How not to loose it all in Real Estate

 https://youtu.be/SOxWsQzIEqA

Get out of the banks and buy Silver NOW!

 

 We have two options for you to get Silver. 

 

 https://quicksilver.me/296110 

 

 Or call to order 500 or more ounces at 406 889 3183 

 

 Paul Stramer pstramer@gmail.com

Second Sunday After Epiphany

Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's The Church's Year In the Introit of this day's Mass the Church calls upon all creatures to thank God for the Incarnation of His only-begotten Son. INTROIT Let all the earth adore Thee, O God and sing to Thee: let it sing a psalm to Thy name (Ps. 65:4). Shout with joy to God all the earth, sing ye a psalm to His name: give glory to His praise (Ps. 65:1-2). Glory be to the Father and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen. COLLECT Almighty and eternal God, Who disposest all things in heaven and on earth: mercifully hear the supplications of Thy people, and give Thy peace to our times. Through our Lord Jesus Christ Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee, in the Unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end, Amen. EPISTLE (Rom.12:6-16). Brethren: We have different gifts, according to the grace that is given us: either prophecy, to be used according to the rule of faith, or ministry in ministering, or he that teacheth in doctrine, he that exhorteth in exhorting, he that giveth with simplicity, he that ruleth with carefulness, he that sheweth mercy with cheerfulness. Let love be without dissimulation. Hating that which is evil, cleaving to that which is good: loving one another with the charity of brotherhood: with honor preventing one another: in carefulness not slothful: in spirit fervent: serving the Lord: rejoicing in hope: patient in tribulation: instant in prayer: communicating to the necessities of the saints: pursuing hospitality: bless them that persecute you: bless and curse not. Rejoice with them that rejoice, weep with them that weep: being of one mind, one towards another: not minding high things, but consenting to the humble. Be not wise in your own conceits. EXPLANATION. St. Paul in this epistle exhorts every Christian to make good use of the gifts of God; if one receives an office, he must see well to it, so that he can give an account to God of the faithful performance of his duties. He exhorts especially to brotherly love which we should practice by charitable works; such as, receiving strangers hospitably, giving alms to those who are in need, and to those who by misfortune or injustice have lost their property; he commands us, at the same time, to rejoice in the welfare of our neighbor, as we rejoice at our own good fortune, and to grieve at his misfortunes as we would over those which befall us. How is brotherly love best preserved? By the virtue of humility which makes us esteem our neighbor above ourselves, consider his good qualities only, bear patiently his defects, and always meet him in a friendly, respectful, and indulgent manner. Humility causes us to live always in peace with our fellowmen, while among the proud, where each wishes to be the first, there is continual strife and dissatisfaction (Prov. 13:10). INSTRUCTION FOR SUPERIORS Those have to expect a severe sentence from God, who merely for temporal gain, seek profitable offices, and thrust themselves therein whether capable or not, and if capable care very little whether they fulfill the duties required, or perhaps make the fulfillment of them depend upon bribes. Of such God makes terrible complaint: Thy princes (judges) are faithless, companions of thieves: they all love bribes, they run after rewards. They judge not for the fatherless; and the widow's cause comes not into them (Is. 1:23). A most severe judgment shall be for them that bear rule (Wisd. 6:6). ASPIRATION Grant us, O Lord, Thy grace, that according to Thy will, we may follow the instructions of St. Paul in regard to humility and love, have compassion upon all suffering and needy, think little of ourselves, and descend to the lowest, that we may, one day, be elevated with them in heaven. GOSPEL (Jn. 2:1-11). At that time there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee: and the mother of Jesus was there. And Jesus also was invited, and his disciples, to the marriage. And the wine failing, the mother of Jesus saith to him: They have no wine. And Jesus with to her: Woman, what is it to me and to thee? my hour is not yet come. His mother saith to the waiters: Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye. Now there were set there six water-pots of stone, according to the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three measures apiece. Jesus saith to them: Fill the water-pots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And Jesus saith to them: Draw out now, and carry to the chief steward of the feast. And they carried it. And when the chief steward had tasted the water made wine, and knew not whence it was, but the waiters knew who had drawn the water; the chief steward calleth the bridegroom, and saith to him: Every man at first setteth forth good wine; and when men have well drank, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee: and manifested his glory, and his disciples believed in him. Why was Christ and His mother present at this marriage? In order to honor this humble and God-fearing couple who, with faithful hearts, had invited Him and His mother to their wedding; to give us an example of humility; to assist them in their poverty, and save their good name by changing water into wine; to reveal His dignity as the Messiah to His disciples by this miracle; and to sanctify by His presence the marriages that are contracted in the spirit of the Church. Alas! how few marriages of our time could Jesus honor with His presence, because He is invited neither by fervent prayer, nor by the chaste life of the couple: He is excluded rather, by the frequent immorality of the married couple and their guests. Why was Mary interested in this married couple? Because she is merciful, and the Mother of Mercy, and willingly assists all the poor and afflicted who fear God. From this incident, St. Bonaventure judges of the many graces which we can hope for through Mary, now that she reigns in heaven; "For," says he, "if Mary while yet on earth was so compassionate, how much more so is she now, reigning in heaven!" He gives the reason by adding: "Mary now that she sees the face of God, knows our necessities far better than when she was on earth, and in proportion to the increase of her compassion, her power to aid us has been augmented." Ah! why do we not take refuge in all our necessities to this merciful mother, who although unasked assists the needy? Why did Christ say to Mary: Woman, what is it to me and to thee? This seemingly harsh reply of Christ was no reproach, for Mary had made her request only through love and mercy, and Christ calls those blessed who are merciful, but he wished to show that in the performance of divine work, the will of His heavenly Father alone should be consulted. He meant to remind her that He had not