Is the controversy over building a mosque near ground zero a grand distraction or a grand opportunity? Or is it, once again, grandiose demagoguery?
It has been said, "Nero fiddled while Rome burned." Are we not overly preoccupied with this controversy, now being used in various ways by grandstanding politicians? It looks to me like the politicians are "fiddling while the economy burns."
The debate should have provided the conservative defenders of property rights with a perfect example of how the right to own property also protects the 1st Amendment rights of assembly and religion by supporting the building of the mosque.
Instead, we hear lip service given to the property rights position while demanding that the need to be "sensitive" requires an all-out assault on the building of a mosque, several blocks from "ground zero."
Read the entire article here:
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=1077
Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Politicians all make the claim they will defend the constitution. But only a handfull, when the opportunity presents itself, do so consistantly.
ReplyDeleteWhile we will piss and moan about it, come every other Nov. we will again re-elect the same crap.
Through our own vote we have taught them that we will settle for lousy representation.
It's sad, Americans claim to love freedom, but too few, fully understand what freedom is.
The truth is the vast majority only favor their version of freedom.
Someone smarter than I said it this way;
"You can protect your liberties in this world only by protecting the other man's freedom. You can be free only if I am free."
Clarence S. Darrow (1857-1938) American lawyer
Jeff