court which will not even listen to them, unless presented skillfully and confidently. For those methods that do work, we wish them and their users much success and exposure to others all across this Nation.
Our very simple, direct Constitutional methods that have proven very effective can be applied to virtually anything, including foreclosure. This approach simplifies the matter and prepares the homeowner to argue his case in court, if necessary. The unconstitutional, unlawful corporate courts which serve the interests of wealth, power and corruption are intimidating to most people, who usually freeze before authority; thus they are not able to effectively argue their lawful positions before a corrupt judge, who is part of and partial to a corporation. We establish our cases in such a way that the opposition usually admits to all our charges before we even arrive in court. Courts convene to hear and adjudicate matters in controversy between two parties in proper and lawful standing before the court. However, since (i) our opponents have already admitted to our charges; (ii) our opponents cannot demonstrate proper, lawful standing before the court; (iii) our opponents cannot truthfully defend against our charges; and (iv) courts only convene to hear matters in controversy between two parties in lawful standing, and neither of these lawful requirements exist, then, the victory is ours, lawfully and Constitutionally.
Our proven Constitutional methods are presented on our web site, listed above, specifically in the Metris v. Edwards case. They are simple, direct, logical and to the point and involve presumptive letter(s), affidavit(s), filings on the public record, notices of suit, Constitutional court challenges and lawful demands that our opposition support their claims with valid fact, law and evidence, or the victory is ours. We begin by writing presumptive letters to our opponent, in which we make our claims, charges and statements, all based in truth, fact, law and evidence. We presume that our charges are true and correct unless rebutted by our opponents, which rebuttals rarely come. The reason our opponent fails to rebut our charges is because our charges are based only in truth, fact, law and evidence, which is very difficult for even the most astute lawyer to rebut. The opponent usually does not respond, and if he does, the response is off point and not specific to the charges. We begin and end the letter with a presumptive paragraph, and state our charges between these two paragraphs. The essence of the presumptive paragraphs informs the opponent that he has been lawfully notified of our charges, and if he fails to rebut them, in writing, to us within 30 days of his receipt thereof, then he admits to all charges, fully binding upon him in any court, without his protest, objection, or that of those who represent him. Opponents rarely receive such binding language from “ordinary” people, and usually do not know how to respond, so usually do not.
If we were ever in a foreclosure action brought against us by a bank, mortgage company, etc., we would state in the presumptive letter ALL the deceptive, fraudulent actions and terms perpetrated against us by the bank, and specifically point out the fraudulent issues within the note that were either not disclosed, at all, or not fully disclosed, in this adhesion contract, prior to closing. We would also state that the bank is not in possession of the original note/contract/mortgage, and in the rare case that it can be produced, it was not signed by an authorized bank officer; therefore, the bank was not a signatory to the note and has no proper, lawful standing before the court to enforce foreclosure on a note to which it is not a party. If the bank expects the court to award a home to the bank, which has no valid, lawful proven claim, supported by specific original documents, and to which the bank is party, then the bank expects the court to award it a home in opposition to lawful requirements and thereby violate, at minimum, due process of law, as well as be complicit in fraud. It is highly unlikely that any bank can or will rebut these charges, and if they do not, then the bank admits to them, fully binding in any court, without their protest, objection, or that of those who represent them.
As stated, our Constitutional methods are spelled out in detail on our website, listed above. Briefly, if the bank fails to respond, then, we write the bank an affidavit. A sample affidavit is available on our website. The affidavit informs the bank that it failed to rebut our charges, therefore, pursuant to the lawful notification contained in the presumptive letter, it admits to all of them, and we list some of the charges to which the bank admits. Then, we invite the bank to rebut our affidavit by their own sworn, notarized affidavit, attested to under the penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, with their rebuttal supported by valid facts, law and evidence. Since it is virtually impossible for any bank to rebut our true facts, law and evidence, they do not respond with an affidavit in rebuttal. In the fifty plus years each of us has been doing this no one has ever rebutted our affidavits with their own affidavits – for obvious reasons! If the bank does not rebut by affidavit within the specified 30 days, then, we record our affidavit on the public record, which makes it self-authenticating, thus, admissible in a court of law.
When we go to court, we hold the judge to his oath and his requirement to abide by his oath in the performance of his official duties. As mentioned, we have a series of Constitutional Court Challenges which we use all the time and which are also spelled out on our website. The bottom line in all of this is that our opponent has no valid position, at all, has never rebutted our valid positions, stated in our letter and affidavit, and cannot produce the originals of the note and other documents before the court; thus, has no lawful standing before the court to bring a foreclosure action. The judge, pursuant to his oath, has no lawful authority to award our home to a bank that cannot demonstrate a valid claim against our property by producing the original note/contract/mortgage. If the judge were to do so, then, he would be complicit in fraud. There are other matters, which we could go into on this issue, but this will suffice for now.
Anyone in or facing foreclosure who wants to use these methods can get full details about them on the website, as stated above. It is imperative, in our opinions, that people be well vested in their own situations, be able to present them in writing and make good presentations before the court, and know how to hold the court to Constitutional mandates. This is what we teach in our seminars. If people want to learn how to properly speak for themselves before the court, in a logical, lawful manner, with paperwork that supports their positions and which they can understand, then, we would be glad to present a seminar on these methods, if enough people in one area were to express an interest in this. In places such as Las Vegas, Nevada, with nearly 82 percent of those who have mortgages on their homes “underwater”, it appears that the foreclosure problem could swell into a tidal wave. The only cost to the homeowner for learning our methods is his donation for our seminar appearance. There are no strings, financial or otherwise, attached to any wins, as exist in some of the other methods being presented. If interested, please contact us at supremelawseminars@yahoo.com.
All of our hundreds of victories for our New Mexico group have taken place in New Mexico state courts. We stay as far away from the lawless federal courts as possible. However, many of you may know that Margy filed a lawsuit against the public officers of the city of Las Vegas and their insurers for their fraud committed against Margy when she ran for city council in 2006. The lawyers for these criminals realized they could not win a case against Margy in the local state district court, in which she filed suit, and before a local jury, very aware of the vast corruption in that city, so they unlawfully removed it to federal district court.
Margy fought this on many grounds, including jurisdiction. Her opponents had connections with the court and expected a quick dismissal of her case, in part, because the lead attorney for defendants had a close familial relationship with the district judge assigned to Margy’s case, who also just happens to be the chief judge for all federal courts in New Mexico. Is this type of thing a surprise to anyone? Under pressure from Margy, that judge recused herself, which is very rare in federal courts which do little or nothing for ordinary Citizens. Also under pressure from Margy, the magistrate judge assigned to administrate discovery scheduling, vacated all discovery proceedings, which simply does not happen in federal courts for the benefit of a Citizen. The new district judge assigned to the case did not grant a sanctions motion brought by Margy’s opponents because Margy refused to surrender her Rights to unconstitutional court rules and procedures regarding discovery, which, to our knowledge, has NEVER happened in any federal court for the benefit of a Citizen who exercised her full Rights guaranteed in both Constitutions, and who held both judges to their sworn oaths.
The quick dismissal her opponents expected from the corrupt federal court has not occurred, and this case is now approaching two years, next month. A few updates may be of interest to you. In the new discovery scheduling, established by the new district judge, and not by the magistrate, who has apparently vanished from this case, Margy’s opponents, stated in the Final Joint Status Report that they STIPULATE TO HER FOUNDATIONAL CHARGES. Since the courts convene to hear and adjudicate disputes, and since her opponents ADMIT to her main charges, from which all her other charges emanate, then it appears there is nothing for the court to hear and the victory, lawfully and Constitutionally, should go to Margy. In a just court system, this would definitely be the case, but since this Nation has no just court system or government, only time will tell. Further, her opponents did not participate in new discovery proceedings, with interrogatories, request for admissions or request for production of documents. This entire case is a serious matter, much larger than not winning a small town election, since it involves fraud conducted during an election by public officers, all of whom have been protected by the federal court. We will keep you informed.
As many of you know, Americans have been highly and expertly conditioned and programmed for such a long time that it is easy to see why they, as a society, do nothing against the lawless governments, which are attacking them on all levels, and simply do and pay whatever government demands of them. They ask few, if any, questions, object to and challenge nothing, and if a murmur of disgruntlement and protest does exist, it is not serious and has no “teeth”. With this type of society, it is very easy for government to control the People in any way it wants. This is not the mark of a healthy, sane and ethical society, and America is far from that. Thank God for the few individuals in this country who have made and are making differences! Amazingly, it has been a phenomenon throughout history that virtually all societies on this planet have believed and supported the lie and fraud, while they disparage and often destroy the truth and righteous actions. The lie and fraud are given great reverence and respect by American society, but the truth and its messenger are ignored and receive little, if any, support and, in fact, are usually disparaged, vilified and eradicated.
A brief look around America and her actions throughout the globe demonstrates that our American society not only engages in wrongdoing, but also actively supports, that which is wrong and the lie which creates and implements it. To make things even worse, even the “average guy”, out of indolence, ignorance, indifference and/or fear, does the wrong thing in the ordinary course of life, rather than the right thing. Expedience has replaced honor, and the quest for the “almighty buck” has replaced the belief in Almighty God. American values are so skewed that most people seem to oppose truth, as their normal custom and practice, especially if recognizing the truth could cost them their time, money, position, or, in some instances, their lives. Why? Why would any decent human being knowingly or unknowingly advocate for the lie and destroy the truth? Who benefits? Who is the “father of the lie”? In order for this seeming contradiction to continuously occur, we have to understand that we are, and have been, products of extensive, unrelenting programming and intense conditioning, on multiple levels, to implement THE BIG LIE, and always have been; thus, we have served our programmers well by accepting, putting into action and supporting their evil agenda by living their lies which are designed to destroy all that is or was good in us.
America’s government has proven itself to be a notorious LIAR, without ANY honor. What rational Citizen could ever believe such a liar? American society does not THINK, because that capacity has been stolen from our society by the very institutions, which should be cultivating it. If this society were to think, would it have allowed this escalating degeneration of our minds, bodies, hearts, souls and spirits to drag us down into the type of country we now have? We must always go to the bottom line first, then, see how we got there. America’s journey to the bottom line has been a disaster for most Americans, but an enormous success, at all levels, for its evil masters. Maybe with the massive fraud, corruption, planned economic disasters, vast job losses, wholesale foreclosures of property and continuing obliteration of Rights - to name just a few - hitting them squarely in the face, Americans might begin to think, which would be a rarity, and if enough were to think and question, they might come to the realization that they have been pawns and puppets in the hands of masters who have controlled them from the very beginning of this Nation, as they have controlled this entire “civilized” world for millennia.
When any society has been as tightly and ruthlessly controlled, as has been America, obviously there is a purpose and reasons behind the controlling agenda. Americans have not only been socially engineered by their masters, but also engineered in every other possible way evil can imagine and devise, such as politically, economically, educationally, institutionally, militarily, religiously and financially, etc., etc. Again, if this were not true, then why have Americans allowed America to degenerate into something that is not even a shadow of the mythical America we all once loved? All the promise, once inherent in this Nation has been lost to the apathetic indifference and ignorance of this very disappointing society. Go to the bottom line and see how we got there, and who led the way. The educational system here has been a fraud for over 100 years, yet American society has done nothing about it. Why? For the past 25 years or so, those who control America’s education have introduced programs to further control the life cycle of students, in all ways throughout life, including limiting students to one type of work, based upon government approval, even to the grave. What has American SOCIETY done to stop this? Absolutely nothing, except for a few brave, outspoken INDIVIDUALS, who tried to stop this, but who got nowhere. That is not enough. If Americans fail to support their own Rights and our own professed values, then we have no Rights and no real values.
The control imposed upon America is much more devious then it appears. In fact, the average dumbed-down American, the prize product of the referenced programming and conditioning, would look you in the eye and emphatically tell you how free he is. He has no clue as to just how dark the conspiracy against the entire American experiment actually is. Rather than just being simply a well-vested cartel with vast wealth, enormous power and pervasive influence at their disposal, (As if this is not enough!), America’s masters are truly evil and sinister to an extreme unfathomable by “normal” human standards. Thanks to the perverse conditioning to which humans have been exposed, would you believe that a fairly large segment of human society actually envy these evil masters and would like to be in their positions? Those who rule us are an evil elite, operating not only here, but also in every nation on this planet, and frankly always have. Evil has ruled this planet from its very inception and human societies have always, without exception, supported that evil, either actively or passively, and given it its way. Man has not socially, politically, morally or ethically evolved over the many millennia and has not become aware of truth and reality, so why would society be any different today? If we go to the bottom line and work backwards, what movements or processes or accepted philosophies have transformed human society into thinking, independent, aware and responsible human beings? I think that most of us could agree that none have done this, or we would not be in these dire circumstances.
The old fight between Good and Evil is as much here, now, in our present America, as it has always been on this planet. In fact, this appears to be the major battleground for the culmination of this long struggle. Human society, including America, supports evil and opposes good, no matter what humans would like to think. If humans had supported good and opposed evil, long ago, and continued that behavior to the present day, then, evil on this planet and in America would not be the overwhelming force that it now is and has always been. It is really that simple, no matter how complex and contrived evil manipulates the truth about how it controls people’s perception about reality. Please remember that good reveals and simplifies, while evil obscures and complicates. Humans say one thing, but do another. They think one thing, then, do the opposite. They say they do not support evil, but their actions say otherwise. Evil is very clever, very devious and very committed to its goal, and considers humans lower than scum and not worthy of any consideration whatsoever. American society embraced evil at the very start, but had little understanding of what they were doing. This is normal for humans and societies. They accept wrongdoing as normal, and over time it is impossible for them to discern the very evil that exists all around them. The more perversity one sees; the more “normal” perversity seems to be and the more he accepts it and perpetrates it. This is similar to the man who cannot see the forest because the trees are in the way or to the woman who no longer hears the roar of the freight trains passing by her home because she has gotten used to the noise. When man accepts wrong as right, good as evil, and evil as good, then, supports evil governments bent upon his own destruction, clearly, any rational, independent observer would say that man conspires with, aids and abets those who enslave him. What other possible logical explanation can exist? Remember, the bottom line is ALWAYS the bottom line.
Does anyone think that those politicians and “public servants” in the district of criminals - ALL of them - who many Americans naively think represent them, and those politicians in your own state governments, are pure as the driven snow? Even a simpleton can quickly answer this. Since these vermin are not pure, then they are un-pure in varying degrees. Since most of them, at least in Washington, are multi-millionaires, and most, everywhere are also lawyers, most rational people could say that they have no honor, no ethics and no concern for the people whom they theoretically represent. As is often said, talk is cheap, while actions speak volumes. What these whores say is not matched by their actions, so they lie, and lie, and lie, yet the American people continue to elect them to office and continue to support the lies these thugs-and-thieves-in-suits tell them. Again, it is all too easy for any government to control such a complacent, gullible, ignorant and lazy society, which continuously believes and supports the lie, the fraud, and those who commit them.
