Anna Von Reitz
I have been missing for a week and a half while hosting and attending and mopping up after a major conference here in Alaska. The attendees -- both those physically present and those chiming in via teleconference-- were all experts in either Common Law or Admiralty Law or in some cases, both, and they all had both real world experience and specific specialties to share. Best of all, everyone present was present for the right reasons, so we didn't have to deal with any egoes or pandering in our pursuit of truth and remedy. We all just came to the table and worked like madmen (and madwomen) for a week.
The weather was glorious, the company inspired. The results are still filtering out--- with some being immediate and apparent, and others being spurred along to the next step. The discussions covered the following topics: identity theft, banking and foreclosure fraud, political status, Common Law Remedy and Process, Admiralty Law Remedy and Process---- not necessarily in that or any other order.
General Court Procedures: Anyone and everyone who has been railroaded (or is being railroaded) through an Admiralty Court process on the false presumption that you are acting as the agent or representative of any commercial PERSON needs to file a Notice of Withdrawal of Appearances (telling them that you are not an agent and withdrawing any action that presumes that you are) and a Notice of Non-Representative Capacity.
These two Notices work in tandem--- one withdrawing any appearance that you were an agent of or acting as an agent for the DEFENDANT, the other clearly stating that you are a Third Party Intervenor. You identify your Third Party interest as Doe, Doug George (your Name in this form) doing business as Doug George Doe, an American Tradesman operating on the land jurisdiction of the ___________State.
You can also issue a Notice of Non-Combatant Status in which you accept the sections of the Lieber Code one through thirty inclusive, identify yourself as a non-combatant Virginian, Ohioan or Texan or Wisconsinite, and relieve the judge of any obligation to enforce the Trading with the Enemy Act and accept instead his Oath to protect and defend the Constitution.
If you are at the beginning of a court action, you can also issue a Motion in Limine as a Third Party Intervenor making a Special Limited Appearance. In this Motion you require that anyone bringing charges against the DEFENDANT must prove the nature and identity of the DEFENDANT and provide their evidence of the DEFENDANT'S nature and identity to you prior to proceeding.
Now, this is basic due process in all courts and all venues. How can a court proceed without establishing who or what the parties to an action are? Logically, they can't. If, however, the Judge denies your Motion in Limine he is caught during the defense measures and has to allow your evidence regarding the nature and identity of the DEFENDANT---- which neither he nor the prosecutor want revealed, because it will prove that they have been engaging in attempted personage and barratry and have been knowingly misaddressing their charges to you---a man who is exempt from their charges and alien to their jurisdiction.
These simple Notices and provisions are deadly, like rat poison for a rat, and they have been 100% effective in all cases where they have been properly invoked. The risk to the judges and attorneys trespassing against you is simply too great for them to proceed so these cases are routinely dismissed and prior judgments voided.
It took a week to develop these nuggets for you and it will take at least a week to convey them and probably another week to answer questions related to them. Please be patient with me. All my other work continues on at the same pace in addition to the work from the Alaska Conference.