Response from Karen Hudes to Judge Anna Von Reitz

Today, I received a polite and direct response from Karen Hudes, for which I thank her.  It may indeed open up a worthwhile dialogue. 

Here is her query: 

Dear Ms. Von Reitz,

Ferdinand Marcos and Jose Rizal, who established the World Bank and IMF to manage the world's international monetary gold reserves at the end of WWII, distrusted judges.  Instead, they established a cooperative of all the nations, headed by their ministers of finance, to manage the world's wealth in the Global Debt Facility on behalf of humanity.    The courts have no jurisdiction over the assets in the Global Debt Facility.  That was how the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF were able to nullify the attempt of the International Court of Justice and CIA to steal the assets in the Global Debt Facility.  https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter7.18.15.1.pdf

Did you even know about the National Advisory Council on International Monetary and Economic Policies, where the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of State, and other economic agencies of the US regulate the World Bank?  So your advice for the Secretary of State, Secretary of Treasury and President to sue the World Bank was all muddled.  

When you accused the County Executives of America of being in receipt of the US monetary gold reserves in the Global Debt Facility, did you have this press release, cleared by the County Executives of America on behalf of the American people, in mind?  https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter7.25.14.pdf  You object to the international monetary gold reserves of the American people being incorporated into their currency, so that they do not have to pay interest on country debt through income taxes?  Why is that?  When US Presidents tried to do exactly that, they were assassinated (Lincoln and JFK) or shot (Ronald Reagan)

What is happening is that the American people are restoring their Constitutional government under Article V of the Constitution. 

Karen Hudes ‏@KarenHudes  2h2 hours ago

US and other countries returning to the control of their populace: https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Twitter12.19.15.pdf 

And here is my response:

Second Letter to Sheriff Ward from Judge Anna Von Reitz

Please see to it that my SECOND Letter in support of your position gets delivered officially and with Witnesses to Sheriff Ward and any and all other federal "county" franchise officials, BLM staff, etc., They need to know this information ASAP for their own sakes as well as everyone else's. 

Dear Sheriff Ward, 

I have already sent you and the other "federal law enforcement agents" one letter. I did not expect to have to send you two. 

There are two kinds of people in this country according to the Definitive Treaty of Peace known as the Treaty of Paris, 1783, Article III and they are-- "the free sovereign and independent people of the United States" and the "inhabitants"-- British Loyalists and subjects of the British Crown who were allowed to stay here after the Revolutionary War. 

These are political statuses and as the Expatriation Act explains, the government is forbidden from interfering with our choice in the matter. 

This was more recently reiterated by the Geneva Protocols of 1949, Laws of War, Volume II, Article 3 forbids tampering with anyone's political status-- and it is a capital offense war crime if you do. 

The Hammonds and the Bundys have all made their political status choice very clear. They are members of the "free sovereign and independent people of the United States." They have self-declared their status and have given you Notice of the same and it is not within the powers of your office to alter this decision or offer to interpret anything about it. 

You and all your misinformed buddies owe the Hammonds and the Bundys "essential governmental services" under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2. And a HUGE apology. 

Those "services" do not include armed extortion, trespass on their private property, or any false claims or presumption of any ownership interest in them, their land, or their other assets. 

Cattle rustling, as you and your friends need to be reminded, is a capital CRIME in the western states and if you boys get out of line, these ranchers are well within their rights to invoke the Public Law and hang you all from the nearest trees. 

Somewhere in the back of your mind, you know that. 

A Message To, For, and About Great Britain

By Anna Von Reitz

Here are some pearls from Ed Johnston---
16th American Jurisprudence Section 177
(16 Am Jur. 2d. Const. Law Sect. 256)
The State did not give the Citizen his rights and thus cannot take them away as it chooses. The State did not establish the settled maxims and procedures by which a citizen must be dealt with, and thus cannot abrogate or circumvent them. It thus is well settled that legislative enactments do not constitute the law of the land, but must conform to it.
From the 16th American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177:
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. 
As unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted. Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it... A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, in so far as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”
Any court, government or government officer who acts in violation of, in opposition or contradiction to the foregoing, by his, or her own actions, commits treason and invokes the self-executing Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and vacates his or her, office.
__________________

Please note that The Constitution is for inhabitants of the Federal United States LITERALLY the law of the land--- because when they come in from their watery international jurisdiction, they are required to operate by the rules established by The Constitution on the land.
When reading Federal law, you must always read it from the Federal perspective. They operate in the international Jurisdiction of the Sea, so, of course, the national law they are obligated to respect when dealing with us is --from their perspective--- the Law of the Land.
It's the same reversal when they speak of "inhabitants"---- we are "peaceful inhabitants of the land" (14th Amendment of the corporate Constitution) from their perspective, whereas they are "inhabitants" of the "maritime regions and insular states" from ours.

Solving the problem of Individual Freedom and Sovereignty

by Anna Von Reitz

To All---

I am doing this with a skeleton staff and a huge amount of work on my table. I wish I could "do it all" and help people with their individual cases, too, but I can't. There are literally millions of Americans sitting in private for-profit jails who should not be there and trillions of dollars of American assets at risk. I have to keep my eye on the ball and we all have to keep moving forward as best we can. For me, that means pursuing the UN, the rats in DC, the World Bank. For the rest of you, that means educating yourselves, your families, your friends, your neighbors, and yes, the sheriffs and "county" officials and "state" officials and everyone else.

