Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 4780 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.

Thursday, March 21, 2019

BC Witnesses


By Anna Von Reitz

I am getting a lot of questions, especially from older readers whose parents have died and who have fewer and fewer direct witnesses to their birth and identity.  It gets harder as you get older to be able to find such witnesses, but if we scratch our heads a bit there are usually plenty of people who have cause to know who we are and where we come from and know our family ties.  Anyone who has known you a significant (7 years or more) period of time and who knows your family and background may serve as a Witness.  

That may include: 
1. Family members; 
2. Friends, including friends from school; 
3. Religious officials; 
4. Co-workers; 
5. Employers; 
6. Public officials -- sheriffs, librarians, etc. 

Because today's world works on photo identifications, you will need a small color or black and white photo of yourself copied onto the paper that your Witnesses will sign.   I am providing a fictitious example of the verbiage for a typical BC Witness Testimony below. 

Remember that living people cannot give Affidavits ---- only Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit.   So if you are not acting as a corporation or a corporate officer, never label anything you submit for any court or public record an "Affidavit".  

Witness Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit

1.  "I, Joanne Felicity Adams, a living woman now living at 345 Howe Street, Lampasas, Texas,  

2.  have first-hand knowledge that  Joseph Allen Bates whose photograph appears hereon and who now lives in Akron, Ohio, 

3.  is the man who was born on July 1, 1949 in Coopertown, Michigan, 

4.  and from without the United States and under the penalties of perjury under the public law of The United States of America, 

5.  I do affirm this to be the truth.  

6.  This Witness Testimony is granted freely, without coercion or payment of any kind, 

7.  and so say I to all facts above this ____ day of  _________ in the year ___________ 

8.  and I have affixed my signature in affirmation of these facts before these Witnesses: 

By: __________________________________ (c) Joanne Felicity Adams, LS 

Witness of Public Notary to Signature

Lampasas County
Texas

Today I was visited by Joanne Felicity Adams and she did present appropriate identification and she did provide this Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit freely and without coercion before me and she did also freely sign this Testimony without coercion in my presence this _____ day of __________ in Witness whereof my hand and seal appear:  

By:  _____________________________________Public Notary; my commission expires on: ____________________. 

****Obviously, in the case of women who have married and changed their names you will need to add reference to the birth name---- something to the effect:  

"I have first-hand knowledge that Betty Jo Boop now living in Santa Monica, California, was born Betty Jo Melankamp in Cooperstown, Michigan, on July 1, 1950....."  *****

Please also note that it is okay for Witnesses to come from other places than where you now live.  An old High School pal may live in West Virginia and you may live in Los Angeles.  The only difficulty is that when you talk to them and ask you to do you this favor, you will need to ask the name of the county where they will get the Notary done so that you can complete the Notary information correctly. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

36 comments:

  1. did this last week, got my sister and 45 year old niece to witness, took it back to my maiden name. Because my maiden name has never been changed, only my married name has been changed.

    My affidavit not only id'd me as my private dba that the bank notary knows, it id'd me as the living woman dba as the legal married/divorced name. so I have a private id for my private christian name and the private dbd persona grata in one id.

    Also did a very simple affidavit, stating I the ORGANIC WOMAN reserves my God given right to make special appearances as I deem necessary to protect my unalienable rights. And I did a very simple ELECTION of POA using my natural persona grata private dba and in that affidavit again reserved my right to make special appearances and I revoked all other POA's back to circa nativity date. It cost $15. to record the 2 page POA and the cover letter. This week I am going to use the file number on the POA cover to file all anna's docs with the POA filed in the land records.

    I have filed Anna's docs with about 10 offices registered mail, without dispute. But, now I am filing and recording as the organic woman, without the authority of the clerk who is not a lawyer and not my representative and I dare her to challenge my jurisdiction.

    I realize POA needs to be filed first with the county land clerks. Then go back in file the Anna's docs as using the records number on the POA.

