By Anna Von Reitz
Those who have deeply studied the history of the American Revolution will remember a central character in the debate over American Independence, a very wealthy Pennsylvanian Tory named John Dickenson, who argued passionately against American independence throughout his tenure as a member of the Pennsylvania Delegation attending the Second Continental Congress.
Dickenson felt that things could not possibly be bad enough in terms of overall conditions in the Colonies to justify separation from England; he abhorred the bloodshed and destruction of property and cancellation of normal business routines that would attend a war.
Like many Americans at the time, Dickenson valued the cultural roots we share with the British, the common language, and to some extent, our shared history; by any standard of the day, he was a confirmed Tory, short for "British Territorial Citizen".
Yet, John Dickenson was an honorable man, and once the Congress had decided the issue of American Independence --- and while not hiding his disappointment --- Dickenson resigned his position as a Pennsylvania Delegate and joined the Continental Army and fought in America's defense.
Today, he is most remembered as the president of Delaware (1781-83) and the president of Pennsylvania (1782-1785).
These were commercial company offices entrusted with conducting the day to day business of Delaware and Pennsylvania, both positions that Dickenson excelled in. From the time that the States of America Confederation was ratified in 1781, Dickenson's acumen in business affairs was both trusted and recognized by Tories and Patriots alike.
It was Dickenson who argued most convincingly that the choice of political loyalty, like any freedom of conscience--- and like the more celebrated issue of freedom of religion--- must ultimately be a matter of free will choice.
When the issue of confiscating Tory land and business holdings in America came to the fore in the years immediately following the end of the armed hostilities, it was Dickenson who argued persuasively -- and successfully -- in favor of letting Tories retain their business interests in America and their allegiance to the British King, too, so long as they honored the peace.
As Dickenson often reiterated, and personally demonstrated, a man need not be of the same religion, nor hold the same views about government, to be a good neighbor and obey the law.
The idea that nobody should be torn from their cultural and political affinities against their will -- and the absolute right to expatriate from changes in government -- which is enshrined throughout modern jurisprudence, was championed by Dickenson throughout his public life, even to the point of becoming a namesake for the "Dickensonians" who continued his legacy of championing individual political free will for a hundred years after his death.
Like many other influences that are not household names today, but which nonetheless had profound influence in the past and which continue to have effect today, Dickenson and his followers are the root reason that we are obliged to consciously choose our political status and place it on the public record today.
Upon hearing that this is necessary and that they have otherwise been "registered" as British Subjects without their knowledge and consent, many Americans are outraged. They consider it preposterous that anyone could "mistake" them for a Brit -- much less tax them as a Brit or take title to their land as a Brit -- and yet, it is self-evident that from the Revolutionary War onward, Tories who maintain allegiance to the British Monarch and the British Crown have lived among us.
One notable expression of this "separate nation" is provided by the Residence Act of 1790 that served to set aside the District of Columbia and provided for a separate Federal Capitol, Washington, DC, within the District.
While our American National Capitol remained in Philadelphia, their Federal "National" Capitol moved to the District of Columbia in December of 1800.
The British Territorial U.S. Citizens were not the only citizenry occupying this new Federal Capitol and District. They initially shared it with Americans who immigrated to the District of Columbia and adopted the political status of United States Citizens while working for the American Federal Republic (1787-1861). A third population of "citizens of the United States" who were largely Federal Civil Service workers, shared the same turf.
You can also see this at work in Puerto Rico; while generally considered part of the United States Territories and Possessions, Puerto Rico is and continues to be a British Commonwealth nation.
Many nations can co-exist and inhabit the same piece of land and soil, whether that land and soil is delineated by the borders of a sovereign state, a district, a municipality (city-state), a province or a principality, a territory, kingdom, or commonwealth.
Thus, largely as a result of John Dickenson's enduring opinion that a man's political conscience must be as free as his religious conscience, we have always had British Territorial U.S. Citizens living with us cheek and jowl, as well as "citizens of the United States" -- Federal citizens working for the Holy Roman Empire (and Successors) as members of the Federal Civil Service.
Coming to grips with this, and also realizing that from 1787-1861 there was also a brand of American Federal Citizen, too, working for the American Federal Republic as a United States Citizen (See the first Immigration and Naturalization Act), it is apparent that, yes, it's entirely possible that you could be a British Subject, but be born on the land and soil of this country.
As an American born on the land and soil of one of the States of the Union, you have a birthright --- not as a "citizen" but as a national. It's up to you, whether you claim that birthright or accept one of the foreign citizenships that are also available.
