International Public Notice: Complete Confusion Explained

 By Anna Von Reitz

Put on your History "Thinking Cap" and revisit the nineteenth century, looking especially at nineteenth century public utility (electricity, etc.) and public transportation (railroads and omnibus development) and mining operations.  

Here you will find the concept of "the Company Store" --- a system by which a corporation employed workers, and then also required those workers to buy virtually everything they needed from a store run by the same corporation, thus creating a monopolistic economic micro-climate.  

The worker was circumstantially enslaved.  The employing corporation controlled everything --- his wages, his hours, his work assignments, and at the end of the day, he could only buy his personal supplies from the Company Store, which also limited his access to commodities to pre-approved brands and pre-approved amounts. 

A Chinese immigrant employed by the Great Southern Railroad Corporation as a lineworker in 1906 was limited to buying a certain number of pounds of rice per day --- not with money, but with company issued grocery vouchers --- and only rice of a specific brand, provided by a specific supplier, was available. 

No other store would accept the company-issued vouchers. 

These micro-climate monopolies were very, very profitable and offered instant coercive powers that would make Genghis Khan blush.  

These corporations controlled every aspect of their employees' lives ---and profited from every aspect of their employees' existence.  

Like a modern factory farm, the entire "organism" was exploited for profit and managed by coercion -- from birth to death, and in every aspect, people were treated like farm animals, managed, exploited, and in the end, discarded, while the industrialist masterminds became unimaginably wealthy and exercised god-like coercive powers over the masses of people they employed and controlled.  

Enter labor unions.  Enter wage and hour laws.  Enter social reform. Enter free trade and anti-monopoly legislation.  Enter "human" rights, quite apart from the natural and unalienable rights of mankind.  

For those who remember the past, the present is not hard to recognize as a repeat off all these repugnant nineteenth century practices on steroids, a vastly expanded and generalized form of Robber Baron Capitalism and a situation in which the remedies of the past have failed, because the Perpetrators moved their operations to a different jurisdiction of law in order to evade their social obligations and evoke a different form of law more amenable to their operations.  

Today, they run entire countries -- entire domestic economies -- as "company stores", controlling every aspect of consumer choices and consumer access, and profiting all the way to the colluding central banks and back.  

There's a reason the CIA calls its parent corporation "the Company" and a reason why the British Crown Corporation is called "the Firm". 

This is all grossly unlawful under American Land Law and also illegal under American Admiralty Law, but by controlling the American Bar Association, the Perpetrators of these abundant crimes against humanity and against the interests of National Governments, have contrived to "redefine" things in a manner that benefits them at the expense of the people they are supposed to serve in "good faith". 

Because private corporations have been left in control of public functions, a form of upside-down-and-backward administration results.  Instead of the Employers telling the Employees what to do, the Employees are calling the shots, determining their own wages and benefits, and organizing everything to best benefit themselves--- regardless of the cost to their Employers and culture at large. 

Of course, it benefits them to control everyone and everything, especially as they can charge off the cost of enforcement and surveillance and their whole "command and control" structure to the victims of their schemes.  It also benefits them to manage entire national economies as monopolies that are not questioned or fully perceived by the victims. 

The most obvious and prevalent monopolies of this kind are enforced as "currency monopolies".  

Let us reiterate.  Salmon P. Chase, Lincoln's Treasury Secretary, the man who is still lionized by Chase Bank, advocated the creation of the Greenback, a fiat currency.  Then, the Treasury created "1040 Bonds" that offered exceptional returns on investment ---and added the requirement that these bonds could only be purchased using Greenbacks.  

The Greenbacks were paid for in gold, and then, secondarily, used to purchase the 1040 Bonds.  When the victims sought to cash out their highly lucrative 1040 Bonds --- what happened?  

General Sherman asked, what did you use to pay for the 1040 bonds? 

Greenbacks.  

Then why, he asked, would you expect to be paid back in gold?  

Gold was exchanged for paper having no actual value, that paper was exchanged for Treasury Bonds, more paper having no actual value, and then the Treasury Bonds were paid out in what?  More paper. 

The Shell Game succeeded in hiding the "nugget".  

The gold was essentially stolen.  The investors were deceived. Something of physical value and substance was exchanged for paper, that paper was exchanged for other paper -- Treasury Bonds based on the value of the victim's own labor -- and the investors were duped into paying for everything via their own enslavement. 