The diabolical nature of our American governments and those who comprise them is so obvious to the aware, reasonable, rational Citizen, with some common sense, but not many of these people exist in America. As we have said many times, there are few good Patriots remaining in this Nation, and those few may not be enough to restore any semblance of Constitutional governance in our country. Good versus evil is everywhere in this world, and those “public servants” referenced herein are evil, support evil, and always will support evil, and always will oppose and crush Good. They have adopted Evil as their God or their mantra for life, and thus, serve evil very well. If one objective Citizen were to look at the vast evil this nation has perpetrated upon this planet, since, at minimum, from 1910 on, all of which is disguised as doing “good”, but when closely examined, actually serves evil, then, the logical conclusion at which he would arrive is that America is an evil nation, so evil that it perpetrates evil on its own Citizens, and the Citizens accept that evil by continuing to support their government. What madness is this? Is there ANY sanity left in this nation? When a government enslaves its own people to a private monetary system for the benefit of the evil elite, as America’s governments have done, and then enters into ongoing, wide-scale destructions through two world wars and numerous other wars, conflicts, “police actions”, “peace-keeping actions”, etc., and instituted and supported tyrannical dictatorial regimes, initiated biological terrorism throughout the world, all of which, combined, have killed 250 million people, at minimum, then, how can ANY good American defend the actions of the American governments who have done these horrible acts over many, many decades?
Take the enormous profit out of war, and see how many wars we would have. Put that profit into peace, and see how much peace we would have. This society is a win-at-any-cost, commit-evil, do-no-good, profit-driven society, so our profit and revenue are derived from evil and that which supports evil, and not from goodness, ethics, morals or any semblance of justice. It chooses to support evil and chooses to avoid that which is good. What madness exists in this Nation and this world, when a so-called “good” society chooses the expediency of evil over the inconvenience of doing good? If one believes in the goodness of God, how can he believe in the evil that is America and the society, which supports it?
With all the murderous frauds that America has perpetrated upon its own Citizens, within the time period referenced, such as the sinking of the Titanic to eliminate many opponents of the proposed federal reserve system; the sinking of the Lusitania which led to WWI; the “Spanish Flu”, which killed about 150 million people, worldwide, and about 20 million in America; the unconscionable attack, conducted by the “hero” generals, Eisenhauer, McArthur and Patten, upon WWI Veterans, who dared try to get the bonuses their government had promised them, but never delivered, which resulted in their and their families being shot and burned to death as they camped in Washington, D.C., “The Great Depression”, in which countless people and entire families starved and froze to death, and many others lost their homes and all their worldly possessions to the rotten thieves who helped create the “crash”, so they could steal from its victims; the contrived attack on Pearl Harbor which led to WWII; the “Thin Red Line” in Korea; the Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnam; Waco; Ruby Ridge; the Oklahoma City bombing; 911; the ongoing, absolutely deadly and poisonous aerosol spraying of this nation and the world; the totally fraudulent “Swine Flu”; the horrendous “medical experiments” performed on innocent humans; and the near-total contamination of our air, food, water and soil are more than enough to sicken any honorable human being’s heart, mind, body and soul.
All this said, the American Society has done nothing about these murderous onslaughts and, in fact, has supported them by continuing to support this murderous, vile government, despite the unspeakable evil is has and continues to perpetrate not only upon American Citizens, but also upon humanity-in-general on this planet. These are but a few of the bottom line evils foisted upon hapless people by this nation, and for any rational, reasonable, intelligent human, they are factual and historical and impossible to dispute. In light of all of these very disturbing facts, is this American Society a sane, moral, ethical and humane society, or is it so hypocritical and delusional that it cannot recognize the evil that exists within it and rules it? Do you think this society is worthy of God’s mercy? What do you think God thinks? If you do not believe in God, what do you think a truly decent, compassionate, egalitarian human would think?
If you, dear reader, are truly concerned about America, her People and the direction in which we are headed, please join us in our ongoing Constitutional pursuits to change our present course into one that is sane, ethical, honorable, moral and Constitutional for restoration of just Constitutional governance in this land. Various groups and presenters believe in, support and present non-Constitutional methods. We have said for a long time that any methods, which defeat evil and prove to be effective, should be adopted and continued. However, in the harsh light of reality and truth, few, if any, of these methods prove successful in the long run, and many times, harm the advocate. We ask you this simple question: If self-proclaimed patriots do not use the Constitution to enforce lawful, just governance in this Nation, are they truly patriots, or is it possible that they, knowingly or unknowingly, serve another agenda? Remember, evil is very devious, uses our best instincts against us, is very alluring, makes lots of false promises, but usually delivers just enough to keep one interested, but never enough to really resolve anything, complicates everything to appeal to man’s ego and self-aggrandizing nature, and ultimately misleads, misdirects and corrupts everything in sight.
If you support the true Law of this Land, then, please commit to our cause. Einstein once said, and many others have agreed in various ways, that the world is a dangerous place in which to live, not because of the people who do evil, but because of the ones who don’t do anything about it. Any American who chooses to take no lawful action about the evil force controlling and ruining America, is part of the problem and not part of the solution. Any American who chooses to take lawful action against this evil force is a true patriot. To this end, we leave you with this closing thought, stated by the late renowned anthropologist, Margaret Mead: “Never forget that a small group of committed Citizens can change the world. Indeed it’s the only thing that ever has.”
Best regards,
Jack and Margy
http://www.citizensoftheamericanconstitution.org/
Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 10,360 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. WHAT THEY WRITE IS THEIR OWN OPINION, just as what I write is my own.
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Free Interactive Tax Course, How You Become Liable!
Take this free interactive course on income tax on line and find some answers.
http://howyoubecomeliable.com/
The order the book and CD here:
http://www.losthorizons.com/cc.htm
Earn free silver here: http://www.silversnowball.net/
Buy silver: http://www.teapartysilver.com/
Paul Stramer
P.O. Box 116
Eureka Montana USA
800 889 2839
http://www.silverpatriot.com/
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
Skype: pstramer
http://www.paulstramer.com/
http://howyoubecomeliable.com/
The order the book and CD here:
http://www.losthorizons.com/cc.htm
Earn free silver here: http://www.silversnowball.net/
Buy silver: http://www.teapartysilver.com/
Paul Stramer
P.O. Box 116
Eureka Montana USA
800 889 2839
http://www.silverpatriot.com/
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
Skype: pstramer
http://www.paulstramer.com/
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
The Dollar Bubble is about to explode!
Our new must see documentary on the collapse of the U.S. dollar! Become educated so that you can survive and prosper while many Americans enter poverty! ***The best spent 30 minutes of your life!***
http://inflation.us/videos.html
http://inflation.us/videos.html
Whatever you do, DON'T GIVE UP YOUR GUNS!
We received these comments and the video by email this morning. --------
Here's a great video on gun control. This people gave up and then cried about it. Look at all these gutless men who, had they stood together, may have stopped what happened. They did regret not standing when they had a chance. Will this be our fate too? See any parallels between the bully boys of Europe on gun control and the fear instilled in the majority of people living in Lincoln County? A corrupt minority is controlling an honest majority because the majority is allowing it..
Thank our Creator for ladies like you, and the others in Lincoln County Watch, who do have courage. Where would the county be without people like you.
This will happen in Amerika if we don't take a stand against gun control!
If your guns go away, so does your freedom!
England's increasingly repressive firearms laws often are praised by those who would restrict the American right to arms, so it is important to realize that those firearms laws, which now prohibit the private possession of handguns, rest heavily on one foundation--the British gun owner licensing system. The right to keep and bear arms had been alive in England for eight centuries when Parliament enacted the Pistols Act of 1903. The Act, which prohibited the sale of pistols to minors and felons, also dictated that pistols could be sold only to those who possessed a gun license. Since the license could be obtained at a post office with only the payment of a fee, and since no license was required to keep a pistol solely in the home, there was no opposition. But within a few short years, the licensing system had moved from the post office to the police station. Suddenly, Britons who wanted to own handguns--or rifles--had to prove they had "good reason" for receiving a police permit. Shotguns were considered "sporting" and were exempted from licensing requirements until 1967.
Anti-gun lobbyists in the United States have called for a "needs-based licensing" system and some politicians have lined up to do their bidding.
Is licensing gun owners a good idea? After all, "we license people to drive cars don't we?" If requiring gun owners to obtain a government license seems like a harmless idea to you, you may want to know about "Firearms Form 101." That's the "Application For A Firearms Certificate" that must be filled out by Britons in order to purchase a rifle or muzzleloading handgun. A separate form is required for a "shotgun certificate."
Section 27 of the Firearms Act of 1968 (as amended by the 1997 Act) requires a chief officer of the Police Firearms Licensing Department to be satisfied that the applicant is "fit to be entrusted with a firearm." (Emphasis added) As the applicant, you must provide: * Your home address for the last three years. * Your occupation and business address. * Information about previous convictions, including traffic violations. * Information about any history of Epilepsy. * Information about past treatment for drug use, depression or nervous disorders. * The name of your doctor, and permission for the police to search your medical records to obtain "factual details" about your medical history. * A list of the firearms you already own, including caliber, type, maker's name and serial number. * A list of the ammunition you already own, including caliber and quantity. * A list of the firearms you wish to purchase, stating the reason for wanting to purchase them and where you plan on shooting or hunting with them. * A list of the maximum amount of ammunition you wish to possess at any one time, by caliber. * A list of the maximum amount of ammunition you plan to purchase at any one time, by caliber. * An address where the guns will be stored, for possible future inspection. * Information about whether you have previously held a firearms certificate, or a shotgun certificate. * A letter signed by the secretary of your shooting club or each landowner where you plan to hunt attesting to the fact that you have permission to shoot at those locations. * Four passport size photos of yourself. * A fee of L56 (approximately $90).
As an applicant, you must also designate two "referees" who will fill out a reference form regarding your character. This form will never be shown to you even though it weighs heavily in the final decision to approve or deny the application. The "referees" must: * Have known you for at least the last two years. * Not be a member of your family, a firearms dealer, a police officer or a police employee. * Be of "good character." * Sign the application form declaring that it has been answered truthfully. * Sign and date the back of one of your passport photos attesting that it is an accurate representation of you at that time. * Explain in what capacity they have known you. * Indicate if they are members of a shooting club, and if so their license number and role in the club. * Provide their "opinion as to the applicant's suitability to possess firearms." * Provide information on your personal history, including any history of emotional problems, mental or physical disabilities and explain how knowledge of the information was gained. * Explain any difficulties you have with members of your family which "may give cause for concern given that a firearm or ammunition may be available in the household." * Explain their knowledge of your experience with firearms. * Explain their knowledge of your attitude toward firearms. * Be subjected to a background check and allow personal information to be held on a police computer.
****************************
In Amerika, Judges are already using orders of protection to deny gun ownership to perfectly law abiding people who have never been violent, on the say so of others without proof of any wrongdoing whatsoever, and as a political weapon against their political opposition. Sheriffs are denying concealed carry permits on the basis of orders of protection by judges on the same basis without any proof of any wrongdoing. These so called "justice" courts are not a court of record. The JPs seem to think an order of protection is the solution to everything. They seem to think they can slap an order of protection on anyone without requiring the accusing party to prove anything being alleged. The accusing party usually enjoys the "protection" of the court without being required to submit any evidence to obtain the order of protection. The accused party is usually not allowed to bring witnesses in the court room for hearings on these matters. Evidence in favor of the accused is ignored by judges and orders of protection are granted on the say so of the accusing party alone.
Judges who make these kinds of decisions need to be thrown out of office in the next election.
People who believe in the rule of law, and the maxim of "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" need to be elected to take their place. The Grand Jury needs to be re-established on a permanent basis to investigate corruption in government, especially in the Judicial branch.
DO NOT GIVE UP YOUR GUNS.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Here's a great video on gun control. This people gave up and then cried about it. Look at all these gutless men who, had they stood together, may have stopped what happened. They did regret not standing when they had a chance. Will this be our fate too? See any parallels between the bully boys of Europe on gun control and the fear instilled in the majority of people living in Lincoln County? A corrupt minority is controlling an honest majority because the majority is allowing it..
Thank our Creator for ladies like you, and the others in Lincoln County Watch, who do have courage. Where would the county be without people like you.
This will happen in Amerika if we don't take a stand against gun control!
If your guns go away, so does your freedom!
England's increasingly repressive firearms laws often are praised by those who would restrict the American right to arms, so it is important to realize that those firearms laws, which now prohibit the private possession of handguns, rest heavily on one foundation--the British gun owner licensing system. The right to keep and bear arms had been alive in England for eight centuries when Parliament enacted the Pistols Act of 1903. The Act, which prohibited the sale of pistols to minors and felons, also dictated that pistols could be sold only to those who possessed a gun license. Since the license could be obtained at a post office with only the payment of a fee, and since no license was required to keep a pistol solely in the home, there was no opposition. But within a few short years, the licensing system had moved from the post office to the police station. Suddenly, Britons who wanted to own handguns--or rifles--had to prove they had "good reason" for receiving a police permit. Shotguns were considered "sporting" and were exempted from licensing requirements until 1967.
Anti-gun lobbyists in the United States have called for a "needs-based licensing" system and some politicians have lined up to do their bidding.
Is licensing gun owners a good idea? After all, "we license people to drive cars don't we?" If requiring gun owners to obtain a government license seems like a harmless idea to you, you may want to know about "Firearms Form 101." That's the "Application For A Firearms Certificate" that must be filled out by Britons in order to purchase a rifle or muzzleloading handgun. A separate form is required for a "shotgun certificate."
Section 27 of the Firearms Act of 1968 (as amended by the 1997 Act) requires a chief officer of the Police Firearms Licensing Department to be satisfied that the applicant is "fit to be entrusted with a firearm." (Emphasis added) As the applicant, you must provide: * Your home address for the last three years. * Your occupation and business address. * Information about previous convictions, including traffic violations. * Information about any history of Epilepsy. * Information about past treatment for drug use, depression or nervous disorders. * The name of your doctor, and permission for the police to search your medical records to obtain "factual details" about your medical history. * A list of the firearms you already own, including caliber, type, maker's name and serial number. * A list of the ammunition you already own, including caliber and quantity. * A list of the firearms you wish to purchase, stating the reason for wanting to purchase them and where you plan on shooting or hunting with them. * A list of the maximum amount of ammunition you wish to possess at any one time, by caliber. * A list of the maximum amount of ammunition you plan to purchase at any one time, by caliber. * An address where the guns will be stored, for possible future inspection. * Information about whether you have previously held a firearms certificate, or a shotgun certificate. * A letter signed by the secretary of your shooting club or each landowner where you plan to hunt attesting to the fact that you have permission to shoot at those locations. * Four passport size photos of yourself. * A fee of L56 (approximately $90).
