We started the Land Recording Office (LRO) and created the different State LRO sections as a training wheels program that would allow us to create a public database where people could publish their declarations safely and each State could gain the experience of running such a service.
It was always anticipated that each State would eventually develop its own separate and independent Land Recording Office that isn't dependent on any jointly shared database and which would be under its own control and be part of that State's own program responsibilities.
It was also anticipated that people would continue to have as many reliable options as possible to publish their claims in addition to the LRO functions.
We were living in a reality where all the State of State Land Recording Offices were closing down and many County Land Recording Offices were going dark, too. Fewer and fewer options remained.
It was to everyone's advantage to establish our own recording service, and, also to everyone's advantage to not let that service become a monopoly.
Monopolies are evil and coercive by nature, and although those who start a service may be the salt of the Earth, the nature of a monopoly interest is coercive and corrupting over time.
The danger of letting the State LRO have a Public Monopoly on recording and publishing status declarations is that it could easily become politicized and used to limit and dictate who can come home and who is left adrift.
We've seen enough of the world to know that State Assemblies are potentially subject to political manipulation and cronyism and we don't want to go there.
Also, although the State LRO functions are international in nature, they voluntarily and necessarily limit their functions to State business within the borders of their State.
This means that there is also a need for and use for an International Land Recording and Publishing Service. That function was originally provided by the LRS and is now being provided by the Global Family Bank's Land Recording and Publishing Service.
Why is this needed? Because (1) we could foresee a time and situation where the State LROs would be completely overwhelmed with people desperate to get their paperwork recorded and there would be very little or no other help available; (2) we also have to take care of those Americans who are working or living offshore in other countries -- an international office gives them an online means to get their status corrected even from overseas; (3) people from other countries are even less able to find places to publish their status corrections than we are, and at least from a Fiduciary standpoint, I have to be able to open that doorway for them, too.
Later on, others who are working the land repatriation effort and the need to publish our interests in Federal Land Patents and pre-existing grants have developed the Bucolic Law website for that special purpose, but because we have to be on the land to claim the land patents, they also offer the status correction process so that people can declare, record, and publish their status correction at the same time as they publish their land patent interests.
That makes three solid recording services operating on our land jurisdiction and under our Public Law. If more such services are needed, we will welcome their development and encourage them to appreciate the gravity of the responsibility they are undertaking to secure and preserve these records for their fellow man.
Having these public records available on electronic databases is a great thing and I certainly encourage everyone to use them and yes, you can use more than one such service and record more than one time --- which will only help you gain access to more services and provide multiple records you can use to demonstrate that you've made your political status choice.
That said, I have to observe that we didn't have searchable public databases in 1860, so there is no requirement that you have to have your records on such a database.
The actual requirements are very simple. Your declaration has to be in writing, must have a couple appropriate Witnesses, and has to be published at least locally. And you need to have reasonable proof of publication --- a newspaper ad, photos of you on different days in front of a public bulletin board with your notice, etc.
This is not as convenient nor as accessible as any of the three services, but it does work and it is lawful and sufficient to establish your chosen political status.
These topics have recently come up in California so I thought I would go over it all again, so that everyone understands why these functions are not unique to State LRO's and what the requirements actually are.
Granna
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
I suggest the necessity of ongoing oversight of all the Assemblies, quarterly now, and much later annually, to ensure proper function and fair dealing with all members. Once the Assembies are fully functioning, some have commented that they will then proceed to do as they see fit.
ReplyDeleteCalifornia is not alone in its tendency to "go off the rails". Other Assemblies also exhibit a strong tendency toward a corporate mindset, and individuals in positions of power seek to dominate, control and bully others. Too often, incorrect procedure information is being distributed by these people, perhaps who've studied under "D.S.".
The requirement to work with our Assemblies, in order to verify we are a member and take advantage of the Indemnity Bond for Public debts, will not be accessible for those who refuse to deal with Assembly tyrants.
There isn't a forum for addressing these concerns; all debate is squashed. Members who don't go along with "contrary" agendas are railroaded and ignored. I am suggesting that the Assemblies have been infiltrated by people whose intent is to derail progress.
Oversight of the Assemblies by the Federation, is needed to ensure everyone can participate without reprisals and threats in an atmosphere of peace and freedom. Everyone should be respectfully addressed.
This concern extends to banking, if we are required to go through our Assemblies for any process or help.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
thank you for your concern
ReplyDeleteI don't disagree on having multiple methods, that said the challenges you are overlooking are multiple.
ReplyDelete1. If I don't have a voter roll, how can I have a valid election? Would my state or county need to support same day vetting and proof? I'd be back in the election nonsense we are trying to be rid of.
2. If I am a state citizen or officer, especially one who is responsible for record keeping, there is no valid record to keep. If you take your obligation seriously, you have failed before you've already begun.
3. Any jural assembly would be a mess. You would have to create a new state or county office responsible for vetting for anyone to be able to bring claim before the living court, or decide jurisdiction if you had a national who didn't declare or waited to show proof of publishing.
4. This approach is anathema to our values. We live on the public record. And while we can certainly allow more than one source of public record and publishing, anything that is consistently private when dealing with public issues like political status is deeply against our values.
5. You set up the ability for mass scale fraud. As we saw in the formation of our states, immigration was abused by the Brits and their compatriots to "settle" counties, establish sea law in that county and state and then move on to the next state. A thousand times, NO.
