Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 10,360 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. WHAT THEY WRITE IS THEIR OWN OPINION, just as what I write is my own.


Sunday, December 22, 2024

Fourth Sunday In Advent

 Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's

The Church's Year

On this Sunday the Church redoubles her ardent sighs for the coming of the Redeemer, and, in the Introit, places the longing of the just of the Old Law upon the lips of the faithful, again exhorting them through the gospel of the day, to true penance as the best preparation for the worthy reception of the Savior. Therefore at the Introit she prays:

INTROIT Drop down dew, ye heavens, from above, and let the clouds rain the just (Is. 45). Let the earth be opened, and bud forth a Savior. The heavens show forth the glory of God, and the firmament declareth the work of his hands (Ps. 18:2). Glory be to the Father.

COLLECT Raise up, O Lord, we pray Thee, Thy power, and come, and with great might succor us: that, by the help of Thy grace, that which our sins impede may be hastened by Thy merciful forgiveness. Through our Lord.

EPISTLE (I Cor. 4:1-5). Brethren, Let a man so account of us as of the ministers of Christ, and the dispensers of the mysteries of God. Here now it is required among the dispensers, that a man be found faithful. But to me, it is a very small thing to be judged by you, or by man's day: but neither do I judge my own self. For I am not conscious to myself of anything, yet am I not hereby justified: but he that judgeth me is the Lord. Therefore judge not before the time, until the Lord come: who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then shall every man have praise from God.

Why is this epistle read on this day?

The Church desires by this epistle to impress those who received Holy Orders on Ember Saturday with the dignity of their office, and exhorts them to fill it with becoming fidelity and sanctity, excelling the laity in piety and virtue, as well as in official dignity. She wishes again to remind the faithful of the terrible coming of Christ to judgment, urging them, by purifying their conscience through a contrite confession, to receive Christ at this holy Christmas time, as their Savior, that they may not behold Him, at the Last Day, as their severe judge.

How should the faithful regard the priests and spiritual superiors?

They should esteem and obey them as servants, stewards, and vicars of Christ; as dispensers of the holy mysteries (I Cor. 4:1); as ambassadors of the most High (II Con 5:20). For this reason God earnestly commands honor to priests (Ecclus. 7:31), and Christ says of the Apostles and their successors (Lk. 10:16): Who despiseth you, despiseth me; and St. Paul writes (I Tim. 5:17): Let the priests that rule well be esteemed worthy of double honor: especially they who labor in the word and doctrine.

Can the priest dispense the sacraments according to his own will?

No, he must have power from the Church, and must exercise his office faithfully, in accordance with the orders of the Church, and act according to the will of Christ whose steward he is. The priest dare not give that which is holy to dogs (Mt. 7:6), that is, he is not permitted to give absolution, and administer the sacraments to impenitent persons, under penalty of incurring eternal damnation.

Why does St. Paul consider the judgment of men a small matter?

Because it is usually false, deceptive, foolish, and is consequently not worth seeking or caring for. Man often counts as evil that which is in itself good and, on the contrary, esteems as good that which is evil. St. Paul says: If I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ (Gal. 1:10). Oh, how foolish, and what poor Christians, therefore, are they, who not to displease man, willingly adopt all silly customs, and fashions in dress, manners and appearance, making themselves contemptible to God, the angels, and saints. Recall the beautiful words of the Seraphic St. Francis: "We are, what we are in the sight of God, nothing more"; learn from them to fulfil your duties faithfully, and be indifferent to the judgment of the world and its praise.

Why does not St. Paul wish to judge himself?

Because no one, without a special revelation from heaven, can know if he be just in the sight of God or not, even though his conscience may accuse him of nothing, for "man knoweth not whether he be worthy of love or hatred" (Eccles. 9:1). Thus St. Paul goes on to say, that though he was not conscious of any wrong, he did not judge himself to be justified, God only could decide that. Man should certainly examine himself as much as is in his power, to find if he has anything within him displeasing to God; should he find nothing he must not judge himself more just than others, but consider that the eyes of his mind may be dimmed, and fail to see that which God sees and will reveal to others at the judgment Day. The Pharisees saw no fault in themselves, and were saintly and perfect in their own estimation, yet our Lord cursed them.

ASPIRATION "O Lord, enter not into judgment with Thy servant: for in Thy sight no man living can be justified" (Ps. 142:2).

GOSPEL (Lk. 3:1-6). In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and Philip his brother tetrarch of Iturea and the country of Trachonitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilina, under the high priests Annas and Caiphas: the word of the Lord came to John the son of Zachary in the desert. And he came into all the country about the Jordan, preaching the baptism of penance for the remission of sins, as it is written in the book of the sayings of Isaias the prophet: A voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight. Every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be brought low: the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough ways plain: and all flesh shall see the salvation of God.

Why is the time in which St. John commenced to preach so minutely described?

The Evangelist, contrary to his usual custom, describes the time minutely, and enumerates exactly, in their precise order, the religious and civil princes in office, that, in the first place, it could not be denied that this was truly the time and the year in which the promised Messiah appeared in this world, whom John baptized, and the Heavenly Father declared to be His beloved Son. Furthermore, it shows the fulfillment of the prophecy of the Patriarch Jacob (Gen. 49:10), that when the scepter would be taken away from Juda, that is, when the Jews would have no longer a king from their own tribes, the Savior would come.

What is meant by: "The word of the Lord came to John"?

It means that John was commissioned by divine inspiration, or by an angel sent from God, to preach penance and announce to the world the coming of the Lord. He had prepared himself for this work by a penitential, secluded life, and intercourse with God. We learn from his example not to intrude ourselves into office, least of all into a spiritual office, but to await the call from God, preparing ourselves in solitude and quiet, by fervent prayer and by a holy life, for the necessary light.

What is meant by: "Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight his paths"?

It means that we should prepare our hearts for the worthy reception of Christ, by penance, amendment, and the resolution to lead a pious life in future. To do this, every valley should be filled, that is, all faintheartedness, sloth and cowardice, all worldly carnal sentiments should be elevated and directed to God, the highest Good, by firm confidence and ardent desire for heavenly virtues; the mountains and hills should be brought low, that is, pride, stubbornness, and ambition should be humbled, and the obstinate will be broken. The crooked shall be made straight, that is, ill-gotten goods should be restored, hypocrisy, malice, and double dealing be renounced, and our intentions turned to God and the performance of His holy will. And the rough ways shall be made plain, that is, anger, revenge, and impatience must leave the heart, if the Lamb of God is to dwell therein. It may also signify that the Savior put to shame the pride of the world, and its false wisdom by building His Church upon the Apostles, who, by reason of their poverty and simplicity, may be considered the low valleys, while the way to heaven, formerly so rough and hard to tread, because of the want of grace, is now by His grace made smooth and easy.

