Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Friday, November 18, 2022

Let's Make This Super Simple

 By Anna Von Reitz

Their Territorial and Municipal States are not our States. 

Their "States" are actually State Trusts and State-of-State business organizations.  

They aren't our physically defined States of the Union at all. 

Never have been.  Never will be. 

Their "States" are what are called "inchoate" or "incomplete" States, lacking physical substance of their own.  

When the Insular Tariff Laws were decided in the very early 1900's it occasioned the observation by Justice Harlan that they would lead to mischief --- mischief based on interpreting United States Possessions as a viable land and soil jurisdiction basis to launch a competing government. 

The present attempt to subourne the actual States of the Union using inchoate "States" and "United States Possessions" as an end run around the actual American Government is precisely the kind of mischief Justice Harlan could foresee. 

These inchoate "States" are doing their best to bust the world on a wooden nickel, but a lie is a lie and it remains a lie, no matter how you try to hide it and deny it.  

A State Trust is not a State. 
A State-of-State organization is not a State. 
A United States Possession is not The United States. 

Anyone who cares to search can find the speech where Former President Obama speaks of "our 57 States".  

He is referring to the inchoate States, the Insular States, and the US Possessions as "States".  All fifty-seven of them are constructed as State Trusts and State-of-State Business Organizations, and none of them have anything to do with our States and our people at all. 

Their legislation does not apply to us. 
Their mandates and requirements do not apply to us.
 
It stands forever on the Public Record that our Government consists of republican States, not democratic States, not theocratic States. 

So it should be fairly easy for any thinking man or woman to conclude that when they speak of "States" they are speaking in code, referring to their States as if they were our States, when in fact their States are nothing but corporate franchises of various kinds, and our States are physically defined, with rocks, trees, water, landmarks, and borders. 

It should also be a slam dunk in the minds of any thinking Jurist that the living people in our States of the Union are not subject to legislation produced by and addressed to our public employees and their dependents. 

So the agreements of the G20 regarding VAX "Passports" in no way affects the rights of the living people who are not government Persons or PERSONS  to travel freely, to use our own money, administer our own land and soil under our own power and pay no attention to "laws" that are addressed to corporations and their franchises and their officers and employees.  

The Mischief -- or what I call The Great Fraud -- is at an end. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

14 comments:

  1. Try telling that to the Airlines, the TSA and the passport office! They'll laugh at you all the way to the exit!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep!! all talk and no one will listen, they will throw in with the J sixers!

      Delete
  2. Here is what I tell them... to make a long thought process very short:

    Responding to mailings, dumped in my box, showing a likeness to my Name Name Name, as NAME N. NAME, or some such, with CAPS LOCK ON, I do a quick courtesy Return Service notice letter, centerized typing. I stuff the letter plus their mailing piece into a bigger envelope which reads:

    Return Service
    Notice To Agents and Principals

    No territorial or municipal officer exists to process your mailing as addressed, please process the enclosed as a Return Service.

    CAPS LOCK ON VERSIONS OF A NAME LIKE, My Given Name, FOR POSTAL REASONS OR OTHERWISE ARE NOT ME.

    Addressing me properly can get your items received.

    Cordially,

    -----
    All of my details are printed on the right margin, all of their details on the left margin, as I know my rights (right margins too) .

    The following happens:
    a. I never hear from them again;
    b. The next mailing they send is correctly addressed;
    c. I pretty much keep reducing corporate presumptions and 86 them as needed
    d. I seek minimum contact, other than life needs that i choose in support of Natural Law, which amount to all life's needs

    During phone calls, responding to questions, etc. I say, "I wish to preface our discussion with the following important drclaration: (yes, how can we help?) "I am a common man, not in commerce, and some words of art are not my words, such as D.O.B. and when you confirm my name and address be sure the CAPS LOCK has not stuck ON, and mailing or deliveries shall adhere to my lawful preferences or be returned. Then I confirm they have it Proper.

    The are just a couple more CORPS getting a double-bashing of my truth yet, in this manner. All else I've been done with long ago -- after correcting my political status under the full 928s. And what's more, the expectations I've set haven't yet left me disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 👏👏👏 Well done!

