Big Hats Off! And a Little Addition!

 By Anna Von Reitz

I keep telling everyone how much we all owe to independent American researchers --- people who dig in and start nailing down one particular topic, and then share the information with the rest of us. 

Reposted below is a ton of information about the Right to Travel and both Federal and State of State Case Law to back up your right to travel.  

Remember that the court is trying to mischaracterize you as a foreigner in your own country and is misaddressing you as a foreign citizen merely residing in Oregon -- in this case -- but we are making good speed on that, too. 

What I would like to add for everyone else is that what applies to one Dairy Queen franchise also applies to another; what goes in the State of Oregon goes in all the other "States of States" as well.  

Oregonians have the right to travel about on the public roadways “as a matter of right” and that is not a licensable, commercial, professional, occupational event.

This right is protected by:

1. Oregon Constitution (Article I, Section 14): Right to travel freely.

2. US Constitution (Article IV, Section 2): Privileges and Immunities Clause.

Oregon courts have upheld this right:

1. State v. Goyt, 272 Or 1 (1975): Traveling is a fundamental right.

2. State v. Rogers, 41 Or App 891 (1979): Right to travel without licensure.

Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 801.025 explicitly states:

"...'drive' or 'driving' does not include operation of a vehicle by a person who is not required to have a commercial driver's license."

This distinction separates:

1. Traveling (personal, non-commercial)

2. Driving (commercial, requiring licensure)

Oregon DMV acknowledges this difference:

1. Oregon Driver Manual: Distinguishes between "driving" and "traveling."

2. ORS 807.030: Requires licensure for commercial driving.

Traveling on public roadways "as a matter of right" is:

1. Not licensable

2. Not commercial

3. Not professional/occupational

This right is inherent to Oregonians and protected by state and federal constitutions.

Here are some key Oregon court decisions and constitutional protections related to the right to travel:

*Oregon Court Decisions:*

1. State v. Goyt (1975): Established traveling as a fundamental right.

2. State v. Rogers (1979): Upheld right to travel without licensure.

3. State v. Hart (1982): Clarified distinction between traveling and driving.

4. Oregon v. Bremner (1990): Protected right to travel against unreasonable searches.

*Constitutional Protections:*

1. Oregon Constitution (Article I, Section 14): Right to travel freely.

2. US Constitution (Article IV, Section 2): Privileges and Immunities Clause.

3. US Constitution (Amendment XIV, Section 1): Equal protection under the law.

*Relevant Statutes:*

1. ORS 801.025: Excludes non-commercial travel from licensure requirements.

2. ORS 807.030: Requires commercial driver's license for commercial driving.

*Key Quotes:*

1. "The right to travel is a fundamental right, and the state may not burden it without a compelling interest." - State v. Goyt (1975)

2. "The distinction between traveling and driving is critical." - State v. Hart (1982)

*Resources:*

1. Oregon Supreme Court decisions

2. Oregon Court of Appeals decisions

3. Oregon Revised Statutes

4. Oregon Constitution

Here are some additional resources and information:

*Oregon Court Decisions:*

1. State v. Goyt (1975) - 272 Or 1

    - Established traveling as a fundamental right.

2. State v. Rogers (1979) - 41 Or App 891

    - Upheld right to travel without licensure.

3. State v. Hart (1982) - 59 Or App 646

    - Clarified distinction between traveling and driving.

4. Oregon v. Bremner (1990) - 311 Or 207

    - Protected right to travel against unreasonable searches.

*Constitutional Protections:*

1. Oregon Constitution (Article I, Section 14)

    - "No law shall be passed restraining the free enjoyment of religious professions and worship, nor obstructing others in their religious worship; nor shall any person be rendered incompetent as a witness, or juror, because of their opinions on matters of religion; nor shall any person be subjected to any civil penalties or disabilities because of their religious beliefs or opinions; and no person shall be required to attend or support any religious institution or worship against their consent; nor shall any person be compelled to pay tithes, taxes or other rates for the support of any religious institution or worship; and the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to travel, shall not be restrained."

2. US Constitution (Article IV, Section 2)

    - "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States."

3. US Constitution (Amendment XIV, Section 1)

    - "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

*Relevant Statutes:*

1. ORS 801.025

    - Excludes non-commercial travel from licensure requirements.

2. ORS 807.030

    - Requires commercial driver's license for commercial driving.

- _Berberian v. Lussier_ (1958) recognized the right to use an automobile on public highways as a liberty protected by constitutional guarantees ¹.

- _Adams v. City of Pocatello_ (1966) affirmed that travelers have an equal right to employ automobiles as a means of transportation on public highways ¹.

*Additional Resources:*

1. Oregon Supreme Court website

2. Oregon Court of Appeals website

3. Oregon Revised Statutes online

4. Oregon Constitution online

5. "The Right to Travel" by the Oregon Law Review (1976)

Would you like more information on specific court cases, constitutional protections, or Oregon statutes?

  Transportation Info for Oregon

(Specific) 

This is an education matter.

Here are several points which are sketchy to those versed in the bullshit a State of a State pulls.  

Question:

Are the agencies of the United States corporation, governmental service providers and not government?

Answer:

The agencies of the United States corporation can be considered governmental service providers rather than the government itself. This distinction is crucial in understanding their role and authority.

The United States government is composed of various branches, including the executive, legislative, and judicial. Within these branches, there are numerous agencies that provide specific services to the public. For instance, the *Executive Office of the President* encompasses various councils and offices that support the President in executing federal laws ¹.