These groups of undeclared commercial mercenaries have "invaded" our country for the purpose of dispossessing us. The only thing that will stop them is a widespread public knowledge of who they are and what they are and an equally public and determined exposure of the facts.

How many "County" Sheriffs really want to prosecute innocent people under color of law? How many want to risk prosecution--- real prosecution under Public Law--- if they do?

That's what's coming, folks.

Any time that you incorporate anything, it falls under the international jurisdiction of the sea and under the Satanic Law of the Sea or the almost-as-bad Law Merchant.

So what do you do to get back to land?

The Truth About Karen Hudes, The World Bank, and Your Gold

By Anna Von Reitz

As the Federal Code Title 5 makes very clear the World Bank and IBRD were two of the three (Federal Reserve being the third) banking cartels that caused the bankruptcy of The United States of America, Inc. in 1933. 

As is also clear, the American People were the Priority Creditors of the bankrupt federal corporation (See House Joint Resolution 192 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1934) and also clear that the banks were Secondary Creditors.

When that bankruptcy was finally discharged and settled the World Bank received the actual gold--- the physical assets confiscated from our ancestors and which we are heir to--- as its part of the loot.  

Notice that the gold should have come back to the Priority Creditors—the American people--- but one the Secondary Creditors, The World Bank, claimed it instead.  

For seventy years that gold was used as the backing and basis for all the Federal Reserve Notes and loans.  The Federal Reserve, of course, received all the interest and profit generated as its part of the loot.  

And we, the legitimate heirs, received nothing.  Zip.  Nada.  Not even a thank you.

A Reply to "Snopes" and All Others from Anna Von Reitz

Yes, an Alaskan state judge HAS called upon the US Marshals and the rest of the "law enforcement agencies" to do their real job, and I am in a position to confirm it, as I am that judge. Your ignorance is no excuse in this matter.

There are two systems of law in this country, and it is long past time for you all to learn the facts.

When The Constitution was adopted there was already a Common Law Court System in this country that had been established for over 200 years. The Constitution created an additional "federal" court system for the needs of the "federal government"---- that court system is obligated to function in two venues only: administrative (Article I) and maritime/admiralty (Article III).

As you can see for yourself if you ever wake up and bother to look, the Seventh Amendment very clearly stipulates that ALL matters involving living people and their property assets in excess of $20 are to be decided under Common Law and as you can also readily find out Erie Railroad v. Thompkins (1938) there is no such thing as Federal Common Law.

Come Lord Jesus - That thy prophets may be found faithful!

Lesson From Isaias the Prophet.

Thus saith the Lord God: There shall come forth a rod out of the root of Jesse, and a flower shall rise up out of his root. And the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon Him: the spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the spirit of counsel and of fortitude, the spirit of knowledge and of godliness, and He shall be filled with the spirit of the fear of the Lord.
He shall not judge according to the sight of the eyes, nor reprove according to the hearing of the ears. But He shall judge the poor with justice, and shall reprove with equity for the meek of the earth: and He shall strike the earth with the rod of His mouth, and with the breath of His lips He shall slay the wicked.
And justice shall be the girdle of His loins: and faith the girdle of His reins.
----
Come Lord Jesus and make it so.

A New Resolution put out by Ammon Bundy concerning the Hammond Family.

A new resolution regarding the Hammond family.

Many of you, much like me, remember Ammon Bundy from the very first days and videos released from the Bundy Ranch Incident that later became a huge victory for the Liberty Movement. He was that cowboy that first faced off with the BLM tactical team. These were the same thugs that we saw tackle an elderly cancer survivor and sic attack dogs on a pregnant woman. In that first altercation, the patriots made a point of going un-armed. I still can see, in my minds eye, Ammon challenging the ATF soldiers asking who the real aggressors are and literally showing them that they had left their firearms at home, and they had left even their pocket knives. Well Ammon was tased 3 times that day. Again, I cherish the memory of Ammon cowboying up and challenging them to tase him again and again. It was after this situation, combined the “free speech” zones that the BLM had set up that looked to more suitable for holding small livestock than to practice our first amendment rights that we should be able to exercise anywhere within our borders, that were the last straw. It was then that we saw an organic uprising of patriots from a cross section of American culture come together to say to the Feds that we will no longer sit back idly and allow another family be massacred. At this point, we had received credible reports that the powers that be had snipers trained on the family home and things were being set up for another Waco. Not on our watch! The rally call went out and patriots put down their own lives to come and protect a family of fellow Americans.

Well Ammon’s sense of duty to stand up against the same tyrannical government overreach didn’t end when the BLM left the ranch. It is still running strong to this day. It was through Ammon Bundy that I first started hearing about the nightmares that the Hammond family have also been suffering. In a lot of ways, the harassment that the Hammonds have already suffered seem unbelievable. Ammon feels that he is being called by a higher power to stand up for the Hammond family. If you are not familiar with what the Hammonds have already been through, please take the time to read this post from the Bundy Family blog spot page. It is the most comprehensive history about what is happening the Hammond family to date.

