By Anna Von Reitz
Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

Sunday, July 7, 2024
International Public Notice: Regarding "Gold Revaluation Accounts"
International Public Notice: The Elephant in the Room
By Anna Von Reitz
Seventh Sunday After Pentecost
Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's YearThe Introit the Church invites us to give praise to God in the following words:
INTROIT Oh, clap your hands, all ye nations: shout unto God with the voice of joy. For the Lord is most high, he is terrible; he is a great King over all the earth. (Ps. XLVI.) Glory etc.
COLLECT O God, whose providence is unerring in what it ordains, we humbly beseech Thee to put away from us all hurtful things, and to give us all things which will profit us. Thro'.
EPISTLE (ROM. VI., 19-23.) Brethren, I speak a human thing, because of the infirmity of your, flesh: for as you have yielded your members to serve uncleanness and iniquity unto iniquity, so now yield your members to serve justice unto sanctification. For when you were the servants of sin, you were free from justice. What fruit therefore had you then in those things, of which you are now ashamed? For the end of them, is death. But now, being made free from sin, and become servants to God, you have your fruit unto sanctification, and the end life everlasting. For the wages of sin is death. But the grace of God, life everlasting, in Christ Jesus our Lord.
EXPLANATION St. Paul here admonishes the Romans who had been converted to Christianity, but were still sensual and weak, that they ought to be much more zealous in serving God and mastering their passions. He demands of them that they should at least strive, now as hard to save their souls as they once did to destroy them. This certainly is but right, for many a man would become just and holy if he would do as much for heaven, as he does for sin and hell. But to know how wholesome it is to consecrate themselves to justice and sanctity, he wishes them to consider what advantage they derived from sin. Nothing is gained from it but shame, confusion, sorrow, and death, but by a pious life, God's grace and eternal life. - Often consider this, Christian soul, and do not defile yourself by sins, which profit nothing, but bring shame, grief, and the retributive wrath of God.
GOSPEL (Matt. VII. 15-21.) At that time, Jesus said to his disciples: Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves: by their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits you shall know them. Not every one that saith to me: Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven: but he that doth the will of my Father who is in heaven, he shall enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Who are the false Prophets?
Those seducers who under an appearance of virtue and honesty lure innocent, simple souls from the right path, and lead them to vice and shame; who by sweet words, such as: "God , is full of love, and will not be severe on sin, He does not require so very much of us, He knows we are weak, and if a person sins, he can be converted," seek to steal from souls all modesty and fear, of God. Guard against such hypocrites, for they have the poison of vipers on their tongues. By the false prophets are also understood those who propagate error, who by superficial words fade the true faith, who speak always of love and liberty, and who under the pretense of making people free and happy bring many a soul to doubt and error, depriving it of true faith and peace of heart.
How can we know the false prophets?
By their works; for evil, corrupted men can produce only bad fruit. If we look into their life we will find that at heart they are immoral hypocrites who observe external propriety only that they may the more easily spread their poison. The false teachers and messengers of error may be known by their lives, but especially by their intentions, Which are to subvert all divine order, and to put the unrestrained lust of the flesh and tyranny in its place.
Who else are understood by the false prophets?
Those who under pretense of making men happy and rich, induce the credulous to make use of superstition, of wicked arts, deceit, and injustice; especially those who under he deceiving appearance of liberty and equality, independence and public good, incite them to open or secret revolt against civil and ecclesiastical authority.
Be not deceived by these so-called public benefactors who look always to their own advantage, but trust in God, support yourself honestly, live like a Christian, and you will find true liberty and happiness here and hereafter.
Why does Christ say: "Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire?"
He warns us that faith without good works is not sufficient for salvation; and he therefore adds; Not every one that saith: Lord, Lord (who outwardly professes himself my servant, but is not really such) shall enter into the kingdom of heaven, but he who, (by the fulfilment of the duties of his state of life and by the practice `of good works), does the will of my Father, merits heaven. Strive then, Christian soul, to fulfil God's will in all things, perform your daily duties with a good intention, and you will certainly obtain the kingdom of heaven.