    Note: I gave authority to my public persona over all but not exclusive to: all accounts, LAND PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, COPYRIGHTS, and property of all matters, public and private, with reservation of my unalienable right to make special appearances as I deem necessary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. C.J. great comment, all my filings for myself and one sister were recorded without incident... guess they needed the recording fees and it was not done in a major metropolitan area. After mail issues, I am waiting my NEW PASSPORT...

      On a related note in Anna's other posting today, what is your suggestion on collecting over forty years of records (my case) to document the expenses paid on all mortgages, car payments, taxes to federal and state not to mention all electric and gas bills..... Did you keep all your records??
      Just adding some humor...

      My suggestion is on that posting.... Do you have a suggestion in lieu of locating all those records ???

      Nicee to see you on the blog...

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Richard, the issue is, different strokes for different folks. We are all individuals with individual issues we need to address and take action.
      Let me share this with you. Got my ss in june. feb 2019, check was cut by $251. Called ss, they said it was from 2006 tax filing I did. Now, no deficiency notice and no lien notice. When I asked her to send them so I can dispute them, she acted very strange indeed. WHY did she act very strange indeed? Because they can only send you those notices, if you ACTUALLY OWE THE TAXES. They can send statements every month if they want, but they can't send you those deficiency and levy notices unless you are actually a taxpayer. Then you still have 90 days to dispute [your right]. Now, they are in a catch 22, they took the money in violation of law. That's fraud. Now, they have no standing. I had stopped getting any notices in 2015 when I wrote them a letter, telling them I was going to prosecute if you sent my another statement about the alleged 2100. due, unless they would send me the deficiency and levy notice.
      Now, I'm ticked. So I know how currency is created, and how they use our trusts and how the trusts are a never ending supply of wealth and I know I am the owner and beneficiary and I know I am alive and I know they can't make use of the trust, without my ACCEPTANCE [OF THEIR USE OF MY TRUST]. I Know I am the creditor because they have no assets of their own because they are bankrupt. I know they took everything to use as credit on their debt. I know they transferred their debt illegally in violation of their own laws, regarding their bankruptcy because they can only discharge my debt, because they have no assets of their own to repay me, their creditor. BASICALLY I KNOW THE ENTIRE SCHEME, how its started, how it works and who I am in the whole scheme of things. So I did a 7 page affidavit, putting all I just told you in very detailed writing, with court cases and statutes to boot.
      Then I did another affidavit of CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.
      It included presentment to me within 30 days of receipt of the affidavit, the notice of deficiency and notice of levy, they used to place the 2,100 levy on my social security. [They don't have them, nor can they issue them especially after the fact]. Another condition, that my ss account be fully reinstated. And I would give them upon receipt of those notices, as proof of claim, the right to make use of my private estate trust to settle the account. Then I told them, if they refuse to settle the account and if they fall silent to the settlement offered pursuant to U.S. LAW, then have they committed crimes. Because by law, they are to discharge all creditors debt dollar for dollar, but they have to provide proof of claim first. No proof of claim...then Houston we have a problem. See I am a woman and I SETTLE all true debts upon presentment of proof of claim. See I know, within the law, I was never a taxpayer and never liable and they know it, too! This is why from 2006 to date, no notice of deficiency or levy was ever issued. I am quite willing to SETTLE any and all debts, I as a woman make, but I don't SETTLE anything, with anyone without proof of claim. Now, its on them, to settle the account, not me. Law requires those notices be sent, no notices, then they have no standing and can make no legal or lawful claim against me. Do you see how in the creditor position, the burden to settle the debt is on them? So that's how I did it for this issue. Not all the issues are the same. As Anna said you gotta know who you are! You gotta know how currency is created and how they used the B/C to create that currency. You gotta know what currency is...its debt with compounded interest. For all of it, you are the creditor. Every dollar borrowed from you needs to come back with compounded interes

      Delete
    4. Thank you for the welcome to the blog. I come and go! Hope you enjoy my posts and hope they are some light on a very dark, system.