It's brilliant and also highly criminal. 

The same old schtick was dusted off and used to create a variation in much more recent times ---the so-called Petro Dollar.  

The Saudis agreed to sell all their oil to the Federal Reserve and therefore only accept Federal Reserve Notes as payment for crude oil; the rest of the oil producers in the Middle East followed suit.  

Thus, if you wanted to buy oil, you had to convert your money -- gold and silver -- into Federal Reserve Notes which are?  Paper representing the debts of an unknown Municipal corporation calling itself the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".  

Hmm.... same old story, being forced to convert something of physical substance and actual value into paper, in order to buy something else.  

Gold converted into Greenbacks to buy Treasury Bonds, which are redeemed as more Greenbacks. 

Gold converted into Federal Reserve Notes to buy oil. 

In each case a Third Party Currency Monopoly is established by the Seller of a commodity --- Treasury Bonds in one case, the Saudi Government / OPEC oil in the other case. 

This swindle is only made possible because traditionally, the Seller of Goods or Services has the right to demand payment in whatever form they desire.  

Thus, the U.S. Treasury demanded payment in Greenbacks, just as the Oil Producers demanded payment in Federal Reserve Notes.  

If you get enough Sellers demanding payment in your Third Party currency, it becomes "the Reserve Currency" and this same schtick is then applied to all the other currencies in the world.  

The scary thing about this is that all any government has to do is create or own a product, service, or commodity that everyone else needs for whatever reason, and you can set up the same scheme. 

The Chinese have moved to corner the world's silver commodity supplies and in days to come will demand payment for value-added products containing silver in specific currencies -- probably BRICs currencies or Yuan.  

Just as "the US" demanded payment for value-added petroleum products In Federal Reserve Notes. 

Anyone, as China and Russia have noted, can play this game and unjustly enrich themselves, simply by restricting free trade via the exercise of the Seller's privilege to demand payment in a specific currency. 

Once everyone gets in on the act, consumers will have to pay for flour in one currency and fuel oil in another, and each one of these artificially created micro-monopolies will take an arbitrary toll on consumers. 

Another way to look at it, is that the Third Party Currency Monopolies are a form of Tariff exercised at the currency exchange level; everyone is left paying in actual goods (precious metals) to obtain paper "intellectual property assets" that are the arbitrarily demanded payment sought by the Seller of a commodity or service. 

It works the same way whether the Seller is the U.S. Treasury selling Treasury Bonds for Greenbacks, or the Oil Emirates selling crude oil for Federal Reserve Notes or the U.S. selling refined oil products for Federal Reserve Notes or the Chinese selling computer chips and batteries that require silver the Chinese are now hoarding to create a silver supply monopoly they can exploit to ensure the continued dominance of Chinese technology products.... 

People all over the world are harmed by Third Party Currency Monopolies and all the Company Store Monopolies and commodity supply monopolies and it all boils down to obstruction of free trade based on the Seller's sacrosanct right to demand payment in a form that is acceptable to them. 

This "choice" on the part of the Seller has been politicized and weaponized against other countries and against consumers --- and the end result has been the destruction of free trade and fair trade, both. 

The League of Nations tried to prevent this outcome by creating conventions that accept International Bills of Exchange without limitation to specific currencies, and many land jurisdiction governments passed laws against monopolies and monopoly inducement, and against obstruction of free trade, generally.  

The entire bulk of Federal Title Fifteen attempts to address these issues and to both punish obstruction of trade and support free trade against the influence of monopolies and illegal interlocking trust directorates.  

How, you may ask, is it possible that these evils have been recognized for centuries -- literally -- and all these countries have all these laws and conventions and treaties against monopolies and against obstruction of trade, and yet, these crimes only grow and spread? 

Failure to enforce. 

The Perpetrators of these circumstances switched the jurisdiction in which they are operating and were thus enabled to access a different form of law that allows them to evade their Constitutional obligations and consider enforcement of the Public Law "discretionary". 

We are here to tell the British Privateers (and the original Men in Black) that enforcement of the Public Law is not discretionary.  

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994 

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

January 9th 2026

------------------

See this article and over 5700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Bureaucratic Chiseling Unmasked

 By Anna Von Reitz

Back in the 70's a scheme to provide a "sin tax" related --and regulated-- economic engine for Native American tribes was instigated in the form of Federal Gaming Acts, which allowed tribes to establish casinos and run them for profit.  

