Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.


Thursday, July 17, 2025

Clear Reason Why You Need to Get Involved

 By Anna Von Reitz

For sixteen (16) years, the State of California DOT has been working, purportedly, on a plan for a high speed rail line. 

They've spent $15 Billion dollars and have nothing to show for it after 16 years.  No train, no track, no nothing.  Fifteen Billion gone. 

Now, if you think that this is just "government money" and none of your concern, you would be right in a sane world, but this is not a sane world.  

This particular "government" is a foreign governmental services corporation, and every time it goes bankrupt (increasingly often) its debts get thrown off on you and your children.  

So, yes, Poco, their reckless spending and siphoning and embezzling is a concern for you and yours. 


While the Federation is busy bringing this and other practices before the appropriate international courts to rip the so-called "corporate veil" off the criminals responsible, you have to do your part to: (1) support our actions and (2) weigh in at the State and local levels to put an end to it.  

The Trump Administration saved Californians from wasting another $4 Billion on this endless Pork Barrel project, one of dozens administered every year by California DOT--- but the missing element is you, the people of California in this case, though it could just as well be the people of New York or Massachusetts or.... 

You now have a voice and you need to make use of it --- go to: 


Don't worry about our actual government "not maintaining a secure connection to https".  That's the least of the problem that needs to be addressed. 

If you don't agree to be saddled with the reckless spending and waste and the unaccountable and unauthorized acts of foreign "government services corporations" rampaging around and spending your credit and indebting you in boondoggles like this, it is past time to take action. 

Positive, lawful action, that you -- as Americans -- have every right to take. 

Granna

International Public Notice: Lessons of Law and History

 By Anna Von Reitz

As we have explained many times, the words "common law"  refer to a form of law that takes reference to earlier decisions in making current decisions. There are, as a result, many, many forms of "common law" and this can be confusing when a judge is referring to "military common law" as "common law" or a magistrate is referring to "civil code" as "common law".    Both these forms of law, which most of us DO NOT THINK OF as "Common Law", are in fact common law in that they take cognizance of former decisions made by other courts in considering current matters before the court. 

When talking about "Common Law" we always have to ask "Common Law in what sense?  What variety of "Common Law" are we talking about?" 

Common Law doesn't "come from the Magna Carta" --- a misunderstanding that comes from another misunderstanding about what the Magna Carta is, where it came from, and what it set in place in England. 

William the Conqueror means to conquer England permanently --- and he went about this in a very methodical manner.  First, he did a very methodical survey of the lands and assets he had conquered.  This inventory was recorded in two books, the Doomsday Book and the Domesday Book, which still exist. 

Upon his death in 1087 A.D., he bequeathed specific parcels of land and homesteads to his loyal Norman Barons who participated in the military conquest.  Along with the land grants and improvements, he granted his Barons (who remained only Barons in France) "sovereignty in their own right" on these English properties. These bequests are essentially miniature kingdoms scattered like a crazy quilt over every square inch of England at that time. 

And the Barons of France became Kings in England.  

The other thing that William the Conqueror purposefully did was to disinherit all his children from owning anything in England.  Forever. 

He didn't want there to ever be a singular King of England again, so that England would never again rear its ugly head against France.  

Now, how is it that there appears to be a King of England today and for generations in the past despite William's plan?  

The Pope had lands in England that had been ceded to the Church by various Kings prior to "the Norman Settlement" and William of Normandy allowed the Church to retain all its Church properties in England.   After the Settlement of William the Conqueror's Will as described above, the Pope came back into the picture and cut a deal with William the Conqueror's Grandson, "King" John to act as the Overseer of the Church's Commonwealth properties in England.    

Thus, "King" John was a "King" of the Vatican, not of England.  His "kingdom" was borrowed from the Pope and not actually his at all, thus he was not operating in any true sovereign capacity, but was instead operating as a Legal Person in an Office granted to him by the Pope.  

The Norman Barons who had become Kings in England, of course, were unaffected by this and did not regard "King John" as their king at all.  

Thus, when poor administrative decisions made by John adversely impacted people living on Church Commonwealth land and this led to uprisings and complaints, the French Barons who had become Kings in England got together and set forth and signed off on the Magna Carta, clearly establishing standards of justice and law and basic rights for people throughout England --- for everyone living outside the Pope's enclaves.  

Thus, the "Great Product" of England, turns out to be the Great Product of France, instead.  