      Delete
    5. C Johnson...its not just the notice of deficiency or Lein notice....its the fact that their is no "REAL ASSESSMENT", because to get out of liabilty, they make you "self-assess" yourself under "penalties of pergury" to boot...!!
      Why not just say send me a verified "ASSESSMENT" signed under "penalties of perjury", from a real man or woman working as agents for the IRS, and you would be more than willing to pay the deficientcy...!!

      They will never do it, because they know all too well about "liability"...!!! I bet they have regular meetings with all their agents warning them to never give your real name ANF never sign anything, especially under "penalties of perjury".....!!!

      Delete
    6. James, its not about the assessment at all. That's a belief that has no basis in fact. Don't buy the fraud.
      Ok I'll play James, please show me in the codes, where the assessment locks you into paying the taxes? I am very sorry to tell you I have not found that in title 26 or title 28 and I have read both several times. You can not prove that in court. But, you can use that to get yourself into a load of trouble.
      LIABILITY has nothing to do with you filing or not filing.
      WHY JAMES? BECAUSE ONLY TAXPAYERS WHO ARE LIABLE TO PAY INCOME TAXES HAVE TO FILE TAX FORMS. YET NO LIABILITY EXISTS IF A NON-TAXPAYER COMPLETES THE FORM. NO LIABILITY IS CREATED BY FORMS. ALL LIABILITY IS CREATED BY CONGRESSIONAL ACT. NO CONGRESSIONAL ACT CREATED LIABILITY BY USE OF A FORM. DUH! That my dear is a frivolous argument.

      I will tell you what is not frivolous: income what is it? what is the residency? what is the corporate standing?
      Can these things be proved on and for the record?
      I can tell you what's not frivolous! can they send you a notice of deficiency or notice of levy if you are not liable?
      Regardless of whether you filed or not, if you are not LIABLE, YOU ARE NOT LIABLE!And your liability has nothing to do if you file or not. what about that can you not comprehend? L-I-A-B-I-L-I-T-Y! 'IF' you are liable!

      Now, let me share with you a court ruling: miranda vs arizona “The mere fact that he signed a statement which contained a typed-in clause stating that he had "full knowledge" of his "legal rights" does not approach the knowing and intelligent waiver 'REQUIRED' to relinquish constitutional rights." DID YOU SEE THAT WORD..."REQUIRED'?

      James do you know what is '"REQUIRED', for you to willing and knowingly surrender your rights, as they are protected by the Constitution? Let me tell you, its much more than a statement on a form, much more! The issue James, you don't know how the system works!

      You need do some research on the international right to citizenship and/or nationality. Its all about 'OATHS OF ALLEGIANCE'.

      Just curious James, did you ever take any OATH OF ALLEGIANCE to any country or nation? If you did was it an OATH to the United States or UNITED STATES, INC?

      James have you learned nothing from Anna's blog?

      Delete
    7. FYI about title 26, I have read schedule c 'not the entire title. my apologies for not stating that above. schedule c is the part that applies to...wait for it...INDIVIDUAL....taxpayers!

      Delete
    8. Just for a reference James, here's a link to IRS INFO ABOUT SCHEDULE C. https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i1040sc

      QUESTION: from this reference for individuals who are liable for income taxes, can you tell me what entities are being addressed on this page. take a very, very close look at it...what entities are they giving instructions to...for INDIVIDUAL tax payer purposes. Come on, its not that hard James? LIABILITY...'IF' you are LIABLE!

      Delete
  2. This video is about yellow vest in france. If the people of the world would truly wake up to they lawful standing, we could end all of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP0nhqnB6ec

    ReplyDelete
  3. In relation to the suggested verbage in the article.

    It has been advised many times that the living don't use "Affidavit" but use Witness testimony in the form of an Affidavit.

    It has also been advised not to sign under the "Penalty of Perjury" but to use under the penalties of bearing false witness. The article uses under the penalties of perjury under the public law of The United States of America. Is this statement different? Please advise. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. purposes of affidavit. https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/affidavits/
    I find no issue with use of affidavit.