The latest development has been that Ammon is now putting together a resolution that is addressed to the local county government here is the resolution in it’s entirety:

New Year Ham Class Schedule for January 2016

Get your Ham Radio License in Eureka

Classes coming up in January

Friday January 8th  5:00 PM to 9:00 PM
Saturday Jan. 9th 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM
Friday Jan. 15th 5:00 PM to 9:00 PM
Saturday Jan. 16th 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM
Friday Jan. 22nd 5:00 PM to 9:00 PM
Saturday Jan. 23rd 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM
Saturday Jan. 23rd is TEST DAY
Glacier Bank Meeting Room (top floor) in Eureka Montana

Ham radio is the best emergency and safety network available and will be used locally as well as world wide in the event of any disasters, natural or man made.

Study books will be available at the first class.
You will need to register for the class to get a book by calling Don Johnson at 406 889 5886

The Technician license does not require Morse code, and the test is just 35 questions multiple choice. You can get 9 questions wrong and still pass, and during the study you will be given all the answers up front.  You can also study on line at          www.hamtestonline.com  or you can take practice tests for free and QRZ.COM

The license is free for 10 years, then renew on line for another 10 years.  We will have equipment on display and there will be demonstrations of various equipment. Eureka Repeater Group sponsoring the class has many local repeaters covering all of Lincoln County and into Flathead county, and much more.

Be prepared to increase your safety by having communications available in any emergency situation at any time day or night with these systems.

General Douglas MacArthur on who the Military owes their allegiance to.

"The Network of Global Corporate Control" from General Douglas MacArthur's speech on July 25, 1951 to the Massachusetts state Legislature in Boston:
“I find in existence a new and heretofore unknown and dangerous concept that the members of our Armed Forces owe primary allegiance and loyalty to those who temporarily exercise the authority of the executive branch of government, rather than to the country and its Constitution which they are sworn to defend. No proposition could be more dangerous. None could cast a greater doubt upon the integrity of the armed services.
For its application would at once convert them from their traditional and constitutional role as the instrument for the defense of the Republic into something partaking of the nature of a PRAETORIAN GUARD, owing its allegiance to the political master of the hour.

Letter to John Kerry and Ban Ki-Moon from Anna Von Reitz

The attached letter to John Kerry and Ban Ki Moon was mailed this morning 12/14/2015.  It addresses--- in a very forthright manner --- the refusal of the Federal United States to expedite and respect the political status changes and choices which must be made available as remedy to the American people.

It also addresses the recently revealed transfer of American gold to the "County Executives" by the World Bank/IBRD.  As these "County Executives" hold no public offices related to us, the actual Beneficiaries, and are at best con- men pretending to have standing as Secondary Beneficiaries (just like the World Bank and IBRD)-- this is a matter of grave concern to Americans and obvious collusion between the World Bank/IBRD and the "county executives"--- whomever and whatever they are--- they aren't our counties and not our county executives.

December 14, 2015

John Kerry, US Secretary of State

2201 C Street NW

Washington, DC 20520

Ban Ki-Moon, UN Secretary General 

United Nations Secretariat

New York, NY 10017

Dear Sirs: 

This is a matter of urgent importance. It concerns either mistaken identity or identity theft, depending upon each man’s estimate of the situation. 

Very briefly: at the end of the American Revolutionary War two distinct groups of people lived in the former Colonies as memorialized in the Treaty of Paris 1783, Article III:  the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” and the “inhabitants”.   The “inhabitants” were and are --from the perspective of the “free sovereign and independent people”—British Loyalists and subjects of the Crown permitted to co-habit our land via Treaty of Peace.  

At the end of the American Civil War, President Andrew Johnson declared peace on the land via three separate proclamations establishing an undisputed Treaty of Peace and commercial contract obligation honoring the fact that the “free sovereign and independent people of the United States” were at peace and we have remained so ever since.  No such peace was ever declared for the “inhabitants” and no Peace Treaty in their behalf was ever signed, with the result that they have been at constant war since 1860. 

Two new blockbuster articles from Judge Anna

I have published them on both the website at  annavonreitz.com, and on the blog at montanablog.us  Articles 98 and 99.

The new stats for the website are very interesting. In one week we have almost quadrupled the new visitors to the site.

What that means is that Americans are looking for solutions to the criminal activity of the cabal, and for freedom from persecution by the cabal.

Keep studying and probably the most important thing you can do right now is to spread this information far and wide.

Americans are waking up by the millions right now, and they are very concerned about some kind of attack on America.

There are some things you can do locally to prepare for the worst. Go to the Oathkeepers.org website and join, then get in one of their community preparedness teams and get some training.

You can always call me for answers to your questions about all this.  My phone hours are 8 AM to 8 PM weekdays at  800 889 2839.

pstramer@gmail.com

Paul Stramer

The Second Foundation -- The Nature of Man and Corporations - Anna Von Reitz

In the First Foundation we learned that Law and Religion are intimately connected and that in fact all Law with the exception of Natural Law, derives from specific religious traditions.  The Law of the Land in the West derives from the Mosaic Law and the Judeo-Christian religions.  This is supposed to be the Law of the American Nation.  The Law of the Sea derives from the religion of Ancient Summer and Babylon, which worshipped a pantheon of gods including their god of the sea, which we call Satan.  The Law Merchant which is also Law of the Sea derives from the Code of Hammurabi also developed by these ancient Middle Eastern religions.