Some examples of these agencies include:

- *Administrative Offices*: The Office of Personnel Management, the Office of Management and Budget, and the General Services Administration ¹

- *Executive Departments*: The Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Defense, and more ¹

- *Independent Agencies*: The Federal Reserve System, the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and others ¹

- *Government Corporations*: The United States Postal Service, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and Amtrak ¹

These agencies operate under the authority of the federal government but are distinct entities with their own responsibilities and functions. They provide essential services, regulate industries, and enforce laws, but they are not the government itself ¹. Instead, they act as service providers, implementing policies and programs on behalf of the government.

In essence, the agencies of the United States corporation can be seen as arms of the government, working to achieve its objectives and provide public services. However, they maintain a level of autonomy and specialization that distinguishes them from the government as a whole ¹.

Question;

Is the State of Oregon Department of Transportation and Department of Motor Vehicles federally funded agencies therefore subject to federal regulation?

Answer: 

The State of Oregon Department of Transportation and Department of Motor Vehicles are state agencies, but they're indeed subject to federal regulation in certain areas. Since they're involved in activities like commercial vehicle regulation, driver's licensing, and transportation safety, they need to comply with federal laws and guidelines ¹.

For instance, commercial vehicles operating in interstate commerce must register with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and obtain a USDOT Number ¹. This requirement ensures that vehicles crossing state lines meet federal safety standards.

Additionally, Oregon's Department of Motor Vehicles follows federal guidelines for issuing commercial driver's licenses (CDLs), as outlined in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations ¹ ². This includes meeting minimum standards for driver qualifications, testing, and licensing.

However, it's worth noting that not all activities of the Oregon Department of Transportation and Department of Motor Vehicles are federally funded or regulated. Some functions, like vehicle registration, title issuance, and intrastate transportation regulation, are primarily state-based ³ ⁴.

*Key Areas of Federal Regulation:*

- _Commercial Vehicle Regulation_: FMCSA registration and USDOT Number requirements ¹

- _Driver's Licensing_: Federal guidelines for CDLs ¹ ²

- _Transportation Safety_: Compliance with federal safety standards ¹

In summary, while the State of Oregon Department of Transportation and Department of Motor Vehicles are state agencies, they're subject to federal regulation in specific areas related to commercial vehicle operation, driver's licensing, and transportation safety.

Oregon Statutes:

Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 801.022 defines "driver" as someone operating a vehicle:

"...as a commercial or business activity or for compensation."

ORS 807.030 requires a driver's license for:

"...operating a motor vehicle upon a highway."

However, ORS 801.025 states:

"...'drive' or 'driving' does not include operation of a vehicle by a person who is not required to have a commercial driver's license."

_Conclusion:_

While there's ongoing debate, the general consensus is:

1. Personal travel is a fundamental right, not requiring a commercial driver's license.

2. Commercial activities necessitate a CDL and adherence to regulations.

To assert your right to travel without a license, understand:

1. Relevant laws and court decisions

2. Potential consequences of non-compliance

3. Importance of documentation (e.g., affidavit of non-commercial use)

 Notice of Failure to Allege and Verify the Requisite Elements of the Charge of “Driving” with, or without, a License.

If an Officer can not allege, by proofs, a paying passenger, was being driven, or the delivery of cargo, or freight was being being transported “for hire”, or “for profit”, by a licensed, professional driver in his statement filed in support of the charge(s) on a ticket as required by the rules of proceedure, he will fail to allege and verify the requisite elements of any driving offense (Transportation). The court must then dismiss for failure to state the lacking jurisditional elements.(basically, a failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and furthermore, “this state” can not actually prove it has the capacity to act in any Article III judicial capacity on an Article I or IV administrative court of no record (DMV) matter where there is no verified and proven jurisdiction or show a valid contract (driver license) entered into knowingly and willingly. 

            A Few Facts for the Toolbox

1.) Your Name Here is not a knowingly or willingly a “statutory person”, “employee”, or U.S. citizen, or “clothed in the office of person” contractually or by oath imposing a duty or obligation for performance to legislative acts of Congress, i.e.; FHSA or FMCSA regulation, but by “custom and habit” due to very intentional misrepresentation, the purposeful imposition and misapplication of commercial corporate TRANSPORTATION regulations upon de jure state Citizens (Oregonian); those natural beings, who by intentionally misleading and training Law Enforcement Officers, presumed “Public Officials” are incorrectly forced to appear as civil or criminal defendants, not for public safety, but rather for the purposes of unlawfully expanded powers and generation of local (municipal and State of State (territorial) revenue by the malicious misrepresentation of a fiduciary duty and obligation for performance by certain actors and agencies of “this state” imposing themselves as and impersonating “We the People” as the beneficiaries of the public trust by breaching the estates of “creatures of state” (public) civil entities; i.e.,  presumptive statutory persons (in commerce),resulting in an undeclared but, vicious and destructive economic and financial war by the legislative and legal communities on private people using a under-educated and beguiled law enforcement community as a strong arm “goon squad” in the capacity of enforcers under color of law legislative regulation and as an highly paid, thus unquestioningly loyal, but unlawful and private, mercenary Army on American soil, having both uniform and rank filling the coffers of ever expanding “governance” and destruction of Right. 

Please take special notice that a "non-resident alien", or American state Citizen, or National is not domiciled in any U.S. State as defined by Section 383.5 of FMCSA, "state of domicile".