    However, under penalty of perjury. That is a U.S. STATUTE, I am not subject to the U.S. so I don't use it. I am not subject to the U.S. title 18: of the crime of penal-ty of perjury and I am not going to agree to give them jurisdiction by claiming their right to prosecute me.

    I always say, jurisdiction is everything and how do they get it. You have to think before you sign!

    "Eyewitness testimony is the account a bystander or victim gives in the courtroom, describing what that person observed that occurred during the specific incident under investigation. Ideally this recollection of events is detailed; however, this is not always the case. This recollection is used as evidence to show what happened from a witness' point of view."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And most eyewitness testimony is worthless because they don't remember things as clearly as they thought....!!
      But that said , I would rather the court find two witnesses (as the bible instructs), rather than heresy forensic evidence of no value from unscrupulous prosecutors only out to convict...the truth be damned...!!

      Delete
    2. James, reality please, come out of the clouds. The system doesn't care what you think about the use of witnesses, neither does it care.

      Delete
  5. C. Johnson ,
    Please contact me. I would love it if you could come on our call to help explain the credit/debt/BC. You have a great understanding of that system .

    Kevin Cote' L.S.
    Patriotfarmer58@protonmail.com
    845 987 0084 mobile

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Patriot58, IF YOU AGREE, I will send you a private email address and send an explanation, in a private writing, for your comprehension, a detailed description of how the system actually operates. Because my PRIVATE Friend, it is my firm belief within a few pages, you will have a clear knowledge of the truth and then you can take it to your group and clearly teach them TRUTH. If you after the email, still remain unclear, than I would gladly arrange with you an opportunity for PRIVATE communication, to assist you with your PRIVATE inner standing of the system and to remove your continued non-comprehension.
      I will send you a PRIVATE EMAIL to confirm your agreement to my terms as herein stated.
      This agreement bears a "Conditional Acceptance", is as herein stated: all my Private identifiers, I authorize, you to make use of, are restricted to, your PRIVATE use for the purposes of our Private Communication. Any PUBLIC use by you of my PRIVATE identifiers is strictly forbidden and furthermore would be a violation of right of use of, my PRIVATE copyrights and trademarks.

      If you choose to agree with my terms and conditions and agree to my Condition Acceptance than please post below, the following: "I agree."

      Delete
    2. Patriot58, make great contracts [agreements]! Do NOT JUST give it away!

      Delete
    3. PATRIOT58 1611 King James Bible "“Henceforth I call you not seruants, for the seruant knoweth not what his lord doth, but I haue called you friends: for all things that I haue heard of my Father, I haue made knowen vnto you.”

      AND

      Matthew 10:8 freely ye haue receiued, freely giue.

      Delete
    4. Contracts again...will we ever get rid of contract law.....the bottom line is if no one can be trusted (And no one can), than we are stuck with this system and attorneys forever....!!

      Delete
    5. James, NO, we will never get rid of contracts, you would know that if you knew anything about contracts. If you don't like contracts, then next time you car is not repaired right don't seek warranty, or the pizza you ordered was not fixed as ordered don't complain, or next time you go to the grocery store don't expect the milk to not be sour and if it is you have no right to take it back and get it replaced.
      Your entire life is contracts, most of them you don't even think about them. I've explained this before, but you still don't get it. See the difference between you and I, I know how the system works and I want to use it, to alleviate future misunderstandings and possibility for disputes. You get run over by the system, because you agree with it, until you have to fight your way out of your SILENT COMPLIANCE.
      Most of your life is spent in implied or verbal contracts. If you don't want to deal with contracts. move out into the middle of the sahara desert and never have contact again with any other man or woman. Because if you are alive and live among the rest of us, you will deal with contracts. Its better you learn how to use them, than to blindly believe they don't exist.
      I use contracts! I am alive. MEN AND WOMEN HAVE A RIGHT TO MAKE UNLIMITED CONTRACTS.