We learned that even to this day the world is peopled with followers of these ancient and profane hedonistic cults, which have largely been suppressed and driven into secrecy, but continue to impact the world in disastrous ways nonetheless. These people worship the Father of All Lies.  For them, a lie is a prayer.  They use sex as a sacrament, worship in sacred groves, practice execution by fire, infanticide, and defilement as a doctrine.  Their chief goddess, Semiramis, goes by many names--- Isis, Cybele, Astarte, Ashtoreth, and even the Statue of Liberty.  She is the “Mother of Idols, Harlots, and the Abominations of the World”.

We also learned that idolatry is alive and well in the modern world and that all the forms of money and credit we commonly use involve “graven images” and are in fact idols--- something symbolic that stands for something real, as in a piece of paper that claims to represent the value of a man’s labor.

Anna goes viral - almost 4 times increase in one week!

Weekly Stats Report: 7 Dec - 13 Dec 2015
Project: Annavonreitz.com
URL: http://www.annavonreitz.com

Summary

	Mon	Tues	Wed	Thur	Fri	Sat	Sun	Total	Avg
Pageloads	2,292	790	626	593	2,443	3,301	1,679	11,724	1,675
Unique Visits	1,988	708	532	497	2,125	2,907	1,452	10,209	1,458
First Time Visits	1,637	473	332	303	1,899	2,552	1,134	8,330	1,190
Returning Visits	351	235	200	194	226	355	318	1,879	268

Updated Live Affidavit from Anna Von Reitz

Updated – Live Affidavit to: Common Law Citizen’s Grand Jury HQ and John Daresh

by arnierosner

On Aug 21, 2015, at 11:51 PM, Anna von Reitz wrote:

Moving on we are diligently processing all the Notice functions and court work…..

Please find the copy of the letter accompanying the live affidavit being sent to the Common Law Citizen’s Grand Jury HQ and John Daresh.

Herein I explain one of the things that seems to be befuddling so many people about the Citizen’s Common Law Grand Jury Movement and why it can’t seem to gain traction despite all the brave words.

It’s really very simple. To enforce the presentments and indictments of a Common Law Grand Jury you need the rest of an apparatus of a Common Law Court System — Common Law Judges, Trial Juries, Sheriffs on the Land, Bailiffs, Clerks…..

This seems stupidly obvious when I say it out loud, but apparently the necessity of rebuilding on the Justices of the Peace at the County level and upon the very, very few State Common Law Judges that are operating Common Law Courts and the even fewer Federal Postal Judges—- has not yet occurred to everyone.

From the Desk of Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

c/o Post Office Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

Via U.S. Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested

7012 3460 0003 4344 9927

August 21, 2015

Mr. John Daresh

United United States Common Law Grand Jury

In Care of: P.O. Box 59

Valhalla, New York 10595

RE: American Affidavit

Dear Sir:

We attempted to deliver this published and bound Affidavit of Probable Cause to your Alaska Grand Jury Membership, but it was returned to us unopened and for unstated reasons.   We are therefore forwarding it to the National Headquarters.

This is a “live” Affidavit of Probable Cause containing original wet-ink signatures and individual seals of the living men and women and their organic states of the union.

As we have been watching your activities unfold we realize that you are laboring under some of the same misinformation that has been so much a part of the development of the present circumstance.

Please carefully read and examine the evidence and history presented by our affidavit. This will shed considerable light on the overall circumstance.

Sent to Pope Francis This Morning

Most Beloved Francis:

This is to make explicit what to you is already at least partially known:

1. We have the technology to control and moderate both the short and long term carbon cycles on this planet;

2. We have the technology to control and seal the cascade nuclear reactions in Japan and can prevent similar disasters in the Marshal Islands and elsewhere;

3. We have the means to quiet and forestall earthquakes on a planetary basis;

4. No sin of Mankind is beyond forgiveness and repair, so long as that sin is recognized for what it is and repented;

5. It is this item (4) that is of immediate concern;

6.  There can be no misuse of the current environmental problems as an excuse to promote or prolong any further enslavement or taxation of Mankind;

7. There are among your members at the Paris Summit and even among those advising you at the Vatican --- we hesitate to call them "people"--- who see the deplorable destruction they have caused to the planet as yet another excuse to control others and impose unjust taxation upon the innocent;

8.  This must not be allowed;

9.  You are called upon to mediate a just settlement and there is no justice in blaming and charging innocent people for these sins;

10.   You have been told that there will be no scapegoats.  Take it to heart.

"It is time for you to act, O, Lord, for they have regarded your law as void."  --- Psalm 119:126.

Anna Maria

anu-hotep

See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:  www.annavonreitz.com

Midnight Ride - When Rogue Politicians Call for Martial Law

This is the full version released by James Jaeger, and might be the most important new movie of this year, and is certainly critically important to the future of our country.



a JAMES JAEGER Film -- Featuring RON PAUL, PAT BUCHANAN, SHERIFF MACK, STEWART RHODES, PASTOR CHUCK BALDWIN, EDWIN VIEIRA, JR., G. EDWARD GRIFFIN, LARRY PRATT, WALTER REDDY, Dan Happel, David R. Gillie, Elias Alias, Erich Pratt, Jack Rooney, Rosie Haas and Sheila Matthews. 