      Delete
    2. From a British perspective, perhaps the following would alert the people that work for the crooks to the fact they are participating in and supporting fraud;
      .
      The fictitious entity addressed, denoted by capital letters, is not based at this address. I suggest you establish
      a) that the fictitious entity exists
      b) the present address where the fictitious entity is based
      Then you will be able to address your mailings correctly.
      If you are successful in establishing the above, please advise me of the name(s) and address(es) of the current operator(s) of the fictitious entity, assumedly a trust so that I may divert all incorrectly addressed communications sent to me in the future. And perhaps enable me to recover payments made by me on behalf of those operator(s) in error.

      Delete
  3. Paul stramer this corey can I get some information from Ms. Anna Von Reitz about African Americans please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. avannavon@gmail.com

      Anna Von Reitz
      PO Box 520994
      Big Lake AK 99652

      907-250-5087

      Delete
  4. Search results regarding: "the observation by Justice Harlan" include: "In his dissents in the Insular cases (1901) involving overseas territories annexed by the U.S., Harlan wrote: 'The idea that this country may acquire territories anywhere upon the earth, by conquest or treaty, and hold them as mere colonies or provinces, the people inhabiting them to enjoy only such rights as Congress chooses to accord them, is wholly inconsistent with the spirit and genius, as well as with the words, of the Constitution.'”:
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/recalling-justice-harlans-dissent-on-u-s-overseas-colonies-11625593839
    -

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that link goes to - 404 page not found

      Delete
    2. Hey Chef, The D.O.I. website DEFINES the Insular Area "POLITICAL TYPES" right here on their own official website: https://www.doi.gov/oia/islands/politicatypes

      Delete
    3. anony 112022 411p
      Ive read once, that i believed is a credible source, that the MUNICIPALITIES, Territories, Districts, Corporate States, Insular States, and so on are "POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS".
      i dont know the different defintions for that Phrase, though or the way/s they use it.
      im still wondering: Subdivision of WHAT exactly?

      but i do believe true that:
      ALL POLITICS, RELIGIONS, AND MONEYS ARE FICTIONS.
      Therefore no man is required to participate in that system.
      Wars go along with Political, they are also Commerce-ial.

      Delete
  5. Anybody read 'BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES'? Especially chapter XV111 OF CORPORATIONS, pages 77 to 83 on my copy, written in 1891?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Blackstones deals with ENGLISH LAW.

    America is not connected to England since July 2, 1776:
    1) para1 unan.decl. "...necessary for one people to dissolve the politicial bands which have connected them with another...."
    2) last para "...Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is and ought to be totally dissolved..."

    the complicated "English Common Law System" deals with "Persons", "Individuals", "Kings and Queens"; so do their Affiliated Political and Religious and Monetary "Law" systems: "Ecclesiastical", "Exchequer", "Equity", "Law", other/s. all are Artificial PERSONS, Constructs, FICTIONS. FICTIONS in the "Realm".

    our American common law System deals with man.
    it is man -to - man. one- to- one. no middle-man, no meddling, just a jury of 12 equals, not peers -- peers are those in a higher social class than your own.
    we dont have social classes.
    we dont have Titles.
    we have man. and each man has equal station regarding life, living free, happy and safe under Gods authority = self-governing. This is ours.
    (any) man, regardless of formal training or lack of it, can use our common law system to make (his) claim, standing before God and (other) man.
    and repeat: it is the same common law system je-sus taught.
    [je suis, French: i am]

    its use disrupts the fraud and theft murder and lying intrigues of evil men.

    woman:janmarie

    ReplyDelete
  7. Let us humbly pray that people who run the global show will become powerless on their own accord.

    "The US government, through the Transportation Safety Administration, has signed yet another order extending the ban on unvaccinated international visitors until January 8, 2023. This means that no person who has managed to refuse the shot is allowed to come to the US for any reason. This is 30% of the world’s population, banned even to enter the US on their own dime. Something like this would have been inconceivably illiberal three years ago, and been a source of enormous controversy and outrage. Today, the extension hardly made the news. "
    Make America Free and Healthy m

    ReplyDelete