received the gift of miracles from her as the son of woman, but from His eternal Father, in accordance with whose will He would do that which she asked when the hour designed by God would come. Though the hour had not come, yet He granted the wish of His mother, who knew that her divine Son refused none of her requests, and so she said to the servants: "Whatsoever He shall say to you, do ye." Behold the great power of Mary's intercession! Neglect not, therefore, to take refuge in this most powerful mother! What are we taught by the words: My hour is not yet come? These words teach us that we should in all things await God's appointed time, and in things belonging to God and His honor, act only by divine direction, without any human motives. What does the scarcity of wine signify? In a spiritual sense the want of wine may be understood to signify the lack of love between married people, which is principally the case with those who enter this state through worldly motives, for the sake of riches, beauty of person, or who have before marriage kept up sinful intercourse. These should ask God for the forgiveness of their sins, bear the hardships of married life in the spirit of penance, and change the wrong motives they had before marriage; by doing so God will supply the scarcity of wine, that is the lack of true love, and change the waters of misery into the wine of patient affection. Why did Christ command them to take the wine to the steward? That the steward, whose office required him to be attentive to the conduct of the guests, and to know the quality of the wine, should give his judgment in regard to the excellence of this, and be able to testify to the miracle before all the guests. ASPIRATION O my most merciful Jesus! I would rather drink in this world the sour wine of misery than the sweet wine of pleasure, that in heaven I may taste the perfect wine of eternal joy. INSTRUCTION ON THE HOLY SACRAMENT OF MATRIMONY What is Matrimony? Matrimony is the perfect, indissoluble union of two free persons of different sex, for the purpose of propagating the human race, mutually to bear the burdens of life and to prevent sin (I Cor. 7:2). Who instituted Matrimony? God Himself, the Creator of all things (Gen. 1:27-28). He brought to man the helpmate, whom He formed from one of the ribs of Adam, that she who came from his heart, might never depart therefrom, but cling to him in the indissoluble bond of love (Gen. 2:18, 24). To this original, divine institution Christ refers (Mt. 19:4-6), and the Church declares the bond of marriage perpetual and indissoluble. Is Matrimony a Sacrament? Yes; according to the testimony of the Fathers, the Church has held it such from the times of the apostles, which she could not do, had Christ not raised it to the dignity of a Sacrament. St. Paul even calls it a great Sacrament, because it is symbolical of the perpetual union of Christ with His Church; and the Council of Trent declares: "If any one says that Matrimony is not really and truly one of the seven Sacraments of the Church instituted by Christ, but an invention of men that imparts no grace, let him be anathema" (Conc. Trid., Sess. XXIV, can. 1). What graces does this Sacrament impart? The grace of preserving matrimonial fidelity inviolate: the grace of educating children as Christians; of patiently enduring the unavoidable difficulties of married life, and of living peaceably with each other. Married people are indeed greatly in need of these graces, in order to fulfil their mutual obligations. What is the external sign in the Sacrament of Matrimony? The union of two single persons in Matrimony, which according to the regulations of the Council of Trent (Conc. Trid., Sess. XXIV, can. 1), must be formed publicly in the presence of the pastor, or with his permission before another priest, and two witnesses. What preparations are to be made to receive the grace of this Sacrament? 1. The first and best preparation is a pure and pious life. 2. The light of the Holy Ghost should be invoked to know whether one is called to this state of life. 3. The parents and the father-confessor should be asked for advice. 4. The choice should be made in regard to a Christian heart, and a gentle disposition rather than to beauty and wealth. 5. The immediate preparation is, to purify the conscience, if it has not already been done, by a good general confession, and by the reception of the most holy Sacrament of the Altar. Before their marriage the young couple should ask their parents' blessing, should hear the nuptial Mass with devotion, with the intention of obtaining God's grace to begin their new state of life well, and finally they should commend themselves with confidence to the protection of the Blessed Virgin Mary and her spouse St. Joseph. Why are there so many unhappy marriages? Because so many people prepare the way by sins and vices, and continue to sin without interruption, and without true amendment until marriage, therefore always make sacrilegious confessions, even perhaps immediately before marriage. Besides this many enter the married life on account of carnal intentions, or other earthly motives; in many cases they do not even ask God for His grace; without any proper preparation for such an important, sacred act, on their marriage day they go to church with levity and afterwards celebrate their wedding with but little modesty. Is it any wonder that such married people receive no blessing, no grace, when they render themselves so unworthy? Why did God institute married life? That children might be brought up honestly and as Christians, and that they should be instructed especially in matters of faith; that married people should sustain each other in the difficulties of life, and mutually exhort one another to a pious life; and lastly, that the sin of impurity might be avoided. For they who in such manner receive matrimony as to shut out God from themselves, and from their mind, and to give themselves to their lust, as the horse and mule which have not understanding, over them the devil hath power (Too. 6:17). 