What are good works?
All the actions of man which are performed according to the will of God, while in the state of grace, for the love of God.
Which are the principal good works?
Prayer, fasting, and alms deeds. These are especially inculcated in holy Scripture. (Tob. XIII. 8.) By prayer is here understood all religious services; by fasting all mortification of soul and body; by alms-deeds all works of charity.
How many kinds of charitable works are there?
Two kinds: spiritual and corporal.
Which are the spiritual works of mercy?
Those that are performed for the good of the soul: to admonish sinners; to teach the ignorant; to counsel the doubtful; to console the afflicted; to suffer injustice patiently; to forgive all injuries, and to pray for the living and the dead.
Which are the corporal works?
Those which are performed for the good of the body: to feed the hungry; to give drink to the thirsty; to clothe the naked; to visit and ransom the captives; to harbor the harborless; to visit the sick; and to bury the dead.
Can we be saved without good works?
No, for Christ expressly, says: Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire. The servant in the gospel who did not even waste the talent received, but only hid it in the ground, was therefore cast into outer darkness. How greatly do those err who hope to reach heaven, simply because they do no evil! Of this great mistake St. Chrysostom plainly says: "If you had a servant who was in truth no robber, no glutton or drunkard, but who sat at home idle, neglecting everything for which you had employed him, would you not pay him with the whip and send him off? Is it not bad enough to neglect that which duty demands?" Such a servant is the Christian who, doing neither good nor evil, makes himself thereby unfit for heaven which is the reward of work performed, and if no work has been done, no reward is to be expected.
SUPPLICATION O Lord, guard me from false prophets, heretics, and seducers, and grant me the grace, that according to St. Paul's instructions I may become fruitful in all good works. Inflame my heart, that I may adorn my , faith with them, thus do the will of the Heavenly Father, and render myself worthy of heaven.
Saturday, July 6, 2024
International Public Notice: Dear Derek Johnson, Again
By Anna Von Reitz
The Districts created by George Washington answered directly to the commander-in-chief not Congress and were part of the organizational structure of the Territorial Government as is the Office of the Commander-in-Chief itself. All that is private, not public, incorporated not unincorporated.
In order for these Districts to be created by the President, Congress had to give the President - power outside of the Constitution, as declared by Washington himself – these were not "emergency powers" per se; they were private non-delegated powers such as a corporation can exercise within its own operation or to fulfill its own functions.
The so-called "Executive Jurisdiction" exercised by the same Office of Commander-in-Chief and recognized by the U.S. (Territorial) Congressional Act of 1845 is exactly the same kind of private prerogative of an incorporated entity granting a scope of action to its President that the office did not originally explicitly enjoy.
It's all private "law" internal to the corporation, not the public.
Martial law can be used as soon as the military is called upon to put down an insurrection or fight a war or engage in physical occupation; in this case, the for-hire British-affiliated and incorporated District Territorial Forces, e.g., U.S. Army have been occupying our country illegally since the 1860's.
The reason that this is illegal is that the "Civil War" was not actually a war. It was a Mercenary Conflict. And it was not an insurrection, either, as the parties engaged in this conflict did not have the standing to promote a political action.
Put in another way, General Washington created District States, not state districts; and the military occupied, for example, the Pennsylvania District (Territorial District) until the insurgents went home, and disbanded when the rebellion ended.
"The courts residing in these Territorial "District States", then are not Constitutional courts in which the judicial power conferred by the Constitution on the general government [of the Federal Republic] can be vested.
They are incapable of receiving it [thanks to the strictly limited nature of their venues].
"They are legislative courts, created in virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exist in the government, or in virtue of that clause, which enables Congress to make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory belonging to the united States."
"The jurisdiction with which they are invested is not part of that judicial power which is conferred in the third article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress in the execution of those general powers which that body possesses over the
territories of the United States."
This is known as "territorial law" and is consistent with the exercise of powers delegated under the Northwest Ordinance, which permits the foreign British-affiliated District Forces, e.g. U.S. Army, to enter new territories and establish a temporary territorial government within the new state's presumptive borders.
