By Anna Von Reitz
The actual States of the Union that are complete and physically defined, have their own long-established Public Laws regarding immigration, which address the nationality of living people, not the citizenship of corporate persons.
You have heard about Donald Trump's efforts to "end birthright citizenship" --- a practice of assigning citizenship obligations at birth, that is foreign to this country and its people.
In our States of the Union, a man or woman must be at least 21 years of age before they can choose to adopt a citizenship role and accept its obligations.
Thus, the States of the Union have never adopted the foreign and to us repugnant practice of "conferring" citizenship obligations on babies at birth.
The British Territorial States-of-States and their foreign citizenry and the former Municipal STATES-OF-STATES and their foreign citizenry have both adopted this practice of conferring citizenship obligations on minors.
It is nothing that we, the actual Americans, do --- and nothing that we approve of. We have a firm history of requiring all citizenship obligations to be independently adopted by adults only, and then only under conditions of full disclosure.
So all this wrangling about "birthright citizenship" does not apply to us. It applies to the British Territorials and Municipal citizenry that resides here among us, and this is the way it has always been.
Our country is a country of immigrants, whether you are considering the immigration of Pacific Islanders and Chinese people to our West Coast circa 18,000 years ago, or the immigration of native people from Siberia across an Ice Age land bridge 10,000 years ago, or go further back to the Russian Tulsi and Doggerland giants, some of whom may have been here an astonishing 800 million years ago, everyone who is here, has come from somewhere else.
More recently, as recent waves of immigration hit our shores in the 1600's and ever since, our country has been forced to deal with issues of nationality and naturalization --- which are a separate consideration apart from citizenship.
Within the land and soil jurisdiction, the end result of our immigration and naturalization process is adoption of a new nationality, not a new citizenship.
In that regard, our laws and requirements are somewhat different when a man or woman is establishing a new nationality, than those applied by our Federal Subcontractors acting under Federal Code to establish citizenship and residency for their personnel and dependents.
They require a lengthy multi-year naturalization process culminating in establishing "Dual Federal Citizenship" and taking an Oath to support and defend the respective incorporated Federal Subcontractors--- though most people assume that they are taking an oath to support and defend this country instead.
We are much more organic and natural in our approach to "naturalization" for purposes of adopting a new nationality.
We accept those who have gone through the Federal United States Dual Citizenship process, but we also accept anyone who has managed to live in this country for seven years or more, and who has lived here peaceably without committing a felony or requiring Public Assistance during that time. Obviously, it is more difficult to prove that you have been in this country for seven years under this circumstance, but it can be done..
This has been the object of recent (ignorant) concerns and investigations by ICE and the US Attorney General's Office under suspicion that we are pushing some kind of sanctuary-city type agenda and opposing deportation of immigrants that their Municipal colleagues let into the country with no proper documentation, but such is not the case.
We are simply honoring our own Public Laws regarding change of nationality and don't pretend to address the issue of citizenship at all; in our view, citizenship is a secondary matter that is addressed after -- not before -- someone has acquired nationality.
Thus, if someone came here from Mexico and wished to adopt one of the States of the Union as their home, and become naturalized as an Arizonan and a national of that nation-state, our laws would allow them to claim that nationality simply by living in Arizona peaceably with no felonies and no dependence on Public Assistance for a period of seven years or more.
We are not aware of any obligation for them or any other American to adopt any citizenship status at all.
Thus, our laws and access to naturalization leading to change of nationality rather than adoption of citizenship opens up a narrow pathway to freedom and security for those who have been living in a State of the Union "under the radar" for many years.
It is important for Mr. Trump and the entire Federal Government apparatus to understand that nationality is a fundamentally different thing set apart from citizenship, and it is entirely possible for a person to immigrate in terms of their nationality without ever being a citizen.
For the States of the Union, the keys issues are: (1) ability to fit in and function; (2) being peaceable and getting along with your neighbors; and (3) not causing a drain on the public dole intended for the relief of our own people while living here as a foreign national.
This route is hard to tread and self-proving. Anyone who lives here successfully for seven (7) years has demonstrated that they fit in, anyone who lives here for that long without committing any substantial crime has proven to be "peaceable", and anyone who has been able to find work and support themselves for that long without public assistance, has obviously found a niche and is a positive part of their community instead of being a burden.
That said, there are many people who have lived in this country in a state of fear for many years, building lives, homes, families, even successful businesses, but always under the shadow and threat of deportation. These people are living in an unnecessary grey area, dropped through the cracks, unable to establish United States citizenship and not knowing any way to change their nationality without acquiring United States citizenship first.
We consider all this another consequence of our American Government not being sufficiently active. The current system that has been developed by our Federal Subcontractors puts the cart in front of the horse, by establishing an international citizenship before acquiring a viable new nationality.
We agree with the Trump Administration's effort to deport aliens who have entered this country en masse with no reasonable documentation and no proper orientation and no naturalization program in support. This so-called "Open Borders Policy" has been reckless in the extreme and has resulted in endangering people, especially thousands of children who entered this country and disappeared.
Our States of the Union don't have an "Open Borders Policy" and this is why the druthers of our Subcontractors in this matter are moot.
Corporations can have all the policies they want, for themselves and their personnel, but the necessity of obeying their service contracts, which provide for the defense of our borders and which allow them to reside here, is not subject to their policies and opinions.
They can't have policies that interfere with their service contracts -- the Federal Constitutions --- a reality that Joe Biden's Administration missed.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
July 2nd 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