The Normans brought their own standards of justice to England and set them forth in the Magna Carta and they imposed these standards throughout the lands they inherited from William the Conqueror --- and they could do this as a group in opposition to anything "King" John might decree as the "law" on the Pope's Commonwealth land for the simple reason that they were all already kings in their own right.  

The principles they jointly set forth to establish "a" Common Law for England --- essentially, as the Landlords of a foreign land they inherited by conquest and primogeniture --  already existed long before the Magna Carta, and were common to the Celtic peoples of Continental Europe.  

What they held to be "Common Law" meant "law held to be right and just in common" --- in the same way that we use the words "common sense" to indicate commonly held standards of practicality and logic.  This venerable form of law comes to us from clan traditions that are thousands of years old, in which elders meet on a regular basis to sort through current complaints and controversies in light of traditional wisdom: principles of justice held in common, and former decisions rendered over time. 

For example, we all have a sense of what is fair and what is not fair, and this is not necessarily something that can be codified and fully described in a statute, yet in the "commonality" of Common Law and within the logic circuits we are all heir to, we know when something passes the Sniff Test --- or not.  

Thus, the new Kings of England declared that people are to be considered innocent until proven guilty --- a Common Law principle that is at exact odds with Roman Civil Law which decrees that everyone is guilty until proven innocent.  

Thus, though both English Common Law and Roman Civil Law take reference to past case law, and so can both be considered a form of Common Law, the principles and presumptions of the Common Law established by The Magna Carta are very substantially different from those of Roman Civil Law in this regard and many others.  

Another example is that Roman Civil Law allows purposeful deceit under the Maxim of Law "Let him who will be deceived, be deceived." -- while The Magna Carta and all forms of traditional community-based Common Law outlaw fraud and lies of all kinds without any wiggle-room. 

The punishment for fraud under Roman Civil Law is very strict as the Roman Civil Law derives from the even older Law Merchant, designed to settle disputes among merchants and vendors and customers of the same--- and not meant to apply to the general affairs of men apart from buying and selling.  A finding of fraud under Roman Civil Law requires immediate dissolution of everything back to the onset of the fraud, but a similar finding under European Common Law might allow for considerations such as the limited knowledge of a vendor, or the honest intentions of a buyer impeded by "Acts of God". 

Important to this is the difference between being "outlawed" and being "unlawful" and being "illegal".  

Cattle Rustlers in the Old West were called "Outlaws" for a reason --- they were men operating outside the common decency and sensible restrictions of the Common Law requiring respect for private property rights.  Community-based Common Law dictates the relations between living men and communities of living men.  This form of Common Law, which the Romans called "the Rule of the Soil", is what most Americans think of when someone says "common law" ---without realizing that this form of common law can vary widely.  

A crime like Cattle Rustling fully recognized as a capital crime in Wyoming, might not even exist on the books in New York.  Thus, community based Common Law is firmly rooted in place and time and specific communities of living people.  This is the form of law that exists in American Counties and which is reflected in the State Law of our nation-states.  

We don't call Cattle Rustlers "Unlawfuls" because unlawful acts are the actions of Lawful Persons just as illegal acts can only be committed by Legal Persons --- these words refer to offenses taking place in international jurisdictions of the law where everyone is presumed to be acting -- not as living men -- but as Lawful or Legal Persons. 

As I keep telling everyone, there are no living people operating under international law or any form of global law.    The only "actors" in these jurisdictions are "persons" --- corporate entities, officers or officials of corporate entities, or incorporated entities and their principal and franchise officers and officials.  When we enter these jurisdictions we are literally entering the "realm of the dead" --- lawful or legal fictions.  

Lawful Persons are subject to the Law of the Land and Legal Persons are subject to the Law of the Sea or Law of the Air. 

Thus, when a sailor arrives in port after a long sea voyage, he is returning from being subject to the Law of the Sea, and is becoming subject to the Law of the Land when he steps off the deck onto the dock and off the dock onto the land proper.  

The ship functions under Admiralty Law, the dock functions under Maritime Law, and the actual land functions under Land Law.  Thus, the Federal Constitutions are described as "the Law of the Land" for Federal Workers, their dependents, and residents of this country allowed to be here under the Residency Act. 

This means that the Constitutions are the Law these Persons are meant to observe while on the land. 

Though you may never have thought about it this way, the Constitutions exist in the realm of international land law, cast in the form of a service contract with service vendors that are all operating in foreign jurisdiction..  