As an applicant, you must also designate two "referees" who will fill out a reference form regarding your character. This form will never be shown to you even though it weighs heavily in the final decision to approve or deny the application. The "referees" must: * Have known you for at least the last two years. * Not be a member of your family, a firearms dealer, a police officer or a police employee. * Be of "good character." * Sign the application form declaring that it has been answered truthfully. * Sign and date the back of one of your passport photos attesting that it is an accurate representation of you at that time. * Explain in what capacity they have known you. * Indicate if they are members of a shooting club, and if so their license number and role in the club. * Provide their "opinion as to the applicant's suitability to possess firearms." * Provide information on your personal history, including any history of emotional problems, mental or physical disabilities and explain how knowledge of the information was gained. * Explain any difficulties you have with members of your family which "may give cause for concern given that a firearm or ammunition may be available in the household." * Explain their knowledge of your experience with firearms. * Explain their knowledge of your attitude toward firearms. * Be subjected to a background check and allow personal information to be held on a police computer.
****************************
In Amerika, Judges are already using orders of protection to deny gun ownership to perfectly law abiding people who have never been violent, on the say so of others without proof of any wrongdoing whatsoever, and as a political weapon against their political opposition. Sheriffs are denying concealed carry permits on the basis of orders of protection by judges on the same basis without any proof of any wrongdoing. These so called "justice" courts are not a court of record. The JPs seem to think an order of protection is the solution to everything. They seem to think they can slap an order of protection on anyone without requiring the accusing party to prove anything being alleged. The accusing party usually enjoys the "protection" of the court without being required to submit any evidence to obtain the order of protection. The accused party is usually not allowed to bring witnesses in the court room for hearings on these matters. Evidence in favor of the accused is ignored by judges and orders of protection are granted on the say so of the accusing party alone.
Judges who make these kinds of decisions need to be thrown out of office in the next election.
People who believe in the rule of law, and the maxim of "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" need to be elected to take their place. The Grand Jury needs to be re-established on a permanent basis to investigate corruption in government, especially in the Judicial branch.
DO NOT GIVE UP YOUR GUNS.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Monday, November 23, 2009
AMERICA HAS A HUMILIATED FOOL FOR A "PRESIDENT"
Written by Jack Kelly
Friday, 20 November 2009
President Obama took his massive ego and sparse historical knowledge to Asia last week. The results were so ugly even the New York Times took notice. Obama's Pacific Trip Encounters Rough Waters was its headline over a news analysis yesterday (11/19).
"Has a president ever been less successful on a trip overseas than President
Obama has on his eight day excursion to Asia," asked Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard. "I've been covering presidents since Gerald Ford and I can't think of one."
The trip began at the Asia Pacific Economic Conference (APEC) in Singapore where Mr. Obama declared himself to be America's first Pacific president, on the grounds that he was born in Hawaii, and lived for a couple of years as a child in Indonesia.
Mr. Obama either forgot or never knew that William Howard Taft had been governor-general of the Philippines before becoming president, or that Richard Nixon -- who spent more time in the Pacific in World War II than Mr. Obama spent in Indonesia -- was responsible for the opening to China.
At the APEC conference, Mr. Obama acknowledged he will be unable to obtain the international agreement on curbing so-called greenhouse gases he has sought. This is good news for the United States, but a setback for him.
From APEC Mr. Obama went to Japan, where he startled his hosts and many of his countrymen by bowing low to Emperor Akihito.
The bow, an academic expert on Japan told Jake Tapper of ABC News, was in the form of a first year English teacher trying to impress with a "Karate Kid level knowledge" of Japanese customs.
The bow as he performed it did not just display weakness in American terms, but evoked weakness in Japanese terms, Mr. Tapper's expert said. The last thing the Japanese want or need is a weak-looking American president and, again, in all ways, he unintentionally played that part.\
The most important stop on the president's itinerary was China, where things went worse for him than they had in Singapore or Japan.
"When it came to China, President Obama's famous powers of persuasion failed to persuade," wrote Barbara Demick in the Los Angeles Times. "Not only is the U.S. president coming away without definable concessions, but the Chinese appeared to be digging in their heels."
Mr. Obama had sought three things in China.
First, he wanted Chinese support for sanctions against Iran's nuclear program. Second, he wanted China to agree to curbs on fossil fuel emissions. Third, he wanted China to agree to a more realistic value for its currency. He got stiffed on all three.
The most important of these is the currency issue. China pegs the value of the renmimbi (also called the yuan) artificially low in relation to the dollar to boost sales of its exports. This essentially mercantilist policy (against which Adam Smith railed in The Wealth of Nations) makes it harder for us to sell things to the Chinese, and for our economy to recover.
What Mr. Obama received was a lecture on the danger of U.S. budget deficits, and criticism of the protectionist policies his administration has implemented.
Mr. Obama was treated with far less respect than were Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush when they visited China.
He acquiesced as the Chinese subjected him to the humiliation of a choreographed town hall meeting with student members of the Young Communist League, Mr. Barnes wrote. And he suffered through a 30-minute news conference with Chinese President Hu Jintao in which no questions from the media were allowed.
To date, the Obama foreign policy has consisted of efforts to appease America's enemies and to bully America's friends. Neither has worked.
In remarks reported Wednesday (11/18), Iran's foreign minister said he opposes sending uranium out of the country, effectively putting the kibosh on a deal the Obama administration thought the Iranians had agreed to.
"Iran has very publicly played President Obama for a fool, faking their way through negotiations that were a farce from the get-go," wrote the Weekly Standard's John Noonan.
Mr. Obama seems oblivious to the shambles about him. "I've restored America's standing in the world," he told CNN Wednesday.
He may be the only person on the planet who thinks so.
Jack Kelly is a former Marine and Green Beret and a former deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan administration. He is national security writer for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
http://www.post-gazette.com/search/archive.asp?cCat=373
Friday, 20 November 2009
President Obama took his massive ego and sparse historical knowledge to Asia last week. The results were so ugly even the New York Times took notice. Obama's Pacific Trip Encounters Rough Waters was its headline over a news analysis yesterday (11/19).
"Has a president ever been less successful on a trip overseas than President
Obama has on his eight day excursion to Asia," asked Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard. "I've been covering presidents since Gerald Ford and I can't think of one."
The trip began at the Asia Pacific Economic Conference (APEC) in Singapore where Mr. Obama declared himself to be America's first Pacific president, on the grounds that he was born in Hawaii, and lived for a couple of years as a child in Indonesia.
Mr. Obama either forgot or never knew that William Howard Taft had been governor-general of the Philippines before becoming president, or that Richard Nixon -- who spent more time in the Pacific in World War II than Mr. Obama spent in Indonesia -- was responsible for the opening to China.
At the APEC conference, Mr. Obama acknowledged he will be unable to obtain the international agreement on curbing so-called greenhouse gases he has sought. This is good news for the United States, but a setback for him.
From APEC Mr. Obama went to Japan, where he startled his hosts and many of his countrymen by bowing low to Emperor Akihito.
The bow, an academic expert on Japan told Jake Tapper of ABC News, was in the form of a first year English teacher trying to impress with a "Karate Kid level knowledge" of Japanese customs.
The bow as he performed it did not just display weakness in American terms, but evoked weakness in Japanese terms, Mr. Tapper's expert said. The last thing the Japanese want or need is a weak-looking American president and, again, in all ways, he unintentionally played that part.\
The most important stop on the president's itinerary was China, where things went worse for him than they had in Singapore or Japan.
"When it came to China, President Obama's famous powers of persuasion failed to persuade," wrote Barbara Demick in the Los Angeles Times. "Not only is the U.S. president coming away without definable concessions, but the Chinese appeared to be digging in their heels."
Mr. Obama had sought three things in China.
First, he wanted Chinese support for sanctions against Iran's nuclear program. Second, he wanted China to agree to curbs on fossil fuel emissions. Third, he wanted China to agree to a more realistic value for its currency. He got stiffed on all three.
The most important of these is the currency issue. China pegs the value of the renmimbi (also called the yuan) artificially low in relation to the dollar to boost sales of its exports. This essentially mercantilist policy (against which Adam Smith railed in The Wealth of Nations) makes it harder for us to sell things to the Chinese, and for our economy to recover.
What Mr. Obama received was a lecture on the danger of U.S. budget deficits, and criticism of the protectionist policies his administration has implemented.
Mr. Obama was treated with far less respect than were Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush when they visited China.
He acquiesced as the Chinese subjected him to the humiliation of a choreographed town hall meeting with student members of the Young Communist League, Mr. Barnes wrote. And he suffered through a 30-minute news conference with Chinese President Hu Jintao in which no questions from the media were allowed.
To date, the Obama foreign policy has consisted of efforts to appease America's enemies and to bully America's friends. Neither has worked.
In remarks reported Wednesday (11/18), Iran's foreign minister said he opposes sending uranium out of the country, effectively putting the kibosh on a deal the Obama administration thought the Iranians had agreed to.
"Iran has very publicly played President Obama for a fool, faking their way through negotiations that were a farce from the get-go," wrote the Weekly Standard's John Noonan.
Mr. Obama seems oblivious to the shambles about him. "I've restored America's standing in the world," he told CNN Wednesday.
He may be the only person on the planet who thinks so.
Jack Kelly is a former Marine and Green Beret and a former deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan administration. He is national security writer for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
http://www.post-gazette.com/search/archive.asp?cCat=373
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Persecution of good people by governments in history!
Sunday prayers for patriots.
Throughout history those in power seem to take an evil delight in persecuting God's good people.
"Power corrupts, and ablsoute power corrupts absolutely." (Lord Acton)
The Romans learned centuries ago that governments can't fight ideas with swords and clubs.
The only way to fight an idea is with another idea. The Romans learned this the hard way, with the loss of their entire empire.
How many people have chosen to rather die than worship false gods, like those in government, who are drunk with power and greed, and who consider themselves above the law?
How many times in the last 2000 years or so, have government agents, and rulers given people the choice of betraying their own countrymen, their religion, or their family, in exchange for their lives?
In the early days, those who were persecuted were the beneficiaries of many miracles, but in our day those miracles are not happening.
Why is that? Is it because we are really not in the right place spritually? Is it because we have made ourselves unworthy? Is it because we are praying for the wrong things?
Is it because we are using Freedom as a cloak for malice, an excuse to do evil, or at least an excuse to not do what we know we must?
“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion.” John Adams
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams
That is not to say that government should be run by churches, because the same maxim about absolute power applies. What it does say, however, is that our form of government absolutely depends on morals and ethics. Perhaps that is where America is lacking? Is there any doubt?
Look at the television and movies now. What do you see? You know the truth.
IDEAS. But what about when working with ideas is squashed by the courts, the rulers, and police?
http://www.paulstramer.com/whenisittimetofight.htm
How can we make ourselves worthy of a miraculous restoration of liberty? Perhaps by making ourselves worthy of forgiveness by God? Perhaps all of us need to do some examination of conscience. Perhaps we need to ask Him for the right things.
Is America really worthy of Freedom? Only We the People can answer that question!
Ecclesiasticus 51, 13-17
O Lord, my God, Thou hast exalted my dwelling-place upon the earth, and I have prayed for death to pass away. I called upon the Lord, the Father of my Lord, that He would not leave me in the day of my trouble, and in the time of the proud, without help. I will praise Thy name continually, and will praise it with thanksgiving, and my prayer was heard, and Thou hast saved me from destruction, and hast delivered me from the evil time. Therefore I will give thanks, and praise Thee, O Lord our God.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Throughout history those in power seem to take an evil delight in persecuting God's good people.
"Power corrupts, and ablsoute power corrupts absolutely." (Lord Acton)
The Romans learned centuries ago that governments can't fight ideas with swords and clubs.
The only way to fight an idea is with another idea. The Romans learned this the hard way, with the loss of their entire empire.
How many people have chosen to rather die than worship false gods, like those in government, who are drunk with power and greed, and who consider themselves above the law?
How many times in the last 2000 years or so, have government agents, and rulers given people the choice of betraying their own countrymen, their religion, or their family, in exchange for their lives?
In the early days, those who were persecuted were the beneficiaries of many miracles, but in our day those miracles are not happening.
Why is that? Is it because we are really not in the right place spritually? Is it because we have made ourselves unworthy? Is it because we are praying for the wrong things?
Is it because we are using Freedom as a cloak for malice, an excuse to do evil, or at least an excuse to not do what we know we must?
“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion.” John Adams
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams
That is not to say that government should be run by churches, because the same maxim about absolute power applies. What it does say, however, is that our form of government absolutely depends on morals and ethics. Perhaps that is where America is lacking? Is there any doubt?
Look at the television and movies now. What do you see? You know the truth.
IDEAS. But what about when working with ideas is squashed by the courts, the rulers, and police?
http://www.paulstramer.com/whenisittimetofight.htm
How can we make ourselves worthy of a miraculous restoration of liberty? Perhaps by making ourselves worthy of forgiveness by God? Perhaps all of us need to do some examination of conscience. Perhaps we need to ask Him for the right things.
Is America really worthy of Freedom? Only We the People can answer that question!
Ecclesiasticus 51, 13-17
O Lord, my God, Thou hast exalted my dwelling-place upon the earth, and I have prayed for death to pass away. I called upon the Lord, the Father of my Lord, that He would not leave me in the day of my trouble, and in the time of the proud, without help. I will praise Thy name continually, and will praise it with thanksgiving, and my prayer was heard, and Thou hast saved me from destruction, and hast delivered me from the evil time. Therefore I will give thanks, and praise Thee, O Lord our God.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Trial of Obama et al, still on for January ??
This post is from the attorney Orly Taiz herself on November 19th 2009
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=6255
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=6255
Obama's branding is now backfiring. LOL?
I really don't think it's very funny, but you might.
Order the bumper sticker here:
http://www.patriotdepot.com/lolbumpersticker.aspx
Order the bumper sticker here:
http://www.patriotdepot.com/lolbumpersticker.aspx
Friday, November 20, 2009
Homeland Security Launches Investigation of Dr. Manning on Obama Eligibility
This video stands on it's own without explanation!
A Phone Call To The Fed
The following is a conversation with Mr. Ron Supinski of the Public Information Department of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank. This is an account of that conversation.
CALLER - Mr. Supinski, does my country own the Federal Reserve System?
MR. SUPINSKI - We are an agency of the government.
CALLER - That's not my question. Is it owned by my country?
MR. SUPINSKI - It is an agency of the government created by congress.
CALLER - Is the Federal Reserve a Corporation?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Does my government own any of the stock in the Federal Reserve?
MR. SUPINSKI - No, it is owned by the member banks.
CALLER - Are the member banks private corporations?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Are Federal Reserve Notes backed by anything?
MR. SUPINSKI-Yes, by the assets of the Federal Reserve but, primarily by the power of congress to lay tax on the people.