'With what intentions should the married state be entered? With such intentions as the young Tobias and his bride had, who before the marriage ceremony, ardently prayed God for His grace, and took their wedding breakfast in the fear of the Lord (Too. 14:15). Hence God's blessing was with them until death. If all young people would enter the married state thus, it would certainly be holy, God-pleasing and blessed, and the words of St. Paul, spoken to wives, would come true unto them: Yet she shall be saved by bearing children, if she continue in faith, and love, and sanctification with sobriety (I Tim. 2:15). Why are the bans of marriage published three times in Church? That all impediments which would render the marriage unlawful may be made known. Such impediments are: consanguinity, clandestine marriages, etc. Therefore, any one who is aware of such impediments, is bound to make them known to the pastor. Why is the marriage performed in the presence of the parish priest? Because the Catholic Church expressly declares that those marriages which are not performed in presence of the pastor, or with his permission before another priest, and two witnesses, are null and void (Conc. Trid., Sess. XXIV can. 1)1; and because the blessing of the priest, which he imparts in the name of the Church, gives the couple, if they are in a state of grace, strength, fortitude and grace to be faithful to each other, to endure all trials patiently, and to be safe from all the influences of the evil enemy." Why do they join hands before the priest, and two witnesses? By this they bind themselves before God and His Church to remain true to each other, and to be ready to assist each other in all adversities. The bridegroom puts a ring on the bride's finger which should remind her of her duty of inviolable fidelity; to this end the priest signs and seals this holy union with the unbloody Sacrifice of the New Law. Can the bond of marriage be dissolved in the Catholic Church? A valid marriage, contracted with the free consent of each of the parties, can according to the plain doctrine of the Scriptures, the constant teaching and practice of the Church, be dissolved only by the death of one of the parties. If the pope or a bishop, for important reasons, gives a divorce, this is only partial, and neither can marry again while the other lives. Such a marriage would not be valid. How pure and holy are the doctrine and practice of the Catholic Church in this the most important and sacred of all human relations, preserving its inviolability and sanctity; while, on the contrary, by means of the wanton doctrine of the heretics, which for trivial reasons entirely dissolves the marriage contract, this sacred union is made the deepest ignominy of mankind, and the play-ball of human passions and caprice! What is thought of mixed marriages, or marriages between Catholics and Protestants? The Catholic Church has always condemned such marriages, because of the great dangers to which the Catholic party is unavoidably exposed as well as the offspring. Such marriages promote indifference in matters of religion, by which the spiritual life of the soul is destroyed; they are a hindrance to domestic peace, cause mutual aversion, quarrels, and confusion; they give scandal to servants; they interfere with the Christian education of the children, even render it impossible, and they frequently lead to apostasy and despair. But the Catholic Church condemns especially those mixed marriages, in which either all or a number of the children are brought up in heresy, and she can never bless and look upon those as her children who do not fear to withdraw themselves and their own children from the only saving faith, and expose them to the danger of eternal ruin. Therefore, those Catholics who enter the matrimonial union with Protestants, although the marriage if lawfully contracted is valid, commit a mortal sin if they permit their children to be brought up in heresy, and should it not be their full intention to bring up their children in the Catholic faith at the time of their marriage, they would commit a sacrilege. What should the newly married couple do immediately after the ceremony is performed? They should kneel and thank God for the graces received in this holy Sacrament, in such or similar words: "Ratify, we beseech Thee, O Lord, that which by Thy grace Thou hast wrought in us, that we may keep that which in Thy presence we have promised unto the day of our Lord Jesus Christ." That they may keep their promise made at the altar, they should always remember the duties laid down to them by the priest at the time of their marriage, and the exhortations which are taken from the epistle of St. Paul to the Ephesians (Eph. 5:29, 31), wherein he instructs married people how they should comport themselves towards each other, and recalls to them as an example the union of Christ with His Church, and His love for her. To the husbands he says, they should love their wives as Christ loved His Church, for which He even gave Himself up to death; from this is seen, that men should assist their wives even unto death, in all need, and not treat them as servants. To the wives St. Paul says, that they as the weaker should be in all reasonable things obedient to their husbands, as the Church is obedient to Christ; for as Christ is the head of the Church, so is the husband the head of the wife. Experience proves there is no better way for women to win the hearts of their husbands than by amiable obedience and ready love, while, on the contrary, a querulous, imperative deportment robs them of their husbands' affections, and even causes them to be regarded with aversion. St. Paul says further; that husbands should love their wives (and consequently wives their husbands) as their own bodies, because married people are, as it were, one. They shall be two in one flesh; no man ever hated his own flesh, but nourisheth and cherisheth it, as also Christ doth the Church (Eph. 5:29, 31). How unjustly and barbarously do those act, who, instead of loving one another, rather hate and outrage each other, and cause the loss of their property, and by detraction steal their honor! These do not consider that he who hates and disgraces his partner in life, hates and disgraces himself; while according to the words of St. Paul he who loves her, loves himself. If married people would remain in constant love and unity, it is most necessary that they should patiently bear with each other's infirmities, wrongs, and defects, exhort one another with mildness and affection, keep their adversities, trials, and sufferings as much as possible to themselves, and complain in prayer only to God, who alone can aid them. By impatience, quarrels, and complaints the cross becomes only heavier and the evil worse. Finally, not only on their wedding day, but often through life, they should earnestly consider that they have not entered the married state that they may inordinately serve the pleasures of the body, but to have children who will one day inhabit heaven according to the will of God; as the angel said to Tobias: "For they who in such manner receive matrimony, as to shut out God from themselves and from their mind, and to give themselves to their lust as the horse and mule, which have not understanding, over them the devil hath power" (Tob. 6:17). PRAYER Most merciful Jesus! who didst work Thy first miracle at the wedding in Cana by changing water into wine, thereby revealing Thy divine power and majesty, and honoring matrimony: grant we beseech Thee, that Thy faithful may ever keep sacred and inviolate the holy sacrament of Matrimony, and that they may so live in it truthfully, in the fear of the Lord, that they may not put an obstacle in the way of obtaining heaven for themselves, and their children. 1. In all such dioceses of the United States, where the Council of Trent has not been published, civil marriages are considered valid. The Catholic, however, who becomes married by civil authority commits a mortal sin, except in case of extreme necessity. To be married by a sectarian preacher is looked upon as a denial of faith, and incurs excommunication.

