Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Saturday, June 30, 2018

More "Masonic Conspiracy" Bushwah


By Anna Von Reitz

More "Masonic Conspiracy" Bushwah

People never cease to amaze me with their capacity for missing essential information and facts that are literally "right before their eyes".


The Great Seal of the United States, as you can already clearly see, is always surrounded by what? A circle.

Why?

Because the Federal United States to which this seal refers operates under what?

Delegated Powers.

The circle announces to the world that the entity being represented is operating under delegated sovereignty.

So, the issue is not the design of The Great Seal of the United States, but the design of the actual sovereign seal, which is The Great Seal of the United States of America.

The Great Seal of the United States of America always appears without a circle around it.

Why?

Because it refers to the unrestricted and unlimited international powers granted by the States to The United States of America in 1776.

As I have explained before, the States had need of mutual combined representation in international affairs immediately after the Declaration.

Under international law at that time, they had to have a sovereign to sponsor and underwrite their operations in international jurisdiction.

They chose to operate The United States of America under the Coat of Arms of William Belcher, a Colonel in the Continental Army, who was already a "sovereign in his own right" in England as a result of the Norman Conquest.

If you look up the most common rendition of the Belcher Coat of Arms you will see for yourselves that it is the foundation of the Great Seal of The United States of America, and if you look up the actual Great Seal of the United States you will see that it is simply an enclosed/encircled version of the same design.

All the discussions and artistic efforts and druthers and designs of the Freemasons in Congress, and whether or not they wanted a phoenix represented or an eagle, is all consigned to the dust bin of other Congressional designs in general.

The actual symbol on the both Great Seals is undeniably and actually an American Bald Eagle, and that, too, is apparent to anyone who cares to open up their eyes and look -- instead of indulging themselves in ugly and convoluted fantasies and questionable "supposes" about the motivations, intentions, and desires of men who have been dead for over two centuries.

The facts and the Seals --- both of them --- speak for themselves.

It was ultimately decided that the "Federal United States" had to conform to the source of its "Delegated Power" --- The United States of America, so both Great Seals are identical, except that one is enclosed by a circle, and the other is not.


----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

33 comments:

  1. The people are not Sovereign. God is. The states are vested with authority from God. Not from the people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go away, PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    2. Again with these delegates powers....!! Are we going to be hammered over the head with these ridiculous 19 delegations of treason forever....!! Trash the constitution and let's start over...!! fact, it's time to re-claim our "INDEPEDANCE " again..!!

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Frank O'Collins is definitely a servant of "God". Is. 65:11 identifies God and Mene as the Babylonian deities the Israelites were guilty of serving. Hint: troop and number are their names hidden by deceitful translators. You want to quibble about delegated vs. vested? Absurd hairs to split! If states or States are vested with authority from the Creator(s) and NOT the people, as you contend against all wisdom and knowledge, then whatever devil worshipers gain political power can do no ill. You are a moron.

      Delete
    5. Ucadia, what scripture are you relying on in support of your assertion that "states" are vested with authority from God? Romans 13 concerns ecclesiastical government so we know it is not that. So what else?

      Delete
  2. There are a lot of court cases that say the people are sovereign in this country. Here are just three of them. If you want to say something stupid, you came to the wrong place. You must be an idiot or a government troll, which is the same thing. “The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are synonymous terms and mean the same thing. They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions form the sovereignty, and who hold the power, and conduct the government through their representatives. They are what we familiarly call the sovereign people, and every citizen is one of these people, and a constituent member of the sovereignty.” Dredd Scott v Sandford 60 U.S. 393
    "The people or sovereign are not bound by general words in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign,.." People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825)
    "...at the revolution the Sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country... the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, at pg 471

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Notice in Chisholm that "people" are declared to be sovereign, but "citizens" are joint tenants in the peoples' sovereignty. The court was making a distinction. Art IV of the Articles of Confederacy and Perpetual Union identifies two classes of people: citizens and free jnhabitants.

      Delete
    2. the citizens of America qutoe from chisholm v georgia. The problem is the courts make it clear who the sovereigns are, but the People do not pay attention. People who maintain US Citizenship status, have no standing to claim rights in court, because they don't have any.