A presentation of MATRIX PRODUCTIONS in association with OATH KEEPERS and BRAEBURN ENTERTAINMENT. 

Inspired by the works of Edwin Vieira, Jr. Produced by Richard B. Iott and Brian G. Rockey. Narrated by Kris Chandler. 

Have you noticed the police and surveilance state being quietly built around us since 9/11?

MIDNIGHT RIDE -- the sister film to MOLON LABE -- explores what would happen if the dollar crashed taking the world financial system down with it? How would this police state be used in the ensuing civil unrest? Would martial law be declared? If it were, would this be Consitutional? Should such martial law be obeyed? The concerned citizen should be asking these questions.

MIDNIGHT RIDE -- inspired by the book, "BY TYRANNY OUT OF NECESSITY: The Bastardy of Martial Law" by Edwin Vieira, Jr., available at Amazon -- explores the nature of martial law and how it relates to the Second Amendment and militia clauses in the U.S. Constitution.

Anyone who likes MIDNIGHT RIDE and wants to support the effort is invited to purchase copies of it on DVD and/or donate to the marketing campaign. Donate at http://www.midnightride.us/donate and get DVDs athttp://www.MidnightRide.us/dvds 

Other films by James Jaeger and Matrix Productions -- such as MOLON LABE, SPOILER, ORIGINAL INTENT, CULTURAL MARXISM, CORPORATE FASCISM and FIAT EMPIRE -- are available on DVD athttp://www.MoviePubs.net

Record First Time Visitors to annavonreitz.com

Weekly Stats Report: 30 Nov - 6 Dec 2015
Project: Annavonreitz.com
URL: http://www.annavonreitz.com

Summary

	Mon	Tues	Wed	Thur	Fri	Sat	Sun	Total	Avg
Pageloads	545	467	503	369	337	295	1,048	3,564	509
Unique Visits	489	396	419	318	303	257	931	3,113	445
First Time Visits	379	286	302	201	187	165	803	2,323	332
Returning Visits	110	110	117	117	116	92	128	790	113

If BLM wants your land they will just BURN YOU OUT.

BLM Destroying Ranches by Fire

Published on Dec 5, 2015

This BLM fire reportedly killed more than 80 head of cattle. Put ranchers trying to save their cattle in extreme danger, injured other cattle, burnt homes and structures, burnt fences and power poles and threatened the town of Frenchglen.

Attorney General Comment Draws Response From MSSA President Gary Marbut

Found here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NltSOHIhBJM

The Natural Law as a Restraint Against Tyranny | Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

Published on Nov 19, 2014

Recorded at the Mises Circle in Costa Mesa, California, 8 November 2014. This seminar examines the institutions of a stateless society and explore topics such as private defense, private police, privately produced money, the role of markets, and how stateless legal systems would work.

The US Civil Flag - What does it mean?

This is the U.S. Civil Flag sometimes flown at ports of entry and formerly flown on Revenue Cutters before they became Coast Guard Cutters. It's purpose is to be a demarcation between the Jurisdiction of the Sea, or Admiralty/Maritime law, and the Jurisdiction of the Land, known as common law. It also denotes Peace on the Land and says the inhabitants of the land in America are at peace not war. It's only the mostly foreign owned, for profit corporation calling itself the federal government that is at war, NOT America's people. We should be PEACEMAKERS and we should be in a strictly defensive posture at home and abroad, unless and until we are attacked. We should not be fighting wars of aggression abroad, and thereby creating additional enemies. But if we are attacked, like we seem to be right now with all these shootings, then we should spare no effort to find those responsible and bring them to justice. If that requires war, and the perpetrators have left no doubt as to their intentions against our country, then we should bring the wrath of Almighty God against them in order, and only insofar as it is necessary to STOP THE THREAT to our peace and tranquility. Sadly that has not happened since the 2nd World War. It's time to change our policies, not only overseas but here at home as well. It's time to revitalize the Militia of the Several States under the elective and delegated power of the Sheriff and/or Governors.
Find a copy of the new movie called "Midnight Ride" and watch how real Americans are supposed to act in time of mortal threat against our country!
Watch the trailer and buy the movie on DVD here:
http://www.midnightride.us/html/

If you want a flag like this one, which I am flying on my deck at home go to uscivilflags.org

Paul Stramer  KC7MEZ

What is the plan? Show me step by step, is the question we get most often.

From the desk of Judge Anna Von Reitz
November 30, 2015
Big Lake Alaska

The answer is simple--- the counties have to operate as counties on the land again, that is, as UNINCORPORATED Body Politics.  Any time you incorporate something, you move it off the jurisdiction of the land and into the jurisdiction of the sea---- and therein lies the rub. 

Out of 50 "States" and 3100 counties all of them have incorporated and are therefore officially operating as "federal" franchises of the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION---- like local Burger King franchises.  That does not prohibit any of them from ALSO functioning as states and counties on the land jurisdiction, but we've been such clueless dumb clucks that we weren't aware of any need to do so.  We have been deceived and "assumed" that that "thing" calling itself "Jackson County" or the "County of Jackson" was our lawful county on the land --- and that we didn't HAVE TO do anything more or organize anything or operate any Body Politic other than that. 