 

Spider, Spider .... Zoning is a Good Example

 By Anna Von Reitz

Just because one group of people submits to something, doesn't mean that everyone else is obligated to do so.  

Just because one group of people decides to live under a theocracy, doesn't obligate everyone else to do so. 

Just because another group of people decides to live under a foreign democracy, doesn't obligate everyone else to do so. 

We may not be able to convince them that they are wrong or mistaken in their allegiances, but we can certainly tell them where their rights end and ours begin.  

Back in the 1970's the Roman Municipal STATES OF STATES, which had no authority to exist,  began a "zoning program" which placed land in "zones" for residential, commercial, or agricultural use.  

And everyone living in these newly created "zones" was supposed to comply and be taxed at the rate established for each "zone".  

The problem is that they had no right to extend any authority in the States. Period. They try to excuse their activities by saying they aren't in the State, they are in the Territorial State of State.  But the Territorial State of State is in the State. So, good try and no banana. 

Lacking the right to be here, they have no right to promote tax schemes and land use restrictions, either -- except with respect to property owned by their actual employees and actual dependents.

They choose to live in "zones" and in a Roman city-state ruled over by a pagan theocracy?  Okay, if that is what you buy into, jump to it. 

But really, these folks need to learn their limitations when it comes to imposing upon others.  

Same thing with all the British Territorial United States Citizens who want to live in a democracy and "reside" in a State-of-State and be Subjects of the King of Britain ("Britain" by the way, isn't a place -- just another corporation). 

By all means.  Jump to it.  But they have no reason or right to intrude on the rest of us, force their law on us, fail to live up to their contractual obligations to us, or occupy our land and soil without our express written permission.... 

The only people they have any right to impose demands upon are strictly delineated and defined by  treaty and by contract. 

And none of their treaties or contracts extend to telling us one word about our use of our land. 

There are relatively few British Territorial U.S. Citizens --- far fewer than all those who have been secretly mischaracterized and registered as such -- and once we get this basic "mistake" cleared up, there is really no reason that we need to palaver any more about zoning or land use or property taxes. 