      Delete
  6. A corporation is a fiction and cannot attest to anything, only a living wo/man can do that. I question your assertion, Ann, that only a corporation can submit an affidavit. Fictions can't write or compose briefs! Then you say living wo/men CAN submit "testimony in form of an affidavit." WTF!

    ReplyDelete
  7. If your witnesses are legal fictions that have not claimed back their status how is that possible?
    I wish I lived right next door to C Johnson to be honest - I live thousands of miles away from my Nation State of birth so getting witnesses etc is very difficult - trying to inform people from my birth Nation State what is going on because right now they trying to secure chain of title on land that goes back to the 1800's that belongs with my grandparents and get this my Mom knew nothing about this land but you bet your ass they do because they wanting my mom to sign paperwork pertaining to my now deceased grandparents for that land and they have included all their vital information on the forms they looking to get her and my uncle to sign off on - no way is she signing trying to inform uncle what to do but he dealing with 4 young children of which their mother has been killed by one of their drug overdoses -Poppy Bush and the herion killing fields that are troops are protecting in Afghanistan this is why they went in there
    http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/21-goals-of-the-illuminati-and-the-committee-of-300/
    And this hep C crap they pushing on tell lie vision to their baby boomers - do not believe your practicing phisicians - knew a guy they told him he had this did their six month treatment said he was 'cured' and couple months later they found him dead bleeding from the mouth, ears and nose
    Rockefeller medicine anyone
    This is outright insanity that they can get away with this
    All comments made without prejudice and all rights reserved

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dean and Shelby, whoa...wait a minute, you are missing a very important truth. The PERSONA GRATA! You must comprehend what the PERSONA GRATA [private d.b.a.] is and how it bridges the gap between the two realms of existence: public and private. Anna has written many times about the private d.b.a. what it is and how it functions as the signatory on all documents lawful and legal, including affidavits. all of us have it. it is the national non-u.s. citizen found in u.s. TITLE 8. it is the NATURAL INDIVIDUAL. A natural individual can have the status of public or private, depending on how you make use of it. This is why so many times I have posted about the 3 identities. If you don't comprehend the 3 identities, you need to do that and you need to think about the functions of each one within law and legal.
      first identity: real you...'I am'
      second identity:persona grata, natural individual, legal signatory on all legal documents.
      third identity: U.S. PERSON, FICTION, man created, inorganic not a natural PERSON. It is inorganic: corporate is not a natural person. a corporation was only made a PERSON by use of a LEGAL TERM DEFINITION. Anyone and everyone should know a corporation is not a NATURAL PERSON as men and women would think of a NATURAL PERSON.
      Please hear what I am posting!
      The natural use, by men and women of the word PERSON means People. But, that word was changed into a TERM and that term was given a meaning that is un-natural [different than the natural use by men and women]. The unnatural meaning for the TERM 'PERSON' is a corporation, sole proprietor, association or partnership or any natural person who would be the owner or partner of said 'REGISTERED' corporation.
      IF YOU DO NOT COMPREHEND what is within this comment, you will never be able to comprehend how it all works. Read all Anna's posts concerning the private d.b.a. Comprehending this is crucial. You must think about these things, if you will think, the lights within you will come on and you will begin to comprehend how to make use of your 3 identities.
      FYI...REMEMBER ALWAYS: there is a LANGUAGE that is not NATURAL to men and women. That language is the 'LANGUAGE OF THE LAW'. It is foreign and ambiguous to us, men and women. Do not think when they are using JOHN JAMES DOE that they are talking about John Doe or John James Doe, they are not!

      Delete
    2. C Johnson..your explanation leaves out a very critical legal postion....that everyone everywhere is a "LIER" and a "CON"...!! I MEAN EVERYONE....there isn't one honest person in the world today...so how do you contract with "LIERS "and "THIEVES"who from the start will not honor you contract or anyone eles contract...!!

      Our problem is still money...has any of you geniuses come up with a better way to trade than using all these instraments, or even real money...!!

      That is our underlying problem living in this world...!!You will be fighting forever if we don't find a better way to trade...!!