CALLER - Did you say, by the power to collect taxes is what backs Federal Reserve Notes?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - What are the total assets of the Federal Reserve?
MR. SUPINSKI - The San Francisco Bank has $36 Billion in assets.
CALLER - What are these assets composed of?
MR. SUPINSKI - Gold, the Federal Reserve Bank itself and government securities.
CALLER - What value does the Federal Reserve Bank carry gold per oz. On their books?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't have that information but the San Francisco Bank has $1.6 billion in gold.
CALLER - Are you saying the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has $1.6 billion in gold, the bank itself and the balance of the assets is government securities?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes.
CALLER - Where does the Federal Reserve get Federal Reserve Notes from?
MR. SUPINSKI - They are authorized by the Treasury.
CALLER - How much does the Federal Reserve pay for a $10 Federal Reserve Note?
MR. SUPINSKI - Fifty to seventy cents.
CALLER - How much do they pay for a $100.00 Federal Reserve Note?
MR. SUPINSKI - The same fifty to seventy cents.
CALLER - To pay only fifty cents for a $100.00 is a tremendous gain, isn't it?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - According to the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve pays $20.60 per 1,000 denomination or a little over two cents for a $100.00 bill, is that correct?
MR. SUPINSKI - That is probably close.
CALLER - Doesn't the Federal Reserve use the Federal Reserve Notes that cost about two cents each to purchase US Bonds from the government?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, but there is more to it than that.
CALLER - Basically, that is what happens?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, basically you are correct.
CALLER - How many Federal Reserve Notes are in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - $263 billion and we can only account for a small percentage.
CALLER - Where did they go?
MR. SUPINSKI - Peoples mattress, buried in their back yards and illegal drug money.
CALLER - Since the debt is payable in Federal Reserve Notes, how can the $4 trillion national debt be paid-off with the total Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.
CALLER - If the Federal Government would collect every Federal Reserve Note in circulation would it be mathematically possible to pay the $4 trillion national debt?
MR. SUPINSKI - No
CALLER - Am I correct when I say, $1 deposited in a member bank $8 can be lent out through Fractional Reserve Policy?
MR. SUPINSKI - About $7.
CALLER - Correct me if I am wrong but, $7 of additional Federal Reserve Notes were never put in circulation. But, for lack of better words were "created out of thin air " in the form of credits and the two cents per denomination were not paid either. In other words, the Federal Reserve Notes were not physically printed but, in reality were created by a journal entry and lent at interest. Is that correct?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Is that the reason there are only $263 billion Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - That is part of the reason.
CALLER - Am I mistaking that when the Federal Reserve Act was passed (on Christmas Eve) in 1913, it transferred the power to coin and issue our nation's money and to regulate the value thereof from Congress to a Private corporation. And my country now borrows what should be our own money from the Federal Reserve (a private corporation) plus interest. Is that correct and the debt can never be paid off under the current money system of country?
MR. SUPINSKI - Basically, yes.
CALLER - I smell a rat, do you?
MR. SUPINSKI - I am sorry, I can't answer that, I work here.
CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been independently audited?
MR. SUPINSKI - We are audited.
CALLER - Why is there a current House Resolution 1486 calling for a complete audit of the Federal Reserve by the GAO and why is the Federal Reserve resisting?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.
CALLER - Does the Federal Reserve regulate the value of Federal Reserve Notes and interest rates?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Explain how the Federal Reserve System can be Constitutional if, only the Congress of the US, which comprises of the Senate and the House of representatives has the power to coin and issue our money supply and regulate the value thereof? [Article 1 Section 1 and Section 8] Nowhere, in the Constitution does it give Congress the power or authority to transfer any powers granted under the Constitution to a private corporation or, does it?
MR. SUPINSKI - I am not an expert on constitutional law. I can refer you to our legal department.
CALLER - I can tell you I have read the Constitution. It does NOT provide that any power granted can be transferred to a private corporation. Doesn't it specifically state, all other powers not granted are reserved to the States and to the citizens? Does that mean to a private corporation?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't think so, but we were created by Congress.
CALLER - Would you agree it is our country and it should be our money as provided by our Constitution?
MR. SUPINSKI - I understand what you are saying.
CALLER - Why should we borrow our own money from a private consortium of bankers? Isn't this why we had a revolution, created a separate sovereign nation and a Bill of Rights?
MR. SUPINSKI - (Declined to answer).
CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court?
MR. SUPINSKI - I believe there has been court cases on the matter.
CALLER - Have there been Supreme Court Cases?
MR. SUPINSKI - I think so, but I am not sure.
CALLER - Didn't the Supreme Court declare unanimously in A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. vs. US and Carter vs. Carter Coal Co. the corporative-state arrangement an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power? ["The power conferred is the power to regulate. This is legislative delegation in its most obnoxious form; for it is not even delegation to an official or an official body, presumptively disinterested, but to private persons." Carter vs. Carter Coal Co...]
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know, I can refer you to our legal department.
CALLER - Isn't the current money system a house of cards that must fall because, the debt can mathematically never be paid-off?
MR. SUPINSKI - It appears that way. I can tell you have been looking into this matter and are very knowledgeable. However, we do have a solution.
CALLER - What is the solution?
MR. SUPINSKI - The Debit Card.
CALLER - Do you mean under the EFT Act (Electronic Funds Transfer)? Isn't that very frightening, when one considers the capabilities of computers? It would provide the government and all it's agencies, including the Federal Reserve such information as: You went to the gas station @ 2:30 and bought $10.00 of unleaded gas @ $1.41 per gallon and then you went to the grocery store @ 2:58 and bought bread, lunch meat and milk for $12.32 and then went to the drug store @ 3:30 and bought cold medicine for $5.62. In other words, they would know where we go, when we went, how much we paid, how much the merchant paid and how much profit he made. Under the EFT they will literally know everything about us. Isn't that kind of scary?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, it makes you wonder.
CALLER - I smell a GIANT RAT that has overthrown my constitution. Aren't we paying tribute in the form of income taxes to a consortium of private bankers?
MR. SUPINSKI - I can't call it tribute, it is interest.
CALLER - Haven't all elected officials taken an oath of office to preserve and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic? Isn't the Federal Reserve a domestic enemy?
MR. SUPINSKI - I can't say that.
CALLER - Our elected officials and members of the Federal Reserve are guilty of aiding and abetting the overthrowing of my Constitution and that is treason. Isn't the punishment of treason death?
MR. SUPINSKI - I believe so.
CALLER - Thank you for your time and information and if I may say so, I think you should take the necessary steps to protect you and your family and withdraw your money from the banks before the collapse, I am.
MR. SUPINSKI - It doesn't look good.
CALLER - May God have mercy on the souls who are behind this unconstitutional and criminal act called the Federal Reserve. When the ALMIGHTY MASS awakens to this giant hoax, they will not take it with a grain of salt. It has been a pleasure talking to you and I thank you for your time. I hope you will take my advice before it does collapse.
MR. SUPINSKI - Unfortunately, it does not look good.
CALLER - Have a good day and thanks for your time.
MR. SUPINSKI - Thanks for calling.
If the reader has any doubts to the validity of this conversation, call your nearest Federal Reserve Bank, YOU KNOW THE QUESTIONS TO ASK! You won't find them listed under the Federal Government. They are in the white pages, along with Federal Express, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), and any other business. Find out for yourself if all this is true.
And then, go to your local law library and look up the case of Lewis vs. US, case #80-5905, 9th Circuit, June 24, 1982. It reads in part: "Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the federal reserve are NOT federal instrumentality's . . but are independent and privately owned and controlled corporations - federal reserve banks are listed neither as "wholly-owned' government corporations [under 31 USC Section 846] nor as 'mixed ownership' corporations [under 31 USC Section 856] . . . 28 USC Sections 1346(b), 2671. '
Federal agency' is defined as: the executive departments, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States, and corporations acting primarily as instrumentality's of the United States, but does not include any contractors with the United States . . . There are no sharp criteria for determining whether an entity is a federal agency within the meaning of the Act, but the critical factor is the existence of the federal government control over the 'detailed physical performance' and 'day to day operations' of that entity.
Other factors courts have considered include whether the entity is an independent corporation . . . whether the government is involved in the entity's finances, . . . and whether the mission of the entity furthers the policy of the United States . . . Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks, and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities ...
It is evident from the legislative history of the Federal Reserve Act that Congress did not intend to give the federal government direction over the daily operation of the Reserve Banks . . . The fact that the Federal Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks does not make them federal agencies under the Act . . . Unlike typical federal agencies, each bank is empowered to hire and fire employees at will. Bank employees do not participate in the Civil Service Retirement System. They are covered by worker's compensation insurance, purchased by the Bank, rather than the Federal Employees Compensation Act.
Employees traveling on Bank business are not subject to federal travel regulations and do not receive government employee discounts on lodging and services . . . Finally, the Banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own name. 12 USC Section 341. They carry their own liability insurance and typically process and handle their own claims . . ." According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, "When the Federal Reserve was created, its stock was sold to the member banks." ("The Hats The Federal Reserve Wears," published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia).
The original Stockholders of the Federal Reserve Banks in 1913 were the Rockefeller's, JP Morgan, Rothschild's, Lazard Freres, Schoellkopf, Kuhn-Loeb, Warburgs, Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs. The MONEYCHANGERS wanted to be insured they had a monopoly over our money supply, so Congress passed into law Title 12, Section 284 of the United States Code. Section 284 specifically states, "NO STOCK ALLOWED TO THE US" *
Monopoly - "A privilege or peculiar advantage vested in one or more persons or companies, consisting in the exclusive right [or power] to carry on a particular business or trade, manufacture a particular article, or control the sale of the whole supply of a particular commodity, A form of market structure in which only a few firms dominate the total sales of a product or service.
'Monopoly,' as prohibited by Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, has two elements: possession of a monopoly power in relevant market and willful acquisition or maintenance of that power, as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior power, business acumen, or historical product. A monopoly condemned by the Sherman Act is the power to fix prices, or exclude competition, coupled with policies designed to use and preserve that power." (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition) The Federal Reserve Act goes one step farther, "No Senator or Representative in Congress shall be a member of the Federal Reserve Board or an officer or director of a Federal Reserve Bank." They didn't want We The People to have any say in the operation of their monopoly through our elected officials.
---
Copyright Notice: All rights reserved re: common-law copyright of trade-name/trade-mark, DANIEL DOYLE BENHAM©-as well as any and all derivatives and variations in the spelling of said trade-name/trade-mark-Copyright© 1988 by Daniel Doyle Benham.
Record Owner: Daniel Doyle Benham, Autograph Common Law Copyright© 1988.
d.benham@worldnet.att.net
Comment to Jeff Rense
From Dave Williams
Williams.Dave@orbital.com
9-17-2
Jeff,
I would like to comment on the attached article posted to your website.
I am an avid reader of your site and think that some of the articles you have posted have some merit behind them. Others are written and posted by fear-mongers who offer no solutions to the problems they encounter. This one, however, seems to at least be taking a stand to introduce legislation to turn the tide on the greedy, robber barons of our time. But I would like to put to rest something that has been commented for a long time in various postings to your website that has had me pegged for some time and has been completely untrue. Whenever anyone talks about the Constitutional rights of Congress to coin money and regulate the value thereof, they always state that the Federal Reserve Banks (not being an actual part of the government) have not been duly authorized to perform these functions and the sole right must remain with Congress. They site the Constitution itself (Article I, Section 8, paragraph 5) as being the law of the land (which it duly is) for the legality of the Federal Reserve Banking system. For the life of me, however, it seems that they quit reading at this point, because the 18th and final paragraph of Section 8 states:
"To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof."
Now, I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but I can read plain English. This paragraph clearly shows how farsighted the Constitutional framers were in the fact that they new that the Constitution, while a great start to this republic, was not the answer for every legality to come up in the future. This paragraph clearly shows also, that the Congress had the right to legislate the power for coining money and its denominatory value to other persons or businesses that were capable of doing so by "carrying into execution the foregoing powers", i.e. - the right to coin money and its value. This final paragraph also means not just the entire Section 8, but any part of the Constitution pertaining to the making of laws vested in the power of these United States by the Constitution.
Why is it nobody ever comments on this paragraph? Could it be that they just want to sow fear and hatred in their fellow Americans for the government, all the while knowing they are wrong? Or are they just plain ignorant and believe what they want to? I for one, feel the government is doing a pretty good job of bringing a total disenchantment between them and the people of this country. Why do think almost half the voting population doesn't vote? I can tell you. They don't like who they are voting for in either party!
Again, I'll state for the record, I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but a Design Engineer and while not presuming that I know more than our duly appointed Congressional Members, I do know from where right and wrong is and where the laws currently stand on this. Which is to say once and for all, that the Federal Reserve Banking System is completely lawful!
Now, do I agree with and like the current system? NO!! But do we have to accept that it is and has been the law since its enactment? YES! Now, I'm not going to split hairs with anyone over whether or not it was duly ratified by the 2/3rds margin of each states' legislative group, but until the people of this country wake up and take back their constitutional rights', as in "We the people, by the people" we cannot expect these changes to be made on our behalf. At least the esteemed Rep Ron Paul is on the right track in trying to get the laws changed legally. Now, whether he will suceed or not will depend on the people of this country. If we remain asleep at the wheel, so to say, then we shall not. There has to be a common goal and enough backing to make this happen! Wake up America!
--------
Comment from Paul Stramer
Lincoln County Watch, Eureka Montana
The paragraph quoted in the above comment does not apply in the case of the Fed.
Here is the paragraph again.
"To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof."
The "foregoing powers" in the above do NOT include delegating authority to coin money. The constitution makes it the duty of Congress and Congress alone, to coin money and regulate it's value. There is NO mention of any power or ability to delegate away that power and duty. Therefore there is no power that can be delegated. Therefore there is no law that can be made by congress to DELEGATE it.
Remember the 10th Amendment.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
That simply says, "If we forgot anything, you can't do that either!" It also says, If we didn't write it in this Constitution, it belongs to the States or people. Nowhere in the Constitution is it written that the Congress can give away or delegate it's power to "coin money and regulate the value thereof", Therefore the
Federal Reserve act was and is unconstitutional on the face of it.
There are only 17 delegated powers, including the power to "coin money and regulate the value thereof". There is NO delegated power to the United States government by the Constitution that authorizes assigning a delegated power of Congress to some other body, be it public or private. The framers wanted the Congress to be on the hook, so to speak, for the money they created. They wanted the blame or credit for managing the money supply to belong squarley on the shoulders of Congress, not some privately owned secretive banker or group of money changers. They had just left a system where that was the case.
They were right. Look what it has gotten us too. They must be rolling in their graves.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
CALLER - Mr. Supinski, does my country own the Federal Reserve System?
MR. SUPINSKI - We are an agency of the government.
CALLER - That's not my question. Is it owned by my country?
MR. SUPINSKI - It is an agency of the government created by congress.