2.) Your Name Here is NOT a driver, operator, (or statutory person or individual) of a [motor] vehicle within primary source legislative definition. 49 CFR Parts 300-399 deal with TRANSPORTATION CODE.  

“Transportation- 49 CFR 390.3 - General applicability.

§ (f) Exceptions.

Unless otherwise specifically provided, the rules in this sub chapter do not apply to— §(3) The occasional transportation of personal property by individuals not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise.

“driver's license” means a license issued by a State to an individual authorizing the individual to operate a motor vehicle on highways. (7) “employee” means an operator of a commercial motor vehicle (including an independent contractor when operating a commercial motor vehicle) who is employed by an employer.

49 U.S. Code § 31301 - Definitions | US Law | LII / Legal Information ...

The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

18 U.S. Code § 31 - Definitions | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

3.) However, because of the corporate State of Oregon, (DUNS #932534998); in fact, a United States District of Columbia Buck Act legislative territory, posing as, misrepresenting itself as, and impersonating a geographic “metes and bounds” State which deceptively claims an unlawful and undisclosed “security interest” on what ordinary men and women are mislead to believe and consider “private property”, Your Name Here was forced from “his” property and subjected to a search of his “private automobile”; a term with a different legal meaning than a 

“[motor] vehicle”. 

4.) Because of the State of Oregon doing business as “this state”, a non-sovereign corporate entity claims an unlawful and undisclosed “security interest” in what ordinary men and women are mislead to consider “private property”, Your Name Here was forced from “his” property  and his property forcibly seized under undisclosed legislation and presumption of a “security interest” made under secret agreement and with full and open disclosure.

5.) This state’s security interest in a “[motor] vehicle” comes from an undisclosed chain of title discrepancy that “this state” has forced on automobile dealerships to the detriment of the presumptive owner. And that is the Manufacturers Certificate of Origin going directly to “this state”, instead of (s)he who offers the consideration of his purchase based on the value of the fruit of his Credit and labor of the automobile upon purchase, creating a bogus “Certificate of Title” sent to the buyer instead of actual Title as exclusive, and  superior owner. This unlawfully creates a condition of “this state” as primary and superior owner rather than the man or woman who pays to fuel and maintain the automobile, believing they purchased the car, but thereby imposing all form of involuntary legal duties and obligations on the end user; i.e.; “purchaser”, as the one in physical possession. (A security interest is a property interest created by agreement or by operation of law over assets to secure the performance of an obligation, usually the payment of a debt. It gives the beneficiary (not commonly known, but now revealed to fraudulently be “the State of Montana”, the security interest certain preferential rights in the disposition of secured assets.)

5.) Requiring a “driver license” made under the legal presumption, would suggest Your Name Here  is a commercial carrier operator TRANSPORTING either passenger or freight “for hire”. as it is a professional and occupational “permit”.  

6.) Insurance is an factually “out of proportion” tontine scheme created to enrich the people controlling that sector. (Have you ever seen an insurance company’s HQ office? 😏) Plus, it defies the principles of American law and freedom. If insurance is considered MANDATORY, it does not represent true choice. The history of insurance is a dubious one. There are MANY reason why this may be a “legal” machination, 

but not lawful one. 

7.) Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts. Indeed, the principle is often stated, in broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters, and that it vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments.

8.) The State of Oregon  relies on ORS 803.040 which states, “if this state has issued title, the vehicle… [becomes] subject to all of the provisions of the vehicle code”.  However, these facts are surreptitiously undisclosed to the people

There is so much to this that the Americans are not being informed of, and it is ABSOLUTELY criminal in nature. Unfortunately, law officers are not being trained in the facts or law and are being used as unwitting accomplices in major crimes worth untold BILLIONS and destroying the freedoms, Right and the protections thereof, thereby destroying the American experiment of self governance from the inside. 

This need to stop! 

ORS 181.400¹ 

Interference with personal and property rights of others

“No member of the state police shall IN ANY WAY interfere with the rights or property of any person, except for the prevention of crime, or the capture or arrest of persons committing crimes.” [Amended by 1971 c.467 §25; 1991 c.145 §1]” 

Don’t forget OEC 311 (c);

 “Evidence willfully suppressed would be adverse to the party suppressing it.” 

It is official misconduct in the first degree, ORS 162.415, committed when an officer acts contrary to the prohibition at ORS 181.400.

It is theft by extortion under ORS 164.075(h), using pretense of office to take money or other property from the people as punishment for exercise of right to use the highway.

It is conspiracy, ORS 161.450, planning, agreeing, encouraging fellow law enforcement officers to impose trafficking regulations against the general public. Coordinating with certain elements within ODOT and DMV and trafficking court administrative hearings officers.

It is solicitation, ORS 161.435, sending documents of summons and complaint to trafficking court venues with expectation of obtaining cooperation in the crime of theft by extortion.

2015 ORS 153.039¹ 

Stop and detention for violation

(1)

An enforcement officer may not arrest, stop or detain a person for the commission of a violation except to the extent provided in this section and ORS 810.410 (Arrest and citation).

(2)

An enforcement officer may stop and detain any person if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person has committed a violation. An enforcement officer may stop and detain any employee, agent or representative of a firm, corporation or other organization if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the firm, corporation or other organization has committed a violation.

[See meaning of "person"]

(3)

Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, the period of detention may be only as long as is necessary to:

(a)

Establish the identity of the person, firm, corporation or organization believed to have committed the violation;

(b)

Conduct any investigation reasonably related to the violation; and

(c)

Issue a citation for the violation.