      Delete
  3. God does not give any earthly government its authority or back any one of man's government creation. That's why the Kingdom of God is no part of this world. This system of world governments was created by Satan and his demons. Ephesians 6:11,12 “Put on the complete suit of armor from God that you may be able to stand firm against the machinations of the Devil; because we have a wrestling, not against blood and flesh, but against the governments, against the authorities, against the world rulers of this darkness, against the wicked spirit forces in the heavenly places.” Our court system is definitely a dark place with world rulers of this darkness.
    The Devil owns all the governments of the world: Matthew 4: 8, 9 “Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory, and he said to him: “All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me.” And it is clear to anyone who can think, that you can’t give something that is not yours to give. This is again shown at 1 John 5:19 “We know we originate with God, but the whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one.” And at John 14:30 the Devil is called “the ruler of the world.”
    You make statements with nothing to back them up, so just go away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mike Williams, well said. I agree. I wish more people knew God's word as you do. It would eliminate much confusion.

      Delete
  4. Defending the Masonic? Follow the money(England) then where?. This is fairly easy to do. Do not be lazy.
    If they have alters. What are they? If they refer to one another as Grand Master, who do they serve? How many are within your 'organised' churches? How many lead your organised churches?
    Tis time to seek the True Church.
    i am sure there are those who are within these groups who have (good intentions.) Or those who are ignorant( as Anna is fond of saying).
    There were warnings throughout history of Illuminati infiltration.
    What are the origins of these groups? Are the roots diseased? There were also many warnings from our founders on Catholic infiltration. Does any one remember why people fled to the americas? And yes the evil followed, it always does.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. a follower, I'm celebrating today: ONE NATION (America) UNDER GOD (not the U.S. that is under the Vatican and British Empire) INDIVISIBLE (as ONE WITH ALL WHO MAKE THIS CELEBRATION WITH ME) with liberty and justice FOR ALL! I celebrate our independence from the unrighteous rule of the Vatican and the British Empire. And may more Americans this year wake up and come home, to the ONE NATION UNDER GOD!

      Delete
  5. https://archive.org/stream/The_Holy_Order_Of_The_Grand_High_Priest_1879/The_Holy_Order_Of_The_Grand_High_Priest_1879_djvu.txt

    ReplyDelete
  6. Another old woman crazy comment as not one thing stated here can be proven no matter how hard crazy ann wants her hubby to be the "hereditary/lawful/whatever" Sec. of State!!! The great seal has to do with Heraldry symbols and her hubby's family does not have the patent on these symbols and it CANNNOT be proven that they decided to copy Belcher's Coat of Arms!!! Now the past article statement went from "looks like they copied it" to now it is stated as fact "they chose to copy it: as if they had no other symbols to copy!!! Hogwash!!! All you toadies on this site can hop up and down on these lies all you want but until it is PROVEN by historical fact and not the ramblings of 2 crazy people I am not buying this hogwash!!! Talk about "stinky shinola" this article is a big whiff of it!!! She just discounted everything else she posted by posting this lying crazy tripe!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. amen. you sound like someone i know from Alaska, L.B., yes?

      Delete
  7. I'm glad to see some others are waking up to Anna's true agenda!

    Well, here we go again. Anna spins another yarn intended to make as many brain dead readers as possible accept her hubby's ridiculous claim to the throne of the States of the American union of states/States.

    First question: When and where was that throne established? (Answer: It wasn't!) Next question: Did Anna actually think that no one would look it up? Quote from the article: "If you look up the most common rendition of the Belcher Coat of Arms you will see for yourselves that it is the foundation of the Great Seal of The United States of America, and if you look up the actual Great Seal of the Unit­ed States you will see that it is simply an enclosed/encircled version of the same design." (Answer: Probably not.) I spent a lot of time "looking it up" simply because i thought there must be some example of king Jim­my's family crest with a modicum of resem­blance to the USA Great Seal, but i found none, with or without a circle. There were a couple with eagles' heads, but none with any similarity to either of the Great Seals, de jure or de facto. I did find a couple of pup­py dogs and one with three pretty fierce look­ing pigeons! In fact, the only thing i found "most common" among the various "rendi­tions of the Belcher Coat of Arms" was that not one of them resembled the Great Seal in any way.