CALLER - Is the Federal Reserve a Corporation?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Does my government own any of the stock in the Federal Reserve?
MR. SUPINSKI - No, it is owned by the member banks.
CALLER - Are the member banks private corporations?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Are Federal Reserve Notes backed by anything?
MR. SUPINSKI-Yes, by the assets of the Federal Reserve but, primarily by the power of congress to lay tax on the people.
CALLER - Did you say, by the power to collect taxes is what backs Federal Reserve Notes?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - What are the total assets of the Federal Reserve?
MR. SUPINSKI - The San Francisco Bank has $36 Billion in assets.
CALLER - What are these assets composed of?
MR. SUPINSKI - Gold, the Federal Reserve Bank itself and government securities.
CALLER - What value does the Federal Reserve Bank carry gold per oz. On their books?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't have that information but the San Francisco Bank has $1.6 billion in gold.
CALLER - Are you saying the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has $1.6 billion in gold, the bank itself and the balance of the assets is government securities?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes.
CALLER - Where does the Federal Reserve get Federal Reserve Notes from?
MR. SUPINSKI - They are authorized by the Treasury.
CALLER - How much does the Federal Reserve pay for a $10 Federal Reserve Note?
MR. SUPINSKI - Fifty to seventy cents.
CALLER - How much do they pay for a $100.00 Federal Reserve Note?
MR. SUPINSKI - The same fifty to seventy cents.
CALLER - To pay only fifty cents for a $100.00 is a tremendous gain, isn't it?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - According to the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve pays $20.60 per 1,000 denomination or a little over two cents for a $100.00 bill, is that correct?
MR. SUPINSKI - That is probably close.
CALLER - Doesn't the Federal Reserve use the Federal Reserve Notes that cost about two cents each to purchase US Bonds from the government?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, but there is more to it than that.
CALLER - Basically, that is what happens?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, basically you are correct.
CALLER - How many Federal Reserve Notes are in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - $263 billion and we can only account for a small percentage.
CALLER - Where did they go?
MR. SUPINSKI - Peoples mattress, buried in their back yards and illegal drug money.
CALLER - Since the debt is payable in Federal Reserve Notes, how can the $4 trillion national debt be paid-off with the total Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.
CALLER - If the Federal Government would collect every Federal Reserve Note in circulation would it be mathematically possible to pay the $4 trillion national debt?
MR. SUPINSKI - No
CALLER - Am I correct when I say, $1 deposited in a member bank $8 can be lent out through Fractional Reserve Policy?
MR. SUPINSKI - About $7.
CALLER - Correct me if I am wrong but, $7 of additional Federal Reserve Notes were never put in circulation. But, for lack of better words were "created out of thin air " in the form of credits and the two cents per denomination were not paid either. In other words, the Federal Reserve Notes were not physically printed but, in reality were created by a journal entry and lent at interest. Is that correct?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Is that the reason there are only $263 billion Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - That is part of the reason.
CALLER - Am I mistaking that when the Federal Reserve Act was passed (on Christmas Eve) in 1913, it transferred the power to coin and issue our nation's money and to regulate the value thereof from Congress to a Private corporation. And my country now borrows what should be our own money from the Federal Reserve (a private corporation) plus interest. Is that correct and the debt can never be paid off under the current money system of country?
MR. SUPINSKI - Basically, yes.
CALLER - I smell a rat, do you?
MR. SUPINSKI - I am sorry, I can't answer that, I work here.
CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been independently audited?
MR. SUPINSKI - We are audited.
CALLER - Why is there a current House Resolution 1486 calling for a complete audit of the Federal Reserve by the GAO and why is the Federal Reserve resisting?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.
CALLER - Does the Federal Reserve regulate the value of Federal Reserve Notes and interest rates?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Explain how the Federal Reserve System can be Constitutional if, only the Congress of the US, which comprises of the Senate and the House of representatives has the power to coin and issue our money supply and regulate the value thereof? [Article 1 Section 1 and Section 8] Nowhere, in the Constitution does it give Congress the power or authority to transfer any powers granted under the Constitution to a private corporation or, does it?
MR. SUPINSKI - I am not an expert on constitutional law. I can refer you to our legal department.
CALLER - I can tell you I have read the Constitution. It does NOT provide that any power granted can be transferred to a private corporation. Doesn't it specifically state, all other powers not granted are reserved to the States and to the citizens? Does that mean to a private corporation?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't think so, but we were created by Congress.
CALLER - Would you agree it is our country and it should be our money as provided by our Constitution?
MR. SUPINSKI - I understand what you are saying.
CALLER - Why should we borrow our own money from a private consortium of bankers? Isn't this why we had a revolution, created a separate sovereign nation and a Bill of Rights?
MR. SUPINSKI - (Declined to answer).
CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court?
MR. SUPINSKI - I believe there has been court cases on the matter.
CALLER - Have there been Supreme Court Cases?
MR. SUPINSKI - I think so, but I am not sure.
CALLER - Didn't the Supreme Court declare unanimously in A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. vs. US and Carter vs. Carter Coal Co. the corporative-state arrangement an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power? ["The power conferred is the power to regulate. This is legislative delegation in its most obnoxious form; for it is not even delegation to an official or an official body, presumptively disinterested, but to private persons." Carter vs. Carter Coal Co...]
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know, I can refer you to our legal department.
CALLER - Isn't the current money system a house of cards that must fall because, the debt can mathematically never be paid-off?
MR. SUPINSKI - It appears that way. I can tell you have been looking into this matter and are very knowledgeable. However, we do have a solution.
CALLER - What is the solution?
MR. SUPINSKI - The Debit Card.
CALLER - Do you mean under the EFT Act (Electronic Funds Transfer)? Isn't that very frightening, when one considers the capabilities of computers? It would provide the government and all it's agencies, including the Federal Reserve such information as: You went to the gas station @ 2:30 and bought $10.00 of unleaded gas @ $1.41 per gallon and then you went to the grocery store @ 2:58 and bought bread, lunch meat and milk for $12.32 and then went to the drug store @ 3:30 and bought cold medicine for $5.62. In other words, they would know where we go, when we went, how much we paid, how much the merchant paid and how much profit he made. Under the EFT they will literally know everything about us. Isn't that kind of scary?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, it makes you wonder.
CALLER - I smell a GIANT RAT that has overthrown my constitution. Aren't we paying tribute in the form of income taxes to a consortium of private bankers?
MR. SUPINSKI - I can't call it tribute, it is interest.
CALLER - Haven't all elected officials taken an oath of office to preserve and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic? Isn't the Federal Reserve a domestic enemy?
MR. SUPINSKI - I can't say that.
CALLER - Our elected officials and members of the Federal Reserve are guilty of aiding and abetting the overthrowing of my Constitution and that is treason. Isn't the punishment of treason death?
MR. SUPINSKI - I believe so.
CALLER - Thank you for your time and information and if I may say so, I think you should take the necessary steps to protect you and your family and withdraw your money from the banks before the collapse, I am.
MR. SUPINSKI - It doesn't look good.
CALLER - May God have mercy on the souls who are behind this unconstitutional and criminal act called the Federal Reserve. When the ALMIGHTY MASS awakens to this giant hoax, they will not take it with a grain of salt. It has been a pleasure talking to you and I thank you for your time. I hope you will take my advice before it does collapse.
MR. SUPINSKI - Unfortunately, it does not look good.
CALLER - Have a good day and thanks for your time.
MR. SUPINSKI - Thanks for calling.
If the reader has any doubts to the validity of this conversation, call your nearest Federal Reserve Bank, YOU KNOW THE QUESTIONS TO ASK! You won't find them listed under the Federal Government. They are in the white pages, along with Federal Express, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), and any other business. Find out for yourself if all this is true.
And then, go to your local law library and look up the case of Lewis vs. US, case #80-5905, 9th Circuit, June 24, 1982. It reads in part: "Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the federal reserve are NOT federal instrumentality's . . but are independent and privately owned and controlled corporations - federal reserve banks are listed neither as "wholly-owned' government corporations [under 31 USC Section 846] nor as 'mixed ownership' corporations [under 31 USC Section 856] . . . 28 USC Sections 1346(b), 2671. '
Federal agency' is defined as: the executive departments, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States, and corporations acting primarily as instrumentality's of the United States, but does not include any contractors with the United States . . . There are no sharp criteria for determining whether an entity is a federal agency within the meaning of the Act, but the critical factor is the existence of the federal government control over the 'detailed physical performance' and 'day to day operations' of that entity.
Other factors courts have considered include whether the entity is an independent corporation . . . whether the government is involved in the entity's finances, . . . and whether the mission of the entity furthers the policy of the United States . . . Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks, and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities ...
It is evident from the legislative history of the Federal Reserve Act that Congress did not intend to give the federal government direction over the daily operation of the Reserve Banks . . . The fact that the Federal Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks does not make them federal agencies under the Act . . . Unlike typical federal agencies, each bank is empowered to hire and fire employees at will. Bank employees do not participate in the Civil Service Retirement System. They are covered by worker's compensation insurance, purchased by the Bank, rather than the Federal Employees Compensation Act.
Employees traveling on Bank business are not subject to federal travel regulations and do not receive government employee discounts on lodging and services . . . Finally, the Banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own name. 12 USC Section 341. They carry their own liability insurance and typically process and handle their own claims . . ." According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, "When the Federal Reserve was created, its stock was sold to the member banks." ("The Hats The Federal Reserve Wears," published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia).
The original Stockholders of the Federal Reserve Banks in 1913 were the Rockefeller's, JP Morgan, Rothschild's, Lazard Freres, Schoellkopf, Kuhn-Loeb, Warburgs, Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs. The MONEYCHANGERS wanted to be insured they had a monopoly over our money supply, so Congress passed into law Title 12, Section 284 of the United States Code. Section 284 specifically states, "NO STOCK ALLOWED TO THE US" *
Monopoly - "A privilege or peculiar advantage vested in one or more persons or companies, consisting in the exclusive right [or power] to carry on a particular business or trade, manufacture a particular article, or control the sale of the whole supply of a particular commodity, A form of market structure in which only a few firms dominate the total sales of a product or service.
'Monopoly,' as prohibited by Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, has two elements: possession of a monopoly power in relevant market and willful acquisition or maintenance of that power, as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior power, business acumen, or historical product. A monopoly condemned by the Sherman Act is the power to fix prices, or exclude competition, coupled with policies designed to use and preserve that power." (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition) The Federal Reserve Act goes one step farther, "No Senator or Representative in Congress shall be a member of the Federal Reserve Board or an officer or director of a Federal Reserve Bank." They didn't want We The People to have any say in the operation of their monopoly through our elected officials.
---
Copyright Notice: All rights reserved re: common-law copyright of trade-name/trade-mark, DANIEL DOYLE BENHAM©-as well as any and all derivatives and variations in the spelling of said trade-name/trade-mark-Copyright© 1988 by Daniel Doyle Benham.
Record Owner: Daniel Doyle Benham, Autograph Common Law Copyright© 1988.
d.benham@worldnet.att.net
Comment to Jeff Rense
From Dave Williams
Williams.Dave@orbital.com
9-17-2
Jeff,
I would like to comment on the attached article posted to your website.
I am an avid reader of your site and think that some of the articles you have posted have some merit behind them. Others are written and posted by fear-mongers who offer no solutions to the problems they encounter. This one, however, seems to at least be taking a stand to introduce legislation to turn the tide on the greedy, robber barons of our time. But I would like to put to rest something that has been commented for a long time in various postings to your website that has had me pegged for some time and has been completely untrue. Whenever anyone talks about the Constitutional rights of Congress to coin money and regulate the value thereof, they always state that the Federal Reserve Banks (not being an actual part of the government) have not been duly authorized to perform these functions and the sole right must remain with Congress. They site the Constitution itself (Article I, Section 8, paragraph 5) as being the law of the land (which it duly is) for the legality of the Federal Reserve Banking system. For the life of me, however, it seems that they quit reading at this point, because the 18th and final paragraph of Section 8 states:
"To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof."
Now, I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but I can read plain English. This paragraph clearly shows how farsighted the Constitutional framers were in the fact that they new that the Constitution, while a great start to this republic, was not the answer for every legality to come up in the future. This paragraph clearly shows also, that the Congress had the right to legislate the power for coining money and its denominatory value to other persons or businesses that were capable of doing so by "carrying into execution the foregoing powers", i.e. - the right to coin money and its value. This final paragraph also means not just the entire Section 8, but any part of the Constitution pertaining to the making of laws vested in the power of these United States by the Constitution.
Why is it nobody ever comments on this paragraph? Could it be that they just want to sow fear and hatred in their fellow Americans for the government, all the while knowing they are wrong? Or are they just plain ignorant and believe what they want to? I for one, feel the government is doing a pretty good job of bringing a total disenchantment between them and the people of this country. Why do think almost half the voting population doesn't vote? I can tell you. They don't like who they are voting for in either party!
Again, I'll state for the record, I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but a Design Engineer and while not presuming that I know more than our duly appointed Congressional Members, I do know from where right and wrong is and where the laws currently stand on this. Which is to say once and for all, that the Federal Reserve Banking System is completely lawful!
Now, do I agree with and like the current system? NO!! But do we have to accept that it is and has been the law since its enactment? YES! Now, I'm not going to split hairs with anyone over whether or not it was duly ratified by the 2/3rds margin of each states' legislative group, but until the people of this country wake up and take back their constitutional rights', as in "We the people, by the people" we cannot expect these changes to be made on our behalf. At least the esteemed Rep Ron Paul is on the right track in trying to get the laws changed legally. Now, whether he will suceed or not will depend on the people of this country. If we remain asleep at the wheel, so to say, then we shall not. There has to be a common goal and enough backing to make this happen! Wake up America!
--------
Comment from Paul Stramer
Lincoln County Watch, Eureka Montana
The paragraph quoted in the above comment does not apply in the case of the Fed.
Here is the paragraph again.
"To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof."
The "foregoing powers" in the above do NOT include delegating authority to coin money. The constitution makes it the duty of Congress and Congress alone, to coin money and regulate it's value. There is NO mention of any power or ability to delegate away that power and duty. Therefore there is no power that can be delegated. Therefore there is no law that can be made by congress to DELEGATE it.
Remember the 10th Amendment.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
That simply says, "If we forgot anything, you can't do that either!" It also says, If we didn't write it in this Constitution, it belongs to the States or people. Nowhere in the Constitution is it written that the Congress can give away or delegate it's power to "coin money and regulate the value thereof", Therefore the
Federal Reserve act was and is unconstitutional on the face of it.
There are only 17 delegated powers, including the power to "coin money and regulate the value thereof". There is NO delegated power to the United States government by the Constitution that authorizes assigning a delegated power of Congress to some other body, be it public or private. The framers wanted the Congress to be on the hook, so to speak, for the money they created. They wanted the blame or credit for managing the money supply to belong squarley on the shoulders of Congress, not some privately owned secretive banker or group of money changers. They had just left a system where that was the case.