This license to run gaming houses created an instant ad hoc partnership between tribal leaders, government bureaucrats, and the Mob -- mostly New York Mob at first, later, Russian/Eastern European Mob and Drug Cartel  encroachers.  

This was both a move to integrate Native Americans into commercial operations and access supplemental income to relieve government bureaucrats of their obligation to provide for people forced to be dependent on the public dole.  And casinos make money.  Everyone likes money.  

So, there we all were, young and dumb, facing the era of Native-run casinos, first a few created in the traditional gaming destinations like Nevada, and then, over the years, sprouting up like mushrooms all over the country.  

Most native leaders adjusted and tried to focus on whatever positive attributes their casinos provided to communities -- looking at it in terms of the hospitality industry, providing hotel accommodations in places that needed such facilities, using casino auditorium and dance hall space for a wide variety of community-related purposes, providing a place for family fun and restaurants, not just hardcore gambling.  

By the time all this started, the "Reservation System" --- another polite bit of verbiage to describe what started as illegal open-air internment camps --- was becoming more and more expensive and its failure in human terms was becoming more public, more difficult for "the U.S." to explain or justify to the rest of the world, including all the other Americans who looked at it and objected to the repugnant colonialist crimes underlying it.  

The relatively few white people who supported the American Indian Movement (AIM) and the occupation of Wounded Knee and other protest activities at the time --- people like my Mother --- did so from a profound awarements of the injustice the Native People suffered, but that awareness had yet to expand into larger international venues.  It was the combined threat of that expansion and the cost of maintaining the reservation system that prompted the establishment of the Native Gaming Commission.  

At the time, my Mother and others raised red flags, saying that even the government corporation's proposed remedy --- which was giving the native tribes a franchise license to do something otherwise illegal and providing the Mob Bosses with a new venue --- was not fair or appropriate. 

This "business opportunity" forced native people to take a slice of dirty pie, or continue to have no slice at all.  

The quid pro quo also required onerous reporting requirements, and paying local, state, and federal bureaucrats large sums as  "taxes" and "payments in lieu of taxes".  So even the slice of dirty pie was shared out among voracious corporate bosses like the Daley Clan in Chicago -- or Gavin Newsom and the Pelosi Clan in California -- all "representing" the government, of course. 

This uneasy and unavoidably unsavory lifeline has puttered along for over fifty years, and now, a combination of new income streams, declining overall economic conditions, and the freedom to be honest, is creating a domino effect resulting in the closure of casinos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irCZkV7unN8

It turns out that government bureaucrats were padding their extraction of "tax" payments to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars that went into the ethersphere --- money extracted from the native tribes that were supposed to be the beneficiaries of the gambling licenses.  Not only did the government bureaucrats extract payments that weren't owed, they exercised authorities they didn't have.  

Today, justice is finally, quietly, emerging.  

Not a big fanfare.  Not something that is calculated to take the front page.  It's just this: 214 casinos are closing in California alone, and many more will close throughout all the other States.  

The casino facilities that remain as physical edifices will provide new opportunities, free of the forced associations and phony tax obligations of the past.  

The governmental services corporations and their bureaucrats owe the Native casinos all the tax money that was collected under False Pretenses, plus interest.  

Simply closing the doors of the casinos and providing the opportunity for new purposes for these facilities --- while stopping the drain of casino profits into undisclosed foreign coffers -- is probably the best revenge.  Quiet.  Dignified.  No need for further explanations. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

January 7th 2026

------------------

See this article and over 5600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Brits at the Bottom of Every Dog Pile .... Again and Again and Again

 By Anna Von Reitz

We are not the only ones who early on identified the actual Enemies of Humanity, those who are consistently and always at the bottom of every dog pile, every act of violence, every war-for-profit, every colonialist oppression. 

There was Susan Kokinda (sp?) and Promethean Action zoned in on the same realization.  

We know about Venezuelan oil and why the USA, Inc. needs closer crude oil to maintain its market in refined oil products.  We know that in the short term, Venezuelan oil can make a strategic difference for the Western Hemisphere, which, after all, includes Venezuela.  We know that Venezuelan silver is at least an equal prize in the so-called "resource war".  

