by Anna Von Reitz
There is no such thing.
It is a literal impossibility to be a "sovereign" and a "citizen" at the same time.
"Sovereign citizen" is an oxymoron.
The term "sovereign" cancels out the term "citizen" and vice versa.
Look up the legal definition of these two words and it will be absolutely, glaringly, and forever apparent.
So if you hear people talking about "sovereign citizens" or calling me or anyone else a "sovereign citizen"---- you now know for sure that they are in fact either (1) ignorant as Pat's Pig or (2) are part of the problem and trying to cause trouble by "labeling"---- a propaganda technique which you probably first encountered in grade school.
"Oh, Jenny is a ........." and "Johnny is a......." and so and so is something else.
Anyone who survived High School should hear this kind of gossip and have a retch response.
I do.
And I immediately "tune out" such people, because Number One--- they are divisive, and Number Two, if they don't know the difference between "sovereign" and "citizen"----what can they possibly contribute to the conversation?
The phrase that they are probably striving for and getting all bungled up is, "sovereigns without subjects"--- from United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Jay: ".....at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they truly are the sovereigns of this country, but they are sovereigns without subjects."
quoted in ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 (1999) (2).
quoted in ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 (1999) (2).
Please note--- we are talking about "people" being the "sovereigns" of this country, not "persons" being sovereign over themselves or anything else.
That is again why we are owed a government of the people, by the people and for the people, not of the persons, by the persons, and for the persons.
Wake up, wake up, wake up......
---------------------------------------
See this article and over 200 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