They were right. Look what it has gotten us too. They must be rolling in their graves.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Incoming Fire Has the Right of Way
Incoming Fire Has the Right of Way
Clint Smith, Director of Thunder Ranch, is part Drill Instructor, and part stand up comic. Here are a few of his observations on tactics, firearms, self defense and life as we know it in the civilized world.
"The handgun would not be my choice of weapon if I knew I was going to a fight....I'd choose a rifle, a shotgun, an RPG or an atomic bomb instead."
"The two most important rules in a gunfight are: Always cheat and Always win."
"Every time I teach a class, I discover I don't know something."
"Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."
"Make your attacker advance through a wall of bullets. I may get killed with my own gun, but he's gonna have to beat me to death with it, cause it's going to be empty."
"If you're not shootin', you should be loadin'. If you're not loadin, you should be movin', if you're not movin', someone's gonna cut your head off and put it on a stick."
"When you reload in low light encounters, don't put your flashlight in your back pocket... If you light yourself up, you'll look like an angel or the tooth fairy...and you're gonna be one of 'em pretty soon."
"Do something. It may be wrong, but do something."
"Nothing adds a little class to a sniper course like a babe in a Ghilliesuit."
"Shoot what's available, as long as it's available, until something else becomes available."
"If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. That's ridiculous.. If I have a gun, what in the hell do I have to be paranoid for."
"Don't shoot fast, shoot good."
"You can say 'stop' or 'alto' or use any other word you think will work but I've found that a large bore muzzle pointed at someone's head is pretty much the universal language."
"You have the rest of your life to solve your problems. How long you live depends on how well you do it."
"You cannot save the planet. You may be able to save yourself and your family."
"Thunder Ranch will be here as long as you'll have us or until someone makes us go away and either way it will be exciting."
More Excellent Gun Wisdom.......The purpose of fighting is to Win!
There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either.
The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.
Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.
If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
I carry a gun cause a cop is too heavy.
When seconds count, the cops are just minutes away.
A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him 'Why do you carry a 45?' The Ranger responded, 'Because they don't make a 46.'
An armed man will kill an unarmed man with monotonous regularity.
The old sheriff was attending an awards dinner when a lady commented on his wearing his sidearm. 'Sheriff, I see you have your pistol. Are you expecting trouble?' 'N o ma'am. If I were expecting trouble, I would have brought my rifle.'
Beware the man who only has one gun. He probably knows how to use it!
'The true Soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because He loves what is behind him.' - G. K. Chesterton
A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.
'Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not.' ~ Thomas Jefferson
"A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy." -- Samuel Adams
If you believe in the 2nd Amendment, please forward. I just did.
"How fortunate for governments that the people they govern don't think." -- Adolph Hitler
Clint Smith, Director of Thunder Ranch, is part Drill Instructor, and part stand up comic. Here are a few of his observations on tactics, firearms, self defense and life as we know it in the civilized world.
"The handgun would not be my choice of weapon if I knew I was going to a fight....I'd choose a rifle, a shotgun, an RPG or an atomic bomb instead."
"The two most important rules in a gunfight are: Always cheat and Always win."
"Every time I teach a class, I discover I don't know something."
"Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."
"Make your attacker advance through a wall of bullets. I may get killed with my own gun, but he's gonna have to beat me to death with it, cause it's going to be empty."
"If you're not shootin', you should be loadin'. If you're not loadin, you should be movin', if you're not movin', someone's gonna cut your head off and put it on a stick."
"When you reload in low light encounters, don't put your flashlight in your back pocket... If you light yourself up, you'll look like an angel or the tooth fairy...and you're gonna be one of 'em pretty soon."
"Do something. It may be wrong, but do something."
"Nothing adds a little class to a sniper course like a babe in a Ghilliesuit."
"Shoot what's available, as long as it's available, until something else becomes available."
"If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. That's ridiculous.. If I have a gun, what in the hell do I have to be paranoid for."
"Don't shoot fast, shoot good."
"You can say 'stop' or 'alto' or use any other word you think will work but I've found that a large bore muzzle pointed at someone's head is pretty much the universal language."
"You have the rest of your life to solve your problems. How long you live depends on how well you do it."
"You cannot save the planet. You may be able to save yourself and your family."
"Thunder Ranch will be here as long as you'll have us or until someone makes us go away and either way it will be exciting."
More Excellent Gun Wisdom.......The purpose of fighting is to Win!
There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either.
The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.
Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.
If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
I carry a gun cause a cop is too heavy.
When seconds count, the cops are just minutes away.
A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him 'Why do you carry a 45?' The Ranger responded, 'Because they don't make a 46.'
An armed man will kill an unarmed man with monotonous regularity.
The old sheriff was attending an awards dinner when a lady commented on his wearing his sidearm. 'Sheriff, I see you have your pistol. Are you expecting trouble?' 'N o ma'am. If I were expecting trouble, I would have brought my rifle.'
Beware the man who only has one gun. He probably knows how to use it!
'The true Soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because He loves what is behind him.' - G. K. Chesterton
A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.
'Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not.' ~ Thomas Jefferson
"A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy." -- Samuel Adams
If you believe in the 2nd Amendment, please forward. I just did.
"How fortunate for governments that the people they govern don't think." -- Adolph Hitler
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Topic: Wolves in Sheep's Clothing at Continental Congress
Christian-Edward here with PyraBang Media:
Two things to report: Virgin Broadcast: PyraRadio! http://pyraradio.com/
UPDATE: account ronpaulchat.net (mine) was suspended! Then they get in the last words trashing me. IMO anyone on that thread who was negative towards me is one of the elite guard dogs. -> We know you don't attack the messenger. I was just submitting my objective report however I did ask questions from my personal experiences as a freeman.
Sometimes hardship creates a solution however! It's TIME for unfiltered media to go LIVE and interactive! Virgin Broadcast NOW!: PyraRadio! http://pyraradio.com/
1) There are hidden elite at the continental congress.
2) Freeman-on-the-land is for real.
I was covering the event for the independent press. I was getting great footage and many of the delegates were thoughtful and also said I asked very good questions.
So I'm standing in the bar area having a beer with a few delagates and from my experience with the freeman process I brought up the fact that since the delegates were chosen by paper ballot and the voters were UNREGISTERED - they had actually elected a de-jure government that had clear lawful authority OVER the de-facto "government" that claims to have authority and carries the guns.
Read the entire article on Pyrabang here:
http://www.pyrabang.com/forum.php?topic_pick=Wolves+in+Sheep%27s+Clothing+at+Continental+Congress
READY TO DEFEND: Oath Keepers speak out at inaugural conference
Group appeals to current, former police, military members to uphold Constitution.
No amount of controversy will keep Oath Keepers from educating people about what it means to support and defend the Constitution.
That was the message Saturday during the kickoff of the group's inaugural national conference, a two-day event that comes at a time when Oath Keepers is experiencing a surge in membership and notoriety.
Appearing on the MSNBC show "Hardball," Rhodes was questioned by host Chris Matthews about his "vigilante group" and on his "strange view of the world."
Matthews talked about a recent Southern Poverty Law Center report that identified Oath Keepers as a "particularly worrisome example of the Patriot revival," a movement the law center said could carry out acts of anti-government and racist violence.
Lou Dobbs of CNN had a different opinion of Oath Keepers. On his radio show, Dobbs praised Rhodes for efforts that should bring "solace and comfort" to everyone.
Both Dobbs and Rhodes accused the Southern Poverty Law Center of perpetuating the same kind of intolerance it claims to condemn.
Read the entire article at:
http://www.lvrj.com/news/oath-keepers-speak-out-at-inaugural-conference-65931467.html
No amount of controversy will keep Oath Keepers from educating people about what it means to support and defend the Constitution.
That was the message Saturday during the kickoff of the group's inaugural national conference, a two-day event that comes at a time when Oath Keepers is experiencing a surge in membership and notoriety.
Appearing on the MSNBC show "Hardball," Rhodes was questioned by host Chris Matthews about his "vigilante group" and on his "strange view of the world."
Matthews talked about a recent Southern Poverty Law Center report that identified Oath Keepers as a "particularly worrisome example of the Patriot revival," a movement the law center said could carry out acts of anti-government and racist violence.
Lou Dobbs of CNN had a different opinion of Oath Keepers. On his radio show, Dobbs praised Rhodes for efforts that should bring "solace and comfort" to everyone.
Both Dobbs and Rhodes accused the Southern Poverty Law Center of perpetuating the same kind of intolerance it claims to condemn.
Read the entire article at:
http://www.lvrj.com/news/oath-keepers-speak-out-at-inaugural-conference-65931467.html
NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY OR TREASON!
The US Government Hijacked the Grand Jury Process years ago UNLAWFULLY.
Shocking Revelations from the Rosenberg Grand Jury Files.
Shows the history of the Grand Jury and how the government has turned it from an institution to protect people into a rubber stamp. Here's a teaser from the article:
"Lost in the discussion of the transcripts has been their astounding revelations regarding the grand jury process itself. How could it take 50 years to reveal these government lies? How could the government conceal for half a century evidence that material testimony in one of the most closely watched trials of the twentieth century was perjured? The grand jury revelations highlight the fact that the grand jury process in the United States – especially at the federal level – has been hijacked by the government."
Read this absolutely shocking article at the Lew Rockwell website.
This is how they did it to us folks. Remember I have been saying the the biggest part of the problem lies in the Judicial system.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/roots3.1.1.html
Dr. Roger Roots, J.D., Ph.D. is an assistant professor of Sociology and Criminal Justice at the New York Institute of Technology. Copyright © 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Shocking Revelations from the Rosenberg Grand Jury Files.
Shows the history of the Grand Jury and how the government has turned it from an institution to protect people into a rubber stamp. Here's a teaser from the article:
"Lost in the discussion of the transcripts has been their astounding revelations regarding the grand jury process itself. How could it take 50 years to reveal these government lies? How could the government conceal for half a century evidence that material testimony in one of the most closely watched trials of the twentieth century was perjured? The grand jury revelations highlight the fact that the grand jury process in the United States – especially at the federal level – has been hijacked by the government."
Read this absolutely shocking article at the Lew Rockwell website.
This is how they did it to us folks. Remember I have been saying the the biggest part of the problem lies in the Judicial system.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/roots3.1.1.html
Dr. Roger Roots, J.D., Ph.D. is an assistant professor of Sociology and Criminal Justice at the New York Institute of Technology. Copyright © 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
BE IT KNOWN TO YOU, O KING (Obama?)
By Timothy N. Baldwin, JD.
November 18, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
"You slave-lovers can try to justify this (illegitimate) federal government’s “right” and “authority” to enter into such agreements (as well as all of the other myriad of unconstitutional actions forced upon us) with other nations all you want. I, along with millions of other Americans, will never accept your barbaric, brute-beast concepts of politics, where your conclusions of government power and citizen submission equate to a king-peasant relationship or worse. You can postulate all you want about the constitutionality or legality of any treaty made by the president as being the supreme law of the land. You can cite U.S. Supreme Court cases, legal articles, law professors, and politicians all you want. Go on: knock yourselves out."
Read this very stunning article by Chuck Baldwin's son Timothy here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Timothy/baldwin101.htm
November 18, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
"You slave-lovers can try to justify this (illegitimate) federal government’s “right” and “authority” to enter into such agreements (as well as all of the other myriad of unconstitutional actions forced upon us) with other nations all you want. I, along with millions of other Americans, will never accept your barbaric, brute-beast concepts of politics, where your conclusions of government power and citizen submission equate to a king-peasant relationship or worse. You can postulate all you want about the constitutionality or legality of any treaty made by the president as being the supreme law of the land. You can cite U.S. Supreme Court cases, legal articles, law professors, and politicians all you want. Go on: knock yourselves out."
Read this very stunning article by Chuck Baldwin's son Timothy here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Timothy/baldwin101.htm
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Obama, Fall of The Republic! HQ full length version.
The new DVD "Obama, Fall of The Republic" is now on Youtube in it's full High Quality version and full length so it can be watched without interruption.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU&feature=PlayList&p=EF1A9396089AAD22&index=0
Everyone needs to watch this extremely important video to understand who is pulling the strings on Obama, and how this is being done to us. When he gets done, if you let him, we will have a totally communist country, and Obama thinks he is going to be the first DICTATOR OF THE WORLD!
I've got news for him. In any takeover by communists, those officials who have helped sell their own country down the drain are the first to get a bullet in the head from their own bosses, because the bosses know their puppets can't be trusted, if they were willing to turn on their own countrymen. If you don't believe it just go to Google.com and type in Communist Purges in the search box, and study the history of communist takeovers in the last 70 years.
I wouldn't give you a plug nickel for Obama's life right now, and it's not in danger from the patriot community, but from his own handlers. He is going too fast even for them, and waking up a lot of people.
Even though they know they are in the end game, total world takeover has never been attempted before.
They are on very thin ice, and they know it, and Obama is like a bull in a China closet with his openly Marxist actions. He is breaking the glass every day, with cabinet members falling like flies.
Please know that the rule of law is catching up with this totalitarian regime and they know it. You will see people go stark raving mad right in front of your eyes before this is over.
Publish this video everywhere, world wide. Especially make sure your close neighbors watch it.
Sincerely yours in law and order and the rule of law,
Paul Stramer
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU&feature=PlayList&p=EF1A9396089AAD22&index=0
Everyone needs to watch this extremely important video to understand who is pulling the strings on Obama, and how this is being done to us. When he gets done, if you let him, we will have a totally communist country, and Obama thinks he is going to be the first DICTATOR OF THE WORLD!
I've got news for him. In any takeover by communists, those officials who have helped sell their own country down the drain are the first to get a bullet in the head from their own bosses, because the bosses know their puppets can't be trusted, if they were willing to turn on their own countrymen. If you don't believe it just go to Google.com and type in Communist Purges in the search box, and study the history of communist takeovers in the last 70 years.
I wouldn't give you a plug nickel for Obama's life right now, and it's not in danger from the patriot community, but from his own handlers. He is going too fast even for them, and waking up a lot of people.
Even though they know they are in the end game, total world takeover has never been attempted before.
They are on very thin ice, and they know it, and Obama is like a bull in a China closet with his openly Marxist actions. He is breaking the glass every day, with cabinet members falling like flies.
Please know that the rule of law is catching up with this totalitarian regime and they know it. You will see people go stark raving mad right in front of your eyes before this is over.
Publish this video everywhere, world wide. Especially make sure your close neighbors watch it.
Sincerely yours in law and order and the rule of law,
Paul Stramer
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Is there any Justice in Lincoln and Ravalli counties in Montana?
Do you expect to find any justice in the court system in these counties?
You might want to read the following pages and make up your own mind.
This is a first hand account by the person who seems to be getting the brunt of serious persecution and threats against her life, without any help from the so called "justice system" in those counties.