That's all restricted to their own citizenry, too. 

So, here we go, and poor Pastor Avrell is trying to help the homeless and is being assaulted with no less than eighteen criminal charges for zoning violations.... see the link below. 

Here's the check list of questions: 

Is Pastor Avrell serving an incorporated church?  

If so, that church is a US CITIZEN and subject to all the zoning blather, and he might as well plead guilty, pay the fines, and give up helping the homeless using anything -- including his Office, "Pastor" -- or any other church property. 

Second, is the property in question owned by an incorporated church? 

If so, see above. 

Third, if the church that Pastor Avrell serves is not incorporated, then it is not a "US CITIZEN" and is not liable to obey zoning restrictions.  

And his office is not owed to the Roman Municipal Government, either.  

So he can tell them to blow "zoning restrictions" out their ears, because they don't apply to him or the property being used to shelter the homeless -- so long as the land/buildings being used are paid for free and clear and he holds proper title and not a commercial bank.  

If a commercial bank still has a lien against the land and property as a result of loans taken out to buy it, then the bank is liable and has an ownership interest and so, you are back to Square One, admit guilt, pay fines, apologize, give up efforts. 

There is on other Balrog's Tail and that is pre-existing agreements granted to a Homeowner's Association at the time the property was acquired -- and Pastor Avrell will need to check on this, too.  

There may have been a codicil in the purchase agreement requiring the buyer to abide by all zoning restrictions or other restrictions set by the HOA. 

But, having escaped the clutches of the Roman Municipal Government Subcontractor, what if the second tier "government" of the British Territorials comes around?

The questions are similar. 

Has Pastor Avrell established the "Chain of Title" he holds to his unincorporated Church property?  And, having established the chain of title and claimed it, has he taken steps to publish his ownership of the Land Grant or Land Patent underlying the chain of title? 

If he owns the Land Grant or Land Patent free and clear he can tell them to take the same action as the Roman Municipal Government --- if and only if -- he has also taken the time to straighten out his own political status records and reclaimed his original birthright political status.  

This is because the British Territorials among us have been willy-nilly snatching every baby they could snatch, and writing those babies up as if they were born to British Territorial U.S. Citizens, instead of being plain old Americans.  

That False Registration then makes the (actual) Americans into British Territorial Subjects and any land that they own in this country is held in trust by the British King and the British King is in thrall to the Pope, just like the Roman Municipal Government, and if the Pope says, "There shall be zoning!" -- and you are a British Territorial U.S. Citizen, guess what?  

See first instance above.  Plead guilty, pay fines, etc. 

You have to free yourself from all doubt or supposition that you in any way owe citizenship obligations to either the King or the Pope, and you must claim back your birthright interest in your own identity and estate as an American, and you have to pay off any foreign indebtedness, and you have to establish your chain of title and you have to publish your ownership of the land grant or patent, and you cannot be acting as any sort of foreign incorporated entity at all ---- and THEN, finally, you can tell all these busy bodies to go stuff themselves.  

Not until. 

If his church is not incorporated and doesn't owe any money on the premises in question, Pastor Avrell can, with a little effort, mount a serious defense. He can record (never register) his birthright political status, research the chain of title, publish his patent, and tell them to take their "criminal charges" to the owners of the PASTOR AVRELL Crown Corporation Franchise, and, by the way, here's who I am...  

And did they know that it is (Royal) MAIL FRAUD to address MAIL to foreign persons and persons not associated with the Territorial or Municipal Government?  So as to entrap them into answering foreign summonses to foreign courts that hold no valid jurisdiction? 

Just saying. 

It's difficult, but not impossible for Americans to win through and have the freedom their are heir to, but with all the False Registrations and Enrollments they've been coerced into, and the general level of ignorance on all sides, it's a job and a half, and not everyone can do it. 

Usually, like this poor soul, they have no idea of the consequences of incorporating a church. Or a man. 

They have spent their whole lives imagining that they are free, when in fact they have been enslaved by gangs of foreigners, who are themselves enslaved. 

And like it that way. 

So, Pastor Avrell is trying to do something good, but the masters of all the incorporated entities, including incorporated churches, could give a fig about "good". 

What they care about is profit and improving the value of their assets. Yes, their assets, because according to you, you gave them your assets by registering them, by using them as collateral to borrow against, by enrolling in "Federal" retirement programs, by answering their "Summons" sent to you by intergovernmental MAIL.... 

They could care less about homeless people, because if they valued people at all, they wouldn't be homeless in the first place. Take that to the bank. 

Still, there is nothing quite like the look of abject terror on their faces when they finally realize that you know what they've done, what they've alleged about you, and what they owe you as a result.  