But there is something else going on, the quiet dismantling and rearrangement of an offshore banking empire that began prior to the American Civil War, and which has been the means of promoting a criminal mercantile syndicate that has killed millions of people and has aimed at killing billions more.  

If Suzie Q. is right, Trump has just bitten the Big One right in the butt: 

https://youtube.com/shorts/HWNnVvMear8?si=WIIbbOORLIQJ0EzT

And yes, we do agree with her that Venezuela is a "node" in the web of international piracy, money laundering, drug trafficking, and human trafficking that the British offshore banking cartel supports: 

https://youtube.com/shorts/_DuJ8J-bPII?si=Gw___p7dcTHouGgy

Quite apart from any commodity-based resource hoarding or monopolization scheme, there's the offshore banking scheme that is the foundation and Mother of Them All.  

If we can penetrate the records in Venezuela, we will shortly have the whole story, front to back, bottom to top, from the World's Fair to the British Throne.  And back again. 

Please stay tuned in and follow the threads covering all aspects of this story.  Stay open, stay alert.  Set your Shinola Sensor on "High" and join the daily Rat Watch 2026 effort! 

Granna

------------------

See this article and over 5600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: What is "the Fourteenth Amendment"?

 By Anna Von Reitz

Most people think that the so-called Fourteenth Amendment is a legitimate amendment to the service contract known as The Constitution of the United States of America issued in 1789.  

This idea is understandable, especially as it was calculated and presented in a manner to give that impression and promote that assumption.  

However, closer examination shows that the "Fourteenth Amendment" was a by-law amendment added to a very similar document also calling itself "The Constitution of The United States of America" that was issued in 1868 as the Articles of Incorporation for a foreign commercial corporation registered in Scotland.  

That is, the "Fourteenth Amendment" was a By-Law Amendment of a corporation charter.  It had nothing to do with the Constitution issued by our government in 1789. 

As a corporate by-law amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment did not require ratification by the States of the Union, and that is exactly what we observe.  The Fourteenth Amendment, like the Sixteenth, was never ratified by the States of the Union. 

We have thus established --- importantly --- what the Fourteenth Amendment was not and is not.  It is not a ratified amendment to the actual Constitution of the United States of America issued in 1789.  It's a different kind of amendment, a by-law amendment, being applied to a very different kind of "constitution" which was never fully disclosed to nor adopted by the American public, and which was never ratified by our States of the Union. 

The Fourteenth Amendment should have disappeared in 1907, together with its Corporate Constitution, when the underlying corporation went bankrupt.  Instead, the constitution of this defunct commercial corporation and its equally defunct fourteenth by-law amendment continued to be circulated and published and took on a life of its own.  

Amid the endless discussions about what the "Fourteenth Amendment" means and requires, people have forgotten to ask what it fundamentally is --- and that is unfortunate, because a by-law amendment to a corporation charter issued to a defunct and bankrupt corporation means little or nothing at all.  

It's a historical artifact.  The only possible legitimate interest in the Fourteenth Amendment is as an example of large-scale criminal commercial fraud in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. 

So, having determined both what the Fourteenth Amendment is and what it is not, we are prepared to make some additional observations. 

It is not possible to "confer" citizenship obligations on people. 

Municipal "citizenship of the United States" is a contractual obligation that the Fourteenth Amendment purportedly created and arbitrarily conferred on freed plantation slaves, using the argument that these same former slaves were "stateless" and in need of a political status that would allow them to stay in this country. 

Everyone born on the land and soil of an American State is automatically a national of that State regardless of race, creed, or color, regardless of land ownership, economic condition, or age.  

The only American Negroes who could be considered "stateless" were those born in geographical areas outside the borders of any State of the Union -- in the Territories, precisely the areas under the control of the British Territorial U.S. Government and Congress, a responsibility of theirs under the Northwest Ordinance. 

Thus, the Fourteenth Amendment was a corporation by-law amendment reflecting a corporate Public Policy allowing the British Territorial U.S. Government to latch onto American Negroes born in the then-Territories and arbitrarily presume that they were Municipal citizens of the United States.  

Why wouldn't they be considered U.S. Citizens, if the U.S. Congress was so concerned about them being "stateless"? 

U.S. Citizens were "winners" in the illegal mercenary conflict known as "the American Civil War", and they were intent on collecting "war" reparations from the losers in the conflict --- the Municipal citizens of the United States who sided with the Southern Confederacy.   