    Next question: Where exactly does one find such a rendition that Anna so smugly sug­gests is easily found to be "most common"? (Answer: ask Anna)

    OK, final question: Why does Anna go to such lengths to make us think the Founding Fathers were afraid to enter the scary world of international relations without the brav­ery and comfort afforded to them by Jimmy Belcher's ancestors?

    Answer (this one is important): It's what she is implying by this quote: "Because it refers to the unrestricted and unlimited international powers granted by the States to The Unit­ed States of America in 1776."

    Answer translated: The unseen and unknown Belcher family coat of arms, containing no circle, alleged to not only exist but to be the "most common rendition", was used as the basis for the Great Seal of The United States of America, also containing no circles!

    Obvious intended conclusion: The true intent of the Founding Fathers was to establish an ever­lasting kingdom for the Belcher family to rule over the frightened little States of America that were and apparently still are filled with silly simple minded people, who will believe anything if it's wrapped in shiny paper and tied with a really pretty bow!

    One more additional thought: Referring to the last quote above, Anna must have been feeling a bit giddy when she wrote that one. I can imagine how she must squirm when­ever she thinks about sitting next to king Jimmy Belcher, her beloved husband, with "unrestricted and unlimited international powers"! It's enough to give a wannabe queen palpitations of the heart, but in her excitement, she got her history a bit mixed up. There were no powers of any kind given to The United States of America in 1776. Such powers were never given in The Articles of Confederation, which is when The USA was created, and that was in 1781! Such powers were not even given in the Constitution FOR the United States of America, which was presented to the States in 1787 and finally ratified with the inclusion of The Bill of Rights in 1791. In fact, the only Constitutional powers ever given the entity in question are enumerated in Article 1 Section 8, and just to be sure there would never be any question as to any suggestion of "unrestricted and unlimited ... powers", Article 10 of The Bill of Rights makes it very very clear where all powers not specifically vested in the government are resident: In the People!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for asking the same questions I had. Hopefully some verifiable answers will be forthcoming.

      Delete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here's a great article about how law plays out in America. Anna is playing fully in the NON-DOMESTIC ARENA. It is in the international law DE JURE). when people fully realize their own non-domestic status, they will be able once again to use their de jure laws and status and standing again, too. the issue is, we have so many shill fear mongers who are working diligently to keep people in the de facto domestic status and standing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_law
    GEORGE WASHINGTON-BRITISH LOYALIST set up federal district states, over the top of our 50 several states. He did this as the beginning of taking authority over the people and giving back to the King of England. (TRUE HISTORY). These 12 states (districts) are known as DOMESTIC STATES, the 50 states (sovereigns) are known as non-domestic. the 12 district/domestic/states are not sovereign and are not these several States. The fed. reserve has banks in all these 12 states. The Supreme Court ruled, whenever the NON-domestic states are included in writing of laws, rules or regulations, they have a name and that name must be used in the writing, if the writing is address jurisdiction of the laws, rules or regs. to them. The name of the non-domestic states, that must be used is 'SEVERAL STATES'. If that name is not used, the law,rule or reg has nothing to do with the people of those several states or these several states. How often are laws, rules, regs, written for the several states? almost never! the several states and the people who owe their allegiance to them are the de jure govt and are known as U.S. NATIONALS and AMERICAN....STATE....NATIONALS. Why because they are from the nation of american (non-U.S. STATES/DISTRICTS). Here's the picture of the district states: http://hamilton-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/structure_figure_1.3.jpg the UNITED STATES, INC, is made up of: these district states, dc and the territories: when speaking of the U.S. geographically. As you can see, the U.S.INC, is not our country. Our COUNTRY IS THE NATION OF 50 STATES UNITED, these united States for America. Your home country is actually your home state, united with 49 others makes up the nation (non-domestic). If you live in your home state, you are not a resident of the U.S., you don't live in any of the U.S. ZIP CODES, for it domestic/district states. This is why, you should only use Post Offices in your area and not USPS. USPS is trying to shut down POST OFFICES, don't let them. Keep our non-domestic, American mail system alive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ps. everyone can change everything from domestic to non-domestic concerning their own lives, or they can have some in domestic and some non-domestic. it's all in how you use your identitites (names) and for the purposes of your own lives by your POA. right now, if you haven't done ANNA'S paperwork than you are domestic U.S. CITIZEN.