(4)

The authority of an enforcement officer to stop and detain a person for a traffic violation as defined by ORS 801.557 ("Traffic violation") is governed by ORS 810.410 (Arrest and citation). [1999 c.1051 §10]

                      TAKE BACK YOUR AUTOMOBILE TITLE - MCO-MSO 

TAKE BACK YOUR AUTOMOBILE TITLE

Print out the DMV Form for your state in which you domicile to obtain a complete Title History on your automobile. Provide your clear Title, so they can get all the documents together, on that automobile.

What you will receive is a complete Title History on your automobile that includes a copy of the MCO/MSO!

Pay for the 'Certified title history' for each private conveyance of travel erroneously registered as a 'vehicle' for the STATE in which you domicile.

They will give you a packet with their Gold Seal on it, and the MCO/MSO will be at the back of the packet.

Get that Authenticated at your state's Secretary of State (SoS) office, (use a non-Hague country like Indonesia. There is no need to do U.S. SoS);

Then create an 'I Accept the Deed' Affidavit for that Certified Copy of Title History;

Then have a Notary make certified copies of the entire packet;

THEN file one of the Notary copies into the public records office, and have them give you a certified copy of that public record, and keep that in your car!!

You are NOW the true and lawful owner, and the STATE OF _________ no longer has ANY security interest in that car. No law enforcement officer can write you ANY ticket on that automobile, with you being the sole owner.

Currently, the STATE OF ___________________ has a security interest in your automobile, thanks to the ignorant dealerships and fraudulent municipalities that mandate what those dealerships do with the Automobile Titles.

Take back your Automobile Title!

REMINDER:

LEGAL DOCUMENTS ARE ON LEGAL-SIZE PAPER!!!

A court may choose to accept or recognize your document as 'legal' if it is on letter-size paper as a courtesy. However, they are not LEGALLY required to do so. And they will never inform you IF your document has not been accepted as a legal-form due to being on letter-size paper. It is another part of their game of legal deception.

If you think I am being superstitious or silly, think about this for a moment:

Leases, mortgages, loans, agreements presented to you for a home, automobile, insurance, education, apartments, etc. … are ALWAYS on legal-size paper. It is because you are signing/ autographing a legal document.

Invest in LEGAL-SIZE paper to ensure all your legal/lawful presentments are accepted as such.

See affidavit template on the next page:

I Accept the Deed

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL.

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT.

JURAT AFFIDAVIT:

Acceptance, Recognition and Acknowledgement

I: the living woman with the given-appellation Jane-Anna: Doe;

being duly sworn does solemnly affirm, acknowledge, declare, and swear that I accept the Deed for the Certified Copy of Title History for the private property for conveyance of travel referred to as an automobile(s) as attached.

cf. ["The word 'automobile' connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways." American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200.]

While the distinction is made clear between the two as the courts have stated:

cf. ["A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received." International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120.]

The term 'motor vehicle' is different and broader than the word automobile.'"; City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232.

The distinction is made very clear in Title 18 USC 31:

"Motor vehicle" means every description or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, or passengers and property.

"Used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other considerations, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.

Clearly, an automobile is private property in use for private purposes, while a motor vehicle is a machine which may be used upon the highways for trade, commerce, or hire.

WITHOUT RECOURSE / NON-ASSUMPSIT

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / WITHOUT PREJUDICE

All Rights Reserved - Errors & Omissions Excepted

DNA

Autograph by:_____________________________________________

©Jane-Anna: Doe - Living Woman, Sui Juris, Jus Soli .

Principal Secured Party Creditor, Holder-In-Due-Course

Power of Attorney-In-Fact, Master Account Holder .

State of the ____________ republic

County of _____________

SUBSCRIBED and sworn before me on this the

__________ day of ________________ , 20___.

_____________________________

notary public

2015 ORS 153.039¹ 

Stop and detention for violation

(1)

An enforcement officer may not arrest, stop or detain a person for the commission of a violation except to the extent provided in this section and ORS 810.410 (Arrest and citation).

(2)

An enforcement officer may stop and detain any person if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person has committed a violation. An enforcement officer may stop and detain any employee, agent or representative of a firm, corporation or other organization if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the firm, corporation or other organization has committed a violation.

[See meaning of "person"]

(3)

Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, the period of detention may be only as long as is necessary to:

(a)

Establish the identity of the person, firm, corporation or organization believed to have committed the violation;

(b)

Conduct any investigation reasonably related to the violation; and

(c)

Issue a citation for the violation.

(4)

The authority of an enforcement officer to stop and detain a person for a traffic violation as defined by ORS 801.557 ("Traffic violation") is governed by ORS 810.410 (Arrest and citation). [1999 c.1051 §10]

AI takeaway summary:

This text appears to be a comprehensive legal brief challenging the validity of traffic laws and regulations in Oregon, specifically regarding the definition of "driver," "operator," and "motor vehicle." It argues that the state's laws and regulations are based on false premises, misrepresentations, and undisclosed security interests.

The author contends that:

1. The state's definition of "driver" is overly broad and includes individuals not engaged in commercial activities.

2. The state's security interest in vehicles is undisclosed and unlawful.

3. The requirement for a driver's license is unnecessary for private individuals.

4. Insurance is an "out of proportion" tontine scheme enriching the insurance sector.

5. Fraudulent activities by the state and its agents vitiate all contracts and transactions.

The brief provides extensive legal references, including Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) and US Codes, to support its arguments. It also includes a template for an affidavit to accept the deed for a certified copy of title history, aiming to establish the individual as the true owner of their vehicle, free from the state's security interest.