ASPIRATION O my Jesus! would that my heart were well prepared and smooth for Thee! Assist me! O my Savior to do that which I cannot do by myself. Make me an humble valley, fill me with Thy grace; turn my crooked and perverted will to Thy pleasure; change my rough and angry disposition, throw away in me whatever impedes Thy way, that Thou mayst come to me without hindrance. Thou alone possess and rule me forever. Amen.

INSTRUCTION ON THE HOLY SACRAMENT OF PENANCE

“Preaching the baptism of penance for the remission of sins"(Lk. 3:3).

What is penance, and how many kinds are there?

Penance, says the Roman Catechism (Cat. Rom. de Pcenit. 54), consists in the turning of our whole soul to God, hating and detesting the crimes we have committed, firmly resolving to amend our lives, its evil habits and corrupt ways, hoping through the mercy of God to obtain pardon. This is interior penance, or the virtue of penance. The sincere acknowledgment of our sins to a priest and the absolution he accords, is exterior penance, or the holy Sacrament of Penance, which Christ instituted (Jn. 20:22-23), through which the sins committed after baptism, are remitted.

Which of these penances is necessary for the forgiveness of sins?

Both are necessary, for unless the conversion of the heart to God, a true consciousness of, and sorrow for sin, the firm purpose of amendment and confidence in God's mercy, precede the confession, declaring all our sins to a priest cannot obtain forgiveness of mortal sin committed after baptism. At the same time a really contrite turning to God, will not, without confession to a priest, obtain forgiveness, except when by circumstances, a person is prevented from approaching the tribunal of penance. Such a person must, however, have the ardent desire to confess as soon as possible.

Can any one who has committed mortal sin be saved without penance?

No, for penance is as necessary to such a one as baptism, if he wishes not to perish: Unless you do penance, says Christ, you shall all likewise perish (Lk. 13:3, 5).

Is this penance performed at once?

This penance is necessary every day of our lives: that is, we must from day to day endeavor to be heartily sorry for our sins, to despise them, to eradicate the roots of sin, that is, our passions and evil inclinations, and become more pleasing to God by penance and good works.

Why do so many die impenitent?

Because they do not accept and use the many graces God offers them, but put off their repentance. If such sinners, like the godless King Antiochus (II Mac. 9) intend to repent on their deathbed for fear of punishment, they usually find that God in His justice will no longer give them the grace of repentance, for he who when he can repent, will not, cannot when he will. "Who will not listen at the time of grace," says St. Gregory, "will not be listened to' in the time of anxiety." And it is to be feared that he who postpones penance until old age, will not find justice where he looked for mercy.

Can all sinners do penance?

With the grace of God all can, even the greatest sinners; as a real father God calls them when He says: As I live ...I desire not the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way, and live. Turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways: and why will ye die, O house of Israel? And the wickedness of the wicked shall not hurt him, in what day soever he shall turn from his wickedness (Ezech. 33:11-12).

Do all who go to confession perform true penance?

Unfortunately they do not; for all is not accomplished with confession. If there is no sincere detestation of sin, no true sorrow for having offended God; if the evil inclinations and bad habits are not overcome, ill-gotten goods restored, and calumny repaired, the occasions of sin avoided; if a sincere amendment of life, or, at least, its earnest purpose does not follow, then indeed, there cannot be the least shadow of true repentance, not even though such persons confess weekly. But alas! we see many such. And why? Because many think repentance consists simply in confession, and not in the amendment of their lives. Only those obtain pardon who are truly penitent, and perform all that is enjoined upon them in confession. It is well, therefore, to read and carefully act according to the following instructions.

 

I. ON THE EXAMINATION OF CONSCIENCE

The foundation of true repentance, interior and exterior (see the preceding pages), is the vivid knowledge of our sins. There are many who are unconscious of the most grievous sins in which they are buried; blinded by self-love they do not even regard them as sins, do not confess them, perform no penance for them and are consequently eternally lost. To prevent this great evil, the Council of Trent (Sess. XIV c.5) ordered a careful examination of conscience before confession, and afterwards to confess the sins which are discovered by that examination.

Why should we examine our conscience?

Because, as St. Ignatius says, no one can become fully aware of his own faults, unless God reveals them by a special light; we should, therefore, first of all, daily ask the Holy Ghost to enlighten us, and should then examine our thoughts, desires, words, actions, and omissions since our last valid confession and how often we have sinned in these respects. To know this, we should let our conscience, that is, the inner voice which tells us what is good and what is evil, speak freely, without flattering ourselves, or passing it by negligently. St. Charles Borromeo says, we should place before our eyes the Ten Commandments of God and carefully compare our life and our morals with them; it is well also to examine ourselves on the seven deadly sins, and remember the places and persons with whom we have been in contact, the duties of our state of life, the vices to which we are most inclined, the consequences that were, or might have been produced upon ourselves or others. At the same time, we should imagine ourselves standing before the judgment seat of God, and whatever would cause us fear there, whatever we could not answer for there, we should look upon as sins, be sorry for, and confess.

Is it a sin not to examine ourselves long and carefully?

Certainly it is a sin for those to examine their consciences carelessly, who live unfaithfully and in mortal sin, and who seldom confess, because they expose themselves frivolously to the danger of leaving out great sins, and consequently they make a sacrilegious confession, committing thereby a new and grievous sin.

Those who daily ask God for enlightenment and examine their conscience at least every evening before going to bed, will prepare themselves properly before approaching the tribunal of penance. "Behold, you have a book in which you write your daily expenses," says St. Chrysostom, "make a book of your conscience, also, and write there your daily sins. Before you go to bed, before sleep comes, take your book, that is, your conscience, and recall your sins, whether of thought, word, or deed. Say then to your soul: Again, O my soul, a day is spent, what have we done of evil or of good? If you have accomplished some good, be grateful to God; if evil, resolve to avoid it for the future. Shed tears in remembrance of your sins; ask forgiveness of God, and then let your body sleep."

II. ON CONTRITION

"O man," cries St. Augustine, "why dost thou weep over the body whence the soul has departed, and not over the soul from which God has withdrawn?" The idolatrous Michas (Judg. 18:23-24) complained bitterly, because his idols were taken from him; Esau grieved greatly over the loss of his birthright and his father's blessing (Gen. 27:34). Should we not therefore, be filled with sorrow, when by our sins we have lost God and Heaven?

What is contrition, and how many kinds are there?

"Contrition is a hearty sorrow and detestation of our sins, with a firm purpose of sinning no more" (Conc. Trid., Sess. XIV, can. 4). If this grief and detestation comes from a temporal injury, shame or punishment, it is a natural sorrow; but if we are sorry for our sins, because by them we have offended God, and transgressed His holy law, it is a supernatural sorrow; this, again, is imperfect when fear of God's punishment is the motive; it is perfect, if we are sorry for our sins, because we have offended God, the supreme Lord and best of Fathers.

