Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Monday, April 13, 2020

Rats in the Woodpile -- The Chinese Trade Deficit

By Anna Von Reitz

Think of the Rockefellers as the right hand and the Rothschilds as the left hand.
A few days ago, we observed that the purportedly massive "trade deficit" with China is an impossibility. In case you missed that, let this sink in.
For many years, we have all been lined up at the supermarket buying goods labelled "Made in China"--- haven't we? Yes, we have. That is no secret. We paid at the checkout and we took those goods home and made use of them, too. Fair and square.
So how is any "massive trade deficit" possible?
It's not.
IF the money you paid at the checkout made its way back to China, there is literally no way for a trade deficit to exist. Far from it.
Logically, the Chinese had to get paid and even make a profit on the transaction. They couldn't stay in business any other way. And they wouldn't have any motivation to keep on shipping goods to us if they weren't getting paid for it, would they?
No, they would not.
The question arises then --- "How could the US possibly have a trade deficit with China amounting to trillions of dollars?"
The only way is if the Chinese workers were never paid the full amount owed for their labor.
So, either parties on our end of the "pipeline" to use Rockefeller terms, kept the money we paid for the goods, and siphoned it off, or, the Chinese Communist Government received it and siphoned it off.
Of the two possibilities, it seems likely that both things occurred and that this happened with widespread collaboration --- that is, the Chinese officials didn't rat on the American siphoning, so long as the Americans didn't rat on them --- with the net result that the Chinese workers went hungry to bed and were no doubt told that this was because the evil Americans welched on their debts.
But the Americans aren't evil and we didn't welch on our debts. We paid for the goods we received, so there shouldn't be any trade deficit.
Now, the Rockefellers are the experts when it comes to manipulation of pipelines --- pipelines of all kinds, shapes, sorts and descriptions. Any kind of supply line they can commandeer and manipulate is their cup of tea and it doesn't matter if its Standard Oil of Omaha controlling an oil pipeline or the DHS manipulating the Swift System.
If there's a "pipeline" involved, look for the Rockefellers.
So, there's a pipeline --- the one feeding our money back to the Chinese workers. And you had better believe that the Rockefeller Clan will be involved in creating and manipulating the so-called Chinese Trade Deficit as a result.
However, this also involves siphoning off the pipeline, not just manipulating the deliveries and routes. Trillions of dollars didn't ever make it where that money was intended to go and its not in the pipeline now. It got taken out of the pipeline, not just shunted or delayed, so that indicates that the Rothschilds are involved, too.
The Rothschilds are the great masters of siphoning, like the Rockefellers are the masters of controlling supply chains and pipelines.
Hot dog, it looks like both families were engaged in creating the "Chinese Trade Deficit" and trying to lob it off onto poor old Mom and Pop standing in line at Walmart.
Like the non-existent US National Debt, the "Chinese Trade Deficit" is: (a) an illusion based on bad bookkeeping; or (b) evidence of governmental incompetence and malfeasance, or (c) evidence of financial crimes on a vast, vast scale, engineered by "unknown parties" --- but with the usual suspects in the line up.
The Chinese shipped the goods. The Americans paid for the goods.
So where's the "Chinese Trade Deficit" in that equation?
No doubt its under the table making love with the US National Debt.


See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.


  1. My understanding of the "trade deficit" with China is not an actual amount of money anyone owes anyone else. It just is a way of saying that we buy more stuff from China than they do from us by a certain amount of money. The amount is the "deficit".

  2. Thats my understanding too unknown..!!

  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    1. It was the Britain having the deficit in 1827 - 1840. This is the moment It colluded with the French, to beat the Chinese on Opium war, for more tea import. After they returned from their opium war, they met the American British-Sympathizers. They had learned the mercenary war from someone there, to play on America in 1860's. They came up with the ID fraud, Act 1871 to scam America, later. The British enticed the French be the front-runner to control se asia, while the Britain control the left half, toward India. There is an old book that talked about 4-5 countries joined force, to control se asia. Before 1827, the French didn't trust the British, after they lost their Napoleon I, thereafter their mutual conflict in Waterloo war, in 1815.

      Here is a written fact supporting the claim that England needed a big earning to solve her deficit problem then, through scamming ideas. › files › Clark2001
      charges, mortgages and bonds in England from 1725 to 1840 from the purchases ... the debt attributed to Britain is the share of the debt which was British in [1817]. ... 1,407. 31. 7. 78. 1830-4. 18. 2,597. 36. 4. 1,166. 26. 2. 57. [1835]-9. 10. 2,722.

      If you read Act of 1871 context carefully, you will see the dishonest Americans teamed up with foreign intruders, using their mutual lies, about America had to pay the British gov't for certain debts, for rescuing ship-wrecked and American soldiers, etc... That old story was part of their phony story (I believe), to create Act of 1871 out of nothing.

  4. Anna, the truth is this debt system we are part of is a scam form the toppiest part of the top. It's just about the person who "lends" the money gets paid back with interest. In the fiat/paper system they have to keep printing money to keep up with interest, creating inflation, and crashing the economy. With gold, if there's a limit to gold, how can you pay the interest of gold? There exists 5000 pieces but you owe us 5050 pieces? It's all a scam. We need to really think through an economic model that will work first for the United States in order to protect it's national security, and then how it can also operate to keep the world in a state of peace with the US as it's leader.