And that can be worth all the bother of disentangling yourself from their webs and squashing the spider dead. 

https://www.wnd.com/2024/01/town-prosecuting-church-pastor-helping-people/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=wnd-newsletter&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=newsletter&ats_es=5c2611d34638a419dddde47c6216068b&ats_ess=c848f740bdc03d5f347c2b41d5002dd7ada926028097d9a0ae47589ca6e219a4

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Step by Step Analysis

 By Anna Von Reitz

In 1840, Queen Victoria married Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, which was one German marrying another, while sitting on the English throne. It has remained that way ever since, and that may be why they haven't cared how neglected the English Throne is or how bad the British Government looks to the rest of the world. 

The Germans have been able to engineer all this dirty work behind the Brits back, just as the Brits have endeavored to perform their malfeasance and war-mongering behind ours. 

Shortly after his marriage to Queen Victoria, Prince Albert --- in possession of his wife's property and fortune --- consolidated and modernized British banking and the Royal fortunes and cut deals with the British Crown leading to the incorporation of the banks and their redefinition as investment banks dealing in securities.  

This was in keeping with what was going on at the time on the Continent, and especially with the big banks in Hamburg. 

This change also involved standardization of the names and conventions used to designate corporations and human beings and living people throughout the then-British Empire to bring them into compliance with British Grammar and Corporate-ese. with the result that in 1851, for Federal purposes, the name of this country operating in National Jurisdiction was changed from "the United States" to "The United States" in accord with English Grammar. 

This left two other entities still using the name "United States" --- the corporate but unincorporated American Federal Subcontractor doing business as "the United States" and the Roman Municipal Federal Subcontractor also doing business as "the United States". 

This enabled the Roman Municipal Subcontractor to seamlessly usurp upon the American Subcontractor when the American Federal Republic ceased operations as a result of the Mercenary Conflict that the British Territorial Municipal Corporation dba "the United States of America, (Incorporated)" started on our shores in 1861.  

Similar changes took place at the same time regarding the name "United States of America".  

The name of our unincorporated Federation of States remained: The United States of America.  

The name of the British Territorial United States entity remained "the United States of America"; but in addition to this name for the Territorial Government, they added a new incorporated entity calling itself, "the United States of America (Incorporated)" which was chartered under the auspices of the British Territorial Government.  

It was this entity, "the United States of America, (Incorporated)" that Abraham Lincoln was President of, and which he declared bankrupt in April of 1863. 

Remember that Lincoln was no American President of any kind.  He was not President of our Federation of States, nor was he President of the American Federal Subcontractor known as the Federal Republic.  He was President of the British Territorial Subcontractor doing business as "the United States of America (Incorporated)".

This was further confirmed by his action bankrupting that entity in April of 1863: he couldn't be operating as President of the Federation or the Federal Republic, either one,  and seek bankruptcy protection -- a privilege of incorporated entities only.   

So all British Territorial interest in the proceedings of the Civil War were severed at that point and it was left to the remaining American troops enrolled as mercenaries from the Several States to finish the job while the Brits were in receivership to their creditors. 

This also means that the Brits, fighting for the "North",  lost the substantial part of any claim to benefit from the conquest; they were riding on our State-of-State coat tails from then on. The victory -- such as it was-- didn't belong to them or their creditors, either.  

The American mercenaries forged on, via improperly presenting themselves as honorable soldiers and claiming expenses from the American States-of-States organizations -- which of course, passed the cost onto the States, which never agreed to any of this. 

Our States never declared war and never got involved in the so-called Civil War, but as a result of these dishonest charges made against our treasuries by the American States-of-States, we got stuck paying for most of it. 

This circumstance makes our States the Priority and Preferential Creditors from then until now.  It was our money commandeered to finish the "war" -- and our States and people who were imposed upon by the States-of-States organizations extending our credit without our permission to do this. 

Thus, a State of the Union, like Wisconsin, through the offices of The State of Wisconsin, got billed for the expenses of supporting the Wisconsin contingent of mercenaries enrolled to fight in the Civil War -- and those running The State of Wisconsin knew they had no business making these charges, because the actual State wasn't involved in any such "war" and didn't condone it.  

Sooner or later, this malfeasance would be discovered and The State of Wisconsin would owe the actual State an insurmountable debt.  

This is exactly what happened after the successful  Armistice, but note: not a Peace Treaty ending the armed hostilities--- because there wasn't ever a Peace Treaty and couldn't be a Peace Treaty to end an illegal Mercenary Conflict. 

By then,1865-68, the British Territorial contingent, encouraged by this acrimony between The State of Wisconsin and Wisconsin (for example) and the paralysis of the American Federal Subcontractor, proposed, with the help of its own bank creditors, to take over and launch their own version of a State-of-State known as "the State of Wisconsin" and to coerce Wisconsin to accept their services instead. 