Is natural sorrow sufficient for a good confession?

It is not, because it proceeds not from a supernatural motive, but from the love or fear of the world. A mere natural sorrow for our sins worketh death (II Cor. 7:10). If one confess his sins having only a natural sorrow for them, he commits a sacrilege, because the most necessary part of the Sacrament of Penance in wanting.

What other qualities are necessary for a true contrition?

Contrition should be interior, proceeding from the heart and not merely from the lips; it must be universal, that is, it must extend to all the mortal sins which the sinner has committed; it must be sovereign, that is, he must be more sorry for having offended God, than for any temporal evil; it must be supernatural, that is, produced in the heart by supernatural motives; namely, because we have offended God, lost His grace, deserved hell, etc.

What kind of sorrow must we have in order to obtain forgiveness of our sins?

That sorrow which proceeds from a perfect love of God, and not from fear of temporal or eternal punishment. This perfect contrition would suffice for the forgiveness of sins, if in case of danger of death, there should be a great desire, but no opportunity to confess to a priest. But the Holy Catholic Church has declared (Conc. Trid., Sess. XIV, can. 4) the imperfect contrition which proceeds from the fear of eternal punishment to be sufficient for the valid reception of the holy Sacrament of Penance.

Who are those who have reason to fear they have aroused only a natural sorrow for their sins?

Those who care little about knowing what true sorrow is; those who often commit grievous sins, and do not amend their lives; for if true sorrow for sin had been excited in their hearts, with the firm purpose of amendment, the grace of God in this Sacrament would have strengthened the resolution, and enabled them to avoid sin, at least for a time. On account of their immediate relapse we justly doubt whether they have validly received the sacrament of penance and its sanctifying grace.

How can the sinner attain true sorrow?

The sinner can attain true sorrow by the grace of God and his own co-operation. That both are necessary is shown by the prophet Jeremias (jet. 31:18-19), who prays: Convert me, O Lord, and I shall be converted: for Thou art the Lord, my God. For after Thou didst convert me, I did penance: and after Thou didst skew unto me, I struck my thigh (with sorrow). To which God replies: If thou wilt be converted, I will convert thee Qer. 15:19). We see, therefore, that the first and most essential means for producing this sorrow is the grace of God. It must begin and complete the work of conversion, but it will do this only when the sinner earnestly and faithfully co-operates. When God in whatever way has admonished the sinner that he should be converted, let him ardently implore God for the grace of a true conversion, invoke the intercession of the Mother of the Savior, his guardian angel, and like the holy penitents, David, Peter, and Magdalen, let him meditate upon the truth that God is a just judge, who hates sin, and will punish it in the eternal torments of hell. Having placed these truths vividly before his eyes, the sinner will reflect further whether by his sins he has not himself deserved this punishment, and if by the enlightenment of God he finds he has, he will also see the danger in which he stands, that if God should permit him to die impenitent, he would have to suffer forever in hell. This fear of eternal punishment urges the sinner to hope in God's mercy; for He wishes not the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way and live; again, our Redeemer says: I came to call the sinner to repentance, and, there is more joy in heaven over one sinner who does penance, than over ninety-nine just. He considers the patience of God towards him, the graces bestowed upon him during his sinful life; namely his creation, redemption, sanctification in baptism, and many others. He will now contemplate the beauty and perfection of God: "Who art Thou, 0 my God," he cries, "who art Thou who bast loved me with such an unspeakable love, and lowest me still, ungrateful, abominable sinner, that I am! What is all the beauty of this world of the angels and of the blessed spirits compared to Thine! Thou fountain of all beauty, of all goodness, of all that is amiable, Thou supreme majesty, Thou infinite abyss of love and merry! I for one vain thought, a short, momentary pleasure, a small, mean gain, could forget, offend and despise Thee! Could I sell, could I forfeit heaven, and eternal joy with Thee! O, could I repair those crimes! Could I but wash them out with my tears, even with my blood?" Through such meditations the sinner, by the grace of God, will be easily moved to sorrow. Without such or similar reflections the formulas of sorrow as read from prayer books or recited by heart, are by no means acts of contrition.

Should we make an act of contrition before confession only?

We should make an act of contrition before confession, and not only then, but every evening after the examination of conscience; we should make one immediately after any fault committed, above all when in danger of death; for we know not when God will call us to judgment, or whether we shall then have the grace to receive the sacrament of Penance with proper preparation.

III. ON THE PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT

The purpose of amending our life is as necessary for the remission of sin, as contrition; for how could he obtain forgiveness from God, who has not the determination to sin no more? The will to sin cannot exist with the hatred of sin.

What is necessary for a firm purpose?

A firm purpose of amendment requires: the determination to avoid sin; to flee from all occasions that might bring the danger of sinning, all persons, places, societies in which we usually sin; bravely to fight against our evil inclinations and bad habits; to make use of all means prescribed by our confessor, or made known to us by God Himself; to repair the injustice we have done; to restore the good name of our neighbor, and to remove the scandal and enmity we have caused.

Who, then, have no true purpose of amendment?

Those who do not truly intend to leave the frivolous persons with whom they have associated, and committed sin; to remove the occasions of cursing, swearing, drunkenness, and secret sins, etc.; who have the intention to borrow or to contract debts which they know they cannot pay, or do not even care to pay; to squander the property of their wives and children, letting them suffer want; to frequent barrooms, or saloons, fight, gamble, indulge in vile, filthy conversations and detraction, murmur against spiritual and temporal superiors, throw away precious time, and bring, even compel others to do the same. The saloon-keepers, who for the sake of money allure such wretched people, keep them there, and what is still worse, help to intoxicate them, participate in their sins.

IV. ON CONFESSION

Confession is a contrite acknowledgment of our sins to a priest who is duly authorized, in order to obtain forgiveness. This acknowledgment of our sins is an important and necessary part of the holy Sacrament of Penance.

Even in the Old Law, a certain kind of confession was prescribed and connected with a sacrifice, called the sacrifice of Atonement; but the forgiveness of sins was effected only through faith in the coming Redeemer, towards whom this sacrifice pointed (Lev. 5:5-6; Num. 5:7; compare Mt. 3:6). In the new Law, Christ gave to the apostles and their successors, power to forgive, and to retain sins (Jn. 20:21-23), and in doing so made them judges. Without confession on the part of the sinner, they cannot act as judges, and do justice in regard to giving punishment and remedies (Conc. Trid., Sess. XIV can. 6), and as the sinner is but seldom able to make an act of perfect contrition, which obtains the forgiveness of sin without confession, it was necessary that the most merciful Lord, as the Roman Catechism says (de poen. 5. 36), through the means of confession to the priest, should provide in an easier manner for the common salvation of man. Confession, at the same time, is the best means of bringing man to a knowledge of his sins and of their malice. Therefore, even Adam was obliged to acknowledge his sins, and in the same way Cain was asked by God concerning his brother's murder, although God, the Omniscient, knew the sins of both. The desire to ease the troubled conscience, seems born in man. Thus David says of his crime: Because I was silent, my bones grew old, whilst I cried out all the day long (Ps. 31:3); and in the book of Proverbs it is said; He that hideth his sins, shall not prosper: but he that shall confess and forsake them, shall obtain mercy (Prov. 28:13). Constant experience in life verifies these words, and heretics could not entirely abolish private confession, though they rejected the Sacrament of Penance.

