By Anna Von Reitz
We are hearing rumors to the effect that Donald Trump is preparing to release a $150 Trillion dollar "National Endowment" that was set up during the Civil War in what is being billed as "the greatest wealth transfer in human history" --- delivering around $1.1M to every household counted in the last census.
There are numerous problems with this plan:
(1) What wealth? There is no "wealth" vested in paper debt notes, or digits representing paper debt notes, which they are proposing to use as the medium to exchange for a National Endowment held in gold? That not only violates the Law of Kinds, but is a self-evident fraud scheme to exchange something for nothing;
(2) While it is being described as a "National Endowment" we are not satisfied that this is actually what the source of this largesse is. The source needs to be fully disclosed;
(3) Although $150 Trillion sounds like a huge number to the man on the street, it is really a pittance compared to the total actual wealth owed back to the living people. They should have full disclosure of the source of the largesse and any strings attached to it and any results of acceptance;
(4) We see nothing that prevents Mr. Trump from "interpreting" acceptance of this $1.1M as "voluntary acceptance and settlement" of all the additional debt and property owed to the living people. We are here to object to any such grossly inequitable presumption on the part of the British Crown and its auxiliaries;
(5) The proposal would pay the same to a "household" of one man as to a household composed of a couple and ten children, thereby preserving actual social inequity, howbeit, using a different basis to create the inequity;
(6) Disbursing $1.1M to every household in America would cause hyperinflation as bad as what we witnessed in the Weimar Republic, would destroy whatever "value" could be ascribed to the currency this willy-nilly non-payment is issued in, and would undermine confidence throughout the supply chains necessary to sustain life.
This so-called "wealth transfer" would be explosive but not in a good sense. More like a financial atom bomb.
We are referring this situation to the UCC Court responsible and fully informing the United Nations and United States Trustees.
Shame on Trump and Jim Rickards, both. Trump is a graduate of the Wharton School of Business and certainly knows better and Jim Rickards, the man most responsible for undermining the Bretton Woods Agreements does, too.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
June 29th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