      Delete
    3. James, if you knew anything about what you complain about, you would know nothing you post is truth. If you knew how instruments and trusts and discharge and bankruptcy really works in the system, you would post such thoughtless [lacking knowledge and thought] comments. The more you post the more I know you don't have a clue. Maybe what would help you, is if you realized what anna has posts a gazillon times...the U.S. IS BANKRUPT! Do you know what the U.S. BEING BANKRUPT MEANS TO YOU PERSONALLY? No you don't!

      Delete
    4. BEST VIDEO I have ever found, regarding CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE. learn something about contracts James: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyvkiRMWQsA

      Delete
  8. Thinking 'OUT LOUD...EXTREMELY OUT LOUD':
    ‘I am’ was ruled dead. ‘I am’ was issued by Cert. of L/B a 'PERSONA GRATA' known as: natural PERSON [both private d.b.a and U.S. CITIZEN (dual citizenship U.S. TITLE 8) As it says in Title 8: both are subject to the laws of the U.S.
    But, where in that dual citizen do ‘I am’ exist? Nowhere! Why the ruled me dead, lost at sea, gone. By ‘I am’ being lost at sea, they made themselves trustee over my estate and laid claim to my EQUAL portion of all the wealth of America. Then they made use of my PERSONA GRATA as signatory/representative [another legal person]. Why? because ‘I am’ still missing, lost at sea. The American is gone. The signatory is the National, of the U.S. subject to the laws of the U.S. [Comprehend I am not defining a U.S. NATIONAL, as a U.S. NATIONAL and National of the U.S. are 2 different status'].
    The issue is the American State, National is missing. Where is ‘I am’? FYI within the 1611 KJV ‘I am’ is the Son of God, heir and subject to the Kingdom of God and the Earth and fulness thereof belongs to God and his sons on the Earth, by heavenly law. Who are joint heirs to that Kingdom? Whom the Son sets free, is free in deed. Who does he set free? Men and women [organic PEOPLE] with living souls! He made them equal with him!
    FACT: IN LAW,
    the cert. of L.B. does not bear ‘I am’ signature.
    no natural death certificate was ever issued.
    no document bearing ‘I am’ signature gave authority to either the United States or UNITED STATES, INC. to be my trustee.
    no document bearing ‘I am’ signature ever pledge allegiance to the United States or UNITED STATES, INC.
    no document bearing ‘I am’ signature by sworn, affidavit, based upon my right to choose citizenship, ever agreed to waive any of my unalienable rights as an American State, National.
    The lawful name; Christian and/or Family of ‘I am’ was never changed, when a LEGAL MARRIAGE OCCURRED. What was changed was the LEGAL NAME on the account.
    No document bearing my signature exists whereby POA was elected by ‘I am’.

    FACT: IN LAW,
    The entire system is a paper trail. The paper trail is missing all of the above signatures and documents. The PERSONA GRATA is not I, it is only ‘A’ [one] representative for the estate, but it is ‘UNDER JURISDICTION’ of the U.S. as a National, created by the U.S. Said National is SUBJECT to the U.S. pursuant to U.S. TITLE 8. It has a say so, in the trust, but can be over ridden by the TRUSTEE, because the TRUSTEE is the United States. The National is not above the U.S. ‘ONLY’ ‘I am’ is above the U.S. ‘ONLY’ ‘I am’ is above the jurisdiction of the U.S. ‘I am’ is one of ‘WE THE PEOPLE’. ‘I am’ is not a natural individual. ‘I am’ is a living soul, with a flesh and blood body, ORGANIC PEOPLE per they definition. ‘I am’ is the One, who existed before the issuance of the cert. of LB.

    Issue for ‘I am’: I have been ASSUMED TO BE DEAD and it has been ASSUMED the Cesti que vie TRUSTEE is the UNITED STATES and it has been ASSUMED a designated signatory of the U.S. [PERSONA GRATA] can lawfully and legally sign any and all documents the TRUSTEE needs to have signed for the purposes of the TRUSTEE. Why has this ASSUMPTION been allowed? BECAUSE SILENCE IS AGREEMENT AND DEAD (cont. below)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PEOPLE CAN SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES. Without dispute and proof of dispute on and for the record, the assumption stands as the record.