Is confession a human law, or a human invention?

No, confession was instituted by Christ Himself; for after His resurrection He appeared to His apostles and disciples, and said to them: Peace be with you! As the Father hath sent me, I also send you; that is, the same power to remit sin which the Father has given me, I give to you. When he had said this, he breathed on them, and he said to them: Receive ye the Holy Ghost. Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained (Jn.20:21-23; compare Mt. 18:18). In these words Christ evidently gave to the apostles and their successors the power to forgive and retain sins. This they can do only when the sins are confessed to them; and, therefore, Christ, when instituting the forgiveness of sins, instituted and connected with it the acknowledgment, that is, the confession of sins. This regulation of Christ was complied with by the first Christians in humility of heart, as is proved in the Acts of the Apostles, where we read: And many (referring to the Christians at Ephesus) of them that believed, came confessing and declaring their deeds (Acts 19:18). And the apostle James exhorts his own: Confess therefore your sins one to another: and pray one for another, that you may be saved (Jas. 5:16). The work founded by Christ must stand, as long as the world, and as the apostles and disciples of our Lord died, their successors necessarily continued the work, and received the same power from Christ. This is verified by the whole history of His Church. In the very beginning of Christianity, the faithful with great sorrow confessed to the priest all their transgressions, even the smallest and most secret, after which, they received absolution. "Let us be sincerely sorry as long as we live," says St. Clement of Rome, a disciple of St. Paul (Ep. 1. ad Cor.), "for all evil which we have committed in the flesh, for having once left the world, there will no longer be any confession and penance for us." Tertullian (217 A.D.) writes of those who hid their sins, being ashamed to confess them: "Can we also hide from the knowledge of God that which we conceal from a fellow creature" (Lib. de qcen. 5. 36). Origen ('1254), after speaking of baptism, says: "There is still a severer and more tedious way of obtaining remission of sin: when the sinner moistens his pillow with tears, and is not ashamed to confess his sins to the priest of the Lord" (Hom. 3 in Lev.). St. Cyprian ('1258) writes of those Christians who during the persecutions of his time, had not sinned by openly denying the faith: "Yet because they had but thought of doing so, they make a sorrowful and simple confession to God's priests" (Sib. de laps.). Basil (f 379) writes: "Necessarily the sins must be made plain to those to whom the power of the mysteries is confided, that is, to the priests" (In reg. brew 288). Many more testimonies could be brought from the earliest centuries of Christianity, which make it clear, that Christ Himself instituted confession, and that the faithful always availed themselves of it as a means of remission of sin. It would not have been possible for a human being, though he were the mightiest prince, to have imposed upon Catholic Christianity so hard an obligation as confession, without the special command of Christ the Son of God; nor could any one have invented it without the faithful at once revolting. It is also well known that, in the Oriental Churches which separated from the true Church in the earliest ages, private confession to a priest is yet valued as a divine institution. The Catholic institution of confession, with which, in the earliest centuries, there was even connected a public confession, before the whole congregation, for notorious sinners, is as old as the Church itself, as Pope Leo the Great (f 461) proves (Ep. 136); "The secret, auricular confession was introduced into the Church as early as the times of the apostles, or their immediate successors." It was instituted by Christ, the God-Man, and instituted for the purpose of enabling the apostles and the priests, their successors, to remit in the confessional the sins committed after baptism, if the sinner heartily regrets them, sincerely confesses, and renders satisfaction for them, or to retain them if he be unworthy of absolution. From this it is seen that the enemies of the Catholic Church oppose, in rejecting confession, the plain expression of the holy Scriptures, and of entire Christian antiquity, and that it is a detestable calumny to assert that confession is simply a human invention. The divine institution of confession always was and is a fountain of sweetest consolation for sinful man, and thousands have experienced that which is said by the Council of Trent (Sess. XIV can. 3, depart.): "The effect of this Sacrament is reconciliation with God, followed by peace, cheerfulness and consolation of the heart in those who worthily receive this Sacrament."

What will aid us to make confession easy?

The consideration of the manifold benefits arising from it; first, forgiveness of all, even the most grievous sins, remission of the guilt and eternal punishment; secondly, the certainty of having again been made a child of God; thirdly, the sweet consolation and desired peace of conscience; fourthly, the necessary remedies which a pious and prudent confessor will prescribe for the cure of the diseases of the soul; finally, the prayer and exhortation of the priest which will also add to the complete conversion of the sinner.

What should be done to participate in these benefits?

Besides that which has already been said of the examination of conscience, and especially of sorrow for sin, the confession must be sincere and open-hearted; that is, a correct and exact confession not only of all mortal sins, their kind, circumstances and number, without excuses, or veiling or lessening them, but also a faithful revelation of all other spiritual affairs, fears, doubts, and other wounds of the soul; for a wound which is not shown to the physician, cannot be healed. We should not seek those confessors who are only "mute dogs" (Is. 56:10), and give absolution without hesitation, but we should trust the direction of our souls to learned, pious, and zealous priests, and remain under their guidance, as in physical sickness we remain under the care of an experienced physician, and accept their words as if Christ Himself had spoken.

How should the false shame which prevents confession be overcome?

It should be remembered that the priest in the confessional is the representative of Christ, and that whoever lies to the confessor, seeks to deceive God Himself, who abominates a lie, and at the Last Day will publicly put such a liar to shame. The confessor takes the place of Christ, and after His example must be merciful to the sinner, if, a sinful man himself, he hopes to receive merry and grace from God. At the same time, no confessor is allowed to reveal the slightest thing heard in confession, even should it cost him his life. It may be considered further that he who conceals a sin in confession, and thus obtains absolution by false pretenses, receives no remission, but, on the contrary, commits a new sin, "When man uncovers his sins, God covers them; when man conceals his sins, God reveals them," says St. Augustine. Man can be deceived, but not God, the Omniscient; and who is ashamed to show his wounds to the physician? Why should it be a cause of shame to throw out the poison of sin by a sincere confession? To sin only is shameful, to confess sin is not shameful. But if by all these reflections we are still unable to overcome ourselves so as to confess our sins to a certain confessor we may seek another in whom we have confidence.