By presuming that freed black people born in the Territories were citizens of the United States, the U.S. Congress could claim they were "criminals" and therefore "slaves" and attach them as chattel property; instead of being private property, the victims became public property.  Not only that, the citizens of the United States could be taxed to pay war reparations, denied trial by jury, denied habeas corpus protection, and be subjected to a foreign legal system that presumed they were guilty until proven innocent. 

Of course, the men charged with enforcing the Fourteenth Amendment -- then as now -- were mostly ignorant workers, taking directions from experts they trusted to interpret the law and determine which form of law applied to individuals. As a result, the presumptions applied to Negroes born in the Territories were also liberally applied to Negroes born in the States, so that as a practical matter, all people of color were disadvantaged by a foreign citizenship obligation imposed on them without their knowledge or consent.  

The Fourteenth Amendment was a By-Law Amendment adopted by a foreign corporation operating under conditions of deceit and criminal self-interest; although it was never ratified by the States of the Union, and never a part of the actual Constitution of the United States of America (1789), it was and is often confused with and misrepresented as an actual Constitutional Amendment.  

No such honor may be accorded the Fourteenth Amendment, which has instead served to undermine and deny the actual protections owed to all Americans and to obfuscate the nature of the actions undertaken by the U.S. Congress in the wake of the civil war --- actions used to promote unlawful political conversion, aggravated identity theft, and deliberate denigration and impersonation with intent to defraud.

Instead of arguing about what the Fourteenth Amendment means, we need to recognize what it is and isn't. 

It is our implacable position that the Fourteenth Amendment was and is evidence of crimes committed against humanity, and especially against people of color; that this historical evidence of crime has no existing source of power or authority, that it was never a Constitutional Amendment applicable to any actual Federal Constitution, never ratified by the States of the Union, and was instead a By-Law Amendment attached to a deceptively named and presented corporation charter for a British Crown entity dba "United States of America" --- Incorporated. 

We are not deceived. 

We prohibit any continued misapplication of the Fourteenth Amendment on our shores and all similar so-called Amendments, such as the Sixteenth Amendment, which were never ratified by the States of the Union and which do not represent valid Amendments to any actual Federal Constitution issued by the American States. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

January 5th 2026

------------------

See this article and over 5600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: About "the Monroe Doctrine", Etc.

 By Anna Von Reitz

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.  Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.  

As we have noted, we have an venerable service contract known worldwide as "The Constitution of the United States of America" with the British Territorial company/corporation doing business initially as "the United States of America (a Trading Company)" (1789 -1843) and various iterations of "the United States of America, Incorporated" acting as Successors ever since. 

Recently, we have heard that a new version, the "United States of America, LLC" has been drummed up by Trump and his pals at Palantir and Black Rock, et alia, and may be substituting itself as another Successor.  If so, they are again acting under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure.

These entities are British and/or British Territorial commercial corporations. 

 

Donald J. Trump is President of the British commercial corporation undertaking the constitutional service contract.  

 

The British commercial corporation operates under contract in maritime and Admiralty jurisdiction. 

It operates as a "ship made of paper", with Trump as the captain.  

Hence, Mr. Trump holds the Naval Office of "Commander in Chief". 

Are you a British Subject?  Are you at sea? 

USA, Inc. has delegated powers and authority to exercise those powers on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways.  This is the result of old Naval Treaties that recognized the British Monarch as the Trustee of Americans on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways.  

Briefly, note that in the wake of the War of Independence, we were left with a huge commercial fleet and no navy; we needed protection on the High Seas and Navigable Inland waterways, so we hired the British Navy, then the most formidable naval force on Earth, to defend American merchant shipping.  

A special form of United States Flag known as the Title IV Flag which is defined according to specific proportions was set aside for the use of the USA, Inc. when it is exercising our delegated powers on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways or in the Territories and Possessions of the United States.

This British Crown corporation acting as USA, Inc. or Successors thereof, is a mercantile entity and has no actual powers of government on its own and only strictly limited delegated powers as a services vendor, as stipulated by The Constitution of the United States of America. 

The ownership interest in this corporation is privately held and is most likely highly influenced by the Zionist AIPAC lobby, similar to the undisclosed ownership interests involved in fronting the Federal Reserve, Inc. 

