Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Tuesday, May 29, 2018

Official Private and Public Notice


By Anna Von Reitz

As promised, we have issued the official Public and Private Notice in objection to the settlement of the CANADA bankruptcy and the improper assumption of American assets by Prince Philip.  We have also demanded the return of our escheated names and estates and the formal end of the abeyance created by the General Orders 100. 


See attached/posted Notice: 





27 comments:

  1. I'm not a lawyer but don't a 'Notice of Objection' and a demand letter fall well short of an actual lawsuit? Is there anything preventing one for filing an actual lawsuit?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kills plausible denial at every level. Enforcement is a big issue.

    ReplyDelete
  3. questionfortruth.....Yes, an actual law suit would also bring light to the fraud being perpetuated right now all over the world....But it takes a commitment from all of us to stick together in a class action suit, so none of us are targeted individually by the Corp STATE...!! And I don't think it should involve money on our part to bring the claim, because as American non citizen Nationals, we only use "lawful money" and not private script, fiat paper...!! I am starting to put right on the face of a complaint lately, that "filing fees are automatically waived because of the nature of the charges...!! But we have to find different courts to bring our complaints to that is unbiased, if that is even possible, if we ever hope to get a REMEDY...!! Anna made them aware of the fraud, but she never initiated a law suit...!! Any one of us can initiate a law suit, even in the Hague...!! So I have no idea what Anna is talking about when she says she can't do it because of some sort of "conflict of interest"...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James, as Anna already addressed and explained to you specifically, you cannot be part of a class action lawsuit until you are a non-citizen state national so you can part of that class. Where do you stand on the record with your paperwork?

      Delete
    2. 1Free, I don't think james is talking about himself, but his question is one In General. So let me also ask, 'what does anna mean when she says a law suit cannot be initiated due to 'conflict of interest'?
      Never mind what anyone's status is at the moment; some people want to know first what advantage is it to take action on their status.

      Delete
    3. Abby, if Anna were to file a class action suit, no US citizen would be able to participate. It would only be for NCSNs. Since neither you nor James have done any of your paperwork to expatriate your US citizen status, if either of you were to join in on this suit, that would be a major conflict of interest. The other point that Anna made was the fact that if enough Americans would simply change their status, there would be no need for a class action lawsuit because as NCSNs, we are not a class but each individual sovereigns. We would only need to get together and decree what must happen. This is along the lines of the 32 states assembling to form a continental congress.

      Delete
    4. PS: Abby if you don't know by now what advantage there is to take action on your status, then what on earth are you doing here on this blog?

      Delete
    5. 1Free, its about enforcement. Enforcement. Nobody seems to know how to enforce any such Status. And as often as that question has been asked, it has never been answered.

      Even after a status change, there still seems to be the same hurdles just the same as before; having to fight to get benefit of such new status. There still seems to be the hassle of 'having to know how to handle this status in the event of one ends up being hauled into court'.

      It just does not seem that changing our status ends much of anything. You asked, so I'm telling ya, lol.

      Delete
    6. O yes it has, Abby. Many times. But you don't like the answer. You have it all backwards. If you are looking for someone else to enforce it for you, then you will be waiting for a very long time. Go look in the mirror. That is who is going to enforce it. Or not. You are your own enforcer. But you must choose to do so if you claim to be a sovereign. And yes, it takes study and it takes work and a lot of it. But most importantly, it takes putting it into practice. But please, don't trouble yourself. It is obvious that sovereignty and individual responsibility is not for you. If you have not done anything to correct your status by now, after all these years on this blog, you never will. And no, I did not ask you anything except why you are even on this blog. Why would I ask someone with zero ambition to effectuate anything about the advantage of changing your status? But I will repeat my question, why are you even on this blog when you question everything and don't accomplish anything?