      NOTICE OF CLAIM OF LIFE, with proof of claim must established on the record and special appearances with ELECTION OF A POA and reserving RIGHT to make special appearances in the PUBLIC must be the first step of execution of re-establishing the TRUST and FULL RIGHTS of the TRUST back to ‘I am’ as one of the ORGANIC PEOPLE. Then can ‘I am’ send my ELECTED POA into the PUBLIC as the only LAWFUL REPRESENTATIVE of my Trust, as TRUSTEE.

      Then can the LAWFULLY ELECTED POA, bring all ANNA’S docs back to the land and soil.

      But, ‘I am’ must make a special appearance first, making CLAIM OF BEING ALIVE AND THAT MY DEATH WAS ONLY ASSUMPTION, UNLESS A CERTIFICATE OF NATURAL DEATH BE PRESENTED. Until said CERTIFICATE be presented, death can not be official, only assumed! And assumptions once challenged must be confirmed on and for the record.

      ANNA, now, that I have thought out loud, what say you?

      Delete
  9. CJ...
    Remember that living people cannot give Affidavits ---- only Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit. So if you are not acting as a corporation or a corporate officer, never label anything you submit for any court or public record an "Affidavit".

    This statement comes directly from anna's article, 'BC Witness' dated March 21, 2019...where you commented🤷

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. ps. MPS think of Anna's other AFFIDAVITS, why no witnesses? But on the affidavit you referenced, why TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES?

      Delete
    3. MPS
      Let me apply to you this way and for everyone:
      Anna's teachings cannot be comprehended in full until these two things are fully and completely comprehended first:
      1.) the use of stylization with the statutes
      2.) the use of TERMS as replacement of WORDS, within the statutes

      Unless these 2 USES [i.e. means to do something] are fully comprehended nothing is going to make sense to the normal minds, of men and women. Everything is going to be skewed.

      So, let me separate this for you if I can:
      within an affidavit, the one she was talking about, you have 2 legal terms to take into consideration for the sake of comprehension.
      1.) affiant
      2.) witness
      Both are titles. Titles are given to CORPORATE ENTITIES, right? Titles are given to PERSONS! Who has jurisdiction over PERSONS? Who gives authorization and approval [BY SEAL OF APPROVAL] to a person to testify as a witness for the affiant? The government! Right? Are the affluent [in the case of an affidavit that needs 2 witnesses] the same PERSONS? NO! RIGHT? If an affiant needs no witnesses, then that affiant can simply sign the doc and have a notary agree the affiant, with fact, the affiant and the person signing are one and the same PERSON. And that PERSON is known AS A PERSON by the notary, usually by verification of DRIVER'S LICENSE.