V. ON SATISFACTION AFTER CONFESSION

Satisfaction is the diligent performance of all the works of penance imposed upon us by the confessor. With this, however, a true penitent will not be satisfied; for in our times, on account of the weakness and little zeal of Christians, a light penance is imposed that they may not be deterred from the reception of the holy Sacraments. To avoid relapsing into sin, one must do penance, and bring forth worthy fruits (Lk. 13:3), for God will only then give the grace to persevere. We satisfy God by fasting, prayer, almsdeeds, avoidance of the snares of the world, diffidence in ourselves, and especially by patient endurance of the afflictions and sufferings which He imposes upon us. Those who have committed sin must do penance in this life or submit to everlasting penance in the next.

Is the heretic right in asserting that man does not need to render satisfaction since Christ has rendered it complete on the cross?

He is entirely wrong. Christ on the cross did indeed render satisfaction for all the sins of the whole world, and man is not capable to atone for one single sin but it does not follow from this that man is not required to do something. To render satisfaction means to perform a duty which has been neglected. Instead of obeying God, the sinner by his sins disobeys Him. Satisfaction for disobedience requires perfect obedience from the sinner: but this, because of his weakness and corruption, no man is able to render therefore Christ rendered it for us by His perfect obedience even unto the death of the cross. But because Christ has been thus obedient for us, must we not be somewhat obedient also? or which is the same, because Christ for love of us has atoned for our sins by perfect obedience to His Heavenly Father, are we to do no penance for ourselves? It is precisely by this atonement made by Christ that we receive the power of rendering satisfaction. But for this we must, first of all, ask the grace, i.e., pray, to restrain our earthly desires, i.e., fast, and by means of active love (charity) make ourselves susceptible to this grace. St. Paul the Apostle, who calls himself the greatest of sinners, writes of himself: I now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up those things that are wanting of the sufferings of Christ, in my flesh for his body, which is the Church (Col. 1:24); and to the Corinthians he writes: But I chastise my body and bring it into subjection: lest perhaps: when I have preached to others (meaning penance and conversion), I myself should become cast away (I Cor. 9:27). Christ Himself did not censure the Ninivites for their fasting and their penance in sackcloth and ashes, but gave them as an example (Mt. 12:41). In the Old Testament we find that even after remitting the sin, God imposed a punishment for it. Thus He let the child of king David die, as punishment for his adultery, even though He had forgiven the sin (II Kings 12:13, 14); thus Moses and Aaron, because they once distrusted God, were not permitted to enter the Promised Land (Num. 20:24; Deut. 34:4). According to this doctrine of the Bible, the Catholic Church teaches that there remains a temporal punishment which the sinner must expiate either in this world, or in the next, though on account of the infinite merits of Christ the guilt and eternal punishment of sin are taken away by absolution. In the earliest times of the Church certain works of penance were imposed, which were then very severe, and in the course of time, owing to the indolence of the faithful, were much moderated.

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Mitch Vexler about Property Tax Fraud

https://www.brighteon.com/56353a56-e4df-4455-b36e-7ca15f000bc3



Mitch Vexler talks about Property Tax Fraud and Legal Implications, Support for Homeowners

Friday, December 20, 2024

International Public Notice: Attention President-Elect Trump

 By Anna Von Reitz

It has come to our attention that the treasonous members of the U.S. Congress have extended provisions of the PREP Act to provide a "legalization" of the otherwise completely illegal and unlawful citations of this monstrous piece of legislation, so as to impose upon the General Public as well as Federal Employees. 

This must come to a permanent and immediate stop.  

We are aware that numerous parties are advising you to keep the results of the Brunson case under advisement and to simply wait out the entire thing and let the transition appear to be normal, when in fact it is anything but normal.  

We have no wish to extend the illegal mercenary occupation of our country by as much as another day, however, if you are intent on doing your duty, that duty has never been clearer. 

Arrest the members of the U.S. Congress who have committed these atrocious crimes against us and against humanity and bind them over for trial.  Announce the results of the Brunson case without delay.  Put an end to this travesty of justice.  

There are only 515 people responsible for this Mess, plus approximately 40 former members of Congress, and a few hundred senior bureaucrats in executive services and the intelligence community.   Arrest them now.  Don't wait. 

These criminals have already spent billions of dollars of unauthorized allocations of our credit to promote criminal purposes.  The death toll worldwide from Mike Pompeo's "live exercise" stands at nearly 31 million souls.  

There isn't a single word about health in The Constitution of the United States of America, nor is there any authorization allowing any Successor to redelegate any administrative or delegated powers to the United Nations or any foreign commercial or municipal corporation whatsoever. 

The entire public trust scheme seeking to redefine Americans as British Territorial U.S. Citizens is a farce and the additional sin of creating Municipal Corporations named after them is a blatant act of 
personage, and the practice bringing charges against these entities is another crime --- barratry.  

Jimmy Carter's transfer of the fraudulently constructed birth registrations as securities to the IMF was another criminal act in Breach of Trust and service contract(s).  His purported turning over of the American populace to the control of the United Nations is yet another egregious fraud, betrayal, and misrepresentation. 

None of this requires any great deliberation in view of the evidence.
We have labored under the miseries of this False Narrative since 1863.  Waiting another month to end it serves no good purpose and only increases the likelihood of a nuclear False Flag, another "pandemic" or similar harm to the living people.  

Take them down.  Now.  Before another penny is spent or another life lost. 

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 20th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 5100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Real Reason for Gun Control and the ATF

 


Wednesday, December 18, 2024

International Public Notice: No Drones Policy for The United States, Ending the FBI, the UN, Inc., and Illegal Mercenary Occupation

 By Anna Von Reitz

For some years a controversy has been growing about the experimental uses of drones, both small and large; drones have been developed as toys, spy cameras, delivery vehicles, high and low altitude survey and detection devices, and even as armaments. 

These things fly more or less silently through our skies and can be remotely guided from undisclosed locations by unknown operators and used to cause havoc, drop bombs, fire bullets or missiles and perform kamikaze missions by flying them into other aircraft. 

All of this has become increasingly surreal and game-like, with the drone guidance systems mimicking popular cyber games. 

We do not believe that the development of this technology has been pursued in a responsible fashion nor do we believe that proper oversight has been applied to it by the U.S. Military, DOD, or FAA, facts which have again been underlined by recent swarms of U.S. Government drones sweeping the East Coast of The United States, apparently deployed to detect a missing shipment of enriched Uranium and/or "dirty bomb". 

A False Flag of this kind would allow the Biden Administration to potentially stay in power longer and could be used to create an "emergency" justifying overt rather than covert martial law, which has long been the standard in this country as a part of an illegal mercenary occupation stemming from the so-called American Civil War.  

