By Anna Von Reitz
Everything has its genesis from something else in our Universe, from the instantaneous point we call "Source" to the final jot of existence, so that the question, "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" really begs the question --- "Where did the chicken or the egg, either one, come from?"
What mysterious force has resulted in their appearance, their profound ordering of substance within themselves, and the immense amounts of energy required to create and build that order, maintain it, and then, to release it, back to whence it has come?
So it is when we embark on a study of law, which leads to a study of religion, and then to the history of religion, that finally reveals so much about where concepts of "government" come from.
You have probably heard mention of "the Rule of Law", and wondered --- if you've been following along --- what's a Rule compared to a Law? What does "Rule of Law" mean?
More fast ones and substitutions?
Yes, as it turns out.
The use of Rules comes from early Church Orders, primarily Augustinian and Benedictine, that were established as the foundational principles and purposes of these Orders. These Rules were supposed to apply to all members of the Order, both priests and lay members, and provided a definition of purpose and agreement that all were expected to know and abide by.
The combination of the two concepts, "Rule" and "Law" in "Rule of Law" is therefore, as we have so often seen in other settings, oxymoronic.
A Rule is not a Law and a Law is not a Rule, and they are in fact mutually exclusive; a rule is voluntarily accepted by individuals according to their values, conscience, and beliefs, whereas a law is externally imposed under force without regard for personal conscience, values, or beliefs.
Elevating Law to the level of a Rule suggests the slave-like subservience of the individual conscience to whatever external authority or government is generating whatever form of "Law".
It does in fact imply the loss of an individual conscience or will.
Let's give an example --- the issue of abortion on demand.
For a number of years, this was "the Law" externally imposed; the exercise of the Law, however, was left to the Rule of individual conscience.
All this sudden talk about "the Rule of Law" and its implications has therefore sparked considerable consternation, wonder, and debate.
It suggests the existence of individuals either naturally not having a conscience or will, or the creation of a population of subhumans deprived of their right to exercise their conscience and freewill: slaves.
Certainly, robots have only an artificial conscience or will dependent on the decisions and values of their programmers, and a system of law pertaining to the operations and programming of robots might be described as the Rule of Law, simply because they have no independent will or conscience.
The second, more sinister meaning could be reference to a system of law applied to people arbitrarily defined as "subhuman" --- or as the case actually is, "transhumans".
The U.S. Supreme Court case, Biden v Missouri, revealed the intent of the vaccine patent holders to claim that the people who received the mRNA jab have been turned into Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and are now owned by the patent holders and redefined as "transhumans" having no natural and unalienable rights and no Human Rights, either.
This repugnant claim was supported by the U.S. Supreme Court and is most likely the reason that the attorneys are babbling gobbledygook about the Rule of Law; it would apply to these Transhumans as they would be slaves and have no ability to express their freewill or conscience.
We suggest that it is more than past time to dissolve all these offending corporations and put the attorneys permanently out of business.
Foreseeing this venal agenda, our State Assemblies came together and passed our first Public Law in over a hundred years, forbidding the exercise of any such claims against living people on our land and soil.
We have also moved swiftly to overturn earlier such attempts to self-interestedly "redefine" us as British Subjects and U.S. Citizens, and from there, to confer the crippling "citizen of the United States" status on us, without our knowledge or consent and without our agreement.
All these horrific and criminal activities have hinged on arbitrarily
redefining living people as something "else" --- humans, subjects, and now, transhumans, using illegal, undisclosed, unconscionable, and implied contracts, and then enforcing this gobbledygook using corrupt courts and foreign systems of law.
redefining living people as something "else" --- humans, subjects, and now, transhumans, using illegal, undisclosed, unconscionable, and implied contracts, and then enforcing this gobbledygook using corrupt courts and foreign systems of law.
Reducing a man to a "human" and then to a "transhuman" -- aka, "subhuman" is no different from what the Nazis did to the Jews.
It is just as repugnant, just as immoral, illegal, and unlawful, only it is being applied in a wholesale and indiscriminate fashion by commercial corporations engaged in crimes of state.