This form of law has been unnaturally prolonged in use throughout the Western States and those States formed during the so-called Civil War for want of the actual State Assemblies being in Session: there was nobody "home" to finish the process mandated by the Northwest Ordinance, so these States remained Territorial District States only until October 1st 2020, when the Assemblies of the pre-Civil War States unanimously enrolled and welcomed all the Territorial District States as fully empowered States of the Union.
So let us consider this situation in terms of public Martial Law which is the Military Law of the Lawful Government of the States in time of war or insurrection or occupation, versus "Law Martial" which is Territorial law -- private law of District States and District Corporations engaged in Mercenary Conflicts.
First, a statement of Martial Law which does not apply to forces deployed under Law Martial; that is, the following would apply if the battlefield were occupied by the lawful forces of the States, but as we've seen the forces deployed as, for example, the U.S. Army, were instead forces of the District States --- the Territorial States, operating under our delegated powers.
Martial Law - Military jurisdiction - Military necessity – Retaliation:
"Article 1. A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation,
under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial
Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not."
The forces occupying our country have no recourse to Martial Law, only Law Martial, so have no "Martial Law of the invading or occupying army".
"Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest. The presence of a hostile army proclaims its Martial Law."
Again, the only "law" possessed by the Territorial U.S. Army was Law Martial, not Martial Law, and the only means they had to invoke a court was as a Territorial Court --- a District State Court, not a State Court.
"Art. 2. Martial Law does not cease during the hostile occupation, except by special proclamation,
ordered by the commander in chief; or by special mention in the treaty of peace concluding the war,
when the occupation of a place or territory continues beyond the conclusion of peace as one of the
conditions of the same."
By what right does an Army employed under contract by a peaceful civilian government and being paid by that government, become "hostile" to it?
So here we have the two conditions under Martial Law, not Law Martial, describing how occupations end -- (1) special proclamation by the Commander-in-Chief; (2) peace treaty.
Neither a Congressional Declaration of War nor any formal peace treaty ever ended the so-called American Civil War.
So there was no actual "War" by parties competent to engage in war via any Congressional Declaration of War, nor any peace process ending it; there were, however, three Peace Proclamations issued in Public by President Andrew Johnson, that did not have the effect of ending the illegal occupation of our country by the Territorial U.S. Army.
We are left with one of three possibilities: (1) Johnson did not have the proper Office and was not acting as Commander-in-Chief when he made the peace proclamations--- a situation similar to Joe Biden being "President", but not being the Commander-in-Chief; (2) Johnson's peace proclamations were a deliberate ruse by mercenary interests to confuse and defraud and disarm the public; (3) Martial Law (of the States) was being aped, but Law Martial (of the Territories) was being applied.
Art. 3. Martial Law in a hostile country consists in the suspension, by the occupying military authority,
of the criminal and civil law, and of the domestic administration and government in the occupied place or territory, and in the substitution of military rule and force for the same, as well as in the dictation of
general laws, as far as military necessity requires this suspension, substitution, or dictation.
This is the source of the repeated claim that, quote, unquote, "The Constitutions have been suspended." Once again, we are seeing the "appeal" to Martial Law, when Martial Law was never available to Territorial Forces. Lincoln knew this. Grant knew this. No doubt you know this, too, Derek, if you stop and think about it.
Everyone also knows that any "military necessity" occasioned by the hostilities that ended in April of 1865 did not extend much beyond that, and could not be reasonably justified by any such tongue-in-cheek misrepresentations of "war" such as a "War on Poverty" or a "War on Drugs" for 164 years afterward.
Yet this is precisely what we see -- a succession of British-Territorial affiliated corporation Presidents acting as "Commander in Chief" making such declarations of "war" every two years and operating under "Executive Orders" that have nothing whatsoever to do with any authorities or delegations of power conferred by the people of this country.