As the foreign (District) corporatocracy supporting this has grown and become more corrupt and as public employees have forgotten who their actual employers are, the "privatization" of government duties and functions has accelerated until CEOs like Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and Elon Musk have taken over and directed not only what appear to be government activities, but policies, and have aligned them with their own corporate profitability, political leanings, and even psychopathy. 

The end result is an Unseen Oligarchy of largely technological corporate interests and defense contractors being in de facto control of what is supposed to be our government; the U.S. Congress has become little more than a den of thieves and ignoramuses that readily admit their failure to read the "laws" they are passing and don't consider the appropriations of our credit that they are making "for" us during our purported "absence".  

They recently apportioned themselves $5 million each, to spend however they wish, with no accountability to the American Public. 

The absence of our American Federal Subcontractor in no way damages our own ability to perform the delegated functions and does not render our government absent overall; nor, does it provide any excuse to our European Federal Subcontractors to abuse our hospitality and credit in this manner.  The so-called privatization of their traditional duties and functions has led to disorder and disgraceful abuses of power and breaches of trust. 

Our policy is to shut down the airspace over the States of the Union and conduct forthright investigation announced to the public in the event of a False Flag or actual potential attack involving missing enriched Uranium or bomb technology.  The eyes and ears of millions of alerted Americans are infinitely more effective in detecting suspicious activities and containers than fleets of radiation sniffing drones. 

It is thought that the current False Flag, as with most False Flag activity in this country, is being pursued by elements of the misguided Federal Bureau of Investigations under the direction of individuals loyal to Christopher Wray, recently resigned head of the FBI.  

For some years now, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, has been privately owned and operated, and it has been misguided and misdirected by its successive leaders and board members to engage in illegal and immoral activities outside the traditional role of the FBI and even outside the jurisdiction of the FBI.   

These activities have included assassination of political leaders and dissidents, numerous politically-motivated False Flags, spying and surveillance activities, and direct politically-motivated interference as agent provocateurs, as in the January 6th Protests, in which plain-clothes and/or costumed FBI agents stood down Capitol Police, opened the Capitol to the crowds, and encouraged people to enter the buildings. 

This same renegade and privatized "federal agency" has also taken part in such atrocities as Ruby Ridge, Waco, and the murder of LaVoy Finicum.  

The FBI was recently complicit in the attacks on California, Hawaii, and seven states impacted by the weather warfare-induced Hurricane Helene.  They were also caught directing the DOJ and IRS to conduct punitive investigations of Federation personnel and setting up the shooter who came very close to assassinating then-candidate Donald Trump.  In the more distant past, the FBI colluded with MI6 officers in the assassination of President Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King, Jr. 

The purported public mission of the FBI is to prevent crime, but due to private control and misdirection of this agency, it has gone rogue and been used to perpetuate politically and economically motivated crime throughout this country for decades. 

The Federal Bureau of Investigations, Incorporated, needs to be disbanded and replaced by our unincorporated Continental Marshals Service, which operates transparently in the service of the public and in the Public Interest of the people of this country.  

We are sorry that it has become necessary to make these issues public and to disclose them internationally, but these and other misuses and abuses of what are supposed to be public resources by private interests have to be exposed for what they are. 

So must the illegal quasi-military occupation of our country by British Territorial government interests be exposed and ended. These charlatans have promoted a vast crime amounting to a National level Identity Theft, not only in this country, but in numerous other countries as well.  These are crimes of state and the government(s) of Britain and Rome are fully complicit in them. 

Today, the reckless and unauthorized spending of the British Territorial U.S. Congress is supporting no less than two dozen proxy "wars" --- mercenary incursions, including the genocide taking place in Gaza at the hands of the State of Israel, Incorporated, the silent genocide taking place in Syria at the hands of the Turkish Army Mercenaries being paid with transferred Roman Catholic money, and the genocide taking place in Ukraine. 

No Ukrainian government that gave a damn about the country or the people of Ukraine would be willing to continue a senseless struggle that ruins the land and has already killed more than 600,000 Ukrainians. The proof against Mr. Zelensky, CEO of the Ukraine, Incorporated, is in the pudding. 

Likewise, the UN, Inc. is on the chopping block.  As we have pointed out, there are no "nations" in the United Nations, only corporations, a fraud which in and of itself demands the dissolution of the UN, Inc. 
As we have also pointed out, the UN, Inc., has grossly failed its purported mission and has repeatedly failed to control the violence and peace-breaking of Israel.  By the same logic that disbanded the League of Nations for failure to promote and enforce peace, the United Nations and the UN, Inc., have to go.  

Those persons to whom this International Public Notice is addressed have cause to know the veracity, history, and authority with which this information is provided. 

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. 

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 18th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 5100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: End the Madness

 By Anna Von Reitz

It should not be necessary for us or anyone else to say this, but expecting parents to put 200 vaccines into the bodies of their babies and small children is madness. 


It's time to take the employees of the CDC out into the street and publicly inject each and every one of them with all 200 vaccines that they are mandating for our school children. 

We guarantee that the problem of unaccountable agency recommendations foisted off as public law will end abruptly and never surface again. 

Consider this a demand for performance from the actual government of this country to all government officials and all public employees and all military officers.  

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals;  Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.  

Prompt action is required. 


The so-called custodians are not our custodians.  They are outlaws pretending to be public officials and caretakers, parasitic and predatory non-entities breaking Universal Law and attempting to coerce people into harming their own children.  

A public demonstration of justice is required. 

When we see the lifeless bodies of the CDC officials who have made these recommendations punctured with 200 hypodermic needles and bloated with their own immune system reactions, we will feel that justice has been done. 

This does not require any lengthy court battle or legal determination; the threat to the life and well-being of our children veiled as a "protective health measure" is self-evident.  

All this takes is a three-man tribunal of military officers.  

Let those responsible taste the fate they have meted out to others. 

Until then, be aware that we do not accept the offer, and will happily shove needles into anyone making such an offer. 

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 18th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 5100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

A Short History of Corporations

 By Anna Von Reitz

A corporation, being a legal fiction and a creature of the mind, may persist in the imagination of the victims of their delusion for as long as it may function as a business enterprise capable of supporting employees and avoid destruction at the hands of the outraged public.  Memes unlike genes do not depend on physical progeniture, and may be adopted as good ideas or evil ideas, by however many people of whatever race, creed, culture, or moment in time, may deem themselves benefited or at least unharmed by the existence of a corporation. 

Pepsico is a good example.  Pepsi has changed its recipe so drastically and so often over the years that the current brew has little resemblance in content or taste to the original recipe and the corporation pretty much subsists on the strength of its trademarks, marketing, and distribution.   (And a whole lot of sugar.) 