Read that: all Federal Persons, whether they were born in this country or not, are operating in a foreign capacity on the job.  They won't officially return "home" again, until their service contract ends and they serve notice that they are returning to their birthright status. 

Thus, the Constitutions are international law and those serving under the Federal Constitutions are serving under the law of contracts -- that is, their Service Contract. 

None of this has anything to do with the community-based Common Law of the soil which our Courts administer at the County level, nor with the National State Laws or International Public Laws our State Courts address. 

The system of law we are heir to is complex and precise, each part checked and balanced for the overall good.  As living people we use the Public Law for our private good.  As Lawful and Legal Persons we use the private law (codes, statutes, regulations, treaties and contracts) for our Public Good.  

This complexity and the rooted nature of both land and soil law, which intensifies and yet strictly limits their application, accounts for such seeming mysteries as why doesn't the Credit River Decision established by Jerome Daley in 1968 apply nationwide?   At least in Minnesota where the landmark case was tried?  The case was tried in a County Court, so has application only within the borders of that county.  

Unlike the law of the sea, the law of land and soil is fixed and applies only within specific boundaries.  

As a result of England losing its way and answering to a King who was a "King" under contract to the Pope, and then later getting more enmeshed  when the British Monarch lost standing on the sea (1714), this complex and intricate system of laws and jurisdictions began to be eroded; a new form of law called "equity law" which largely combined the law of the land with the law of the sea for the convenience of bill collectors was contrived by Lord Mansfield in the 1750's and popularized throughout the British-influenced domains.  

This form of law was considered a bastardization of law in this country and never adopted for use in any of our courts, yet it has usurped power and claimed jurisdiction by "redefining" Americans as British Territorial and/or Roman Municipal citizens --- absent our consensual agreement or even knowledge. 

Regardless of England's deplorable condition, brought about by three centuries of reckless spending and even more reckless war-profiteering, we are set upon the course of restoring our traditional government and setting the living people above the things that living people have created -- that is, mere legal fictions that have no natural right to exist. 

This is part of our observance of Natural and Universal Law: the Creator is always greater than the thing created, and any inverted system of law denying this is by nature fraudulent, null and void.  

Our law of land and soil is substantive and applies naturally to substantive property and rights.  We are people of substance, and live in a realm of substance.  Our community-based version of Common Law has existed since mankind's journey first began and was invoked again in the Mayflower Compact, where living men agreed to the law they would follow and set their hands and signatures to their principles and agreements, as a Witness to their common values and aims.

Let these lessons outlined here serve everyone as guidance going forward, so that as complex as issues of jurisdiction and law may be, we are never deceived about the nature of man or of reality again, and never again are deceived into subjecting ourselves to laws meant to govern things. 

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

July 16th 2025

------------------
See this article and over 5400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Silver Price Prediction: The Cup and Handle Pattern Pointing to Triple Digits

 https://youtu.be/O9nWtFRd9Jc


Silver could be on the verge of a breakout. In the latest episode of The Gold & Silver Show, Mike Maloney and Alan Hibbard explore a rare technical pattern flashing across multiple timeframes.

The setup? A multi-year “cup and handle” formation already breaking out on 6-month, quarterly, and annual charts. Mike believes this pattern could push silver beyond $150—possibly to $300, $400, or even $500+ per ounce.

That might sound far-fetched, but historical parallels suggest it’s not only possible — it’s happened before.

----------------------------------

By Paul Stramer

In 2024 we started using the new mint in Indiana to stamp and ship our silver rounds, after over 18 years with the previous mint in Utah. 

After receiving the first three orders and finding the quality to be even better than the product from the old mint we started taking orders for these new Divisible one ounce silver .999 fine rounds.

The new and much larger minting company has multiple facilities around the country including in Indiana, California and Nevada.

I now have a good working relationship with the new company and am making even more announcements about the improved way we are doing this business. Here are some of the things that are changing for the better for you, our customers.

1. The old 500 ounce minimum order is gone. The new minimum order is now 60 ounces

2. They will be very competitive in their price structure, and right now we are offering a price plan based on the volume of metal in each order. See below.

3. The shipping will be faster, and the wait time will be less than it was. Each order will be shipped with full insurance. I made my first 3 orders and all those orders arrived here for local customers and our stock. The total time from order to arrival was just 12 days for those orders. Since then we have had several large orders go out and be delivered within 2 weeks.