Now you can talk to the incorporated counties and their officers about this situation and encourage them to act in both roles---putting on one hat and singing the corporate song, and then putting on another hat and singing "Yankee Doodle"---- which is what they did for quite a number of years---- but in the end, no man can serve two masters.  It is best to just hold explicit elections for the land offices---- advertise public meetings to organize the county on the land, take nominations for the offices of the land jurisdiction--- call your courts, etc., by recognizable names like, "Jackson County Land Office" and "Jackson County Common Law Court" and so on.  At first, everyone has to serve pro bono and as volunteers.  That in no way alters the lawfulness of the office or our actions. 

And just let the incorporated "County" deal with its watery international issues and "US citizens" which are in reality few and far between. 

Once you have elected one or two County Judges, a County Sheriff, County Clerk, Bailiff, Coroner, etc., and sworn them in, the Sheriff can in turn (just like John Wayne) swear in as many Deputies on the Land as he needs to enforce the jurisdiction of the land. 

So what is the jurisdiction of the land?  It's everything and anything that was not specifically delegated as an enumerated "power"---and responsibility---- of the "federal government".  ALL other prerogatives are reserved to the States on the Land and the people.  

The position of all these "federal franchise" "States" and "Counties" is actually very weak and unattractive.  They are receiving back increasingly smaller dribs and drabs of "federal revenue sharing"---- which is their cut from the fraud that has been practiced against all of us by claiming that we "volunteered" to function as Federal United States Citizens and as chattel belonging to the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation and donated all our assets to the Public Charitable Trust in exchange for the privilege of receiving welfare benefits (and paying for them) and Social Security "benefits" (which we also had to pay for and never get any reasonable return from).  In other words, their kick-back for participating in the enslavement and abuse of their friends, families, and neighbors by private, mostly foreign-owned corporations follows a law of diminishing returns.   

Once people wake up and realize what a scourge and fraud scheme this has been, nobody will want to serve any "federal" county or "federal" state, either.  

Judge Anna

See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:  www.annavonreitz.com
----------------------------------
Note from Paul Stramer,
It costs a bit to keep this blog going, for the research, the time away from our business, the server space and bandwidth, and the phone to field questions. If you would like to help with that please donate what you can once, or make a monthly contribution.
Here is the PayPal link to support this work:

Dear Federal Agents - From Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

November 28, 2015
Big Lake, Alaska


Dear Federal Agents:

I am addressing this letter in this way, because it is my understanding that it will be read by members of both the FBI and the US Marshals Service.   It is also my understanding that you have available for examination a wet-ink signed copy of the illustrated affidavit of probable cause entitled “You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”  as back-up reference and evidence.

Since the publication of the affidavit a plethora of new supporting documentation and evidence has come to light.  We found, for example, that on June 30, 1864, the members of Congress acting as the Board of Directors of a private, mostly foreign-owned corporation doing business as “The United States of America, Incorporated” changed the meaning of “state”, “State” and “United States” to mean “District of Columbia Municipal Corporation”.

Like the 1862 change of the meaning of the word “person” to mean “corporation” cited in our affidavit, these special coded meanings of words render a drastically different picture of the world around us.

It turns out that your “personal bank account” is actually a “corporate bank account”.   The “Colorado State Court” is actually the “Colorado District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Court”.

If you are shocked to learn these facts, you are not alone.  So are millions of other Americans.  These changes were made 150 years ago and tucked away in reams of boring meeting minutes and legalistic gobbledygook meant to be applied only to the internal workings of a private governmental services corporation and its employees. 

There was no public announcement, just as there was no public announcement or explanation when Congress created “municipal citizenship” known as “US citizenship” in 1868.  Properly, technically, even to this day, this form of “citizenship” applies only to those born in the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and other Insular States, so there was no real reason to educate the general public about the topic. As Congress was secretively using the labor and the private property assets of these  “citizens” as collateral backing the corporate debts of “The United States of America, Inc.” there was plenty of reason to obscure this development.  At the end of the Civil War it would have been very unpopular to reveal that they were simply changing gears from private sector slave ownership to public sector slave ownership.

You may be surprised to learn that slavery was not abolished by the Thirteenth or any other Amendment to any constitution then or now.   Instead, slavery was redefined as the punishment meted out to criminals. Look it up and read it for yourselves.

For a little hope in a bleak world read these two articles

Two almost completely different scenarios.  The same end.  We Win.

A couple of short stories to bring some ideas forward.

Please comment by clicking the title of this article above, and scrolling down to the comments box.

https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2012/09/03/bracken-when-the-music-stops-how-americas-cities-may-explode-in-violence/

https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/what-i-saw-at-the-coup/

7-minute book report with Rich Scheben. "An American Affidavit of Probable Cause"

Posted on November 28, 2015by arnierosner

“You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”

by arnierosner

Here is a 7-minute book report audio file with Rich Scheben, about Judge Anna Von Reitzinger’s book “You Know Something Is Wrong When”

I highly recommend this book as a foundational wake-up syllabus for concerned, responsible people.  They’ve been lying to us since the removal of the original 13th amendment.