      Delete
    2. What if you don't live in your home state and use General Delivery?

      Delete
    3. michael, great question. We have to read USC TITLE 8 and understand it. Here is the legal definition of the United States in that title:
      United States
      (38)The term “United States”, except as otherwise specifically herein provided, when used in a geographical sense, means the "CONTINENTAL" United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
      NOW, here is the legal definition of Continental: Continental United States Law and Legal Definition
      "Continental United States" includes “the several States and the District of Columbia, but does not include Alaska or Hawaii.” (5 USCS § 5701). Now, Alaska and Hawaii are not included in this definition because geographically they are not on the continent.
      So take that definition and see if any of the 50 states are left out, when it comes to title 8. NO! ALL STATES, TERRITORIES AND DISTRICTS ARE INCLUDED. EVERYTHING.
      Now comes your dual citizenship: 8 U.S. Code § 1401 - Nationals and citizens of United States at birth
      The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States AT BIRTH:(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
      Do you understand you are a NATIONAL AND A U.S. CITIZEN by birth in the U.S.? If you don't understand that, don't go any farther with this comment until you do. Because the rest of my comment, is based on your understanding.
      So you have dual citizenship. However there are people who do not have dual citizenship, they are nationals but not citizens. Who are these people: residents of the US territories they are found in title 8-1408, those territorial nationals are Samoa and Swains Island. They do not have dual citizenship, they are nationals only.


      Delete
    4. So let's come back to our dual citizenship 'AT BIRTH'. what occurred AT BIRTH. A nativity of a NATIONAL, on the land of a several State. Since the United States is the service company to Nationals, you had a benefit/privilege by right of birth. That benefit/privilege was the right to U.S.CITIZENSHIP, which no one, not even your parents could deny you. (Thus the forced birth certificates at the hospital and the child PROTECTIVE [what a laugh] services.) That right is protected by the U.S. as their service to you a NATIONAL. So you get a U.S. B/C showing your are entitled to their service. That citizenship is conveyed to you, as proof they owe you service. It is your proof of rights to service. Your dual citizenship started AT BIRTH. Evidence of it was a few days later when B/C was issued. So now that you are at the age of maturity, you can decide if you want to continue with dual citizenship or not. If not, you can drop the U.S.Citizenship and keep the National part. The National part applies if you are domiciled within anyone of the 50 several states. The U.S. part is the jurisdiction within the 50 several states. So if you drop the U.S. part you lose the beginning subject part of above title section. You become a NATIONAL only. Then you can do this: “Certificates of Non Citizen Nationality The Department of State occasionally receives requests for certificates of non-citizen national status pursuant to Section 341(b)of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 USC 1452(b). You cannot get that certificate as long as you remain a U.S.citizen. Your B/C naturalized you (YOU WERE NOT A NATURAL CITIZEN OF THE U.S.) Now, what John Kerry decided to do instead of issuing certificates was to authorize U.S. National passports, where you don't use SS#. He did that, to cover the law demanding certificate. I have given on other posts where and how to apply for that passport, you don't do it at a post office. There are special centers. As the title of the certificate indicates, only a person who is a non-citizen U.S. national (i.e., a U.S. national but not a U.S. citizen) may apply for such a certificate”. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/us-citizenship/Certificates-Non-Citizen-Nationality.html
      How did your dual citizenship happen? By legislative acts of Congress, in passing the above titles. Do you ask for that? Did you want it? Did you give you freewill with full disclosure consent to it? If you don’t want U.S. CITIZENSHIP along with your National Citizenship and you are over 21 (age of maturity), then drop it. It is you right within the laws of this country to your Nationality. Once you drop it, then write the state department, send them copies of your paperwork and tell them you want your certificate or passport as a National, non-U.S. Citizen. Don’t even say, U.S. National (even though you are because they have more duty to NATIONALS than CITIZENS, and they fail at it all) it does not matter. The only thing you want is your National standing and status. Then for banking and employment you are only required to show the passport as a “non-resident alien” exempt from any U.S. demands by administrative laws and procedures.
      You can do whatever you want, but hopefully you can understand your options. Everyone needs to study U.S.C. TITLE 8, if you get any flack remember this: 8 U.S. Code § 1503, and this USC 18-242 and 18 USC Ch. 47. REMEMBER ALL STATUTES WITHIN USC INCLUDE NATIONALS AND US TITLES EXCLUDE NATIONALS. As Nationals non-us citizens, use the right statutes, pertaining to your situation.