This required rewriting The Constitution of The State of Wisconsin so that it became "The Constitution of the State of Wisconsin".  

This same pattern of the British Territorial interests coercing the State Government to rewrite their Constitutions to allow this was applied throughout the country. 

By 1868, the two foreign Federal Subcontractors, British Territorial and Roman Municipal,  had split up the duties of the paralyzed American Federal Subcontractor awaiting Reconstruction; the British Territorial United States Government had become the operator of all the State-of-State concessions, and unauthorized British Territorial [Military] District Courts had been spread across the land. As a final element of the fraud practiced against this country, a Scottish corporation doing business as The United States of America (Incorporated) was booted up and used to impersonate our Federation of States. 

They simply neglected to add the word "Incorporated" to the name, and the banks smirked and looked the other way.  In this way, the criminals responsible for this whole debacle gained access to our credit in exactly the same way that a credit card hacker does it --- via impersonation. 

The banks are totally, one hundred percent responsible for this horrible fraud against our people and our country. It could never succeed without their participation and they knew it.  They demanded their cut and are damned by it. 

What became of the American Federal Subcontractor known as The Federal Republic? 

It was inoperable, because its sponsor, the States of America organization operating as the Confederation of States from 1781 to 1860 was inoperable -- left without a quorum.  The Federal Republic fell because the Confederation fell. 

And both stayed down and were never Reconstructed because the remaining Federal Subcontractors were up to no good. 

We've seen what happened to the original American State-of-States which were members of the Confederation -- being subsumed by Territorial versions, so that The State of Vermont, for example, an American Service Provider, was replaced by "the State of Vermont", a British Territorial Service Provider. 

What happened to the actual States and their Federation of States doing business as The United States of America? 

The foreign States-of-States used their Legislatures to govern instead of accepting the direction of the State Assemblies.   Over time, they latched onto the assets of each State by forming State Trusts and cashiering the assets -- land, soil, people, cash, cars, etc. -- in the State Trust, and using these assets and other items of infrastructure as collateral for them to borrow against.  

State Assemblies were redefined in the foreign system spawned by these Usurpers as advisory bodies that met once every two years to consider 

infrastructure spending and other odd things that only a land jurisdiction body politic could decide. 

In this way, they endeavored to promote the idea that the State Assemblies still existed as intended and still directed and approved major capital expenditures, long after their State-of-State Legislatures had usurped all actual power over the assets in the State Trusts and dubbed themselves the Trustees. 

Later, in the 1930's, another whole layer of phony "state" government was added, and the American people were saddled with the expense of Municipal STATE OF STATE government franchises, so that the Territorial State of Tennessee was operating at the same time as the Municipal STATE OF TENNESSEE. 

The people of Tennessee, deprived of their own American State of State known as The State of Tennessee, got stuck paying for the services of two interlopers, neither one of which had any actual consciously accepted and voluntary contract. 

The British Territorials were thus reigning as the Trustees over a State Trust that the people never created and never appointed them to manage, and these foreign interests were spending lavishly on all sorts of investments through their investment banks --- all financed on the physical assets and labor assets of Americans -- and also sending the bill for all this "service" to the Americans, but never affording the victims of this scheme with even a cut of the proceeds rolling off of it, year after year. 

Instead, the people funding all this were "mistakenly" identified as British Territorials, Protestants "lost at sea" and "presumed dead" and everyone was caught up in Henry the Eighth's old double-cross fraud scheme, benefiting the King as the Pope's Overseer with 40% of the "take" and 60% going back to the Pope.  

And all this while, the American people and their government weren't told a whisper about any of these cozy arrangements made for them by their erstwhile public servants. 

Not a word. 

The men responsible for running the Federation of States were hunted down in the waning days of the armed conflict and immediately afterward, accused of crimes they never committed, ambushed, burned out, murdered outright, by "Union Army" thugs in civilian clothing. Those that survived and carried the memory of the Federation with them hid out on the edges of the Great Plains in places like Montana and the Northwestern States and later, Alaska.  

They kept on the run for more than a century and passed down knowledge of the actual structure of our government by word of mouth.  It's to them that we owe this "remarkable resurgence".  They never forgot, and neither will any American.  

When the two layers of interloping foreign government "service providers" organized as Municipal Corporations went bankrupt yet again, we lifted our hands and refused to contract with any Successors that these organizations propose, and wished for the Perpetrators to be punished and ineligible for any privilege to incorporate as much as a dog house concession. 

We have properly provenanced our Assembly members, they have declared their birthright political status, and assembled our State Assemblies. 

We have insisted that our foreign public employees get back in their boxes and stop usurping against their Employers, that these presumptions and arrangements imposed upon us without our knowledge or consent, come to an end, and that the corporations responsible for the harm and expenses be forfeited for the benefit of the victims of this bizarre monolithic attempted theft of our National Identity and theft of our credit and assets for the unjust enrichment of our European Employees. 

