Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Saturday, June 30, 2018

More "Masonic Conspiracy" Bushwah


By Anna Von Reitz

More "Masonic Conspiracy" Bushwah

People never cease to amaze me with their capacity for missing essential information and facts that are literally "right before their eyes".


The Great Seal of the United States, as you can already clearly see, is always surrounded by what? A circle.

Why?

Because the Federal United States to which this seal refers operates under what?

Delegated Powers.

The circle announces to the world that the entity being represented is operating under delegated sovereignty.

So, the issue is not the design of The Great Seal of the United States, but the design of the actual sovereign seal, which is The Great Seal of the United States of America.

The Great Seal of the United States of America always appears without a circle around it.

Why?

Because it refers to the unrestricted and unlimited international powers granted by the States to The United States of America in 1776.

As I have explained before, the States had need of mutual combined representation in international affairs immediately after the Declaration.

Under international law at that time, they had to have a sovereign to sponsor and underwrite their operations in international jurisdiction.

They chose to operate The United States of America under the Coat of Arms of William Belcher, a Colonel in the Continental Army, who was already a "sovereign in his own right" in England as a result of the Norman Conquest.

If you look up the most common rendition of the Belcher Coat of Arms you will see for yourselves that it is the foundation of the Great Seal of The United States of America, and if you look up the actual Great Seal of the United States you will see that it is simply an enclosed/encircled version of the same design.

All the discussions and artistic efforts and druthers and designs of the Freemasons in Congress, and whether or not they wanted a phoenix represented or an eagle, is all consigned to the dust bin of other Congressional designs in general.

The actual symbol on the both Great Seals is undeniably and actually an American Bald Eagle, and that, too, is apparent to anyone who cares to open up their eyes and look -- instead of indulging themselves in ugly and convoluted fantasies and questionable "supposes" about the motivations, intentions, and desires of men who have been dead for over two centuries.

The facts and the Seals --- both of them --- speak for themselves.

It was ultimately decided that the "Federal United States" had to conform to the source of its "Delegated Power" --- The United States of America, so both Great Seals are identical, except that one is enclosed by a circle, and the other is not.


----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

21 comments:

  1. Vested powers. Not delegated. Vested....

    ReplyDelete
  2. The people are not Sovereign. God is. The states are vested with authority from God. Not from the people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go away, PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    2. Again with these delegates powers....!! Are we going to be hammered over the head with these ridiculous 19 delegations of treason forever....!! Trash the constitution and let's start over...!! fact, it's time to re-claim our "INDEPEDANCE " again..!!

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Frank O'Collins is definitely a servant of "God". Is. 65:11 identifies God and Mene as the Babylonian deities the Israelites were guilty of serving. Hint: troop and number are their names hidden by deceitful translators. You want to quibble about delegated vs. vested? Absurd hairs to split! If states or States are vested with authority from the Creator(s) and NOT the people, as you contend against all wisdom and knowledge, then whatever devil worshipers gain political power can do no ill. You are a moron.

      Delete
    5. Ucadia, what scripture are you relying on in support of your assertion that "states" are vested with authority from God? Romans 13 concerns ecclesiastical government so we know it is not that. So what else?

      Delete
  3. There are a lot of court cases that say the people are sovereign in this country. Here are just three of them. If you want to say something stupid, you came to the wrong place. You must be an idiot or a government troll, which is the same thing. “The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are synonymous terms and mean the same thing. They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions form the sovereignty, and who hold the power, and conduct the government through their representatives. They are what we familiarly call the sovereign people, and every citizen is one of these people, and a constituent member of the sovereignty.” Dredd Scott v Sandford 60 U.S. 393
    "The people or sovereign are not bound by general words in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign,.." People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825)
    "...at the revolution the Sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country... the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, at pg 471

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Notice in Chisholm that "people" are declared to be sovereign, but "citizens" are joint tenants in the peoples' sovereignty. The court was making a distinction. Art IV of the Articles of Confederacy and Perpetual Union identifies two classes of people: citizens and free jnhabitants.

      Delete
  4. God does not give any earthly government its authority or back any one of man's government creation. That's why the Kingdom of God is no part of this world. This system of world governments was created by Satan and his demons. Ephesians 6:11,12 “Put on the complete suit of armor from God that you may be able to stand firm against the machinations of the Devil; because we have a wrestling, not against blood and flesh, but against the governments, against the authorities, against the world rulers of this darkness, against the wicked spirit forces in the heavenly places.” Our court system is definitely a dark place with world rulers of this darkness.
    The Devil owns all the governments of the world: Matthew 4: 8, 9 “Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory, and he said to him: “All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me.” And it is clear to anyone who can think, that you can’t give something that is not yours to give. This is again shown at 1 John 5:19 “We know we originate with God, but the whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one.” And at John 14:30 the Devil is called “the ruler of the world.”
    You make statements with nothing to back them up, so just go away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mike Williams, well said. I agree. I wish more people knew God's word as you do. It would eliminate much confusion.