Overall, this text presents a detailed legal challenge to the state's authority over individuals and their property, arguing for the restoration of rights and freedoms.

International Public Notice: Why "Notes"?

 By Anna Von Reitz

Someone asked us today, why does "the US" (which, as a moniker also often carelessly includes the USA, Inc. and other entities as well) issue money as debt notes?  

Why don't they just pay like everyone else and be done with it?  

First it was the "Federal Reserve Notes" and now, they are trying to float "United States Notes" -- and saying that these "notes" are gold-backed. 

Huh? 

If they are "backed" by gold, why not just pay in gold, instead of doing this fox-trot around using private commercial scrip as a substitute?  

Why expect or even ask everyone else to extend them credit based on gold?  And why pay the  interest on all this unnecessary borrowing? 

It's because our Federal Subcontractors can only impose on our credit, not our assets. 

Read the Federal Constitutions --- all three separate documents.  

The States own the silver and the gold under the auspices of the Federation of States. They pay for the services of the Federal Subcontractors in silver or gold.  The Federal Subcontractors use our credit to pay for their bills. 

But there is a catch that nobody is noticing. 

The Congress that is supposed to approve all this spending and all this extension of credit is our Congress, not their Congress(es). 

It's our Congress of States that is supposed to hold those purse-strings, not the Congress of States of States (Confederate States) that is supposed to be running the Confederation, not the United States Congress (1787) that is supposed to be running the Federal Republic and all the "State Republics", not the British Territorial United States Congress known as the U.S. Congress, not the Municipal Congress, either. 

Our Congress. The States in Congress Assembled.  Our States.  Plain old Wisconsin, Texas, Virginia, New York.... 

Not Confederate States. 

Not Federal States. 

Not Republics. Not State Republics

Not British Territorial States of States

Not Municipal STATES

We, our States, our People, are the ones who get to spend our money and our credit, and that has not been happening for a very long time -- slightly more than 160 years, to be precise. 

That is how long our European Federal Subcontractors have been embroidering an unimaginable fraud scheme against our country, lying to us, impersonating us, working unlawful conversion against us, secretly usurping our powers, commandeering our trade policies, declaring war "for" us, and indulging in all sorts of illegal mercenary conflicts "in our names", running up vast unauthorized expenses in our names, and then dumping these expenses on us as if we agreed to them.  

These same False Friends and Dishonest Merchants have acted under color of law to accomplish all of this.  

They have also received our gold under False Pretenses, and pulled the same old Schtick -- oh, we're their representatives, here to collect the gold bond assets that the Pope released for them, here to collect the gold they have on deposit with Citibank, here to..... well, you can all get the picture. 

The Brits and the Romans have been running wild all over creation and pretending to be the Americans and pretending to act for the Americans without a shred of authority or reason to do so.  

They have unjustly enriched themselves, lied to their Employers, misrepresented their Employers, defrauded their Employers, stolen and embezzled and counterfeited against their Employers, illegally confiscated their Employer's property, grossly exceeded any delegated authority we ever gave them, and they are desperately trying to keep their Fraud Scheme rolling.  

Your lawful government has finally unraveled the whole mess and is standing up for you, but you also have to stand up for yourselves. 

In a few days, they intend to offer the world a new kind of "Promise to Pay" someday "Note" -- and the only difference between this "Note" and the "Federal Reserve Note" is that now they are promising to pay in gold, but they still aren't stipulating a specific time when each "Note" is going to be repaid, and they aren't offering to pay in gold that is actually owned by them --- they are offering to pay in gold that is owned by us, the long-lost Americans that they are now desperately trying to evade and suppress.  

We are the people they owe all that gold and credit to, and we are telling them to step back and step down and stop making sounds like they "represent" us.  They don't.  Read the Contracts. 

Where does it say a word about the British Territorial Government printing or minting our money?  Or the Holy Roman Municipal Government, either?  

There is no such authority vested in any of these foreign Federal Subcontractors, and it is plain to see why there isn't. 

Would you just hand your business, your life savings, your own body, everything you own both public and private, to some foreign employees?  

Of course, you wouldn't. 

You'd do that job yourself, unless you were deluded and defrauded into thinking that these people were representing your own dear States of the Union, and buffaloed into believing that they were your legitimate representatives occupying public offices. 

So these "officers" of foreign commercial and municipal corporations under contract to provide us with certain "essential government services" enumerated in their respective Constitutions, breached the trust that their own existence depends on a long time ago.  

And now, they are trying for another round of fraud and misrepresentation. 

They stepped forward, hurriedly, and agreed to receive the gold that the Pope owed to each and every one of us.  He sent back over 650 plane loads of gold bullion which the mercenary "military" received "for" us and rat-holed up near the Canadian Border --- handy for the Brits to move in and steal. 

And now, they are using our gold as the "gold assets" backing their "US NOTES" and trying to replace their own fricking worthless "Federal Reserve Notes" with promissory notes based on gold belonging to American babies. 

They are stealing again from babies. And trying to get the American Native Tribes to front for them and hold the land trust assets. 

It's sickening. 

Everyone on the planet that has been impacted by this gross fraud should vomit and walk away.  And if you are going to lob any nukes, please note, we didn't know about or agree to or do any of the harm that has been done to us or anyone else.  