Unfortunately, as the years have gone by and the British Territorial U.S. Government has dominated everything, a program purportedly meant to register babies born to U.S. Citizens as British Subjects has been used to willy-nilly register everyone in sight, without any explanation or disclosure. As a result, millions of Americans have been "accidentally-on-purpose" misidentified as British Subjects and as U.S. Citizens, without their knowledge or conscious consent.
These unconscionable citizenship contracts and "birth registrations" have been used to evade the guarantees owed to these same Americans under the terms of The Constitution of the United States of America and construed so that these same Americans and their birthright estates are considered to be chattel property backing the debts of the British Crown Corporation.
Now, many people have asked me as Fiduciary, why it should be necessary for us, Americans, to one-by-one reclaim and revest our birthright estates and identity as Americans?
Why can't we just look at this situation and wave a magic "Fraud Wand" over the whole mess and declare all presumptions of foreign political status null and void?
Answer: (1) The process undertaken to entrap each American baby happened on a one-by-one basis, and to undo it requires a one-by-one process in answer. By Maxim of Law, as a thing is bound, so it is unbound. Thus, we are obliged to declare our birthright standing as American State Nationals, not British Subjects, and publish our will on a one-by-one basis. (2) Some people born in this country actually are British Subjects and they wish to remain so. For them, birth registration is required by their statutory law and their citizenship obligations begin at birth. Any attempt to invoke a generalized action addressing the systemic fraud against Americans would result in denying the British Tories their right to engage in life as British Subjects and U.S. Citizens--- the same freedom to choose political loyalties that John Dickenson compared to freedom of religion.
So that is why we, Americans, can't just wave our hands and do a little song and dance for our friends and say, "Of course, I'm an American!" in an offended tone of voice, implying --- what Luddite thinks otherwise?
No doubt, the same people who hold a contract saying that you are a British Territorial Subject, signed by your own Mother and a Medical Doctor, whose signature counts as two separate witnesses.
That makes three Witnesses standing against your single denial, and bear in mind that the Witness of a Medical Doctor outranks all but the highest officers of the British Territorial courts.
Also bear in mind that because you were a baby at the time that your Mother unknowingly signed you up as a Brit, you have no credible firsthand knowledge and can't testify on your own behalf.
Who's the Luddite now?
Add the fact that by the time anyone tells you what is going on, or you figure it out on your own, your Mom has probably passed on and half the people who could testify about your birth and family and natural status as an American, are dead, too.
Things are a bit easier now, as the situation has become known and people including doctors and lawyers and judges worldwide are catching the drift of the Scheme, and as more and more astonished Americans are weighing in and saying -- "I'm not British! And I'm not a Roman municipal citizen, either!"
We, Americans, have had no cause to deny or rebut either one of these claims, because we were deliberately kept in the dark and the Perpetrators remained silent, motivated by the thought that they could "latch onto" us and to our physical assets, subject us to their own foreign courts, and take everything we have including our Good Names and identities, without firing a shot.
The thieves who created and worked this multi-generational impersonation scheme against us have been found out; the war-mongering murderers who lied to us and used our sons and daughters as cheap mercenaries have been discovered; those who illegally occupied our country and who "borrowed" our money and credit under False Pretenses are now known.
This game of Wizard's Chess is at an end. Their cover is blown.
The nature and extent and history of their "Lawfare" against the living people, and their use of non-conventional atypical warfare against us --- Medical Doctors and Registered Nurses --- mostly unaware of what they were doing, but used as "civilian military Uniformed Officers" to inject deadly "shots" into our arms, is known.
Their selfishness, depravity, criminality, greed, dishonor, cowardice, immorality and deceitfulness is exposed for all the world to see, along with the "fruits" of their existence --- human trafficking, drug smuggling, war for profit, pollution, social psychosis, corporate feudalism, peonage, slavery, racism, asset theft under color of law, and so much more that is destructive, unjust, and despicable.
There is no Magic Wand to wipe away their fraud and impersonation scheme, only the individual will to rise up, claim back one's true identity, and put an end to their lies to us and about us.
The same scheme that they applied to Americans has been foisted off on dozens of other countries, too. The home islands of Britain, the former Commonwealth, seventeen Allied occupied countries in western Europe, Japan, the Philippines, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and many more including The United States, and Ukraine, have all fallen victim to the same criminals.
Notice to Principals is notice to Agents; notice to Agents is notice to Principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
December 9th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