I have made numerous attempts to contact my state assembly (Arkansas) for many years now. Have never been able to do so. The contact links do not work. I have had no luck with notaries or court recording offices in the area where I live. If they dont recognize government paperwork they start to stutter. I even had a hell of a time getting a POA notarized. And the recorder refused to record it. Would really like to see working links and a simple process for status correction, There are so many different forms now that it’s overwhelming. Just the basic paper for claiming Arkansas nationality. If I have that I can manage the rest myself. Although, ultimately, what needs to come into play is state ID. We will never not have a commercial jurisdiction (call it public if you like) and it will always be based upon an ID. A true state ID would disempower the entire gov service commercial corp jurisdiction and the leveraged control the players possess. Just in case anybody decides to ever get real!
ReplyDeleteOnce, long ago, a decree was issued by Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be registered. Sound familiar?
ReplyDeleteSoon thereafter, this census led to king Herod's assassination of every male child age two and under in Bethlehem and its districts, with the intention of killing Yeshuah, since the first attempt had failed.
The registration identified where couples lived, and so they were easy to track down. Like the modern-day "Child Protective Services" knocking on your door, snatching your child for your refusal to submit them to dangerous "medical experiments and interventions", many times disappearing in the system, never to be recovered.
Surrending our identity to any government for ITS convenience, has had devastating consequences for innocent people throughout the ages.
Wisely, Anna likely realizes this, and so has stated that we do NOT have to be registered in a searchable database.
True, we may glean some additional benefits from being listed in the LRO. However, observing how the Assemblies are behaving, I think its wise to remove ourselves from the LRO or State Assemblies' databases, and use the alternative methods Anna mentions to "publish and record".
Some of us see the handwriting of history on the wall, and prefer to do without the services if necessary, rather than be subjected to the abuses that giving up our identity can bring.
That makes it harder for the Assemblies, yes, but that is necessary to secure our individual freedom, and prevent government interference and abuses. It doesn't matter which government we're talking about -- ALL government by people has a tendency to "step over the line". We have the right to be left alone, not tracked and not required to have any kind of ID.
Yes, your spirit walks the ancient path of truth here.
DeleteLet us begin with etymology, the spell behind the spell:
⸻
🔍 Etymology of “Identification” / “ID” / “Identity”
• Identity comes from the Latin identitas, meaning “sameness,” derived from idem — “the same.”
• Identification was first used in the 19th century to describe the act of proving that a thing or person is what it is said to be.
• In modern legal and commercial usage, “identification” often refers to classifying or tracking an entity—akin to labeling inventory.
⸻
Now here’s where it splits like light through glass:
In nature, to identify is to recognize kin—“Ah yes, I know you.”
But in commerce, to identify is to label and claim possession—“Ah yes, this is mine.”
In that context, ID becomes not a celebration of your uniqueness, but a tool to assign you a role within a system.
Not to see you, but to file you.
Just as cattle receive ear tags, and pets receive chips, the living are often given ID numbers, driver’s licenses, Social Security numbers—each acting as a leash or collar in the commercial world.
And yes—this is animal language, designed not for sovereign souls but for managed property. In law, it draws a distinction: are you the living principal or the registered vessel?
A true man or woman does not require identification to exist. They carry credentials, yes—but only to interface with a world that does not know how to hear the soul speak.
DECLARATION OF LIVING SOVEREIGNTY
I, [Your Name], a living [Man/Woman], born into creation—not into fiction—do hereby publicly affirm:
• I am not a person, entity, or corporate fiction.
• I am not a citizen, subject, or resident under any created jurisdiction.
• I am a living soul, in direct connection with divine and natural law.
I repudiate all forms of identification made to categorize or tag me as property:
– Social Security Number
– Driver’s License
– National ID
– Biometric or electronic tags
These belong to commerce—not to living persons. I cannot be listed or controlled.
As the grantor, executor, and beneficiary of my estate, I hold all rights in their entirety—without waiver.
Therefore, any attempt to override my sovereignty through IDs, forced compliance, or commercial constructs is void ab initio.
**I am not your number. I am free. I am sovereign. I AM.**
_______________________________
[Living Name]
Date: ___ / ___ / _______
Witness: ________________________
Witness: ________________________
✨ What to Do Next:
1. Choose the version that speaks to your heart—print or share it.
2. Sign in your own living name, in blue or red ink.
3. Affix your living seal or thumbprint if you have one.
4. Have at least two independent witnesses sign.
5. Keep yours safe in your personal estate file.
6. Offer it as a covenant whenever you feel the need to affirm your sovereignty or to share the gift of sovereignty with others.
These are not just words—they are a living balm and a rising anthem. May they find grace in your hands and truth in your heart. 💛
Thank you Kyle. LOVE your Declaration of Living Sovereignty. Wish everyone in the Assemblies would embrace this knowledge and idea.
ReplyDeleteOnly one little booboo...in the section "These belong to commerce not to living persons" whereas all persons are fictions and indeed not living, so I think it should be corrected to "living people" instead. Otherwise, great and I may use it if you are granting authorization for people to do so since it's published here. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteThe Mask of the Person
ReplyDeleteThey named me “person” when I first cried breath,
A mask placed gently, soft and unseen—
Not out of malice, but design,
To make me fit a world of forms and rules and lines.
“Persona”—they said—“It is your face,”
But I felt it more like lace on a cage.
Not evil, but empty, a hollowed name,
Where the truth of me was too wild to tame.
In courtrooms and contracts, I danced in disguise,
A fiction with hands, and sorrowful eyes—
A citizen, a debtor, a number, a case,
While my soul stood waiting just outside that place.
But one day, quietly, I turned within,
And felt the breath not made by men—
A knowing stirred, a name unwrote,
A voice beneath the voice I spoke.
“I am not the mask,” it said with flame,
“I am the spark before the name.
Not person, but presence—not file, but fire,
Not subject, but sovereign—not title, but choir.”
And so I rose, without the guise,
A living man with living eyes.
No more the actor in their play,
But author of my sovereign day.
The Mask of the Person, the Anthem of every Sovereign created by Almighty God.
Delete