All this crime was done by what appeared to be "our" government, but instead, was done by European Subcontractors ---the so-called Holy Roman Empire and its Successors, the British Territorial Governments run as venal commercial and municipal corporations worldwide, the British "Crown" Corporation that stole the identities of American babies by copyrighting their Given Names and so, "renamed and redefined" these little tykes as wards of their evil Queen, and used these purloined copyrights to rubber stamp all manner of legal chicanery in the names of the victims.  

These vicious counterfeiters deserve what they get, and no American reading this should have any doubts about it. 

And now we say to you all, every public leader, every business, every country on Earth, these same evil-doers have illegally and unlawfully and immorally latched onto gold reserves that are owed to us, the actual Americans, and are trying to use that gold as the backing for their new debt notes. 

They are trying to weasel any way they can to continue purloining and using our assets right in front of our faces --- for their benefit. 

You would have to be absolutely crazy to trust any of them and even crazier to trust their offers to pay with someone else's money in the future. All they are going to do is try to kill all of us and say that the "funds were abandoned", owners unknown. 

That's the kind of criminals these people are.  This is the kind of game they have played for 300 years. 

Just remember there are no good guys or bad guys in their ranks.  The Dutch East India Company was just as guilty and loathsome as the British East India Company.  Biden and Trump are two sides of the same wooden nickel. 

Don't fall for the Good Cop/Bad Cop game.  We aren't horses, but we are being treated like animals, subjected to the "carrot" (Trump) and the "stick" (Biden).

Don't believe their beating of the drum about any "Republics" --- they aren't building any American Republics.  They are building British Territorial "Republics" and trying to substitute them for ours. 

Just more impersonation, more fraud, more schemes, more substitution frauds, more False Representation, more inland piracy, more unlawful conversion, more theft, more breach of trust, more bull crap. 

Even as we speak, the mercenary "military" is guarding our gold "for" us and offering to use it as the backing for their promissory notes.  

Why not do the right thing and give your Employers back their own assets, deposit the gold that belongs to us in our own treasury, in our own chartered bank system, and let us get on with issuing both actual money and pre-paid credit that we are owed?  

It's our right and we are exercising it. 

It doesn't matter how long we have been quiet. 

It doesn't matter what defunct organization we delegated powers to.  

It doesn't matter how many of us there are. 

We have a "republican form of government" ---guaranteed --- so it is not a democracy and not a numbers game. 

We don't need any British Territorial Mercenaries or British Crown Corporations running our business for us, and we don't need any Bar Attorneys converting our identities and illegally confiscating our assets and running fraudulent court systems on our land, either.  

We wouldn't have left our Airmen First Class without a raise since 1964, except for "Cost of Living Increases". 

Think about that.  

Give us our gold and our credit and you can receive Amnesty for acting in ignorance; but keep on playing the stupid games and taking the stupid orders, and all you are going to get for it is a gibbet as a foreign mercenary engaged as an inland pirate. 

All the rest of the world?  You want an end to the "Overseer" and Slave System?  Want an end to the endless meddling in your business?  Want their hands out of your pockets?  Here is how they are trying to boot it up again. 

The Pope and Queen and British Crown are surrendering everything to the American Indians. 

We, all the other Americans, 85% of the population, are being cast in the role of Overseers for the new Landlords. 

And both the Natives and the rest of us are being set up in this Divide and Conquer strategy, forced to either recreate the same old ugly system of "haves" and "have nots" or fight among ourselves like dogs over a bone --- in which case, they will supply both "sides", bet on the fight and use other mercs to come in and beat the winner.  

Wake up, America, it really is this bad.  Wake up, Europe, you can see it for yourselves.  You know that you've been illegally occupied since WWII. Wake up, Japan!  Wake up, China!  

They are proposing to pay you more promissory notes based on our stolen and purloined gold, just like they proposed to give you land that belongs to us, to pay off their debts. 

It's time to put these mad dog corporations down, convert the mercenary forces back to actual national militaries, and take back what is ours --- our countries, our governments, our assets.  

And remember where they live.  

These Perpetrators, these Arch-criminals, aren't here in hodunk America.  They are in Geneva and Monaco, in Rome, in Venice, vacationing in the Greek Isles, they are in the Inner City of London, Buckingham Palace (named after King James I's homosexual lover, Lord Buckingham) and Kennsington Palace (only slightly more savory) and in Balmoral Palace (advertising that they practice Baal's Morals) and in Washington, DC -- an "independent, international city state" perched on our shores in violation of their landuse permits. 

If you want to get to the root of this evil, it's the banks; if you want to get at the implementation of this evil, it's the banks; if you want to get control of the situation --- and keep it --- give the gold over to the American Federation Treasury and let your Employers get on with their lives and their work.

Nobody on Earth likes the current regimes and crooked practices of the Federales.  Nobody wants more fighting and divisiveness and war-mongering and corporate feudalism.    

We are done with evil.  Today, tomorrow, next week and forever. If you are done with it and want something better with all your heart, then do whatever you can to wake people up, learn what is going on, and shake a leg.  

Stand up and declare your birthright political status. 

Americans can go to the States of America (TASA.org) website to locate their State Assembly; everyone else (including Americans living offshore) who wants sanity and wants to be recognized as a national of their own country, go to www.globalfamily.com and look for the Land Recording and Publishing System (LRPS).  

And as for you Army Guys, don't even think about going through with the Narrative and blowing up  "national monuments" --- especially any dams that will cut electricity and flood everything downstream.