These are not idle ramblings. I have seen the proof she is talking about. I have been notified several times after each of these incidents had happened, mostly because my name was also mentioned in some of these threats. Just read the pages and make up your own mind.
More at the following links:
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/caution-cussing-and-well-foul-language.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/judge-robin-clute-gave-sean-boushie.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/can-you-get-protective-order-to-stop.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/in-my-opinion-judge-robin-clute-has.html
Paul Stramer is NOT the author of the above articles!
I know of several JP court justices that seem to think an order of protection is the remedy for absolutely everything. They slam the gavel and issue an order that makes the responder look guilty of all kinds of crimes on just the sayso of the complainant without ever requiring the person complaining to provide any evidence, photos, afidavits, witnesses, or any proof whatsoever, and all this without benefit of any jury of their peers. These JP judges deny the respondent the ability to call any witnesses for the defense, or have any character witnesses in the courtroom. They "convict" the respondent on the spot of whatever they have been accused of by their own judgement alone. Then the sheriff will use that unsubstantiated order like they would use a conviction, to build a case for other and maybe unrelated charges, all trumped up to smear and defame their own political opponents, and destroy the lives of the accused, and now "convicted" by only a Judge's sayso.
This happens daily in Montana and all over the nation. There is no protection for the accused in this scenario whatsoever. What happened to "Innocent until proven guilty beyond a doubt"? The JP courts are not a court of record, so it's easy for the JP judges to simply deny any wrongdoing. And trying to get that order reviewed by a state district court is very expensive and time consuming, so much so that the respondent won't be able to do it. The JP judges know that. They count on it. They abuse their power and use it as a weapon to destroy their political opposition.
This is exactly the kind of abuse of power that the Grand Jury is designed to protect We the People from.
For a great and timely history of the power and use of the Grand Jury read this background:
http://americangrandjury.org/history_power.html
As I have said many times before, I will exhaust every lawful means of getting government back under the control of We the People. There is much corruption in government, especially in the Judiciary.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/09/when-is-it-time-to-fight.html
We the People can and must use every lawful means to eliminate this corruption if our children are to live in a free county and country, rather than a marxist democracy mob rule of men, making the rules as they go. Democracies never have worked for freedom anywhere throughout history. A Democracy will always lead to an Oligarchy (rule of the few) and loss of freedom. In short a Democracy is MOB RULE, and that is what we seem to have in American today especially in the judiciary. Over 2/3 of the people don't want health care. That is an undisputed fact even by the major media. In fact they don't talk about it. Where is the mechanism to bring the people who are shoving it down the American peoples throats to justice? Where is the remedy in justice for the little guy? It's in the Grand Jury and the petit (trial) jury.
"In addition to its traditional role of screening criminal cases for prosecution, common law grand juries had the power to exclude prosecutors from their presence at any time and to investigate public officials without governmental influence. These fundamental powers allowed grand juries to serve a vital function of oversight upon the government. The function of a grand jury to ferret out government corruption was the primary purpose of the grand jury system in ages past." Roger Roots, J.D.
If it's not a runaway, it's not a Real Grand Jury:
http://www.constitution.org/lrev/roots/runaway.htm
You have the right as a trial juror to judge of the law as well as the facts in any case you are on.
You already have that right. You don't have to lobby for it. You don't have to get any new laws passed.
You don't have to change the Constitution. You just have to understand and exercise your rights. You have to take command in the jury room, and educate your fellow jurors. You have to enforce the Constitution and nullify bad laws in the jury room. You have to uphold the God given "unalienable" natural laws expressed and protected by the Constitution in the jury room. It's your power, unless you give it away to the judge when he tells you that you don't have it. That is right. The judges abuse their power by saying you must take the law "the way I give it to you" in effect saying you are too stupid to understand it. This arrogance needs to be stopped and soon. In fact the most famous Judge to make this mistake was a signer of the Declaration of Independence, Samuel Chase. In the US v. Callender case attempted to rule that a jury could not decide the Constututionality of a law. It may have been partially by the following statement that he averted impeachment.
SAMUEL CHASE (Justice, U. S. Supreme Court and signer of the Declaration of Independence; in 1804): "The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts."
See your jury rights here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_state_language_on_jury_nullification.pdf
Read the Jury rights handbook here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_Jurors_Handbook.pdf
Some people would like you to believe that the ordinary citizen is incapable of understanding these issues. Some would like you to believe you are too dumb to read these laws and make sense of them. They want your mind in a box of their own creation. You need to think outside their box, like the founders did.
You need to understand and exercise your rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. If you don't you will lose those God given and Constitutionally protected rights forever, for yourself and your posterity.
I choose to fight with the law first. We shall see later how unlawful and corrupt these "rule of men" people really are. I say again. those who oppose this lawful idea of reviving the standing Grand Jury should be the first to be investigated. Without accusing them of anything, I would bet that many get a paycheck from some branch of government.
It seems that leftists don't want you to know these history lessons. It seems they don't want you to exercise your true power to stop corruption. So now it's up to you. You no longer can say "But what can we do about it?"
Paul Stramer
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
You might want to read the following pages and make up your own mind.
This is a first hand account by the person who seems to be getting the brunt of serious persecution and threats against her life, without any help from the so called "justice system" in those counties.
These are not idle ramblings. I have seen the proof she is talking about. I have been notified several times after each of these incidents had happened, mostly because my name was also mentioned in some of these threats. Just read the pages and make up your own mind.
More at the following links:
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/caution-cussing-and-well-foul-language.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/judge-robin-clute-gave-sean-boushie.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/can-you-get-protective-order-to-stop.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/in-my-opinion-judge-robin-clute-has.html
Paul Stramer is NOT the author of the above articles!
I know of several JP court justices that seem to think an order of protection is the remedy for absolutely everything. They slam the gavel and issue an order that makes the responder look guilty of all kinds of crimes on just the sayso of the complainant without ever requiring the person complaining to provide any evidence, photos, afidavits, witnesses, or any proof whatsoever, and all this without benefit of any jury of their peers. These JP judges deny the respondent the ability to call any witnesses for the defense, or have any character witnesses in the courtroom. They "convict" the respondent on the spot of whatever they have been accused of by their own judgement alone. Then the sheriff will use that unsubstantiated order like they would use a conviction, to build a case for other and maybe unrelated charges, all trumped up to smear and defame their own political opponents, and destroy the lives of the accused, and now "convicted" by only a Judge's sayso.
This happens daily in Montana and all over the nation. There is no protection for the accused in this scenario whatsoever. What happened to "Innocent until proven guilty beyond a doubt"? The JP courts are not a court of record, so it's easy for the JP judges to simply deny any wrongdoing. And trying to get that order reviewed by a state district court is very expensive and time consuming, so much so that the respondent won't be able to do it. The JP judges know that. They count on it. They abuse their power and use it as a weapon to destroy their political opposition.
This is exactly the kind of abuse of power that the Grand Jury is designed to protect We the People from.
For a great and timely history of the power and use of the Grand Jury read this background:
http://americangrandjury.org/history_power.html
As I have said many times before, I will exhaust every lawful means of getting government back under the control of We the People. There is much corruption in government, especially in the Judiciary.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/09/when-is-it-time-to-fight.html
We the People can and must use every lawful means to eliminate this corruption if our children are to live in a free county and country, rather than a marxist democracy mob rule of men, making the rules as they go. Democracies never have worked for freedom anywhere throughout history. A Democracy will always lead to an Oligarchy (rule of the few) and loss of freedom. In short a Democracy is MOB RULE, and that is what we seem to have in American today especially in the judiciary. Over 2/3 of the people don't want health care. That is an undisputed fact even by the major media. In fact they don't talk about it. Where is the mechanism to bring the people who are shoving it down the American peoples throats to justice? Where is the remedy in justice for the little guy? It's in the Grand Jury and the petit (trial) jury.
"In addition to its traditional role of screening criminal cases for prosecution, common law grand juries had the power to exclude prosecutors from their presence at any time and to investigate public officials without governmental influence. These fundamental powers allowed grand juries to serve a vital function of oversight upon the government. The function of a grand jury to ferret out government corruption was the primary purpose of the grand jury system in ages past." Roger Roots, J.D.
If it's not a runaway, it's not a Real Grand Jury:
http://www.constitution.org/lrev/roots/runaway.htm
You have the right as a trial juror to judge of the law as well as the facts in any case you are on.
You already have that right. You don't have to lobby for it. You don't have to get any new laws passed.
You don't have to change the Constitution. You just have to understand and exercise your rights. You have to take command in the jury room, and educate your fellow jurors. You have to enforce the Constitution and nullify bad laws in the jury room. You have to uphold the God given "unalienable" natural laws expressed and protected by the Constitution in the jury room. It's your power, unless you give it away to the judge when he tells you that you don't have it. That is right. The judges abuse their power by saying you must take the law "the way I give it to you" in effect saying you are too stupid to understand it. This arrogance needs to be stopped and soon. In fact the most famous Judge to make this mistake was a signer of the Declaration of Independence, Samuel Chase. In the US v. Callender case attempted to rule that a jury could not decide the Constututionality of a law. It may have been partially by the following statement that he averted impeachment.
SAMUEL CHASE (Justice, U. S. Supreme Court and signer of the Declaration of Independence; in 1804): "The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts."
See your jury rights here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_state_language_on_jury_nullification.pdf
Read the Jury rights handbook here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_Jurors_Handbook.pdf
Some people would like you to believe that the ordinary citizen is incapable of understanding these issues. Some would like you to believe you are too dumb to read these laws and make sense of them. They want your mind in a box of their own creation. You need to think outside their box, like the founders did.
You need to understand and exercise your rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. If you don't you will lose those God given and Constitutionally protected rights forever, for yourself and your posterity.
I choose to fight with the law first. We shall see later how unlawful and corrupt these "rule of men" people really are. I say again. those who oppose this lawful idea of reviving the standing Grand Jury should be the first to be investigated. Without accusing them of anything, I would bet that many get a paycheck from some branch of government.
It seems that leftists don't want you to know these history lessons. It seems they don't want you to exercise your true power to stop corruption. So now it's up to you. You no longer can say "But what can we do about it?"
Paul Stramer
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
If Nevada can do this so can Montana!
A complete rout of the moderates and RINOs in the Republican Party in Nevada.
http://www.redstate.com/coldwarrior/2009/11/15/nevada-gop-has-new-conservative-leadership-from-the-bottom-up/
I am hearing this has also happened in Minnesota.
I hear this from a Resistnet blog by Cold Warrior that I have been commenting on.
http://www.resistnet.com/group/michaelsteelerncchairman?groupId=2600775%3AGroup%3A291603&page=1&xg_source=msg_com_group#c_b3f
http://www.redstate.com/coldwarrior/2009/11/15/nevada-gop-has-new-conservative-leadership-from-the-bottom-up/
I am hearing this has also happened in Minnesota.
I hear this from a Resistnet blog by Cold Warrior that I have been commenting on.
http://www.resistnet.com/group/michaelsteelerncchairman?groupId=2600775%3AGroup%3A291603&page=1&xg_source=msg_com_group#c_b3f
Helena Independent Record steps in it.
On Sunday the Helena Independent Record had an article by Martin J. Kidston entitled "State seeing new rise in anti-government, hate groups" and today an opinion piece by Travis McAdam of the Montana Human Rights Network entitled "Mack outside the mainstream".
http://www.helenair.com/news/state-and-regional/article_ccf7b5d2-d06b-11de-bc4e-001cc4c03286.html
http://www.helenair.com/news/opinion/article_4bfb6c3c-d195-11de-bd03-001cc4c03286.html
If you read the comments (discussion) section you will find that they are running vastly in opposition to the articles. In fact here is a comment by Gary Marbut of the Montana Shooting Sports Association about the first article.
Editor
Helena Independent Record
November 15, 2009 (200 words)
Dear Editor,
MHRN; Ready, Fire, Aim
Travis McAdam of the Montana Human Rights Network (MHRN) is troubled by folks who want our governments to operate within the constraints of the Constitution. Not surprising. That's MHRN's thing, being troubled.
MHRN was troubled about:
- U. of M. law professor Rob Natelson. They publicly accused him of "anti-Semitism," later learning that Natelson is Jewish.
- Me. They accused me of being a racist when an article I wrote was published by J.J. Johnson (friend J.J. is a very Black guy - MHRN was ignorant of this minor detail), coincidentally the same week presidential candidate and Ambassador Alan Keyes was a guest in my home (Keyes is Black, too - Montana had a chuckle over that glaring MHRN stumble).
- A Mission Valley guy, calling him an anti-Indian racist, only to be sued because he's a full-blood Native American (result - required MHRN apology).
MHRN's goal is to stifle free speech they dislike by accusing speakers of evil intent or connections. It's amusing that they are so often so wrong; a perpetual case of ready, fire, aim.
Watching the MHRN is more entertaining than watching the Three Stooges.
Although they're reliable for comic relief, hardly anyone takes them seriously.
Gary Marbut, president
Montana Shooting Sports Association
http://www.mtssa.org/
author, Gun Laws of Montana
http://www.mtpublish.com/
P.O. Box 4924
Missoula, Montana 59806
406-549-1252
Here is my comment which I published after the Sunday article:
Was it P.T. Barnum that said "Any publicity is good publicity?
What you quoted from our website at http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/ was essentially quoted correctly except it was wildly out of context. It would have been fair, however if you had included the link to our site.
The attitude of your article however was very prejudiced, and it shows vividly to your readers. All the MHRN has left are the same old tired buzzwords of the last decade, and the people don't believe them any more.
Your newspaper must be getting desperate for attention for you to keep on publishing that drivel, and like many other newspapers who don't print the real news but favor the liberal view you must be losing money by the barrel.
Wake up and realize that there is a reason the Glenn Beck show is so wildly popular and setting all kinds of records for attendance. Just trying to help the cause of true journalistic excellence.
Sincerely,
Paul Stramer
Co-founder of Lincoln County Watch.
http://www.helenair.com/news/state-and-regional/article_ccf7b5d2-d06b-11de-bc4e-001cc4c03286.html
http://www.helenair.com/news/opinion/article_4bfb6c3c-d195-11de-bd03-001cc4c03286.html
If you read the comments (discussion) section you will find that they are running vastly in opposition to the articles. In fact here is a comment by Gary Marbut of the Montana Shooting Sports Association about the first article.
Editor
Helena Independent Record
November 15, 2009 (200 words)
Dear Editor,
MHRN; Ready, Fire, Aim
Travis McAdam of the Montana Human Rights Network (MHRN) is troubled by folks who want our governments to operate within the constraints of the Constitution. Not surprising. That's MHRN's thing, being troubled.
MHRN was troubled about:
- U. of M. law professor Rob Natelson. They publicly accused him of "anti-Semitism," later learning that Natelson is Jewish.