The principal role and responsibility of the USA, Inc. is to protect our commercial shipping, and to regulate interstate commerce, so as to promote the free flow of commerce in these designated jurisdictions. 

It also has a responsibility to develop new "United States" Territories under the Northwest Ordinance, and provides a (supposed to be) temporary government for these territories while under development to become full-fledged States of the Union. 

The USA, Inc. and any Successor to Contract also serves as a more-or-less permanent government for the Commonwealth nation of Puerto Rico, and the other "Insular States" considered to be Possessions of the United States, such as Guam, American Samoa, the American Virgin Islands, Mariana Islands, and so on. 

The USA, Inc., and any Successor to Contract, has no delegated authority of its own to declare martial law within any State of the Union nor to otherwise declare war or to set any policy related to our country and people so as to allow or engender any permanent state of war or mercenary conflict or permit occupation by foreign armed forces, including mercenary forces.

The Insurrection Act of 1792 refers to insurrection against our States of the Union and their governments. The Insurrection Act of 1807 extends those provisions to insurrection against the Territorial Government and its territorial "State" franchises, while the Insurrection Act of 1871 extends these protections to the Municipal Government and its STATE franchises.   

These Insurrection Acts do not provide authority to maintain any quasi-military occupation of this country nor do they allow for imaginary rebellions or rebellions against foreign entities, rulerships, or monarchs

None of these Acts provide for action against the sovereign nation-states employing the federal or federal franchise instrumentalities.    

There is no granted contractual authority for the USA, Inc. or its President to create or defend the so-called "Monroe Doctrine" which is a private policy of a foreign commercial corporation acting at its own behest, not associated with the actual government of this country nor with its own duties owed under The Constitution of the United States of America.  

Our service contract clearly stipulates "defense" of our actual country and borders, and self-evidently does not extend to any corporate "policy" such as the Monroe Doctrine which allows chronic, routine extra-territorial meddling and expense related to the defense of other countries or other ill-defined material interests of the USA, Inc. 

Our country has been incorrectly  charged for the expenses that these Federal Service Vendors incurred in two World Wars and countless lesser conflicts that they willfully participated in with no authorization from the American Government to act on our behalf or otherwise serving to rewrite our meaning of "defense". 

The participation of the Federal Service Vendors in all or any of the wars or conflicts against other countries has taken place without any grant of governmental authority from us and without any obvious connection to the actual defense of this country and without any formal declaration of war from our Congress.    

This morning we are being peppered with correspondence asking our position on President Trump's attacks against locations within Venezuela and reports that "Jesuit" agencies are claiming that this action was undertaken in pursuit of the Monroe Doctrine. 

Trump does have reasonable capacity under Article II to act extraterritorially in pursuit of felons -- which has nothing to do with the Monroe Doctrine, and everything to do with police powers under international law.  

We have not seen the evidence that President Trump acted upon, but it is to be expected that this action in Venezuela is a police action, not a political one.  

Accordingly, it cannot legally or lawfully result in any destruction of Venezuela's sovereign nation status, any occupation of Venezuela, or any theft of Venezuelan resources.  

It certainly does not mean that President Trump is now "President" of Venezuela. 

Police actions inhabit a grey area of international law.  

We are not bound to suffer the abuses and activities of criminals simply because they are foreign; they are subject to prosecution, arrest, and in the case of capital crimes, some crimes, like piracy on the High Seas, are punishable by death.  

This is agreed upon, traditional, customary, and a known hazard undertaken by foreign nationals engaged in such activities. 

Any government supporting such criminal activities also assumes a risk for doing so.  Think: Ukraine.

If the puppet regime in Ukraine hadn't hosted and provided safe harbor for every repugnant criminal activity on Earth from money laundering and human trafficking to organ harvesting and biowarfare research, there would have been no Ukrainian war with Russia.  

Russia might have exercised its treaty provisions and acted to protect ethnic Russian populations in Ukraine; it might have taken advantage of other treaty positions to promote a Russian-Crimean government, but there would have been no reason for war.  

International law and diplomacy were sufficient to resolve the treaty concerns.  It was the brazen and accelerating criminality being fostered by Zelensky's government, profiting itself by offering transnational crime syndicates free reign and room and board, that finally prompted Russian action. 

Smuggling dangerous drugs (and precursor chemicals used to make these dangerous drugs) into our country --- drugs that cause an estimated 100,000 deaths per year --- are capital crimes precisely because this contraband causes death on such a scale. 