If not us, WHO?

Open with your preferred player.

https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/annas-audio-book-report.mp3?_=1

Sheriff in Hammonds' County needs an education about his duty.

Letter below prepared by a leader in Arizona. It is a clear explanation of the Sheriff's lack of understanding.

Thanks everyone for the quick support you have offered for the Hammonds. The Sheriff has received an overwhelming # of emails already in support of the Hammonds. Many of you emailed the Sheriff recently have received an email clarifying which side of the fence the sheriff is on. It appears he currently stands with the BLM and their unconstitutional jurisdiction of the land.

            The Burns county sheriff's email has brought up many questions in regard to what this fight is all about raising many questions about the Hammonds. From emails we have received from Ammon, it appeared this issue was clear cut and all about Rancher's vs BLM, personal property rights vs agenda 21 & the sustainability movement, states rights vs federal control etc. Then we received this transcript of the court proceedings and it appears to some now that it is not that clear cut. Well, I've read and reread the court proceeding transcript and it is clear to me that Ammon's emails were not misleading.

Link to Sheriff's response letter to Hammond Supporters: http://bundyranch.blogspot.com/

            First let's acknowledge what was said in the court by the prosecutor that greatly effected the jury's decision and influenced many who just read the court proceedings. The concerning accusations brought against the Hammond's in this transcript that most had not heard about include poaching, starting a fire to burn the evidence, and endangering firefighters in the process. That sounds pretty bad. Who would stand behind such hardened criminals? No one. We definitely don't support such actions and would not want to be found supporting those who did such things right? Of course not.

The Missing 13th Amendment: *No Lawyers Allowed In Public Office*

13th Amendment — Missing

Written by David M. Dodge, Researcher
Date: 08/01/91

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn, were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.

By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a 13th Amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. Moreover, after studying the Amendment’s language and historical context, they realized the principle
intent of this “missing” 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government. So began a seven year, nationwide search for the truth surrounding the most bizarre Constitutional puzzle in American history — the unlawful removal of a ratified Amendment from the Constitution of the United States.

Since 1983, Dodge and Dunn have uncovered additional copies of the Constitution with the “missing” 13th Amendment printed in at least eighteen separate publications by ten different states and territories over four decades from 1822 to 1860. In June of this year (1991), Dodge uncovered the evidence that this missing 13th Amendment had indeed been lawfully ratified by the state of Virginia and was therefore an authentic Amendment to the American Constitution. If the evidence is correct and no logical errors have been made, a 13th Amendment restricting lawyers from serving in government was ratified in 1819 and removed from the U.S. Constitution during the tumult of the Civil War. Since the Amendment was never lawfully repealed, it is still the Law today. The implications are enormous.

Read this entire article here: 

http://themillenniumreport.com/2015/10/the-missing-13th-amendment-no-lawyers-allowed-in-public-office/#more-18986

An excerpt:

"On February 28, 1818, Secretary of State Adams reported the rejection of the Amendment by South Carolina. [House Doc. No. 129]. There are no further entries regarding the ratification of the 13th Amendment in the Journals of Congress; whether Virginia ratified is neither confirmed nor denied. Likewise, a search through the executive papers of Governor Preston of Virginia does not reveal any correspondence from Secretary of State Adams. (However, there is a journal entry in the Virginia House that the Governor presented the House with an official letter and documents from Washington within a time frame that conceivably includes receipt of Adams’ letter.) Again, no evidence of ratification; none of denial.

However, on March 10, 1819, the Virginia legislature passed Act No. 280 (Virginia Archives of Richmond, “misc.’ file, p. 299 for micro-film): “Be it enacted by the General Assembly, that there shall be published an edition of the Laws of this Commonwealth in which shall be contained the following matters, that is to say: the Constitution of the united States and the amendments thereto…” This act was the specific legislated instructions on what was, by law, to be included in the re-publication (a special edition) of the Virginia Civil Code. The Virginia Legislature had already agreed that all Acts were to go into effect on the same day — the day that the Act to re-publish the Civil Code was enacted. Therefore, the 13th Amendment’s official date of ratification would be the date of
re-publication of the Virginia Civil Code: March 12, 1819.

The Delegates knew Virginia was the last of the 13 States that were necessary for the ratification of the 13th Amendment. They also knew there were powerful forces allied against this ratification so they took extraordinary measures to make sure that it was published in sufficient quantity (4,000 copies were ordered, almost triple their usual order), and instructed the printer to send a copy to President James Monroe as well as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. (The printer, Thomas Ritchie, was bonded. He was required to be extremely accurate in his research and his printing, or he would forfeit his bond.)

In this fashion, Virginia announced the ratification: by publication and dissemination of the Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution.  There is question as to whether Virginia ever formally notified the Secretary of State that they had ratified this 13th Amendment. Some have argued that because such notification was not received (or at least, not recorded), the Amendment was therefore not legally ratified. However, printing by a legislature is prima facie evidence of ratification. Further, there is no Constitutional requirement that the Secretary of State, or anyone else, be officially notified to complete the ratification process. The Constitution only requires that three-fourths of the states ratify for an Amendment to be added to the Constitution. If three-quarters of the states ratify, the Amendment is passed. Period. The Constitution is otherwise silent on what procedure should be used to announce, confirm, or
communicate the ratification of amendments.