The fundamental argument used to promote the acceptance of commercial corporations was that certain necessary activities are by nature so prone to accident and endangerment, such as the production of guns, certain drugs, gun powder, nitroglycerin,  dynamite, and poisons, that investors would not invest for fear of liability --- thus certain advantages and protections, including public bankruptcy protection for shareholders of publicly owned corporations and the benefit of the corporate veil for owners and board members, were allowed.  This stimulated a craze of investment in war, death and disease related industry, which then promoted more of the same.  Soon businesses that did not involve any significant risk or liability were incorporating simply because attorneys were advising it (to benefit the British Crown) and average business owners were not privy to the whole reasoning behind the move to incorporate arms, chemical, medical, and other large industrial enterprises.  The assumption appears to have been that if it was good for the Big Boys, it was good for the little people, too. 

The problem, little noted at the time, was that incorporation requires public guarantee of the business and that guarantee manifested as underwriting grants the government the controlling interest in the business, so in effect, knowingly or unknowingly, those who incorporated their businesses gave their control and ownership interest away to the government.  This is exactly the circumstance discussed in a veiled way in Ayn Rand's saga, Atlas Shrugged.  Men who built steel mills and oil refineries and railroads and huge construction businesses and mining operations and factories of all kinds, incorporated their businesses to limit their liability, and too late found out that they had given away their ownership interest and were reduced to taking orders from faceless unelected bureaucrats.  Incorporation of business enterprises large and small promotes fascist governments in which the government obtains a controlling interest in business enterprises for the cost of insuring them, and leaves the former owners still doing all the day to day work and paying all the costs. 

This is how the USA, Inc. and UNITED STATES (INC.) came to have controlling interest in all the Fortune 500 companies, the stock and securities companies and banks, the commodities markets, pension funds, and public infrastructure and investment funds---- from people foolishly trying to avoid risk and accountability by incorporating their business to protect personal fortunes.  

The argument in favor of Municipal Corporations was less about risk and more about the Greco-Roman Renaissance that took place in the years immediately following the so-called Civil War. Admiration for the Greek city-states coupled with the growth of urban areas resulted in the development of the Municipal Corporation model and a rash of "independent international city states" that have popped up everywhere, and then, those Municipal Corporations have joined together in common cause as the "Empire of the Cities".  This is where we get "globalism" and "transnationalism" and "global resets" and false claims of custodial roles and powers.  Unlike the commercial British Crown Corporations, Municipal Corporations deal in intellectual property assets and performances --- they copyright our names, enter us into unconscionable obligatory performance contracts, securitize our intellectual property assets, steal our credit, tax our labor, etc. 

One easy way to see it, is that the British Crown Commercial Corporations are all about "gaining something for nothing" and specialize in targeting industrial enterprises and public infrastructure, while municipal corporations deal in blood money, securitization swindles, impersonation schemes, labor contracts, and intellectual assets theft. 

The existence of all these corporations is tied to self-seeking avoidance of liability and accountability, all are supposed to be limited to "any lawful purpose"--- no merely legal purposes--- and no, we don't need them.  They have proven to be corrupt contrivances that have caused great harm thanks to their endless and irresponsible and unaccountable search for profit-at-any-cost, including cost to the public that endures their existence and pays for their failures. 

The recent so-called pandemic is a good example of what happens when rogue corporations are allowed to run wild.  

Unfortunately for us, the most effective and traditional means of dealing with out-of-control corporations and even cartels of corporations like the WEF is a function of Ecclesiastical Law and the responsibility of the Roman Pontiff --- an office which the Roman Catholic Church dissolved in 2011.  We have inherited a runaway train brought to us by the Roman Curia, which is more intent on circling the wagons and ginning up wars of conquest in the Middle East than it is in doing its duty or solving the very real problems that it has caused iva the proliferation of corporations of all kinds.  

Legal fiction is still fiction --- still a big fat lie.  We are left dealing with these obnoxious fabrications using such dinosaurs as the Sherman Antitrust Act and Logan Act against them. They are well-funded, know how to spread bribes, and are loathe to give up a scheme that has us paying all their insurance, taxes, mortgages, and operating expenses free gratis.  

The fundamental fight is between corporations that don't really exist, and living people.  It's a fight that none of us can afford to lose. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 5100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Silver Set to Skyrocket: The Gold-Silver Ratio's STORED ENERGY - Mike Maloney & Alan Hibbard

 https://youtu.be/9BuBK-ol9dg


Join Mike Maloney and Alan as they uncover the insane undervaluation of silver and what it means for your portfolio. In this deep dive, we explore:

  • Historical Gold-Silver Ratios: Why today’s 84:1 ratio is a screaming buy signal for silver.
  • Market Manipulation Exposed: How 411 paper silver ounces exist for every real ounce – a crisis waiting to happen.
  • Explosive Potential: Both gold and silver are forming rare, parabolic bases, pointing to a seismic revaluation.
  • The $10,000 Gold Prediction: What history tells us about the future of precious metals.

Don’t miss this compelling analysis and the unique opportunity to position yourself ahead of the curve.

At SLC Distributing we have new ways for you to get silver at great prices. For small orders go to this link: https://quicksilver.me/296110 Click on Get Started in the upper right corner.

For orders of 100 ounces or more:

Office phone  406 889 3183  8 AM to 2 PM and 4PM to 6 PM weekdays.

Cell  406 253 4257  when I am not in the office. Try the Office line first.

pstramer@gmail.com   or  pstramer@eurekadsl.net

International Public Notice: Citizenship v Nationality

 By Anna Von Reitz

There are only four(4) possible "citizenships" in The United States. 

The first form of citizenship predating all the others, is State Citizenship.  A State Citizen owes his or her allegiance uniquely to the State where they live --- California, Wisconsin, etc.  This is an peculiarly American Citizenship, entirely voluntary, and engaged in by adults knowing and being accountable for their actions. 

The second form of citizenship is United States Citizenship, a form of citizenship created by the First Naturalization Act, which allows Americans to go through a lengthy and voluntary process allowing them to demonstrate their good character and other attributes allowing them to work for the original American Federal Subcontractor, the Federal Republic, established under The Constitution for the united States of America ( Federal Constitution, 1787).  

States of America refers to the doing-business-as name of the Second Confederacy which failed in 1861.  The First Confederacy between the soil and land jurisdiction States known as the Union States (soil)  and the States of the Union (land) survived intact as a "perpetual Union" under the Laws of Nature; the Second Confederacy between the States of the Union (land and sea) and the States of America (air) failed because business organizations created by men cannot guarantee a "perpetual union" via any means of contract.     That is, they attempted to guarantee a contract that they could not possibly guarantee, and in the end, the contract failed in April of 1861.  When it did, both the Second Confederacy and the Federal Republic failed; the United States Citizens lost their political status as a result and this form of citizenship has been vacated ever since.  