For years now, President. Maduro has been associated with befriending both home-grown Venezuelan drug syndicates and larger scale regional cartel operations acting within Venezuela.  These unregulated substances wind up on American streets and kill American kids, undermine our workforce, and harm our productivity.

The sale of these illicit drugs nets billions of dollars in dark revenue per year, but the losses to our country extend beyond the monetary costs, impacting lives, employment, and GDP.  For every single person addicted to these drugs, 3.5 more people are adversely impacted, and for every billion dollars wasted on illegal opiates and synthetic drugs, 2.8 billion more gets siphoned out of our economy. 

There's a reason that the Chinese called their fight with Britain over Heroin imports "The Opium War".  

We are facing a similar "war" with the same colonialist powers --- only it's not just Opium or barbiturate drugs anymore; now it is a whole vast range of Cookbook and Designer Drugs, that cost thousands of lives every year, and untold financial and social losses and suffering.

Until we see the evidence that Mr. Trump acted upon, we are withholding judgement concerning the action undertaken against targets inside Venezuela.  

Prevention of civilian deaths, both American and Venezuelan, is the ultimate goal of armed police actions, and without the existence of a clandestine trade in deadly substances, there would be no need for and perhaps more to the point, no excuse for such actions.  

Actions taken to restrain international cross-border trade in dangerous substances should not be mistaken for action under the Monroe Doctrine and should be recognized as international police action, even when those police actions are undertaken by what appear to be military forces. 

Please remember that our military was deceitfully and secretly converted into a private mercenary force during the tenure of Abraham Lincoln and has remained in that status until now, when we are making efforts to one-by-one lawfully convert military personnel back to their natural political status and standing as members of an honorable national military service.  

The Monroe Doctrine has a far more fluid and insidious agenda quite apart from conventional international law enforcement, and while it may appear similar to police action under international law, the Monroe Doctrine is a public policy of an incorporated entity, one designed to promote and assert armed protection of "American" business interests in foreign countries, but actually being extended to British Crown Colonial interests, instead. 

When you say "American" you have to be clear about "which America" you are talking about.  

It is not in the interests of our government to promote any form of colonialism, nor to pay for its evils and upkeep.  

We have never supported colonial enterprises and do not support peonage, enslavement, press-ganging or forced conscription or any of the other unlawful, illegal, and immoral practices that have been employed by the British Crown to subject people and entire countries via a process of aggravated identity theft.

The British Empire did not sincerely forsake its ill-gotten colonial gains and pursuit of colonialist enterprises; it acted in Bad Faith and simply changed jurisdictions and began operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea instead of operating on the land. It went from the Commonwealth form of colonialism to the much more violent and insidious Territorial form of colonialism.  

While outwardly conforming to the conventions outlawing both peonage and slavery brought forward by the League of Nations and passed as international law in 1926, the British Crown sought to evade these obligations by redefining the playing field, and using incorporated franchises as a means to impersonate entire countries and subject them and their people to foreign forms of law that were never meant to be applied to living men and actual countries. 

This gross breach of trust and violation of their service contracts led to investigation by the American Government and their conviction by our Courts of Record in 2014.  

With the admission by the Roman Curia that legal fictions have no standing related to living people and actual countries, and that the law of corporations does not apply to us, the reign of terror inflicted by the British Empire and its Continental European adjuncts, is coming to an end. 

We can all say good-bye to claims and obligations based on "enfranchisement" and  "registration",  and claims against foreign public trusts established "in our names", and all similar misrepresentations and impersonations promoted by the Masters of Deceit.  

We can also say good-bye to the Monroe Doctrine, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Sixteenth Amendment, and all the other arbitrary, unilateral, and unratified pretensions foisted off on us all -- not just Americans.  

People worldwide have suffered from the plague of deceit and lawlessness unleashed by the European monarchies beginning in earnest in the 1860's.  

By these various "legal" but unlawful devices and inaccessible remedies purportedly legalizing institutional criminality, they have continued to practice peonage and enslavement, genocide and illegal conscription, press-ganging, and other crimes against humanity -- on paper; unfortunately, they have then also used their "pretend world" on paper as an excuse to justify enforcement of their fantasies on living men and women and actual resources. 

The result is a world devolved to the level of Dark Age Robber Barons, hiring and misdirecting uniformed thugs to promote and protect their own corporate interests--- and using the public purse to do it, against the Public Interest.  