Knowing they were the last state necessary to ratify the Amendment, the Virginians had every right announce their own and the nation’s ratification of the Amendment by publishing it on a special edition of the Constitution, and so they did.

Word of Virginia’s 1819 ratification spread throughout the States and both Rhode Island and Kentucky published the new Amendment in 1822. Ohio first published in 1824. Maine ordered 10,000 copies of the Constitution with the 13th Amendment to be printed for use in the schools in 1825, and again in 1831 for their Census Edition. Indiana Revised Laws of 1831 published the 13th Article on p. 20. Northwestern Territories published in 1833. Ohio published in 1831 and 1833. Then came the Wisconsin Territory in 1839; Iowa Territory in 1843; Ohio again, in 1848; Kansas Statutes in 1855; and Nebraska Territory six times in a row from 1855 to 1860. So far, David Dodge has identified eleven different states or territories that printed the Amendment in twenty separate publications over forty-one years. And more editions including this 13th Amendment are sure to be discovered. Clearly, Dodge is onto something.

You might be able to convince some of the people, or maybe even all of them, for a little while, that this 13th Amendment was never ratified. Maybe you can show them that the ten legislatures which ordered it published eighteen times we’ve discovered (so far) consisted of ignorant politicians who don’t know their amendments from their… ahh, articles. You might even be able to convince the public that our U.S. forefathers never meant to “outlaw” public servants who pushed people around, accepted bribes or special favors to “look the other way.” Maybe. But before you do, there’s an awful lot of evidence to be explained.

THE AMENDMENT DISAPPEARS

In 1829, the following note appears on p. 23, Vol. 1 of the New York Revised Statutes:

“In the edition of the Laws of the U.S. before referred to, there is an amendment printed as article 13, prohibiting citizens from accepting titles of nobility or honor, or presents, offices, &c. from foreign nations. But, by a message of the president of the United States of the 4th of February, 1818, in answer to a resolution of the house of representatives, it appears that this amendment had been ratified only by 12 states, and therefore had not been adopted. See Vol. IV of the printed papers of the 1st session of the 15th congress, No. 76.” In 1854, a similar note appeared in the Oregon Statutes. Both notes refer to the Laws of the United States, 1st vol. p. 73 (or 74).

It’s not yet clear whether the 13th Amendment was published in Laws of the United States, 1st Vol., prematurely, by accident, in anticipation of Virginia’s ratification, or as part of a plot to discredit the Amendment by making it appear that only twelve States had ratified. Whether the Laws of the United States Vol. 1 (carrying the 13th Amendment) was re-called or made-up is unknown. In fact, it’s not even clear that the specified volume was actually printed — the Law Library of the Library of Congress has no record of its existence.

However, because the noted authors reported no further references to the 13th Amendment after the Presidential letter of February, 1818, they apparently assumed the ratification process had ended in failure at that time. If so, they neglected to seek information on the Amendment after 1818, or at the state level, and therefore missed the evidence of Virginia’s ratification. This opinion — assuming that the Presidential letter of February, 1818, was the last word on the Amendment — has persisted to this day.

In 1849, Virginia decided to revise the 1819 Civil Code of Virginia (which had contained the 13th Amendment for 30 years). It was at that time that one of the code’s revisers (a lawyer named Patton) wrote to the Secretary of the Navy, William B. Preston, asking if this Amendment had been ratified or appeared by mistake. Preston wrote to J. M. Clayton, the Secretary of State, who replied that this Amendment was not ratified by a sufficient number of States. This conclusion was based upon the information that Secretary of State John Quincy Adams had provided the House of Representatives in 1818, before Virginia’s ratification in 1819. (Even today, the Congressional Research Service tells anyone asking about this 13th Amendment this same story: that only twelve states, not the
requisite thirteen, had ratified.)

However, despite Clayton’s opinion, the Amendment continued to be published in various states and territories for at least another eleven years (the last known publication was in the Nebraska territory in 1860). Once again the 13th Amendment was caught in the riptides of American politics. South Carolina seceded from the Union in December of 1860, signaling the onset of the Civil War. In March, 1861, President Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated.

Later in 1861, another proposed amendment, also numbered thirteen, was signed by President Lincoln. This was the only proposed amendment that was ever signed by a president. That resolve to amend read:

“ARTICLE THIRTEEN, No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

In other words, President Lincoln had signed a resolve that would have permitted slavery, and upheld states’ rights. Only one State, Illinois, ratified this proposed amendment before the Civil War broke out in 1861. In the tumult of 1865, the original 13th Amendment was finally removed from the US Constitution. On January 31, another 13th Amendment (which prohibited slavery in Sect. 1, and ended states’ rights in Sect. 2) was proposed. On April 9, the Civil War ended with General Lee’s surrender. On April 14, President Lincoln (who, in 1861, had signed the proposed Amendment that would have allowed slavery and states rights) was assassinated. On December 6, the “new” 13th Amendment loudly prohibiting slavery (and quietly surrendering states rights to the federal government) was ratified, replacing and effectively erasing the original 13th Amendment that had prohibited “titles of nobility” and “honors”.