For some years now, these Perpetrators have been using the United States Mail owed to our American Subcontractor, and absent that Subcontractor to the Federation of States, to promote crimes of illegal confiscation, mail fraud, false arrest, unlawful conversion, racketeering, identity theft, and more.  

The MAIL has been routinely substituted for the POST and nobody has been taught the difference. Intergovernmental MAIL has been deliberately misaddressed to private people to promote the idea that they are government employees or dependents, when they are not, and when the victims innocently assume that this MAIL is being addressed to them as POST, they are seized upon by the foreign courts as "subject matter", railroaded, and robbed. 

These same Perpetrators send deceptive court summons to their own District Courts and State-of-State Courts concerning foreign State-of-State Persons and foreign ESTATE trusts that have been named after these same Americans without any disclosure. 

When the victims innocently assume that this [Royal] MAIL is addressed to them and respond, the courts and agencies "presume" that they are too ignorant to defend themselves and begin their whole constructive fraud scheme song and dance. 

We wish for these courts to be shut down and the people running them to be fully and permanently informed regarding their limitations and liabilities.  

The Perpetrators send tax notices owed by these trusts named after the American victims and they racketeer against the Americans to pay up or else. They send armed "security personnel" hired by their commercial service corporations to evict people from their homes on the presumption of debt that these people never owed, and these "troopers" and "police" and "sheriffs" masquerading as legitimate public peacekeepers don't even know that they are doing anything wrong. 

They are kept as ignorant as the people they prey upon. 

This is all related to a practice of black magic using "poppets" or voo-doo doll-like representations of the living man or woman -- "personal trusts" -- to impose the debts of fictional entities on people who have had no disclosure that any of this was going on behind their backs, and who cannot defend themselves as a result. 

Prince Albert's dream of a clean and orderly financial system and a sensible uniform nomenclature for living, corporate, and incorporated entities, has gone terribly and violently astray.  

So have public employees in every branch and capacity.  

These terrible errors must be corrected without further delay and those responsible must make amends.  

The courts must be severely reprimanded and brought back to serve the cause of justice, not Justicia, a pagan Roman goddess.  This means among other things, that the so-called Department of Justice devoted to "Justicia" needs to be dissolved or lawfully converted without delay.  

The "Department of Justice" is an in-house corporate subcontractor of the District of Columbia Municipal Subcontractors, providing the District of Columbia Municipal Corporations with Legal Services that these same corporations have repeatedly failed to pay for, and dumped back onto the American Public via bankruptcy fraud.  

If they don't pay for their own Legal Services contracts, those contracts need to go away, and everyone needs to understand that the "public" responsible for their frequent, deliberate bankruptcies, is not the American Public.  

It's the British Territorial U.S. Citizens and the Municipal citizens of the United States responsible for those corporations and their spending, and there are very few of them compared to the numbers of people who have been deceitfully "registered" and "enrolled" without disclosure and enslaved and subjected to peonage to pay for their employees'  unauthorized, reckless, and unaccountable spending.    

The so-called Law Enforcement personnel must be fully-informed of their limitations and stand down from any more illegal and unlawful confiscation activities.  The Legislatures need to be reminded that we and our courts sit in judgment over them and their misapplied codes, statutes, and regulations. 

We have done our part in good faith and more than good faith for well over a century and endured all the harm inflicted by this gross breach of trust, violation of service contracts, bad faith, and fraud; we now require restitution for ourselves, remedy, cure and maintenance for our employees, and both compassion and redemption for the loss and damage done to us from the loss and conscription of the  nephesh-portion of our soul's labor as debt payments that we never owed.  

We are fed up and so is the entire world.  All this black collar and white collar fraud has run its course. 

This criminal misapplication of law, the impersonations, the theft of our labor and latching upon our assets, the venal pretensions and non-disclosures in breach of trust that have led to this -- have got to end. 

We are The United States of America --- Unincorporated.  Free.  The Last Man Standing. We are the Priority Preferential Creditors. 

We invoke our rights and guarantees, our treaties and our contracts, our lawful and legal interests, all assets, trusts and debts owed to us, all beneficial interest whatsoever that is owed to us, as well as the forfeiture of all Municipal Corporations in the District of Columbia or established as their franchises anywhere in the world, subject to lawful conversion (that is, nationalization) for their crimes and breaches of contract.  

Insomuch as other countries have been impacted by this same constructive fraud scheme and we have wound up claiming their franchises, we have developed fair and simple means for the living people and their lawful governments to reclaim their assets and their credit. 

We are not -- repeat, not -- proposing to continue any of this fraud and malfeasance for any reason whatsoever.  Our intention is to clean up the mess and have done with it, now and forever. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

January 13th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.