By Anna Von Reitz
According to Ben Fulford, China has decided to bankrupt the United States Corporation.
At least someone is paying enough attention to recognize the differences between various very similarly named legal fiction entities. That is encouraging.
The next part of discernment is realizing who the Creditors and Debtors are.
The United States Corporation owes us far more money and credit than China, and they've owed it to us for far longer.
Whether we are talking about International Trade or Commerce, our claims against these corporations have been lodged both internationally and globally for many years and are cured upon the international and global records.
As a result, if China wants to bring it's claims against these charlatans and their assets, they are welcome to do so, but China will have to join a line of Creditors, beginning with the preferential priority Creditors --- and that would be us, the actual people of this country and our States of the Union.
Let's examine the basis of China's claims:
The trillions of dollars that were siphoned off the U.S. - China Trade have been stolen from both sides of the pipeline.
Our Generals and Admirals were at fault, but so were Chinese Generals and Admirals --both groups were on the take and diverting funds from the Chinese workforce (on the Chinese side) and from the American people (creating a debt that otherwise wouldn't exist). The Chinese workers were defrauded, but so were Americans. We paid for the Chinese goods, but the payment either never reached China or came after long, unreasonable delays--- making it look like we somehow got all these Chinese-made goods and never paid for them, or paid so slowly it caused constant pain and disruption.
At thousands of retail outlets throughout this country, we paid for a flood of Chinese value-added goods that we could have made ourselves. We didn't boycott products made in China and we certainly had no magic card that let us have these products for free. At the cash register, everything was normal and natural. The sellers sold and the customers bought.
What happened was what we call "warehouse fraud" and it happened on a mammoth scale. Delays between when goods shipped and when payment was received developed. It wasn't all that obvious at first, but the problem got worse and worse. Soon, Chinese manufacturers were having to pay for financing to tide them over the long period of time while they waited for payment on goods they already shipped, and still had to continue paying for materials and labor to keep the next round of production going in the meantime.
This placed a huge, unnatural burden on the Chinese manufacturers, but they had orders to fill, so they kept filling them and taking the risk that payment wouldn't come through in time to pay for the next round of manufacturing, or wouldn't come through at all.
This is similar to the "Night Window Fraud" the banks use to benefit themselves. While money is in transit, the banks take advantage of the time that the transiting money is in their possession. They make instant trades on this money, and when it suits them, they hang up the transfer for days to take advantage of the money (or credit) that they are supposed to be transferring.
As computerized trading has become available on a twenty-four hours a day basis, the temptation to do this, and the profits from it, have increased. Whether it is money in a SWIFT account or commodities from China, this surreptitious trading on commodities that belong to others has become rampant and caused problems throughout the world.
The warehouses between The United States and China were playing the same game. The Chinese manufacturers were hurt by this, but the Chinese military and U.S. military gained. The American customers were hurt worst of all, because the cost of all this manipulation was ultimately being passed on to them.
Let's also look at the investment that has been dumped into China by the U.S. Corporations, including the targeted United States Corporation over the last fifty years. It's staggering to contemplate.
Hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure development have been lavished on China every year, factories, water supply and waste management systems, new port facilities, electrical power plants, roads, and social support infrastructure --- schools, hospitals, universities, scientific institutions, even programs preserving Chinese arts and cuisine --- have all flourished in China because of the U.S. investment money pouring in.
Who has benefited from this permanent investment in China? The Chinese government and the Chinese people. Americans lost jobs. Many of these manufacturing facilities were located in China because the U.S. removed tariffs and other trade barriers, and because of tax benefits and swaps that promoted the exodus of American manufacturing to China.
All our heavy industries were decimated, and many light industries also. Today, our country is largely dependent on Chinese manufactured drugs and microchips. We could manufacture these products ourselves, but the investment was made to build factories in China instead. We'd have to bear new investment costs and then face competition from our own former factories in China.
So, even if we leave China and decide to rebuild these industries in The United States or India or elsewhere, China keeps the factories and all the infrastructure as a de facto "gift". When we add this to the equation, the U.S. - China relationship isn't nearly so one-sided, is it?
China is not in any position to play the Victim Card and try to side-step the creditor position of the American people when it comes to the United States Corporation, which, if we are all honest, was the end result of a fraudulent claim on abandonment against our interests in the first place.
Read that: the Brits fraudulently latched upon the assets of the original Federal Republic using a False Claim on Abandonment and rolled those assets over into the United States Corporation, so it was our illegally and immorally seized-upon assets that gave the United States Corporation its start.
We've never received a dime of profit or restitution from the United States Corporation, which is actually and factually foreign to us.
We have been actively pursuing our claims against all these offending corporations since 1998, when the nature and genesis of the fraud against us and against our States of the Union became evident.
So, China, as you are contemplating bankrupting the United States Corporation, be aware that there are people here who have suffered a great deal more than you, with less culpability for the circumstance, for a longer period of time --- and we have cured claims on the public record that predate any claim you can make by twenty-seven years.
Please also notice that according to Ben Fulford, Trump needs to "refinance" $9.2 trillion dollars by December 31st.
Why don't we discuss this right now, instead of waiting until December.
Trump doesn't really need to refinance any "debt" because the debt itself is bogus. The American people long ago paid that debt with actual goods and services, then we paid for it again when we were taxed for that foreign debt plus interest, and finally, we paid for it a third time when any residual debt was palmed off on us as the "presumed" underwriters and guarantors of the United States Corporation each time it has sought bankruptcy protection.
So, not only does no such debt exist, no debt based on any interest on that debt exists. Chalk it up to bad bookkeeping and lack of oversight.
And also chalk it up as an unimaginably huge amount of physical assets and prepaid credit --with interest going back to 1871-- that is owed to us.
Time for a new accounting.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
May 24th 2025
---------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