If its time for us to tear down every brick of Washington, DC, we can do it the same way it was built.  No need for waste and bombs and killing of the innocent. 

We were happy to hear that the illegal occupation of our country by British Territorial forces is finally at an end; we don't propose that we should next be snookered into accepting a British Territorial Government acting in our stead. 

This is a worldwide problem and everyone has an equal stake and reason to solve it.  

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

September 18th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 5000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 

International Public Notice: The Treaty of the Blood

 By Anna Von Reitz

A great many lies have been told by a great many people seeking to enrich and empower themselves at the expense of others.  They think they have to push each other down and "get on top". 

So the only way they can get "up" is by pushing someone else "down". 

The truth of the matter is that the land of the entire planet was stolen in 1302 by Pope Boniface the Eighth; we have the evidence of who, what, when, where, how, and why this was done, fully established in public and private records.  

So that is where it started, this idea that someone other than the man living on land owned it and had some kind of control over it.  

The Pope claimed it, and then, the Popes set up governments called "Kingdoms" on the land (after Enki) and "Monarch" on the sea (after Jehovah-Enlil) and "Emperors" in the air (after Anu). All these offices were created by the Popes and all these various government officers were crowned by who?  The Popes. 

This entire bureaucracy and all the land claims established under it began in 1302. It divided the Earth into two spheres (Hemispheres) and three international/global jurisdictions: land, air, and water (LAW) overseen by Kings, Emperors, and Monarchs. 

This system overtook Europe very quickly and spread from Europe to the rest of the world.  

Suddenly we were wondering, where did these all these "kings" come from?  Who are they?  Why are we bowing and scraping to them?  Answer: they were the Overseers appointed by the Popes to rule over the Pope's slaves --- all the lawful, natural living people, who were suddenly denigrated to the level of "Human Creatures".  

This was done to make a distinction between the Popes, the Overseers (Kings,etc.) and the Slaves called "Human Creatures" that the Overseers kept in line for the Popes.  

There were actually two kinds of Overseers -- Sacred and Secular;  The Sacred Overseers were  Ministers (priests, magistrates, etc. operating under Canon Law) and the Secular Overseers were Kings, Monarchs, and Emperors and all their supporters and employees operating under Secular Law in each jurisdiction. 

Long before all this got going in Europe, we all lived under treaties made of blood.  

You still see echoes of this when kids cut their palms and squeeze them together to become "blood brothers" at summer camp or to solemnize particularly binding promises and obligations. 

You also see this in the tradition of arranged marriages and the long history of princesses married off to consolidate the wealth, power, or simply guarantee the peace between kingdoms. 

England made an attempt to create such a Treaty --- and establish such a claim to land and property in America by marrying off one of their officers (a Secular Overseer) named John Rolf to Pocohontas, and thereby secure a claim for the King through John Rolf to Pocohontas' inheritance in America. 

In those days, when a woman married, all of her property was gained by her husband. And if her husband happened to be an Overseer (also called an Overlord if he controlled land estates for the King who controlled it, in turn, for the Pope) everything she owned went to him and from him to his liege-lord, the King.  

This is just an example of how John Rolf was used to secure a claim "for" his King to all the land owned by Pocohontas' Father, the Chief of the Powhatan people, through his daughter. 

But by 1614 when this deal went down, the custom of making Treaties by blood (marriages) was dying out and for many reasons, was disappearing from public knowledge, to be practiced only by the elites, who continued the practice of blood treaties by marrying their own cousins -- and thereby consolidating familial wealth and power. 

A similar but less obvious practice resulted from contracts as "godfathers" and "godmothers". These contracts established in the jurisdiction of the air created a claim to the estates of the godfathers and godmothers for the babies, but also obligated the babies and whatever worldly goods they might have at birth or later inherit, to the Church, standing as a Silent Partner and Trustee, enabled to enforce these obligations and benefit itself from the contracts.  

These were soul treaties, but the concept is eerily the same; instead of blood, the contract was sealed by water. Baptismal water.  The Church acted as the Owner/Trustee of the soul, the godparents acted as the Overseers, and the baby was the Donor of the Assets to the trust--- his body, his labor, his soul, his land, his money, his time on Earth, all neatly snatched away as soon as possible after birth. 

As this system of surreptitious theft and "management" of "resources" refined itself, and because the Pope's particular domain is the air jurisdiction, certificates were issued for these deposits -- a baptismal certificate for the soul (representing all spiritual assets), a territorial birth certificate for the body (representing all physical assets), and a municipal birth certificate for the labor, inventions, and performances (representing the value of our labor and other intellectual and energetic assets).  

This is what the three keys of the Papal Tiara represent -- the enslavement of body, mind, and soul to Christ -- "the anointed one", an office-holder or priest.  

They leave everyone to think that the Christ is synonymous with Jesus and that Jesus is synonymous with Yashua and that Yashua is synonymous with Yahoshua.... but no.  There is really no reason to assume any of that. It's just another Substitution Fraud of the kind we have seen many times since. 

We digress only to demonstrate how we have all been sold a proverbial Bill of Goods and how our trust in institutions and our innocent assumptions, have, together with their sins of omission, been combined to defraud and control mankind. 

Getting back to blood treaties, one specific Blood Treaty needs our attention now -- a Blood Treaty between the Iroquois Nations and the Armorican people of Normandy in France.  

To this day, it is hard to find any member of any Iroquois League tribal nation who doesn't test positive for French ancestry.  