This form of renegade non-consensual government which we have dubbed "Corporate Feudalism" makes a practice of misrepresenting living people as corporation franchises, and waging "war" against franchises belonging to other corporations.  Although this might seem harmless, considering that these are all legal fiction entities without actual substance, the line between imagination and reality gets blurred and actual people and property interests are harmed.  

We are pleased to announce that the American Government, our government, is back in the saddle. The Law of the Land is being enforced for the first time in over a century and a half.  

Today, we have received word that the U.S. Supreme Court has finally overturned all gun permits nationwide.  They are echoing principles of jurisprudence set down more than two centuries ago, affirming that a right cannot be converted into a privilege and that resulting privilege then be used to produce licensing revenues.  

Two centuries, and the court is finally backing the established jurisprudence on the subject.  Be still our hearts. 

We may assume that the same provisions apply to the right to travel, which has been unlawfully converted into a privilege to drive and obtain private commercial profits from the use of public roads --- and then been licensed and misapplied to millions of Americans who never voluntarily engaged in any form of commerce at all --- much less obtained any profit from commercial activities. 

The courts that have participated in these acts of personage and barratry are now compelled to justify their activities and herein and elsewhere are placed under demand to Cease and Desist enforcement of licenses misapplied to occupations of common right, common activities such as travel for non-commercial purposes, and exercise of common public property rights, such as use of street side and public parking. 

These same corporate administrative tribunals are similarly enjoined from enforcing claims of property tax, federal income tax, franchise tax, gas tax, and utility tax; because of the widespread aggravated identity theft that has occurred and the temptation to secure tax revenues from people who are tax exempt, all commercial and asset claims and public trust interests asserted by members of the International Bar Association and American Bar Association are self-interested, in conflict of interest, suspect and disallowed any benefit of presumed contract based on registrations, enrollments, promissory notes, prior compliance, and similar Third Party, undisclosed, and unstated contracts, identities, and obligations seemingly conferred by legislative action on British Subjects and Municipal citizens of the United States.  

Misapplication of these "laws" and misidentification of Americans as persons subject to these "laws" is at an end. 

Because of the widespread misrepresentation of Americans as British Subjects and resulting "title taking" over their lands and homes and other assets to be included as chattel administered by and held in British Territorial Trusts, most especially, the "Northern Trust",  and Roman Municipal TRUSTS, ;ike the US TRUST, these courts have operated in gross and undisclosed conflict of interest.  

The "ownership" of the bulk of the Fortune 500 Companies has been purloined from American soldiers and sailors and their progeny using the False Presumption that they are British Subjects. 

The "ownership" of most of the land assets of this country has been purloined in the same way.  Our silver, our gold, all our substantive and material assets have been purloined, by the same guilty parties who owe us "good faith service" instead. 

The people responsible of managing the purloined assets for the British Crown are members of the American Bar Association and/or International Bar Association, and they have sat in judgement over the actual American owners using the impersonation of these Americans as British Subjects as a device to coerce, control, and impose non-consensual debt obligations.

All this has been accomplished under color of law and all without telling the Americans one word about any of this "convenient accommodation" and "special relationship".  

They have acted in gross, inexcusable, criminal self-interest and in conflict of interest. They have robbed their friends and neighbors.  They have betrayed the most basic precepts of justice, human decency, and contractual obligation.  They have made "war" against their employers and conscripted and press-ganged their employer's sons and daughters and used them as cheap mercenaries under pretense of honorable military service.  

These False Friends and Disloyal Allies have grossly misrepresented this country and its people, and deliberately hid their own identities and roles so as to unjustly enrich themselves and their "Prince" or should we say, "Arch-Treasurer"? 

The Monroe Doctrine may be the doctrine of their foreign British Crown corporation and part of its public policies as well; none of that has anything to do with America or Americans; none of it is suggested by The Constitution of the United States of America nor by any other treaty or contractual service agreement we have with them. 

We do not accept any cost associated with their application of their Monroe Doctrine; we have no such doctrine amounting to a license to engage in eternal meddling and coercion and mercenary "war".  This doctrinal license to bully is not what America stands for, not what America contractually agreed to, and we can safely say, not anything that America wishes to be associated with.  

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

January 5th 2026

------------------

See this article and over 5600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.