      Delete
    7. 1Free, is it not our own individual business what we choose to do, according to what we see fit to do? Is it really your place to try to make carbon copies of yourself? I happen to have very valid reasons for why I have not done what You think I should do, but I am not bound to explain my reasons to you or anyone else. And as for why am I here? Because I can, thats why. And I will ask you, why do you need to know?

      Delete
    8. @1FreeMan, I think you over extended on Abby. One needs to find a court that will hear the case and even with the status at this time, have anything enforced if successful in court. There are just too many crooked Judges and not enough Justices of the Peace right now.

      Delete
    9. Abby...don't even waste your energy on these crazies.
      Lol

      Delete
  4. Here is a hero of mine from grade school now Minnesota super lawyer. Maybe he has an opinion to offer��

    https://minnlawyer.com/2018/02/08/attorneys-of-the-year-robert-bennett/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leland, if he carries a BAR card, then he is part of the problem, not the solution. And unless and until he resigns and surrenders his BAR card, and becomes a real Counselor at Constitutional Law instead of being an attorney at statutory codes, which is not law, he is the opposition.

      Delete
    2. Perhaps I should have posted my comment as a reply here..."

      questfortruth9May 29, 2018 at 4:22 PM
      I'm not a lawyer but don't a 'Notice of Objection' and a demand letter fall well short of an actual lawsuit? Is there anything preventing one for filing an actual lawsuit?"

      Delete
  5. Can someone please point me in the direction to where the proof is that Canada went broke? I am from Canada, where is this information?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All that stuff is done behind the scenes. You can bet Justin and gang know about it. One would have to check out "The Gazette" going back to last year. There is likely a small print note in there. Also it might be in the UCC data. I am from Ontario and have been following Anna for a while now. The One People's Public Trust also foreclosed on all IMF/Fed Reserve/SEC Incorporated corporations in 2012 via UCC. The banksters and affiliates are just ignoring the law.

      Delete
  6. OK so "annuities" are basically yearly profit/interest payments to the bond holders , 950Trillion in profits ? whats the actual principle amount then of the bonds ? and that means Canada bought up over a 100Trillion in US debts ?
    When you pay taxes on your 1040 form your paying an Annuity payment to the bond holders associated with your account.
    When you pay property taxes you are paying your portion of the Bond/loan payments (mostly interest/annuity) for all the loans local government takes out to run itself.

    Anyone looked in Title by Prescription/ Prescriptive Title aka Title by possession.
    See "Prescription", note the very last sentence of part 4.
    http://www.mindserpent.com/American_History/reference/1835_Tomlins/1835_tomlins_law_dictionary_vol_2.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm still hoping for more details how to use Anna's indemnity bond she filed for the states against the land pirates, that Gary Larabee talked about.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Standing up to the evil,good job were with you all the way.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have a suggestion, how about all you toads hopping on Abby SHOW us how all of this is done and get the lawsuit in a court since you know the "proper" documentation and procedures and people like me and Abby don't know anything!!!??? Your ignorance and stupidity is on display for all the world to see because if you know so much, WHY are you on this forum dissing someone else and not leading the way with showing the rest of us HOW IT IS DONE!!!??? Yes, Abby doesn't know this and she doesn't know that, but it look to me that she knows stupidity and ignorance when she sees it and I'm calling a spade a spade and telling all you toadies on this forum to either put up or shut up and SHOW THE REST OF US HOW IT IS REALLY DONE SINCE YOU CLAIM YOU KNOW SO MUCH!!! But...as has been exposed so many times on this forum, Truth is not wanted here, just a bunch of crappy crazy stuff from crazy people. If all of this was the Truth, then explain why this isn't in a court being prosecuted!!!??? "Notices" don't mean a thing and has no enforcement. And how many "notices" is it going to take before they get "scared" into correcting all of this!? Ain't gonna happen!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's a real unknown man,
      Sitting in his unknown land,
      Making all his unknown plans for nobody.

      Delete
  10. 1Freeman has more brain than all of you put together!
    to know Truth from Fiction 99.99% is stumbling on.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.