The third form of citizenship is known as U.S. Citizenship and it refers to the citizenship status of British Territorials living in United States Territories and Possessions, such as Puerto Rico and the Mariana Islands; these people are British Territorial Subjects.  Puerto Rico remains a British Commonwealth nation to this day.  They are foreign with respect to the "free, sovereign and independent states" of the Union States and the States of the Union, but they work for us under The Constitution of the United States of America (Territorial Constitution, 1789). 

The fourth form of citizenship known as "citizenship of the United States" attaches to the Holy Roman Empire's Municipal Government employees who staff the Federal Civil Service working under The Constitution of the United States (Municipal Constitution, 1790).  This is the form of citizenship referenced by the infamous (and still unratified) Fourteenth Amendment to The Constitution of the United States of America (Territorial Constitution) and also arbitrarily "conferred upon" freed Negroes who were still being denied political status by some of the Southern States after the Civil "War" Conflict.  This is again a foreign citizenship unique to the District of Columbia.  

The Federal Civil Service and its "citizens of the United States" sided with the Southern States in the Civil War Conflict; afterward, the British Territorial U.S. Congress was looking for a way to collect war reparations from them.  Adding the freed plantation slaves to the ranks of the "citizens of the United States" gave them more targets to attach as chattels backing their own public debts, so "citizens of the United States" are chattels and debtors by definition under the Fourteenth Amendment, even though the States of the Union never ratified the Fourteenth Amendment or any subsequent amendment. 

That is, the Fourteenth Amendment to the Territorial Constitution stands as a unilateral and substantively unenforceable contract amendment made by employees without the agreement of their employers; it exists only upon the legal presumption that the States of the Union have not formally disagreed, and so it is thought to be accepted by acquiescence, when our States of the Union have never been properly addressed concerning this issue and no ratification process demonstrating due diligence has ever been pursued by our Territorial Employees. 

This unilateral action adopting the Fourteenth Amendment to The Constitution of the United States of America without formal ratification by the States of the Union, created a citizenry of slaves "owned" by the British Territorial United States as chattel property and as you will read in the (still unratified) Fourteenth Amendment, they were defined first as criminals, and because they were criminals, as slaves. 

The effect was to abolish slavery with one hand (Thirteenth Amendment) and institutionalize public sector slavery with the other hand (Fourteenth Amendment).  Thus, the issue of slavery was never resolved; private slave ownership was outlawed, but public slave ownership was allowed and institutionalized to the detriment of all concerned. 

These are the four --- and only four --- forms of citizenship that have existed in this country since the War of Independence

With respect to your referenced case, the issue is entirely: (1) when did this issue arise, and what kinds of "United States" citizenship were available at the time? and (2) which of the potentially three (3) forms of "United States" citizenship are being referenced with respect to the intended renunciation? 

As you will see by closely reading the document that you presented to us for evaluation concerning an issue that arose in the 1980s, what was actually being considered was United States nationality, not United States citizenship --- which are two entirely different things:
  

So, now that we have recognized the fact that "citizenship" in this case is a Red Herring, let's deal with nationality and properly reframe the issue of any stare decisis, which is not about "US citizenship" but instead about American nationality, which precludes any form of US citizenship absent formal proof of its voluntary and conscious and fully disclosed adoption and continuance. 

Americans born in one of the States of the Union take their nationality from their State and are known by the demonym of that State of the Union --- they are Californians, New Yorkers, Texans, Wisconsinites, Minnesotans, Virginians and so on.  That is our actual nationality as a member, by birth, of a nation-state.  Unlike people born in virtually any other country on Earth, Americans are not presumed to inherit citizenship obligations at birth and in fact cannot undertake citizenship obligations even if they wish to volunteer, until they reach the age of majority, which for them is still 21 years of age. 

British Territorial U.S. Citizens are born as British Subjects and as such inherit citizenship obligations to the British Government at birth and are considered to be British Territorial Nationals --- Puerto Ricans, Mariana Islanders, etc.  

Municipal "citizens of the United States" likewise are born as Roman Municipal citizens and inherit those obligations to their foreign government at birth; their nationality, to the extent that it exists, is dependent on the existence of the "independent, international city state of Washington, DC".  They can be called "Washingtonians" but that would cause confusion with the people born in Washington, the State.  A quick check of the official Government Printing Office list of demonyms shows that this precise confusion does exist and that both populations, those born in Washington the State and those born in Washington the City, are calling themselves "Washingtonians".  

A better answer has been suggested: "District Columbians", but this has not been adopted. 

So, now you know that nationality derives from where you are born, whereas citizenship refers to owing service and duty to the government of that place. 

In America, you can be born in a State of the Union, say, Wisconsin, and owe no duty to serve the government of Wisconsin.  The government of Wisconsin instead owes a duty of service to the people born in or living in Wisconsin, the Wisconsinites. 

If you are born in Puerto Rico, you are a Puerto Rican national by birth --- that's your nationality, and you inherit the citizenship obligations of a British Territorial Subject. 

If you are born in Washington, DC., you are a "Washingtonian" (until further notice), and you inherit the citizenship obligations of a Holy Roman Empire city-state. 

There are some saving loopholes to all this.  If you are born in a British Territory or other foreign country or political status (e.g. born in Washington, DC, because your parents were working there), and one or more of your parents was born in a State of the Union, you can claim their birthplace as your own and adopt their nation-state nationality.   

If, for reasons of insanity and fraud, a foreign nation such as the British Territorial Commonwealth nation of Puerto Rico tries to "confer" its citizenship obligations on you, you are also free to expatriate from that presumed foreign political status or any other "conferred" foreign political status (such as "citizen of the United States") under the Expatriation Act.  

Bottom-line -- Americans are not "US Nationals" of any stripe and are not heir to any kind of United States citizenship by birth, either.  

We belong to our States of the Union (land) and our nation-states (soil), as free, sovereign, and independent people. 

All our Territorial and Municipal employees are both contractually and honor-bound to make sure it stays that way; any usurpation against our nation-states or attempts to unlawfully convert our natural political status, is an international crime known as unlawful political conversion, which is a capital crime under both the Geneva and Hague Conventions. 

Any "misunderstanding" on this point needs to be cleared away.  We have herein fully demonstrated our awareness and mastery of these identity issues, have claimed our nationality, and have asserted our natural freedom from any inherited or unconscionable contractual citizenship obligations to any foreign government, Territorial or Municipal. 

So any stare decisis established by any international court or commission must firmly establish and respect these obligations on the part of the United States Subcontractors and hold us harmless from foreign citizenship obligations that our foreign employees have attempted to confer on us. 

The intention to refuse claims of United States citizenship obligations is not the same as an intention to renounce one's birthright nationality.

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 17th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 5100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.