- Me. They accused me of being a racist when an article I wrote was published by J.J. Johnson (friend J.J. is a very Black guy - MHRN was ignorant of this minor detail), coincidentally the same week presidential candidate and Ambassador Alan Keyes was a guest in my home (Keyes is Black, too - Montana had a chuckle over that glaring MHRN stumble).
- A Mission Valley guy, calling him an anti-Indian racist, only to be sued because he's a full-blood Native American (result - required MHRN apology).
MHRN's goal is to stifle free speech they dislike by accusing speakers of evil intent or connections. It's amusing that they are so often so wrong; a perpetual case of ready, fire, aim.
Watching the MHRN is more entertaining than watching the Three Stooges.
Although they're reliable for comic relief, hardly anyone takes them seriously.
Gary Marbut, president
Montana Shooting Sports Association
http://www.mtssa.org/
author, Gun Laws of Montana
http://www.mtpublish.com/
P.O. Box 4924
Missoula, Montana 59806
406-549-1252
Here is my comment which I published after the Sunday article:
Was it P.T. Barnum that said "Any publicity is good publicity?
What you quoted from our website at http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/ was essentially quoted correctly except it was wildly out of context. It would have been fair, however if you had included the link to our site.
The attitude of your article however was very prejudiced, and it shows vividly to your readers. All the MHRN has left are the same old tired buzzwords of the last decade, and the people don't believe them any more.
Your newspaper must be getting desperate for attention for you to keep on publishing that drivel, and like many other newspapers who don't print the real news but favor the liberal view you must be losing money by the barrel.
Wake up and realize that there is a reason the Glenn Beck show is so wildly popular and setting all kinds of records for attendance. Just trying to help the cause of true journalistic excellence.
Sincerely,
Paul Stramer
Co-founder of Lincoln County Watch.
Mossad agent Joseph Moshe arrested for exposing H1N1 vaccine as bio weapon
This is the original location of the video above.
http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=424274
to help back up the video:
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=27718
http://blogs.healthfreedomalliance.org/blog/2009/10/31/flashback-who-is-joseph-moshe/
http://www.biomedexperts.com/Profile.bme/78637/Moshe_Bar-Joseph
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Sunday Prayers for Patirots. Freedom requires your participation
Jer. 29, 11,12,14
The Lord said, I think thoughts of peace, and not of affliction: you shall call upon Me, and I will hear you; and I will bring back your captivity from all places. Lord, Thou hast blessed Thy land: Thou hast turned away the captivity of Jacob.
Glory be to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Ghost, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end, Amen
Arouse, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the wills of Thy faithful, that, by more earnestly following after the fruit of the divine work, they may the more abundantly partake of Thy mercies.
Epistle from the 24th Sunday after Pentecost.
Col. 1, 9-14
"Brethren, We cease not to pray for you, and to beg that you may be filled with the knowledge of the will of God, in all wisdom and spiritual understanding; that you may walk workthy of God, in all things pleasing, being fruitful in every good work, and increasing in the knowledge of God; strengthened with all might according to the power of His glory, in all patience and long-suffering with joy; giving thanks to God the Father, Who hath made us worthy to be partakers of the lot of the saints in light; Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of the Son of His love, in Whom we have redemption through His blod, the remission of sins."
Ps. 43, 8 ,9
Thou hast delivered us, O Lord, from them that afflict us; and hast put them to shame that hate us. In God we will glory all the day; and in Thy name will give praise for ever. Alleluia, alleluia. From the depths I have cried to Thee O Lord; Lord hear my prayer. Alleluia.
Gospel. Matt. 24, 15-35
At that time, Jesus said to His disciples, When you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place; he that readeth, let him understand: then they that are in Judea, let them flee to the mountains; and he that is on the house-top, let him not come down to take anything out of his house; and he that is in the field, let him not go back to take his coat. And woe to them that are with child, and that give suck, in those days. But pray that your flight be not in the winter, or on the sabbath: for there shall be then great tribulation, such as has not been found from the beginning of the world until now, neither shall be: and unless those days had been shortened, no flesh should be saved; but for the sake of the elect, those days shall be shortened;
Then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; do not believe him: for there shall arise false Crhists and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Behold, I have told it to you beforehand: if they therefore shall say to you, Behold, He is in the desert, go you not out; behold, He is in the closets, believe it not. For as lightning cometh out of the east, and appeareth even into the west, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Wheresoever the body shall be, there shall the eagles also be gathered together.
And immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven shall be moved; and then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven, and then shall all the tribes of earth mourn; and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with much power and majesty: and He shall send His angels with a trumpet and a great voice and they shall gather together His elect from the four winds, from the farthest parts of the heavens to the utmost bounds of them.
And from the fig-tree learn a parable: when the branch therof is now tender, and the leaves come forth, you know that summer is nigh. So you also, when you shall see all these things, know ye that it is nigh even at the doors. Amen I say to you, that this generattion shall not pass till all these things be done. Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words shall not pass away.
Be propitious, O Lord, to our supplications, and accept the offerings and prayers of Thy people: turn all our hearts unto Thee, that, being delivered from earthly desires, we may pass on to the enjoyments of heaven, Through our Lord Jesus Christ, in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God world without end. Amen.
INSTRUCTION CONCERNING PERJURY.
Amen, I say to you. (Matt, xxiv. 34.)
The Son of God here, and elsewhere in the gospel, confirms His word by an oath, as it were, for swearing is nothing else than to call upon God, His divine veracity, His justice, or upon His creatures in the name of God, as witness of the truth of our words, -- Is swearing, then, lawful, and when? -- It is lawful when justice or necessity or an important advantage requires it, and the cause is true and equitable. (Jer. iv.2.)
Those sin grievously, therefore, who swear to that which is false and unjust, because they call upon God as witness of falsehood and injustice, by which His eternal truthfulness and justice is desecrated; those sin who swear in a truthful cause whithout necessity and sufficient reason, because it is disrespectful to call upon God as witness for every trivial thing.
In like manner, those sin grieviously and constantly who are so accustomed to swearing as to break out into oaths, without knowing or considering whether the thing is true or false, whether they will keep their promise or not, or even if they will be able to keep it; such expose themselves to the danger of swearing falsely. "There is no one," says St. Chrysostom, "who swears often, who does not sometimes swear falsely, just as he who speaks much, sometimes says unbecoming and false things."
Therefore Christ tells those who seek perfection not to swear at all, (Matt. V. 34.) that they might not fall into the habit of swearing and from that into perjury. He who has the habit of swearing should therefore, take the greatest pains to eradicate it; to accomplish which it will be very useful to reflect that if we have to render and account for every idle word we speak, (Matt. xii. 36.) how much more strictly will we be judged for unnecessary false oaths! God's curse accompanies him who comits perjury, in all his ways, as proved by daily experience. He who commits perjury in court, robs himself of the merits of Christ's death and will be consumed in the fire of hell, which is represented by the crucifix and burning tapers, in presence of which the oath (in some places) is taken.
If you have had the misfortune to be guilty of perjury, at once be truly sorry, weep for this terrible sin which you have committed, frankly confess it, repair the injury you may have caused by it, and chastise yourself for it by rigorous penance.
Authored by Father Leonard Goffine. AD 1875
The Lord said, I think thoughts of peace, and not of affliction: you shall call upon Me, and I will hear you; and I will bring back your captivity from all places. Lord, Thou hast blessed Thy land: Thou hast turned away the captivity of Jacob.
Glory be to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Ghost, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end, Amen
Arouse, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the wills of Thy faithful, that, by more earnestly following after the fruit of the divine work, they may the more abundantly partake of Thy mercies.
Epistle from the 24th Sunday after Pentecost.
Col. 1, 9-14
"Brethren, We cease not to pray for you, and to beg that you may be filled with the knowledge of the will of God, in all wisdom and spiritual understanding; that you may walk workthy of God, in all things pleasing, being fruitful in every good work, and increasing in the knowledge of God; strengthened with all might according to the power of His glory, in all patience and long-suffering with joy; giving thanks to God the Father, Who hath made us worthy to be partakers of the lot of the saints in light; Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of the Son of His love, in Whom we have redemption through His blod, the remission of sins."
Ps. 43, 8 ,9
Thou hast delivered us, O Lord, from them that afflict us; and hast put them to shame that hate us. In God we will glory all the day; and in Thy name will give praise for ever. Alleluia, alleluia. From the depths I have cried to Thee O Lord; Lord hear my prayer. Alleluia.
Gospel. Matt. 24, 15-35
At that time, Jesus said to His disciples, When you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place; he that readeth, let him understand: then they that are in Judea, let them flee to the mountains; and he that is on the house-top, let him not come down to take anything out of his house; and he that is in the field, let him not go back to take his coat. And woe to them that are with child, and that give suck, in those days. But pray that your flight be not in the winter, or on the sabbath: for there shall be then great tribulation, such as has not been found from the beginning of the world until now, neither shall be: and unless those days had been shortened, no flesh should be saved; but for the sake of the elect, those days shall be shortened;
Then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; do not believe him: for there shall arise false Crhists and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Behold, I have told it to you beforehand: if they therefore shall say to you, Behold, He is in the desert, go you not out; behold, He is in the closets, believe it not. For as lightning cometh out of the east, and appeareth even into the west, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Wheresoever the body shall be, there shall the eagles also be gathered together.
And immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven shall be moved; and then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven, and then shall all the tribes of earth mourn; and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with much power and majesty: and He shall send His angels with a trumpet and a great voice and they shall gather together His elect from the four winds, from the farthest parts of the heavens to the utmost bounds of them.
And from the fig-tree learn a parable: when the branch therof is now tender, and the leaves come forth, you know that summer is nigh. So you also, when you shall see all these things, know ye that it is nigh even at the doors. Amen I say to you, that this generattion shall not pass till all these things be done. Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words shall not pass away.
Be propitious, O Lord, to our supplications, and accept the offerings and prayers of Thy people: turn all our hearts unto Thee, that, being delivered from earthly desires, we may pass on to the enjoyments of heaven, Through our Lord Jesus Christ, in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God world without end. Amen.
INSTRUCTION CONCERNING PERJURY.
Amen, I say to you. (Matt, xxiv. 34.)
The Son of God here, and elsewhere in the gospel, confirms His word by an oath, as it were, for swearing is nothing else than to call upon God, His divine veracity, His justice, or upon His creatures in the name of God, as witness of the truth of our words, -- Is swearing, then, lawful, and when? -- It is lawful when justice or necessity or an important advantage requires it, and the cause is true and equitable. (Jer. iv.2.)
Those sin grievously, therefore, who swear to that which is false and unjust, because they call upon God as witness of falsehood and injustice, by which His eternal truthfulness and justice is desecrated; those sin who swear in a truthful cause whithout necessity and sufficient reason, because it is disrespectful to call upon God as witness for every trivial thing.
In like manner, those sin grieviously and constantly who are so accustomed to swearing as to break out into oaths, without knowing or considering whether the thing is true or false, whether they will keep their promise or not, or even if they will be able to keep it; such expose themselves to the danger of swearing falsely. "There is no one," says St. Chrysostom, "who swears often, who does not sometimes swear falsely, just as he who speaks much, sometimes says unbecoming and false things."
Therefore Christ tells those who seek perfection not to swear at all, (Matt. V. 34.) that they might not fall into the habit of swearing and from that into perjury. He who has the habit of swearing should therefore, take the greatest pains to eradicate it; to accomplish which it will be very useful to reflect that if we have to render and account for every idle word we speak, (Matt. xii. 36.) how much more strictly will we be judged for unnecessary false oaths! God's curse accompanies him who comits perjury, in all his ways, as proved by daily experience. He who commits perjury in court, robs himself of the merits of Christ's death and will be consumed in the fire of hell, which is represented by the crucifix and burning tapers, in presence of which the oath (in some places) is taken.
If you have had the misfortune to be guilty of perjury, at once be truly sorry, weep for this terrible sin which you have committed, frankly confess it, repair the injury you may have caused by it, and chastise yourself for it by rigorous penance.
Authored by Father Leonard Goffine. AD 1875
Friday, November 13, 2009
I dare you to watch this all the way through. Deprogram the Matrix!
I guarantee you will have a new paradigm and will be able to completely think outside the box when you are done.
We just think we are "free men"
We just think we have a Constitution.
We just think we have an "American Dream" available to us.
We just think we have elections.
We just think we have courts.
We just think we have a law.
We just think we own property.
We just think we have freedom of speech.
We just think we have representatives.
We just think we have "constitutional rights".
We just think we have justice.
We just think we have a vote.
It's all a big lie and as long as we believe it and act accordingly we are SLAVES in the Matrix.
Click this link to get your mind deprogrammed, then click the link below to take action.
http://www.deprogram.us/deprogram.php
http://www.pacinlaw.org/home.php
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
We just think we are "free men"
We just think we have a Constitution.
We just think we have an "American Dream" available to us.
We just think we have elections.
We just think we have courts.
We just think we have a law.
We just think we own property.
We just think we have freedom of speech.
We just think we have representatives.
We just think we have "constitutional rights".
We just think we have justice.
We just think we have a vote.
It's all a big lie and as long as we believe it and act accordingly we are SLAVES in the Matrix.
Click this link to get your mind deprogrammed, then click the link below to take action.
http://www.deprogram.us/deprogram.php
http://www.pacinlaw.org/home.php
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Continental Congress 2009 considers repudiating all nation debt!
Dr. Edwin Vieira proposes to the Continental Congress wiping all national debt incurred by the United States government which was incurred unlawfully and without constitutional authority.
Watch all these proceedings of a lawful Continental Congress convened on Nov. 11th and running for 11 full days, with delegates from all 50 states, and streamed live on the Internet to the whole world.
Broadcast live from St. Charles IL here http://www.cc2009.us/
These broadcasts will also be edited and burned to DVD to be available some time after the close of the Continental Congress, the first such meeting in 235 years.
http://www.cc2009.us/
Watch all these proceedings of a lawful Continental Congress convened on Nov. 11th and running for 11 full days, with delegates from all 50 states, and streamed live on the Internet to the whole world.
Broadcast live from St. Charles IL here http://www.cc2009.us/
These broadcasts will also be edited and burned to DVD to be available some time after the close of the Continental Congress, the first such meeting in 235 years.
http://www.cc2009.us/
How can we bring back the Law of the Land and RESTORE AMERICA?
The Continental Congress 2009 is live world wide on the web now.
http://www.cc2009.us/
This started on Wednesday and is ongoing for 11 days.
It is being streamed live world wide on the Internet at the website.
In between live broadcasts the video window streams rebroadcasts of previous segments.
This is important. Watch as much as you can.
Paul
http://www.cc2009.us/
This started on Wednesday and is ongoing for 11 days.
It is being streamed live world wide on the Internet at the website.
In between live broadcasts the video window streams rebroadcasts of previous segments.
This is important. Watch as much as you can.
Paul
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)