It has been our observation that the Roman Church has been deeply infiltrated by immoral influences and evil men who have used the Church as a "storefront" and cover for their heinous activities. The same phenomenon has beset the leadership structures of other religions, too. This has led to a broad spectrum failure of nearly all religious faiths and institutions to oppose the burgeoning evil in our midst.
Many people have wondered about the misuse and abuse of our public hospitals and the weaponization of medicine to promote mass genocide. We have pointed out on numerous occasions that medical doctors, nurses, dentists, and other medical professionals and even hair stylists who accept a "license" to serve federal citizens or to work in facilities receiving federal funding, are defined as "Uniformed Officers" under Federal Code Titles 8, 11, and 31, and not only can such officers be conscripted against their will into the military, but are also deemed to be part of an unseen "civilian military".
Civilian military. Another oxymoron.
This foreign licensure of occupations of common right and the brain-washing and coercive power of the American Medical Association operating as a Professional Guild that is enabled to withhold credentials, has made it easy to weaponize medical services against the Public Good, and provided an undisclosed means to undermine public health for commercial profit.
How did such a crooked system ever come to be? How and why would doctors and nurses be imposed upon to function as soldiers and be looking at average innocent people as "enemy combatants"?
Look to Church History. At about the time of William the Conqueror's death in 1087, things were getting increasingly difficult for the Crusaders in Jerusalem...
Here, linked below, is a timely reminder and insight into how our "hospitals" were first literally defined and managed by the Order of the Hospitaliers, who became a completely militarized Order similar to the much-later Jesuits and earlier Templars:
Hospitals, according to the admitted history and records of the Order, have been militarized since 1099, twelve years after the death of William the Conqueror.
Hospitals were first created to serve the sick, wounded, and dying soldiers of the Church during the Crusades, and though they have become public institutions funded by public money, their basic nature and character as military organizations has not changed.
The actual name of the Order is: The Military Religious Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem.
Our "military" has actually been functioning as a mercenary organization since the 1860s, and our "public" hospitals are organized as for-profit corporations that are franchises of the same parent corporations as Pfizer and Moderna and.... it does not take rocket science for us to figure out that the mercenaries employed by the parent corporations in the District of Columbia made use of their "Uniformed Officers" to murder and maim and enslave people for profit during the recent events mischaracterized as a pandemic.
Donald Trump wasn't duped, though he may have been used as a storefront by Fauci and the other criminals, similar to the Roman Catholic Church being used as a storefront by the Roman Pontiff.
The truth will be told by what happens to Fauci, Pfizer, Gates, the CDC and the NIH and the medical services sector in days to come.
So far all that has happened to address one of the greatest crimes in human history and Mr. Trump's own culpability for "Operation Warp Speed" is half a trillion dollars spent on an all-encompassing AI surveillance grid designed to monitor our vital signs and brain activity from space, something nobody wants except those who wish to control and micro-manage everyone else.
This "service" is nothing we contracted to receive and is a gross misappropriation of our money, an endangerment to our lives, and an unconstitutional invasion of our privacy -----and we count on everyone reading this to get the point.
Thumbs down, Mr. Trump.
We also don't appreciate the recently introduced bill seeking to approve the use of Artificial Intelligence to replace our doctors. They may be stupid and corrupt, but some of them still have a conscience, which is more than we can guarantee from AI.
Thumbs down again, Mr. Trump.
If we see any more phony epidemics, any more mRNA "vaccines", any moves to claim ownership of people redefined as GMO transhumans, any more wrong-doing or malpractice at all, any more use of "Uniformed Officers", any weaponization of health care
--- we will all know what to think and, more importantly, what to do.
If you continue to fist bump and yuck it up with Fauci and Bill Gates, Mr. Trump, we'll pay attention to what you do. Mere words won't mean anything to us.
Please note that Commanders, as in Naval Officers, are the same exact office as the Preceptors of Rome and the Roman Church. Please also notice that the office of "Bailiff" --- Tip Staff in Maritime and Admiralty Courts today -- got its start in the Church.
Many thanks, again, to researchers in Australia, for setting flint to steel and sparking an admirable debate here. There will be more to come.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
January 23rd 2025
Hospital Militarization of the Hospitaliers
Hospitals and Commanders
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.