      Delete
    5. MICHAEL: you are zip code exempt. you don't have to use general delivery. You can use your rural route minus zip code. or you use your regular address, just make it c/o by writing c/o before it, then its only a mailing address. or you can write in parathesis 'WITHOUT THE U.S., write that where the zip code goes If they want my home NON MAILING address I write: rural route, street info and then in parathesis 'without the u.s in place of writing the zip code. Its the zip code that id's a place resident or business as being within the U.S. Its one thing to have a mailing address in the U.S. but residency for nationals must be within the nation. zip code determines jurisdiction.

      Delete
    6. C.Johnson, the people of the several states are "American nationals." They are mentioned only once in the United States Code, at 8 USC 1502. A "U.S. National" owes allegiance to the United States. An American mational does not, as it is a constituent of the sovereignty.

      Delete
    7. Joseph A. go back and read the definition of U.S.! When you see the DUAL citizenship, you see U.S. NATIONAL AND U.S. CITIZEN. Why if you will read the definition in title 8 they are both subject to the United States. NOT UNITED STATES. United States throughout title 8 includes persons born on the continent and the land of hawaii and alaska. Now, if you have read any of my comments about statutes, you will have read USC TITLES always included us, some how some way. But, US titles and UCC do not ever include us. US titles and UCC is US citizen-person only. title 8 includes us in the dual citizenship. it also includes 2 of the territories as U.S. Nationals. Then it also talks about Nationals-that's us without the US CITIZENSHIP. Go back and read my comments on July 4, to Michael on this thread. If you don't understand the definition of United States and how its used in this title you will be confused. You must understand, there is US AND USC JURISDICTION. US is not the only jurisdiction it is the most inferior.

      Delete
    8. I agree with you about owing allegiance. But, nationals owe allegiance to a state and to the United States as a continent. But, not to the UNITED STATES.

      Delete
    9. National means a citizen of the continent and hawaii and alaska by the way and that geographical are is the United States (not UNITED STATES).

      Delete
    10. let me make this very simple: with B/C just understand you are a US NATIONAL AND US CITIZEN. Persons born in Samoa and Swains Island are not U.S. Citizens, they are U.S. Nationals ONLY. Persons born in DC and other district territories are U.S. Citizens. We the ones born in America are the only ones who are both. Now, if you drop the U.S. CITIZEN PART, you are still a U.S. NATIONAL. You are not expat from the laws of U.S. NATIONAL. IE...passport, tax exempt status, etc....! However, by dropping the U.S. Citizen part, you also return to your full standing of AMERICAN STATE NATIONAL. But, for the comfort for everyone, just use the LEGAL term: National, non-U.S.CITIZEN. You can even use the LEGAL TERM: American National and that might even be better to distinguish yourself from U.S. Citizen. But, regardless you are an America from an American State and that makes you a National. That's USC TITLE 8 in a nutshell.

      Delete
  10. This video is so important for understanding how dual citizenship is capturing us all. The guy in this video has everything right, he has nothing to prove to the court he is not a dual citizen. In the court he is a dual citizenship because of USC title 8. The court knows this and they are laying claim, because of his dual citizenship. US CITIZENS have no rights. They are ASSUMING JURISDICTION, because of the dual citizenship. Now, he's making argument in the court and that is evidence of jurisdiction. If he only had ANNA'S forms in place, he could have stopped all this because everything to show no US JURISDICTION, would have been on and for the record. Here's the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKG0wUJWbcI That is why Anna has been telling everyone, do the paperwork, then take it to court sealed or lay it out on the bible. That paperwork, shows there is no jurisdiction by US COURTS, IT MOVES EVERYTHING TO USC (ARTICLE 3 Jurisdiction). The guy in this video has no rights of USC JURISDICTION. He has to keep arguing in US article 1, because that is where he is a citizen. He is trying to use the rights of an American, while he's still standing in US CITIZENSHIP STATUS. It can't be done! He is not a citizen of his state, he is still on the record a US CITIZEN. He never changed the record.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.