These will be shipped from Indiana or Nevada depending on where the order is going, by UPS Ground, fully insured.

 We will still be accepting wire transfers, or cashiers checks like always. 

We can only lock an order after we have received the funds. Here is the formula we use to figure your price.

Go to this link on Kitco.com and look up the ask price of silver. https://www.kitco.com/price/precious-metals

It's in the first table on that page. 



For a 60 oz. to 99 oz. order, take the ask price and add $3.95

For a 100 oz. to 199 oz. order, take the ask price and add $3.75. 

For a 200 oz. to 299 oz. order, take the ask price and add $3.50. 

For a 300 oz. to 999 oz. order, take the ask price and add $3.25. 

All orders over 1000 ounces will be $3.00 over spot ask price.

Take that number times the number of ounces (60 or over) and then add $25.00 for each 60 to 100 ounce box for shipping, or for large orders add $40 per 500 ounce box for shipping.

Once we have your funds we will run this same formula to finalize the price with shipping.

Be sure to call us when you are ready to order so we can answer your questions.

When you call I will get your email address and send you the bank info for wire transfers or the mailing info for your payment. You can then reply with your shipping address for UPS.

If you have any questions here is my contact info.

Office phone  406 889 3183  8 AM to 2 PM and 4PM to 6 PM weekdays.

Cell  406 253 4257  when I am not in the office. Try the Office line first.

pstramer@gmail.com   or  pstramer@eurekadsl.net

Thanks for your support over the years.  We are now open and taking orders.

Paul Stramer   S.A.G.

Monday, July 14, 2025

International Public Notice: Digital Currencies Are Not "Safe"

 By Anna Von Reitz

People are desperately looking for something, anything, to replace the Federal Reserve Note.  Trying to sustain and even increase the velocity of money, they have turned to digital currency --- a plethora of various tokens and coins traded via a digital system and digital "wallets" -- and all containing what?  

Really?  

No, of course, digital currencies aren't safe investments.  We don't claim or guarantee that they are.  They may be necessary for a time, but buyers need to beware and to the extent that they feel they have to invest in currency outside the conventional system, limit their investments. 

Why?  

Because digital currencies are not safe and can never be as safe as gold or silver in hand, or even cash in hand.  

Cash, at least, is evidence of credit or debt.  

With a digital currency, all it takes is a well-placed EMP or drone strike that short-circuits the global electrical grid -- and believe it or not, even the most carefully constructed blockchain system can be defeated.  

The Perpetrators want to get rid of cash because the form of cash they have been using is evidence of crime -- their crime.  They have passed off non-negotiable instruments as a currency, they have presented I.O.U.s issued by commercial and/or municipal corporations as currency issued by a legitimate government. They have repeatedly defaulted and sought bankruptcy protection paid for by their victims. 

And every Federal Reserve Note on Earth tells the tale against them. 

No wonder they are desperate to escape into the digital realm, where all the digits merely entered into a computer can "stand for" whatever they claim to keep an accounting of, but as it turns out, they are lousy accountants, too.  

They are the ones who adopted Easy Eddie O'Hare's "double accrual bookkeeping system" --- otherwise known as keeping two sets of books, one for budgeted and one for non-budgeted income -- not us. 

They are the ones that didn't balance the books for over 160 years, leading to a situation where one side of the ledger overflowed with debt and the other side overflowed with credit --- and the poor people stuck in between were charged "interest" on a debt that never actually existed, while the Perps feasted on their credit. 

They are desperate to escape to a digital system that will be "more elastic" and easier to manipulate.  

And faster.  

They keep emphasizing that digital will be faster.  

But that doesn't matter, really.  We already have technology that is infinitely faster than human inputs can match.  So it is all just BS. 
Most of it is being brought to us by the Deep State Chinese Government, which, coincidentally, isn't Communist.  It's Capitalist in the extreme, and it has already taken over most of the major port facilities on this planet. 

Get a clue. These corporations aren't really Chinese. 

They are British Crown and "American" Corporations operating in China.  China was just the new forward base for these parasites. 

We may all have to rely on a digital system in the short term, but nothing is more firmly etched in our minds, than the necessity to have real, actual, in-our-hand cash and money --- and not rely upon digital digits entered into digital ledgers. 

