By Anna Von Reitz
It appears that there is no such court as the DISTRICT COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA established by any State of Alaska Constitution and no such court established by any State of Alaska Statute.
Oh, my, oh, dear.... I have been misaddressed by an unknown, unauthorized "court".....
Could it be a "Commission" -- as in "Military Commission" Court of the kind set up and amended via the Act of March 9th 1867?
Let's see:
The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 established Radical Reconstruction by dividing the former Confederate states into five military districts under federal control, requiring them to draft new constitutions guaranteeing Black men the right to vote and ratify the Fourteenth Amendment to be readmitted to the Union.
But, but, but.... we know that the same demands were made in the Northern States as well, where no such military commission ("carpetbagger") courts were supposed to exist, and which were not subject to any "radical reconstruction". Our actual States of the Union always guaranteed all free Negroes the right to vote. And, as we can demonstrate, although new Constitutions were forced, our States never did ratify the Fourteenth Amendment.
What's going on, kids? March 9th 1867 was the first day of Session for the 40th Congress,
Palaver about the details of the Reconstruction Acts was all that went on March 9th 1867 -- and the only Act passed by the U.S. Congress (British Territorial Rump Congress) that day was more like an Amendment to the First Reconstruction Act that passed earlier in the week.
That after-thought allowed Persons employed by the British Territorial Corporations known as "de facto" government employees to occupy offices of the "de jure" government--- but, as the U.S. Supreme Court reminds us in Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) -- such Persons couldn't just make up new offices for themselves that never existed in the de jure constitutional government.
Quote: "...the acts of a person assuming to fill and perform the duties of an office which does not exist de jure can have no validity whatever in law."
So, did the "Judiciary Courts of Alaska, Inc." just create a court out of thin air, and let their Persons occupy it without any statutory authority at all? It appears so.
We are told that the Alaska District Courts, which are not authorized in the Alaska Statute, either, are ---you guessed it --- United States COURTS and technically, don't exist in Alaska. They are in the District of Alaska, instead:
Location: James M. Fitzgerald U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building at 222 West 7th Avenue, room 229, Box/Suite #4. View map. Phone: 1-866-243-3814 toll free
And, we are told they have jurisdiction over the following list of subject matter:
Judges in the Alaska District Court system:
- Hear state misdemeanor cases, and cases regarding violations of city and borough ordinances
- Issue summonses, arrest warrants and search warrants
- Hear first appearances and preliminary hearings in felony cases
- Record vital statistics (in some areas of the state)
- Hear civil cases valued up to $100,000
- Hear small claims case ($10,000 maximum)
- Handle cases involving children on an emergency basis
- Hear domestic violence cases[1]
We are told that Judges in the Alaska District Court hear cases regarding violations of city and borough ordinances..... but as we already know, statutes, codes, ordinances, and regulations only apply to "persons", not people.
And what "State" are they talking about that was present in 1959 when these District of Alaska courts got started? Oh, the Territorial State of Alaska.... remember? Alaska entered Territorial "Statehood" in 1959 and couldn't be enrolled as a State of the Union because our States of the Union were not in Session to enroll Alaska at the time.
So, we have nailed it down.
I wasn't being addressed by any State of Alaska court authorized by the State of Alaska Constitution or defined in its State of Alaska Statutes; no, I was being addressed by a sneaky "federal" Military District Court operating in the "District of Alaska" --- an imaginary place that isn't supposed to exist in Alaska, and a different kind of "district" and a different kind of District Court entirely.
That's why Governor Dunleavy's Office said my unlawful eviction wasn't a "State" matter, even though there were a dozen cruisers clearly marked "STATE OF ALASKA" parked in my driveway.
Dunleavy and his Chief Justice are still responsible for hiring the Municipal Corporation Goons and letting them run rampant in Alaska, but at least we know whose leg to bite hardest --- the Provost Marshal General of the US Army.
The "entity" responsible for the illegal confiscation of my private property is a quasi-military Carpetbagger court just like they used in the Southern States after the so-called Civil War.
But it wasn't a war. It was a Mercenary Conflict. Remember? No Congress declared any "war". Oops.
So no matter if they are running a State of Alaska District Court or a District of Alaska Court, they can spin the verbiage all day long and.... it doesn't matter what they try to concoct.
They still have absolutely no jurisdiction over me or my physically surveyed property, especially since the "State" they were inhabiting got rolled over into Alaska, the State of the Union, as of October 1st 2020. And also since my expatriation under the Expatriation Act of 1868 has been tattooed on every Presidential butt since 1998.
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS;' NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS.
And you'd better all believe it.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
September 23rd 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