In other words, our employees have all been operating under Territorial Law--- Law Martial, not Martial Law; they've been running a Territorial "Congress" in place of the actual Continental Congress of the States or The United States Congress of the Federal Republic, and they've been occupying this country illegally under Law Martial and under color of law for over 160 years, simply by this ridiculous sleight of hand --- the Lieber Code, making constant reference to "Martial Law" when there was no "Martial Law" available to U.S. Territorial Forces.
It's like talking about marital obligations in a whore house. If you don't know where you are and who you are talking to, it can appear to apply and make sense, but the moment you come to your senses you realize that none of it applies to the situation in front of you.
"The commander of the forces may proclaim that the administration of all civil and penal law shall continue
either wholly or in part, as in times of peace, unless otherwise ordered by the military authority."
Self-evidently, the "President" of the "USA, Inc." has no authority to write his own contract; also self-evidently, the Territorial USA, Inc. forces have no authority to conduct undeclared war "for" us and the "military authority" referenced in the paragraph above can only have been the British Monarch, except that the British Monarch wasn't actually ever operating as the King or Queen of England, and therefore had no "sovereign right" to conduct a lawful war of conquest nor any lawful right to occupy our country.
It's a British Territorial fraud against America, wrapped inside a British National fraud against the Brits. None of it has been true or correct since 1707.
What other possible option is left? The Pope declaring a Holy War? There is no evidence of that.
The Roman Pontiff declaring a Municipal War?
There is the agreement affiliating the Vatican forces represented as the Federal (Municipal) Civil Service with the Confederate States of America --- but as above, so below. The Office of the Roman Pontiff attached to the Holy See was also a Territorial Office, which it had to be, in order to take part in an undeclared Mercenary Conflict.
What all this adds up to, Derek, is a thoroughly illegal, immoral, and secretive occupation of our country by foreign mercenary interests that were supposed to be exercising our delegated powers in our defense, not acting as lackies for the British Monarch and the "Roman Pontiff" and being engaged in wars for profit, instead.
This is gross criminal abuse of our flag, our resources, and our people at the hands of criminals acting in violation of their service contracts --- conducting wars for profit to the tune of Yankee Doodle.
Both the facts and our direct experience indicate that the USA, Inc. secretly usurped against our lawful American Government and that the Territorial U.S. Army has illegally occupied our country ever since the so-called Civil War.
What is further indicated is that the USA, Inc., has thoroughly dishonored our Title IV Flag entrusted to its use when exercising our delegated powers, and that both the HRE and the British Monarch acting as Principals have acted in Gross Breach of Trust and violation of their Service Contracts, that is, The Constitution of the United States (1790) and The Constitution of the United States of America (1789).
So, Donald Trump, appearing to be an American "Commander in Chief" when he is instead the District Territorial "Commander in Chief" is at the very least disingenuous and his actions and his inactions must be judged accurately for what they are.
The only quasi-public notice of this circumstance otherwise given to the people of this country and the world, is the constant prating of the Tories, that is, British Territorials, about their "democracy" -- the mere mention of which should jerk Americans on their feet, realizing that our country has never been a democracy and therefore wanting to know WTH is going on here?
This circumstance may be difficult to wrap your head around, considering the great duration of the fraud, but there is no statute of limitation for the crime of fraud and no excuse for continuing it.
The Lieber Code, and that means the Hague Conventions also, are predicated on the fraudulent misrepresentation of a commercial Mercenary Conflict as a War, and the knowing substitution of Territorial Law Martial for Martial Law.
Those who have done this have done this to profit themselves unjustly and have scourged and beaten, harassed, enslaved, and robbed their employers, in violation of the Laws of Earth and Sea and Heaven above; let them be so judged by history that their fraud is remembered along with the exact mechanisms and misunderstandings they used to procure these end results, so that this kind of travesty can never again succeed and these injustices never again have the ability to breed.
This country belongs to the people who live here, not those who "reside" here. Remember that, Derek. Remember that the Title IV Flag was loaned to the British Territorial Government for use when exercising our delegated powers -- not for when it was raping and pillaging and engaging in war for profit. Remember that we, Americans, are not part of any democracy.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
July 6th 2024
International Public Notice: Reply to Germany
By Anna Von Reitz