If you hear anyone parroting the idea that digital currencies are safe, feel free to disabuse them of their ignorance.  They aren't safe, though they may be necessary for a time.  

And none of us can afford to leave the administration of any digitized financial system in the hands of the same Perpetrators who have engineered the present debacle. 

At all times, remember who and what we are dealing with. 

They aren't trustworthy and nothing they produce is trustworthy as a result.  We have the evidence and the road rash to prove this. 
Those who don't learn from the past have cause to regret it in the future.  

Those who couldn't manage a paper currency and do an honest job of it don't deserve a second chance managing an even more fluid and ephemeral digital currency.  

So, no, digital currencies are not safe.  We may have to use digital exchanges in the short term, but the need for "hard copy" will not disappear for obvious reasons.  

Meantime, choose and use digital products carefully and with full knowledge that they can just disappear --- literally in the blink of an eye.  Do not place all your eggs in their basket.  

This is a matter of common sense and due diligence.  Nobody should need to be told that digital currencies are risky.  The need to use them as a means of exchange may be necessary in the short term, but never fall into any false sense of security concerning them.

Observe-- blockchains, so long as electrical connection is maintained, can track the transit of transactions through a grid system.  They don't guarantee the nature, value, or existence of the "value" being tracked. 

So keep your Shinola Sensors on "High" and be sensible about any investments you make in any digital currency. 
 

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

July 14th 2025

------------------
See this article and over 5400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: The Rothschild Run Around

 By Anna Von Reitz

For over 160 years the books haven't been balanced.  Gross debt has been allowed to accumulate on one side, so that the Perpetrators could claim interest, while gross credit has been allowed to accumulate on the other side of the ledger, so that the Perpetrators would have plenty of Slush funding to spend on payola and investments helpful to themselves and their cronies.  

This has gone on because the US Trustees were either ignorant or complicit, and nobody has demanded that the accounts be balanced and the bogus interest payments removed. 

We are demanding that now.  

We are also suing for the return of all our purloined gold, silver, and land assets, cash assets, and intellectual property assets -- our Good Names, our trademarks, our corporations, and our "performance" pay and the return of taxes that we didn't owe and should never have paid.  

It's been damned convenient for the British Crown to have access to our credit and never have to pay jack-diddly for it, and the Bank of England and the Bank of Scotland have sat mum as two cats in a creamery, too busy licking up the profits to do any "messy" due diligence owed to the Americans. 

It's owed just the same. 

The Plan launched in 1910 was to steal our assets and plunder our resources and front a debt-based currency -- the Federal Reserve Note, which would be a fiat currency based on nothing more than hot air.  

The only thing backing this currency made of non-negotiable I.O.U.s would be public ignorance and all the goods and services the dullard Americans would provide upon demand in response to being told that these I.O.U.s were "legal tender". 

This currency, like all such fiat currencies, was born a-dying.  Just as Jefferson warned, first by inflation and then by deflation, the supposed value of the Federal Reserve Note has been worn down until it is really worth nothing at all. 

This has been confirmed by numerous court cases in which the plaintiffs have been informed that Federal Reserve Notes have no value.  People can steal them at will and not be held accountable as a result.  

They are Monopoly money, yet nobody got the Rothschild Joke. 

They issued a quasi-military scrip and claimed that this entire country was a military occupied zone, to get away with using it "as" legal tender.  The Plan launched on Jekyll Island was, and is, the ultimate Something for Nothing Scam. 

The Plotters seized upon our gold first, and then, in 1934, came for our silver.  Always the same ploy: exchange paper and promises to pay in the future for actual gold, silver, land, or whatever else of tangible, substantive value.  Do this under color of law, by pretending to be their government. 

Fool the Marks.  Use their own assets and credit against them.  

So that's what they did, always planning to -- at the end of the day -- collapse the sideshow, outlaw the Federal Reserve Note scam that they created --- blame it on whoever happens to remain standing after the music stops --- and pull the plug when the price of gold goes up enough to guarantee abundant profits to the member banks of the banking cartels supporting this.  

If approximately 12X the base as profit, plus the seigniorage, plus all the material wealth and labor performances they have stolen in the meantime, plus all the natural resources purloined, plus all the interest on the "loans" made to us using our own assets and credit,  and all the free payola and all the free investment "money" they obtained and all the other countries they have plundered as part of their war-for-profit schemes are sufficient, they all ought to be fat as ticks ready to explode. 

Just in time for the rest of us to pull the plug on them. 