      However, in the affidavit Anna is talking about, the affiant is not known to the NOTARY. The affiant must have 2 witnesses to verify to the NOTARY and ANYONE ELSE that sees the affidavit, who the person is that is the affiant. Those 2 witnesses are bearing testimony as witnesses on the record that they have personal knowledge of the circumstances that are involved in the affidavit and they can in a court, be a witness to anything within the affidavit, as being truth. Who then is proclaiming truth? the affiant or the 2 witnesses? They are PERSONS for the purposes of establishing court [PUBLIC] records for the UNITED STATES. Then if the notary finds these two witnesses credible as U.S. PERSONS AS WITNESSES, subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. to bear this testimony, the NOTARY WILL GRANT APPROVAL on behalf of the govt, for them to sign and will put the seal on the approval, for said document to be transported into the public realm [PUBLIC RECORDS].
      So, what you are doing from Anna's docs, is you are confusing affiant and witnesses. However, the affiant and the witnesses are both PERSONS...how do we know. The titles: affiant and witness.
      Depending on the context of the doc. you must decide if the affiant is able to make the affidavit with or without witnesses. If witnesses are needed, those witnesses must be corporate entities. If an affidavit is made by me the woman, I need witnesses. I cannot submit into the public realm anything written by me without witnesses...why? they have no jurisdiction over men and women. That does not stop me from submitting affidavits. Only when I do, I must have witnesses.
      REMEMBER WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO...YOU ARE TRYING TO TRANSMIT INFORMATION INTO ANOTHER WORLD. YOU HAVE TO PUT IT INTO 'TERMS' THEY CAN MAKE USE OF. IT'S LIKE A 10TH DIMENSIONAL BEING TRYING TO TALK TO A 1 DIMENSIONAL BEING. THAT 10TH DIMENSIONAL BEING IS BETTER SERVED BY USING THE PROCEDURES AND LANGUAGE OF THE 1-DIMENSIONAL BEING, IF THE 1-DIMENSIONAL BEING IS TO COMPREHEND. THUS, IF YOU ARE ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF A LEGAL PERSON WHEN DOING AFFIDAVITS, NO WITNESSES NEEDED. IF YOU ARE ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF A MAN OR WOMAN, 2 WITNESSES WHO ARE LEGAL WITNESSES MUST BE USED TO GIVE TESTIMONY.
      Hopes this helps. So what capacity are you acting in, when making an affidavit? Go back and think about Anna's affidavit and comprehend what she is doing with it!
      PS. TOOK DOWN MY ORIGINAL POST FOR SPELLING ERRORS. IT IS NOW CORRECTED.

      Delete
  10. ALSO, to everyone, if you don't have an legal dictionaries, you need to buy at least one. I have 3 and several law procedures books. Whenever a question arises, I research. I got my books off of amazon and most of them have references to court cases. Law 101 I have the 1st addition. Here's the amazon link: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=law+101&ref=nb_sb_noss_1
    ps. I am sharing with you what I have learned, hopefully I am serving you by cutting down your research time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And if you are of the mindset that LEGAL is speaking to you in ENGLISH, then you will never comprehend what Anna or I or anyone else knows as truth.
      LEGAL is not speaking to you in ENGLISH or any other LANGUAGE that is natural for men and women to make use of, for purposes of communication. You will stay confused and without comprehension if you do not learn this FOREIGN LANGUAGE called LEGALESE.
      Just as is you want to learn spanish or german, you would have to learn the way they make use of their words. That is exactly what you are dealing with here. You must learn the language of the law!

      Delete
  11. This is the excerpt from your above writing
    patriot 58 IF YOU AGREE, I will send you a private email address and send an explanation, in a private writing, for your comprehension, a detailed description of how the system actually operates....

    CJ...i will like very much also to have a thorough understanding of how "the" system operates. Can you samesend to me the same info as you send patriot58? I will certainly be in agreement with you privacy policy. Thank you so very much. If you will I will send to you on private my email.tu

    This is the excerpt from your above writing
    patriot 58 IF YOU AGREE, I will send you a private email address and send an explanation, in a private writing, for your comprehension, a detailed description of how the system actually operates.

    ReplyDelete
  12. MPS and Patriot58 this is a junk, non-private whatever, email address. make contact with me there. lightcoming@gmx.com
    I am a private woman and in order to protect my privacy, this is how I allow others to contact me. DO NOT SEND ANYTHING TO ME, AT THAT ADDRESS, TO WHICH YOU CHOOSE TO KEEP PRIVATE. I CHOOSE TO NOT COMMUNICATE WITH PRIVATE MEN AND WOMEN IN PUBLIC FORUMS ABOUT THINGS THAT CAN BE PRIVATE TO THEM OR TO MYSELF. I HOPE YOU COMPREHEND THE IMPORTANCE OF WHAT I AM SAYING.
    Just as there are private and public realms of law and legal. There are private and public realms in our PRIVATE 'CONVERSATIONS' and our PUBLIC 'COMMUNICATIONS'.
    Privacy is a right, make use of it, in everything you do!
    Also comprehend, I have a loaded plate. Response may not be immediate.

    ReplyDelete