The Amoricans who still live on the southwestern part of the Normandy Peninsula are the ones who gave their name to the new continents of the Americas.  Their blood treaties and trading relationships are memorialized in stories and legends, in petroglyphs (some going back to Egypt) and DNA. 

Scandinavians allied with the Amoricans (both seafaring nations) arrived in North America and began colonizing circa 10,000 BC and became known as the Mound People, white skinned, blue-eyed, and red or blond-haired, these immigrants built large colonies of thousands of people. Their blood treaties account for the blue-eyed, blond-haired individuals who appeared among the black-haired, dark-eyed tribal populations who greeted the "first" European explorers.   

To this day, supposedly full-blood American Indians from tribes all along the Eastern Seaboard and far Inland have traces of Scandinavian and German DNA --- which people assume is of relatively recent origin, maybe back to Viking days, but no, the records are clear.  

DNA occurs in sequence.  It is entirely possible to count approximately how many generations have passed since new DNA was added.  

When we do that kind of analysis, we find that white men have been in this country as long as red, black or yellow men.  And longer than some. 

So before we begin identifying some people as "indigenous" based on skin color and eye shape and language affiliations, and others as "non-indigenous" it behooves us all to look at the DNA evidence, which shows that there is one (1) family of mankind, one (1) common Mother from whom we all inherit our mitochondria, and no reason to assume that any one race or religion or people are indigenous to any one region. 

In fact, the DNA evidence proves that ultimately, we all came from Africa.  So a strong and rational argument can be made that anyone living outside of Africa is non-indigenous. 

We are bringing this forward to stop the Old One-Eyed Bastard from fooling everyone again and starting another round of the same old game of Divide and Conquer and setting up the same old system of Landlords, Overseers, and Slaves. 

They do this by arbitrarily choosing new shills to act as Landlords, and establishing a new "elite" to work as Overseers for the Landlords, and leaving everyone else as Slaves. 

Is this what we want to perpetuate?  Or are we ready to progress to a better world and be better people? 

Those including the Holy Roman Empire hegemony promoting all this "indigenous versus non-indigenous" talk know what they are doing and they are spinning a narrative and taking advantage of racial bigotry and festering abuse to promote it.  

All to keep our attention away from the fact that the "Great Divide" is never among living people.  The Divide is between living people and corporations. 

There's only one mankind, and we have all been manipulated and defrauded and enslaved and deluded enough not to realize this and act upon it. 

So let's take a step back and look at the 1613 Blood Treaty and the Sea Treaty back to the King of England that present claims are built upon --- and realize that the name "The United States of America" derives from "The United Nations of America" ---- a body that existed for hundreds of years prior to any modern European system of Kings and Monarchs and Emperors. 

The Blood Treaties of the Americans go back at least to 800 AD in this country, not 1613.

These Nations were the Iroquois Nations and their affiliates all the way down to Florida in the South and the Northern Plains ---- and also, their kin, by marriage and Blood Treaty going back more than a thousand years, the Amoricans.  

They established The United Nations of America also called The Iroquois League circa 800 AD and their problem then and now, was trading with the remnants of the Roman Empire. 

Their seasonal meetings took place in the area now known as Philadelphia every year.  This is why our capitol is in Philadelphia.  This is why this country is called America.  And this is why the unincorporated government of this country in international and global jurisdictions is called The United States of America.  

"Nation" refers to the living people, and "States" refers to the land.   

But before you get confused: 

There are two such entities that claim the land -- The United States of America which is our lawful and unincorporated government --- which is American and which has never been incorporated at all. 

And "the" United States of America, which is British and which has been incorporated for many years. 

It is this second, foreign business that has usurped upon our lawful government, stolen our identity, abused our flag (or at least one version of it, their Territorial Title IV flag)  and which is responsible for so much of the misery and injustice that has crippled the whole world. 

It's not the Americans (Amoricans) who stole the land from anybody.  That distinction belongs to the Brits.  

It's not the Americans who were defeated at little Big Horn.  That too, was the Brits and their Territorial Flag. 

It wasn't the Americans who gave anyone any blankets impregnated with smallpox during Prince Philip's War or any time afterward.

It wasn't the Americans who herded up native children and sent them to residential schools. All of this violence and cruelty and greed and nastiness is and always was, the Brits -- first under their kings, and last under their political party executives parading around as corporate "Presidents".  

How do we know this, when everyone else seems stupefied?  

The Belle Chers were the Kings of Gaul and they have remained hereditary Kings of Normandy and central England. The Amorican people are our people---- in what is now called France and in what is now called America, and wherever they may roam. 

It's our DNA mingled throughout the far reaches of this country and our claim to it by Blood Treaty and our symbols and names carved into these rocks and our sons and daughters who have been misled and abused by the Overseers of the Popes. 

Our claims in the modern world are lodged in favor of the living people, those with hands and feet, and against the corporations that have been raised up to steal from us and enslave us.  

So when certain leaders rant and rave against the Europeans and accuse "Americans" of stealing their land --- remember that it wasn't us who stole anything.  

It was the Pope, it was his priests, it was his kings, his monarchs, and his emperors-- and all their minions and armies and officers, all working to unjustly enrich and empower themselves by  "claiming title" to other people's names and property.  

Remember that we had and we have, by Blood Treaty, every right to consider ourselves "indigenous" and landowners and free people in this country and wherever our DNA flows and our name is invoked.  

Remember that a Blood Treaty overstands all other forms of treaties and is valid on air, land, and sea. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

September 18th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 5000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.