The essence of the fraud is Gross of Breach of Trust, and criminal violation of Service Contracts; but, given over 160 years to embroider their "Plan", it has expanded exponentially to the takeover of other lawful governments and their "administration" as de facto colonies run by commercial corporations pretending to be legitimate governments. 

This is crime, pure and simple, and it has been foisted off on us by people on our payroll.  

They have lied to us and grossly abused their positions of trust, and lied to the rest of the world, too.  According to them, the American Government -- in sum total -- disappeared, assumed to be in interregnum, "missing", whereabouts unknown.... 

All that actually disappeared -- so far as the Federal System is concerned -- was our American Federal Subcontractor, popularly known as the Federal Republic, doing business as "the United States".  

Which is what the Perpetrators of these crimes, the British Territorial U.S. Congress, claimed was "abandoned" --- and which they claimed to own without disclosure and public notice outside the District of Columbia, on February 2nd 1871.  

They have used the skeleton of our Federal Republic as a storefront ever since, literally pretending to be us, and to legitimately have and exercise the authorities we entrusted to our American Subcontractors via The Constitution for the united States of America (1787). 

The upshot is that nobody who has been exercising the powers of the original Federal Constitution (since 1861) was authorized to do so, and the Principals holding the American side of the constitutional contracts were not told a word about any of this.  

This entire mess is the equivalent of an old British Naval ploy -- to use captured ships to misrepresent and hide their own identity as the attackers, only in this case, the Brits owed us good faith service, under contract, instead. 

The further upshot is that our States and our Federation of States are the only lawful and empowered entities left standing that are the inheritors of the United States property and we fully claim that we have been defrauded and that we have been deliberately misidentified as "US Citizens" of some stripe and registered as such in a deliberate effort to impersonate us and deny our standing. 

This has been done deliberately and with malice aforethought by our foreign federal Subcontractors acting in Breach of Trust and in Violation of their service contracts  -- all in an effort to defraud and denigrate us, the very people that they owe their "good faith service" to. 

The gold prices have failed to meet the Rothschild's goal of "a thousand times" the gold price in 1928, but it has risen to over a hundred times what they paid for it in 1928.  

Basically, they purloined the gold in exchange for paper promises, "bought" gold with this paper at $28 per ounce, and are poor-mouthing that gold prices are "too low" at $3300 per ounce. On top of all the rest of the profit they have embezzled and all the debt they have heaped on us in the meantime.  

Please note, they "exchanged" nothing but paper promises for our gold and silver, and did so under color of law, and under contract to provide "good faith service".  These banks and bankers have never had anything on the table, nothing at risk at all. 

They have grossly misrepresented and defrauded their Employers, and have misrepresented the so-called "American Civil War" as a war owed the Law of War, when in fact it was a mercenary conflict that they deliberately engendered on our shores --- again, in breach of trust and contract. 

We are calling upon the world military authorities and uniform commercial courts and the international criminal court to address this situation and put an end to the Rothschild Run Around, in which they use the assets and credit of their Employers to grossly enrich themselves, and leave the actual owners penniless and purportedly in debt, simply by manipulating appearances and falsifying records. 

We do not mean to imply that the Rothschild Banks are uniquely responsible for this circumstance, merely that this is what Rothschild Banks are famous for --- a methodology that they pioneered and which they and other banking interests have used with devastating effects on the world economy.  

If this is a "war" in any sense, it needs to be a war on crime and against those criminals who have consistently resorted to crime and fraud and subterfuge to undermine the interests of their own employers and the Public-at-Large.  

We claim the entire profit these cretins have extracted for the benefit and support of the living people they have harmed, plus treble damages for the breach of trust, plus the balancing of the books retroactively and the removal of the false presumption of debt resulting from their failure to balance the books and the removal and restitution of all interest paid on this manufactured debt. 

We claim the intellectual and material property interests they have purloined and abused.  Our patents, our trademarks, our good names and our performances are owed to us.   

We claim the Slush and Pension funds, both "internally" and "externally" managed.  

We claim the ownership and right to liquidate these banks -- meaning all the central banks and the Bank for International Settlements, which has obviously failed, and we claim all the offending governmental services corporations and we retain the right to lawfully convert them at our discretion. 

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS; NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; notice to principals is notice to agents; notice to agents is notice to principals. 

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

July 14th 2025

------------------
See this article and over 5400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.