Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Sunday, October 6, 2019

Again, About the Arbitration by Phil Hudok and Others

By Anna Von Reitz

The following is a snippet from a conversation with one of those advocating and all excited about Phil Hudok's Arbitration.  It starts abruptly by answering the notion that the Queen or I or anyone else has the ability to determine someone else's political status.... 

Pardon me, but neither I nor the Queen have a word to say about your political status choices.   

You [those advocating Hudok's solution] are the ones claiming to be subjects of the Queen by continuing to (1) espouse "US Citizenship" without declaring which "US" you belong to; (2) by standing voluntarily under the King's Law, and (3) by accepting the relief offered by his courts (as in "welfare relief").  

By these acts, you voluntarily subject yourself to the King (or Queen), and you look ridiculous if you then claim otherwise. 

What you and others, too,  fail to comprehend ---even though I place it before you almost daily---- is that there are multiple governments at work here in America.  Not just one.   

The American Government of, for, and by the people does exist, but so does the Queen's British Territorial Government, and the Pope's Municipal Government.    All three.  

That circumstance, of having three different governments actively employed here at the Federal level,  is the result of the "Power Sharing Agreements" that are in front of your faces--- The Definitive Treaty of Paris, 1783, the implementing Constitutions, and if you were to dig further, you would find the related Treaties of Versailles and of Westminster dating 1778-1784.   

Each one of these separate governments --- American, British Territorial, and Papal --- has specific jobs to do by contractual agreement.  In performing those jobs, the subcontractors exercise our own "Delegated Powers" and operate "in our names".  This adds to the confusion.

So here you are, claiming the leniency and mercy of the King on one hand, championing his law and subjecting yourself to it, and on the other hand, claiming to be an American Patriot.   Pardon me, again, but I am not the one who is confused.   

You can be counted as an American, and claim your birthright as a State National, or you can go a step further and claim to be a State Citizen.  See the Definitions in 8 USC 1101 (a) 21 and 8 USC 1101 (a) 22 (B).  

You can also voluntarily choose to be considered a British Territorial United States Citizen (which is what you and Phil Hudok are doing, whether you realize it or not) or, you can choose to act as a Papal Municipal "citizen of the United States".  These citizenship statuses were created by the Constitutions implementing The Definitive Treaty of Paris 1783 --- Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2, and Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3.   

Both these foreign citizenship statuses cited directly above, were created by the Constitutions and without the Constitutions, they cease to exist.  

This is why preserving the Constitutions is of primal importance to all those who claim their political status based upon the Constitutions.  

We, Americans, don't base our nationality nor our citizenship status on the Constitutions.  Our political status pre-dates the Constitutions by a decade. 

So, if you want to style yourself as a British Territorial Citizen and wish to subject yourself to the Queen, who am I to criticize or say differently?  The Constitutions give you that right, just as they preserve my rights and guarantees.  


See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.


  1. So, Arbitration 'can't' be used by Americans, or State Citizens? What would be the remedy to hold our public employees liable for their crimes against the People.. Thank you for your overview....

    1. After we correct our political status, join our state assembly, get our courts running in Common Law! Then take them to our court...

    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    3. We need Sate Nationals to run our Courts, also ; a Clerk of the Court, Bailiff, Justic/Judge, Sheriff, Deputs etc.. Jurry! Freedom is a big responsiblalty and a lot off hard not paid work !!!

    4. American State National or not be involved in Goverance and be an American National.

    5. 3500 County's in America, a lot of voluntarism until we fix this!

    6. From Anna:

      It's not appropriate for someone reclaiming their political status as an American to use this form of arbitration, because it requires us to stand under the King's Law and plead for relief as members of the British Commonwealth --- Paupers, in other words, and to give up our claim to our Natural and Unalienable Rights and to our land and to our guarantees in exchange for the King's clemency.

      So, it may be palatable and profitable to some people depending on their situation and political beliefs, but it is certainly not something for actual Americans.

      I am not suggesting that British Territorial United States Citizens shouldn't use it, it's just not something compatible with what we are doing.

  2. Have you found any documentation as to why Goerge Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams or any of the other founders would give up our right to run our own government? What is the benefit of truning over our free reign to the enemy, the British and the Pope or what compelled them to do this?

    1. Gran2you, this audio will help ya!
      Secret Recording Reveals EVERYTHING
      Youtube channel end times production
      You will not believe it!!!

    2. Jasun,
      I am interested in the audio as well, thank you