      Delete
  5. Defending the Masonic? Follow the money(England) then where?. This is fairly easy to do. Do not be lazy.
    If they have alters. What are they? If they refer to one another as Grand Master, who do they serve? How many are within your 'organised' churches? How many lead your organised churches?
    Tis time to seek the True Church.
    i am sure there are those who are within these groups who have (good intentions.) Or those who are ignorant( as Anna is fond of saying).
    There were warnings throughout history of Illuminati infiltration.
    What are the origins of these groups? Are the roots diseased? There were also many warnings from our founders on Catholic infiltration. Does any one remember why people fled to the americas? And yes the evil followed, it always does.

    ReplyDelete
  6. https://archive.org/stream/The_Holy_Order_Of_The_Grand_High_Priest_1879/The_Holy_Order_Of_The_Grand_High_Priest_1879_djvu.txt

    ReplyDelete
  7. Another old woman crazy comment as not one thing stated here can be proven no matter how hard crazy ann wants her hubby to be the "hereditary/lawful/whatever" Sec. of State!!! The great seal has to do with Heraldry symbols and her hubby's family does not have the patent on these symbols and it CANNNOT be proven that they decided to copy Belcher's Coat of Arms!!! Now the past article statement went from "looks like they copied it" to now it is stated as fact "they chose to copy it: as if they had no other symbols to copy!!! Hogwash!!! All you toadies on this site can hop up and down on these lies all you want but until it is PROVEN by historical fact and not the ramblings of 2 crazy people I am not buying this hogwash!!! Talk about "stinky shinola" this article is a big whiff of it!!! She just discounted everything else she posted by posting this lying crazy tripe!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. amen. you sound like someone i know from Alaska, L.B., yes?

      Delete
  8. I'm glad to see some others are waking up to Anna's true agenda!

    Well, here we go again. Anna spins another yarn intended to make as many brain dead readers as possible accept her hubby's ridiculous claim to the throne of the States of the American union of states/States.

    First question: When and where was that throne established? (Answer: It wasn't!) Next question: Did Anna actually think that no one would look it up? Quote from the article: "If you look up the most common rendition of the Belcher Coat of Arms you will see for yourselves that it is the foundation of the Great Seal of The United States of America, and if you look up the actual Great Seal of the Unit­ed States you will see that it is simply an enclosed/encircled version of the same design." (Answer: Probably not.) I spent a lot of time "looking it up" simply because i thought there must be some example of king Jim­my's family crest with a modicum of resem­blance to the USA Great Seal, but i found none, with or without a circle. There were a couple with eagles' heads, but none with any similarity to either of the Great Seals, de jure or de facto. I did find a couple of pup­py dogs and one with three pretty fierce look­ing pigeons! In fact, the only thing i found "most common" among the various "rendi­tions of the Belcher Coat of Arms" was that not one of them resembled the Great Seal in any way.

    Next question: Where exactly does one find such a rendition that Anna so smugly sug­gests is easily found to be "most common"? (Answer: ask Anna)

    OK, final question: Why does Anna go to such lengths to make us think the Founding Fathers were afraid to enter the scary world of international relations without the brav­ery and comfort afforded to them by Jimmy Belcher's ancestors?

    Answer (this one is important): It's what she is implying by this quote: "Because it refers to the unrestricted and unlimited international powers granted by the States to The Unit­ed States of America in 1776."

    Answer translated: The unseen and unknown Belcher family coat of arms, containing no circle, alleged to not only exist but to be the "most common rendition", was used as the basis for the Great Seal of The United States of America, also containing no circles!

    Obvious intended conclusion: The true intent of the Founding Fathers was to establish an ever­lasting kingdom for the Belcher family to rule over the frightened little States of America that were and apparently still are filled with silly simple minded people, who will believe anything if it's wrapped in shiny paper and tied with a really pretty bow!

    One more additional thought: Referring to the last quote above, Anna must have been feeling a bit giddy when she wrote that one. I can imagine how she must squirm when­ever she thinks about sitting next to king Jimmy Belcher, her beloved husband, with "unrestricted and unlimited international powers"! It's enough to give a wannabe queen palpitations of the heart, but in her excitement, she got her history a bit mixed up. There were no powers of any kind given to The United States of America in 1776. Such powers were never given in The Articles of Confederation, which is when The USA was created, and that was in 1781! Such powers were not even given in the Constitution FOR the United States of America, which was presented to the States in 1787 and finally ratified with the inclusion of The Bill of Rights in 1791. In fact, the only Constitutional powers ever given the entity in question are enumerated in Article 1 Section 8, and just to be sure there would never be any question as to any suggestion of "unrestricted and unlimited ... powers", Article 10 of The Bill of Rights makes it very very clear where all powers not specifically vested in the government are resident: In the People!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for asking the same questions I had. Hopefully some verifiable answers will be forthcoming.

      Delete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What if you don't live in your home state and use General Delivery?

    ReplyDelete
  11. C.Johnson, the people of the several states are "American nationals." They are mentioned only once in the United States Code, at 8 USC 1502. A "U.S. National" owes allegiance to the United States. An American mational does not, as it is a constituent of the sovereignty.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.